TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

carrotskincare Archive

View 7 posts and 159 comments by carrotskincare on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

No, I want them to negotiate with men. Men get their rights, women get theirs and everyone live happily ever after.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:56 PM
-2

If women take away sex, they will lose all the power they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 01:27 PM
-3

It hasn't because north korea is not powerful enough to challenge USA
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:29 AM
0

Yes, but you can force them to corporate when alternative is much worse for them
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:05 AM
1

I don't think you will get life insurance if you kill someone. I don't mind you killing me if you are hot though
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:46 AM
1

I won't mind a helping hand
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:32 AM
0

Humor me
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:26 AM
1

Which comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:23 AM
2

That is also true if you "off" your baby after its born. So by your logic, it's better to "off" ur baby than abandon it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:21 AM
2

It is possible. You just don't want men to have that much power
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:10 AM
1

Saying Financial abortion is abandoning your child is same as saying aboriton is killing your child
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:05 AM
1

Yes, father shouldnt be allowed to change his mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:04 AM
1

Financial aboriton is simple Mother needs to be obligated to get consent from the father within allowed window of abortion. If she fails she can't sue for child support. If father gives consent during that time then he can be sued for child support otherwise he cannot(as long as he is the biological father) Then mother has the sole responsibility to figure out how SHE is gonna support the child if she is unable to get consent of the father. If father do give consent, he should default equal cust…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 09:36 AM
2

Financial aboriton is legal? Where?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 09:25 AM
-4

Alrighty then.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:53 AM
-12

I think big issue is that men talk about it. There is no need to talk, just do it. When you have the bargaining power, it wouldn't matter how to you talk about your issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:51 AM
3

Someone gets it. If women wanted equality we would have equality. They don't. So we have to fight for them and best way to do that is to get some bargaining power
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:50 AM
0

When chanty Binx aka "the big red" told us to "shut the fuck up" we didn't listen. I hardly think you are a match to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:49 AM
1

Let's see Protection against Paternity fraud Fair college admissions Due process in college campuses Financial abortion Gender neutral r@pe laws. Etc etc etc. Visit r / mensghts for more mens issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:47 AM
-2

Yes and men need to take that lesson from feminists and make a lot of noise about their issues. Problem is feminists are trying to pull that ladder from men. They don't even want men to come together and discuss their issues. They are even willing to pull a fire alarm illegally to do that. But at the same time, men need bargaining Power and working against women's rights give them the bargaining power to STOP working against womens rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:45 AM
-1

Currently women want abortion as a matter of right. They want men to support abortion because it's the right thing to do. If women come to men and say, women get aboriton rights and men get the right to financial aboriton. Then women are gonna get support of men and they can both work towards it. Problem is that men are not fighting against abortion as much as they should. Men are generally still in favor of abortion. Even in red states, people are generally voting for abortion on ballots despit…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:41 AM
3

No, I am saying that men need to work against women's rights so that they can have a bargaining chip. They will stop working against women's rights in exchange of their issues to be heard. It's not a zero sum game. This way, both men and women win at the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:35 AM
-10

I am not talking about hating women. I am talking about taking actionable steps against women's rights until women are forced to negotiate with men. Men need bargaining power.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:34 AM
0

Hostility is good because removing hostility is also a bargaining chip.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:31 AM
-11

Men don't need allies, men need bargaining power. Feminist will just use men as allies to further their goals while giving token prizes to men like, "letting young boys play with dolls", or "letting men cry".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:30 AM
-5

You are looking at it from a moral perspective. It doesn't matter if men's issues are related to women's issues. World cares about women's rights, so if men work against women's issues, then they have bargaining chip. Take men's issues seriously and men will stop working against women's issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:28 AM
–

I don't think hos consent was informed
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 05:58 PM
–

You should. There is a reason us govt stalled mortgage payments during pandemic. Frazer was sexually assaulted, spoke up against it and got boycotted. Then his greedy wife divorce r@ped him. She didn't need millions to survive. She did because she could. She never thought to see whether he could actually pay
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 04:27 PM
–

Tell that to brandon frazer
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 04:20 PM
–

Divorce is not a bad thing. It's divorce r@pe that's bad. Working women have their own money and it's advantageous to everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:46 PM
–

Difference between a cheating working mother and a cheating SAHM is that SAHM will get alimony and primary custody. Children will move out and man will be rewarded with hefty alimony payments. Not worth it. It's not like children are gonna pay alimony for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:41 PM
–

But kids will move out and live their own lives. Then a man will be left with hefty alimony payments that his ex wife will use on her new boyfriend. Kids are not the investment you think they are especially if a man is forced to become a weekend parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:33 PM
–

Stay at home mother
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:31 PM
–

When it comes to one's personal life, statistics are irrelevant. Even if a working wife is more likely to cheat, letting your wife being SAHM doesn't guarantee she won't cheat. So if you were one of the unlucky ones(no matter how unlikely), what matters is the cost you need to pay because that cost will be orthogonal of likelyhood of SAHM cheating. Only thing an individual man can do is remain attractive and reduce his downside.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:30 PM
0

It's fine..🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:16 PM
-2

Yes 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 03:19 PM
-3

Yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 01:40 PM
-12

Leave before nagging.. But u won't because u can't
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 01:38 PM
-14

It's not like they can't leave the moment their husbands become slob. It's not like nagging changes anything and yet they still do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 01:23 PM
0

How is that possible? If your wife is neglectful, you cant make sex life a priority.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:42 PM
0

He can get another wife. She may not wanna fuck him but he can get her. Then he is where he started.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:34 PM
–

That's so 1950s thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:32 PM
1

Did you make him feel desirable? Did you take mental load, did you take him on dates? Lol. Those questions men have to deal with. They shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:30 PM
0

External validation is required, divorces can be tough and the fear of being judged can make people stay in unhappy relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:28 PM
1

So let's just say, he is not completely useless because she did marry her and he can find other woman like her with relative ease.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:27 PM
-4

I disagree, it's completely valid to leave your wife regardless of your children's age. You need to make sex a priority, period. No excuses, except medical conditions. Even then you should be fulfilling your husband in other ways if possible. (I mean if you are bedridden, then u can't Physically do it so it's understandable) If you are too overwhelmed, then you need to communicate that this is what you need to make sex priority. You just don't drop the ball on sex, you fight tooth and nail to ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:26 PM
1

Marital benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:20 PM
1

Sure. Although I would ask why did they marry the man who is not good in bed in the first place. If they tried to secure a beta bux because they could not secure commitment from "chad", then I don't really feel sympathy for them. Same for a man who married a low libido woman, no sympathies.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:20 PM
1

Sure
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:18 PM
-1

It means he is probably not a homeless hobo Women dont marry men who dont meet bare minimum standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:17 PM
2

Yes? I havent thought about it but I don't see how it would be different for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:14 PM
-5

Divorce is better than couples therapy. Couples therapy doesn't guarantee sex, it guarantee that man invest his time and money into something that may not work for a woman who has been neglectful. If man is somewhat decent(since he is married, he is) he can get more sex after divorce than with his wife after couples therapy. Regarding open marriage, it puts the burden on man, he cant even bring other women in his own bed because his neglectful wife is there. He can't commit to other woman becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:12 PM
-3

I guess,
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:06 PM
–

Marriage is fine, it's just that men are made to think that marriage is the end game so they are failure if they leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:05 PM
–

It can cause problems but first reaction should be "do it you fucking dick, I never cheated on you, so knock yourself out"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 10:13 AM
–

Life is unpredictable
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 10:08 AM
–

Isn't that the law?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 10:07 AM
–

If men don't like teeth, they should get blowjobs from women with dentures. Teeth are natural, like body hair in women. If a man can't accept them he is a misogynist that has been conditioned by patriarchy to want toothless women. What's next, taking away women's right to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 10:07 AM
-11

Aww.. you like the attention.. cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 10:01 AM
–

Paternity fraud needs trust as a precursor.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 09:59 AM
–

Chastity belts are pretty cool. Although how would a chastity belt stop me from using my fingers and my mouth? I do my best work with my mouth. Trick is sucking on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 09:59 AM
-1

Woman needs to earn her orgasm
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 06:24 AM
0

Here is the thing, if a woman stops fucking a man and is selfish enough to use his words against him in divorce court, then it's very clear that she was never really into him. She just wanted the stability and $$. Which is fine, women do that. It's an advantage from man's perspective. Either he pays the lawyers to fight her or he pays her to go away. Then he will be free to pursue hotter younger woman. At worst it cost him little more money. Money can be made again and it's not like men even nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 06:23 AM
0

I did make a wish, rubbed the lamp and Genie came out. You are my 2nd wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 06:23 PM
-1

Are you flirting with me? U seem like you have a fetish for inexperienced men with small pepe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 06:15 PM
-2

Definitely. Dishonesty and deceit is not something a relationship can generally survive. Having sex with other women is not a big deal and to my experience women don't really care that much especially if you are attractive man.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 05:39 PM
1

I mean, I wouldn't consider that cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 05:33 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:55 PM
1

Boundaries are for you, not for your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:51 PM
1

Too late
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:50 PM
1

If she could replace him so fast, she wouldn't have married him in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:49 PM
-1

If she hides it, then it's bad. If she is honest about it, then it's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:48 PM
-2

No one is sneaking off, no one is lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:48 PM
0

She doesn't have to agree, she just need at acknowledge that she has no authority to stop her husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:47 PM
-1

He can be mad, but it's not cheating. Cheating is if you hide it. He is well informed. If he wanna divorce you over it, now he has the info to do it, if he doesn't, then it's his choice. But important point is that it's his choice. Now if your husband is being neglectful, then he doesn't really have grounds to be mad at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:46 PM
-2

No it's not. It's cheating if she hides it or lie about it
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:42 PM
-1

We are free to fuck someone else without divorce as long as we are upfront about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:41 PM
1

I don't think anyone needs their partners consent to get a divorce, no fault divorce is the law currently. Not sure about 2025
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:40 PM
1

It's not cheating if you are upfront
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:39 PM
-1

We are entitled to sex, just not with one who doesn't want to. We are free to seek sex elsewhere. I think you feel entitled to your partner's celibacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:38 PM
0

Yes, but she can even breakup with me if I don't do the dishes. So it's not the deterent you think it is
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:36 PM
-1

I don't really feel the need to equate standards of men and women. I wouldn't want a single mother even if I ever become a single father myself. I just have better standards for myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:35 PM
2

Well it can be a two way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:34 PM
2

I think women should take responsibility here. If their own husband never sexually satisfied them, then it's on them. I have no sympathy for a post wall woman who pretended to like sex with Billy beta to secure his commitment and now is complaining about it. She made the bed, she gonna have to lie in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:32 PM
0

I thought it was because I don't wipe my ass, women on twox lied to me
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:30 PM
1

That's for the man to figure out. If a woman is providing no value to him, then he needs to figure out why he is with her. All I am saying is, sex alone is not automatic reason to divorce
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:29 PM
0

Don't women leave men for not doing dishes?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:27 PM
0

But her not having sex is also her being a shitty partner. Look, sometimes we gotta be shitty. Worse you can do is do it behind her back. Be a man, be upfront and do what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:26 PM
0

Cheating is when you are dishonest about it. If you are being upfront, it's not cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:23 PM
0

Cheating is about being dishonest. If you are upfront and honest, that's not cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:22 PM
-1

Having sex with other woman is a solution. You don't need your wife's consent to have sex with OTHER women, you are just obligated to not do it behind her back. She has no real authority to stop you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:21 PM
-1

You only need your wife's consent to have sex with her, you don't need her consent to have sex with someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:19 PM
-8

It is enough. Honesty, openness, what more do you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:18 PM
1

Women nowadays divorce men because they didn't do the dishes. I hardly think not having sex with other women is any guarantee against divorce. A man who dutifully serve his wife can find himself divorced because his wife lost her mind during menopause. Divorce is not the impediment you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:17 PM
0

You are the one who is complicating things. You don't need breakup. Just tell your partner that you gonna have sex with other women and do it. Nothing changes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:13 PM
0

You can divorce for any reason you want. I am just saying that Divorce is not the only option for sexual incompatibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:12 PM
-2

No need to end the relationship. Just fuck someone else, it's NBD.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:11 PM
-1

I disagree, it's the husband's duty to be romantic and game his wife regularly. If he is failing to do it, he can't be surprised that she seeks it elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:11 PM
-7

A good wife is the one who can do both, serve as a domestic partner and satisfy husband's sexual needs. Most of the 'domestic labor' comes from women themselves. They know that they are not fulfilling their husband sexually so they double down on domestic labor to compensate for it and then use it as an excuse. It takes me like 3 hours each week to clean my apartment, prep my meals, wash my clothes and organize my stuff. Hardly a backbreaking labor. Honestly if a person struggles with domestic l…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:09 PM
-16

Cheating is when you do it behind someone's back. If you are upfront about it, it's not cheating
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:04 PM
0

Cheating is when you hide it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:03 PM
-4

You can have your cake and eat it if your partner has decided that she doesnt want to feed you the cake at home. If you are being fed cake at home, then you are foolish to look for cake elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:03 PM
-1

But they don't get a say, they don't control their partners body, and if he wants to use his body to fuck someone else, it's 'his body, his choice". Only obligation u really have is to not hide it and be upfront about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:00 PM
-16

We disagree on the divorce part, finding a new partner is a given.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 03:57 PM
1

All feminists have to do is ask men to support them in exchange for their support for financial aboriton. Win win
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:27 PM
1

California does NOT have equal custody law. If I am wrong show it to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:19 PM
2

Let's see, Kamala Harris and democrats for first time in recent memory, tried to get support of men(and failed miserably). Otherwise they would just call men predators and sexist and call it a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:18 PM
7

Go on, what are those concrete matters ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:16 PM
0

What exactly are feminists fighting for? Sexist air conditioning or Amber Heard's right to poop on her husband's bed and falsely accuse him. I think feminists can take some time from their fight against manspreading or mansplaining and make sure that young boys are not forced to pay child support when their teacher r@pes them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:15 PM
9

Honestly, they are not shitting on men. That's actually an improvement from how liberals treat men. So republicans higher bid is treating men with decency. Thats a low bar to cross.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:11 PM
3

Gender war is a good thing, it will make men's issues the center of political discourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:09 PM
2

How is that an issue? Elon Musk bought twitter and sway election in favor of trump. Twitter in 2020, censored right and swayed election in favor of Biden You can't get mad when other party plays by your rules and defeat you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:08 PM
1

Hmmm... So you are saying that democrats made the draft gender neutral when they has both house, senate and presidency?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:57 PM
-3

California does NOT have equal custody law, and it still has provision of lifetime alimony after 10 years of marriage. ??
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:54 PM
3

But a man with nothing only has a power to vote. If million men with nothing vote as a block, a man with billions who is running for office has to listen or lose millon votes. That's democracy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:52 PM
1

Yes, women are a voting block of the left. Men need to form that voting block.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:50 PM
0

So that means there is no way democrats are gonna cater to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:49 PM
1

Yes, men can't expect that their issues be taken seriously if they don't vote as a block
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:48 PM
1

Women wont do it so it's moot point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:46 PM
2

Yes, and it needs to become a voting block for the issues to be taken seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:45 PM
2

Men voting as a block is not for making republicans win elections, it's about making men's issues so essential that nno party can win without catering to mens issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:44 PM
-6

It's not about republicans being worse or better. It's about men having political power to sway elections. Political power comes first, if men have it, then it doesnt matter if its republicans or democrats in office. Both will cater to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:41 PM
1

Median income went down under Biden administration. So yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:38 PM
2

Men's issues- Gender neutral conscription Equal custody rights. Due process in college campuses. Criminalization of paternity fraud. Fair divorce laws. Better education for boys in school. Ending affirmative action in college campuses. Etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:38 PM
1

Bipartisan nature of US politics is what gives so much power to small voting blocks to sway elections. There is no reason small amount of men in strategic locations can't exploit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:35 PM
1

Trump won because democrats became entitled. They thought that just because they are better than 'uneducated people' they are entitled to their vote. They are not, an uneducated person's vote has as much value as a ivy league professor with 3 PhDs. Nothing stopped democrats from catering to uneducated men and women. But they were in their bubble, feeling entitled. And they lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:33 PM
3

What I want is a world where feminists fight as vigorously against draft as they fight against manspreading or mansplaining. What I want is a world where feminist organization do not lobby against equal custody rights and gender neutral rape laws. What I want is a world where feminists support due process rights. But that's not the world we live in. Voting against women's rights is beneficial to men's rights, because then women would understand that they need men's support to get their rights ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:29 PM
-10

Well republicans can be replaced, as long as men vote as a block.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:21 PM
1

I don't want women under my boot, I want them side by side with men working on men's issues. But if they don't, then we have no choice but to make them. Women will fight for equality side by side with men, it's not a request.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:19 PM
3

Yes, but even if they don't want support, men should give them anyways. So for example, if men decide that they wanna support democrats. So they vote for them and Dems win and decide to ignore their issues. Fine, then men just need to wait for republicans to make them a better deal. Republicans didn't. Men then just need to keep voting for democrats. After losing two consecutive elections, republicans have a choice, keep losing or make men a deal. Then democrats will be forced to up their end of…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:16 PM
5

Trump doesn't have to do anything. Men just need to keep voting red until democrats realize that they can't win without men's support. Then they will listen to men, then they will give men a better deal. Then republicans have to offer men a better deal to keep them. It's not about who wins, it's about gaining so much political power that no one can win without your support. It's not about right and wrong it's about political power.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:11 PM
1

How is that a mens issues? It's a general issue
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:06 PM
-5

Currently men don't really have anything to offer women for them to fight for men's issues and women are not gonna do that from their own good will But men do have the option to support people who are taking away women's rights. Then women have a choice, offer men a better deal or let their rights taken away. So men can manufacture incentive to make women do the right thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:03 PM
-4

Men can't win without women's support. Women just need incentive and fighting against their rights is good enough incentive for them to join forces
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:57 PM
-1

Nothing. Texas did make it possible for men to give up paternity in case of paternity fraud and not pay CS, florida ended lifetime alimony and made equal custody rights in law. Betsy Devos reinstated due process rights in college campuses under title 9 taken away by Obama. Bigger question is, what has Dems done in past decade for men
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:53 PM
-6

No?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:49 PM
1

I am fine with maternity fraud being illegal too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:38 PM
2

Yes, but still enough men voted for Trump to make kamala do weird things like go yo bars to cater to men. It's a fucking start
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:32 PM
2

It doesn't matter who wins, trump or Kamala. It matters that men vote as a block. Then both kamala and trump have to cater to them, like farmers in Iowa.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:31 PM
0

It's not about whether republicans are good for men, it's about men voting as a group for one party even if it's republicans Only then democrats will come with a better deal. Then men can just vote blue as a block and force republicans to give a better deak
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:29 PM
1

If men as a group decided that lets say, healthcare should be single payer then no party could win without making single payer system as a promise. It's not about issues, it's about political power. You have to vote as a block first for your issues, whatever they are , to be taken seriously. If you can't sway elections it doesn't matter. Financial power is fine but political power is the cheat code.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:27 PM
2

That's because men don't vote as a block on men's issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:23 PM
-2

Florida made equal custody default and ended lifetime alimony. I don't see California doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:21 PM
1

I didn't say, men need to be loyal to republicans. Men just need to stick together and give their vote to the highest bidder. Currently that is republicans. There is no reason democrats can't offer more. Whats important is that men voting as a block will stop any party from gaining power if they are unwilling to cater to men. So men's issues will become a default like, corn subsidies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 01:18 PM
1

She has to take very concrete steps though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:34 PM
2

No, I was thinking on the lines on working on herself to figure out the ways she can enjoy bring more intimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:16 PM
3

I think one should look at like past 6 months as a reference. People have bad days but if bad days translate to bad weeks and bad months then I don't think anyone should be made to feel guilty about leaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:07 PM
1

Ah well then it good. No one is shocked and people can walk away without much fuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:21 PM
2

I am triggered because you are being idiotic. All I said was if a husband is not sexually satisfied, you can harp on the reasons why it's his fault but it wont change the fact that he is not satisfied. Why is it so hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:11 PM
2

What the fuck is your problem? Where did I say that wife is not allowed to leave or wife is not satisfied? If husband is not satisfied, then he is not satisfied. Either fix it or enjoy the divorce. What more do you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 07:06 PM
3

What you are trying to say here is that he needs to meet her needs first before she meets his needs. It won't work. Because she has to want to satisfy her husband's needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:11 PM
2

U still don't get it, Husband is not sexually satisfied, you may think he husband is at fault or he doesn't deserve sex or 1000 different reasons. But it won't change the fact that husband is not sexually satisfied. So when you try to place blame on husband for his wife not meeting his needs, there is a good chance that you are right. But it still doesn't change the fact that husband is not sexually satisfied. So when husband decide to divorce his wife for not being sexually satisfied, he is not…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:08 PM
4

Thing you don't understand is that even if you have legitimate reasons to neglect your spouse, you are still neglecting your spouse. So when a woman says that she doesnt want to have sex with his husband because he doesn't do housework, even if we assume that is a legitimate reason to neglect her husband's sexual needs, she is still neglecting them Because we can communicate all we want. The reality is that husband is not sexually satisfied. So solution is not to withhold sex and hope for the be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:58 PM
3

It may come as a surprise to you, but relationships are not competition between husband and his wife. Husband's needs are not more or less important, they are important, period. It doesnt matter what reasons wife has for neglecting her husband, she is neglecting her husband. Wife has as much right to refuse to meet her husband's needs as husband has to meet her needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:42 PM
3

That may as well be true, and we can blame husband for all his inadequacies that lead to the situation. But it's not for us to decide what his requirements are, it's for him to make that decision. You can't say that his needs are invalid because they are always valid. His wife is under no obligation to meet those needs but he has the right to find a new wife. Don't try to tell a man that it's his fault that his wife won't fuck him. It's for his wife to tell him exactly what she needs to meet his…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:16 PM
3

More like a mental block that comes when a man doesnt generate enough value first
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 04:20 PM
4

I think it's for husband to decide what is appropriate level of intimacy to him. If wife is not willing to fulfil it, and husband has communicated then she can't act surprised when she is divorced.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 04:19 PM
6

Lack of sex is ground for at fault divorce I think, even in new york
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 04:17 PM
5

Getting back into the game is like losing weight, You just need to wake up and start running till you puke. Then just never stop running and it will become second nature
/r/seduction01/12/24 04:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter