cashed Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	White knighting, thought-crime police, and throw in some demonization of male sexuality and you have this video. Ah, sarcasm. What a soothing salve for the wounded ego. I hope you grow up one day.	/r/MensRights	15/09/11 06:38 PM
-1	White knighting, thought-crime police, and throw in some demonization of male sexuality and you have this video. I'm sorry that you didn't give an honest answer. Or, even more sorry for you, if you genuinely believe that answer is honest. *This point isn't a matter of opinion. It is a matter of fact. The cameraman was in no way neutral. And he was certainly not merely an observer.	/r/MensRights	15/09/11 06:20 PM
-2	White knighting, thought-crime police, and throw in some demonization of male sexuality and you have this video. Okay, that made me laugh. One cannot be the catalyst of a conflict, a participant thereof, and ALSO a neutral observer. If that's the best you have to offer, I think that we should just end our conversation here.	/r/MensRights	15/09/11 06:15 PM
-2	White knighting, thought-crime police, and throw in some demonization of male sexuality and you have this video. I'm quite familiar with the tactic of hiding in semantics. You state that I am making an incredible leap. If I am, then what was your point of posting this except to create the distinction between the cameraman and the subjects and actions described by your title? If I am incorrect in my discernment then, by all means, correct me. What is the cameraman, to you?	/r/MensRights	15/09/11 05:41 PM
-2	White knighting, thought-crime police, and throw in some demonization of male sexuality and you have this video. Look at the other discussions tab. Plus your title labels everyone else as wrong while the cameraman is curiously left free of any reproach. And a folkway is a sociological term. It is essentially a cultural norm that is not codified as law.	/r/MensRights	15/09/11 05:20 PM
-2	White knighting, thought-crime police, and throw in some demonization of male sexuality and you have this video. Do you honestly think that the cameraman wasn't violating any folkways? *And for clarity, I never accused the cameraman as behaving improperly. I just stated my incredulity at his being held up as a paragon of virtue or righteousness.	/r/MensRights	15/09/11 04:44 PM
-2	White knighting, thought-crime police, and throw in some demonization of male sexuality and you have this video. I cannot help but feel that you are losing the battle when you hold this cameraman's actions up as noble or proper.	/r/MensRights	15/09/11 04:29 PM
10	Dear Prudence: I got my ex-boyfriend fired deliberately. If there is justice in this world then she will confess and rightly be arrested for, charged with, and convicted of a number of felonies.	/r/MensRights	31/08/11 04:34 AM
9	Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival allows 4-year-old male toddlers: "It’s outrageous that girls would be expected to bathe with these males roaming around. And older girls, while offered segregated field trips and activities, must share campground accommodations with males if they have brothers." My comment, and I doubt it will go live. A reasonable adult August 30, 2010 12:38 am Please Note: Your comment is awaiting moderation. I concur, and genuinely hope that you are successful in your attempts to remove every male from your presence. I pity these boys for any time they are forced to share space with someone who is quite literally bursting with seething contempt for them merely because they had the audacity to be born male. Any effort on your part to limit your proximity is sure to be…	/r/MensRights	30/08/10 12:39 AM
2	The lower-IQ sex: Measures to socially engineer more women into top positions are attempts to force square pegs into round holes and will founder on the rock of human nature The bogeyman is real, and here it is: Nuanced person: on average, people A are better than people B at activity XYZ. Zealot: Any B caught doing XYZ must die. Setting aside, for the moment, your slick slope; I cannot help but wonder if you are advocating the silencing of the nuanced person for fear that his nuance will be lost on some parties.	/r/MensRights	03/05/10 12:42 AM
3	Dr. Helen: Is Control over Porn Really about Control over Men’s Sexuality? This may be tangential to your original point, however it is pertinent nonetheless. When one considers the near unfettered access to immediate gratification that our society and technology afford, anyone who consumes these immediate gratification services is completing a behavioral modification cycle. That is, each consumer is training himself or herself to expect gratification at the cost of less effort expended. Depending on how you view society, this may or may not appear to be a problem to y…	/r/MensRights	02/04/10 06:29 PM
-1	Texas Governor Grants Posthumous Pardon: Gov. Rick Perry on Monday pardoned a man who died in prison after serving more than 10 years on a wrongful rape conviction The sentence, for a convicted man was appropriate since he was declared guilty. Yay, you finally got it! Congratulations!	/r/MensRights	03/03/10 06:11 PM
-1	Texas Governor Grants Posthumous Pardon: Gov. Rick Perry on Monday pardoned a man who died in prison after serving more than 10 years on a wrongful rape conviction Gosh, how helpful of you to point out to me what I mean when I post statements. I sincerely thought that I was making a rather obvious point that a court is duty bound to sentence a convicted man to the appropriate sentence when he is found guilty -- beyond a reasonable doubt -- of a crime. What good is a court of law that renders itself toothless to sentence convicted men for fear of their innocence, when that same court has just found them guilty of the crime? Hindsight is 20/20. Yes, you are …	/r/MensRights	03/03/10 02:07 AM
0	Texas Governor Grants Posthumous Pardon: Gov. Rick Perry on Monday pardoned a man who died in prison after serving more than 10 years on a wrongful rape conviction cashed, i am not following, are you suggesting people should not feel passionate about wrongful convictions? have you ever been incarcerated in texas, as a rapist, and as a non-rapist? do you have anything to contribute to this conversation beyond your armchair statsnazi'ing? what makes you think you know anything about texas beyond your little bubble, my advice is become a part of the circle jerk as it is way fore mun. I am suggesting that a person try to maintain a certain level of reason in h…	/r/MensRights	02/03/10 11:18 PM
0	Texas Governor Grants Posthumous Pardon: Gov. Rick Perry on Monday pardoned a man who died in prison after serving more than 10 years on a wrongful rape conviction I think you ought to try some reading comprehension. Certainly we can agree that it is unjust for an innocent man to be convicted Is one contention. but I cannot understand why you would begrudge a court that finds a man guilty of rape beyond a reasonable doubt of sentencing him to a lengthy prison term. Is a separate contention. If a court of law finds a man guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, it therefore, necessarily, is obligated to sentence that man to the appropriate punishment for the crime…	/r/MensRights	02/03/10 11:10 PM
0	Texas Governor Grants Posthumous Pardon: Gov. Rick Perry on Monday pardoned a man who died in prison after serving more than 10 years on a wrongful rape conviction Law enforcement has pretty much the green light to murder people at their leisure there and 99.9% of the time, they get away with it. It seems that you have a tenuous grasp of statistics, reality, or both. That wasn't my point. Texas is a state that doesn't like to be proven wrong and likes to drag their feet on releasing and clearing people's records whom are wrongfully convicted. A state that does not like to be proven wrong? An entire state? I think you might want to limit the scope of that s…	/r/MensRights	02/03/10 05:17 PM
2	Texas Governor Grants Posthumous Pardon: Gov. Rick Perry on Monday pardoned a man who died in prison after serving more than 10 years on a wrongful rape conviction If the guy were still alive, he would still be in prison. Texas is pretty brutal once they get their grubby hands on you. What do you think is an appropriate amount of time for a convicted serial rapist be incarcerated? Certainly we can agree that it is unjust for an innocent man to be convicted; but I cannot understand why you would begrudge a court that finds a man guilty of rape beyond a reasonable doubt of sentencing him to a lengthy prison term. In 1985, Timothy Cole was a student in Lubboc…	/r/MensRights	02/03/10 04:09 PM
0	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. Right, you want a polarizing figure who is maligned by the partisan media and everyone who disagrees with him as a figurehead for your movement, brilliant! Write a letter and mail it to a local paper, that'll get you much farther.	/r/MensRights	19/02/10 03:42 AM
0	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. Here's an idea. You do something about it. Why not write a civil and concise explanation about the ills of the status quo and mail it to every local and regional paper once a week? Why not contact local and regional reporters regarding human interest stories of sympathetic father figures being shafted by the system? I am flabbergasted, but I should not expect otherwise; biologically speaking, one would need to visit the men's rights subreddit to find so much impotent rage.	/r/MensRights	19/02/10 03:41 AM
1	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. I'm sorry, I didn't sign up for the job of selecting the face of a movement. I merely asked some valid and necessary questions and stated a few reasoned points. It is apparent that a devil's advocate is as needed as he is unwanted in these parts.	/r/MensRights	19/02/10 01:01 AM
0	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. I take it that you look upon your brutishness as if it is an asset or personal strength?	/r/MensRights	19/02/10 01:00 AM
3	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. If we can use him, we should. Even if you pinch your nose and use gloves to handle him, you're still stuck with a shitty candidate for the face of the movement you seem so driven to have succeed. You're advocating handcuffing yourself to some backwoods kid who can fall from media favor just as quickly as he rose.	/r/MensRights	19/02/10 12:46 AM
1	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. Are you joking? Practically anyone. Hell, I can name 2 men that I know personally who would be much more sympathetic figures and could actually rationally and honestly explain how the situation each faces, no matter how unique to himself, is an archetype for serious flaws in an archaic system. You are quite literally asserting that a child who became famous for impregnating the child of a politician is prepared to or even capable of doing that? Good grief.	/r/MensRights	19/02/10 12:37 AM
-2	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. Palin is a polarizing figure which could make more people sympathetic to our fight. Then you are truly grasping at straws.	/r/MensRights	18/02/10 11:05 PM
-2	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. I hope his plight brings about a national discussion for how messed up the system is. He is a media darling, and only because he has made himself a platform for brutish anti-Palin rhetoric. He is a vapid and empty vessel that only receives air time because he can be harnessed to further denigrate Sarah Palin. And you think that he is in a good position to do anything for your cause?	/r/MensRights	18/02/10 11:04 PM
4	Bristol Palin suing for $20,261.04 a year in child support from Levi Johnston when he makes $18,594.50 a year. I am dumbfounded that you would want this child to be viewed as the face of a civil rights movement.	/r/MensRights	18/02/10 07:29 PM
-1	Women worse at parking than men, study shows I think it is at the very least interesting how the researcher finds it necessary to explain herself when quoted in the latter half of the article. Also, consider that there are an incredible number of indoctrinated people in this world who believe that there are no biological differences between the sexes. Consider this good ammunition for the next time a feminist ideologue waxes about social constructs as the root cause of differences between the sexes. While the researchers expected the women…	/r/MensRights	22/12/09 05:48 PM
0	If you want to know why people scoff at MRAs and this subreddit, I think I've found a solid example for you: It's not the manner in which he views marriage, it's the completely dogmatic manner in which he expresses those views.	/r/MensRights	24/11/09 04:57 AM
-4	The root of the problem is that the kind of man she wants is precisely the man who is smart enough to stay away from her. Oh God. I give you the evidence you're looking for that clearly shows marriage is a complete failure and you talk about cars???? You made a ridiculous argument and I revealed it as such. You substitute brash emotion for reason far too liberally. Calm down and actually think about the words that you are typing. But I will spell it out. You argued against the utility of marriage entirely based upon a failure rate of 50 percent over the lifetime of those people entering into it. If the only utility…	/r/MensRights	24/11/09 01:44 AM
-1	The root of the problem is that the kind of man she wants is precisely the man who is smart enough to stay away from her. Setting aside your hyperbole for the moment, let me address the basis of your argument. You define marriage as a failure because it does not last for the lifetime of half of the participants. Over 50% of all marriages end in divorce. That's an "F". But that doesn't even begin to tell the story. 70% of all divorces are initiated by women. YOU MIGHT WONDER WHY???? If men initiated divorce at the same rate as women the divorce rate would be north of 70%. Given that line of reasoning, would you also…	/r/MensRights	23/11/09 11:33 PM
-1	The root of the problem is that the kind of man she wants is precisely the man who is smart enough to stay away from her. Your inference, that anyone who disagrees with you must be ignorant, is absurd on it's face. Stop talking down to me as if you were some sort of modern day oracle. If marriage were such a horrendous institution then you would have no shortage of evidence in support of your breathless screeds. As it stands, you have posted none of that evidence. Where is it? And don't tell me to read a book, if the (pseudo-)facts that you espouse are so self-evident then they should be easily referenced by a casu…	/r/MensRights	23/11/09 08:52 PM
-1	The root of the problem is that the kind of man she wants is precisely the man who is smart enough to stay away from her. Any man who marries a dependent woman is either ignorant or stupid. Really? Wow. You are zealous beyond reason. Please educate yourself and stop supporting such drivel. I find this statement absolutely hilarious. I supported the notion that one shouldn't consider half the population of the earth his enemy out of prejudice. That's drivel? You cannot expect to be happy with the mindset you espouse. That's worth repeating.	/r/MensRights	23/11/09 06:41 PM
5	The root of the problem is that the kind of man she wants is precisely the man who is smart enough to stay away from her. I downvoted you, but I want to also explain why. You cannot expect to be happy with the mindset you espouse. The opposite sex is not the enemy. Anyone who takes up that banner is destined to a sad, hollow existence, man or woman.	/r/MensRights	23/11/09 06:53 AM
3	Woman in brutal W.Va. sexual torture case says it was all a hoax She is black, the defendants *(who have since taken a plea bargain) are all white. One can argue about whether or not race should play a part in the narrative about this incident during and after the trial, however it is undeniable that race did play a significant part.	/r/MensRights	22/10/09 01:35 AM
-2	My Response To "Schrödinger’s Rapist: or a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced" Nevermind, you are being purposefully obtuse or immune to reason, in either event further correspondence is futile. Good luck with your doctoral work.	/r/MensRights	14/10/09 12:11 AM
-1	My Response To "Schrödinger’s Rapist: or a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced" I like men. Most of my friends are men. I live with two men. But even if 1 in 100 men makes sexual suggestions to strangers, that's a lot of people encountered within a given period of time who will do so. The chances are pretty good that if a strange man approaches in a situation where they probably have no legitimate reason to need to speak to me, they're going to make a sexual comment or an unwanted romantic approach. "Rape" is an inflammatory word (and again, I think that's part of why the a…	/r/MensRights	13/10/09 11:52 PM
-1	My Response To "Schrödinger’s Rapist: or a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced" Being approached by a strange man frequently leads to unwanted flirtation and commentary on one's looks. That's not a comfortable situation to be in. First off, who are you speaking for? Yourself or the entire female sex? Either you have undertaken exhaustive research or you are overstepping some bounds of credulity or plausibility. If this is a personal narrative then you should treat it as such, invoking half the population in an attempt to add weight to your opinions is sophomoric. I don't th…	/r/MensRights	13/10/09 11:28 PM
2	My Response To "Schrödinger’s Rapist: or a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced" works now. good read.	/r/MensRights	13/10/09 01:16 AM
1	My Response To "Schrödinger’s Rapist: or a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced" link borked? for me it seems to be.	/r/MensRights	12/10/09 11:56 PM
-1	Don't Let The Trolls Win You're worthless as an adversary. Too obtuse.	/r/MensRights	15/09/09 06:45 AM
-1	Don't Let The Trolls Win You're right. You have nothing else to learn, you already know. I'm not here to keep you honest. To wit, that statement is at direct odds with what you have been attempting to do. Misguided as your attempt was, your actions are in direct opposition to your words.	/r/MensRights	15/09/09 06:15 AM
-1	Don't Let The Trolls Win Next time quote the fucking post and you'll not need me to point out your oversights. There was no editing for substance, you shot off half-cocked out of a gleeful desire to disprove imagined talking points and therefore establish how smart and snarky you truly are. If you pay such good attention to edits, you'll also notice a great deal of my posts have little asterisks by them, because I like to look over the whole post and make any grammatical or blocking corrections that are necessary. Every…	/r/MensRights	15/09/09 05:13 AM
-2	Don't Let The Trolls Win I'm glad that the system you have has been working for you. I'm also glad that you haven't needed non-emergency surgery or treatment. Reading comprehension?	/r/MensRights	13/09/09 11:10 PM
-1	Don't Let The Trolls Win http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/11/2065287.aspx From NBC's Mike Viqueira The White House tonight is providing the below clarification on what the president's health-care proposals would mean when it comes to the issue of illegal immigrants. The question, as we all know, arises from the Wilson "You lie" outburst, and the core claim that notwithstanding specific bill language barring illegal immigrants from participating in the "exchange," as a practical matter, there is no way of v…	/r/MensRights	12/09/09 11:36 PM
-4	Don't Let The Trolls Win Finally, on your third response you actually get near the crux of the matter. First, solidarity is primarily about union or fellowship, it is not about ignoring poorly made points or overlooking ignorance about a different health care system. I firmly believe that iron sharpens iron, and would rather create an argument than have you skate through life foolish to practical realities or truths. If after our exchange you choose to still cling to your beliefs, so be it. But I will offer up necessary…	/r/MensRights	12/09/09 10:01 PM
-7	Don't Let The Trolls Win Right. Dismissive tone twice in a row, and yet each time your posts are quite short on rhetorical substance. I guess it's easier to just wallow in your own preconceived notions rather than peek your head up out of that shit and take a look around. Arrogance mixed with ignorance.. Must be from Quebec?	/r/MensRights	12/09/09 09:18 PM
-5	Don't Let The Trolls Win Oh right, my apologies for pointing out a significant inconsistency in your marginally topical anecdote. Consider me put in my place. Pardon the interruption, I won't further prevent you from presenting your face to the rest of your circle jerking ilk so that they may gift you with hot loads of upvotes. edit: and fine dodge of the actual substance of my post. Better to disregard the argument thereby avoiding any critical thinking and the accompanying cognitive dissonance.	/r/MensRights	12/09/09 08:54 PM
-7	Don't Let The Trolls Win The man you point to as elegance in chief either lied at the podium or lied just days earlier.. because a few days before this big speech he was saying that 46 million Americans are without health insurance and need his plan. 46M - 30M = 16M undocumented aliens. Shit, even the AP and Reuters are fact checking his dubious assertions now.	/r/MensRights	12/09/09 07:31 PM
-1	Circumcision doesn't help protect gay men from AIDS, according to the largest U.S. study to look at the question. The comment, as I wrote it, is correct.	/r/MensRights	04/09/09 10:51 PM
1	Circumcision doesn't help protect gay men from AIDS, according to the largest U.S. study to look at the question. yes.	/r/MensRights	04/09/09 06:08 PM
0	Circumcision doesn't help protect gay men from AIDS, according to the largest U.S. study to look at the question. However, I agree with the contention that this is rather a bit of common sense, however I think you chaps are missing out on the sense portion of it. Gay men, by an overwhelming majority, are infected with HIV through the introduction of infected ejaculate during anal sex with an HIV positive partner. The anus has a membrane with the sole purpose to grab whatever is in there and pull it in to check it out. This makes it absolutely useless at preventing infections, if they are introduced here fro…	/r/MensRights	04/09/09 06:07 PM
1	Circumcision doesn't help protect gay men from AIDS, according to the largest U.S. study to look at the question. HIV is a virus. (emphasis by me.)	/r/MensRights	04/09/09 05:58 PM