TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cashmunnymillionaire Archive

View 4 posts and 395 comments by cashmunnymillionaire on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I was also an SEC college mascot. It really helps the non-verbal game with gals, especially since my particular character was a "player." Real smooth shit that I still use today, even though I'm married. Glad to hear you broke out of your shell.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 04:54 PM
4

Nope. It's absurdly cheap to manufacture and distribute, cheaper than the syringe to administer it. That is partly why Big Pharma hasn't touched the shit. It's a one time administration, BC is a monthly cash-cow. Parsemus Foundation is a non-profit dedicated to bringing this to market because Big Pharma won't. Investment tip is to short BC holding companies as married couples and LTRs everywhere get of that shit and enjoy the sweet return to fully functional female sexuality tied into their natu…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 05:57 PM
3

I think the Shaman from yesterday made an alt account for posting this.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 06:34 PM
1

In the past, the men in white coats, not the police, would handle this situation.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 10:28 PM
-4

Got a link to that LJ bruh? PM so you don't get doxxed like CoffeeShopFag.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/16 09:18 PM
25

Oh shut the fuck up Brad. 98% of us on this sub were heavily indoctrinated into the same bullshit, but we managed to somehow figure shit out. The truth is, TRP has always been a philosophy in every culture, observed by the top %20 of men who just get it. You have to be in order to seek it out and understand it. If you don't think you can be top %20, then you will reject it out of hand because being a loser fucking sucks. You're worried because 14 year olds have no fucking critical reasoning skil…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/16 09:05 PM
84

TL:DR; You can't turn a ho into a housewife.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 03:29 PM
1

Yeah, I didn't think that the movie was all that rah-rah you go girl bullshit. It's ok to have a female hero, especially in the absence of bullshit boilerplate modern Disney princess strongwoman model.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 08:59 PM
8

If you say so. Pre-selection is a matter of frame control if you ask me.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/15 05:48 PM
6

Dude, so my wife loves this show because weddings. I love this show because it's distilled Red Pill. So many guys on this show are hopeless, including this BOZO. He's uber-fucking blue-pill. He buys off his 19 year old fiance with a bunch of expensive shit. He's basically an Omega who has no idea how to talk to women, give them tingles, or anything else, but has enough money to be the ultimate BB. There are way better RP examples on this show.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/15 05:18 PM
49

S – “Be there about 9” 7:30 it is I decided to go early because I need to be part of the tribe before anybody is there. To the dumb sluts in NY, if you are friends with all the hosts, you are safe. It stops a lot of shit tests before they start. This is crucial to being the life of the party. You also get to greet everybody as they come in and learn names slowly instead of all at once. If you start the party, you control the frame of the party, including the fact that you are the life of it.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/15 05:08 PM
1

Lol. Ever notice how the men who want women in men's spaces typically don't look like they could ever go into mixed-gender spaces and pull tail?
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 07:23 PM
1

Yeah, that saying should really be "Happy Life, Happy Wife." They pick up on how you feel about yourself. Focus on making your life rock and they'll be happy to be along for the ride.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 05:30 PM
2

Thanks bruh. I'm a pretty light smoker so it shouldn't be hard, except when I'm drunk.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 02:17 PM
8

Ditching: Porn/Faps, Cigs, Fast-food Daily: Workout, Music
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 07:23 PM
1

Fuck off with that line of thinking. I'll take being CFO of a fortune 500 any day over owning a small-medium sized business. You own none of the risk and get 5x the financial reward and a golden parachute if things go south.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 04:33 PM
33

Don't be a retard. Republicans have spent just as much, if not more of your money. They just spend it on things that don't enhance your life in any way like corporate subsidies and foreign military assistance.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 03:12 PM
25

Part 1: Sighs of relief and phrases such as "leader," "protector," "caretaker," "responsible," "head of the house" fell from their mouths. Each session, I told them that they had just described my single mother Part 2: I digested every kind of pop cultural icon one could name, on television, in movies, in books, in my beloved hip-hop culture, who represented the mighty male figure that armies of us were instructed we must become.This behavior led to catastrophic results for me. I had no clue how…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 07:43 PM
63

It's amazing how easy the criteria are to be Alpha. It can basically be summed up as 1)Work out 2) Do you
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 07:06 PM
23

dude, he makes money in the sense that his trust fund generates interest. This guy does fuck all.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 12:36 PM
10

Agreed. The end goal of red-pill for me is not to smash pussy, it is to learn to how be married to a good woman (I'm married to a traditional n=0 wife) and keep her from destabilizing the family via divorce by being the best MAN I can be. In that way, I have some small impact on overall culture by raising children correctly.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 02:32 PM
3

The single working mother is not a trend but a long term projection for the future with all that it entails. With the arrival of Vasalgel in a few years, women will pretty much have to get married if they want to have children. The market will self-correct because way fewer men will be on the receiving end of an "oops."
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 06:48 PM
4

I'm a lifelong lefty, and I think that shit is retarded.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 06:13 PM
2

Fuck off with that "le wrong generation" bullshit man. You sound like someone who doesn't know shit about music and listens to the radio like a basic bitch from Tinder that "likes a little bit of everything." Rock music is still fucking alive and well, just morphed into different genres. Guitar parts have gotten far more aggressive and technical in a large majority of them. Rod Stewart used to clean up with the ladies and he was an effiminate man. The thing is, being a frontman for a band ranks …
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 06:09 PM
2

It's the arts-y vibe. Former emo beta-faggot here, and I did pretty well for myself in H.S. by being outgoing and involved in several extra-curriculars and the local music scene. I still had massive beta tendencies once in a relationship, but I would imagine the rest of my lifestyle, including my dress, indicated that I was enough of a risk-taker bad boy to get the fairly innocent teenage juices flowing. Now that I'm dressing professionally, those years of wearing tight clothes comes naturally, …
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 06:00 PM
13

This advice will help fit athletic men get laid, it is a colossal waste of time for fats. So to all of the fats still reading this: go be fat somewhere else. You got me in stitches man.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 03:37 PM
1

Yeah, but college educated individuals get divorced less than non-college educated adults.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/15 06:58 PM
1

Mods should sticky this. Too many RP noobs are fooled by these beta-bragging "field reports" that claim to unleash some truth or something. They more so paint broad caricatures. True RP and AM is far more nuanced. Women are animals, not robots. Cesar Milan follows a general code of conduct when a dog is out of control, but every animal is different and needs the right TLC. It's not as simple as input:output. Honestly, "all women are similar" is probably what we should be saying instead of awalt.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 02:08 PM
1

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 05:41 PM
1

Because the Betas thought they could get laid more than actually turned out to be true. So instead of getting no sex at first then virtuous wives, they got no sex at first, then wives that don't want to fuck because they're Alpha Widows.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 07:14 PM
2

It depends on the sorority and the school. AWALT, but at Auburn, a good number of the sorority girls were pretty good up until they turned 21, electing to find their "Chads" at the local contemporary christian church, then maybe dabbling in serial monogamy before getting engaged before graduation.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 04:18 PM
2

DO NOT TALK ABOUT FEELINGS. DO NOT. DO NOT!!!!!!!!!!
/r/MarriedRedPill08/09/15 08:40 PM
2

Just "Oops." Sounds like if you lead, she'll follow.
/r/MarriedRedPill08/09/15 08:27 PM
1

That is total redpill parenting right here. Well done sir, I'm still working on my patience and want to be like this before I have a kid.
/r/MarriedRedPill08/09/15 08:05 PM
1

This is pretty poorly done as a takedown.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 06:17 PM
-13

You know, you can always vote in the primary to get Bernie, bruh. He similarly RP in his ability to hold frame.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 06:48 PM
13

Friends of friends. People used to get set up all the time before the advent of internet dating. Have friend's whose judgement you trust introduce you to a worthy woman.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:21 PM
1

This is really stupid. Men who have children before 25 are more likely to work blue collar jobs, have lower income, less education, etc. Those all increase risk of stress. Chronically high cortisol levels cause all kinds of problems. Poverty is bad for men's health, not children.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:47 PM
2

Men who have children before 25 are more likely to work blue collar jobs, have lower income, less education, etc. Those all increase risk of stress. Chronically high cortisol levels cause all kinds of problems. Poverty is bad for men's health, not children.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:45 PM
1

Men who have children before 25 are more likely to work blue collar jobs, have lower income, less education, etc. Those all increase risk of stress. Chronically high cortisol levels cause all kinds of problems. Poverty is bad for men's health, not children.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:44 PM
2

This looks pretty terrible.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:11 PM
-2

God, this sub has gone downhill. Who cares.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:17 PM
2

Because he is proposing real policies such as gender neutral paid leave that will actually reduce the gap, not just empty platitudes. If Bernie is going to do anything to fix the income gap, it will be to the minor benefit of women (lots of women have maternity leave) and major benefit of men(almost nobody gets paternity leave.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:11 PM
9

Also, Sanders is for paid family leave for FATHERS and mothers. This guy is actually proposing concrete policies that would reduce the wage gap and help men at the same time. 77cents is just the talking point that women respond too. Bernie understands policy and statistics far better than the average bear. Vote for Bernie.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:08 PM
1

This op ed is 5 years old. 5 YEARS. The proposed legislation didn't pass and isn't even before a legislative body currently.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:09 PM
2

Dalrock nails it.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/07/15 04:08 PM
1

Acta non Verba bro. Just be redpill and correct behavior when it happens, don't lay it all out at once because it's too much to take in. Evolving into a RP husband takes time.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/07/15 08:54 PM
0

I think this nuclear option is best held close to the vest. Fix the minor things first.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/07/15 08:50 PM
3

Lol no. My sex life never died off. Marriage isn't a shit test, it's a comfort test bro. You're sex life died off because of you, not the act of marriage.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/07/15 08:48 PM
3

Most definitely. MRP can basically be boiled down to: Exercise, stoicism, decisiveness. That fixes the problems most every problem in a marriage.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/07/15 04:41 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 07:06 PM
1

The test measured teamwork in the context of a spatial intelligence oriented task. That is a confounding variable and poor study design. I agree with the conclusions, but the methodology is suspect and a doesn't mitigate spurious influences. The biggest problem with social research is that people don't understand how to form airtight statistical models. This example is no exception. Chill bro.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 01:42 PM
0

No, I'm just railing against the nanananabooboo that people like to do around here, by pointing out that the methodology of this study can be just as easily reversed.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:10 PM
2

Well, it depends on the range. Shapeless is bad. I don't mind a little meat on the bones, however. They aren't naturally low value at all, and a little pooch is actually a sign of fertility. As long as there is a waist, I'm cool with the curves. In some cultures, fat women are more desired, so I'd venture to say that a symetrical face and hip-waste ratio are far more important genetic markers of fitness than BMI. Edit: PopScience agrees: http://www.scienceofrelationships.com/home/2013/11/11/curv…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 07:07 PM
1

Speak truth to power, bruh.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:44 PM
7

I'm the opposite, to each his own.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:37 PM
7

Fair enough, I'm merely pointing out that the study has a pretty significant confounding variable because the task is spatial in nature. My main point is that the solution to social "research" rabble rousing isn't more rabble rousing with counterpoint research that can just as easily be explained away by the average pedant(like me). Instead, one should focus on how best to exploit the complementary gender divide to best serve society, instead of trying to fit square pegs into round holes, which …
/r/MensRights21/07/15 04:57 PM
35

I think this result is to be expected given the task at hand. It's essentially a spatial intelligence task with a leadership/communication element mixed in. You are quite literally using a yardstick that skews heavily male, and represents a pretty large confounding variable. I do think that all Male teams tend to be task-oriented and competitive, which works well in fields that are "high pressure" or schedule/team based. If the measurement were something different, say a team of nurses being mea…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 03:01 PM
1

Next time just laugh and ignore or laugh and oblige while making fun of her. You're response was a bit too emotional for my tastes. You may have won the battle, but the cumulative effect of "butthurt" takes a toll when excersized over petty shit tests repeatedly. I would have just said something along the lines of, "I'll say a nice eulogy." I made the same mistakes when I first started unplugging. It is important to maintain proportionality of response to severity of shit test. Now, I see minor …
/r/MarriedRedPill20/07/15 02:52 PM
4

I think this is great, but young women are perhaps more in need of this message than young men.
/r/MarriedRedPill20/07/15 02:33 PM
2

If you are internally driven, then I agree, an Ivy League education and great job will get you further than driving a garbage truck, but if you are other-driven, it's just a fascade that the AWALT-basic chicks will sniff it out sooner or later. Chicks dig "power" because it signifies the best chances to reach the pinnacle of their dualistic AF/BB mating strategy, or the coveted Alpha Bux. However, don't for a second think they're slating you as anything but BB, and in fact, unless you're game is…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 03:15 PM
10

My wife read the first 3 chapters and put it down because, "This bitch is annoying, stupid, and ungrateful. She literally has no reason to get divorced." She ain't a unicorn, but damn is she redpill.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 02:50 PM
2

The funny thing is, the self-driven hippy is more redpill than the other-driven Ivy leaguer chasing "power." Plenty of Chads drive fucking garbage trucks for a living.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 02:45 PM
1

Stable nuclear family. Don't marry the product of divorce.
/r/MarriedRedPill16/07/15 05:26 PM
2

My honest opinion is to find a girl with a conservative upbringing and low partner count. I married a girl who was a virgin before me and grew up in a Catholic home headed by a Marine. She is naturally submissive and has 0 relationship baggage that isn't directly from me fucking up. She isn't a unicorn. She's a 7 with a good head on her shoulders and relatively sane. Her natural hypergamy is kept under strict control through internalization of Catholic guilt. She never rode the cock carousel bey…
/r/MarriedRedPill16/07/15 05:24 PM
2

Naw, Feminism would shit on both of them because "BB thinks she's his property" and "Chad is sleeping with her by deceiving her into thinking it's more than it is ipso facto RAPE"
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:14 PM
5

She comes from a culture that separates girls and boys. If you think that this school is a terrible thing, you are terrible.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:08 PM
80

"The command investigation, completed June 25 and obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, states that Germano displayed "toxic leadership" by publicly berating and showing contempt for subordinates, bullying Marines and singling them out for under-performance." Isn't that how basic training works?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:04 PM
1

The Bible is hella Redpill man, and back when everyone ran their marriages and love-lives on it, society was arguably better off for it. Male children had fathers, women didn't initiate divorce for trifles, and men were self-determining. The bible encourages men to be the best husband/father they can be by emulating "how Christ loved the church," which is being steady rock and willingly making sacrifices. Those teachings are in line with the High Alpha/High Beta dynamic that gets talked about in…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/07/15 03:47 PM
0

Take her to Catholic church every Sunday.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 06:12 PM
5

Catholic here. This part of the doctrine will never change. Catholicism is about as red pill as it gets, without all the amoral indulgence in the openly hypergamous culture that you see around here. If you want to get/stay married, find a nice conservative catholic girl.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 08:59 PM
1

It basically does this. The teacher in the credits is shown daydreaming about the same dude, whom she is going to visit during summer break.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:31 PM
0

I saw it. I found it pretty funny, especially through the redpill lens. Getting upset about it is BP, not Amused Mastery.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:29 PM
0

Poverty causes lower IQs, not race.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:39 PM
0

Don't you people have better things to worry about. Sometimes the MRM sub is just so petty.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:20 PM
2

They're all married.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:41 PM
1

I'd imagine this is true, but it's more dangerous to be a male civilian than a female civilian. Just look at the numbers on the war in Iraq.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:16 PM
1

If you're under 25 and conservative, you don't have a heart. If you're over 30 and liberal, you don't have a brain.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 01:57 PM
2

No, successful women can be totally beautiful. It's just doesn't add to their sexual attractiveness to have a successful career because men aren't hardwired that way nor are we socialized that way. Women are attractive because they have good genes, career or the trappings of wealth don't factor into that at all for the vast majority of men. Men are attracted to a pretty face, nice body, and pleasant dispositions. Women are attracted to pretty faces, nice bodies, and confident, "successful" looki…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 03:41 PM
1

Yes. That's exactly what I mean.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 02:18 PM
4

They don't create worth in the sexual marketplace by having a great career. Don't kid yourself.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:23 PM
2

Just remember these examples were cherry-picked. I'm sure there were people on campus that had solid reasons for supporting Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:15 PM
2

He's only 29. Can't.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:37 PM
5

" I was wrong about India, vasalgel is different stuff." It's not really different stuff. RISUG chemically changes after a few months. Parsemus elected to go with that chemical derivative RISUG naturally changes to in an effort to minimize risk of rejection by the FDA. This is still likely one of the safest clinical trials for reproductive technology you could ever hope to be in.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 04:46 PM
2

"By ALEX WILLIAMS FEB. 5, 2010" Dude, come on. This article is so old.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:12 PM
4

This. Men's Rights isn't a left/right issue.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:16 PM
0

Unequivocally yes.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:14 PM
3

Do you have a link for that study?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:08 PM
24

people defer to the man in a hardware store Except in the garden section.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:24 PM
39

You're overthinking it. If you're dating a man worth his salt, he will expect the occasional emotional melt-down. It's part of being a woman. The fact that you're self aware is 99% of the battle and med-school is stressful. Chill out, homegirl.
/r/RedPillWomen01/04/15 05:06 PM
3

I just want to point out the humor of "inspirational woman" being in in quotes in the headline. Veiled snark.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:41 PM
1

They don't cater to the majority as much as they attempt to minimize controversy to retain readership at all costs. This method gives loud political minorities undue sway.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:35 PM
2

Interesting article and premise, but a bit hyperbolic and heavy on the descriptive language.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/15 01:43 PM
3

Word. That is good motivation, I'm just not there yet with my side-hustle to where it's sustainable (not sure it ever will be).
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:16 PM
5

I was being sarcastic. Until there are major structural overhauls to employment law, there's no way the people who need sabbatical most will get enough off time unless they work for a really progressive tech company.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 05:51 PM
15

People can totally take off for 5 weeks at a time every two years. Nobody has a fulltime job they have to worry about.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 04:15 PM
1

He mad brah
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:35 PM
2

Thank you for being reasonable. The MRM should be against all genital mutilation, regardless of what it "prevents."
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:40 PM
1

Generic drugs? You realize that "generic" means that it's the same formulation as a name brand drug, right? Which means in the cases where "generic" drugs are being blocked from coming to market, it's because the original patents haven't expired. You can believe what you want about the drug market as it pertains to Vasalgel, your just wrong and I'm not going to continue wasting mental energy because the outcome will vindicate that you are a moron better than I can.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 03:29 PM
2

You are a cynical moron. First of all, the Parsemus Foundation is a non-profit organization that is trying to deliver this treatment at cost. They specifically bought the rights to the patent from the Indian guy because they didn't want it to be shelved by the for-profit drug companies. 2nd, Vasalgel will most definitely be approved once it gets through clinical trials, which they are slowly but surely working through. They've finished the rabbit study and now are approaching the end of their ba…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 04:04 PM
2

There is an epidemic of domestic abuse in the NFL!!!!
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:17 PM
70

All the more extraordinary is this henpecking because the women are only temporary burdens. In this perfect commune there is no permanent marriage. A man and a woman live together for just as long as they are individually so inclined. Either one may at any time change to another moloca, or perhaps just sling the hammock in another partition across the hall. So open hypergamy leads women to abuse the provider relationship? Color me surprised.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 02:28 PM
1

It's a student organization. I doubt they have much control.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:48 PM
1

You are inadvertently doxing this gearhardt guy. He is referred to by his last name in several instances. Please remedy this please.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:39 PM
7

Dude, mellow out. It's a fucking commercial.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:35 PM
1

This is incredibly interesting to me. I work in government military contracting, but have always been strictly a pacifist. There's a good deal of cognitive dissonance between my profession and political views. The fact that you've illuminated that many of these HuffPo contributors are likely in the same boat as me really humanizes the people pumping this stuff. They're essentially feeding the beast because "If I don't, someone else will, so I might as well get mine," an attitude I understand wel…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:28 PM
1

This will take care of itself when Vasalgel hits the market in a couple of years. http://www.parsemusfoundation.org/vasalgel-home/
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:17 PM
4

Do you really want to do Zumba? Pick your battles man.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:13 PM
3

That is true sociopathic behavior. Textbook.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:03 PM
1

AWALT bitch! I'm not bragging, I'm providing a heuristic for everyone else.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 02:17 PM
5

I don't really get what this author is trying to say. "The Pope says men and women are fundamentally different and complementary. He's a misogynist." Then he proceeds to ascribe protestant interpretations of the creation story onto the Catholic church. Catholicism openly believes in states the creation story isn't supposed to be taken literally, and the author peculiarly left out the church's teaching on they symbolic importance of being taken from the rib to illustrate the implicit equivalent d…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:02 PM
2

Lol. Ok, I'm a musician. Played in several bands across 4 different city scenes. The truth is that women just don't write music and put it out there at the same rate that men do. Additionally, women are always told they are awesome regardless of how good they are because A)some guys are inevitably trying to fuck them or B)They have throngs of "you'go'girl" groupies that wish they could be cool enough strum the same 5 chords over and over and sing on stage. The few chick-bands that have ever been…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:37 PM
35

Girls self esteem drops at puberty because other girls get really mean around that same time.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:17 PM
2

This^ Treat her as a work associate.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 08:45 PM
3

Dude, this family is likely very red pill and very catholic(which is the most red pill mainstream branch of christian). This woman is embracing her natural role as a caregiver. Also, believe it or not, the time investment per kid doesn't really go up on a day to day basis from 3+ because as kids get older they need less supervision.| Your irrational anger about this is pretty BP. Newsflash, the dad in this situation is probably pretty Alpha because women don't want to have countless children wit…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 08:42 PM
1

Did I attack men? No. This woman basically agreed with the sentiments of this sub, and merely because she posted a gender neutral short-list that somewhat aligned with a few feminist talking points (issues that also happen to be problems worth solving), OP decided dismiss her. I'm not sure how you could possibly misconstrue that I'm here to attack men and defend ludicrous feminist ideas, seeing as I've been a poster in this sub for 3 years over two separate accounts (deleted the 1st one because …
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:28 PM
-1

Reproductive rights do need to be protected in this country. She wants family leave to be universal. She does not add gender to sexual violence, and it does need to be fought. So you're basically exhibiting the male arrogance she's talking about right now, and being guilty of everything she's railing against in the article, but in reverse for feminism instead of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:56 PM
2

My only issue with this article is that it basically makes the same claim over and over again. I believe it, but it's repetitive.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:35 PM
3

I thought that was in Canada?
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 06:30 PM
4

Prime example, a group of like 1500 entitled twitter twats complaining about isolated incidents with the #yesallwomen hashtag was hamstered into a "representative" sample by the blogosphere ladies of Jezebel and Buzzfeed, then promoted through Facebook social networks to reach an absurdly central location in the national news cycle.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 02:40 PM
2

I was going to say the same thing, Wesley never breaks frame, wheras Humperdink is a little entitled beta bitch.
/r/MarriedRedPill29/12/14 02:56 PM
0

Luckily, I learned that skill dealing with my mother growing up. She was always going crazy around the holidays and I learned the best way to diffuse was to ignore and redirect.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/12/14 03:55 PM
4

I wouldn't even really call this a shit-test. A good use of humor, but smelling pants and advising on whether she can wear them again isn't a shit-test, it's advice seeking. I just read that she was in a mood. Diffusing the grumpiness is solid redirection of frame.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/12/14 03:38 PM
2

It's probably going to cost a lot less than $1000.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 08:12 PM
3

Big pharma wants to shelf it because it's cheap and costs less to make than the syringe that administers it. Also, Parsemus wants to keep the cost as low as possible so that access isn't affected by cost.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 08:12 PM
11

Just don't? You're making mountains out of molehills. It's ok to listen to suggestions from your 1st mate as long as it isn't non-negotiable.
/r/MarriedRedPill10/12/14 08:30 PM
1

Hey man, at least you're trying. Obviously, what you're doing is working and you forced some introspection through holding frame. Just remember, the wife wants you to pass, and it's easier to pass when you tweak the parameters of your frame (also, not all gals are the same, just because this works with my wife doesn't mean it works with everyone).
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 09:30 PM
1

What do you think people did in the 80's?
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 06:29 PM
2

You could have passed that shit test at Smashburger way easier by just making fun of her for being cranky when she's hungry, pat her on the head, and let it go at that. Humor works way better because it actively addresses bad behavior in a way that points out it's ridiculousness and encourages your LTR to join in ridiculing the irrational hamster instead of leaving her to brood about how "She isn't being treated right."
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 06:21 PM
1

Yeah, I'm just lumping it in together. Although I've found that pull-ups also helps with my grip.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 09:59 PM
1

I've always been taught to and tried to have a good handshake. Pro-tip for those waifs that are just getting started: It's important to make sure that as part of your lifting routine, you include some form of exercise that strengthens your wrists. Despite my best intentions to leave a first impression, my wrists used to pop occasionally when I was shaking hands. I'm sure this left a shit impression and I used beat myself up about it. I still cringe at my first handshake with some of my superiors…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 04:00 PM
2

Go back to /r/conspiracy
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:07 PM
7

Word. I'll give that a read. I think we're basically of the same mind here.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/14 08:38 PM
8

It's not a matter of moralistic perspective. It's a matter of effort, time, and sacrifice vs. the goals one wants to achieve. I'm not saying that there isn't some truth and applicable lessons in the 48 laws of power. I'm saying that the fetishization and relentless pursuit of the "dark triad" archetype by the average redpill dude is going to have some adverse outcomes, especially for those who aren't already sociopaths (whom this behavior comes naturally to). What you sacrifice is meaningful int…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/14 07:56 PM
41

I'm pretty amused by the whole romanticization of the whole "dark triad" thing. First of all, the term as it's defined really only applies to the tippy top .1% of all dudes, and even then only to the ones who also happen to be sociopaths. It sounds like a lonely, unhappy existence for very little fulfillment. I personally will settle for being top 10% with power over my life instead of top .1% wasting mental energy scheming against everybody else. The whole 48 laws of power movement that seems t…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/14 05:36 PM
2

The catholic church is actually very redpill. I actually started attending conversion classes the same time I found the Red Pill and I'm actually getting really into the overlapping value systems. The catholic church doctrine on gender is based on the duality of the sexes and reflects that accordingly in it's teachings.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 06:36 PM
13

Before the red pill was even a thing, this always screwed me. I've never had trouble attracting women I'm not interested in. Starting in late middle-early highschool, I had the realization that it was much harder to attract the girls I was really interested in. This is because I was showing interest, but also passive because I was afraid of messing up. I would become this shadow of who I normally was around gals, which was confident, indifferent, and flirtatious.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 06:27 PM
1

I agree. I initially thought that TRP was a little to extreme, but that was just the angry folks. The thing I like most about TRP is that it has made me focus on being the best person I can be with the hand I've been dealt, not whine about society to people who aren't listening/don't care and then retreating to the echo chamber. Reading MensRights for the past 3 years has given me nothing. 3 months of TRP has yielded tangible results, put me in touch with my masculinity, and has me pursuing my d…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:25 PM
2

That's pretty interesting. I'm looking into the difference between white & grey matter and it makes sense that men would have more grey than women speaking in evolutionary terms. Could you provide a source for the differences in brain composition of men and women? I always want to smack people who say that male and female brains aren't different, and I'd like to make sure I'm not quoting made up statistics.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:37 PM
12

I mean, Nidoking is the best fucking pokemon. It can learn water, electric, poison, and fire moves. It's strong as fuck, and only weak against a few types of pokemon. Nidoqueen is a waste of a fucking moonstone. I mean, if they're trying to distill gender activism into a framework that 8 year old me would understand, they've really made me want to be MRA. The feminists should be Koffing, or Weezing. They float around, obscuring reality with their smoke and poisoning everything they come near as …
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:42 PM
4

He'd have to have legal standing, which he doesn't. The suspended guy would have to make that complaint.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 01:51 PM
1

Thank you for posting something positive here. For all you MGTOW types, maybe you ought to consider something like this.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 03:44 PM
2

Who cares? Private company and freezing eggs is expensive. Freezing sperm is cheap, and the male biological clock is much less of a problem.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:53 PM
2

This. Be a man of action, not a little whiny bitch.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:14 PM
6

I honestly don't think Warren is that dangerous because it isn't her primary platform. Claire McCaskill is hands down the most dangerous senator for men's issues.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:50 PM
2

Dude, you should inform yourself. Even if insurance decides not to cover it, parsemus foundation is a NOn-profit. This will hit the market AT COST. The gel injection costs less than the syringe to administer it does. Quit bitching and pay your copay of 25-100 bucks when the time comes.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:31 PM
2

You've never been inside any southern churches then. My liberal Presbyterian church had a balance of female and male clergy, sunday school teachers, and deacons/elders, and was never hostile towards men working with children, including teenage boys working in the nursery. Churches provide a lot of benefit when you go to one that focuses on the right things. Also, as an aside, everybody who says they didn't need a church to instill morality in them either have never been in a church or are trying…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:42 PM
1

Can you source the data on 1/7 male teachers being falsely accused? I'd really like to verify that one way or another, so I can add it to my talking points.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:27 PM
1

This is a good talk. Why is it unlisted?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:27 PM
20

Just watch any episode of Shark Tank, almost all of the female entrepreneurs have a business based on fulfilling a need by using existing technologies. About half of them are fashion businesses of some sort, and another 20% is a food business. I can only really remember 2 female inventors that had anything worth a damn, and both of them had to do with making it easier to deal with their kids. Ava the elephant was a "fun" pill dispenser and the other was some kind of baby-sling with multiple func…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:16 PM
2

Did you read his breakdown? It shows tradcons are only 6% of the WAF movement. Most of the dialogue is oriented towards equality, followed by Men's Rights and anti-"feminist rhetoric".
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:05 PM
3

I'd really love it if Bane666 would just disappear. His videos with the skull in a pitcher full of blood is really not selling anybody. His shit is always boring, petty, not well thought out and often misogynist.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:02 PM
11

You and me both. I always get downvoted for trying to calm people down and pointing out the flaws in that type of thinking. I just try to amplify the reasonable voices here and downvote the inanity.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:16 PM
3

I almost wish this would happen to me so I could be a crusader against the inequality and dubious Title IX enforcement and make bank. I don't see how he could possibly lose this lawsuit.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:13 PM
1

I agree. Unless it's a pop-culture icon, this is hardly going to make a splash outside of the "gender war" echo chamber
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:52 PM
-2

I still haven't had it articulated why exactly this is a rights issue. I'm pissed off because people like you and others in this thread are whining about how women don't like "nice" guys. You can't change it, culturally or legislatively, and all these damn comments make the casual lurker that happens upon this subreddit believe all the shit they hear about MRAs being a bunch of can't-get-laid-angry-whitemen<sup>tm</sup> I'm so sick of reading posts by people uncritically waxing poetic about mino…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:26 PM
-4

Oh my god you ass, did you not read the comment by /u/marcruise? It's a study that looks at responsiveness in perception of one's gender traits (masculine vs. feminine) and that men found women who were responsive to be "more feminine" and thus more sexually attractive. Duh. Men are attracted to women who may bang them. Women on the other hand, showed no strong correlation one way or the other, indicating that women base their attraction not on interest, but other traits. Nowhere in the study do…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:04 PM
-5

Still not a rights issue. What legislation are you intending to pass? Anti-mean words laws? Civil rights are ensured through legislation. Attraction is not a right. The pontification about it from hopelessly un-laid men and women because they have a warped sense of reality is a right.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:42 PM
2

Thank you for breaking this down for all of us. Also, can we all agree that biological patterns of attraction are not a rights issue please? Women can't help what they're attracted to, and while a chunk of it is cultural, attraction is largely is rooted in instinctual responses to displays of body language and the genes affecting your face.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:44 PM
3

Poor white people vote republican.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:04 PM
2

I mean, it IS a MORAL OUTRAGE that such a terribly written piece of shit got turned into a movie! Just have a look at some of the wonderfully written dialogue by the fat, middle-aged, barely highschool educated fan fiction author: “I want you to become well acquainted, on first name terms if you will, with my favorite and most cherished part of my body. I’m very attached to this.” Who talks about their dick like that? Nobody! “My inner goddess is doing the merengue with some salsa moves.” “My in…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:06 PM
1

Boom, this! I love the rational thinkers of this sub!
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:56 PM
2

Wrong, it is about incentives. The law allowed for shared parenting time, but it wasn't taken advantage of until incentives were introduced, likely because men were out earning their partners and had a high workload they were unwilling to part with. Once they were incentivized to take their leave, the man increasingly began to use it until it became viewed as socially unacceptable not to (I distinctly remember reading an article about this trend, but I don't care to google for it.)
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:54 PM
6

That's not going to happen dude. MGTOW would have to happen on way to large a scale for it to be successful, and to many men (myself included) like being in a marriage. If men just got their act together and lobbied for better family court laws, it would fix half of the men's issues overnight and negate the root cause for the MGTOW movement. MGTOW is doomed to failure because it'll never reach critical mass and it's also REALLY REALLY bad for society to not have pretty close to sustainment level…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:04 PM
7

I agree, while I disagreed with some of what she says, I think this is a step in the right direction. Instead of deriding and ridiculing her, we should focus on what she said that is good. At least she's thinking about it instead of spouting talking points.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:01 PM
1

/r/intactivists is what he/she means
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:47 PM
1

This story is about women who are unable to support themselves in the true patriarchy of the Middle East. One of the women in this article had her child starve because she wasn't able to provide. The loss of a husband in this part of the world, where marriage is still deeply tied to their economic system, is disastrous for a wife. A husband will be sad, but still able to support his family and remarry. Stop making an issue where there is none.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:45 PM
5

Am I the only one who doesn't see a problem with idealizing physical fitness. As long as it doesn't cause a dysmorphia, I don't see why it's an issue to want to be physically fit. It's good for your health.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:30 PM
1

This should be stickied.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:28 PM
3

This is pretty comprehensive. If I was in an abusive marriage (which thankfully, I'm not) I would consult this guide.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 03:42 PM
2

I really have no issues with most of these campaigns because they don't put men down. Why do we care if a company whose target demographic specifically precludes men as primary consumers markets towards girls by emphasizing self esteem? I get the #banbossy hate. It's disingenous, but the "don't say sorry" or don't get upset when someone tells you you do thinks #likeagirl is fine. Simmer down folks.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 06:21 PM
-1

I do assume that, but it would behoove us to make it as clear as possible for outside visitors to the sub. Semantics, context and tone matter and balanced rhetoric brings people to your side. Overgeneralizations and anger only rile up the people who already think like us, and really reminds me of the radfems we love to hate on around here. I personally don't want the MHRM to look anything like radical feminism, language and tone included. A certain subset of users on this sub always get upset wi…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:16 PM
-2

Just being a pedant here, but can you please refrain from saying the blanket "women" and say "some women" instead. I understand and agree with your sentiment, but by casting a blanket statement over all women, you are weakening your argument.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:45 PM
1

So, I don't know if any of you have heard of Greenhouse but it is a great browser plugin to see where political money flows. Senator Claire McCaskill had "Lawyers/Law Firms" & "Women's Groups" make up two of the top three donor groups accounting for about 3.5 million for her 1 term in office. So she represents insitutional feminist organizations like NOW who want the cash-cow to keep on rolling, and we have the lawyers who profit when it gets easier to litigate. More prosecutions, more civil lit…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:36 PM
2

I lived with a city prosecutor (mostly did DUIs) and I can anecdotaly confirm this. I'm a devil's advocate kind of guy, and he's told me on more than one occasion that he likes to strike anybody similar to me during the selection phase.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:32 PM
1

You're an idiot. I defended George Will's article on multiple subs. I don't care if you put down liberals, I care if you don't know what you're talking about. Please excuse me for trying to make sure MRAs don't sound retarded, I just want our movement to succeed, not flounder in idiocy.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 01:58 PM
1

Dude, you're over opinionated and under-informed. First: The term neo-liberalism isn't referring to the modern "Librullz." It's applying the original liberalist economic thought (such as Adam Smith) to the modern global economy. Second: Hayek and Friedman are influential 20th century economists from the Austrian school of thought. This worldview is basically the counter-argument to Keynesian economic(leftists) thought. Neoliberalism is all about deregulating global markets (right wing talking po…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 01:56 PM
1

You fucking serious? I'm a dude. I get more downvotes from Twox than upvotes, and if you bothered to look past the first page of my post history you would see that I post in /r/mensrights and /r/cfb far more than TwoX. Tell me how privatization of public resources, deregulation, and reduction in government spending is a liberal talking point please.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 01:45 PM
4

This word, neo-liberal, I don't think it means what you think it means. I just think it's funny that the author of this article is basically doing the exact same thing by using an economic term describing conservative, small goverment, globalized, free market enterprise to mean "leftists that are under the age of 20." Let's keep the discourse around here to a uniform academic standard. Let's not appropriate words that mean something completely different (like, say, the word trigger) because we l…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:05 PM
2

Big pharma has tried to buy the patent, but the inventor of RISUG wouldn't sell because he wanted it to be available and affordable. BP wants to shelve this because it would basically eliminate +50% of the hormonal BC market. P.s. thanks for downvoting me douchebag. Im sorry you're over opinionated and underinformed, but you shouldn't take it out on me.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:36 AM
1

Vasalgel is not big pharma. It is a crowdfunded social venture to be sold at cost of production, distribution, and a modestly small administratitive overhead. Check your cynacism, shitlord!
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:10 AM
6

This is really bad.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:51 PM
2

Wow, how unsubstantiated!
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:49 PM
4

No, he's right. I'm anti-circ, but this is a rubbish social science article. It's not hard in this era to site your sources and this article doesn't. It probably does have a correlation, but not directly from circumcision. Controlling for confounding variables is critical, especially to social science research. Failing to do so results in bad statistics, which can be more harmful than no statistics at all because bad statistics lead to bad policy.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 03:36 PM
0

Unless you post the text of the bill being considered, I refuse to get up in arms. Just because the Daily Fail framed it as an issue against women, doesn't mean the enacted law won't be gender neutral. Unfortunately I'm under informed on British law, but in the US, even if the law was directed at one gender, one could easily challenge it's constitutionality based on the 14th amendment. Also, lets face it, while sexual assault may be more evenly distributed between genders, women ARE the primary …
/r/MensRights02/07/14 03:30 PM
1

Thanks for being open to being wrong. that's ultimately what will set us apart from traditional gender movements.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:13 PM
17

This is a stupid article. Does anyone remember Oz? Pretty grizzly. Let's not play the victim card folks. Also, OiNTB is awesome.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:05 PM
9

Orange is the New Black is a internet series with no adverts. I also think it is awesome, and don't understand the negative ink it's getting.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:04 PM
-1

Lawsuits are a bigger deterrent than jailtime for public institutions with limited budgets such ad public schools. Administrators have been the ones making the final decisions on these issues. The incentives have just been 100% reversed from a risk management standpoint. If you think people won't respond to that (a guaranteed lawsuit and loss of employment) then what makes you think they'll respond to possible jailtime?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 06:44 PM
2

Quit with your bullshit victimization complex. We wanted this legislation passed. It got passed. There is nothing else to be done. You advocating for harsh sentences to "teach 'em a lesson for past wrongs" is the exact same kind of bullshit that feminists use to advocate for bad legislation affecting men. It has been remedied in the state of Florida and just because it doesn't fulfill your revenge fantasy doesn't mean it doesn't go far enough. Take your extremism somewhere else.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:29 PM
10

Why make it a felony? That has got to be one of the stupidest thing I've ever heard on this sub. A misdemeanor maybe, but the truth is that this law will protect students from 0 tolerance just fine because the breaking the law will mean lawsuits that the administrators don't want to fight. You really want to throw somebody in jail over this and waste taxpayer money to do so? Honestly, the whole reason things got so bad in the first place was because these teachers are covering their asses. You c…
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:13 PM
4

Ehh, its just like a tea party for this little girl. It's a game. Children this young play and pretend to try out adult roles in safe environments. I think its cute. The video was kind of cheesy, but I think the idea od these dates can be a valuable, fun way to bomd with your kid while emulating the kind of date you'd want them to go on.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:15 PM
1

No, they wouldn't. They are not consciously omitting confounding variables, they are unconsciously ignoring or neglecting to look for them. In otherwords, they say, "I want to find X." They should say, "I'm interested in X, I wonder if Y factors into this? Could there maybe be a Z I'm not thinking of?" They most likely are not saying, "I'm interested in X, but I'm concerned that Y will mess up my hypothesis and Z just makes interpreting the data too hard so I just won't bother with the other var…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:10 PM
0

I mean, all disciplines are trained to look for data to support their hypotheses, it's just that you should also be taught the importance of spurious and confounding variables. I don't think it's a conscious effort, which is why it's so hard to reason with them.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:21 PM
0

Now feminists come along and say hey lets compare sole female attackers vs sole male attackers, because they know this will misrepresent the data. I'm pretty sure this isn't a conscious effort. I think its far more likely that "Gender Studies" departments have very poor statistical pedagogies and the studies are informed by ideology. In other words, the feminist researchers are not trained to control for confounding variables. They are trained to look for data to support their hypothesis, but no…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:51 PM
-3

This comment is so stupid. Either your a moron or your a kid who hasn't yet figured out that there is no nefarious conspiracy, just ignorance and lack of critical thought. The plan of feminists is simply to pursue privilege and power for women. They think they are leveling the playing field, but they are oblivious to the negative consequences of their policies. edit: Thanks grammar folks for pointing out my careless mistake that everybody makes. I unfortunately did not have a proof reader for my…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:04 PM
1

She actually was a judge in NYC family court.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:19 PM
1

Am I the only one who really hates these videos? If you don't want to put your face out there, why the skull in the Kool-Aid pitcher? It doesn't exactly scream, "I'm serious, have good points, and should be listened to!"
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:53 PM
15

The question I have is why they think that the 14th amendment doesn't apply to them.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:15 AM
9

x-post this to /r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:53 PM
1

I've actually had this exact same conversation with my wife recently and this is the conclusion we came to.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:31 PM
2

You obviously never watch Maddow. She's liberal yeah, but she's also intelligent, reports facts, and fair.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:04 PM
1

LOL at NOW's 1st goal. We have section 1 of the 14th amendment: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction th…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:36 PM
2

It's definitely big fish, small pond housewives from small town, red state America. It's the ones who were their first in their family to go to college, majored in early childhood education, and married an engineer or business major and have some money now compared to the rest of their town and they want to make their children sound trendy & rich, all without realizing that the names actually sound like gibberish. I'm normally not a fan of generalizing from experience, but only ever lived in urb…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:30 PM
1

Word. So that's a 3% chance out of whatever the statistic that a man will be accused (of rape) is (out of malice). Now for the record, I think that number is probably too low, because I don't think the vast majority of men are accused of S.A. at any point in time, but I think it's probably closer to 10% of whatever the accusation rate is.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:09 PM
1

1/10 is not a real statistic. I'd like to see you back that up. Let's not hyperbolise here folks.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:12 PM
7

What a quack.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:06 PM
10

Seriously, Feminism didn't become a supremacist movement until the late 60's early 70's with the introduction of anger to the movement. Suffragettes were quite concerned with equality before the law.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 01:17 PM
1

Cool it with the anger man. He's merely trying to point out that two wrongs don't make a right, and it would be hypocritical to enforce some kind of quota. One thing Feminism did get right (the first time around) was that encouragement can boost interest in activities that trend more sexually homogeneous. I think we should encourage both than to do something that can be as damaging as Title IX reform.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 04:22 PM
11

Change.org is slacktivism at it's worst. 95% of the time the petitions on those are poorly worded about things that cannot be changed.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:27 PM
17

You could really sue for Title IX violations because: *Per their own rules, the Dean’s Office would not share any exploratory evidence, but reserves the right to review any evidence they obtain and “use it as seemed fit.” They also refused any power of subpoena. This became a huge deal, because it turned out I had precedent over my accuser, having contacted the campus police first. When I disclosed this claim, the Dean’s Office contacted the police to vet the story. When these events were confir…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:14 PM
1

Thanks, I realize that feeding the trolls is bad, but I also feel the need to provide a counter-narrative so that the people who end up here from r/random realize this viewpoint isn't widely accepted (if at all) here. You're response was more effective though.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:57 PM
2

The troll is strong with this one. This reads like a plant by somebody trying to make this group sound extreme. If you really feel this way and all this really happened, you must be extremely good looking and charming because theres no way that a new woman would fuck you with cum already in them every night unless you gave off pheremones in a 5-mile radius, had the body of someone out of 300, and obviously had a shit ton of intelligence. Judging from the writing style and general misogyny(and I …
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:43 PM
2

Wrong, this study, just like the statistics from the 90s only further muddies the water. The goal should be better due process, not more restrictive and draconian rules regarding intimacy. I don't want women to be subjected to the same kangaroo courts as college men, and you shouldn't either. Instead of taking an eye for an eye, we should focus on replacing what was lost, not removing freedoms. This article could be used to illustrate that operational definitions are fuzzy and methodology is que…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:12 PM
-3

This is an article about income disparities at a border. Please don't distort the purpose of this piece to fit the MRM narrative by focusing on the gender of the group they are writing about. It's disingenuous and dehumanizes REAL human suffering. Attempting to equate developing nations with industrial nations in terms of gender politics is kind of disgusting to me (something Tumblr Feminists love to do), and these women obviously are working in backbreaking conditions to eek out an existence. I…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:52 PM
2

The MRM is in a similar point in time. We're just now reaching the point in which the backlash has grown to the point in which the bystanders in the gender discussion are actually looking into the notion that "racism and sexism" pervade our movement and finding out that it does not exist in any significant fashion. We have idealogues that are giving talks in University settings, a growing presence on-line, and even a 20/20 special that got canned because they found out that the MRM isn't actuall…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:44 PM
22

So much this.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:53 PM
6

I don't give a fuck. I'm responsible for my situation because I did nothing to stop it. That is not rape, that's regret. I am in charge of my own destiny. I wasn't held down or forced, I didn't even try to stop what happened to me. I refuse to accept that I was victimized by anything other than my own lack of self-discipline, assertiveness, and judgement.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:29 PM
15

It's because OP changed what the study said. The headline in /r/Science is "unwanted sexual encounters" which includes men who aren't assertive in their non-consent. I would be in this group, because lost my virginity in just such an encounter. I was drunk, I didn't really want to, but I did it anyway and gave implicit consent by not stopping her. We need to be sure not to equate the findings of this study to "rape." While rape is included in the findings, it is not the majority.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:24 PM
-2

That would never fucking happen. Don't be a douche.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 01:44 PM
2

That's my jams...
/r/MensRights10/02/14 02:19 AM
1

"It's his interpretation of French culture - a very biased view," For real? An American student is telling a French native PhD who has written an extremely successful curriculum used at 1000 universities that she knows his culture better than him.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:15 PM
3

You and the Honey Badger crew have gotten really adept at boiling down the issue into palatable and digestible soundbites. This is great!
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:12 PM
1

It's a fucking joke song. Jokes are ok. This is like getting upset about "Dick in a Box"
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:08 PM
2

I think it's a troll post intended to make the MRM look antagonistic to equality. /u/rushlimbos is a brand new account with one post. THIS article. This is hornswaggle, downvote at will.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 03:42 PM
1

Lou Lou
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:43 PM
1

He's a handsome guy. Get over it. He doesn't mind or he wouldn't have made the video.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:40 PM
2

This can't be real, and if it is, let her call 911. The police will say, "ok kid." and not show up.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:35 PM
-1

The general bitterness that comes from the MGTOW and seperatist vibe. The goal is becoming equals with women, not avoiding them altogether.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:07 PM
2

OMG. The reasonableness of it all. I may never come back here.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:20 PM
-3

I'd add the MGTOW crowd to that bunch.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:03 PM
3

I don't really care WHO makes this their issue as long as it gets solved.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 03:33 PM
1

With statistics.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 05:44 PM
6

Here's the thing, who possesses porn these days anyway. You can stream it all and never truly be in possession. If you're living in the UK and worried about your porn habits, just stream it from the myriad of free sites and delete your cookies.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 05:24 PM
2

I'm sorry, this article is retarded. I thought it was going to make some point about Lena Dunham portraying pathetic sub-par single women as heroes and the men as jackasses. It's just a right winger bitching that women desire bodily and sexual autonomy and they're voting for democrats because the Republican party is too fucking stupid to realize that the "conservative" approach would be to get out of peoples fucking personal lives. This slop shouldn't be in this sub.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 02:58 PM
2

I don't know, he's not really a catch either. Look at that long scragly hair. Women do not exactly swoon over guys like him.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 02:26 PM
3

That case was equally, if not more, infuriating. At least this Schorr character seems to have the education and financial ability to fight back.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 10:04 PM
2

This was hard to watch.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:46 PM
2

Homegirl rocks.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:07 PM
1

Of course! I hope I have boys so I can play with Legos again.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 02:59 PM
2

Reading is important.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 02:55 PM
0

Well, let's not be intellectually dishonest. If it weren't for feminism, women would still be in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant, and the MRM likely wouldn't have started because the genders would be equally entrenched in gender roles. Feminism created a disparity of freedoms between the genders, which served as the catalyst for the exploration of the ideas presented in this sub. Modern feminists that oppose the MRM, of course, don't realize that this is the logical outcome that they were hopi…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 02:36 PM
1

The language is a bit vitriolic, but he really nailed it. It's unfortunate because his language is going to preclude certain individuals who might be open to the POV from reading.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:36 PM
2

Thomas Kuhn explored the subjectivity of science in this seminal work 50 years ago. Ever heard the word "paradigm" thrown around by idealogues? The concept of paradigm thought came from this book about science, not from post-modern social sciences. This was one of the chief books in my contemporary political theory course in college.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:24 PM
1

In family court fucking things up for men.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:02 PM
2

Nor do we sue other people who grow mustaches.:) :^ { ) FTFY
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:50 PM
-45

This isn't a Men's Rights issue, it's a case of police overstepping their boundaries when enforcing public indecency laws. This guy will win his lawsuit. It's fine.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:28 PM
6

This comic was likely made and posted by somebody who never played sports.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:52 PM
0

Foreign correspondents do make more, including per diem and hazard pay on top of their regular salary. Some feminists whining in a corner of the internet doesn't change that fact.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:29 PM
1

There is nothing you can do to make being a war-time correspondent safer. Take into account that often these journalists willingly put themselves in harm's way against the wishes of the local authorities and the news agencies that support them. This is one step below saying, "Let's make being a soldier safer." I'm all for workplace safetey in other male professions like forestry or crab-fishing, but often the folks who get injured are the young bucks that take risks.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:29 PM
1

Men are more likely to chose being a foreign correspondent in a war zone. This is a choice. Let's stop trying to equate personal choice with discrimination. This is a useful statistic to trot out every time a woman says "It's dangerous being a woman journalist." Beyond that, this is horseshit.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 10:46 PM
1

YESSSSSSSSSS! They are not eating our cake. Women's issues aren't illegitimate.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:08 PM
4

Did they use incognito mode? Otherwise they were in their own search bubble which is influenced by the sites they visit, the emails they write, and the likes/retweets of their social media accounts. Fuck these 18-19 year olds that probably made this video as a project for women's studies 101. Very few people that age ever knows what the fuck they're talking about (I was the same way) and generally lack the life experience to be objective.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:07 PM
9

I'm sorry, but this analogy doesn't really work in China. The real issue (if you assume this behaviour isn't an isloated case) is that China is a buyers market for women. That means that men are willing to put up with almost anything to have a relationship with a woman because there is such a surplus of men. If this were a western country, I could see your point... Actually, no I can't. This kind of behavior was around long before Feminism.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:46 PM
5

Ok. I am not a fan of "pay parity." You get what you're worth. Attractive male models aren't used to sell that wide a range of products. Look at any male OR female magazine and check the adverts. Beautiful women are used to sell the majority of products to both men AND women and are usually the center of the ad. With more adverts needing women, there are more opportunities for models. This means to attract top female modeling talent, you need to pay more, since there are an abundance of other op…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:06 PM
11

I think it would be wise to keep people with such overt bias from ever being in charge of any prosecution or defense as they've shown that they don't mind lying to receive a verdict.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:34 PM
2

I think that is only part of the issue. Fixing the income issue would only solve the problem for a small portion of men who would otherwise become teachers. You have to realize that: A) There aren't a lot of men who would enjoy being primary teachers. We talk all the time on this sub that there is some level of biological proclivity to certain areas of the workforce for men and women, and that even in countries where the government attempted to mitigate these natural tendencies, there was little…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:15 PM
2

Gannondorf has green skin. Pretty sure that's racist against illegal aliens...
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:05 PM
1

I'm going to write a bot to see how much shit gets upvoted. It'd be fun to do this for /r/feminism to just to see what kind of bullshit gets upvoted.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 04:48 PM
-1

This guy is kind of stupid.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 04:43 PM
-2

The few youngish people that do arrive here, and hang around for any length of time, appear most often to want either to avoid actually criticising feminism, and especially if it involves any blaming of women in general, or to *engage in pointless semantics that take up far too much of my limited time in order to impress with their aspie high IQs. * Ok bro. Fuck you. Semantics matter. As a young-ish guy who has been hanging around for a good 2 years or more now, I'm deeply concerned about keepin…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:09 PM
5

I'd say there is more debate than policing within the community.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:39 PM
25

The problem with this type of research for both MGM and FGM is that the people who live in communities where the practice is prominent already have low transmission rates. This is because they represent largely religious communities (read muslims) that already have strong taboos against promiscuity (read stoning to death). So yeah, male and female circumcision is totally correlated with lower HIV rates, but that is because of cultural factors, not health benefits..
/r/MensRights30/09/13 01:16 PM
5

I'm so excited to see what the rabid feminists are going to provide this time in the way of public vitriol. If you are attending, or know somebody attending, please remember not to yell. Speak calmly, and record the interaction. Post it on YouTube, email it to the honey badger crew, and blog it on Tumblr. I'm from Birmingham, AL. The biggest reason the Civil Rights Movement succeeded is because the world saw the horrible behavior of a bigoted group against non-violent protestors and were horrifi…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:43 PM
1

This is like African Americans turning on Bill Cosby. Here is a woman who has become successful despite the "inequalities and injustice" present in the system, yet her advice is scorned because she is a "traitor."
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:21 PM
2

She may have a son. She may be familiar with the way the system is flawed. She may be a powerful champion for the cause.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:11 PM
32

I wonder how Kate is doing. I always hated that bitch way before they got divorced.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:31 PM
1

What does she want people to write about? People don't start bands to sing about blades of grass or puppies. 99.9999% of people write music for 3 reasons: Religion, politics, or the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:27 PM
2

Yeah, OP definitely hasn't done his research. This is actually a great poster, uses humor, and is made by men for men. OK in my book.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:20 PM
1

I'm not backpedaling, I'm being realistic. I'm 100% for men's rights, but not at the expense of the truth. That would make us no better than brainwashed feminists.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:04 PM
1

Who's the CEO? Who are the shareholders? Who are the general managers? Guaranteed 90%+ are men, not women, which makes this argument all the less relevant to the original article and this thread. Did you forget what we were originally talking about?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:36 PM
0

Again... relevance?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:30 PM
2

Further, men do earn more on average and we have a progressive tax system so men pay the majority of taxes. Again, this is a means test, not a gender issue. You can if you're a woman, or at least you have a much more reasonable expectation to be able to. I agree, but that doesn't take away choices, just makes them unconventional.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:25 PM
3

That is not even the context of this thread. When did this sub fill up with idiots? It used to be pretty reasonable around here, now it's just like those god-damned "victims" of the patriarchy the feminists act like. Yes, family courts are biased. I think it's bullshit. That isn't what we're arguing about here. Men aren't forced to be miners. Men aren't forced to be engineers. Regardless of what you do, you get paid for it. Stop trying to inject a completely separate argument into the scope of t…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:22 PM
2

Right, but that choice is distributed throughout the entire population, both male/female. Men aren't taxed at a different rate, therefore their income, and how they chose to acquire it, is essentially the same as females. OP is arguing that women are cracking the whip as slave-drivers. They aren't doing that any more than men are making women stay in the kitchen. That argument, like every popularized feminist argument, absolves one gender of agency. Fuck that. I'm an agent of change if I want to…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:27 PM
2

Bring on the Matrix references! You have now lost what little credibility I was willing to give you.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:21 PM
1

This post is proof that some of us are grasping at straws for issues. Please people, let's be reasonable. She's a comedian. She told jokes. That's her job. This sub can't get upset about Tosh getting in trouble for rape jokes and turn around and bitch about Ellen DeGeneres (one of the very few funny women comedians) making light-hearted fun of a ridiculous product. Chill bros.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:48 PM
33

I'm pretty sure working = paycheck. Let's not be hyperbolic. It is not slavery. You have a fucking choice. Don't be the male version of a whiny feminist.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 02:51 PM
5

To be fair, Circ isn't that common in the UK
/r/MensRights17/09/13 01:48 PM
32

I can see how he thinks women are smarter than him. Everyone must be smarter than him.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 01:24 PM
1

The people who got conned should be thrown in jail for being stupid.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 03:06 PM
2

I mean, replace "Government" with "Republicans" and it is sort of true.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:08 PM
4

Which is ironic, because they all chose to be gender studies majors.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:40 PM
1

Obviously, you were affected because you didn't learn the difference between effect and affect....
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:46 PM
2

I mean, he's pretty average looking. But you can tell from his smile that he's friendly and means no harm. Also, he was with a girl so there's the whole not being the lone wolf thing.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 04:17 PM
-5

I think MGTOWs are damaged the same way the "man-haters" of the 60's/early 70's feminist movement are/were. I think it's an extreme position to take, and doesn't help build consensus towards fixing issues. From the videos I've seen and the voices from the movement, it appears to be broken down into two distinct camps: 1)Socially awkward guys that have for one reason or another come into some money and been screwed in a bad relationship because as part of their malformed social skills, did not le…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 07:51 PM
-11

REEEEEEEEEPOST!
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:58 PM
6

God, this is why I hate this sub sometimes. Some of you are a bunch of bitch-ass cunts that can't/won't attempt to understand women. Because of this, people like you only attract the broken ones because no mentally balanced woman would ever be attracted to someone oozing such negative vibes. So you sit here on the internet and give pseudo-SRS woman hating advice and point to any dumb fucking meme that 12 year old girls post on facebook as irreversible cultural misandry as opposed to what it is, …
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:24 PM
2

No, I'm marrying a woman who isn't self-absorbed and worked to ascertain whether she was and nurture a healthy communication pattern early on in the relationship. Snark: Oh. I see. You're a bitter retard.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:33 PM
1

What is your point. It's a musical. Who cares.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:12 PM
5

You aren't meeting the right women.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:09 PM
1

"Objectively speaking, the abuse is the same, but women experience it differently. Because of this they suffer more for it and have a harder time escaping it. Therefore we should support women even more even though men and women suffer abuse at the same rates." The difference is, Cortisol is by far the more harmful neurochemical, so there is little to no argument for this on a medical level in terms of bodily harm and stress. I think the two responses make quite a bit of sense from the evolution…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:52 PM
1

I agree, he's pretty outrageous, even if (and I stress)partially correct.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:26 PM
1

Esquire is a far classier mag.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:17 PM
2

Being a caretaker is tough, it can make you depressed and snap. We don't have enough support for things like this in the States.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:29 PM
-4

I thought it was right wing traditionalists.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:41 PM
5

Because feminist discourse, believe it or not, used to be rooted in old school liberalism about ensuring equal opportunities. Have you ever read the Seneca Falls Declaration? It's reads pretty similarly to the Declaration of Independence, and is definitely developed in the vein of thought of enlightenment ideology. Compare that with the 2nd wave feminism and its derivative 3rd wave feminism and it changes from rational airing of grievances to angry, emotional rhetoric. It becomes ok to be ANGRY …
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:24 PM
4

Of course you'd call it "MANners." Why isn't it called "WOMANners" /s
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:48 PM
15

Dude... What?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:40 PM
1

Just sit in your office, the women who come by and enjoy your company will ask why you haven't been talking to them. Tell them someone reported you to H.R. for being too flirtatious and you don't understand why because you are just outgoing. Then, they will go back to the hen-house and try to figure out who reported you to HR. They'll find out by process of elimination or the person will out herself. She will be shunned and or shamed for her behavior. You win.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:02 PM
1

The MRM does seem to attract some pretty vocal conservatives/traditionalists. That is probably why. It's the exact same situation as Feminists getting painted as marxist bull-dykes.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:55 PM
2

I just don't know about pretty.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:49 PM
1

Dude, just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not hilarious. I love that fuckin movie, and it didn't become a cult classic for no reason. The humor is dry and the characters are over the top. It's ten times better than any run of the mill buddy flick. Maybe you should change your name to theGDHipsterBatman
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:47 PM
1

Yeah? Well...
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:14 PM
7

Uhh, go to the public beach?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:25 PM
4

Yeah, that's pretty much fucking retarded. I'm a straight guy, and I love being hit on by the gays. It's a self-esteem boost, no matter where it comes from. Homophobia doesn't come from fear of being oppressed by another person's sexual advances, it derives from a social and moral framework that purports to abhor homosexuality being challenged in a way that the subject is uncomfortable with. It is either folks who are unsure of themselves, or morally group-centric who express homophobia.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:23 PM
8

The voice of reason.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:06 PM
2

adderall.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:51 PM
2

Same. It also sounds way less bitter.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:34 PM
5

This made me laugh.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:25 PM
2

You are corresponding with a professional gym rat. Don't expect well reasoned arguements.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:44 PM
1

She was probably trying to hit on you.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:56 PM
2

It depends. There are certainly people who just miss the fact that there isn't consent, and go on anyway. The "accidental" rapists are just guys that got their signals crossed. But then there are assholes who rape people because they enjoy it. I think the wolf-cryers are in between these two because they are well aware of what they are doing.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:52 PM
1

Not men's rights.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:55 PM
0

ITT: Complaining about evolutionary mechanisms of attraction like something can be done about it.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:05 PM
2

Oh, perhaps I missed it in that horrible british accent.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 05:53 PM
1

the latin word for patriarchy is patriarchus.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:21 PM
-7

This is pretty benign. I'm downvoting, not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:55 PM
1

Yeah, it's important to remember that this sub highlights the worst of the worst. Just like feminist subs convince dumb women that all men are evil, /r/mensrights convinces dumb men that women are evil. The truth is there are bad apples on both sides, and justice has never been and never will be a perfect system. Be smart, but be easy man. It's not worth the mental anguish. I mainly come here for counter talking points to feminist garbage or traditional gender role arguments. I get really fed up…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:00 PM
3

BOY HOWDY, did you just sum up the major issue with this sub.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:04 PM
10

The narrator is kind of a ranting, slobbering, angry idiot. The Al-Jazeera piece was enough to make the point IMO, and homeboy using terms like, "beta male pussies" and "mangina's" in his assessment are just stupid, distract from the issue, and assert a connection between guy's who are "afraid of losing privilege" and MRAs. TLDR: This guy sucks, but the report was good.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:29 PM
-2

Berlusconi is a big fat shit. He sucks in so many ways. He is intimately involved with the mafia, he embezzles from the Italian state, and he steals national elections. Motherfucker SHOULD be in prison. I don't doubt for a second his guilt.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:08 PM
0

"pretty sure there were no women in the judicial system in the late 1800's." There were no women judges/lawyers.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:15 PM
0

What does this have to do with the issue at hand. Absolutely nothing. You can't bring a discussion about property laws into a discussion about male physical expressions of affection in friendship. On a side note: Is this really what the discourse has been reduced to around here? A year ago, this place was fairly rational and logical in the approach to debate. I don't know if it's an influx of children, idiots, or embittered assholes, but for god's sake, let's stop scapegoating and trying to link…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:57 PM
1

Guys get absolutely no choice in who to have sex with, what personality they want to have sex with, and who gets to bear their genes. /s C'mon man, this is exactly what feminists do, play the victim card and absolve themselves of agency in the world. Just because your not playing with a full deck doesn't mean you don't have any cards.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:51 PM
1

Women control sex I just don't buy this. In many cases, women have the upper hand, but saying women control sex is a bit hyperbolic, and still has nothing to do with the issue at hand. men hanging out with men is 'gay'. I don't know a single person who thinks this. Bromance is just a goofy term to say that you really gel with another guy. I think this is all mountains out of molehills and distracting from REAL issues.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:17 PM
17

I don't think this is a feminism thing. This is an issue created and enforced by guys. Let's not scapegoat here. I'm pretty sure there were no women in the judicial system in the late 1800's.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 01:59 PM
1

This thread is rampant with misogyny. Jokes or not, it doesn't reflect well on MR and therefore shouldn't really be posted here. It's bad for perception, and we're already fighting against a negative perception
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:39 PM
9

I agree, let's not be ridiculous people. 27 years is plenty a plenty long sentence.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:24 PM
1

You can make that case about almost every president we've ever had.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:22 PM
1

If it's presented in the same way, sure. In fact, this is actually the reversal of an old hollywood trope where the woman is hysterical and has to be slapped. So it has been done.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:02 PM
0

Geez, it's called slapstick. If it had been two guys, it still would make kids laugh. Just watch Roadrunner. Its the same shit. You're digging too deep.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:58 PM
3

Yeah, I read this and I say, "fucking sweet, I get 17.5% off"
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:18 PM
1

I have to say, I do get a pretty strong cognitive bias. I try to remember that jokes are just that, jokes. Tropes and stereotypes are funny to me when they're about any group. They don't make me think that those groups are all that way. My roommate is pretty openly racist. He says some funny shit. I don't believe it, but it's delivered in a humourous way and is actually an endearing part of his personality. When women are actually funny (a rarity IMHO), they can make some pretty humorous observa…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:16 PM
4

TBH, parts of Africa have a serious rape problem of both men and women.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:55 PM
2

She should have to work in a rape crisis center and see how fucked up that accusation was.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:24 PM
-2

I agree, it's pretty speculative without much data backing it up.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:25 PM
-1

That movie sucks. I felt raped watching it.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:21 PM
9

Tyler the Creator is pretty genious. His lyrics are irreverant but playful, and occasionally penetratingly deep. this is his self-produced video that won him best new artist this is him making fun of rap culture
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:12 PM
3

Yeah, I love lesbians and they generally love me. It's a vocal minority who espouse these views, usually ones who have personal baggage or are absolute failures and need a scapegoat.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:04 PM
2

I have to take breaks from MRM so I can remember that most women are absolutely lovely and I myself live a charmed life. I'm a supporter for the guys that ARE fucked by the system.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:02 PM
1

No mention of Denarys Talgaryan though...
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:56 PM
8

It'll be a doozy :)
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:18 PM
16

I've gotten that way about most submissions to Reddit. I end up just going to the comments and looking for whoever most eloquently debunks the article and read that thread.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:29 PM
7

Would you actually say assaulted, harrassed, or just getting signals mixed for these? Not trying to be pedantic, I'm just trying to drive home the point of the lack of nuance in feminist definitions of sexual assault that you're graciously pointing out.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:50 PM
5

I lol'd.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:48 PM
2

This guy should be in jail for still using myspace XD Edit: Downvote away, I'm just trying to lighten the mood here people. it's always so gloom&doom around here.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:46 PM
26

The golden mean: The truth lies somewhere in the middle. Feminist propaganda has expanded the definition of sexual assault ad absurdum to inflate the numbers, then uses the term "sexual assault" interchangeably with "rape." Some in the MRAs similiarly cherry pick statistics from small, localized studies, examine only reported crimes (of which there are undoubtedly more). Honestly, both statistics, both Paul Elam's 1 in 1,877, and the FBC (feminist battle cry) of 1 in 4 are both decidedly not acc…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:00 PM
2

TL;DR: Be a Jedi Master, not a Sith Lord
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:45 PM
1

God I hope they get pwned once again!
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:13 PM
1

Just so everybody knows, linking to a /r/mensrights could be construed as breaking rule #2 in the TwoX sidebar. I use these rules regularly when I post there to A) Be a good netizen. B) To shame people who break the rules in their discussion with me. Equanimity: No drama-inducing crossposting of content found in other subreddits, or vice versa. Likewise, posts found to direct odious influxes here may be removed. Now, that is a questionable use of the rule if they imposed it in this instance, but…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 04:41 PM
1

Amen to this. Obviously poorly educated people in a stupid argument over 75 cents.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:29 PM
2

It sounds like your doing everything right already. Just bid your time for now until you can afford the lawyer. Make damn sure that it's legal to record when the other party is unaware so that it's admissable in court.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:26 PM
1

Less competition for good jobs = more men with good jobs = proportionally more good men.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:48 PM
3

Wish i could Double upvote this.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:30 PM
0

The difference is you can't legislate thoughts and belief systems fucktard. Attacking systemic injustice is eliminating laws that enforce unjust social mores, beliefs and preconceptions. Eliminating social injustice through the use of legislation A) Doesn't work. B) Is just as bad as the systemic injustice currently enshrined into law, just on the opposite end of the spectrum because it restricts freedom of expression. This will be my last post on this topic unless you can come up with a reasona…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:58 PM
18

"I was surprising my boyfriend for his birthday. His mom let me in to his room before he woke up and I pulled back the sheets really fast to surprise him and wake him up. He had an ERECTION and I saw it through his underwear. I can't help like feeling that this is this rape? Am i right? Should I have him apologize?"
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:24 PM
0

It isn't arbitrary. Systemic injustice is codified into law you fucking idiot. Social injustice is not. You solve social injustice through facilitating a change in culture, not legislation. I invoked segregation because it is a prime example of this exact circumstance. North = De Facto segregation i.e. social injustice South = De Jure segregation i.e. Systemic injustice. Let me know if you need a remedial American civil rights course. I don't often get pissed at the idiots online, but your conde…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:10 PM
1

Injustice doesn't disappear because of 1 instance of somebody bucking the system. Truthfully, injustice never disappears because the world is not a just place and evolving socioeconomic circumstances change culture over time. The reason nobody thought of men's rights as an injustice in the past is because nobody payed attention to injustices leveled at women. Now that women's rights have been achieved in terms of legal equality, the issues plaging(sp?) men are more readily apparent because of th…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 08:54 PM
3

You could argue it violates Title IX statutes.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:07 PM
2

You don't understand, the threat is what carries the weight. Universities don't want a discrimination lawsuit on their hands, no matter what group it's coming from. It's bad for PR and it's bad for the bottom lines.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 04:39 PM
2

I've read of at least 5 or 6 on this sub. The problem is most people don't want to put the effort in, they just want to complain that effort is being made for something else. These women's groups don't appear out of nowhere. Somebody had to convince somebody it needed to exist. I wasn't fully aware of men's issues when I was in school, and now I'm out in the corporate world where there aren't really any competing ideologies that would affect me, we're pretty much just about results. Guys, if you…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:18 PM
13

Try again, then threaten litigation and to the press. It's simple. And for every story of "we were told to fuck off," I'm willing to bet there are a potential of 10 "we were given the money, a space, and support." You don't know if you don't ask. This fatalistic, victim attitude is bullshit. That's for other groups, not for MRM.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:56 PM
1

Not a men's rights issue, but what a bitch.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:42 PM
2

They're brainwashed. children FTFY. I feel like the average age on Tumblr is younger than the average redditor. 16 year olds socio-political opinions are almost always overly generalized, overly simplified, and overly extreme. They have ivory tower opinions, minus the tower (i.e. perspective). Ivory basement is more like it, because when your 16 (unless you live in a warzone, on the street, or some other situation where you're forced to grow up fast), you are basically free from interacting with…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:27 PM
1

Can we stop with the 16 year old girls on tumblr. They are idiots. They are virgins. They have never had jobs. They have upper-middle class priveleged lives and need something to bitch about. They have no real world experience. Their opinions don't count.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:22 PM
11

You know you can go to your campus SGA to request funds to create a group for men, start a men's lounge, and recruit students using flyers created through appropriated student club funds don't you? At Auburn, the SGA rubber stamped EVERYTHING that came through the door. I wish people would stop bitching about what resources are available for women and instead actively lobby for men's resources.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:54 PM
0

Yeah. 59 is basically a potatoe with legs and arms. I agree that she is probably quite easily controlled. Children have higher IQs than this and think how easy it is to brainwash them.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 07:42 PM
-5

This.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 07:37 PM
1

What does GQ have to do with lack of masculinity?
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:10 PM
1

This example is unrelated. The kid was born definitively male. The child from OP is intersex. The two are completely different. It's an apples to oranges situation, and you're simplifying the issue by painting it into a gender binary.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:06 PM
1

This isn't a boy or a girl. The kid is intersexed and he's exploring his identity. I'm not condoning the hospital's actions, it was ridiculous, but he isn't a boy or girl in the biological sense and trying to force the kid into a gender binary like everybody ITT is doing is just as wrong on an intellectual-ethical level as the hospital's actions were immoral on the medical-ethical level. The right to make your own decisions about your body is human rights issue. Bodily autonomy is not a men's ri…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:03 PM
1

Due process is for the criminal element. Education is to prevent people from putting themselves in compromising situations. Teach women how to avoid being targeted. Teach men about the warning signs for women who might target them, the types of risky situations that lead to false accusations/misunderstandings. It's pretty simple. Rape education is about more than just "rape is wrong." It's about managing risky behavior.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:00 PM
5

Due process and education. I blatantly shot him down because it's a stupid idea.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:04 PM
7

This is so stupid. Shut up.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 03:09 PM
1

I'd like to point out this bitch is in a band most people have never heard of. Charles Manson was a musician of mild renown and hated the successful people in the music business the same way.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 03:04 PM
2

Butthurt unsuccessful hipster pseudo-intellectual fem-nazi musician bitches be cray.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 03:02 PM
1

This is the downside of the bro code.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:53 PM
11

I really hate it when people like you try to compare the west to places that are not western in an attempt to validate the "oppression" of western women. It's hyperbolic of gender politics in the west at the very best, and disrespectful of women in cultures that truly do not have equality at worst.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:10 PM
4

Hmm, Germans have the lowest employment rate of european women, yet have the highest GDP?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 07:48 PM
2

Things that challenge me? Nothing, but that doesn't mean there aren't injustices out there. I suppose I can make the argument that my education wasn't as good as it could have been.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 07:08 PM
9

Sort of like Reddit and Tumblr's version of "Feminism" is to 8th grade girls? How many rad-fems do you think are really out there that aren't: A) Angry manhating Ivory tower lesbian academics. B) A fat, single, manhating neckbeards with a vagina (not sure what the equivilent. C) College, high school, or middle school students that have no real world experience. Legitimately, how many? I mean, I know Tumblr and Reddit Feminism is just full of intellectual juggernauts. All those women flexing thos…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 07:05 PM
1

God, if only the discussion in this sub was more like your response... Thanks, that was an insightful comment and a good review of political theory I had forgotten from my college classes.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:48 PM
2

the education system weren't designed to deny as many men as possible the chance for a higher education. That's a bit hyperbolic. I totally agree that boys are being underserved in western educational pedagogies, but it's not because of some feminist conspiracy to harm boys as much as it is a result of an accumulation of unintended consequences. If the education system was designed to deny as many men as possible the chance for higher education, it wouldn't allow any to achieve. Boys underachiev…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:16 PM
2

To be fair, though I normally agree with your posts, that is an apples/oranges comparison as you don't need a college education to be any of those things.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 04:51 PM
5

Actually, if you look at all the posts around here it's: "Give me a fair shake in the family courts." "Give me due process if I'm accused of a crime." "Don't pathologize masculinity."
/r/MensRights07/05/13 04:25 PM
1

"But I can say that salaries and employment conditions are the deciding factors. It's about what we pay for good teachers and preschool teachers," she said. Oh it is? It has nothing to do with being under intense scrutiny just for having a penis and being royally fucked the second someone accuses you of being inappropriate.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 01:51 PM
3

Definitely a thought-provoking editorial, however it was a bit hyperbolic. The problems that it points out are not new to the condition of being male, it is merely that Feminism has highlighted these issues that have always been there through the process of exclusion. I don't think that men are any more mercenary than they have always been. People don't get married in their 20's because they're all focused on starting a good career, which takes longer than it used to because there are fewer jobs…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 01:38 PM
2

Ok, the best part of this post is that armed with evidence, there are reasonable people in the world who will do what's right. The Justice
/r/MensRights07/05/13 01:14 PM
1

Why read it when you can get the cliff's notes and skim through the first two pages, read the "major themes" and draw conclusions from that?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:11 PM
2

Black women speak the truth! That's why I love black women.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:07 PM
0

I think you (and soft psychologists) are conflating sociology with psychology. My father was a auditory perception research psychologist. It was hard science, with stringent experimentation and research methodologies. Psychology is a spectrum bridging the gap between neurology and sociology, and the breadth of the discipline does not mean it's shaky. If anything, Psychology is the hardest of the social sciences because, theoretically, it is the only one that requires any real knowledge or consid…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 03:14 PM
4

Honestly, the woman was certifiably insane. She was on anti-psychotics.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 01:38 PM
2

pedo-hysteria.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 06:13 PM
2

Men won't go because of the stigma. Source: Experience.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter