| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | Most men and women in the UK support circumcision ban - YouGov poll | Intactivism | cassepompon | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 09:46 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | A Doctor’s opinion on infant circumcisionIt can be compared to lower grades of FGM. There are absolutely no benefits of doing it to children, and the benefits to adults are debatable since they are based on very flawed studies. The main reason it’s not acceptable is that it’s pseudomedicine that takes away an individual’s right to informed consent and ability to decide what to do with their own bodies. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/19 05:05 PM |
| 2 | A Doctor’s opinion on infant circumcisionI take it you’re from the Philippines, where circumcision is a remnant of the period that Islam was predominant in that area. The act is often linked with Christianity, despite the fact that Popes and the bible itself says that circumcision is not acceptable for Christians. There is nothing manly about being peer-pressured into getting your genitals cut, quite the opposite in fact. What it does is rob the individual of informed consent, and cause irreversible damage - especially in the Philippin… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/19 05:00 PM |
| 0 | Debate: Hillary just made plain feminist hypocrisy on the "wage gap"Most polls suggested a hung parliament in the 2015 UK election, but the result was a Conservative majority. Most polls discounted Brexit, the polls on the day itself suggested remain would win by 10 points... | /r/MensRights | 27/09/16 12:55 PM |
| 8 | The UN double standard on GMIt really isn't a question about how people prefer their genitals or how functioning they are, what matters is that girls are protected from a similar (most often lesser) surgery yet no consideration is given to boys. It is a blatant inequality: you can cut boys' genitals if you want to, but you can't even perform a ceremonial pin-prick on a girl's. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/15 06:50 PM |
| 5 | Saw these guys at Dragon*ConWell, at least you're consistent in your stupidity. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 05:51 AM |
| 5 | Saw these guys at Dragon*ConI hope there's more of social acceptance of not circumcising by the time I would start having kids (not that that would deter me if I ever did, but it'd be nice). Circumcised infants in the US will probably be in the minority within the first half of this century if the downward trend keeps going. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 05:43 AM |
| 6 | Saw these guys at Dragon*Connon-modernized cocks. Umm, not sure if you know this but only third-world countries practice routine infant circumcision. The majority of the first-world leave their children's genitals alone. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 05:33 AM |
| 11 | While male circumcision is widely accepted, even digitally editing female genitals in porn sparks outrageI'll precise the argument for you: It matters because circumcision is a men's rights issue due to how female genitals are protected but men's aren't. It probably hasn't changed your life in any significant way, but a lot of evidence suggests that being cut doesn't help anyone and can have negative sexual effects. There are also very strong ethical issues concerning an infants freedom of choice. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/15 05:53 AM |
| 7 | While male circumcision is widely accepted, even digitally editing female genitals in porn sparks outrageAs an 18 year old you wouldn't have got it done because you'd know how great having a natural penis is... | /r/MensRights | 03/08/15 05:47 AM |
| 9 | While male circumcision is widely accepted, even digitally editing female genitals in porn sparks outrageBut the skin's the best bit! | /r/MensRights | 03/08/15 05:46 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter