TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cassowaryy Archive

View 0 posts and 322 comments by cassowaryy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Looks ain’t everything and it ain’t just about what you provide (time commitment, money etc). Yea being with the hottest girl ever is ideal from a certain standpoint, but practically speaking there is so much more to it than just that. I think it’s rational to take a balanced approach. If she’s attractive, stable, loyal, and emotionally and physically compatible she’s a better option at an 8 than a 10 would be if she ain’t got those traits. Sure, if you could get a 10/10 with all those traits go…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:22 AM
1

If lesbians had dicks they’d bust nuts in 2 seconds. Lmfao. Quit wit the cappin
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:02 AM
1

You do realize single people still date and hook up right? Slow down with the asexual takes damn lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:01 AM
1

How often are you paying for hookers? Might as well buy a wife from Asia
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 07:30 AM
-1

Absolutely disagree. There is nothing cheaper than a hookers pussy. I’d rather pay for a nice meal, build some romantic tension, then have an awesome evening with a girl who’s enjoying my company and physicality. Getting a prostitute is just about busting a nut. You wanna compare fast food to a home cooked meal? Sure, there’s a time and a place. But “so much better” because it’s fast and easy? Nah. The extra effort that sets you apart from peasants who must pay to merely fuck whores is often wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 07:25 AM
8

“Why are people with social retardation less attractive?” Do you need someone to explain to you why humans eat food next? In what world would a disability make someone more attractive? Maybe you’re slightly autistic
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 06:13 PM
16

It’s about wanting camouflaged privilege rather than true equality nowadays
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:41 PM
3

Well good luck to the fool who takes you that serious
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 01:31 AM
6

You should be banned from ever being able to get married if this is your view. Just stay in casual relationships if you are willing to break things off because you’re “bored.” Divorce has massive consequences, from financial to emotional, that usually disproportionately affect one of the parties. I would never marry a woman who thinks it’s ok to just divorce when nothing is going wrong. You’re unworthy of such serious commitment!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:57 PM
–

Boo hoo, poor illegal criminals and rapists that are being deported. Why should I care about those men? I’m happy they’re facing the consequences they deserve! As for the temporary freeze and programs, it may not have been implemented the best way, but I totally agree with the sentiment behind it: an audit to find wasteful spending. That’s how they found out $50million was about to be spent sending condoms to Gaza lmao. Now the freeze has been rescinded and all those programs will keep functioni…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:40 PM
–

That’s not completely true. I’m happy with most of what he’s doing. And I ain’t hiding no where
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:03 PM
3

It’s not even racism, just different categories within the group. Not all men are identical, especially those coming from foreign lands that could potentially be your enemies. Duh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 10:41 PM
10

As is typical with most modern feminist arguments and positions. They’re illogical and hypocritical, but you’re not allowed to question it. Don’t shame women for being sluts; But you’re an incel and creep if we find you weird. Men should treat women more fairly; but actually men are controlled by an evil force (within them?) called patriarchy which trains all men to be misogynists. Equal representation in school is important; but who cares that men now represent less than 40% of college graduate…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 03:53 PM
13

I read some of it but it drags on too long and is too much about your personal insecurities. This is something better handled by a therapist, genuinely. Most of us are here to debate general dating trends and gender relations, not help someone find the answers to heal their trauma and emotional insecurities. Consent really isn’t that complicated imo, and a lot of your conclusions are the result of your insecurities. You talk about all these cultural narratives and how they’re responsible for you…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 07:07 PM
24

No one cares. You should pay a therapist if you want someone to listen to your rants
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 06:10 PM
1

I’m not gonna say there’s no validity to these conclusions, but half of the arguments it’s using for them are complete bullshit. Men make their partners their whole world and never recover after breakups? Lmao maybe simps yea, but I’ve rarely ever been more attached to a girlfriend than she was to me. Also claiming that men were evolved for one mate and women for multiple partners? It’s like this chatbot is stuck on Opposite Day because that’s the least rational argument I’ve ever heard. Essenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 02:55 PM
6

Men can’t afford to be that delusional. Being sexless as a man doesn’t make you strong and independent, it makes you a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 01:09 AM
0

Lmao no it’s not. Blue pill is the default factory settings before you even heard of any pills.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:11 PM
9

No one in their right mind goes around telling people “I’m red pill” lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:23 AM
4

Most of the stuff you mentioned as blue pill advice is redpill advice. Be fit and make money? Definitely redpill. Blue pill advice for dating is essential just “be yourself” and “respect women”
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 04:43 AM
–

No I'm talking about all the American women who are saying they're gonna start doing that
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:56 AM
–

4B movement just proves how emotional women are. Going celibate because they’re mad their hyper abortion-fixated candidate didn’t win lmao. Not to mention Trump said he doesn’t support a blanket abortion ban and would veto it. Its irrational
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:38 AM
6

They’ve despaired to the point of cutting themselves out of the gene pool. I’d say pretty miserable
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:44 PM
3

Bears are actually related to dogs. Looks like she made her choice!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:43 PM
3

No, it’s incredibly obvious that the main thing a guy would need to protect their girl from is other predatory dudes. Literally a story as old as time itself
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 10:12 AM
2

Yes. I read an article of a man who saw a couple arguing and tried to step In to help the woman. The other guy shot the dude in the head then ran off with the girlfriend he was arguing with. You can look it up, but sacrificing your life for a random woman who won’t even give a fuck about you when you die is worthy of a Darwin Award
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 10:08 AM
1

Yea I read an article about some 90 year old dude having a child not too long ago so it’s clearly NOT the same. And literally everyone has a biological clock, no one’s immortal
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 03:31 PM
102

Yea but almost a compliment to be called a fuckboy. Especially when they keep coming back
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 04:35 AM
17

I’ve always been decently attractive, but my results still significantly improved as I’ve aged and became nonchalant and stopped giving a single shit about things not working out. In fact I’d say the later was far more important for my results
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 08:52 AM
–

You forgot about Scotland. Why do the Scottish wear kilts? Because sheep can hear a zipper from a mile away
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 12:31 AM
6

Seems like you’re not a regular of R/relationshipadvice
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 06:15 AM
1

What’s easier? Fix all of society’s problems so that people who are dead set on not having kids decide it might be worthwhile for them to reproduce, or to ban abortion and shame ideas / policies that encourage population replacement via immigration instead of reproduction? I’m not saying the later is a morally superior strategy, but it’s a lot easier and it’s implementation more straight forward. Access to birth control is one of the main predicators of a society’s population declining. Banning …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 05:28 PM
–

Personally I’ve never cared for it. I’m guessing it’s appealing to some guys cuz it’s usually tighter. It’s really not that deep
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:44 PM
18

Probably not. The differences in our design and role in reproduction have a significant impact on our behaviors. I think the fact that childbirth for women is such a tedious process is exactly why there is less of an urge to reproduce as much as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 07:13 PM
89

Obviously a desirable man with his shit together wouldn’t tolerate an abusive woman. However, many men are desperate for any kind of affection / intimacy. If the closest you’ll ever get to intimacy / reproduction is by staying with an abusive woman, then it’s definitely better than nothing. I guess a part of the difference could be that women generally don’t put such a big importance or emphasis on reproduction, therefore solitude is preferred over mistreatment even at the expense of not having …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:11 PM
14

You’re missing the bigger picture. For thousands of years women have been the target of male sexual intent. Aggressive and unattractive men often do not care about boundaries and may assault or even rape women who refuse. Men can be very dangerous. Men can also be supportive and protective and caring. That’s why women have frequently aligned themselves with desirable male partners, because a male that has a vested interest in a woman will put himself on the line to protect her from attacks and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 12:38 AM
0

This only applies if you’re bad at game and ugly honestly. When you’re game becomes so subtle that you don’t even give a girl the opportunity to “reject you” (because you never made an obvious advance until she was obviously interested first), then real life approach is elite. Honestly it’s a lot easier to build attraction in person than online. Last time I got laid from an in-person approach it all transpired within 3 hours and she was a baddie that wouldn’t have even seen my tinder message had…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 09:12 AM
–

You might wanna take a break from the psychedelics. Not even inter-dimensional beings could comprehend wtf you just said
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 09:06 AM
–

Sex is copulation. Whether the woman, or even the guy finishes, isn’t a requirement. I’ve had sex with women where I didn’t finish, does that mean we never fucked? I agree otherwise, poor performance will reduce the frequency at which you have sex, but not being able to perform has minimal correlation with wanting it or desiring it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 05:56 AM
2

You’re conflating the desire for sex with the desire to satisfy your partner. Those are not the same thing. The male impulse for sex is driven by a desire to inseminate and satisfy feelings of horniness. Spending 20+ minutes on foreplay is only relevant when there’s a desire to satisfy your partner and/or increase the likelihood of seeing them again. That’s more effort, and it’s possible to really care about having sex while not caring about the person you’re having sex with. Obviously guys who …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:37 AM
5

“Men don’t care about sex because they don’t all go out of their way to make sure the woman orgasms.” No, that just means men who are bad at sex don’t care about the pleasure of the woman they’re having sex with. They still definitely care about sex
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:18 PM
3

Most understand that no one owes you sex. If a woman doesn’t want to hook up with you then she isn’t obliged to. That doesn’t mean that the “friendzone” (situation where one party is romantically interested and the other is not) doesn’t exist or that tons of naive guys don’t go out if their way to court and do favors for women who don’t give two fucks about them. The whole point of discussing the “friendzone” is so that simping can be avoided so you don’t become “that guy.” Only losers blame wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 04:21 PM
1

Good point I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 06:04 AM
8

I agree with some of your points but others miss the mark. The idea that we’re gonna send all men to training camps to “fully understand” consent when it’s so nuanced is utterly absurd and nigh impossible. It almost sounds like you’re trying to create a justification for men to be held accountable for SA crimes when a woman didn’t even tell him no, but just displayed “token resistance” or some even more subtle way of communicating “no.” The whole concept is regressive, impractical, and borders o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 06:00 AM
0

I agree with some of your points but several others seem to be denial. I’ve been on plenty of dates with women who said “we’re not having sex tonight” to which I of course say “yea no problem” and then a few hours later they’re the ones escalating to sexual activity. You can label it as token resistance or a change of heart or whatever you want, but the fact remains that there are many scenarios where a woman will say no to sex but not want you to just get up and leave and completely stop pursui…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 05:44 AM
13

No woman is worth more than your own life unless she’s brought your children into this world
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 05:56 AM
–

Okay well we can agree that letting hundreds of criminals go free out of fear of locking up one innocent person is an absolutely terrible way to run a justice system. I don’t think Benjamin franklins opinion reflects the exact state of affairs though
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 10:46 PM
–

So you intentionally misquoted the “10” and multiplied it by another 10 to get 100 criminals for every innocent. I’m not saying criminals don’t go free or that lawmakers didn’t prioritize innocents, but exaggerating the rate and difficulty of prosecuting criminals doesn’t prove that the judicial system encourages the protection of criminals and abusers. Not to mention it’s the left that wants to be more lax on criminals if anything, I wonder how you justify that paradox.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 10:13 PM
–

That’s absolutely false. Plenty of people get convicted when they’re shown to have perpetrated a crime. Why shouldn’t there be a burden of proof on the accuser if they’re trying to lock someone up? So you believe guilty until proven innocent is a better way to go about things? And then feminists are confused when people say they’re agenda is dangerous
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 08:19 PM
10

They did an experiment with apes where they gave them money and created a market where they could buy food and trinkets with it. The apes eventually started trading money amongst themselves for different things. Guess what the first thing they paid for was? Prostitution
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:54 PM
1

You could argue they’re reasonable requirements but most men would argue they are extra expectations and responsibilities that come with less of a return. Why should I be paying for a babysitter for some child that’s not mine just to MEET a woman I might be interested in dating? There are plenty of childless women who come with less baggage and expectations that I’d much prefer to give my time and effort to. Not to mention they don’t come with a random child I’ll need to support. If anything sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:32 PM
1

The problem is that this list of “negative effects” is a completely subjective exposé coming from a feminist perspective. Half of the list seems like pessimistic feminist attitudes towards traditional relationships. “Increasing approval of restrictions on their behavior during courtship” meaning they’re happily agreeing to limit themselves by not going on dates or being flirty with other guys or posting thirst traps, and that’s a negative effect… “increased seeking dependency-oriented help from …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:44 AM
1

At that point you’re kind of justifying sexism though. To say that it is sexist to treat a woman differently than men under any circumstance is to say that sexism is necessary on occasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:22 AM
1

Technically men are more disposable in terms of having a reproductively successful society. Few men + lots of women = peaceful society with lots of babies. Lots of men + few women = violent society with a shrinking population.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:12 AM
1

Yea but 92% of the time it’s the guys who are stronger and lifting the heavy stuff, like in all these testimonies plus I’ll add mine. If people are playing to their capabilities that are typically associated with gender isn’t that benevolent sexism no matter what?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:06 AM
2

That’s kind of the problem with the modern feminist perspective tho - unless things are pure equality it must be some form of sexism. “Benevolent sexism” is a descriptive term but with negative connotations. There’s nothing inherently sexist about having a relationship with a more traditional dynamic. Most women even want a guy that acts in a more traditional way, whereas any expectation a man may have of such a thing must be “bad” and “patriarchy.”
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:00 AM
3

Not everything is about a power trip or who is better than who. Who even thinks about relationships in those terms? So you’re just describing abusive relationships..? or maybe you’re projecting because power dynamics really matter to you. Gender roles can be different (and often times are), that doesn’t mean it’s a bad thing… unless your feminist religion forbids you from agreeing. Thinking every relationship must be “50/50” (whatever that means) or it’s some kind of toxic patriarchal power trip…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 03:05 AM
1

That’s such a black and white interpretation. There are so many reasons to prefer a lowkey humble woman over one who’s popping on socials and who thinks her life and opinions are “more important than yours.” I think it’s pretty obvious why it would be a bad idea to commit to someone with that kind of mindset, and it has nothing to do with maintaining some kind of theoretical “king” status.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:36 PM
3

In that scenario I’m not even trying to be her friend though, so I couldn’t care less about hypothetically being a “bad friend” to her. If a man treats every woman that way I’d say it’s pretty misogynistic, but not entertaining a friendship with someone you otherwise only wanted to get freaky with is not morally wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 03:34 PM
3

The problem is that you’re assuming a scenario where this applies to long term friends that suddenly get abandoned because they won’t spread their legs... It’s quite absurd and no one would deny that it’s messed up. But in reality the term “friend zone” applies to a much larger range of scenarios, and it’s mostly for when it’s a new girl you recently started talking to and it’s become apparent she doesn’t want to give anything more than friendship, hence “friend-zoned”. From the very beginning t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 01:56 PM
0

I never said I don’t care about body count. Obviously it makes a difference if a girl has 2 bodies vs 100. What I don’t agree with is your theory that romantic feelings are pure cope to deal with the “unbearable reality” of knowing that your girl might have been touched before. You need to be very insecure to let the thought of a few past relationships destroy your mental. Even when the bodycount is high enough to be an issue, it’s not because I am so jealous of her ex boyfriends that I can’t ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 12:32 PM
1

Because it’s a turn off in of itself. What is there to glean from stories of how different men fucked your girl? Most are stories of how bad it was anyway, and if she’s into something she can tell me that directly. Sometimes the bad stories can be funny but in general I find it disrespectful to your partner to reminisce about pleasureful experiences with others anyway. Stories of how she got sexual with other dudes is not something I ever really bother about
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 05:10 AM
0

I couldn’t care less about the specific details of my gf’s sexual past experiences or past partners. Just don’t talk about it cuz I’m not interested and rather not hear about it. The reason why I’m with her is not because she’s a virgin, but because she’s dependable and not a “hoe” (obviously so many other reasons that are equally important like super sweet, caring, creative, beautiful, interesting with a great personality and analytical mind etc, but that’s not the point of this topic). Obvious…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 02:06 AM
3

In my experience I’d say this is not true. In my experience, women are more emotionally invested in the relationship than I usually am (saying “I love you” more, wanting my company all the time, helping with chores and errands and a way to show care etc.), whereas I’m more physically invested (paying bills or dinner when we go out, helping her with physical tasks she’d rather not do, help here get around etc.). Just because the way they show care and affection is different doesn’t mean it does n…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 06:57 PM
8

Tell me you’re single without telling me
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:32 PM
0

I wouldn’t say it necessarily works for most people but it definitely works in the advantage of women. And why would they give up the advantage? Mating strategies are inherently selfish and studies show that male and female strategies are often on opposing ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:08 PM
1

There will always be people in any niche that take their views to crazy extremes. However that doesn’t negate that lots of RP stuff is just blatantly true, as you even suggested in the first few sentences. Why focus on a few wild claims from red/blackpillers and ignore the fact that the blue pill worldview has mostly collapsed? We all know the Disney fairytales are the furthest thing from reality when it comes to romance and attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:06 PM
2

Never admitting to fault, like ever. I was seriously dating this girl at one point who could never let go of an argument until she drove the point that I was completely in the wrong and she was right. Even in scenarios where she’d start a fight over the pettiest things, she had to make sure I apologized to her. At one point in a petty argument that she started over nothing, I even asked her if she’s ever been wrong and she said “No, I’ve never been wrong in our arguments once. You’re always the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 05:41 PM
3

I actually misread and thought you said women were more capable in every scenario. In terms of your personal experience with coworkers I have no opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:51 AM
9

No one tries hard to look good purely for themselves, unless you’re some kind of narcissistic autosexual. You can’t even see yourself without a mirror and if you lived in a world with no other people, looking pretty would be irrelevant. You do it to improve perception of yourself, which in turn benefits you. “Looking good” only works if others agree, so even when you are doing it “for yourself” it’s because improving how you’re perceived (by others) feels good and has its advantages. So it’s cle…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:38 AM
4

I smell lies
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 07:56 AM
–

By your exact logic, any woman who’s in a monogamous relationship should never work at hooters or any place where they put on revealing outfits. If it’s not ethical for a man to go to hooters, it’s far less ethical for any woman to work there. However, I doubt you agree with that sentiment or are even aware of your own hypocrisy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:22 PM
1

Of course when you put make up on it’s not always done with the specific intention to look good for men, but that’s still its general purpose - to make you more attractive in society. Even when you are “doing it for yourself” you do it because you (sub)consciously know that you’re more socially accepted as attractive with make up and a nice outfit on. You don’t just do it for no reason or because you don’t care about looking good. So yes, women don’t always dress specifically for men, but they v…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:53 AM
2

I can get behind 1st and 2nd wave feminism but a lot of the modern stuff is misguided. And egalitarianism is literally not the same thing as feminism. You don’t know what you’re even saying
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 07:53 PM
2

Just because I believe women should have equal legal rights and equal access to opportunity does not mean I believe that relationships or every aspect of society should be egalitarian. Feminism goes far beyond legal aspects too, and delves into pseudo-psychology and theories of patriarchy, so your assumption that I preach that stuff is blatantly false. What are you even trying to prove? That you have to despise women’s rights to be a true alpha?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 07:41 PM
1

And how do you afford anything? Claiming it’s easy is ridiculous, unless you’re fine being a hobo or have a trust fund. Have you seen how unaffordable everything is these days? If you make a lot of money for little work that’s great, but it’s definitely not feasible for most people. If you’re not making much money and just waiting until your girl starts making it then you’re better off rethinking things for both of y’all’s sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 07:34 PM
1

True but I don’t think pandering to feminism is a requirement, as long as you genuinely believe and support women’s rights. My girlfriend seems fairly feminist and I told her early on I don’t subscribe to its modern ideas, even tho I am fairly egalitarian. We had a dispute but a year later we’re going better than ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 07:00 AM
-1

Well if you’re single with no goals of a family and aren’t working, what are you even doing? Living with your parents?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 06:34 AM
-6

If that’s all feminism was about, focusing on women’s rights, and not about starting grand conspiracies that make man the antagonist of society and encourage gender conflict, it would be great. Most of its focus seems to be on the later unfortunately
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 06:20 AM
0

I wouldn’t say modern feminism is some kind of grand shit test, but I will say that when I’m upfront about being more traditional and treat women in a way that opposes feminist ideals (50/50) they love it. I can see how it might feel like one, but I genuinely think they just believe they’re fighting for a just cause (in theory it is, but in reality it’s just spreading negativity with no concrete objective). My gf totally toned down the feminism talks after being together for a few months and rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 06:04 AM
2

Stoicism isn’t about never expressing emotions. It’s about not letting your emotions, primarily the negative ones, consume you. Also what does sports or military have to do with expressing emotion? Lmao it’s about athleticism and obeying orders. You have no clue what you Are talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 10:12 PM
1

That’s a totally fair point, I just thought we were just talking about society at large. It matters to a decent amount of people it seems
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 10:10 PM
2

What are you talking about? It’s literally proven that people who maintain control of their nerves in tense situations are likely to come out with better outcomes. And stoicism is a concept that’s been around since Ancient Greece, you are dumb as hell if you think this is merely a marketing gimmick by a modern writer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 10:07 PM
1

You are detached from reality if you think status is meaningless. How many doctors or lawyers will date someone in poverty? How do you explain people with higher income having higher marriage rates? How do you explain famous people dating lots of young models or artists filling tour buses with groupies? How do hot girls and famous people get into the VIP section for free? Do you think a broke man living in his mom’s basement will be as successful at relationships as a man with a profitable busin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 09:57 PM
1

I think status matters much more for initial impression and draw. Money matter much more after that point when a longer term relationship is established. I am not famous but have worked hard in life to a point where I have security. I can’t pull every girl but as soon as we’re close and she feels the security and pleasures the lifestyle provides, she’s usually all-in. If you’re famous but can’t even afford your rent no woman is gonna stick with you
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 09:38 PM
3

It’s actually so funny how feminists say patriarchy is toxic and forces men to suppress emotions, but then as soon as men explain their side or share their feelings they’re instantly shamed. That’s why stoicism is so powerful, because everyone else lies and being overly emotional as a man doesn’t help you in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 09:28 PM
-1

Anyone claiming that is delusional. Very few men pay for 100% of the bills and should do their fair share of the housework. However my personal experience is the opposite. Many feminists I’ve dated complain about how unequal and unfairly women are treated all the time yet expect me to pay for dates, buy them gifts and clothing and thoughtful presents, give them lots of affection and princess treatment lol. I’m not mad about it because I know everyone likes those things, but it’s kind of ironic w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 09:18 PM
2

I doubt most men only want women for sex and chores, sounds like you’re describing incel-types. But I can agree that a lot of men have those included in their expectations for a good relationship. I don’t think help with some of the house errands and sex together is a mind blowing expectation to have from your partner, it’s basic adult responsibility and sexual compatibility. There’s a difference between having that as a basic expectation and solely pursuing a woman to have a “bangmaid.”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 09:03 PM
–

Let me make this blunt and easy for you. Answer: because no one wants to settle for the mid 30 y/o woman whose looks are rapidly fading, whose eggs are mostly dried up, and whose only now deciding to find something serious because her time clock is running out. Oh and she’s far more likely to have bunch of baggage and trauma now... Not to mention she’s the opposite of wholesome or “hard to get”, in fact she’s a hoe that’s been jumping on tons of dick before she realized she wants some long term …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 02:07 PM
–

That’s why game is a thing. You can be attractive and have money but if you’re inept at approaching women and not stimulating her emotionally when you’re interacting then it doesn’t really matter. She ain’t going nowhere with you. The looks and money can help gain her attention but doesn’t seal the deal until the energy matches. You can’t skip out on the spark just because on paper you should “have it all”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 06:41 AM
–

Yea it’s a turn off when they’re super progressive. My gf is quite liberal and we’ve gotten into some disagreements over that stuff but recently she’s been a lot more moderate due to our conversations and realizing that some of that woke stuff is just way too extreme. She’s also given me some fresh perspectives on things I hadn’t considered before. I think at the end of the day it matters how open minded people are. People who lack self awareness or a willingness to change are unattractive anywa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 05:19 PM
–

Nah moderates are a green flag
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 04:26 PM
–

There’s no proof she cheated. It’s all just speculation based on the fact she hung out with jiujitsu guy a few times before their divorce, but he was a long term friend anyway. Whether she did or didn’t, it still rings true that looks aren’t everything
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:56 PM
3

And what’s your proof or reasoning for why it’s false? Sure it’s a debated theory but it’s still generally accepted that the gender with higher parental investment in childbirth and raising is generally more selective. Same applies to species where males invest more in childrearing, they tend to be more selective than the females. There’s plenty of studies and real life indicators to imply there’s substance to that idea. No one is “misusing” biology, you just don’t have an argument and are sayin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:18 PM
2

It’s not baloney it’s based in evolutionary biology lmao. Read up on sexual selection or Bateman’s principle or look at all the random girls that get thousands of likes just for posting selfies. Sure there will always be variance and scenarios where it does not apply, but generally men do have more pressure to compete for a mate than women have. And it goes without saying that attractive people of any gender will get a lot of attention. Some people take their views to extremes as a way to cope w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 06:06 PM
2

What’s wrong with having a fetish? Plenty of women have them too
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 03:50 PM
4

“Men keep pestering us for PIV” lmao sounds like sex is such a burden At least everyone’s privates are getting stimulated in that scenario. I could say women pester us for long foreplay sessions where only one person gets satisfied and the other one gets a sore hand / neck.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 10:26 AM
3

Every pro comes with some cons. Just because there are some unpleasant aspects to an advantage doesn’t mean it’s not an advantage at all
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:57 PM
1

Maybe it’s just my experience, but a majority of women are still wayyy more inclined to push for a relationship after a few times rather than continuously have casual sex, unless it’s a one night stand. Sure sex is easy but getting into a relationship is almost just as easy and they usually goes hand in hand if the sex is good
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:56 PM
1

Yea but how complicated and expensive is that? How on earth do you encourage a whole society to find a decent partner, value family and raise children? How do you prevent breakups and abuse and cheating and hedonism and child-free mentalities and low income and anything else that is responsible for people having less children? Not to mention funding and managing that kind of project. Hungary tried that and offered tons of money and benefits for having 3+ kids and they still can’t turn their birt…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 03:29 AM
0

“Having kids not contributing to society” lmao what kind of poor argument is that? At least they will have a society because if you’re not having kids then your society is dying
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 03:26 AM
1

This exactly. Virgin is just the ultimate guarantee but no reasonable guy is trying to only seek out a virgin as a wife… it’s not only upside in that situation either. But the real issue is making sure you ain’t marry no h*e
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:31 PM
1

It depends on how/when you made your money, and how you meet your partner. Lots of rich people came up together in developing businesses and got married due to familiarity. Same for rich people gathering and partying together. They have money independently and meet in person. Since in those cases they both have money they’re more like a 50/50 scenario but it’s not like anyone’s making a spreadsheet and going through the list you made. I’d imagine men who made it later in life and got rich on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 07:41 AM
1

Yep totally agree
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 08:44 PM
1

Most women really like monogamy so that’s debatable
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 11:14 AM
4

You’re right about what you say but you can’t deny that experience also helps you. With time and experience you usually get better at dating and sex, and if you lack it then I could see that affecting your dating results. A part of what makes you attractive to women is having experience and not being clueless
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 11:07 AM
1

Women are better socially than the average man. But a man who’s overcome the hurdles and built himself into being someone who’s social and attractive to women is generally far more socially savvy then the average woman. It’s really just a matter of who you’re comparing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 02:15 AM
-1

I can promise you that any woman like that is not even worth a bother, even if she were attractive (unlikely). Most women with sense realize they don’t want to date a progressive liberal man. The amount of complaints I’ve seen recently on r/relationshipadvice from women about men wanting to do 50/50 in their relationship is not even surprising. One of them said her bf wanted flowers from time to time if he’s expected to buy them for her and she was completely aghast 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:12 AM
–

You’re right on the money. I just wanted to add that the question of paternity is another reason why men generally avoid committing to promiscuous women. Especially back in the day before DNA tests, if a women was known to sleep around then you could not trust that your child with her was actually yours. It’s significantly less worthwhile to commit time and resources to a relationship where paternity is far from guaranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:31 AM
2

I’m multicultural and I can tell you these behaviors transcend culture
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:57 AM
1

Since redpill has become mainstream so many people have crowded the space with their opinions. It’s become too diluted to be considered a cohesive belief system and much of the stuff that is spewed is blatantly false. I will say that the original principles tend to be accurate tho I.e. status is incredibly important to attracting women and you don’t gain it just by “being yourself” and accepting your current behaviors that contributed to your lack of success
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:10 PM
1

I got the best relationship of my life after I was red-pilled. Still happily with the same girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:07 PM
1

Relationships shouldn’t be adversarial but the biological imperatives of males and females are generally conflicting, which is why gender-conflicts and subs like this even exist. If you don’t believe me then read up on some evolutionary biology. I’d recommend “promiscuity” by Tim burkhead.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:06 PM
1

You’re the one that’s contradictory. Your anecdote literally contradicts your own post. You failed to display traditional masculine values because when she seemed iffy about the days you suggested you straight up just told her to figure it out herself… What kind of “assertiveness” is that?? She even said “figure it out you’re the man” before that, basically proving she values traditional masculinity…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:46 AM
–

Yea out of a tiny sample size of 233 married people (many of whom that specific finding probably didn’t even apply to), which totally proves that having many short term flings is a great foundation to build your marriage upon… Not to mention there are many other far more sophisticated and researched studies with much higher sample sizes that completely go against that questionable conclusion. https://archive.ph/j4sWD https://www.athensjournals.gr/social/2017-4-4-3-Pinto.pdf Your cited study just…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:38 AM
–

Depends on context. If she’s a good woman and has had a normal dating life it’s fine, I get it. Most people have hooked up a few times and it’s totally normal. On the other hand, if she’s so extremely “sexually liberated” and “independent” that she has a long string of failed relationships and countless hook ups with random dudes then it’s a clear and easy no. Most of the time she’ll be showing trace habits of that “past” lifestyle too, so it’s not something that’s easy to keep secret. Personall…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:24 AM
2

That’s wild but also very interesting to hear. It’s surprising how some parts of the world can be so different when the local standards are. Definitely puts things into perspective. Thanks for your testimony
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:01 AM
3

Yea and if that woman offered her pussy to another man for money it would become worthless to me. The fact that she’s not selling herself makes her more valuable honestly. But to your point, girls get a lot out of relationships. For one, they love having someone to talk to nonstop and share their feelings and they love having partners and doing cute relationship shit. I genuinely don’t care as much about some of that stuff but do it all anyway because I love and care about my partner, and I don …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:12 PM
–

Because female attraction works differently than for men. Rarely will a woman just see a guy and instantly be ready to fuck him. No, women generally need to be seduced which involves flirting, creating comfort, good vibes etc. You can’t just take the short cut. And it’s really not that hard to tell when a woman is interested in you once you get good at seduction…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 04:13 PM
0

That exactly proves why men don’t beautify themselves… because the highly valued males are valued for things that are not related to appearance. Usually a male is highly valued when he can provide a lot in terms of lifestyle, security, community, and experiences… Being “pretty” alone doesn’t mean much and is a insignificant aspect of masculinity. Of course this ties into the red pill idea that men and women are attracted to differing traits and roles in each other, so if your claim is that the g…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 06:11 AM
3

Kind of a pointless poll. If you look at the total history of feminism then sure, it’s done a lot of good. But the past 2 decades have proven that modern feminism is just a bunch of victim-signaling and a push for privilege instead of equality, all the while falsely claiming women are abused and hated by society at large… The poll should specify what period of feminism they’re addressing in order to be more accurate
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 08:42 PM
0

Not in my experience. I personally only go for women I find attractive, but to be fair I actually have some success with that. Maybe men who have zero game only shoot for the ugliest but I can’t relate to that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 04:23 AM
–

The only way women are “winning” the culture war is by playing the victim card too often and converting universities into woke hellscapes due to their majority representation. To address your points: artificial wombs will help both genders. Sure women can have kids without dealing with pregnancy, but men can also have kids without commitment or restriction to one individual. In fact it may be advantageous for men as they could be creating multiple children a day while women would be capped at on…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 06:37 PM
12

How are you even blue pill if you believe this? The idea that genuine male / female platonic friendships are very rare is basically as redpill as it gets
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 06:09 AM
2

Being “girlfriend zoned” and “sex zoned” is the same thing. Either a guy wants to commit to you long term or not. Being girlfriend zoned just means the guy likes you enough to get in a relationship because he wants consistent sex with you, but at least then it comes with other benefits for the girl as well. It’s definitely an upgrade from just being a c*m bucket
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:03 AM
0

Mine varies widely because I do freelance work on top of my regular mid-paying job. In this economy I definitely don’t make enough to be covering all the bills for two or more people. But I’m still redpill. Redpill isn’t just about being a provider and paying all the bills while your wife stays home and raises kids. For me redpill is more about how to balance the relationship within my means. Sure I might not be rich and pay for everything, but I’ll still do my best to provide, guarantee safety,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 02:13 PM
1

Well then what is? Some people would consider that flirty behavior. My ex did at least
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:52 PM
2

The thing about flirting is that it can be very very subtle, that’s why I think it’s a bit of a stretch to hold it to the same standard as having sex with someone else by call it “cheating.” For example, just being nice to a stranger can be considered flirting. My ex literally told me I shouldn’t be so nice to random strangers because theyll interpret that as flirting. And to be fair some women do get physical and flirty with you just for being polite and listening to them and cracking some joke…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:30 PM
0

No one said she has to stay home all the time or have no job or ambitions… nor do I believe every man should strive for the classic “provider model” especially since most can’t afford it. I do think it’s good for a man to have the mindset of wanting to provide for his wife, even if that doesn’t mean covering 100% of the finances. Being a provider is not only about money… you could provide protection, sentimental gifts or experiences, handy work etc. It’s pretty clear to me that nuance is lost on…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:46 PM
1

Yea I agree with you, most people can’t afford the provider model. I do think that option was slightly more available in the past in terms of overall proportion, but for most people nowadays it isn’t an option. However, none of that means it’s a bad model if you could afford it, or that implementing some aspects of it will be detrimental. In fact I think even if you can’t provide 100% financially to your family while your wife raises the kids, you should still have the mindset of being a provide…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:35 PM
6

It’s funny that you trash talk the “provider model” that’s been functioning for centuries, yet seem to be oblivious to the fact that having two parents that dedicate 50+ hours a week to their careers means they don’t have time for children at all. Personally I would not consider sending your kids to daycare and barely being involved in their lives “good parenting,” but it seems to me that you aren’t really looking for that anyway. Seems to me you’re looking more for a career-focused partner who …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 11:49 PM
13

It’s not unfortunate. A woman’s career success has little to do with how good of a wife or mother she’ll be. Those things are definitely bonuses but to put them at the highest rung of determining a woman’s marital worthiness is the only thing that’s unfortunate in your case
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 05:58 PM
2

It’s 1000% true and anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. Most guys will evaluate the current girl they’re seeing and determine if she’s wifey material or just good for hooking up. I’m sure many girls do it too. I don’t think it has too much to do with looks and more to do with behavior. She could be hot but humble and that could be wifey. Or if it’s well known that she sleeps around a lot then she automatically goes into the hookup or temporary girlfriend category. This probably doesn’t appl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 05:55 PM
2

They have to be because they can’t get away with brat behavior anymore. If they were bratty, self-centered, and rude in their late 30s then no one would pay them any mind. When you’re getting less constant validation and admiration it can humble a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 03:19 PM
1

Your premise is entirely wrong. Being submissive doesn’t “only” increase chances of attracting an abusive man lol. You’re not supposed to submit to someone like that in the first place. Being submissive to a good man who cares about you and takes care of you just strengthens the relationship long term. There’s nothing worse than a nagging woman who constantly rebels against your wishes just to prove her independence. Divorce is imminent in such scenarios. If she were a little more agreeable then…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 07:02 PM
2

Great for casual sex. Highly undesirable for anything long term
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 09:58 PM
2

Well that’s just horrendous and those men are utter trash. Generally I see feminists dissing on women who want to be SAHM by calling them “pick me’s” but I really don’t see anything wrong with either that or choosing to work. The only thing is that it’s a tall ask to expect the roles to flip so that men are the primary caregivers. Honestly many male species just inseminate and leave - it’s much easier, increases likelihood of more offspring for us, and doesn’t come with conditions. Now ideally a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 04:03 PM
1

Goodluck never finding that. You should just go lesbian if you want to achieve that dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:25 PM
2

Women chose to join the workforce. Technically this is all their own fault. No one forced them to work, but now that they do you can’t just expect men to become the primary nurturers now. Sorry Sally, but you asked for this overtime!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 03:23 PM
6

Women choose who gets sex. Men choose who they commit to. Just as you see no issue with a woman choosing not to mate with certain men, I see no issue with an attractive man not committing to a monogamous relationship and having multiple wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 09:04 PM
–

OPs argument was that redpill is wrong for stating age is a significant factor that men consider when looking for long term commitment. She stated a women’s attractiveness is / should be inherent. She then stated that if it were the case that age matters THEN a woman should cheat on a partner when she passes her prime because she is less desirable in the dating market. I was countering both positions by stating that considering a prospective partners age while dating is fairly reasonable, and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 09:04 PM
–

Fair enough. I could be more gentle in my delivery and believe I would be were we to debate in person. Scrolling through dozens of intense debate comments per day that often involve disparaging remarks tends to make one more callous
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 04:53 PM
1

Nowadays women are completely a part of the problem with their entitled feminist delusions going too far. But men are also a huge problem too. Incels, creeps, violent… it’s really two sided matter with both having points and both being in the wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 10:59 PM
3

Assuming her husband is a decent guy, she loses everything because shes guaranteed divorce now and is back on the dating scene at 45 which is a disaster. All because she let some petty insecurities get to her. Just because you age and may not be as physically attractive as you once were doesn’t mean you lost all your value tf? I swear, sometimes it seems like the women on this sub need to exist as eternally desirable sex goddesses or the whole world must burn because someone dared to think that …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:56 PM
1

I’m sorry but nature dictates that most men find women in their 20s more desirable than when they’re in their 50s. It has nothing to do with red pill ideology, but with the fact that “younger women” (full grown adults btw) who are in their 20s are more fertile, generally healthier, and have more life to live. Its nature, its biology, It’s pure common sense… I would hardly consider that red pill but clearly it’s a hard-to-swallow truth that triggers people like you so it fits the bill. Another th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:41 PM
1

Who says she’s not relationship material anymore? You don’t think her personality, or history of loyalty and supportiveness matters to any partner? Just because she may be seen as less desirable in the overall dating scene compared to when she was in her prime doesn’t mean she’s devoid of any value… Nothing you’re proposing makes an ounce of sense. You just sound sexist and triggered
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:55 PM
4

Respectfully, this post is devoid of any real logic. First of all, if she’s so undesirable by 25, how does she even cheat in the first place? Secondly, no reasonable individual, red-pilled or not, thinks women hit the wall at 25. You’re just taking the most extreme versions of certain arguments and making outlandish claims about how to respond to them. Do you genuinely think anything productive will come out of that or does it just make you feel better about your perspective compared to “those o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 10:28 AM
5

No, she has lost her value to most men. Not to the man who has build his life with her and knows her personality deeper than anyone else. That’s actual redpill. That’s the whole point of being a good woman / supportive partner. Only a hoe is valued purely for her looks. And by OPs logic, cheating now just lost you your legitimate partner who cared about you beyond appearance and you are more likely than ever to endure long term loneliness… ironically proving the point of random men who triggered…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 10:12 AM
1

You are right to some extent. A lot of the men who complain about hookup culture do so because they are left out and wouldn’t have a problem with it if they could. At the same time there are plenty of men that want a serious relationship and don’t want to to commit to girl who hooked up with dozens of random dudes, and may have such tendencies in the future. This alone shows that men don’t only dislike hookup culture because a lack of participation. In many cases it has to do with their morality…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 05:16 PM
2

Hard to change the mind of a black piller. This is so obviously pessimistic and overly extreme. We can talk about the disparity about attention towards male issues in public discourse or the fact that women are attracted to different things in the opposite sex, such as an ability to provide security or whatever… but to say men are never loved? You’re so delusional there ain’t even a point to try and convince you otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 09:23 AM
2

What even is your definition of love? Poems about a man’s love for a woman have existed for Millenia. If anything love is less existent nowadays than ever in the past
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 03:04 AM
4

Yea of course that will be the narrative. Society, especially psychological institutions, always portray the man as the problem in these kinds of situations. I’m not saying it’s impossible that men that make less get insecure and ruin their own marriage, but to imply that’s the case a majority of the time is utter delusion. A dude I know lost his high paying job and couldn’t find a good replacement so he got a poorly paying job. Less than a year later his wife had an affair and divorced him. I’m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 07:35 PM
–

You’re the exact kind of woman I would never give a single fuck about wasting my time or attention on. Entitled, mid thirties, over men… Then there are women like my gf who have a more positive outlook on life, want a partner, and are younger, yet still attaining education. It sounds like you’re just trying to justify the fact that you failed at relationships and will stay forever alone
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 04:52 PM
1

Most men have no interest in putting a bunch of effort to get to know a random woman for the sake of it, same as they wouldn’t for a guy. But these same guys maybe interested in these women romantically, and therefore do try to make something happen. But when they don’t get that reciprocated they stop trying. As a result lots of women assume they are just sexual objects to these men, when in reality, they were pursuing with romantic intentions to begin with, so why should they keep interacting w…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:27 PM
–

Very few
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 03:51 AM
5

It wasn’t a narrative being pushed lmao. It was reality. It wasn’t a niche they carved for themselves, it’s just how society evolved from them being the hunters to being the workers. Nowadays it’s different but women still usually seek men who can fulfill that role to some extent
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 08:27 PM
1

You shouldn’t bring dates around your kids unless they’ve been vetted properly
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 08:20 PM
0

People can lose attraction to each other. Why else would a marriage turn into a dead bedroom?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:15 AM
1

Ever heard of co-parenting? It exists. No reason to stay with a woman who isn’t even attracted to you. NEXT
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:39 PM
0

No one is talking about friendships. OP is talking about simps or “nice guys.” Men who do a bunch of shit for women with the hope that they’ll get laid. They definitely exist. You completely missed the point and your little personal story is completely irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:11 PM
1

Like what pressure? To shave their armpits and look pretty? Yea sure there are some societal pressures placed on women but men also are expected to perform, be competent, be funny, stoic, and make money. We all have our struggles and expectations placed on us by society, but I don’t buy the argument that women have it so much harder or that most of men’s problems are created in their own minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 08:10 PM
4

Everyone feels pressure to perform and be the best, it’s not just women. The problem is that there’s a massive culture narrative that women shouldn’t have to do shit and they are perfect as they are. There’s a difference between loving yourself and being proud of who you are while also striving to improve, versus thinking you’re perfect as is and can’t do no wrong. One is confidence the other is narcissism. The later extreme is the one that people run with
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 06:20 PM
5

Exactly. Female and feminist empowerment is all about the delusion of perfection and that you have no faults and shouldn’t do anything to improve. Everything is the patriarchy’s fault lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 06:16 PM
7

You sound completely clueless. Open relationships are not the solution to anything. Most women prefer monogamy and most men wouldn’t want to share their woman (for evolutionarily wired child-rearing reasons). Gay men have neither of those concerns so ofc most of them are in open situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 06:11 PM
1

Feminism actually helps when it comes to casual dating. It’s fairly easy to fuck a feminist tbh. The problem is that It’s hard to commit to one. Most of them aren’t even close to worth it. If you can find a traditional girl who doesn’t think men are evil or the root of all of society’s problems, it’s significantly more likely you found yourself a keeper
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 03:55 PM
9

Why would you even want to cuff someone like that? Being able to fuck without commitment is a win/win. Keep her around while you look for wifey, who will definitely not have the same qualities as this girl. She sounds like she doesn’t even deserve commitment
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 03:42 PM
9

That’s like asking a theater audience how to make a great movie that they’ll love. 99% of the time when you ask women how to attract them it’s a similar generic answer. I’ll spare you from having to ask them yourself: “be confident, be funny, treat me well and take me to nice places/ do nice things for me.” Feel like a Chad yet? If you want to get good with girls then experience is king. Expecting a woman to give you in a few words the answer that will solve your dating woes is a painfully dense…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 06:03 AM
–

Dude it’s so ironic because I’ve dated some of the most liberal feminist women and they still love when I act traditional and take the lead. No amount of social programming can override you’re natural instincts, it just is what it is
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:01 PM
–

Yea that’s fair. I personally think as red pill has gotten more popular it’s devolved from its original purpose a lot. Many guys now use it as an excuse to bash women or vent their problems due to lack of success with them. I don’t think being redpill is inherently bad philosophy, but In recent years it’s started to get a bad rep for good reasons honestly. In the case of your ex it sounds like it led him down a stray path instead of helping him. Everyone processes information different, and the …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:00 PM
1

Yea that’s a good point… but it still begs the question, would you hang out with these atheist girls 1 on 1 frequently? Would you text them about hardships you’re going through, or ask them for advice, or grab a beer with them weekly? Or are they mostly social circle friends, coworkers, or college mates? I think another element of OPs argument is that most guys won’t put in a huge amount of effort to hang out with a girl platonically. It’s just not really worth it in most cases. Like if you alre…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:52 PM
–

Yea that’s fair. I am a social person and all my friends in the past have helped my charisma no doubt. I agree that once my social circle improves here I’ll probably get even better results. I guess my point is that other elements can contribute to your success as well, like where you live etc. But I completely agree that social skills are critical
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:46 PM
1

Just look at what’s happening to San Fran or New York. Homelessness everywhere, drugs and shit in the streets, murders on the daily, inflation a real estate prices are absurd, mass illegal immigration is encouraged, plans for reparations that will bankrupt the state…. How could I ever take your counter opinion seriously when the negative effects of these politics are blatantly evident?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:38 PM
–

She’s a great companion, gorgeous to behold, makes me feel good. Also I’m super kinky and she’s sexually compatible with me on a deeper and rarer level than most hookups have been. Also shes cute and cuddly and cooks so well. She’s the best
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 08:09 AM
–

Yea sure I’ll try to change your view. So hear me out, I had a great social circle and was living in LA. Lots of 5+ year friendships, different cliques, bunch of guy and girl friends. Had a pretty decent dating life but nothing crazy. Now 4 months ago I moved to the Midwest. The only person I know out here is my brother and his friends, but my personal social circle has been reduced. But guess what! I’ve banged more girls since I moved her than I did the last year I was in LA. So without a socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 08:05 AM
–

Can’t really tell if you’re being sarcastic but yea I am. Same applies to you though so you shouldn’t judge
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 07:42 AM
0

Do you even hear modern liberal talking points? They’re so damn progressive they’re trying to bring about the collapse of society sooner
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:59 AM
1

Yea my gf is feminist, probably because she went to university and heard the word “patriarchy” and “toxic masculinity” repeated a million times. Also her friend group is very progressive. She still expects me to be traditional guy, who takes care of her and does the manly shit, so all the feminism flies out the window when it comes to practice. I told her I think feminism is a joke and she got super heated and we argued about it but then she apologized. We usually try to avoid talking about this…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:57 AM
–

There’s a difference between “just be yourself and that’s enough” (blue pill) and “be authentic but also put in effort” (redpill). Faking it to try and impress women is what autistic or incel guys interpret the redpill to be. But all the redpill stuff I’ve seen that spoke to me was about legitimately trying to be a genuine person who works on improving themselves. Also the “nice guys” trope is about guys who are overly nice just to get sexual access. It’s transparent and a turn off. If you’re ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:47 AM
1

I come here to debate. It’s also fun seeing how wildly absurd some people’s beliefs are
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:37 AM
1

Hinge has worked pretty well for me honestly
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:36 AM
2

The way I see it, redpill is just a dose of reality in a world caught up in romance fantasy novels and movies. I don’t think manipulation is “redpill,” that’s just toxic. For me redpill is more about the fact that “blue pill” ideas, like soul mates, unconditional love etc. doesn’t exist, and in order succeed sexually as a man you have to bring certain things to the table (like confidence, leadership, money, good vibes, comfortable place to live etc.). And not gonna lie, since redpill opened my e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:29 AM
–

Sexual interest does have value. If it didn’t exist you wouldn’t be here typing this right now. In fact none of human society would exist. If you think everything is meaningless then sure I can understand your argument, but that doesn’t seem to be your view. Now I agree, someone’s sexual interest in you might have zero value to you. But being sexually interesting to at least someone is necessary if you ever want to have a family, or a relationship with a partner that loves and cares for you. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:58 AM
–

It’s not the men that determine it, it’s nature. No sexual interest = no babies = your lineage ceases to exist = you get wiped out due to natural selection. Maybe if you want to be childless, extinct, and despise being desired then sure it has no value to you personally, but objectively it does matter to the majority of people. And if you are sexually desirable, then sometimes creeps and bad people will desire you too… unfortunately it just comes with the territory. Just because bad can result f…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:36 AM
–

Even women I have frequent sex with rarely compliment me on appearance. They’re just hardwired to receive compliments and rarely give them. Honestly I don’t care because I know they’re attracted to me through other means, but my point is that avoiding sex isn’t the only reasons women rarely complement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:32 AM
–

Gotta love the “toxic masculinity” feminist talking point. Lmao. Yea toxic and bad men exist, of course, but masculinity isn’t inherently evil or toxic. In fact it’s a good and necessary force just like femininity is. And if masculinity were inherently bad then you’re shit out of luck trying to change it anyway. Feminism just decided to make the whole male gender the enemy by making an example out of the bad ones, and then goes on to complain about how everyone else is sexist… and then wonder wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:24 AM
–

Amazingly well put. OP fails to see that the attention and all that male interest is a blessing and a curse. Nothing is free in life and expecting it to all be rainbows and butterflies is foolishly unrealistic. It is actually a privilege in many ways, denying that is absurd. Being desired is one of a woman’s great powers. But it is also a “curse” in many ways, because of some of the points OP mentioned. You just have to accept it and use that knowledge to navigate life. You can’t change the whol…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:27 AM
1

So what? Some women just don’t want to date a guy that’s had dicks inside him just like some men don’t want to date women that have dicks on them. It’s really just a matter of preference and it’s futile trying to explain that kind of stuff. If there is a biological or evolutionary reason for such behavior, knowing it will probably just make you less happy. So stop seeking approval and be happy you found someone who likes you for you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:08 AM
1

There’s a big difference between acknowledging someone is attractive by general standards and being attracted to someone. Knowing your sister is attractive vs being attracted to her is like comparing black to red(neck). But tbh I actually agree with most of your points, and maybe I’m just playing devils avocados too much. I can kind of see where OP is coming from about friendships being a little different when you are physically attracted to the person, but realistically though, this is all just…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:00 AM
1

Yea that’s totally fair but it’s still not 100% purely platonic in that case. You can live as though it is, and it might even be really damn close (99.99%), but if you were drunk or high enough, or everyone you knew died in a tsunami except this friend, would a relationship still be utterly impossible with them? Is there no chance in hell you could ever see yourself having sex with them, even if circumstances in your life were vastly different? If the answer is yes then sure maybe it’s 100% plat…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 02:37 AM
1

Absolutely nothing is intuitive about your reasoning. Lots of men hit on women who reject them, but nothing sexual happens. By your logic this is also a platonic relationship. Conversely, just because sexual intent isn’t expressed doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. If you are physically attracted to someone then you are sexually attracted to them. That’s literally what physical attraction is… there can be reasons why you’re not trying to have sex with them but you don’t view them in a purely platoni…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 02:26 AM
2

If you’re both physically and emotionally attracted to someone then by definition you like them beyond platonic means… maybe you were smarter when you were 17
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 09:07 PM
2

No such thing as escalating too quickly unless it’s done in an awkward or inappropriate setting. If a girl is into you she’ll bang you on the first few dates. But you really have to know how to read the sign and know how to escalate. Context matters a lot, but you only really learn from experience. So go for it when she’s giving you the Bambie eyes and you’re golden
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 07:06 PM
3

Yea forreal. Relationships satisfy in a completely different way than friendships. OP just trying to justify their loneliness and make it our problem to solve why they should even try to put in an effort. And if they’re happier being alone just do that? Clearly many people find marriage worth it because they found a partner that makes their life better
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 08:03 AM
–

Well at least from my perspective as a guy in my late 20s, I’m looking to find a long term partner that can lead to marriage. When I date a girl that is younger than me and has a good personality I date her with serious intentions. If she’s older than me then I usually think of it as more short term (and I’ll communicate this too). Many reasons for it, but if I’m gonna commit for life, I’d rather be with a 24-25 year old who can still have children a decade later if we decide to. Wheras if I dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 03:41 PM
1

More proof that modern feminism is a toxic mindset that rots your brain
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 05:50 PM
3

HAHA! Funny joke. If anything I’d argue it’s the complete opposite. Due to social media and other things many women nowadays are so self-centered they only think about themselves. They expect a man to do the planning, paying for dates, comforting her when she gets emotional etc etc. And what do they have to offer a guy besides sex? Most of the times it’s nothing really. I’m happy to do all those things because it works, but to turn around and say men provide nothing only applies to the guys who …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 05:34 PM
1

It would help but that’s not the main issue men have when it comes to attracting women. I’ve had girlfriends while being skinny as a stick. Attraction for women goes much deeper than physical appearance. Physical appearance is a much bigger priority for men when it comes to attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 05:05 AM
0

Women don’t care about your past, more about your current state and future potential. Caring about the past is more something men do I.e. body count mattering etc. I was a late bloomer, didn’t lose my virginity till I was 20. But since then I’ve gone out and dated a lot and developed decent social skills. Literally no woman asks me or cares if I bloomed late or not. What matters is how I make them feel in the present
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 01:26 AM
1

In my opinion a bigger reason has to do with the fact that a lot of guys completely stop trying after 10+ years in a marriage. Like no more romantic letters, fancy dates, etc. That seems to kill attraction and libido a lot. There are plenty of long term relationships / marriages that aren’t dead bedrooms, which imo completely negates your theory that women need constant sexual variety to be satisfied. Also, most girls I’ve dated want serious commitment far more than I do. If sexual variety was a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/23 05:15 PM
2

Society as you know it will collapse if birth rates continue to plummet. You might even start seeing those effects in the next 20-30 years
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 03:46 AM
2

Okay yea, to be fair I’m probably thinking about the topics I generally choose to engage with. No doubt there is an abundance of losers who complain and blame women for their lack of interaction with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 03:53 PM
1

Yea I agree. But I think most of the topics on this sub are more about how women are delusionally picky (which is to their own long term detriment) or about how men are far too desperate and or simpy (which also to their own detriment). Losers who can’t even talk to a woman not having success is a no-brainer and not even worth discussing
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 06:42 AM
–

Having a father to show you traits of masculinity and who’s in a successful lasting relationship is an example in of itself. Clearly he’s doing something right for it to have lasted so long, and children are smart enough to pick up on the subtle cues. Acting like you needed him to give you a whole bachelors degree on seduction in order to have learned something about opposite-sex attraction is a mind-blowingly naive perspective. It’s quite surprising to me that you’re 40 and think in such simpli…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 06:33 AM
2

Do you even know what “the wall” even means? Falling behind because you’re failing in a certain area is not the wall. That’s why self improvement channels exist in the first place dumbass
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 06:03 AM
1

Humans are very complex but ultimately it stems from a biological reality that women are the limiting sex because their reproduction rate is much slower. Therefore males are forced to vie for female attention and access due to the imbalance of sexual needs vs availability. Women are also more vulnerable during the process of procreation. Over millions of years this has translated to men needing to compete and woo women, whereas the women select. There is minimal evolutionary need for women to de…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 06:00 AM
10

Bruh you have to be dense to think that it’s not a very common male standard to lack the desire to commit to a woman who is known to be a hoe. Maybe you’re brainwashed by the modern feminist narrative, but there is absolutely a strong reason to not invest your whole life into someone who is very promiscuous vs someone who isn’t. There’s too many reasons to even begin explaining. At some point it’s not even worth debating with people like you who are so invested in that silly narrative. “Sexual h…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 05:48 AM
3

What is this bullshit study lmao. I could never believe whatever this sloppy “research” says. Almost every girl I’ve ever met prefers to be in a relationship, they always talk about it, seek it out, and despise being single, EVEN when they try to pretend like they’re a “boss girl queen that don’t need no man.” In fact girls that are single for too long become bitter and pretty miserable. Clearly your study is blatantly wrong which is made even more evident by the mental dissonance you’re experie…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 05:07 PM
1

Yea sure whatever you say
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 08:55 PM
2

Bruh you really comparing a dating mindset to nazis lmao. That’s crazy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 08:39 PM
1

We can live without most women… it’s just that so many men have adopted a strategy of simping in order to get access because this generation tells them that’s what you need to do. In reality, the more independent you are of caring so much if a girl likes you or not, the more likely she is to think you got something going for yourself. It’s really not that hard, you just need some self respect
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:57 PM
2

Depends how much older, but it’s not just about money, also experience. I can tell you that when I was a younger guy, I had no idea what to do or say to make a girl feel great on dates. Now, it’s just easier for me since I’ve been on plenty and I know better how women like to be treated. Girls younger than me have told me they like how I treat them better than younger dudes (I’m in my late 20s), but deep down I know I was also an idiot when I was younger that had no idea what to do to keep a gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:53 PM
1

RP is not about manipulation and shaming tactics in order to get dates lmfaoo. That’s just bitter dudes who don’t get it and use it as an excuse to blame women. Sure there are inept dudes that can’t get laid and spew misogynistic things and believe in red or black pills, but they also are completely missing the point. RP is about caring for women in a masculine way that also doesn’t compromise your integrity. Being the best version of yourself, taking care of a woman the way she wants to be take…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:48 PM
1

I think you’re wrong in your assessment. Ever since RP my dating life has gotten better. I treat a girl I like as an absolute queen, know my role in providing and paying on dates, make her feel safe, avoid being indecisive and do my part to make sure she feels comfortable. Yet I also have more self respect, and won’t simp for anyone or blow up her phone if she doesn’t want to talk to me, or tolerate rude or disrespectful behavior. I’m sure people can misinterpret redpill as there are a lot of id…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:35 PM
2

It’s not even always about choosing better, but having the balls to have standards and boundaries. A lot of girls will comply if you’re doing your job as a man (providing etc.) and not simping over everything she does just to get some sexual access.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:22 PM
–

I wish I could post this on a billboard in every major city. Time for the feminazis to wake the hell up. Feminism used to be a great cause, now it’s just a weapon of self victimization as an attempt to gain privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:21 PM
–

Yup, and those blue pillers don’t get any action. I’m dating this one girl and I know dudes that will simp and not even get her attention. I asked her at some point if she’s a feminist, and she got super defensive and went on a tirade about patriarchy and how dare I talk to her about female oppression as a man etc. It got into some crazy fight and basically told her we should probably cut things off and she started crying and apologizing. Then we smashed the same night. I’m not even hiding the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:15 PM
–

You’re last paragraph really says it all. When a partner is going through a hard time, the default mentality shouldn’t be “oh wow look at this desperate dependent leech holding onto me with all they got. I can do better.” You literally just showcased the same mindset a lot of women have and that we are discussing in this sub. Also, I’m not saying it’s impossible he got bitter after losing his job, but the fact that she had an affair before breaking up and divorcing him proves to me she’s not a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 04:02 PM
15

Completely false. Blue pill is just a Disney fantasy. I knew a married couple that both had great jobs in specific fields, the man lost his job and couldn’t find any good replacements. Eventually he just got a shitty low paying job so that he could at least be making something, and his wife had an affair with a doctor and the filed for divorce. This happens very often. You can’t rely on “love” to save you or keep your partner around as a man. You have to be a provider in some sort of capacity, e…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 08:53 PM
1

As someone with a big healthy and happy family I know many women who would say having children is one of the best things that happened in their life. They love their children more than life itself, telling any of them “oh but you get stretch marks and saggy skin!” would make them cringe with how petty and superficial it sounds lol. These aren’t good arguments, the main point of relationships is to start a family. If you just care about your “dating market value” then sure, just fuck around, neve…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 05:39 AM
27

It’s not just about sex either. If she’s been with guys who can afford to provide her luxurious items/gifts/vacations or other things like great sense of humor etc. she’ll never feel fully satisfied with a guy whos closer to the average or making less.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 08:55 PM
–

That’s literally the whole point of their argument, that status and wealth makes men attractive. And you’re just confirming it. He’s still bagging 25 year old models at 45 but would be a nobody if he was an average joe
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 06:32 PM
–

It’s completely possible to be mid at a healthy weight lmao, your argument is pretty pointless. Not to mention that being slightly overweight doesn’t automatically make you unattractive. Lot of curvy girls that are way pretty. So yes, everything considered, including her age and physical and facial appearance, I would say Bonet is definitely MID compared to the vast amount of other women out there. She’s basically a grandma and y’all acting like she’s such a great person to partner up with, the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 06:27 PM
1

It seems like you’re missing the whole point of the argument. The point is that because they choose to find a long term partner in their 30s they’re sacrificing a lot of the leverage / SMV they had when younger and therefore their partner options are more limited. The single cat lady is the hyperbolic / meme-ified expression of the general principle, but few genuinely it’s impossible to find a partner if you’re a promiscuous woman in her 30s lmao. Assuming we aren’t using your interpretation of …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 08:50 PM
1

A man is sexy when he knows how to seduce a woman. It’s a delicate dance that many young guys are clueless to. I’m late 20s now and have better “success” dating now than I ever did before, and it’s because I’ve learned a lot and know what I’m doing. I don’t think anyone believes a 60 yo man is sexier than a 22 yo, according to physical features especially. But age and experience tend to be conducive towards men building the traits they need that women find attractive: charisma, reputation, sense…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 08:04 PM
1

Well you also have explanations for your own worldview, albeit slightly less plausible. It’s mostly hypothetical. I’m not saying men and women aren’t similar or can act in similar ways etc. but certain realities about are genders definitely do affect our life experiences and the way we might behave. Culture does not override millions of years of evolution. Even when it comes to similar actions such as promiscuity, the drives that motivate us to such behavior are different. For men, the subconsci…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 02:55 PM
–

I’ve met some incels before. One of them was actually my friend before his inability to get laid led him down a very dark path of buying into black pill ideology and other toxic beliefs that made him a terrible friend and person to be around. He was really short but worked out, had light autism and was socially awkward. Every time he tried talking to women he would be super intense to the point of weirding women out. Also he would lower his standards a little bit but not to the point of getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 05:28 PM
1

I agree with you that committed relationships are generally what women want, but that doesn’t mean slut-shaming has zero consequences or effects. Even if minimal, shaming tactics are generally known to affect people’s behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 08:33 AM
1

That’s false. One of the most successful guys I know in terms of hookups and dating treats women fairly poorly. He’ll wine and dine them, but will take ages to respond, has cheated on multiple past partners, and just overall acts like he doesn’t give a damn about them. Obviously that’s different from being an overt misogynist, but he doesn’t “respect” women in the sense that he treats them as people who’s feelings should be taken into consideration Not to mention I’ve literally spoken to girls w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 08:05 AM
9

I’m from Eastern Europe and always sing praises for the women of my country. Once I moved to the US I noticed a massive difference. The materialistic and clout chasing culture of this place has definitely taken a toll, on both genders but definitely the women as well
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 08:32 PM
–

No really, it’s important to hear other perspectives even if we disagree with them. No progress or self reflection can happen in an echo chamber. It just becomes the repetition of the same ideas
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 07:44 PM
–

Well then glad you’re here to balance things out!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 07:00 PM
–

Well tough luck for you, plenty of men and women disagree with your sentiment, and they will have children and they will have happy families. I’m really starting to think you’re just a troll at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 06:57 PM
–

What excuse does a woman have for not performing more than 50% of the childcare duties if she doesn’t have a job, is provided a place to stay and has her bills paid for, and is more essential to a child’s life in terms of nurturing and feeding (breast milk)? None of your questions would challenge any man who genuinely cares about his wife and has an agreement with her to raise a family in that kind of context. You really think you did something with those questions there huh
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 06:27 PM
–

Interesting… Regarding your last point, it depends who you ask. I think a lot of people on both sides of this subreddit tend to have some extreme views, and if you’re complaining about something that supposedly aligns with your worldview then definitionally you’re a hypocrite. Personally I’m more than happy to pay for dates and act more “traditional,” but also prefer to date someone who understands that my role and expectations will be different than hers. Nothing wrong with a 50/50 equal partne…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 06:07 PM
–

It depends on the family context. If a man is working constantly to provide and his wife is happy to be a SAHM, I don’t think it should be half. Same would apply for a wife that mostly works and a SAHD. But if they’re making a similar amount and both work, it should be shared more equally. Reality isn’t so black and white as to have one absolute solution apply to every situation or context.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 05:45 PM
–

When did I say that was modern dynamics? I believe a father should play a big role in his child’s upbringing as well. You’re just making a lot of assumptions based on preconceived biases
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 05:07 PM
–

This may shock you, but sometimes people on the internet are honest. Not everything is an attempt at clout chasing lmao. Just because someone said something that doesn’t match your preconceived worldview, doesn’t automatically make it a “lie”.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 05:01 PM
0

Have you ever thought that women bare children while men cannot? Or that men can greatly increase their reproductive rate with many partners, wheras a woman’s reproductive rate does not change regardless of the amount of partners? Clearly there are differences between men and women. These realities have absolutely nothing to do with culture
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 10:17 AM
1

“Men and women are different” is just a fact of reality and you just have to deal with it. Yes, a fact can be used by someone to “justify” a shitty argument, which most of the arguments you laid out honestly sound like something an angry 15 year old would make. But that doesn’t change the fact that men and women truly are different, and we experience life differently, pursue mates differently, have different hormones and reproductive roles. I think your last paragraph is key because it’s true. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 10:10 AM
3

Attractive women are highly more likely to be extraverted because of the phenomenon of the “positive feedback loop.” When people want to look like you, be you, be with you, they’ll do things to gain your attention, invite you to events and parties, they’ll even laugh at your shitty jokes etc. This positive reinforcement helps someone gain confidence and the cycle continues. Often times the hottest people with the smallest personalities are the loudest because even without having to develop any g…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 10:02 AM
2

Sounds like a bad experience but far from all conservatives are like that. Many respect their partners and don’t view each other as “unequals” or even think in those terms. Some can have a fairly modern mindset while understanding that we play different dynamics because of our gender. Being a “conservative” is no excuse for being a dictator or a cheating asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 09:40 AM
5

Most liberal guys I know have less success with dating on average compared to the more conservative guys I know. And I’ve lived in super liberal cities like LA. And just because a guy acts liberal publicly doesn’t necessarily mean he totally is. I know it’s anecdotal, but I have good reason to believe this applies on a wider scale as well. It just makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 09:29 AM
0

She thinks she’s liberal because she buys into all of the “narratives” pushed by the left. Whether she truly is or not has yet to be decided
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 09:27 AM
11

Being pro choice doesn’t make you liberal. I’m fairly conservative and still have beliefs that may seem to indicate I’m a “liberal”. There are many things I believe that would tend to classify me as “not conservative.” But I still am in many regards, even if I don’t talk about it much or make it obvious with all of my viewpoints. It’s hard to be masculine and liberal enough to treat women the exact same as you would a man, especially in the context of a relationship. Conservatism is not just abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 09:17 AM
2

You are pretty spot on. Liberalism as an ideology is in many regards contradictory to masculinity. Egalitarianism, being agreeable, and emotional are incompatible with core masculine traits. Hierarchal, assertive, and stoic are traits that are compatible with masculinity however, and are valued far more by conservative men (because it doesn’t contradict their worldview).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 09:04 AM
12

What’s bullshit about it? Its just her experience. Plus how can you believe in 50/50 completely equal partnerships, and then be a “provider” in the traditional sense? You’re basically a hypocrite for buying her flowers and not splitting the bill at that point. Not to mention, why should someone be doing all that extra stuff if they’re “equals”? It’s contradictory. I’d say her take makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 08:46 AM
1

You clearly have no ability to understand nuance
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 04:22 AM
1

This difference isn’t one of accountability. Women saying they should’ve chosen better still means the guy was shit and her only mistake was in letting him have access. Men on the other hand act similarly in that their ego prevents them from seeing their own faults, and hence they usually blame the woman for their problems. Both parties blame each other, and most women WILL complain that their ex was the problem and didn’t treat them right. Another thing I can think of the fact that every man, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 07:51 PM
1

Yea but the opposite happens in reality. Men who have high addictions to porn still want the real thing, yet they don’t have the self respect to not simp and pay for virtual online girls who don’t give them anything real in return. They become so desperate for a real connection that they’ll simp in real life more. Yes dating apps have changed the balance too but that’s a separate issue. And we’re mostly talking about porn addicts, which are many, and not necessarily the casual user. I know a fri…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 02:57 PM
1

Yea sure you can say porn is great for neutering the masses, and making men sexually stunted helps divert their energy from starting wars and revolutions, but I would argue that the lack of relationships is a far bigger driver in creepiness today. Many men have zero understanding of intersexual dynamics because they grew up watching porn and are now adult creeps that harrass and send consensual dick pics etc. These men are also more depressed and therefore easier to manipulate and less in contro…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 10:41 PM
2

Okay well I don't know their thoughts obviously. You're focusing a lot on what was perhaps a semantic miscalculation but my general point was that they haven't acted on such thoughts if they existed. My overall point still stands. And if I thought what my parents said was absolute truth I'd still be religious. You're making a lot of assumptions which are just crazy lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 09:57 PM
1

Do you really have to vilify me to get your point across? I know they're human and messed up in a lot of ways. We have our disagreements. I don't think I said anything outrageously fantastical by saying I know they haven't cheated on each other, especially given our frequent communication, their beliefs and religious background, and zero suggestive evidence of such an occurrence. You must really think cheating is inevitable huh
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 09:47 PM
0

Yea I actually do have a great idea. Maybe you have no idea what its like to know your family, but I'm actually very close with mine. Contrary to you're pessimistic worldview, there are actually people who exist who don't feel the urge to cheat on their partners because of what may have happened in the past. So why should I settle for anything less?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 09:19 PM
2

Yea but you're completely ignoring the whole dynamic and its implications. Sex for women is way easier, and they're usually the ones rejecting or accepting intimacy from many men. But men have to decide if they're getting on one knee and commit longterm. If she's just letting a ton of dudes inside her, clearly she has low-standards or is a loose woman because most of the dudes hitting her up are scumbags - broke, abusive, commitment issues, losers etc. Crazy thing is that on the contrary, if a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 09:09 PM
1

That argument about men having the right to cheat because of "lost experience" is utter nonsense, I'm surprised you'd use that as any form of "logical" grounds to justify cheating. Also I completely disagree with that "logic" in general. It assumes men and women are driven by the exact same drives, which is far from true. Also my parents could be considered a case of both having very different levels of experience, but once they got married, both have been loyally committed for 25 years. Never o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 08:50 PM
2

It's not hypocritical because men and women are different and so the expectations out of our partners are different. It's about time people stop making arguments based on the fantasy of blank slate equalism, the idea that men and women are identical in every regard. Even though we are equally valuable (in fact it can be argued that the average woman is more valuable then the average man), we are not equal in regards to our behaviors, expectations, or even performance in many areas. If you're bas…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 07:04 PM
-1

Thats definitely not why most guys want a girl with a lower bodycount. It has more to do with the likelihood of her cheating than him wanting to continuously cheat while hoping she stays at home LMAO. You're thinking in 1600 terms
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/23 06:54 PM
2

It’s a shaming tactic that generally older women use to discourage it. Same thing as slut-shaming, which is a shaming tactic men use to discourage promiscuity in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 03:56 PM
1

I definitely agree with you that this sub attracts all different kind of resentment-ridden guys, too many of which are misogynistic and have incel-tendencies. Not trying to back them up in anyway, as that would be a job better suited for the therapist they desperately need. I was mainly trying to pitch an alternative reasoning as to why OP doesn’t see many men thinking in terms of “the right woman will come to me even if I’m studying in my bedroom all day.”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 09:54 AM
5

Just because you’re capable of having many kids doesn’t mean you want them. And just because our bodies are designed for many partners doesn’t mean everyone will like that. Even in bonobos, which are perhaps the most sexually liberated animals I’ve read about, it has been suggested that their vast promiscuity may have stemmed as a strategy to prevent infanticide because it confuses paternity… And that confusion of paternity is why males generally have an issue with sharing females. Females don’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 09:37 AM
6

Hate to break it to ya but sperm competition has relevance to all living male animals. Also you’re completely ignoring the underlying implications, which is that competition exists. Just because chimpanzees are very promiscuous doesn’t negate the fact that copulating with many males is harmful to the fitness of the individual male chimp that’s trying to reproduce. And despite female chimps high promiscuity, male chimps still mate guard sometimes; alpha chimps still try to bar other chimps from m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 08:45 AM
1

So you’re saying that even when guys loathe certain traits in women they’re still very accepting of them? Personally I don’t think that’s what it is. It’s more about the fact that as a guy you have to pursue for a relationship, or sit by and be ignored while other men are putting in the effort. Even in the case where you do meet the right woman, you’ll still be expected to pursue her, wheras a woman meeting the perfect guy expects him to pursue her. That’s why this whole line of reasoning that “…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 08:18 AM
2

Because as a man (to give you a little sports analogy) your dating approach just HAS to be “offensive” in order to get any results. Men are vying for sexual access from women, and women are playing the “defensive” game in that they’re either rejecting or accepting those that approach. Even if a guy finds the right woman, he STILL has to approach her and put in that effort to make her believe he’s the right guy to be with, so the idea of the right woman just automatically accepting him for who he…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 07:55 AM
2

In terms of dating it’s definitely “easier” to be a woman. Yea you’ll have a some bad apples and have to deal with awkward or uncomfortable rejections, but the evolutionary pressure has always been on males to compete for females. Having a waiter come to you and ask which of the 20 dishes you’d like this evening is a lot less pressure than being one of the 20 chefs that has to cook the meal and hope you buy his course. Abundance always has an advantage over scarcity in terms of selection choice …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 06:57 AM
1

Of course looks matter to both men and women. But in most cases I can spend a few hours with a girl and know if I would be down to date. On the other hand, I’ve seen and experienced many examples of girls not even consider dating until weeks have gone by and they realize they like a guy for reasons that go beyond appearances. Yes both genders are similar and value similar things, but the level of importance of certain factors definitely differs
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 06:52 AM
2

It’s not just about being insecure, it’s about being logical. Sperm competition is a real thing, and if you’re banking your whole life on committing to one woman, it’s in your best interest to make sure she doesn’t have a habit of sleeping around with dozens of men. Who’s to say you wont just be yet another guy she replaces when things get a little rough or when she wants some fresh excitement? Actions speak louder than words
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 06:41 AM
2

You absolutely can. You really think men and women have the exact same life experiences, hormones, and mating strategies?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 06:32 AM
2

Not really. Countless animal studies have shown that males almost always hate sharing a female. Look up sperm competition https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_competition
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 06:28 AM
2

So a woman without a bachelors degree isn’t a whole person?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 06:14 AM
1

Intelligence is attractive, but it’s only one of the factors to consider. Also, just having an education doesn’t automatically make you intelligent either, which is why I do agree that many women over estimate the value of their degree as an indicator of what they deserve partner-wise. Yes of course a guy would prefer a good-looking smart girl over a dumb bimbo, but I will say that many of the college educated women I’ve come across aren’t as intelligent as they think they are. In fact many I’ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 05:50 AM
1

Inceldom is more closely aligned with black pill to be honest. I consider myself “red pilled” to some slight extent in that I don’t believe the Disney fairytale of soulmates etc. but I’ll still respect women and am fairly liberal in many regards. Aligning with some redpill philosophy doesn’t automatically make you an incel. However, I met a friend who was involuntarily celibate, and over time he got more and more extreme, went from normal guy, to redpill, to hardcore redpill, to straight up blac…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/23 09:06 PM
10

Being a single cat lady is much more about attitude than looks. If you’re a b*tch constantly and think you’re entitled to everything you’re significantly more likely to end up single at a later stage in life, regardless of how hot you are. One of the hottest women I’ve ever been with is perpetually in relationships and also perpetually single at the same time. Now she’s in her mid 30s and still hasn’t found a stable relationship. Knowing her and how narcissistic she behaves I wouldn’t be surpris…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 04:14 PM
0

No one said men don’t date their age range or that or that they only want young girls lmao. We’re talking generally a guy will not seriously commit to a 40 yo woman if he’s 25, but the opposite is much more common. And the reasons are extremely commonsense. Do you think a smart man in his twenties that wants to start a family should marry a 40-something year old over someone who’s younger? The logical decision is no, regardless of your idealogical beliefs. Also most of the CEOs you mentioned hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 07:21 PM
-1

How do blue pillers explain Leonardo DiCaprio or the fact that most yacht parties are filled with young girls? Reality isn’t so black and white. Just because you’re rich doesn’t mean you’ll choose or even want a partner that fits into the preferences of the majority. Personal beliefs and values, character and many other things also matter when choosing a partner and a level-headed red piller wouldn’t deny that. Besides, we don’t know much about Bezos personal life and for all we know she could b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 06:47 PM
–

Most things in life are transactional, whether you accept it or not. This question is asked because some people expect you to be a whole caretaker while they contribute absolutely nothing back to you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 02:18 PM
3

Men can be just as irrational as women, in terms of decision making, of course. But if a man is just as emotional as the average woman, especially given that he’s not full of estrogen and going through massive hormonal flushes once a month, then that man has many issues. There’s a reason why stoicism has been a respected and expected male trait for thousands of years
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 08:46 PM
4

I don’t think any reasonable person in the red pill community thinks every man becomes sexier just because they’re older lmao. The idea is that experience / ability to provide stability is an important attraction factor for women, and generally those things are more likely to be attained with time and age. It’s not the age in itself that makes a man “better.” Obviously if you’re a loser, or an inc*l, or a homeless dude slinging meth on the street you won’t be attractive to a woman regardless of …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 06:21 AM
1

I’m not the one who invented the idea of chivalry nor do I ever bring it up in conversation lmao. I’m just alluding to what people have historically considered chivalry. I agree that it’s an irrelevant concept, I was just saying you’re not inherently sexist if you act in ways traditionally considered “chivalrous” in the context of this discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 05:50 PM
1

That’s pathetic. If his true intentions are for validation and not out of a genuine desire to look after you then I’d say it’s a major red flag. I can see why you’d think that behavior is sexist when dealing with men like that, but just because some men are insecure validation-seeking pricks does not mean all chivalry is inherently sexist
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 05:22 PM
1

I’ve never dated a girl that would open car doors for me, nor is that the kind of kindness that I seek from a girl. Kindness is not the same thing as chivalry, which you seem to not understand
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 05:20 PM
1

There’s a difference between being chivalrous and being kind, and it seems like you have the two confused. Women rarely act “chivalrous” towards men, in fact they often expect the man to prove his worth on dates, which is where chivalry sometimes kicks in. I’ve dated several girls who complained I don’t open the car door for them, so it’s not inherently bad like you falsely imply. Also yes, random women aren’t owed favors from anyone, including men. I wouldn’t act chivalrous towards a random dud…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 08:46 PM
0

Imagine thinking that opening the car door for your girl is an act of attention-seeking… I bet you’ve never had anyone act chivalrous towards you your entire life. You clearly have no idea what it’s about
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 08:28 PM
14

Honestly you wouldn’t be a smart man if you did favors or provided things for a random woman who gives nothing back to you. Many women try to make it sound like it’s men’s obligation to protect or help out all women… when in reality it’s not anyone’s obligation. I heard a story on KTLA yesterday about how a couple were arguing on the walk of fame in Hollywood and a guy tried to intervene to help out the woman. The bf pulled out a gun and shot the guy In the head and then both him and his girl ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 03:21 PM
1

There’s a reason why they call it “game” because at the end of the day it is a delicate dance that requires certain moves. Men usually look for sex, but then are quick to move on to the next, wheras a woman generally seeks longer term commitment from a man she likes. It boils down to mating strategy, even in intelligent beings like humans. Commitment is harder to prove than physical attractiveness, therefore women will “test” men (consciously or not) in certain ways for them to prove their provi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 11:00 AM
1

Facts. I wouldn’t say its necessarily inaccurate either
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:24 AM
1

Generalization is not inherently racist or misogynistic… if you actually believe that then there’s literally no point in debating someone as dense as you
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 08:51 PM
5

The world functions off of generalities. So do statistical models used to predict future outcomes and a lot of other things that could be named. Maybe stereotyping can be claimed to be morally bad, but generalizing large and complex data sets is a common and natural human behavior. Saying it’s never fine to generalize is a generalization in itself that demonizes most rational individuals
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 02:14 PM
5

Dude if you’re asking for women’s advice on how to get girls you’re already doing it wrong. Just be yourself and be confident, pursue who you want to, if they are down with it then cool. If not, move on. No point in over analyzing what women think you should do to get girls. Also the game is about subtlety. You can pursue someone while being totally friendly and chill and not making it overtly sexual in the first 15 minutes of meeting them
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 07:31 PM
3

Yea usually the ones with the least success have the most resentment. Definitely not the right mindset to have if you want to get a partner or have a happy life in general
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 04:06 AM
1

No one’s “overriding” evolution by developing rockets or smartphones lmao. If anything our technological developments are proof of our ability to adapt and evolve silly. Also you’re using a straw-man argument. I don’t see how technology and urbanization has any relevance to my argument that getting into a relationship with a woman who has multiple partners is less ideal than one who doesn’t. I can even give concrete examples: your reproductive capacity reduced by sharing one woman, you also don’…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 03:20 AM
3

I never said single mothers are trash what?? It’s just a different type of relationship. If you’re partnered with someone that has a kid theres no way you can just completely ignore that kids existence. And yes, likely you will be expected to step in and help care for the kid to some degree (which is a completely reasonable expectation of a partner). I’m not saying these things are bad at all but it’s definitely a factor that many guys consider before partnering with a single mother, as much as …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 03:07 AM
1

What’s even your argument? People like to fuck so that means it makes logical sense to get into a committed relationship where you’re likely to get cucked? Men should fight an evolutionary instinct that has their best interest in mind just because? Lmao, bravo you really just convinced me with that genius logic. We weren’t just talking about casual sex between people, which is a far better alternative to whatever you’re suggesting… we were talking about polygamous relationships (which have expec…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 02:37 AM
1

My point isn’t about how frequently either of those cases occur, that’s really not so important. My point is more about the fact that polyandry inherently implies that a certain male partner is deemed as genetically or socially insufficient, as a woman’s reproductive capacity does not increase with more partners. Her only benefit to promiscuity is that she may get inseminated by a genetically or socially “higher quality” male. This also brings the risk that at least one of her partners is gettin…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 12:39 AM
1

When women say they want commitment they mean from a guy they like. Usually they are drawn to the top males. What’s so hard to understand? Obviously they could get commitment from someone in their range, but would you happily commit to someone who doesn’t meet your standards? Most likely no
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:06 PM
2

It’s not that she’s a slut, it’s more that it’s a huge sacrifice to spend resources and time on a child that’s not yours. Most guys aren’t willing to make that sacrifice. But I don’t think being a “slut” is the turn off in that situation, it’s more about providing for and dealing with a kid that will always come before you and isn’t yours
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:59 PM
3

Just because you are financially savvy does not mean you are intelligent or successful in every other regard. If you marry someone who is known for cheating on her last 5 boyfriends I would consider you either desperate or an idiot, no matter what your financial circumstances are Also, just because most men would prefer non-promiscuous women, doesn’t mean they’ll always get that or that they aren’t willing to settle. Two of my best friends are big players that rarely take girls seriously. Recent…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:49 PM
1

I have never seen a girl maintain two guys in a relationship long term, yet the opposite occurs not too infrequently. There’s a reason for this. It’s just the fact that 2 men with 1 girl is a natural L for the men, and every man knows this deep down (committing time and resources to a woman and child that may not even be yours). 2 girls with 1 man who can provide and take care of them on the other hand isn’t inherently an L, in fact you could argue it’s a W even for the girls. This isn’t some re…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:44 PM
2

I’m not the best guy to ask. I love curvy girls. I’ve dated girls all sizes and generally prefer bigger girls. “Society’s” view just the opinion of the majority. But honestly fuck what most people think if it doesn’t resonate with you. You got one life so do you and enjoy whoever makes you feel good
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:35 PM
0

Even if AT is a bad person like they claim, it doesn’t change the fact that he spoke certain truths that many people resonated with. The fact of the matter is that women ultimately do prefer quality over quantity. And their actions show that. Men on the other hand prioritize quantity many times. It’s just how we are hardwired by nature, trying to achieve our optimal mating goals
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:32 PM
2

Even if Tate is a bad person like they claim, it doesn’t change the fact that he spoke certain truths that many people resonated with. The fact of the matter is that women ultimately do prefer quality over quantity. And their actions show that. Men on the other hand prioritize quantity many times. It’s just how we are hardwired by nature, trying to achieve our optimal mating goals
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:32 PM
1

In my experience, even when a girl “approaches” it’s more that she just signals interest. She’s still putting the ball in your court and expecting you to make the moves / do the courting. And that’s not bad, because that’s how it is designed to be by nature. Just accept that ultimately approaching and sealing the deal is your responsibility. Her responsibility is to keep you around after sex. If she doesn’t treat you great and is not relationship material, then just enjoy the intimacy while it l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:28 PM
1

Yea she’s capable of that, but so what? Most men would f*** a decently cute girl if she let them. But would you ever take a woman like her seriously? Who just gives it up to a bunch of randoms for travel trivia? Lmao. Most men with any form of sense wouldn’t. In the end those actions decrease her chances of getting a quality guy she likes to commit to her. Being promiscuous is the optimal mating strategy for males (across all species). For women, it’s an easy possibility but not the optimal choi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:21 PM
2

Welcome to the real world. I think your analysis is pretty spot on. That’s why as a guy it’s important to get good with girls, and then be able to choose the best option available. You’ll rarely be lucky enough to get a good wife by giving your all to the first girl that gives you attention. Keep it moving
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:06 PM
1

Don’t let it bother you because it’s always been that way. Besides, there are double standards for both genders. Women get sex and attention easily, but there are also negative associations with them being promiscuous, wheras a guy will need tons effort and status to achieve that but will be admired for being promiscuous once he does it. Also, you ultimately choose who you associate with and get with. If things like that bother you, which they do for a lot of guys, then just don’t commit to some…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 08:42 PM
2

Copy that
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 11:23 PM
1

Well studies actually show that the less previous partners a woman has had, the more likely it is that the marriage is going to last. I have no clue why you’d think someone who’s been around the block is a better bet for a LTR... Besides, unless there’s a 10+ year age gap, it’s really not a big deal. Just say that you’re insecure about your age and young pretty girls don’t even look your way if that’s what it’s really about
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 08:11 PM
0

Keep coping and denying reality. I’m not bitter just because I’m pointing out your delusion https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/high-octane-women/201109/meet-the-least-happy-people-in-america?amp
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:49 PM
1

Proving your point about what? I’m not bitter in the least lmao. Stop projecting just because my comment offended you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:30 PM
0

I quoted a study and you’re just spewing some BS you probably saw on Instagram or a buzzfeed article. If a man is in his mid 40s there are still plenty of chances to start a family, whereas a woman is screwed and completely infertile. I ain’t ever met a middle aged woman who failed at her reproductive goal of having offspring and was super happy about that fact. If she is happy about it then she’s psychologically unwell
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:24 PM
2

I mean maybe if you reread your own post you’ll get a dose of self-awareness. Men can get bitter with age if they have been unsuccessful with the opposite sex like you’re describing. But women get bitter the more men they deal with. The older a woman gets, the more shitty men she’s dealt with, the more she thinks all men are the same, act a certain way, or not worth dealing with/ compromising for. You are apparently young and already getting a mild case of bitterness, imagine what it’ll be like …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:47 AM
4

You have any who the most depressed and least happy demographic of person is in the US? Single women in their 40s with no children working professional jobs. The stats don’t lie
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:40 AM
2

The whole point of having a dadbod is that you’re already a dad and being at your physical peak isn’t as important anyway. You’re just enjoying the good life with your fam. But yea, using the dadbod thing as an excuse to be a fat slob is pretty delusional and harmful
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:39 AM
8

In fact we value INEXPERIENCE. 100x better than someone who’s done everything and is difficult to excite
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:36 AM
2

I mean you basically just described several solid logical reasons why younger women make better partners and then proceeded to do extreme mental gymnastics to fog your own brain into not understanding it. I don’t even feel the need to respond your question since I think you already understand it on a deeper level… but keep telling yourself it doesn’t matter and marry a 35 year old woman. Doing us all a favor honestly
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:35 AM
1

I mean I would debate you, but there’s clearly no point to debate someone with such a high degree of brain rot that they cannot even form a logical viewpoint. It’s hard to argue with someone smart, but impossible to argue with an idiot. You legitimately think all women are equally desired by any man because they have vaginas? Delusion. Pretty privilege doesn’t exist? Delusion. No men have standards and will put their dick in any woman given the chance? Delusion. Saying young 18 y/o guys are alwa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:16 AM
1

Everyone has “personal negativity” they go through, whether it’s periods of depression, anxiety, struggles, or stress etc. Expressing those issues is exactly what being vulnerable means, it’s not about sharing all the great things that happen to you. I’m not saying this guy was constantly negative for no reason, but he struggles with anxiety and stress and would share about these things frequently. How do you determine if your vulnerability is a vice or a virtue? It’s completely subjective. Some…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 02:07 AM
1

You’re actually wrong. Yes on a core level, everybody understands that you need to work out to look good, and if you’re charming you’re more likely to attract the opposite gender. This is common sense. The difference is that RP emphasizes these things while explaining some harsh truths that blue pillers would never say or understand. Perfect example: I was at a dinner with some coworkers last night. One of my coworkers is going through a divorce, through no decision of his own… he’s beyond devas…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 02:21 AM
1

Sounds like you haven’t spent much time outside your moms basement. Youth and looks is definitely not where men’s SMV comes from, unlike women. As I’ve gotten older, made more money, and got better at “game,” I’ve had much more success with women. This completely invalidates your statement. Not to mention men pay thousands for the consumption of feminine beauty, whereas girls do not. All the top onlyfans creators are women… if girls were mostly attracted to looks in the opposite sex then this di…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:48 AM
1

I’m pretty sure anyone with a brain could agree that women are objectively more physically attractive. There’s a reason why girls can gain hundreds of thousands of followers on social media for just posting selfies, and make six figure salaries just by selling feet pics… But in terms of overall “attractiveness” to the opposite sex, it’s illogical to compare the men and women. Women are attracted to different things in men, and physical appearance is just a small factor. To say women are more att…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:38 AM
2

Because the main thing all men want is sex and every woman has a pussy… they don’t have a long laundry list of requirements to get with someone like you have lol. It’s really not hard to understand
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:26 AM
3

RP isn’t about shaming women for their preferences. It’s about understanding them and adapting. I’d consider myself RP and I accept the way the world works. Hell, if I was a girl, especially a hot one, I’d have really high standards as well. There is this phenomenon called “RP Rage” which is more of what you’re talking about. That’s when you realize the truths of RP and then get super mad about it. That’s usually when you get the guys complaining about women and their dating preferences. It’s no…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:24 AM
0

The thing that you’re not realizing is that men and women have different “mating strategies” so to speak. A woman generally wants someone who they can develop something long term with; someone who can support them emotionally and can provide in terms of lifestyle, fun moments, financial stability etc. Men on the other hand, mainly just want to f#%k. Our balls create millions of sperm everyday and there’s a strong urge to release… if you don’t release it then things start to get uncomfortable and…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter