TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

catmoon Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by catmoon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I was summarizing her argument, not my own.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:32 PM
11

I am now fascinated by you. The hostility and wild inaccuracy of your statements makes you so compelling to me. You know nothing about me and have admitted to not even reading my comment. So far you have me pinned down as a public sector sociologist, presumably a black female? Let's see how close you can get to describing me.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:04 PM
9

It saddens me what is considered a "wall of text" these days. It's less than 20 sentences. Read it, or don't. That's entirely up to you. EDIT: I just read your other comment. Here is your logical path. 1) long comment IMPLIES sociology major. 2) Sociology majors IMPLIES poor at analysis. I hope that kind of logic isn't what passes for "good analysis." Also, I have no interest in working for you anyway.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:45 PM
36

Let me first say that I only come to subreddits such as /r/Libertarian and /r/MensRights in order to have my views challenged and I'm often the lonely guy playing devil's advocate, but I find myself agreeing with you guys in this case. There are legitimate sociological discussions to have. Our society does not treat men and women equally -- this is something that we can all agree on -- and it follows logically that men and women will behave differently as a result and will be treated differently…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:01 PM
4

For low-margin consumer goods, customer satisfaction has marginal effects. Pricing is God in these markets. Amazon used to offer a really unique service but as competitors start to pile up behind it, they're going to find themselves trying to maintain the status quo. The same but worse will happen to Groupon which has no laurels to sit on.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:35 PM
2

Really? I see online book purchases as a nearly saturated market. For saturated markets all that really matters is market share. Traditionally, for consumer goods that's a fight to the bottom. If B&N becomes comparable in price, Amazon will see that their customers aren't really very loyal.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:37 PM
10

Barnes and Noble will stay relevant longer than that. The Nook, while not iPad successful, has helped them weather the storm and is a good platform for them to transition into more digital publications. Their brick and mortar stores may be doomed like you say but B&N will limp along as a company so long as they (1) make purchasing of physical books online competitive with Amazon and (2) continue to develop their ereader product line.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 04:00 PM
1

About 25% of women in the US reportedly have experienced sexual harassment [1]. Among active service women that figure is about 34% [2]. It varies from year to year, but is generally higher for military women than the general public.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 10:45 AM
0

What are my views and how are they incorrect?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 10:23 PM
-3

You argue with great perspicacity. How could I ever match such profound intellect.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 09:38 PM
-1

I await your rebuke on tenterhooks.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 09:28 PM
6

I remember back before the 4chanification of Reddit when phrases like "concern troll" and "butthurt" were considered low brow and anti-intellectual. Now it's just par for the course.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 09:18 PM
-4

If introducing women removes efficiency, stability, or capability, then you have to ask this question of ethics: how many of our soldiers' lives is equality worth? I think there's a point in comment threads like this where if you adequately delve into a debate you eventually arrive at some philosophical crossroads. We're at the classic Kantian vs. Utilitarian debate, motive vs. results. I can't tell you what's the right answer. I have never personally subscribed to utilitarianism because that's …
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:52 PM
-5

Because what's at stake isn't a bottom line, or a possible economic failing. I don't think our security is worth turning our back on ethical behavior. This is the same horrible justification used for all kinds of stupid US policy. The military is NOT an equality opportunity land to be balanced. Why shouldn't it be? Are women not equal stakeholders in US security? NOTE: I would respond quicker but the downvotes get me caught by the comment limiter.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:29 PM
-6

How do you consider the military different from any other potentially hazardous career opportunity? And how does my employment as an engineer affect this tangential argument that's being made?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:16 PM
-5

No I'm a product engineer. How does my lack of military service affect the validity of anything I said. Please be specific.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:57 PM
-8

Pregnant service women do not automatically get leave. I believe they are generally required to perform their regular tasks and are given the option to resign. One allowance they get is that they must be stationed within 6 hours of medical care during their pregnancy so they aren't often sent to FOBs. The official recommendation is that they learn to plan their pregnancies with their scheduled leave.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:21 PM
-15

Using the military as an example for how men have it worse than women is like showing successful business men at work while their stay-at-home wives do domestic chores. See how hard the man has to work to provide for his lazy pampered wife? The military is actually a great opportunity for many people and it's one that is not equally available to all genders. It took until the year 2012 before we even permitted openly gay soldiers. Women, while allowed to participate, often have their careers stu…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:58 PM
14

Reddit is actually designed for this kind of thing. Similar to Twitter you can add ".json" to the end of a Reddit URL and obtain a wealth of well-formatted information about the comments without wasting as much bandwidth. Here's an example of the JSON file for this thread (note the URL): http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ius8y/ragainstmensrights_has_posted_a_text_dump_of_a.json If any of you are interested in learning more, please review the rules. The admins have asked that you not ma…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 02:02 PM
1

In this cas⒠, th⒠ woman is planning on having th⒠ child so sh⒠'s not shirking r⒠sponsibility at all. I b⒠li⒠v⒠ what you'r⒠ trying to say is (and corr⒠ct m⒠ if I'm wrong): if a woman und⒠rstands that a man has no wish to hav⒠ a child, sh⒠ should b⒠ r⒠ady to acc⒠pt th⒠ possibility of raising a child on h⒠r own. W⒠ll, I just don't agr⒠⒠ with that s⒠ntim⒠nt but I gu⒠ss w⒠'ll just hav⒠ to disagr⒠⒠.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 03:56 AM
1

Both ar⒠ fin⒠ with m⒠ but, sinc⒠ it's immoral to forc⒠ a woman to hav⒠ an abortion or to giv⒠ away h⒠r child for adoption, th⒠ only quəstion r⒠maining is wh⒠th⒠r or not th⒠ fath⒠r should b⒠ ⒠xp⒠ct⒠d to support th⒠ child. Sinc⒠ h⒠ is partially r⒠sponsibl⒠ for th⒠ child ⒠v⒠r coming into ⒠xistanc⒠, I think that it is a r⒠asonabl⒠ ⒠xp⒠ctation. Also, I apologiz⒠ if this comm⒠nt was difficult to r⒠ad.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 03:21 AM
1

She does. I think they should both be responsible for the child.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 02:35 PM
-4

How did he not choose this? Just because he now doesn't want it doesn't mean that his intentional action didn't lead to this. He had unprotected sex. That is by far the best way to get someone pregnant. If I had to come up with 10 ways to get someone pregnant I would start with unprotected sex.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:26 AM
-1

...he is being discriminated agianst because his wishes are not being respected Well I "wish" my student loans would disappear. I'm being discriminated against by my Sallie Mae because they wont clear my debt. I took out the loans because I liked money and I don't like the restrictions of Federal subsidies (you can hardly feel the money at all) so I got a high interest private loan. Now they want me to pay them back?! What nerve! Why are my "wishes" being ignored!
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:13 AM
-1

Are you saying that a woman is equally responsible for pregnancy caused by rape as a man is for pregnancy caused by consensual unprotected sex?
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:54 AM
0

I keep hearing this argument and I think I must not be understanding it correctly. In order for a woman to give up their child for adoption doesn't the father have to have already abandoned the child? Couldn't the father similarly assume custody of the child and request child support from the mother if she decides that she doesn't want it. (I'm aware that child support cases are rarely judged fairly but in theory isn't this how it works?)
/r/MensRights28/03/11 11:53 PM
-6

In some cases I'll agree that the system is discriminatory against men since they are often forced to pay child support beyond their means and aren't allowed equal custody of their children. I don't believe this is one of those cases. Allowing a parent to decide to raise a child in a traditional manner and to expect some support from the other parent is perfectly ethical. The fact that mothers are allowed to give away a child for adoption is meant to protect children, not the mother. I believe t…
/r/MensRights28/03/11 11:03 PM
-2

As many people have already said, she can choose to give up the baby to let someone else take care of the child or have an abortion. Right, she can choose to do any of those things but the OP's brother has no right to demand that she get an abortion and he should have to share equal responsibility for the child that is born. I really do feel bad for him because he made a huge mistake and will pay dearly for it but this is a simple case of personal accountability.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 10:12 PM
-4

It does make her responsible and there is absolutely no way for her to avoid accepting responsibility at this point. The easiest out she has is to have surgery performed.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:58 PM
-7

This pregnancy thing is a turn-based game. The OP's brother had his opportunity to prevent a pregnancy with nearly 100% effectiveness but he chose not to.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:55 PM
-10

Yes, of course. Is she neglecting her responsibility by choosing to care for the child?
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:53 PM
-9

He could have had all the sex he wanted but he chose to have sex without a condom. He's made his bed now.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:50 PM
5

The moral of the story is: "make sure you're on the same page with someone about parenthood when having unprotected sex or suffer the consequences."
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:44 PM
-7

They are both clearly responsible but it is naive to think that the OP's brother should be able to simply absolve himself of all culpability after the fact. I firmly believe that everyone is the sole custodian of their bodies. His opportunity to protect his interests was a month ago when they had sex and he decided to opt out. Now the ball is in her court.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:37 PM
-2

Having sex with the girl without a condom makes him responsible. Willful negligence does not eliminate all liability. It's not as though this was an accident or some sort of trickery. If I crash into someone's car, I don't get to force them to scrap the car although I can negotiate the rate. The OP's brother was driving around in a death trap with no insurance and is acting like the victim when he is entirely at fault.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter