TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

catratdog Archive

View 3 posts and 118 comments by catratdog on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

I started to assume that atheists=smart people. Big mistake. Atheists are at least as dumb and obnoxious as religious people. In fact in my experience they are much more obnoxious. Bill Maher is actually a perfect example.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:43 AM
1

we are becoming a mixed community of incels. Speak for yourself? Not sure where that came from.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:41 AM
3

OKay. That's it. We have sunk to the very bottom of the vilest, darkest snake pit known to man. Vice is a tool of the Devil. I'm willing to support Pat Robertson on this. He may have gotten the whole gay earthquake thing wrong but hey, nobody's perfect. Who's to say that gays and lesbians HAVEN'T caused earthquakes? Does anyone actually "know" anything? So yeah, instead of a "march on Vice," why not just stop clicking on them? That would seem to be the easiest solution. Use Archive.org or whatev…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:41 AM
1

Gee what a shock.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:23 AM
-1

Fuck Maher. He's a putz. You said it yourself: "He says he's a supporter of #MeToo, but only to a point." What's the problem? Let him rot. He's a douchebag.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:21 AM
1

It would be extremely easy to help homeless men. But we don't.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:05 AM
2

I absolutely love the "Orville." It's awesome.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:50 PM
1

Bitch.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:48 PM
1

Fine. But you didn't produce a single coherent question, at least not one without venom. You can't attack someone and expect them to be nice.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:47 PM
2

I feel really bad about that previous post. I feel like that guy in that dolphin documentary movie that admitted "this is the worst thing I've ever done," about stealing Orca babies. Well, I've never stolen Orca babies but I was clearly a cunt in this conversation with the Trekkie guy, you, omega. Trekkies are in fact the future of the world, and should be honored. So I apologize /u/omegaphallic. I'm sorry. Star Trek is awesome. Yes I do personally prefer the "Orville," but that may be because I…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:42 PM
3

Well, who am I? I'm just some guy on the Internet. If a Trek fan enjoys Star Trek, I would have to be the meanest person in the world to deny you your joy. But yeah the new Star Trek TV series sucks ass. Sorry. The Orville is better. I think what's his face who created Orville is honoring Star Trek, while the actual "Star Trek" on TV is complete dogshit.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:25 PM
3

I said, GOOD DAY, sir. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Guthrie_guitar_this_machine_kills_fascists.jpg
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:21 PM
6

I'm not an asshole. I'm just brusque. And forgive me for thinking that homeless people should have guns. Apparently this makes me an awful person. Yes, I believe that homeless people should have guns, including automatic weapons, grenades, helicopters etc; apparently this makes me a bad person. Well, I say to you -- GOOD DAY sir.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:15 PM
1

Learn how to say goodbye...bye.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:11 PM
2

The fact that we great and hug all dogs Well maybe we can end on a positive note. I too think dogs are awesome. Where would we be without dogs? There's actually a whole school of anthropology devoted to the idea that dogs aided in human evolution. So -- dogs rock, we agree.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:05 PM
8

Son, don't follow me around and make little snipes on other threads. That's just sad. If you want to challenge my arguments, do so. Don't be a passive-aggressive little bitch.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:01 PM
1

Look kid, you're just not very bright, and I'm not sure what else to say. Good luck in your studies or whatever.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:56 PM
4

OP has 100 upvotes. So apparently everyone is an idiot except you. Or, you know, you are in fact an idiot. Gee, I wonder which hypothesis is true? lol
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:50 PM
8

They're clearly very disturbed people. I mean, imagine taking time out of your life to oppose some group of other people achieving equal rights. It sends shivers down my spine.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:47 PM
1

Is that supposed to be cute? You fail, child.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:44 PM
5

You're simply too dim to understand what I'm talking about. Bye :)
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:42 PM
4

Well, to be frank, I don't think the conservatives are any better than the liberals or NDP or whatever. You live in the UK? So you know what I'm talking about. The current UK government is feminist in all but name. Not even the bloody Conservatives will stand up to feminism. I think most people have both "left" and "right" wing views depending on the issue (for example -- I'm 'left' on economics, but I fully support gun rights). But it's very easy and convenient for billionaires to divide everyt…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:39 PM
9

Yeah it's all very predictable. Feminists could solve the "problem" of the MRM overnight; but there's a lot of cash to be made. So we have endless, stupid articles claiming that MRA's do this that and the other thing. Typically they quote far right wing websites like Return of Kings. It's just...pathetic. To reiterate, it would be very, very easy for feminists to solve the "problem" of men's rights -- they could just talk to us. That's it.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:27 PM
9

Rest assured most of us don't buy into this madness. It's an entirely top down affair -- and frankly the same bullshit is coming from American elites. Your average Canuck is like, "fuck off and put on the hockey," that's about it.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:21 PM
1

Sure, if you have the mental age of a four-year-old combined with overall degeneracy.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:17 PM
11

I think it likely that some of the people on that sub were molested by their fathers or something. They hate men and boys, and most of their comments are just sad. I won't say they are dangerous and want to harm boys, but who knows. They are clearly sick.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:14 PM
13

Well, I received an A in English Literature and a C in English. Can you guess the difference? One teacher was a feminist. It is a fact that feminists mark down boys. I don't know whether that's true in your case, but back up your work, and take it to a third party.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:04 PM
48

That place is sinister, it's like a sub for pedophiles. Truly evil folk. I recommend not engaging them. Some people hate men and boys. That's just the way it is.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:59 PM
1

Still, I married a feminist I am shocked -- shocked at this development. One question: are you a woman or a man? I'm leaning 99 percent toward woman.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:52 PM
4

It's unfortunate that you're being downvoted, because you are essentially correct. Whether feminists like it or not, men need a purpose in life. Men need a role for themselves. Perhaps that role will be "FATHER", but feminists need to support shared parenting. Right now, men are stuck in limbo. That isn't healthy.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:27 PM
1

That's really interesting. Can you point me to an article about this?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:19 PM
2

Canadians -- make sure to tell the NDP why you will never vote for them again. I can't stress this enough. If you just vote for /other party/, they'll never know WHY you switched your vote. It is theoretically possible, and in fact this has happened a few times in history, that a political party will alter their position.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:11 PM
1

Is that true? What kind of animal? Anyway, we DO know that both men and women prefer to save women from imminent death.... Yeah, they even did a study. The vast majority of women, and a slight majority of men, would prefer to see men "thrown off a bridge" rather than women. There you have it, my fellow men. The future is grim...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:46 PM
1

I was "laid" only three hours ago. Granted it wasn't that great. Here is a photograph featuring workers from 1933: http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-mexican-labor-strike-1933-nmexican-workers-on-strike-in-california-95793734.html Note that the sign says, "Disarm the rich farmer OR Arm the workers for self defense." Now that was during the great depression. Tell me, kid, whether you think those starving workers were wrong, and "need to get laid", you asshole.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:26 PM
1

I honestly don't even know where you're coming from. Do you think homeless people shouldn't have guns? In a country full of gun owners? That's pretty fucking elitist my friend. I dare say you are being classicist. "Noooooo, those wretches shouldn't have guns, not like me and my rich friends*. Yeah.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:18 PM
0

I don't know what that means. Does arming the homeless work for me? Well I don't think it's a terrible idea, it's a cry for help, since our beloved capitalist governments have so far failed to help the homeless. It could theoretically be a terrible idea, but we haven't tried it yet.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:09 PM
0

So...I take it you don't want to arm the homeless. I posed an honest question, and you act like a petulant child. You're like a little girl who screams in hysteria over a doll, you're pathetic.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:53 PM
2

One of the great things about Star Trek: The Next Generation is that its creators apparently didn't feel the need to have constant action/explosions etc. And that made it much more interesting. They were so relaxed, in fact, that they made some truly harebrained episodes, like the one where the entire crew "devolves" into a bunch of animals. That was hilarious, but you couldn't have it on the current "Star Trek" because it's oh so serious. This isn't Ingmar Bergman you idiots, it's Star Trek! Th…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:50 PM
-3

No I think they are "sane." "Sane" in quotation marks. Because cats and dogs are cute as fuck, whereas some guy who hasn't shaved or bathed in six months is rather...rough around the edges; and besides, shouldn't he be taking on the world and conquering things despite the fact that he is schizophrenic? That's what a man should be doing, not begging for coins. Begging for Christ's sake. Man up and pull yourself up by your boot straps, soldier!
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:21 PM
1

lol. Well, good day sir. And just for fun, here's a clip of a woman stroking a tiger, from Michael Mann's film "Manhunter": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y07Z8YVbjbs
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:06 PM
2

As fun as that is, I still prefer the Tiger.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:56 PM
3

No, no I wouldn't. Good day to you mam/sir.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:45 PM
3

No. But it sounds like a fun job.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:20 PM
2

Thank you. I thought that was a nice touch.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:20 PM
3

How many children do you know get mauled to death by cats? All too many men, in India, get killed by tigers every year. There is an interesting dispute between people who want "tiger conservation" and people who want "average Indian guy who lives in the region and doesn't want to be mauled to death" conservation. If you're talking about the West, there is absolutely no contest: dogs are responsible for the overwhelming majority of "animal-on-man" attacks, including fatalities, and including chil…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:55 PM
5

Is it avoidable? Think real hard you retarded piece of shit, and then answer.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:28 PM
5

Your average, average-sized dog can certainly kill any "housecat" -- if the dog's master gives him permission. Cats have no master; that's part of their devilish charm. It's sorta funny to see dogs being completely dominated by cats in your average household. The cat is clearly the "alpha" in nine out of ten house-hold arrangements, even though the dog could kill the cat easily. I actually feel sorry for dogs who live in houses with cats. Cats don't have human-like emotions like dogs; cats are j…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:25 PM
4

That wouldn't surprise me at all, and they are justified in doing so...So long as they don't hurt anyone.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:16 PM
1

The movie itself was adapted from the book Roadside Picnic. I didn't know that. The more you learn...Thank you.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:14 PM
13

Nevertheless, it remains illegal to mutilate puppies but legal to mutilate baby boys. My anger was justified, even if my comment about Jews was unjustified.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:01 PM
5

Sorry, I forgot the /s ;) Edit: when I used the phrase "daily dose," implying a drug, that should have been sufficient.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:43 PM
2

STALKER is a series of amazing first-person shooter games where you try to survive in the Zone, the evacuated area around Chernobyl after the '86 nuclear incident. I'm guessing the name was taken from Russian filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky's brilliant film of the same name/theme, "Stalker". Unless you enjoy slow/art house type films I wouldn't recommend it; still, the imagery is absolutely beautiful. Beyond films and video games, I'd be really interested in hearing about actual wild dogs. They do ex…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:42 PM
3

Homeless men or cats or dogs? The truth is that NONE of them are "scum." Every living being is just trying to get by... You average homeless man -- if he wanted to -- could become a psycho murderer nutcase. But he doesn't. So show some respect.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:33 PM
-2

What is "STALKER" and more importantly, what is a "km"? Remember that not everyone here is a fancy pance Canadian or European or Russian using the "metric" system. Some of us like our good ol' fashion miles and cheeseburgers (with American cheese).
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:28 PM
1

Are there actually wild dog packs in Russia? Because the only video I've seen about "wild dog packs" supposedly took place in Russia. It was about a cop pulling someone over for speeding, in the winter, and then this huge wild dog pack came running by. In the dogs' defense, they could have easily killed and eaten the two men but didn't. They just kept on runnin...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:18 PM
3

Dogs have very human emotions and will attempt to disguise an act of "wrongdoing." Cats? Yeah you're right about cats, they don't give a fuck and wouldn't bother to lie in the first place. There's a quote that goes something like, If a cat could talk, he wouldn't. I think that amongst humans, homeless men probably deserve more sympathy than average. Most homeless men suffer from mental illness.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:02 PM
1

The brilliant Norm MacDonald on homeless dogs. I probably should have started with this video.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:58 PM
1

I get your point. The act of molding a statue requires intent. I was using said act as an analogy. Yes, both males and females create "the next generation" through the process of sexual selection. Strangely, humans tend to ignore the female half of the equation when they examine male behavior...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:52 PM
30

You're right, I got overly emotional. There's actually a rapidly growing organization called Jews against circumcision. How absurd is it to believe that God wants you to mutilate a boy's genitals? It's so ridiculous, and so obscene, that I sometimes get angry.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:47 PM
1

You may not like what you find there....
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:44 PM
2

Indeed. Though some homeless men might welcome three meals a day, even if they have to live in a cage. There was a case in the US where a man robbed a bank (without an actual gun) so he could get food and healthcare. I wasn't meaning to pick on Russia; it's just that the only video I've seen of a wild dog pack came from...Russia.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:40 PM
11

Well I was a tad bold in that proclamation -- because I didn't even watch the original Star Trek -- but me and my dad would watch Star Trek The Next Generation every week, so I feel qualified to shit on that douche bag Abrams. He tried to turn Star Trek into some pop bubble gum nonsense, when it was supposed to be about ideas and indeed humanity transcending violence. That's why I think Trek fans are right when they dismiss Abrams (and the latest, dumbass series) as nonsense. The Orville is fun …
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:30 PM
2

What about dog's shelters?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:20 PM
2

Fuck you bot. Like most people I enjoyed the Big Lebowski, but I don't want fucking robots trying to simulate wit.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:08 PM
3

This is David vs Goliath. I can't help but think he will lose simply because he lacks several billion dollars. Or the fucking lawyers will draw it out for years if not decades. Am I wrong?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:05 PM
-9

What about the dog's penis? Sorry to be blunt but I'm curious....You're saying it's illegal to maim a dog but not a baby human boy? Edit: some Jew downvoted me. Well congrats, hundreds of baby boys die from the "procedure" every year. That should weigh on your conscience in a big, big way, you piece of shit.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:56 PM
13

If you are someone who feels threatened by women OKay. No man, anywhere, ever, has been "threatened by women" in the manner he is implying. However every man understands that a single woman can wield the power of the state. In other words, if some crazy broad accuses you of x, y and z, "stormtroopers" may be on the horizon.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:53 PM
33

Hahaha what a goof. Abrams is a putz who should, at minimum, never be allowed anywhere near a franchise ever again. Think that's too harsh? Well he trashed Star Trek, and the TV Star Trek was awesome.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:48 PM
-3

The BBC is a highly reputable news organization. I only surf BBC and CNN for MY daily dose of news.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:30 PM
1

Then you must hate the British Broadcasting Corporation, which is full of over-sized black cocks. Just don't venture into room 101...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:29 PM
2

If you're a fan of old Western movies you'll remember a steely eyed Clint Eastwood saying something like, "hit that dog again" and I'll mess you up. I don't remember the exact film. Dogs are joyous, wonderful creatures, a million times more loyal than your average man. So we all sympathized with Clint, and dogs. What about cats? Well cats are obviously superior to dogs, or at least they think so. Cats are arrogant, haughty, superior predators but they did perform an important historical function…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:56 PM
119

Honest question: do we, as society, value dogs more than men? I understand that dog shelters are not just for protecting dogs -- wild dog packs are a fucking menace to society. Look at Russia. But I can't help but think that we really do value those doe-eyed, eternally loyal beasts more than men. And don't get me started on cats -- those adorable purring murder beasts. It's an honest question. Do we -- as a society -- care more about cats and dogs than men? I think the answer is "yes". It's not …
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:07 PM
31

Well, Chris has a lot of money. It's pretty rare for people with lots of money to commit social suicide. Even if they are comedians. Unfortunately, standing up for men and boys is now considered demode. If you want to make money, invest in Black Panther.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:58 AM
-5

Sorry, I accidentally down-voted you. In point of fact I agree.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:55 AM
-10

Jordan Peterson will KILL YOU.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:53 AM
1

women were considered to be more aligned with storms and weather than agents. They were considered amoral creatures and thus bore no responsibility for their actions, like a pet. That's very interesting, and goes again to the heart of the matter: men are considered agents/adults, women are considered damsels in distress -- even though women arguably have more power than men on some levels. This was a lesser problem before men invented birth control and time-saving devices in the home; now, it's …
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:06 AM
6

as long as they don't infringe on the rights of other groups. As soon as such a group comes into existence, I'll be glad to support it. But we're dealing with reality here.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:35 AM
12

At what rate are black women incarcerated compared to black men? And before you say, "well, black men commit more crimes," a study in the UK determined that if females were treated like males in the criminal justice system there would be rough parity in the prison population. As it is, due to gynocentrism, the vast majority of the prison population is male. If every woman who hit her child was charged with assault, I reckon that there would be more female than male prisoners. Black men get the d…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:32 AM
1

Your claims have already been dissected here.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:20 AM
10

internalized belief of yours I think it would be great if the opposite were true. Men would be lining up at the library rather than the gym. I mean do you think men like realizing that dominance (which may or may not include physical violence) is an important factor in female attraction? I certainly didn't relish learning about this, and I've been married for 20 years. But I can't deny what is already obvious, and I think you're engaging in some pretty wild wishful thinking. In truth, if we want…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 09:56 PM
14

It's only your little subculture that believes women want dominant males. No you're right. That's why attractive women seek out poor but sensitive and kindly men, and poor men seek out powerful but physically unattractive women like Madeleine Albright. It all makes sense now! Hmmm..who am I to believe? You or objective reality? I'm willing to concede that in non-hierarchical egalitarian societies ie among nomadic foragers that [edit: would be] dominant males are condemned and socially stigmatize…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:38 PM
7

Yeah, nevermind "boys night out", the "boys are back in down", "just me and the boys," etc. Feminists are so fucking retarded. It's like they lay awake at night trying to think up new non-issues to nag men about. They're the institutional equivalent of an abusive wife.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:22 PM
2

Reminds me of this scene with Ed Asner from Curb your Enthusiasm
/r/MensRights16/02/18 05:54 PM
9

Some people simply dislike his far right wing political views. I agree with him on feminism and PC culture but that's about it.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:46 PM
13

Given that the vast majority of men who have fought in front line combat roles throughout history have done so against their will or as a sacrifice for others, that doesn't seem like much of a "right." Also, I'll be UN-PC and state the truth: women are not equally willing nor they are equally able. There may be a freakish exception or two but that's what they are -- exceptions; and the mere presence of females in male dominated groups alters the dynamic and increases intra-group competition at t…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:02 PM
42

Men also select women. Right. They typically select for youth, physical beauty and agreeability. They don't select for dominance over others. to imply a conscious decision I never claimed these decisions were/are conscious in the sense of some eugenics experiment.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:51 PM
3

There isn't any, come to think of it. I'll edit the post.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:46 PM
18

we need to find a way to communicate with each other. Women need to grow up, is all. My sister is a (married) physician and was sexually propositioned at work by a fellow doctor. She let it go the first time. When it happened again she told him in no uncertain terms to knock it off. Wouldn't you know it? He stopped immediately and has never bothered her again. Notice what she did here: she didn't act like a child. She didn't run to the boss or HR or the media and tattle tail, which could have re…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:33 PM
10

Men are instinctually attracted to young women. Criticizing them for this is no different than criticizing gay men for being attracted to men. Speaking of gay men, why don't feminists criticize Ian McKellin for chasing "twinks"? We all why: because this isn't about "power differentials" (young women actually have sexual power OVER men, including older ones), it's about older women trying to make it socially unacceptable to date their younger competitors.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:19 PM
88

Also, if we are going to get picky and point fingers, we could also look into what type of men women select for mating and what the responsibility of women is for picking and genetically reproduce daring and adventurous men over more calm and boring ones. This is a really interesting point. Females have, through millions of years of sexual selection, molded males into what they are. Like a sculptor molding a statue out of clay. Moreover, if feminists want men to stop seeking dominance over other…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:12 PM
2

Well, the most important thing is often the balls, and you had/have them. Good luck :)
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:49 PM
10

Bozek said the campaign isn’t worried about “these ego-driven, tired old men.” Misandry on the right, misandry on the left, misandry in the center.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 09:48 PM
11

The claim that "white men can't be discriminated against" is itself an example of discrimination against white men.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:48 PM
3

Not everything is a political power struggle. Then there should be no need to get the state involved. You're recommending that people introduce a political power arrangement into a loving relationship. That's nutso. It made sense in the 19th century but it makes zero sense in today's climate.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:27 PM
5

Sounds kinda like Except one is an example of services provided to women, while the other is an example of legal discrimination against men. If you're comfortable giving a woman complete power over you that's fine, but it's not something I'd recommend to most men.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:22 PM
6

I'm sure you have a happy marriage. Good for you. But advising other men to enter a situation in which they are at constant risk of having their lives destroyed is irresponsible. And I fail to see why it's necessary in the first place. If two people love each other there is no reason to get the state involved. If anything, creating that sort of severe power imbalance could make an otherwise healthy relationship become toxic. You're also ignoring the fact that people change. My cousin married a s…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:07 PM
17

Lying sack of shit. And this bitch doesn't even have the integrity to make her identity publicly known.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:04 PM
3

Sometimes I think all the MRM needs to really kick off and rapidly grow in numbers is for people to feel as if they've been given permission. I agree. It's easy to forget that only a small minority identify as feminist because the media is constantly pushing "women's oppression" down our throats. The Red Pill documentary is a good way of introducing the issues to friends and family. I've also noticed that positive discussion of men's rights has increased dramatically in the past few years, at le…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:02 PM
4

That's rather petty of you. Anyway, I acknowledge their pain. The question is what is actually going to help them. I believed what I said when I implied that girlfriends are overrated. Just look at the horror stories on the MGTOW board. And if you can't get sex through dates just hire an escort. I don't think engaging in endless self-pity and misogyny is helpful, I think it will just make them more depressed. I do not believed that incels should be mocked, incidentally. They should be shown comp…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:55 PM
10

Well I applaud you for having the balls to take on the issue. Good for you. I thought you mumbled a little bit and were a bit rushed, but I'm not one to talk as I suck at public speaking. On the issues: the gender sentencing gap is not entirely the fault of feminists. They have done nothing to correct it, but people were complaining about women literally getting away with murder in the early 20th century. However it was effective in highlighting their failure to pursue actual gender equality. Yo…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:48 PM
6

For men, marriage is now equivalent to the Sword of Democles. At any moment, the woman can drop the sword and destroy your life. There is simply no point unless you have an affinity for high stakes gambling or masochism.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:23 PM
3

I fail to see why getting the state involved in a relationship is necessary or desirable in this day and age.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:19 PM
8

Another obvious problem is that being a "sexual assault survivor" is now fashionable. Women receive tons of support and sympathy and even celebrity by "raising their voices" against the evil patriarchs. So it would be very easy to imagine multiple women "coming forward" after an initial false accusation.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:07 PM
13

He seems to have a low tolerance for bullshit. Also helps that he has enough money to never have to work again.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:43 PM
7

That's just awful.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:07 PM
4

some of their core philosophies are not horrible ( or at least, they didn't used to be. I haven't checked it out in a while now ). Build up your body, build up your confidence. Not horrible things to pursue. Yeah, I have no problem with the self-improvement stuff.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:06 PM
7

Great additions. It's abundantly clear at this point that feminists are unconcerned with facts and logic. But they are surely concerned with social status. Hence the constant virtue signaling. Rather than trying to reason with them, it may be more effective to make them social outcasts. The goal should be to reduce feminists to the social equivalent of racists. And really, that's what they are -- the gender equivalent of racists.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:04 PM
23

There used to be "Eugenics studies" in every major University. Women's studies should go the same way. They are unscientific, ahistorical, counter-predictive, and above all hateful. It is absolutely crazy that primarily male tax dollars are helping to fund these hate factories. Either shut 'em down or force them to include counter-arguments rooted in science and objective reality.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:21 PM
-6

Well, because, mass deaths etc.,...
/r/MensRights13/02/18 10:00 PM
-3

Hundreds...of baby boys...die. Sorry, you appear to be on the right side of history. I'm sorry :)
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:47 PM
-4

So you want to mutilate baby boys. Hundreds die from the "procedure" every year. What do you have to say for yourself?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:32 PM
-5

You got owned. It's not hard.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:31 PM
2

My pleasure :)
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:03 PM
2

Looks like it has been deleted?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 08:23 PM
14

Men also evolved better making up skills. Combine that with the fact that Queens historically initiated more wars than Kings and the feminist claim that "patriarchy" is responsible for war and conflict becomes profoundly dubious.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:26 PM
13

Men are also highly cooperative. Just as female competition is often overlooked, so is male cooperativeness. Our competition occurs against an overarching backdrop of of cooperation.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:52 PM
5

Some people regard this guy as one of the greatest living filmmakers. Good on him for speaking out against the endemic misandry in our society.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:50 PM
54

Damnit. Title is misleading if it's merely a proposed ban. I'm no anti-semite but Jews will fight tooth and nail to prevent a precedent like this.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter