TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cave_hat Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by cave_hat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

Her: "I have a boyfriend" You: "I have a math test tomorrow" Her: "?" You: "Oh, I thought we were talking about things we're going to cheat on" Saw that on a youtube video.
/r/trpGAME24/08/14 02:18 AM
3

44%
/r/TRPOffTopic28/07/14 02:04 PM
1

I think you mixed up Feynman and Faraday. Faraday was the electromagnetism guy. Feynman was the nuclear/quantum mechanics guy.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 12:45 AM
1

She would only know if you gave her an unencrypted copy of your wallet. And even then she wouldn't be able to actually prove that those addresses belonged to you.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 08:19 PM
1

How would they know what address in the ledger was yours? Yeah, every transaction is public, but there is nothing connecting a person with a specific address. Most people would have a collection of addresses in one wallet. If you use a new address every time you receive bitcoins, then you can very easily hide the bulk of your money.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 06:40 PM
3

A Bitcoin wallet is really just the private keys that access a certain amount of bitcoins on the Bitcoin network. You can make as many copies of a wallet as you want and whoever has a copy can access those bitcoins. I suppose you could put one copy in a trust account and keep another copy if that were useful for some purpose. You're probably right about physical assets. It's hard to encrypt a house and cars.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 04:11 AM
3

Such a thing can't happen to Bitcoin. PIN accounts were still centralized with banks and so under the authority of governments. The government can pretty much force the banks to do what it wants them to do. There is, however, no centralized entity that the government can go after to regulate the holding and transfer of bitcoins. The best the government can do is regulate the flow of dollars into Bitcoin exchanges, but once you have bitcoins in your own wallet, then they are completely out the th…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 02:20 AM
1

How so? What is this PIN account you are referring to? Do you have a link to where I can get information on one of these PIN accounts?
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 10:11 PM
1

What do you mean by "completely exposed"? That's seems the opposite of what Bitcoin is.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:41 PM
1

You could just say that you lost your bitcoins or somebody hacked your computer or you forgot your password and nobody could prove otherwise, especially since those are all things that have happened in the past. And that's only necessary if you bought them in a way that leaves a record. There is no way of proving how many bitcoins you control.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:38 PM
2

How are those ways better? They sound far more complicated than using Bitcoin. How well are those accounts really protected in a divorce? The U.S. government is cracking down a bit on secret offshore accounts. There are services for women to find their husbands offshore accounts. Bitcoin is easier and gives you complete control of your money. It is relatively simple to protect your bitcoins against even the government. If you follow a few simple precautions, then the biggest danger is you forget…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 08:10 PM
4

This is actually considered to be one of the many uses for Bitcoin. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2646995/Divorcing-spouses-use-Bitcoin-hide-wealth-estranged-partners-court-battles.html
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 07:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter