TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cbmlmz Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by cbmlmz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Shareholders is a fair point. But a CEO making crazy amounts seriously wouldn't affect employees too much. Look at General Motors for instance. Fortune 500 company, the CEO makes approximately 28 mil. There's 216,000 direct employees. For the sake of the argument, let's say about 15% of that is management that makes a decent amount more than the average worker. dividing her salary amongst 180,000 people, they make a little less than $160 more a year each. Reducing that person's salary to help ou…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:56 PM
6

Irrelevant to the argument at hand. Slinging unrelated mud for outrage and sympathy points, almost exactly like the US debates. Good job, you should be proud.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:28 PM

Okay, he doesn't HAVE to earn more, but if he/she owns the company and is the reason that it began, he/she should see the fruits of his labor. Some people take it insanely far, to the point where it's morally questionable. If the CEO didn't start the company, then they (usually) did something to get to that position. They don't just hand out CEO positions to random schmucks. In either case, nobody should be able to decide that this person or that person makes too much money, as long as the means…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:26 PM
7

Yeah but those are overtly sexual. Hugh Mungus is just big.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 05:20 PM
5

All of us who have to deal with their bullshit?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/16 08:40 PM
11

Thanks!
/r/MensRights24/04/16 10:29 PM

My favorite quote, I heard it from Sargon but I don't recall who it is originally from: "If the world were to end tomorrow, the headline of the New York Times would read 'WORLD ENDS! WOMEN MOST AFFECTED"
/r/MensRights24/04/16 03:33 PM
3

It was made for a circus show IIRC. If not a circus show then some other form of entertainment. It was supposed to be a shock factor piece, something horrifying and disgusting. It was so shocking to people, and so little fact-checking capabilities when it was shown, that the misinformation spread and it just became a symbol for medieval torture. It wasn't created for actual torture, it was created to entertain people and "trick" them into thinking it was actually used.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:36 PM
1

As racist as it sounds, I'd prefer to call people what I want. I won't tell someone not to call me cracker. Or a Polack/JobRobber. Or a Dago/Greaser. I don't care to call someone any slur, but it actually being against the law is ridiculous. If your skin isn't thick enough to deal with a misguided and ignorant insult, why bother?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/15 02:38 PM
2

So what are the boundaries? Is it racism? Sexism? Religious affiliation? Is it okay if I say it in person? Can I take a video of it? What if a white person calls a black person "nigger", is it breaking the law? What if a black person calls a black person that? If a Black person calls a white man "cracker"? Or a man calls a woman "cunt"? What if someone says to a friend "Kill yourself" in a joking manner but he doesn't find it funny, but someone says it to a stranger with full intentions and they…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/15 11:08 AM
7

DIDN'T I JUST TELL YOU TO STOP MAKING UP ANIMALS?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/15 10:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter