TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cfcsvanberg Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by cfcsvanberg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Not just false accusations but she turned out to be the actual perpetrator. Otherwise I doubt anything would have happened to her. Johnny Depp brings in way more money to the studios than she could ever hope to do however, so for trying and somewhat succeeding to ruin his career she gets the axe.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 04:27 PM
3

Tell them that if that's all feminism is, they don't have to call themselves feminists and feel the need to defend feminism when the "extremists" do bad things. They can just call themselves egalitarians or human rights activists, and avoid that whole issue. If they persist, ask them why they would want to keep a label that has been tarnished by the bad behavior of those non-feminists. If they don't think feminism is anything beyond equal rights for women, they don't really need to be feminists.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 08:14 PM
3

I don't care for identity politics. Individuals can display toxic behavior, but I don't think femininity or masculinity are inherently toxic phenomena. They both seem like virtues to me.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 03:54 AM
3

Self-awareness isn't your strong suit, is it?
/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:25 PM
6

"Not able to think beyond idioms" says the religious person.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 05:28 AM
2

What do they mean "unearned"? Clearly these groups have earned any "privilege" (what they really mean is advantage) they might have by the success of their members, many of them for the explicit purpose of their offspring being able to enjoy the fruit of their labor.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:42 AM
4

It's pretty much a self-fulfilling prophecy: Feminists accuses anyone who opposes them of sexism/misogyny/bigotry. Opponents don't want to be thought of as bigots, since they are just regular people who want equality. Opponents yield, feminists gain power. Feminists keep calling normal people sexist/misogynist/bigots to gain even more power. It worked before! Namecalling have diminished returns. "No matter what I do you will call me sexist, I don't care anymore." More people start opposing femin…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:07 AM
5

He's Trumping it up, just saying whatever he likes, not caring if he wins or not (probably doesn't want to win) and just using the whole thing as a platform. He's never been more visible in mainstream media, and even if they lie and fuck with him, things like this will get out there.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:51 PM
1

Another response that might bring it closer to home for some of these people (but still won't make them understand why they are wrong): "I support equal rights, just not women's rights."
/r/MensRights23/03/19 01:21 AM
2

So, subjectively, women are objectively more attractive than men.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 04:55 PM
6

It makes sense. They only want women as customers because they can sell pink razors for women at a higher price. Because women will buy that shit.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:37 AM
2

No, that's double-think. Double-think is when you successfully hold two opposing viewpoints at the same time. Cognitive dissonance is when holding those viewpoints at the same time makes your brain hurt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
/r/MensRights05/01/19 12:47 AM
-1

Must resist fat joke.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:19 AM
5

If they are feminists, you can't. If they aren't, just say that.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 02:58 AM
1

Yeah, they are the same rights. In theory at least.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:57 PM
5

If they had sent in some men to cat-call these guys they might have seen the results they wanted. Maybe. The moral is that society hates men.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 11:07 PM
11

Prostitutes come in all kinds of price ranges. Unrelated to this article, I'm sure. Just saying.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:12 AM
4

She could call it "The Blue Pill".
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:04 PM
5

It is absolutely okay to refuse to shake hands with anyone for any reason, or no reason at all. You don't even have to reveal your reason.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 06:10 PM
7

It's not polite but it's still allowed. People can complain about whatever they want. Feminists complain about a lot of shit.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:45 PM
134

Actually, anyone is allowed to refuse to shake hands with anyone.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:18 AM
2

Who else would be eating glue and spit on his door?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:15 PM
3

That's when you say "fuck their religions".
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:56 AM
1

lol wut?
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:56 AM
5

Are these statistics actually correct or just politically correct?
/r/MensRights15/06/16 09:43 AM
1

Nicely put.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 03:25 PM
8

It's worse than that: they are claiming that feminists can't be sexist.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:14 PM
7

Why is it up to the men to prove they aren't the fathers (and pay for the tests)? Shouldn't the woman who is making the claim have to pay for the test?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:46 PM
2

Because some feminists believe that all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 11:46 PM
4

If only there was a way to simplify the emojis into a few lines, and then maybe assign sounds to these simplified emojis, so that they can be combined into longer strings which when pronounced would form entire words, that might help convey the message they were after. It must be easier to say "I'm getting a haircut" or "I'm working as a cop" than demanding personalized pictograms for every possible activity...
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:13 AM
1

If a female politician wore the same clothes to work every day for a year, the only people who would notice and comment on it would be other women.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:44 AM
4

If a female politician wore the same clothes to work every day for a year, the only people who would notice and comment on it would be other women.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:44 AM
3

Narcissism is getting out of hand. They need to be locked up for their own protection, and that of others.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:31 AM
5

So... autism is basically being manly?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:28 PM
1

I am talking about people who make personal attacks instead of arguing for their cause, ffs. People who have arguments and evidence for their cause don't need to use ad hominems to smear their opponents and shame them into silence.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 07:06 PM
1

Why? My comment applies to everyone who resorts to mudslinging. Not just feminists.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 04:55 PM
1

I confess I was generalising but in general when someone resorts to mudslinging they have no real argument. This goes for anyone who engages in ad hominem attacks, whether they are feminists or MRMs or whatever.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 08:51 AM
12

Because they have no real arguments or evidence to support their side of the argument, whatever that may be. So they have to resort to mudslinging.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:24 AM
2

"For the selective advancement of feminists." They don't care for women who aren't feminists.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:42 PM
3

It's actually something William S. Burroughs said.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:57 AM
10

They might have arrived at this method by trial and error, not by actually thinking about it. They just keep doing what gets them the most attention. Because deep down they are only driven by one thing: narcissism.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 06:05 PM
14

Not to mention that at least half the reason that they keep doing this must be because it cause a ton of attention which their little meetings would never get otherwise. Nobody cares about another anti-racism rally - almost everybody is already against racism, after all - so by telling people that white people and men of all colors aren't allowed, they get the attention that they would have got 40 years ago simply by protesting against racism. That they themselves are being racist is not a probl…
/r/MensRights23/04/15 05:54 PM
5

The police have arrested a black youth.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:28 PM
5

Yees... >.> Avoid... <.<
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:34 PM
3

The circular arguments just spin faster and faster.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:30 AM
1

No I don't want to push anyone away.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 10:06 AM
1

But they already think that no matter what.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:55 AM
3

Would you feel like it was the end of the world if it happened to you? Do you think that women who complain about it are really just bragging?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 01:52 PM
38

Interesting contrast to how feminists might have put it, if the roles were reversed. Obviously the man would have been to blame, not just for what he might have done, but for the entire system that puts him in jail for it. Wait, what?
/r/MensRights01/10/14 11:26 PM
1

Sommers is a feminist. That she dismisses the claims of other feminists regarding sexism in video games means a whole lot.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 11:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter