~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 17 y.o. woman who robbed kids at knife-point is punished with horsey lessonsSame article, only not Daily Mail The girl has breached her 9pm-7am curfew three times. She is due before Preston Crown Court next month. She is jointly charged with two other men with four counts of robbery, attempted robbery, receiving stolen goods and having a bladed article in Hancock Street, Blackburn, on February 28. The robbers made off with £1 and a school blazer in one incident and a Blackberry smartphone in another. The Lancashire Telegraph understands that the girl is not said by poli… | /r/MensRights | 04/06/11 03:57 PM |
| 1 | I'm Being Served and the Constable Threatened Me...It would make sense for an AG to go through the constable, not a process server. Either way, he's playing the same role, and has to adhere to similar rules, I would think. I meant constable, and not comptroller, in my previous post. Sorry about that. Doesn't matter who is trying to serve you, though. Serving notices is serving notices. As far as I understand, the only one who can hold you "contempt of court" would be the "court", meaning a judge. Good luck, though. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/11 08:15 AM |
| 3 | I'm Being Served and the Constable Threatened Me...Nope. He can't hold you in contempt for not accepting service, and I'd say he's definitely overstepping his authority. That said, lying isn't against the law; he's just an asshole. He is acting as a process server. His role is to serve you the papers however he can, and that's it. It probably wouldn't go anywhere, but if you'd like to make a complaint about him, you can do so here. He's tried three times, so he probably won't make another attempt, unless you're in Houston, where the requirement … | /r/MensRights | 05/05/11 06:13 AM |
| 1 | Do men have any privileges?2) People tend to assume a woman is more competent in all social fields than her male peer. Can you expand on this? | /r/MensRights | 11/12/10 01:49 PM |
| 1 | Reddit, we seem to have a misunderstanding about what feminism is.Although actually, 'feminism' is a nice catch-all way to blame women without the need to call them out directly (which of course most men will not do). Beautiful trolling. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 02:18 PM |
| 2 | This is an unacceptable way of treating your sonNo she won't. She'll deny she ever did such a thing, or write it off as "oh, it wasn't that bad. It's not like you had bruises!!!". These types don't have shame. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/10 02:27 AM |
| 4 | How would you interpret the following statement made by the wife to her husband.I was thinking the same thing. There's no context. Shitty economy has been on the forefront of lots of peoples' minds, lately. I know I projected I'd be making more than I am, right now. Anyway, if the conversation consisted of no more context than what was relayed, I would suggest just asking what was meant. And, since this is a marriage, maybe work on communication. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/10 10:38 AM |
| 1 | So I go to drop my daughter at school today and guess who is waiting for me in the parking lot ? A police officer...Hire a female private investigator to take the pics. I guarantee the cops will still get called, but they're used to it. Don't let the camera stop rolling, just because the cops are there, either. Record those conversations as well. If they're lodging complaints about possible pedos, then why are they continuing to allow those kids to be stuck out there unsupervised? Sounds like a good reason to change the policy, | /r/MensRights | 16/10/10 02:51 PM |
| 3 | My ex wife hit me with this today...any advice for a dad that might lose what little time he has with his daughter?Why would you not agree to mediation? These agreements are not legally binding, unless it goes to court. And the outcomes for both parties is usually a lot better than it is going to court. Isn't it better to have a win/win with both people making compromises, than a win/lose where someone gets fucked? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/10 12:27 PM |
| 1 | Last week my 22 floor office building had a fire alarm. We have fire drills every year so no one was concerned and everyone started down the stairs in an orderly way. Then we smelled smoke and heard sirens. The stairs were very packed and slow moving and many of the women started to panic...Trying to continue a discussion when the discussion has escalated to such an extreme (especially when there's this much irrationality involved) is pretty much impossible. We don't know that they didn't discuss this, in private, with the sexist culprits. If they haven't, they definitely SHOULD. We also don't know that there aren't plans to readdress, once people have calmed down. Shaming language should be called out on for the people who used it. 100% agree with that. Write their asses up, or fi… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/10 08:03 PM |
| 0 | Last week my 22 floor office building had a fire alarm. We have fire drills every year so no one was concerned and everyone started down the stairs in an orderly way. Then we smelled smoke and heard sirens. The stairs were very packed and slow moving and many of the women started to panic...Like a meeting about picking up trash around the office and making sure the place is hygenic...if the meeting revolved around how women should do that since they are supposed to clean...well, that would get someone fired for saying something during a meeting and if the entire meeting revolved around that line of thinking then there would be a hostile work environment lawsuit. That's a fair point. I read the post as....the meeting started, they talked awhile, crazy people started talking about wh… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/10 07:33 PM |
| -1 | Last week my 22 floor office building had a fire alarm. We have fire drills every year so no one was concerned and everyone started down the stairs in an orderly way. Then we smelled smoke and heard sirens. The stairs were very packed and slow moving and many of the women started to panic...If the company didn't change their fire evacuation procedure that was in place during the fire drills, then that's still the policy, and the company isn't doing anything sexist. So long as their policies are gender-neutral, then I'd say the company hasn't done anything wrong. The OP can file a complaint against the outspoken employees (specific women, and older men), and the company can decide how to deal with them from there (written warning, termination, etc), and I think that would be fair. A… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/10 07:11 PM |
| 6 | Last week my 22 floor office building had a fire alarm. We have fire drills every year so no one was concerned and everyone started down the stairs in an orderly way. Then we smelled smoke and heard sirens. The stairs were very packed and slow moving and many of the women started to panic...(Most of the women neither agreed or disagreed with the shaming, just sat there; no one advocated for the younger men.) Yep. Looks like the rest just stayed out of it. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/10 06:39 PM |
| 3 | Last week my 22 floor office building had a fire alarm. We have fire drills every year so no one was concerned and everyone started down the stairs in an orderly way. Then we smelled smoke and heard sirens. The stairs were very packed and slow moving and many of the women started to panic...This is exactly correct. The problem was the panickers, not the procedure. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/10 06:17 PM |
| 3 | Last week my 22 floor office building had a fire alarm. We have fire drills every year so no one was concerned and everyone started down the stairs in an orderly way. Then we smelled smoke and heard sirens. The stairs were very packed and slow moving and many of the women started to panic...What could the company have done differently? When they found out there was a problem, they had a meeting to discuss it. When the meeting turned hostile, they ended the meeting. Since they had fire drills in the past, I have to guess they had an exit procedure in place, and that some people freaked out, and didn't follow that procedure. What did the company do wrong that merits litigation? | /r/MensRights | 09/10/10 06:04 PM |
| -1 | Why the hell do men have to pay more for insurance?Hmmm....I hadn't heard that anywhere, but it could definitely be true. If the changes have already gone into effect, it's still not the same exact price, though it could have (as you said) reduced the premium difference. I just pulled up a health insurance quote, from Aetna (first company name to pop into my head) and did a comparison, and there was only a $27/month difference (just looking at the first couple that show up - $129/female, and $102/male), which is closer than I remember it being, … | /r/MensRights | 04/10/10 05:24 PM |
| 1 | Why the hell do men have to pay more for insurance?Is this a new thing? Womens' insurance has always cost more, as far as I knew. I don't think I've done a comparison in about a year, but last I looked, it was substantially more for women. And people with families (ie; children) were subsidized significantly. Worst insurance seeker you could be is a single woman. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/10 06:26 AM |
| 1 | You want equality and quotas for women in Congress, on Boards of Directors, in wages, in science? Fine. Are you also ok with equality in healthcare spending? In sentencing of crimes? In child custody? In Selective Service? Quotas for dangerous, difficult jobs? Quotas in education? Why not?When a man and a woman vie for custody in the U.S. it is the woman who wins nine times out of ten. I'd like to see a study on how often men actually fight for custody, though. Just because women get custody 90% of the time doesn't mean the man even asked for it. There's lots of factors that might prevent someone from wanting to go through that legal battle. Money, living distance, not wanting to disrupt the kid(s)' routines, not wanting to go through the emotional bullshit of a court battle, not… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/10 01:01 PM |
| 1 | How do you deal with women without getting burned?Yep. Should have. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/10 05:12 PM |
| 1 | How do you deal with women without getting burned?Related to above. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/10 04:34 PM |
| 2 | Should hospitals offer fathers free confidential paternity tests as part of their post natal servicesIf we're talking internationally, it's not the same. I recall you're NZ. US companies tend to think if something is mandatory, they can charge whatever the fuck they want. So, the price wouldn't plummet here. Just charge more to insurance, then more to people, specifically. Assuming we have insurance. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 04:31 AM |
| 3 | Serial false rape accuser tried to destroy man's life -- over a beerHowever, one of the officers said he had personally seen Milligan recently and had heard of other officers who had come in contact with her. I'm betting she's one of the mentally ill homeless women that hang out downtown. They see her often enough to recognize her, and that's near where the police dept is, so.... Conjecture, of course, but I'd be very surprised if this were not the case. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/10 08:15 PM |
| 3 | I'm a Father who just went through a custody battle for his children. Here is my story. ( originally in IAMA, but though it would be more receptive here.)I appreciate your predicament, but your son was physically attacked with kitchenware. Abuse tends to escalate. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 06:15 PM |
| 1 | Dear MensRightsWould appreciate it. Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 05:55 PM |
| 2 | I'm a Father who just went through a custody battle for his children. Here is my story. ( originally in IAMA, but though it would be more receptive here.)Well, except being the kids who can't escape, and knowing that the person on your side is powerless to do anything about it....that's worse. I think you should appeal. That's bullshit. Even if it's the same system, two judges may disagree with each other. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 05:51 PM |
| 2 | I'm a Father who just went through a custody battle for his children. Here is my story. ( originally in IAMA, but though it would be more receptive here.)=( Well, from personal experience, I can tell that you being there for them, and fighting for them, goes a long way. Sorry you didn't get custody. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 05:42 PM |
| 5 | I'm a Father who just went through a custody battle for his children. Here is my story. ( originally in IAMA, but though it would be more receptive here.)She responded they wont hat me im thier mom...... She has no idea how wrong she could be. Maybe they won't hate her, but lots of times, kids see through the bullshit, and lay the blame right where it belongs. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 05:22 PM |
| 3 | Dear MensRightsDo you have a link to any of this research? I couldn't find anything. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 05:02 PM |
| 3 | Dear MensRightsHowever, I don't recall the last time I gathered my supper Grocery shopping. Commercials target women, because women still do the majority of the grocery shopping. I don't have a parallel for hunting, though. I wholly agree with your points, btw. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 04:28 PM |
| 2 | Dear MensRightsWhenever the subject of men marrying comes up, the consensus both in writing and upvotes is to not even consider it. Now, the risks are much less for a woman, but I don't see discouraging anybody from marrying, especially at so young an age, as being objectionable. This is exactly what I was going to say. Atomic's tone was fucking rude, but the sentiment isn't any different than the "only an idiot would get married, nowadays" that is common on this subreddit. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 03:57 PM |
| 2 | Lying to get sex: Is it rape?If you're close enough to a woman to fuck her, you're close enough to see if she's wearing a lot of make-up (make-up can only cover up a limited amount of ugly), wearing high heels, the bra usually comes off, etc. Pretty easy to figure out before your dick enters her body. Also, in your scenario, there's no verbal lying. Any "understanding [about]...sex with an attractive woman with clear skin, that's taller, and [whose] breasts aren't lopsided" is inferred. But, like I said, I wouldn't call any… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/10 07:36 PM |
| 7 | Lying to get sex: Is it rape?Not "rape". I don't think "fraud" is an inappropriate term for this, though. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/10 11:35 AM |
| 2 | Who else is disgusted by this"Jade", "Amber", and "Crystal"? What? No "Ruby", "Garnet", or "Cubic Zirconia"? I still call bullshit. =/ | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 07:14 PM |
| 1 | Why doesn't the person receiving money on a child's behalf(child support) have to document how the money is spent?There is if you want it enforced. Otherwise, it's completely useless to say "I want your expense report, but if you don't give it to me, I'm going to....um....uh....be mad!!!". | /r/MensRights | 17/06/10 07:32 PM |
| 2 | Why doesn't the person receiving money on a child's behalf(child support) have to document how the money is spent?They could always do away with the child tax credit, and use that. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/10 04:01 PM |
| 2 | What would happen in our society if we did have a 'male abortion' of sorts?I'm not sure what you mean. I meant terminating your own parental rights. Though, it's moot, if this means the financial obligation is still there. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 02:54 PM |
| 4 | What would happen in our society if we did have a 'male abortion' of sorts?Did some further research, and it looks like you are correct, after all. Though, the language ("not necessarily" & "may") indicates it could be a case-by-case basis. http://divorce.legalrow.com/parental_rights.php FTA: Termination of parental rights does not necessarily eliminate the legal responsibility to pay child support or to pay any child support payments which are in arrears. Even if you terminate your parental right's you still may be responsible for the financial care of your child unti… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 02:50 PM |
| 1 | What would happen in our society if we did have a 'male abortion' of sorts?If it ends the legal parent-child relationship, why would that not cover financial obligations? Termination of Parental Rights is the same process as when the kid is so abused that the state takes the kid away, is it not? The parent is not under financial obligation in that case, so why would this be different? | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 02:17 PM |
| 1 | What would happen in our society if we did have a 'male abortion' of sorts?My understanding is that either parent can seek it. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 02:11 PM |
| 1 | What would happen in our society if we did have a 'male abortion' of sorts?Can someone tell me how a voluntary Termination of Parent Rights is different than this "male abortion" that's often suggested? | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 01:45 PM |
| 1 | Mother punches her 11 year old child in the stomach, Father gets *temporary* custody. X-post from /r/WTF.This woman needs to be sterilized, before she breeds and fucks up another kid. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 01:10 PM |
| 1 | When the phrase "women and children" is used, what is really meant is "non-men"what does a frail 80 year old woman have left to offer the world. Cookies! The old have done their service. So, people shouldn't get to reap the benefits of their contributions? What's the point of contributing, then? | /r/MensRights | 30/05/10 01:55 PM |
| 1 | From PostSecret: A "semi-rape". No mention of non-verbal signals one way or the other.He might have been talking about the forum. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/10 01:24 PM |
| 1 | I used to pose as a Sugar Daddy on Craigslist for nude photos.My dad told me the same thing (before he got remarried to manipulative bitch #2 =/), and he was absolutely right (no one has supported me, since my teens). That said, if he had said "all women are cunts/whores", I would've been pretty upset. An actual example...my mother told me how much she hated my father, almost daily. Then she'd tell me I'm JUST LIKE HIM. Tell me how I was supposed to interpret that. Get what I'm saying? She didn't even have to say it, as it seeped through in her actions, an… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/10 10:35 PM |
| 2 | I used to pose as a Sugar Daddy on Craigslist for nude photos.All women are either cunts or whores. Seriously? Um...don't you have daughters? I would think they'd be pretty hurt if they knew you said things like this. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/10 09:32 PM |
| 2 | “What Would You Do” if you witnessed a man talking to a child? Everything about this makes my blood boil.Strangers trying to lure children away from a crowd are going to be looked upon with suspicion. Especially if they're "asking for help" from a kid, rather than the adult standing 10 feet away. Practical strangers trying to lure children away from a crowd are going to be looked upon with suspicion. Especially if they're "asking for help" from a kid, rather than the adult standing 10 feet away. Those scenarios weren't "mainstream society". Point taken on the supposed "predators", and, yes, they sh… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/10 05:07 AM |
| 2 | How do you feel about a woman going Tyson on a man sexually harassing her?Absolutely. Those specific threads left me with a hard-to-shrug-off feeling, but I'll get over it. It was just very disappointing, especially with how much support he got. =/ I'm not in 2X, much, but I don't doubt there's equally crazy shit. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 07:35 PM |
| 2 | How do you feel about a woman going Tyson on a man sexually harassing her?Yep. Strange thing is, this subreddit had a shit-fit when a (female) teacher attacked a 13 year old boy. I'd venture to say there was probably less of a size/strength difference between the teacher and student, than there was between AnnArchist ( >6'1 205 former wrestler ), and the drunk chick he gut-punched. Being a pacifist, I think both situations were pretty fucked up, but it strikes me as a bit hypocritical. Hence the downvotes, for pointing that out. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 06:55 PM |
| 1 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillWho says a baby has a "right" to life? They don't even get to consent to being born. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 05:51 PM |
| 0 | Crosspost from IAMA: "IAMA man who right after college fled to another country, to avoid child support."And I didn't say "men don't want to be dads". I said "The end result would've been the same with this guy". So, please don't dismiss me, based on things I didn't even say. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/10 03:54 PM |
| 4 | Crosspost from IAMA: "IAMA man who right after college fled to another country, to avoid child support."How do I know? Well, he said: She breaks the news to me and when I start mentioning "our plan" she backs out of it and says she "wants to keep it". This later turns into "she's keeping it and I can choose to be there myself with her or just financially"... She gave him the option. What makes you think he didn't take that at face value? | /r/MensRights | 18/05/10 03:52 PM |
| 1 | Crosspost from IAMA: "IAMA man who right after college fled to another country, to avoid child support."The end result would've been the same with this guy. He didn't want parenting rights. He wanted nothing to do with the kid, whatsoever. So, the kid would be missing support from half his parents no matter where they lived. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/10 03:28 PM |
| 1 | How do you feel about a woman going Tyson on a man sexually harassing her?You are correct. I concede. =) | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 11:45 PM |
| 2 | Male birth control pill seems to be coming in the near future. Do feminists seriously have a problem with this?They also check for side effects, and to see if any health factors have changed, so you basically go through a physical, every year. Also, Plan B doesn't abort a pregnancy. Sperm can take up to three days to implant into an egg. Plan B prevents this, but does not terminate an existing pregnancy. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 10:04 PM |
| 2 | How do you feel about a woman going Tyson on a man sexually harassing her?We're taught from toddlerhood that it's not okay to hit, but, somehow it's acceptable in adulthood? I really don't understand this shit. I'm with you. She should have had him removed by a bouncer/manager. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 09:48 PM |
| 3 | How do you feel about a woman going Tyson on a man sexually harassing her?It's a "sucker punch" if she didn't expect it. Since it's an out of the ordinary response, the chances of her expecting it were close to nil. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 09:15 PM |
| 2 | How do you feel about a woman going Tyson on a man sexually harassing her?No. Around here, it's a sucker punch to the gut that's deemed appropriate. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 09:15 AM |
| 2 | Male birth control pill seems to be coming in the near future. Do feminists seriously have a problem with this?Birth control for women is prescription only, and it probably would be for men, too, so I don't know about combo packs. But, a male BCP would have the added benefit of getting men to the doctor more regularly, which would lead to more funding for men's health, and clinics. This may lead to catching certain diseases and cancers earlier, too, so it might help increase the average lifespan of men. Sounds like nothing but benefits, assuming it's safe, with few side effects. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 08:53 AM |
| 8 | Female Teacher Attacks Boy on VideoIt's not okay to beat children, even when they're assholes. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/10 08:49 PM |
| 3 | When a woman says she was raped, I don't believe her.You know, sarcasm can be construed as "lying". It's no more ridiculous than calling rounding up the time to be "lying". Not that I don't appreciate good sarcasm. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/10 11:07 PM |
| 2 | A one-off blast of ultrasound could work as a reversible contraceptive for men, according to scientists.I'd recommend still looking for a urologist to perform a vasectomy, because you might get lucky. Maybe even claim to already have several children. It could help. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/10 05:16 PM |
| 1 | Anger Manage- A Short Story for MenWell said. You articulated exactly what I was thinking. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/10 02:42 PM |
| 1 | " If your husband hopes he can get out of paying you alimony by filing for bankruptcy, he's going to be very disappointed."Arguing problem? LOL! I get that. No worries, I was just getting a twitchy eye reading that dude's post, and couldn't figure out why you were arguing against something so idiotic. I've read your posts, elsewhere, before, and would not believe you to be a troll. =) | /r/MensRights | 09/05/10 11:37 PM |
| 1 | Mean Mothers Who Psychologically Abuse Their Children Are As Bad as Sex Abusers, Say ExpertsI've often wondered what it would take for a child to be removed from a home, or a parent to be prosecuted, for psychological/emotional abuse. I've never seen it happen. Physical, and sexual abuse, when described, is very clear to recognize. Psychological, and emotional abuse can come in such varied contexts, or is so subtle that, often, people don't see why it's abusive. Or worse, it's so outrageous, people don't believe it could have actually happened. Or even worse, they know how bad it is, b… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/10 11:30 PM |
| 1 | " If your husband hopes he can get out of paying you alimony by filing for bankruptcy, he's going to be very disappointed."Um. Why are you arguing with this person? You've offered citation, he hasn't. Unless he offers something better (more reliable?) you've won. Since he's admitted he doesn't care about his stance being true, and can't prove it, you've won. In other words, you've won. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/10 10:52 PM |
| 4 | 56 percent of abusers of all kinds are women, according to Center for Disease Control and PreventionThis is true, and to expand on this, historically, with men less involved, they were less able to see the signs of abuse. I believe that if a father noticed his child was being ill-treated by its mother, he would call her out on it, and find a way to protect the child. Though I can't find any statistics on it, it appears shared/equal parenting is becoming more common, both within a shared home, and after separation. I'd be interested to see if this will translate into a substantial decrease in a… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/10 10:01 PM |
| 2 | Please tell your daughters never to hit boys (except in self-defense) as it would be exploitative of a double-standard and would thus be unsports[wo]manlike.Was this chick larger than normal? Were there no bouncers/management? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/10 09:44 PM |
| 5 | Mother caught fabricating false allegations of child abuseI ripped into this bitch a couple of months ago. I don't see my post on there, anymore. I'm not surprised by that. There's some serious personality disorder going on there. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/10 11:09 AM |
| 2 | Once-Homeless Redditor: "I never met a woman who didn't have a building to go home to... I think it has a lot to do with the both the locations I was generally in (far from major city centers) and the fact that there are more institutional protections in place for women than men in this situation."If I remember correctly, (and I may not) I think SarahC has mentioned being trans. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/10 03:20 AM |
| 1 | Apparently we are now all White Nationalists. (Read khaydarin's comments)Found it. Exact thread starts here. Edit: I noticed you found it. It's linked for anyone else. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/10 03:12 AM |
| 1 | Why Dudes Don't Want To Be Friends After A RelationshipBut I did have to cut her off in many ways because she was always asking me for favors. What kind of favors? Set boundaries is all I can say. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/10 12:37 AM |
| 2 | Why Dudes Don't Want To Be Friends After A RelationshipSo, late teens, early twenties? | /r/MensRights | 01/05/10 12:32 AM |
| 1 | Why Dudes Don't Want To Be Friends After A RelationshipThen just go for hookers. I don't know any woman that wants a guy around who thinks they are a "psychotic beast", anyway. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/10 12:24 AM |
| 2 | Why Dudes Don't Want To Be Friends After A RelationshipIt's weird that you're right behind me. Back off!! | /r/MensRights | 01/05/10 12:19 AM |
| 1 | "That’ll teach him to be rude" - Another example of Feminism's one-sided equalityEasy sentence, or not, it won't be relevant to feminism. It might pertain to Men's Rights, still, though. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/10 09:42 PM |
| 1 | "That’ll teach him to be rude" - Another example of Feminism's one-sided equalityIt probably has little to do with feminism, but it looks pretty gender-based to me. Then the headline is misleading. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/10 08:35 PM |
| 1 | r/MensRights: What are your views on abortion?Yeah, I thought it was about as close to 100% as you could get, too. Do you remember in which subreddit it was? I'd like to look at those numbers. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/10 10:39 PM |
| 1 | r/MensRights: What are your views on abortion?http://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/tubal-ligation-and-tubal-implants Tubal ligation There is a slight risk of becoming pregnant after tubal ligation. This happens to about 5 per 1,000 women after 1 year. After a total of 10 years following tubal ligation, about 18 per 1,000 women will have become pregnant. 2* Pregnancy may occur if: >o The tubes grow back together or a new passage forms (recanalization) that allows an egg to be fertilized by sperm. Your health professional can discuss which … | /r/MensRights | 26/04/10 09:42 PM |
| 1 | r/MensRights: What are your views on abortion?It's pretty difficult to get a doctor to agree to sterilize (I think you mean tubal ligation, not hysterectomy) a woman of child-bearing age, unless she's already got a passel of kids, and is well past 30 years old. Even then, some doctors just won't. Men have it a lot easier, in that department, but some still encounter resistance sometimes. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/10 09:01 PM |
| 7 | Guess who else is promoting the 70% myth? The ACLU. Sigh...I'm unfamiliar with these terms, DV and VAWA. DV = domestic violence VAWA = Violence Against Women Act | /r/MensRights | 22/04/10 01:12 AM |
| 1 | Be extreme and unreasonableWait till those 15 women get pregnant Who says they will? | /r/MensRights | 19/04/10 09:29 PM |
| 2 | List of anti-men discrimination.Citation? I think it'd be interesting to read. There's a slew of unhealthy shit that happens to women with hormonal ovulation, so I'd like to see how it compares with possible consequences to men. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/10 09:13 PM |
| 1 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?Sorry, fell asleep. No, I've never been married. I'm pretty apathetic about marriage (I'm 30), so, anytime I've entertained the idea (which was twice), it was because it was important to the person I was dating. The first was a reproductive incompatibility, and the second was my pants-on-fire-o-meter was on the fritz. I have no idea if I'll ever marry, but I hope to find a permanent companion. I don't need to "save face" for my gender. Most women I know want a true partner. I think the key to th… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/10 04:14 PM |
| 1 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?Why are your opinions what they are? | /r/MensRights | 18/04/10 02:54 AM |
| 1 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?Okay. You've talked to a woman, one-on-one. I think that a relationship should be "us against the world". I can't speak for every woman. Can I? | /r/MensRights | 18/04/10 02:45 AM |
| 1 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?No, I'm rarely active on 2X, actually. I assume the "hammer" is the "crosspost"? No. Don't assume as much. That's why I said "of your choosing". Doesn't have to be reddit related. I'm genuinely asking you to do so. Go to a different forum. Any one you want. Pose the same question. Don't assume the worst of me. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/10 02:27 AM |
| 2 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?Most women tend to think of it as "Its me against the world" rather than "Us against the world". I've dealt with the exact opposite, but I don't know "most women". Maybe you can ask this question in a forum of a lot of women? I won't suggest one, though. One of your choosing. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/10 01:52 AM |
| 1 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?Men should be themselves. FTFY men and women have their own contributions to make to parenting and running a household. and don't devalue either's [sic] input. Might be a little bit better. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/10 01:34 AM |
| 1 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?It appears common law "divorces" are required, here. Basically, you can claim common law marriage by living together, referring to the other as a spouse, and claiming that you're married to this person on a document (insurance/taxes/contract). If you break up, and decide to split, you'd have to get a "divorce". | /r/MensRights | 18/04/10 12:22 AM |
| 2 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?I'm not sure of alimony. My state doesn't allow alimony, but it is a common law state, so I don't know if those two things are intertwined, or separate (never dealt with either, on a personal level). But, property gets split the same way, here, as if the couple were married. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/10 11:47 PM |
| 2 | So, MR. Marriage Is on the way out. What will replace it?It's "common law" marriage, in certain states, here in the US. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage | /r/MensRights | 17/04/10 11:32 PM |
| 3 | Titanic DayAgreed. Taking funding away from one, instead of pushing for more for the other cause only creates more problems, and deepens resentments. Counter-productive, at best. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/10 09:27 PM |
| 3 | Titanic DayI thought it was prostate cancer that MRAs complain about not getting enough funding? It affects something like 1 in 6 men, but has a pretty low death rate. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/10 07:57 PM |
| 1 | Is There Anything Good About Men? (Social Psychology Talk)If you don't want to breed, then don't breed. If you still have the sexual interest, seek out a child-free woman. Get a vasectomy, as a safeguard. And don't listen to the bullshit about how everyone wants to breed, and there must be something wrong with you, if you don't. There's lots of childfree people out there, just not the majority of people. Be happy, and enjoy the freedom. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/10 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Website offering information about restraining orders is called WOMENSlaw.org, solely features pictures of womenRe: funding...from the right side of the home page: WomensLaw.org is supported by individual giving, private grants, and volunteers. Please visit the Support Us page for more information. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/10 01:43 AM |
| 2 | Jenjena seems to think that men are automatically more likely to prey on women just because they're men.Here's the thread from the beginning, so people can find it more easily. http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/bphch/my_brother_saved_a_girl_from_a_rapist_last_night/c0nx6la | /r/MensRights | 12/04/10 05:34 AM |
| 5 | Mom goes nuts, kills kid. Dad gets 20.She should have been incarcerated on what charges (prior to the drowning deaths, I mean)? Institutionalized, maybe. Psychological treatment, definitely. But, incarceration? How? | /r/MensRights | 02/04/10 06:11 PM |
| 3 | The real truth about 70 cents on the dollar (links on page may be NSFW)crickets | /r/MensRights | 02/04/10 11:40 AM |
| 7 | She Breaks In To My Gmail.You might try this dude's website: http://www.RestrainingOrder911.com He claims to know how to fight restraining orders. Also, didn't she admit to a cop, once, to hitting you? | /r/MensRights | 31/03/10 11:31 PM |
| 2 | Article glorifying female-on-male domestic violence, on popular feminist website JezebelHe got downvoted because he posted an irrelevant thread. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/10 02:06 AM |
| 4 | Article glorifying female-on-male domestic violence, on popular feminist website JezebelWhat were the first 999? No, women mostly can't do as much damage, but in certain contexts, it can be pretty damaging. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/10 01:11 AM |
| -2 | (On buying a ring): "If we are equal partners, what is she buying me?", response (by a woman) "Oh come on"No. He got the plain band, and she got the other two. So, it's not "AND", it's the total. I don't agree with it, I'm just clarifying. Edit: Thanks for downvoting me for clarifying. I had to buy her 3 rings in total, one plain band, one single diamond engagement ring and one wedding band with diamonds on it. I got a plain band, I had to pay for it too. Betting it's the same plain band. She was supposed to buy his ring, she didn't. Therefore he bought her three rings (one on her behalf that she sh… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/10 02:28 PM |
| 5 | (On buying a ring): "If we are equal partners, what is she buying me?", response (by a woman) "Oh come on"What happened to family heirloom engagement rings? Rings don't wither away. If something more is agreed upon by the couple, then the couple can save up to get it, later. Nothing wrong with that. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/10 02:24 PM |
| 2 | (On buying a ring): "If we are equal partners, what is she buying me?", response (by a woman) "Oh come on"This is what I see most often. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/10 02:15 PM |
| 2 | (On buying a ring): "If we are equal partners, what is she buying me?", response (by a woman) "Oh come on"Of course, it's all anectdotal, but I've been to 3 weddings where the parents paid. My sister's included. My mother paid for the wedding part, out of a savings specifically intended for that, and my dad paid for the rehearsal (her husband came from a poor family). I think, traditionally, the groom's parents pay for the rehearsal dinner, though. All three were between 20, and 23. The rest were 25-30-something, and they all paid for it, themselves, with one exception of the grooms parents paying f… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/10 02:14 PM |
| 1 | (On buying a ring): "If we are equal partners, what is she buying me?", response (by a woman) "Oh come on"I don't know that this is very true, these days. Most weddings I've attended have been paid for by the couple themselves. Unless they marry at a very young age, of course. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/10 01:33 PM |
| 0 | Help me. No. Just hear me. Please.**Looks like my post didn't go through, the first time. Hopefully, this won't double post. Also, changed some wording/formatting, and added a quote from link. You're correct, sort of. I don't speak legalese, so maybe one of the law students on here can help??? Federal law appears, as far as I can tell, to say that a warrant is needed. I'm not sure how a non-law enforcement person would obtain a warrant, but maybe I'm not reading it correctly. This links to the individual state laws (as of April … | /r/MensRights | 17/03/10 04:30 PM |
| 1 | Help me. No. Just hear me. Please.You're correct, sort of. I don't speak legalese, so maybe one of the law students on here can help??? [Federal law}(http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/119) appears, to me, to say that a warrant is needed. I'm not sure how a non-law enforcement person would obtain a warrant, but maybe I'm not reading it correctly. This site links to the individual state laws (as of April 1, 2009). Personally, I'd ask an attorney before I covertly recorded any audio, or even video, anywhere, just in case. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/10 04:14 PM |
| 2 | Help me. No. Just hear me. Please.No, scallon is correct. I worked for a surveillance camera company, and we weren't allowed to sell audio capable cameras, nor were we allowed to sell microphones and cameras in the same sale. Also, if they mentioned wanting to use microphones for surveillance, at all, we weren't allowed to sell to them. The only exception was law enforcement, and they had their own dept. Since I didn't work in that dept, I don't know the exact wording/reasoning of the laws, but we went to great cya lengths. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/10 01:07 PM |
| 2 | I just did a little homework on abortion rights in the US. Why does an unborn child have have an act that specifically protects it against violence - yet abortion is legal?Thanks! I'll check it out in the morning. =) | /r/MensRights | 10/03/10 04:25 AM |
| 2 | I just did a little homework on abortion rights in the US. Why does an unborn child have have an act that specifically protects it against violence - yet abortion is legal?So if a baby is born with severe foetal alcohol syndrome leading to brain damage, that would be grounds for punishment. So long as it can be verified by a toxicology report, or they're caught in the act, I could get on board with that. It makes sense that if you have to amend your behavior once you have a kid (child endangerment laws), you should amend it to make sure the kid comes out healthy. If someone isn't willing to make that small of a sacrifice, I don't see how they have any business hav… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/10 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Wow. Just Wow. :OP/ED: Feminism: we've come a long way ... but we're not even close to there yetI guess what I'm trying to pinpoint is, what make the theoretical choices impractical? As in, what would need to change, in order to ensure men have all the same choices? | /r/MensRights | 10/03/10 02:49 AM |
| 3 | I just did a little homework on abortion rights in the US. Why does an unborn child have have an act that specifically protects it against violence - yet abortion is legal?There should be restrictions placed on the activities a mother can do that would place her foetus in danger. How would this be monitored? Endangering a fetus could be drinking, doing drugs, smoking, falling...all sorts of things. But, to prevent someone from doing any of these things would probably require some sort of confinement, which I'm sure is unconstitutional (on more than one count), not to mention sexist (since men can't get pregnant). Anyway, the damage may be done within the first thr… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/10 01:42 AM |
| 2 | I just did a little homework on abortion rights in the US. Why does an unborn child have have an act that specifically protects it against violence - yet abortion is legal?Welfare of the unborn child, as in, what's good for the fetus, or simply having legal input into the decision of carrying to term? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 11:40 PM |
| 2 | I just did a little homework on abortion rights in the US. Why does an unborn child have have an act that specifically protects it against violence - yet abortion is legal?I know that the right to privacy was the factor that made completely banning abortion unconstitutional, but, yes, there were other factors to the full decision. I haven't had a "technical" discussion on abortion, in ages, so I'll have to do some reading. I know they factored in history, and legalized contraceptive with it, but I'll look into finding some actual facts. It's a good topic, though. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Wow. Just Wow. :OP/ED: Feminism: we've come a long way ... but we're not even close to there yetMy best friend is in law school, and her husband is going to be a (sort of) house-husband, once she's got a job, so he can go to law school (for fun!). She'll be postponing opening her practice a little, but, at least it's fair. I would imagine that they'll be getting all manner of shit from his family over it. She should be popping out babies (won't happen), and their gravy train (he helps them out A LOT-which she doesn't appreciate) is going to come to a screeching halt. Oh well. Fuck 'em. I d… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 10:29 PM |
| 2 | I just did a little homework on abortion rights in the US. Why does an unborn child have have an act that specifically protects it against violence - yet abortion is legal?Roe vs. Wade was passed under "right to privacy". Another person killing her fetus has nothing to do with her privacy. State criminal abortion laws, like those involved here, that except from criminality only a life-saving procedure on the mother's behalf without regard to the stage of her pregnancy and other interests involved violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 09:45 PM |
| 4 | Wow. Just Wow. :OP/ED: Feminism: we've come a long way ... but we're not even close to there yetTexas. Strict life-scripters here, and the pressure on women to follow it, is pretty heavy. No kids, you're unnatural, and selfish. Kids/work, you're a negligent mother. Kids/home, you're either lazy/not contributing financially, or not modern ("stuck in the '50s"). The only way to not have someone disapprove of your lifestyle is if you have the kids/work-from-home combo. I didn't know if men get the pressure to marry/procreate. Also didn't know if the "make more money" pressure was there, prior… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 08:43 PM |
| 2 | Wow. Just Wow. :OP/ED: Feminism: we've come a long way ... but we're not even close to there yetWould there not be a choice to forgo a wife and/or family? I mean, do people make harsh judgments about men for that, or pressure them? I'm just trying to get an idea of what men face, and see how/if it differs from what women face. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 08:00 PM |
| 2 | Wow. Just Wow. :OP/ED: Feminism: we've come a long way ... but we're not even close to there yetWhat choice does a man have? Have you dear male reader, ever been given a choice as to what your role is? Or have all of your choices been made for you? Hasn't society demand that you do X and Y and Z because you are a man? Can you expand on this? What specific choices do you feel society dictates? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 07:06 PM |
| 2 | Why I'm funnyYou said: A person cannot be held accountable for an inaction. I simply pointed out that they can (legally, as an accessory), and why people think they should (because that's a fucked up thing to allow to happen to your kid). Frankly, at this point, I'm not really sure what issue you're discussing, beyond what I've addressed. This isn't a wrong place/wrong time type of situation, so your mugger comparison isn't suitable. She bought a lock, which indicates she knew that a) it was happening; and b… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 06:28 PM |
| 1 | The View is the most sexist garbage I've ever seen.I agree with you, but the frequent, and natural result of anything extreme is someone is offended. Or, thinks they're retarded with some very real fear, when the realization hits that someone, somewhere, agrees with them. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 04:34 PM |
| 3 | Why I'm funnyThe issue is that she's criminally responsible, under the law, but (possibly) to a lesser degree. Legally, she'd merely be an accessory. From an emotional standpoint, her inaction is worse, since a parent is responsible for the well-being of their off-spring. Personally, I'm sick to fucking death of reading articles about kids winding up raped/beaten/dead by a parent/step-parent, when the other parental unit knew the abuse was happening. This is where people want to hold the other parent equally… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 03:53 PM |
| 3 | Why I'm funnyShe would be an accessory. An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being, or will be committed. A person with such knowledge may become an accessory by helping or encouraging the criminal in some way, or simply by failing to report the crime to proper authority. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/10 03:30 PM |
| 7 | Cape Coral attorney challenges "Pay or Appear" the program, which he says asks him to pay $132 a week for his 4-year-old son — $12 more than what he earns.Jesus. Talk about emotional blackmail!!! | /r/MensRights | 08/03/10 12:55 AM |
| 1 | Fifth of men 'denied cancer test'right to ask They do have a right to ask. No one is forbidden by law to ask a doctor for a test. No one is guaranteed to be granted a test, but there's nothing showing they can't ask. So asking conforms with current laws. "Semantics" - study of meaning. We're persuing the meaning of word usage, in this context. Fits pretty well, and I tend to be a stickler for semantics, myself. Otherwise, I wouldn't have bothered responding. Ergo, not "confused" at all. Simply believe you to be incorrect, and l… | /r/MensRights | 02/03/10 10:02 PM |
| 1 | Fifth of men 'denied cancer test'Semantics. The article didn't say that any rights were violated. Men do have a "right" to ask for a PSA, just as the doctor has a "right" to decide whether or not (s)he'll honor the request. There's not a law forbidding men from requesting the test. But, I agree that the word "right" may not have served the writer very well. Maybe "option" would've been a better fit? I requested a procedure from a doctor, once, and was refused. I found a new doctor. If the new one had refused, I would have kept … | /r/MensRights | 02/03/10 09:38 PM |
| 5 | "That's fine, as long as he isn't a pedophile." Someone said this to my wife about me being a stay-at-home dad.I think Smight was referring to the typo "dong". | /r/MensRights | 02/03/10 07:49 PM |
| 2 | Mapping Out A Prenup .. Second Time AroundTrust funds. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/10 04:25 PM |
| 1 | “Give modern women the husband they deserve. None.”Jus' cus' not evreewone duzn't, don't mean I don't!!! | /r/MensRights | 14/02/10 05:04 AM |
| 0 | “Give modern women the husband they deserve. None.”He doesn't get that not everyone likes his brand of kink? | /r/MensRights | 14/02/10 03:24 AM |
| 1 | Betrayed by feminism?Fair enough. Thanks for your response. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/10 11:13 PM |
| 1 | Betrayed by feminism?So, do you only date women who also aren't 100% sure whether or not they want kids? | /r/MensRights | 13/02/10 11:08 PM |
| 1 | Betrayed by feminism?I actually broke up with a girl I was really in love with because she was so set against ever having kids (and i'm not 100% sure either way). Just out of curiosity, if you aren't sure either way, then why did you break up with her? Most women are going to be sure one way or another. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/10 10:55 PM |
| 1 | Betrayed by feminism?They do help with keeping your youthfulness, however. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/10 07:35 PM |
| 4 | POLL: What brought you to MensRights?Mommy issues. Matriarchal family, which is chock-full of misandrists, (among other -ists). Although, feminist is not one of those. Was once told by the maternal unit that "Feminism was bad, because now women have to work, where before they would be taken care of completely, and men would be at work, so they wouldn't have to be around.". Yes, there's something very wrong with her. Protective nature. Always want to help those I see getting a raw deal, and try to "fix" it, or give them any knowledg… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/10 10:17 PM |
| 1 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.It's a long, sad, complicated story and it'd take me pages to tell you everything that was going on I won't press. Thanks for sharing what you did, and I'll leave it alone. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/10 05:34 AM |
| 3 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.Which is what I tried to tell my ex's brother, beforehand! Exactly that! Even when they know, they don't always listen. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/10 04:51 AM |
| 2 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.He can sue, it just doesn't necessarily mean he'll get anything from it. Whether or not she was lying could be eradicated by an automatic paternity test at birth (from here on). This is partly what I was trying to get across with my first answer. I don't know how to fix this problem, but neither do "feminists" in general, who, according to kragshot, are emitting cricket sounds when this sort of thing comes up. Neither do MRAs, though. We can say "yes, men should be protected from fraud", which I… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/10 04:40 AM |
| 2 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.Agreed. Men should be protected from fraud. When it can be proved that the woman lied, then I'm all for an appropriate punishment. Pay all the money back, and pay the legal fees. Maybe a little jail-time, depending on the situation. Now, to find a court that will enforce this.... | /r/MensRights | 11/02/10 12:11 AM |
| 1 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.If that's your preferred age-group, more power to ya! | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 09:49 PM |
| 1 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.I think someone, somewhere, suggested a paternity test, before the birth certificate is signed. Or, do it yourself. https://www.homedna.com/paternity_test.html?source=google_homedna Before any court order is in place. No child support, unless the paternity test proves they're the father, or he legally adopts. Yes, I think that he should be able to sue for fraud, and have anything paid back that was paid in, plus legal fees. No, there's no recourse for the guys that are already screwed, right now… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 09:49 PM |
| 2 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.So, what did you do when "she'd flip out about" you using condoms? Did you forgo sex? Or, did you willingly proceed to fuck her without a condom? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 08:34 PM |
| 1 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.You win. =D | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 08:22 PM |
| 1 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.I just want to add that childbirth also involves medical procedures, which can also be life-threatening. Being a woman that's forced to choose between two medical procedures has to suck. So encouraging better/more (preferably two forms) use of contraceptives will never be a bad thing, in my book. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 08:06 PM |
| 1 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.What was the question regarding reproductive fraud? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 07:57 PM |
| 1 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.If societal consequences are the concern, shouldn't society as a whole be the one paying? If society should be the one paying, then shouldn't society be the one making the decisions? That's part of your argument, right? Man doesn't get to make decisions, so he should'nt have to pay. Society doesn't get to make decisions, so society shouldn't have to pay, by that same argument, correct? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 07:39 PM |
| 7 | People think a man should be forced to support his kids, but at the same time he cannot choose whether he wants them.Not to pick an old scab, but these are excellent reasons guys should think about dating transwomen ;) Or, a sterilized, child-free woman. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 07:03 PM |
| 9 | Feminist anti-porn blogger promotes the myth that 'triple anal' is commonplace in mainstream pornography.But, but, but...they were pressured!!! If anything, she's insulting women by implying that they're easily manipulated. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 02:37 AM |
| 0 | Feminist anti-porn blogger promotes the myth that 'triple anal' is commonplace in mainstream pornography.Usually, I associate "whether it's" with a range of things. As in: "whether it's lesbian pillow fights, or sex-swing, gangbang, scat-bondage". Only she used three extremes, instead of a range. But, the point of her blog was "Porn BAD", so, yeah, of course she was going to use extreme stuff. I completely disagree with her opinion, but I still don't see her piece as saying "triple anal is commonplace in mainstream pornography", as the title says. More like a very stretched argument of "I think thi… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 02:22 AM |
| 2 | Feminist anti-porn blogger promotes the myth that 'triple anal' is commonplace in mainstream pornography.No, no! It's all "for research"! /s | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 12:49 AM |
| 1 | Feminist anti-porn blogger promotes the myth that 'triple anal' is commonplace in mainstream pornography.I just feel that porn tends to focus more on the theme "beautiful woman has sex" rather than "Man dominates woman" That may just be a perspective thing. Yes, the men are usually invisible, ignored figures. I don't, personally, see it as "beautiful woman has sex", but your perspective is your perspective. "Oh, that woman is so beautiful with jizz on her tits/face/mouth/crotch" is not what I consider deification, anyway. shrug I'm not exactly an authority on porn, though. I like it/watch it, but I… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 12:43 AM |
| 7 | Feminist anti-porn blogger promotes the myth that 'triple anal' is commonplace in mainstream pornography.Dude on bottom looks like he's one wrong move away from a broken dick. That situation looks more crowded than fun. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/10 12:09 AM |
| 1 | An angry 2X'er describes "typical" MRA behavior. Would anyone here *actually* want to close down a women's shelter? If so, please indicate if you would twirl your mustaches while doing so. And then kick some puppies on the way out.Okay. You lube up, she'll break out the strap-on. Can we watch? =D | /r/MensRights | 09/02/10 11:14 PM |
| 2 | Feminist anti-porn blogger promotes the myth that 'triple anal' is commonplace in mainstream pornography.I read the blog. I didn't see her say that triple anal (shudder) was commonplace in mainstream porn. I saw her use it as an example of a type of porn (probably because it's a rather shocking type of porn...I don't even know how that would work) that actresses were asked/pressured to perform, and said that it's mainstream for the men to be the dominant parties in porn (which is true, is it not?). But, those were two different statements. If I somehow missed it, can someone quote it? | /r/MensRights | 09/02/10 09:20 PM |
| 3 | Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act: Ask For Your Child's Medical Records? You're A "Potential Abductor": Get To The Back of The Bus, Parent!If you want to actually read it. http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/archives/ulc/ucapa/2006_finalact.htm | /r/MensRights | 09/02/10 04:22 PM |
| 1 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.I'm guessing any attempts to point this out were met with resistance and accusation? Of course. She was always the (selfish, entitlement-minded) victim, even if she was the one doing the brow-beating. Lots of "no-win" situations. Lots of being cornered. It was really strange how other family members towed the line, and treated me like the asshole, and her like the victim. Same with my dad. My father didn't handle her shit as well as I (was trained to do) did, so she got lots of victim-hood from … | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 02:04 PM |
| 1 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.Been there, actually. Had lots of practice at "not crying". "Crying" meant she "won". No emotion could be shown. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 05:31 AM |
| 1 | Stop the women Hating, seriously, it is getting old.So...by whom have you been "told this"? Honest question. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 03:57 AM |
| 2 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.So, to "show off"? No, I think I get it. I'm sorry you went through that. Sucks. I got a little of that. M. (I hate referring to her as my "mom") consistently told me she "couldn't afford" things, but had tons of clothes, and QVC/Home Shopping Network shit around for herself. There's more, but it upsets me, so I won't go into it. I'm sorry you went through that. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 03:33 AM |
| 2 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.Mold? Yeah, that is probably pretty rare. And involves a leak in the house, or crazy, crazy humidity. Did your step-mother have hoarding tendencies? I'm about 98% sure my mother had some kind (or multiple) of personality disorder. I seriously think her only reason for breeding was for services to her. Because, yanno, her children "owed" her. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 03:06 AM |
| 1 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.lol | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 02:36 AM |
| 7 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.Yeah. I think you may have missed my joke. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 02:29 AM |
| 1 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.baby-eating monster truck enthusiast Where does the comma go, because I'd be an enthusiast of baby-eating monster trucks, too! | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 02:20 AM |
| 4 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.Replace "ferret" with "birdcage", and you've got my entire childhood. Although, I was a little WTF at the washing of clothes that hadn't been worn. All that would do is wear them out more quickly, and I wasn't bought enough to cover that. Now, I can't stand most house cleaning. I'll do it, but I still resent it. Instead, I just don't let things get messed up, and ignore the dust. Yet, somehow, my house is still way cleaner than my mother's house. Go figure! Her child-servants aren't around to de… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 02:18 AM |
| 7 | Feminist blogger proposes that men who don't do enough housework should face criminal prosecution.Conversely, any woman who doesnt suck enough dick can go to jail as well, right? How many dicks are "enough"? =p | /r/MensRights | 08/02/10 02:11 AM |
| 0 | Women are close to representing the majority of the national work force; it comes primarily as a result of men’s layoffs. The Great Recession is a Mancession.Women cry. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/10 12:14 AM |
| 1 | What Are Men's Rights? (video)I thought it was a male Hello Kitty. Still, adorable! | /r/MensRights | 29/01/10 03:15 AM |
| 1 | Miller published a study in the journal Contraception detailing "reproductive coercion," when the male partner pressures the other, through verbal threats, physical aggression, or birth-control sabotage, to become pregnant. 1 in 3 women reporting partner violence experienced reproductive coercion?You might consider a self-defense class. A weapon can be anything from a gun, to two finger to the throat (not suggesting you do this, just making a point). | /r/MensRights | 28/01/10 02:38 AM |
| 1 | The secret lives of married men.I don't really know why it's a big deal to some women. A friend of mine got mad at her ex when she caught him. She didn't understand why he'd be masturbating when she was there....as in, why wasn't he having sex with her, instead. Struck me as a strange way to think about it. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/10 06:13 PM |
| 2 | The secret lives of married men.Me, too. I just try to not mention it too much in this sub-reddit. I like porn. Don't know a whole lot of women that admit to liking porn, though. I'm sure there's others. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/10 06:38 AM |
| 2 | 'Cruel' U.K. Mom Jailed for Elaborately Faking Son's Illness; violence usually blamed on maleYep. That's true. Per Wiki: One study showed that in over 90 percent of cases of MSbP, the mother is the abuser.[9] In other cases, the MSbP abuser is often another female caregiver. Fathers have been the perpetrators in a handful of professional reports. The female preponderance may be attributed to socialization patterns that encourage females to seek the sympathy and assistance of others. Neuropsychological testing of perpetrators has shown either normal results or nonspecific abnormalities. … | /r/MensRights | 25/01/10 06:31 AM |
| 1 | Cunt, whore, slut. These words are meant to offend. If someone is offended by them, then they are used as intended.How much porn did you have to wade through to get to the "from the internet" definition of "pussy"? =p While it can mean both, you've also got "scaredy cat", as a lesser slang, which could mean that both can be valid. I like the kitty version better, despite my lack of aversion to call a woman a "cunt", when (I think it's) warranted. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/10 05:43 AM |
| 2 | Cunt, whore, slut. These words are meant to offend. If someone is offended by them, then they are used as intended.Isn't "cunt" fairly commonly used in the UK? I think it's only Americans that are uptight about it's usage, but I could be wrong. I consider racial slurs to be worse. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/10 03:13 AM |
| 1 | The Right Man Is Getting Harder to Find:Fairy-tale dreams collide with the dreaded 'operational sex ratio.'How about she just stop believing in fairy tales all together and start looking at whats in front of her. And make some poor schmuck, she doesn't think is good enough for her, her sperm donor, instead? I think the turkey baster is the better idea, here. Better than dragging some poor guy through the mud. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/10 09:52 PM |
| 4 | The secret lives of married men.You know, you might even find that some women like porn, too. Crazy as that sounds! | /r/MensRights | 24/01/10 08:47 PM |
| 2 | Feminists Robbing Dead Bodies For SpermUmmm...that's not necrophilia. That's baby-rabid granny. She wasn't fucking him, she was having a bodily fluid expelled. For something she claimed to think he wanted (via him mentioning wanting a family and some dream she had). The court decided in her favor. They have more facts than you or I do. I never said I agreed with it. I'm rather anti-breeding, actually. I'd like to see less of this sort of thing, not more of it. But, if you want to prevent this sort of thing from happening, then make y… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/10 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Feminists Robbing Dead Bodies For SpermIt's only half a zombie, so what is that? Half milk/half brains? Plus, it'd be hard to find it play-dates with that biting problem. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/10 07:02 PM |
| 2 | Feminists Robbing Dead Bodies For SpermIs this the story you're referring to? http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/01/18/33735.aspx http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2007/jan/24/soldierspermb According to the articles, the mother of the soldier decided she was fulfilling his wishes, because, at some point he had mentioned he wanted to raise a family (which isn't exactly the same thing as impregnating someone after you're dead), and because she had a dream where he asked about his child (whoooo..spooky). My guess is she's one… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/10 07:00 PM |
| 3 | Objections to erotic materials are often made on the basis of supposed actual, social or moral harm to women. No such cause and effect has been demonstrated with any negative consequence.I should have been clearer. Yes, I'm sure it was religious conservatism. I was only addressing what was said about men not having the "right" to ban vibrators, but, regardless of motive for doing so, it has been done. Since it was a law that was on the books for a very long time, I have to assume no one addressed whether there was a "right" to do so, or not...again, regardless of motivation. It wasn't my intention to imply it was done for purely for female oppression, or anything like that. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 10:53 PM |
| 1 | Feminist: 'My dreams aren’t for peaceful egalitarianism. My dreams are for a male-free world.'Well you avoided the question, so I'm going to assume you edited, because that makes more sense. Otherwise, you would have stated that you did or didn't edit. I don't believe it was me that wasn't reading posts. You didn't seem to be following much, and assert that I am a "princess", which is completely nonsensical. And stating that you've made your point doesn't make it so. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 10:44 PM |
| 1 | Feminist: 'My dreams aren’t for peaceful egalitarianism. My dreams are for a male-free world.'Wow. I can't tell if you edited, or I completely missed the "princess" comment. You are absolutely the first person, internet or otherwise, to call me a "princess". Interesting. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 09:38 PM |
| 1 | Feminist: 'My dreams aren’t for peaceful egalitarianism. My dreams are for a male-free world.'Really? That's what you got out of that exchange? My point was it's stupid to lump people together, for both sides, and doesn't help Mens Rights. I don't work under the assumption that anyone here is misogynistic. When I do see comments, I tend to believe it's a bit of venting or general dumb-assery. I actually thought you were going to make a misogynistic comment to try to fit me into some stereotype, because that you thought I was trying to fit you into one. I mean, you've kind of been "well, … | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 09:24 PM |
| 1 | Feminist: 'My dreams aren’t for peaceful egalitarianism. My dreams are for a male-free world.'I didn't have one picked out. I was going to let it be a surprise. =) | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 09:01 PM |
| 1 | Feminist: 'My dreams aren’t for peaceful egalitarianism. My dreams are for a male-free world.'It was you that brought up misogynistic comments, not me. A lot of people make a lot of good points in this subreddit, and I usually ignore the posts that are more interested in attacking feminism than solving problems of inequality. So, someone wants a male-free world. Big fucking whoop. It's improbable that it would happen, if not completely impossible, so it's not a "real" problem, afaic. I want my former boss to burst into flames. Should he spend the rest of his days worrying that it will ha… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 08:36 PM |
| 1 | Feminist: 'My dreams aren’t for peaceful egalitarianism. My dreams are for a male-free world.'So hostile. I don't believe I have an arsenal, I just think the "Look! Look! Someone from some group said something terrible, so they must ALL be like that!" gets old. Keep it up, though. No skin off my nose. so should I help out here and just make some shitty 1950s era remark to help you switch this fully into something retarde an misogynistic so you can bring out all of your arsenal to make it really easy? Misogyny doesn't really help the cause, dude. The comment frequently gets made in other … | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 07:56 PM |
| 2 | Objections to erotic materials are often made on the basis of supposed actual, social or moral harm to women. No such cause and effect has been demonstrated with any negative consequence.For now, yes. It may have been discussed before, but I haven't been on this subreddit very long. This was an actual question. Thanks for the downvotes, though, guys. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Feminist: 'My dreams aren’t for peaceful egalitarianism. My dreams are for a male-free world.'Oh how I would hate to be your friend. Well, you're in luck, there. Apparently, you're choosing to completely miss my point. Or, maybe you just didn't read my post. What you refer to as "leaders", I refer to as "extremist". I came up with an analogy, but maybe you sweep all groups with a broad brush, and don't take individuality into consideration. There's different kinds of feminists. There's different kinds of atheists. There's different kinds of liberals. They all have mouthpieces that would … | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 07:36 PM |
| 9 | A ridiculous (and hilarious) female-supremacist post on a feminist blogDon't you get it? If you aren't creating a needy creature, in order to fill their needs, you're selfish. /sarcasm | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 04:44 PM |
| 2 | Feminist: 'My dreams aren’t for peaceful egalitarianism. My dreams are for a male-free world.'Are any of the people you're referring to, leaders or a part of the top leadership of the feminist movement? If you cannot answer "yes," then explain how peons within a social group reflect the ideology of a group over the leaders with the power. Because there's a lot more peons than leaders. The majority can hold a different view than extremists. It would be bewildering if they do, it would be no different than a Muslim Terrorist publicly stating, "well I agree with the idea, but I don't want t… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 03:32 PM |
| 4 | Objections to erotic materials are often made on the basis of supposed actual, social or moral harm to women. No such cause and effect has been demonstrated with any negative consequence.Men (gov't entities completely comprised of men) have banned vibrators, in the past, though. My state only overturned that law within the past couple of years. And how does porn reduce a woman's sexual value? I've seen some that dehumanizes the actress, but surely men can differentiate real from fantasy. How does a woman having a job reduce the man's sexual power? I really have no idea on that one. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/10 01:11 PM |
| 3 | British Airways sued for treating men like pervertsAs a man and uncle, I demand that female passengers also be banned from sitting next to children they don't know. I wouldn't want my relatives to be sexually assaulted by women they don't know. Think of the children! Yes, please! =) Automatically equating men with sex perverts is despicable. But being exempt from having to sit next to someone else's brat on a plane would be awesome! Hell, I'd like to be exempt from sitting next to my own niece and nephew, most of the time! | /r/MensRights | 16/01/10 06:27 PM |
| 1 | Now they want us to kneel when we peeAlso, the shewee. http://www.shewee.com/ | /r/MensRights | 16/01/10 04:23 PM |
| 1 | Now they want us to kneel when we peeNeither do women. They hover! | /r/MensRights | 16/01/10 04:23 PM |
| 2 | Male Game Show HostsI must be missing the point, too, then. First, I never thought of Richard Karn as especially effeminate. Second, if you want your kids to have a nice "masculine" role model, how about you being your kid's role model? Or, I don't know, maybe monitoring what your kid watches? Your offspring will undoubtedly encounter a whole vast spectrum of people and personalities. It's up to the parents, not television, to make sure their children receive the "right" messages from what they view. It may or may … | /r/MensRights | 16/01/10 03:58 PM |
| 1 | Male redditor posts about being raped by his girlfriend and asks for advice. Some redditors actually care; others tell him to "man up."I don't have much of an answer beyond the burden of proof being on the alleged victim. How can you prove the other knew you didn't have the capacity to consent, if they weren't coherent, either? Or, if you weren't coherent enough to know the details? It just strikes me as extremely difficult to prove. It's a crap answer, since the accused is having their reputation smeared, regardless of guilt or innocence. Even when/if the law assumes innocence, society usually assumes guilt (unless the accused… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/10 01:27 PM |
| 1 | Male redditor posts about being raped by his girlfriend and asks for advice. Some redditors actually care; others tell him to "man up."The media, the laws, and society in general are heavily biased. Men can penetrate. Women would need props to penetrate. Plus, as we've already seen on the original post, men are told to "get over it", or are accused of lying, or emasculated if they admit to rape. Very sad. As for both people blacking out, rape is defined as: §43. Simple rape A. Simple rape is a rape committed when the anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse is deemed to be without the lawful consent of a victim because it is c… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/10 11:02 PM |
| 1 | Male redditor posts about being raped by his girlfriend and asks for advice. Some redditors actually care; others tell him to "man up."Well, unless the girl called it rape to save face with her parents, or the law changed, the 15 year old boy would not be found guilty of statutory rape under Washington state's laws. He may have been socially labeled as a sex offender, though. As in, that was the rumor around town, or something. Who knows. Oh, okay. I can see how the term might seem like it's minimizing the act of rape, by implying it's a gray area. Just from the little I've read about it, I think "gray rape" is kind of a pointl… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/10 09:05 PM |
| 1 | Male redditor posts about being raped by his girlfriend and asks for advice. Some redditors actually care; others tell him to "man up."If a guy and girl have consensual sex when inebriated and the guy is more drunk, is the woman technically raping the man? If she knew, or should have known he didn't have the capacity to consent, then, yes, she would be guilty of rape. Proving it would be tricky, depending on the circumstances. Also had a friend who went to school with a guy labeled as a sex offender because he had (consensual) sex with his girlfriend when they were both 15. What state was that? In my state, the law is: Sexual a… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/10 07:53 PM |
| 9 | Male redditor posts about being raped by his girlfriend and asks for advice. Some redditors actually care; others tell him to "man up."Finally, she started to rub against me and I clearly told her, many times, to stop. "Stop" is equal to "no" when it comes to consent (unless there's some kink going on, and there's a safe word). Your definition of rape is exactly correct, but if he told her to stop, then she should've stopped. He didn't give consent, and this is rape, by the definition. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/10 04:16 PM |
| 7 | Male redditor posts about being raped by his girlfriend and asks for advice. Some redditors actually care; others tell him to "man up."He wanted sex after marriage. Most marriages start out as a dating-type relationship, no? | /r/MensRights | 13/01/10 06:33 AM |
| 11 | Male redditor posts about being raped by his girlfriend and asks for advice. Some redditors actually care; others tell him to "man up."I buy it. I know a man who was raped almost exactly like this, and got approximately the same amount of support by his "friends". He didn't call it rape, but he described it to me, and that's most definitely what I called it. He stayed with her for awhile, because he thought, since they'd already had intercourse, he should go ahead and try to make a go toward marriage. She was batshit crazy, of course, so it didn't happen. He's not religious, now, but still won't sleep with someone unless he thi… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/10 03:43 AM |
| 1 | Did anyone else catch this episode of "COPS"?I haven't watched a lot of COPS, but the episodes I've seen have been the way you describe. Before this thread showed up, I was thinking about that, and possibly pulling up some old episode to see what kind of consistency that was. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/10 11:25 PM |
| 3 | The "post a color as your Facebook status" is apparently something that men aren't supposed to be involved in, we're just supposed to figure it out on our own."Nude" is a beige color. If she were free-boobing, she'd probably have just said "none". | /r/MensRights | 08/01/10 03:26 PM |
| 6 | 80 years old alimony objector goes to prison out of principle - He was still paying alimony to an ex- wife 38 years after the original divorce.Here's a video of this guy talking about it. http://www.joeiannicelli.com/ He didn't say much of anything about his ex-wife. Only the judge/attorney. I want to add that I don't see any details of how the alimony is set up. He's in trouble for arrears. Okay, but from when? I'm not seeing anything that states he's been having to pay alimony every year for 38 years. Just that he's been divorced that long, and he's in arrears. The video states that the alimony was litigated 6 times by 3 different ju… | /r/MensRights | 08/01/10 04:59 AM |
| 4 | I copied the "You are not a princess" blog to my okcupid.com journal for some discussion. It got a little out of hand so I invited the author to join in. She did....if carchamp1 suddenly got an epiphany and realized he wanted to spend more time with his kid, who wouldn't cheer him on? His wife, since someone has to work. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/10 10:11 PM |
| 3 | You are not a princess! 25 points for women and men to considerTo a lot of people, personality is a huge part of attraction. So, if I think person A is an asshole/bitch, their aesthetics aren't going to matter, because they won't be attractive to me. If I think person B is a wonderful person, and extremely compatible with me, then I'm going to find them more attractive, the more I like them. It's the same way for a lot of people I've talked to, as well. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/10 12:56 AM |
| 3 | You are not a princess! 25 points for women and men to considerFor the most part, I don't agree. However, there are times when I get really sick and fucking tired of reading articles about kids getting killed, or severely abused because mommy just had to have a mayun around. There are instances when the kids' needs should come first. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/10 02:48 PM |
| 1 | Feministing mourn the death of a misandrist bigot who called for a 'drastic reduction of the population of males'I don't necessarily agree that "everyone should be mourned". Mourning is for the living, not the dead. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/10 05:09 AM |
| 6 | Feministing mourn the death of a misandrist bigot who called for a 'drastic reduction of the population of males'Feministing annoyed me about 3 minutes into reading it. It's not just the absurdity, it's the in-fighting. Ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/10 03:59 AM |
| 1 | France mulls 'psychological violence' ban — and of course the article only mentions male-on-female violence.Actually, if used properly, this law could help prevent some cases of physical violence. Between my parents, my mother was by far the worst emotional abuser. My dad was short on the anger management skills, and resorted to physical violence when he reached his breaking point. Who was the victim? The one that spent the entire day emotionally, and mentally tearing the other to shreds, or the one that raised his hand? Needless to say, my answer is very unpopular amongst the women in my family. But,… | /r/MensRights | 05/01/10 10:09 PM |
| 8 | Typical attitude of the American Female. Men are not supposed to be masculine, except when women *WANT* us to be - then its time to "man up".Common tactic by narcissistic personality disorder, as well. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/10 03:58 PM |
| 6 | NO HUGS ALLOWED! Is That 4-Year-Old Really a Sex Offender?Yes, he should have been taught appropriateness. Young kids don't have a full sense of boundaries that adults have. So, treating them like tiny adults is inappropriate. Although, I don't disagree with a teacher's aide pointing this out to the parents and making sure they know it's not okay to do that. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/10 05:01 AM |
| 10 | NO HUGS ALLOWED! Is That 4-Year-Old Really a Sex Offender?Heh. I was that weird kid that hugged and kissed everyone "goodbye" in daycare. Man, the charges that would've piled up! | /r/MensRights | 05/01/10 04:58 AM |
| 1 | As much as mothers want their partners to be involved with their children, experts say they often unintentionally discourage men from doing so. Because mothering is their realm, some women micromanage fathers and expect them to do things their way.Personally, I don't think it's intentional. At least not usually. I think that a lot of people have control issues. From what I've read from people who have children (I don't, so I can't say with any certainty), babies are little anxiety generators from the second they pop out (often before). You start having this irrational fear that you're going to break them, or hurt them, or not do the right thing when they get sick. I'm sure that anxiety plays into women undermining the fathers (a la "ur do… | /r/MensRights | 05/01/10 04:42 AM |
| 1 | First-hand account of abusive relationship: beatings, yelling, ridicule, followed by promises that it would all stop. Repeat.Thank you for the clarification. I'm glad you seem to be satisfied with the results, and that you got your kids. Not dragging out the battles for years, and years is invaluable to you, and your kids (emotionally, financially, and time-wise). So, even if your results aren't 100% favorable, it's good that you're done with it. Good luck! | /r/MensRights | 05/01/10 03:48 AM |
| 1 | First-hand account of abusive relationship: beatings, yelling, ridicule, followed by promises that it would all stop. Repeat.Was the 50/50 child custody agreed upon in the first mediation, and the other 5 mediations over something else? Or, was there difficulty getting the 50/50 custody agreement? | /r/MensRights | 05/01/10 01:32 AM |
| 6 | World's first female sex robot to be unveiled next week.They aren't called dildoes, they're called "massagers". Bible belt wouldn't have it any other way. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/10 02:53 AM |
| 1 | Man who was wrongly charged with sexual assault suffered permanent brain damage after he was attacked in prisonThat sounds a little bit closed-minded, in my honest opinion. That's possible. I'm not a robot. I am human, and, like other humans, there's an emotional element to some of my stances/opinions. Part of my nature is to be protective of those who can't (or don't) protect themselves. Always has been, even as a child, myself. Others may be able to be more objective about this than I, but more emotional on other issues. People vary. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/10 12:06 PM |
| 1 | Man who was wrongly charged with sexual assault suffered permanent brain damage after he was attacked in prisonNoted. I didn't assume that he was alone in this opinion. I simply disagree. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/10 01:05 AM |
| 1 | Use sand to help young boys write, says governmentWell, actually, I'd say it's the media, and their fear-mongering that created this fear. "Is your daycare ABUSING YOUR CHILD?!?!?!?...More at 11." It ups ratings, they offer solutions like nanny cams, and background checks, and I have no doubt that the companies offering these solutions throw money in return for the publicity. All I'm saying is that male teachers need to become mainstream. The best way to show children that males aren't the bad guy is exposure (non-sexual kind, of course =p). Es… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/09 09:20 PM |
| 1 | Man who was wrongly charged with sexual assault suffered permanent brain damage after he was attacked in prisonPossession of stolen property doesn't usually bring harm to someone. I'd say this is an appropriate charge in some cases, but not all. They probably have it on the books so that they can take someone into custody for questioning when it does bring harm to someone (armed robbery, assault, whatever). I can only guess. Kiddie porn, however, is harmful every time. A child is being abused to make it. I'm just going to say we should agree to disagree on this, because I'm a little bewildered that I'm a… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/09 08:52 PM |
| 0 | Man who was wrongly charged with sexual assault suffered permanent brain damage after he was attacked in prisonYou've never heard of possession of stolen property? And, no, it might not mean you know the thief, but, the person who sold it to you may. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/09 08:26 PM |
| 3 | Man who was wrongly charged with sexual assault suffered permanent brain damage after he was attacked in prisonWhy should the possession be illegal, but for the presumption that its possession implies that the possessor is sick in the head? It could also imply that the possessor knows the perpetrator. Or, at least lead to where the film originated. Child porn comes into existence from a child getting abused. The goal is to stop the abuse/rape. That's why it's illegal. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/09 08:15 PM |
| 4 | Use sand to help young boys write, says governmentmostly-female teacher body. That's one thing with which I'm kind of concerned. There definitely needs to be more male teachers, but the problem is that whenever a male wants to be near children, the "molester paranoia" comes out. It's really sad. I know someone that was a (high school) teacher, and he basically got into trouble because he drove a student home (with his wife in the car, btw). The mother of said student freaked, and he didn't get his contract renewed, because of it. He was never c… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/09 07:10 PM |
| 7 | Man who was wrongly charged with sexual assault suffered permanent brain damage after he was attacked in prisonWhy would this only be a hypocrisy for feminists? A LOT of people think this way. Women AND men. In fact, I'd bet most of the corrections officers and jailers, of these fine facilities, who are allowing these tragedies to happen, are male. I think this article is pointing more to a problem with prisoner's rights, not necessarily just men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/09 06:59 PM |
| 11 | Man who was wrongly charged with sexual assault suffered permanent brain damage after he was attacked in prisonNicholas Tanner was arrested in August 2008 on a sexual assault allegation and ordered held in custody at the provincial facility while awaiting trial. The charge has since been dropped. When was the charge dropped? Cook claims another Headingley inmate attacked Tanner on April 6, 2009, repeatedly punching and kicking him in the head until he was unconscious and causing "massive neurological injury." Was it dropped after he was injured? Was it possibly dropped because of his injuries rendering h… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/09 04:47 PM |
| 33 | 'You've bankrupted my dad': 13-year-old girl to sue Child Support Agency after legal battle left father with crippling debtsGood for her! It's hard to watch an abusive mother do all she can to destroy your father. Especially, as a child, when you're the reason child support is involved. Makes you feel a bit responsible (though, logically, you know that you didn't make the decision to exist, just that your existence is having the consequence). I hope this little girl wins her case. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/09 02:55 PM |
| 3 | The boys are alright, ladies. The problem is youI think part of the problem with your (rather crass) suggestion is that most men don't know this sort of thing can happen until it happens to someone they know, or to themselves, and no one ever thinks their (potential?) wives are going to act like this, at the beginning. Personally, I don't think your suggestion is as bad as your delivery. Leave out the hookers, the objectification of the potential egg donor, and the basically cutting a person down to an incubator (which is no different from wo… | /r/MensRights | 30/12/09 07:05 AM |
| 5 | Is there any way to secure my assets against my wife before mediation/divorce begins? What is my best protection strategy?Why did you get downvoted? It is a crime. It's considered fraud. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/09 02:10 AM |
| 2 | Two Chinese wives spot common husband on social networking siteI'm almost positive polygamy is illegal in China, and, if it were at all legal, I'd have to wonder how. The male to female gender ratio is 119:100 according to http://tiny.cc/reCmv . So, any polygyny (multiple wives) would make things even worse. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/09 06:33 PM |
| 9 | Two Chinese wives spot common husband on social networking siteWhy is this in /r/mensrights? Can someone explain? | /r/MensRights | 25/12/09 05:38 PM |
| 3 | Domestic violence affects males, tooYes, it does. The world could use a battered men's shelter. Not only from women, but also from male couples. I'd donate to something like this. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/09 01:38 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter