chadonsunday Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
173	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad.	CMV	chadonsunday	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 07:24 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
8	my partner has been getting into red pill thinking and i don’t know what to do Dude for real. Any get getting into redpill is basically openly signaling that they're a toxic sexist who will just manipulate and abuse you. You need to dump them ASAP. Its like FDS for men.	/r/ExRedPill	16/02/21 06:35 AM
1	Women are right about being to picky. That's the way of evolution. If youre having a stroke please call 911.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/21 11:48 PM
1	Women are right about being to picky. That's the way of evolution. Don't think you know what any of those words mean	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/21 11:45 PM
2	Women are right about being to picky. That's the way of evolution. Aaaand that's the level of logic I've come to expect from FDS.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/21 11:44 PM
0	Women are right about being to picky. That's the way of evolution. What does critiquing a toxic, sexist ideology have to do with vagina envy?	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/21 11:40 PM
1	Women are right about being to picky. That's the way of evolution. I wish I could say the same for FDS and FLS and vindicta and the like but unfortunately its worse - even if a woman is ugly and miserable to be around like FDS users are she still has a vagina so she's gonna find a dude to pump some baby batter in there, and then she's gonna have a kid and her bigoted, toxic personality is going to drive her husband insane and infect her children like a heritable disease. Honestly the male route of just never getting the chance is far preferable to that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/21 11:35 PM
1	Women are right about being to picky. That's the way of evolution. As long as we agree there's around 126,300 women on this site alone who shouldn't breed im cool.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/21 10:18 PM
2	Women are right about being to picky. That's the way of evolution. Woah woah woah hold up. If we're talking about eugenics-lite in order to create the best possible children then like 90% of women shouldn't be allowed to breed. Its not just men who should be genetically tested to see if they're viable candidates for reproduction - women should be, too. And unfortunately the vast majority of women won't make the cut, just like the vast majority of women won't. I can certainly guarantee you no FDS user will.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/01/21 07:37 AM
0	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Clearly not.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 07:32 PM
1	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. ITT? People desperately grasping at straws.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 07:19 PM
1	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. 80% of men were rated 2/10, it's not just "below medium", women rated 80% of men as if they were some fat and disgusting pigs, do you even understand how big is the gap? About 27% of men were rated as a two out of five. It wasnt out if ten. You can see the graph in my OP.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 07:16 PM
0	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Average dudes still do have a chance. Average dudes who spend all their time bitching about women online because none of the 90th percentile women they swiped on tinder matched them back probably dont have much of a chance.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 01:51 AM
5	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Chad doesnt get and wouldnt want 97% of all women.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 01:44 AM
4	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. That's been my experience. A handful of mainly religious or incel people with 0-1 n counts, the vast majority with a pretty normal 5-15, and a tiny sliver at the top with triple digits.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 01:43 AM
2	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. If that's the case then the women are correct and the men are just horny.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 01:40 AM
2	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. And I'm not disputing that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 01:39 AM
2	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Thats what in saying. It depends on the context. The speed dating thing found that women would be down to meet 9% of the guys again and it was 18% for the women. If you frame this as 2x it sounds like a huge difference, but if Jill swipes on one of every ten profiles and Jack swipes on two of every ten they're both pretty picky and I dont see a huge difference between the two practically speaking.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 01:18 AM
3	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. I mean kinda. It showed women were twice as picky as men, but the difference was only 9%. 2x sounds like a lot. 9% pickier doesnt sound like a lot.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 12:57 AM
2	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. More like rehabilitation.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 12:51 AM
1	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Yeah. Someone else explained it and it clicked. I feel dumb lol. But yeah that is precisely what everyone has been doing.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 12:48 AM
2	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Compelling argument. Tell me more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 12:46 AM
5	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. More like the rehabilitation stage.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 12:45 AM
2	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Frankly the more we talk I'm not sure statistics are your forte either bro!	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/05/20 12:44 AM
0	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. TIL 89 is between 85 and 75?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 11:52 PM
1	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Yeah. The study did that and found that the top 20% own 89% of the wealth.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 11:48 PM
4	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. So far the most convincing thing I've seen from those alleged "multiple different websites" and studies has been one on speed dating in the UK, and even that didnt provide evidence for most of the definitions of 80/20 I've been given ITT. Every other source of evidence has been bunk. I'm not sure it's fair, then, to accuse me of being the one nursing cognitive dissonance.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 11:45 PM
0	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Admittedly stats weren't my strong suit in high school, and that was a decade ago. What makes those not data sets?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 11:39 PM
7	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. I am not sure where you are going with all that, are you saying that average men should waste years on improving their game so the frequency in which they can acquire casual sex is at best once every couple months? What the average man wants to do with themselves and their sex life is up to them. I will say I dont think it's that hard. I'm pretty solidly average in the looks department, moderately fit but not very jacked or cut, dont have a high power job but not broke, and I first tried my hand…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 11:38 PM
3	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. You'll see the 80/20 rule in action, some might be 85/15, some 75/25 but I can guarantee you that none of the sets will ever fall outside those 2 boundaries. https://whorulesamerica.ucsc.edu/power/wealth.html So is this like a money back guarantee, or...?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 11:18 PM
0	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. I mean they replied to the off topic, joking, pun autobot so...	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:44 PM
5	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. I didn't say the Pareto distribution is inherently flawed I said it's misused in the context of the claims people make about 80/20 in dating.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:41 PM
5	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. He was the one to separate out humans from nature, not me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:40 PM
10	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Did you read the OP? I'm dismissing the Tinder study because it involved 27 Tinder thot's self reported opinions. And OkCupid men being uglier was only one of several possible explanations I gave for why men were rated so brutally. Another is that they're not ugly but just suck at dating profiles. Another is that OkCupid women are genuinely just picky. All just so you don’t have to address women’s risible entitlement, narrow mindedness and superficiality head on. No, mainly just pointing out tha…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:39 PM
6	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Sure, I'll take the data for everything.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:36 PM
8	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Most convincing thing I've seen so far, and at best all we know is that is applies to speed dating in the UK.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:34 PM
5	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. I'm having a really hard time understand you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:33 PM
5	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Welp I suppose that's a better interpretation than how i've seen the rule used and mentioned 98% of the time.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:30 PM
8	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Well then it's a bad coinage. Call it something accurate like "hot guys get laid more often rule" and I wouldn't have taken issue with it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:29 PM
6	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. So not crop yields, then, like you originally claimed? And where's the data to back up your last paragraph?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:28 PM
6	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. From your source: Additionally, it is easy to misinterpret the 20/70 figure by assuming that 70 percent of all women are sleeping with 20 percent of men. That would be an understandable but incorrect interpretation. ... That high numbers of sexual partners are largely concentrated among a minority of both men and women. Since men yield a 20/70 account and women a 20/65 account So you don't have anything to back up your claim.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:20 PM
4	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. The percentage of women who reach out to men out of all women who online date is tiny. Most women don't reach out to men. They let men message first. Not wholly true. 100% of first messages are initiated by women first on platforms like Bumble. And you're the second person to point this out but I have to imagine the number of times a woman has messaged first on all of OkCupid history is more than 27... but the 80/20 rule is largely based on Tinder data that only includes the self reported opinio…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:12 PM
2	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. "Basing it off their own observations" isn't reliable data. Especially given that the people talking about this stuff are on specific TRP forums. It might be the find them attractive for other reasons. It might be they are settling on someone they find unattractive. You made the claim. The onus is on you to PROVE these women find these men attractive when they already rated them as unattractive. I postulated that as a theory to explain why women would still message men they rate as physically be…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:07 PM
16	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. So in speed dating in the UK women pursue the top 9% of men and men pursue the top 18% of women. How does this prove 80/20?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 10:02 PM
3	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Words?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:59 PM
5	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. 80% of the casual sex is being had is done by 20% of the men. What data are you basing this off of? Also, the idea that women message men that they don’t find attractive doesn’t mean women suddenly find the men attractive - it only means they just happen to message men in the 80%. The postulated reason was that they message the men because they find them attractive for reasons other than physical ones, whereas men seem to base their messaging trends solely on physical attractiveness..	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:58 PM
6	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. The wiki on Pareto says the concept was "originally applied to describing the distribution of wealth in a society, fitting the trend that a large portion of wealth is held by a small fraction of the population." The word "crops" does not appear in the wiki for Pareto Distribution or Pareto Principle. Agricultural results do not appear in the examples listed under either page. Where are you getting this idea? And where are you getting the data to support your last paragraph?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:54 PM
3	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. He said in nature, not among humans.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:45 PM
2	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. I can agree with that I suppose. My point was just that it would get us a lot closer to being able to actually establish an 80/20 (or whatever) rule than what we currently have, which I find very flawed and misused for the reasons listed in the OP.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:44 PM
10	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. So you acknowledge the top 2% are enjoying an all you can eat buffet, but in the same breath claim the Pareto distribution is patently false. More specifically I said the Pareto principle was misappropriated to fit the 80/20 "rule" wherein 20% of men are Chads who "get" all the women. It's been demonstrated the Gini coeffecient on tinder would result in it being something like the 10th most unequal country in the world. I talked about this in my OP - that conclusion was based off the self-report…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:43 PM
7	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Well I mean I could imagine statistics that actually would be useful for establishing the 80/20 rule. Some Pew-tier national or even global analysis of attractiveness ratings and who women prefer to sleep with for both long relationships and short term flings would do the trick.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:26 PM
9	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. I don't think I'm redefining it. I'm mainly just looking at the data that the "rule" is based on and seeing if it actually justifies the very dogmatized rule TRP has made it out to be. The only bit that was particularly editorialized was the last paragraph.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:24 PM
14	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Couldn't the same be said of men? The OkCupid data shows that two third of all male effort on that app is spent pursuing the top one third of women (that's messaging data, not who they find most attractive). Since presumably two thirds of the guys on OkCupid aren't all banging one third of the women on OkCupid, many of the guys who do get laid would have to be settling, too, right?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:22 PM
5	The 80/20 concept is inherently flawed, based on data that doesn't represent the population, and selectively ignores parts of that data that make men look bad. Pareto principle has a lot of explanation in nature. Thinking that people are so different from the rest of the nature, is absurd. Wasnt the Pareto principle originally developed to explain wealth distribution? Pareto principle can definitely explain casual sex statistics. 20% of men can get it easier than 80%. Why is it 80/20, then? All you seem to be saying is that attractive guys have an easier time getting laid. That would be true if the "rule" was 99/1, 90/10, 85/15, 60/40, etc. Women dont …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 09:18 PM
3	Are there actually that many women who "rode the CC" without relationships and waited until their 30's to think about settling down? That "study" gets misrepresented by TRP all the time. First of all it's not a study. It's just an aggregation of Ok Cupid stats. So it's not even representative of all OLD, and certainly not representative of all romantic interaction in the world at large. Second, yeah, as you corrected, it's not that the top 20% of men "get" 80% of women. One in five dudes arent running a harem. It's just that women rated 80% of men as below "medium" attractiveness. Which sounds pretty harsh admittedly but agai…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/04/20 06:07 PM
2	Are there actually that many women who "rode the CC" without relationships and waited until their 30's to think about settling down? There's no reason it has to total 100%. It could be 80/15. Or 80/1. Or 30/5. But more my point was that you don't need to be a Chad to be attractive to women, you just need to be a sexually viable candidate, and a lot more men than just the 1% of Chads are sexually viable.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/20 10:49 PM
2	Are there actually that many women who "rode the CC" without relationships and waited until their 30's to think about settling down? I'm saying that theres no way that 20% of the whole global population, one in five people, are Chads and Stacys. In an apparent attempt to rebut this counterclaim you are asserting that if you go to places where hot women are more likely to go you can find over 20% of the people there are hot women. This doesnt rebut my point. It would be sort of like if I said theres no way 20% of the US population are natural blondes and you countered that by saying that you can find more than 20% natural blon…	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/20 10:00 PM
9	Are there actually that many women who "rode the CC" without relationships and waited until their 30's to think about settling down? Most TRP info is like that. Theres a grain of truth or rationality behind most stuff but the concepts have spent too much time being built up to mythology in echo chambers to be reasonable anymore.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/20 09:45 PM
4	Are there actually that many women who "rode the CC" without relationships and waited until their 30's to think about settling down? So basically you're saying that if you deliberately try to go to places where hot women are you'll see more hot women?	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/20 09:44 PM
5	Are there actually that many women who "rode the CC" without relationships and waited until their 30's to think about settling down? When I said that I was more specifically imagining a city like San Francisco where 99% of everyone takes public transit regularly because it's so much more efficient than driving. That's also why I said a public square. Or festival. Or whatever. The point is that the claim that one in five people in the general population are chads or stacys is nonsense.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/20 09:20 PM
10	Are there actually that many women who "rode the CC" without relationships and waited until their 30's to think about settling down? I always thought that was a load of shit. Think about the last time you saw some random slice of the population, like in a subway station or public square or something. Were one in five of the men present swole, suave pussy-slayers? Were one in five of the women present drop dead gorgeous bombshells? Not even close. I'd say Chads and Stacys make up 1-2% of the population at best.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/20 09:07 PM
6	Are there actually that many women who "rode the CC" without relationships and waited until their 30's to think about settling down? How so? What he said doesnt require 100% of women to be doing it. Also IME those stats are a bit misleading. 32% of men and 28% of women have used dating apps at some point in their lives. Single men tend to create a profile and keep it up. Single women tend to either create one thinking it's a good avenue to find true love, encounter the shitshow of terrible dates, and delete their profile OR create/reactivate their profile when they're feeling horny, bang their way through half a dozen dudes i…	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/04/20 09:02 PM
1	Some have been ostracized for years tho Average men absolutely can get free sex. Just not anywhere near the rate that even well below average women can.	/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen	25/04/20 08:01 PM
2	Why women hate sex-workers and women who sleep on the first date. poor white people. Dont you see how hard we have it? We should be given special dispensations and treatment. also white people are genetically superior and all the other races are shit compared to us	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/04/20 08:28 PM
3	Why women hate sex-workers and women who sleep on the first date. Hey man just a heads up u/TheOGJammies is an FDS mod, misandrist, bigot, female supremacist, and chronic bad faith actor (although I suppose that's all covered under "FDS mod"). She searches reddit for anyone saying things she doesnt like about her sub (like the OP) and engages in a few shitty, bad faith exchanges with them (I'm sure you've noticed how unproductive that's been so far). When her Olympic-tier mental gymnastics finally give out and you've got her backed into a corner on all fronts,…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/04/20 02:50 AM
3	Why women hate sex-workers and women who sleep on the first date. Ey man just a heads up - u/TheOGJammies is a FDS mod. She is an outspoken misandrist and female supremacist. She regularly searches reddit for any posts criticizing her sub (like OP) and, after a few hostile and uncompromising exchanges with folks on that post, scurries back to FDS to post selective screenshots of the conversations on FDS so she can get adulation from other misandrists and female supremacists. You can check her history. She does this all the time. Probably best not to engage. Yo…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/04/20 02:39 AM
2	How would the dating market change if men were thinking and acting like the ladies from FDS? So I skimmed through your thirty most recent comments. 17/30 of them are either explicitly or indirectly bitching about men in some form or another. You're also active on a pinkpill sub related to PPF, which is probably the most prominent misandrist sub on reddit after FDS, although more focused on being misandrist. So in short, you're violating step 1; you're going into all your interactions with men with preconceived biases and hatred towards them, and it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy sin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/04/20 08:42 PM
4	How would the dating market change if men were thinking and acting like the ladies from FDS? Step 1: dont be a piece of shit (e.g. sexist, racist, bigot, bitch, asshole, etc.) Step 2: go outside and meet people - find good guy If step 2 is unsuccessful, revisit step 1 until success. Pro-tip: holding opinions like that the male population "at large" are misogynistic asswads who just want a supermodel-tier sets of holes they can fuck when they're not being cooked for and cleaned up after is a violation of step 1 and will invariably lead to a failure in step 2. Good guys dont want to date …	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/04/20 09:22 AM
2	How would the dating market change if men were thinking and acting like the ladies from FDS? It certainly sounds like what the raging sexists at FDS or PPF claim all men are like. Out in the real world, however, it's maybe one in a thousand guys at best. The incel/MGTOW/TRP/FDS/PPF approach is toxic as shit but luckily they're only adhered to by a tiny minority of people.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/04/20 06:11 AM
2	How would the dating market change if men were thinking and acting like the ladies from FDS? They wouldn't have to change much bc most women already meet the basic standards of considerateness and human decency that fds women hold guys to OP is wondering what would happen if all guys were as "toxic picky and demanding" as FDS women. There's no reason at all to suspect that the male version of FDS would be picky and demanding about the same things FDS women are picky and demanding about. It would be stereotypical male things. The core premise of FDS is average women believing that becaus…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/04/20 05:48 AM
1	The implications of what this subreddit says are very scary Sounds like you're doing something that's tanking your chances. It's really not that hard to find a solid guy looking to commit unless you've got some crazy Disney princess "I'm a queen" ego complex making you think that owning a vagina entitles you to the top 5% of men on the planet. If you were genuinely dating people below your league in terms of looks and what you bring to the table then youd be happily married by now. Dating in your own league is a bit tougher. Maybe 2-5mo of a couple first…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/04/20 11:09 PM
12	Unattractive men are not empathetic towards unattractive women Finally, as someone who did marry young who is from a more traditional background, i will also say that the RP philosophy has helped destroy the dating market for young women. I have two daughters and it pains me that they can’t expect positive long term marriages. Ideally I would have raised them to look for a strong husband, but now I’m over here reading FDS/other sources trying to piece together what I should tell them. Nobody wants to be pumped and dumped repeatedly and treated like trash. I…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/04/20 10:17 PM