TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chaosord Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by chaosord on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Just pointing it out. You could also go to Feudal Japan and note that women had the same basic rights as men, based on class. Or various tribal cultures which were/are matriarchies. Or we could focus on more modern cultures.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:20 AM
0

Passed in the 1840's. Before the American Civil War and the end of slavery.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:50 PM
19

Which culture and what time period?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:14 AM
7

And YOUR view of feminism does not, correct? Now a good question is where the both of you got your views of feminism. Honestly, your points/questions have been answered. Now just just unbunch YOUR panties. Seriously, getting upset over downvotes?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:35 AM
1

We're done here. Ad homien and shifting goal posts.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:20 AM
1

I like how you side step my points and launch these really thinly veiled personal attacks. Point 1) The numbers we have to work with are inaccurate. Point 2) They do not tell the whole story. (A man beats someone to death to save the life of someone else. Its a war zone. Ect..) Point 3) By only stating only the percent and not the whole figure you leave out key info. (90% of all crime is done by men. Only 10 crimes. Only 5 men committing the crime.) Point 4) Without stating the percent of the ma…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:15 AM
1

I'm just against using bad stats. Now we get to the fun part, what percent of males will do those acts in their life times? Where is it taking place? Reasons behind it? Are they doing on their own behalf or someone else's? Your point is, men are more violent than women. To which I reply, it depends. Unless to break it down further, its just man hating. Also, the numbers for female violent offenders are under-reported. More often than not, females are given lighter sentences, if not let off the h…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:17 AM
2

They did a study where they chemically castrated violent male inmates. The inmates didn't stop being violent but they were more likely to lose. Further more, stats on rape and the like are highly inaccurate and biased. You have over and under reporting. Different studies done in the same very and place have different numbers. Varying legal definitions of rape. And then you have people who out-right lie about the numbers for political gains. Another thing, aggression does not mean bad violence. T…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:42 PM
1

True. And I am not an MRA for that reason.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:31 AM
1

Feminism focuses on women first and foremost and I find that sexist. That is my beef with feminism.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:30 AM
1

Where as I have dealt with the not nice feminists and have had to deal with anti-male laws passed by them. (Long story short and woman and her boyfriend jumped me and I was that if I pressed charges I would be the one going to jail. Ended up homeless for a few weeks. Was also told it was my fault.) Historically both men and women have been oppressed. And to argue that women now get more help/rights/support now because they are women, is just sexist. You have said yourself that the chief focus of…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:36 AM
1

Oh and can you please name the feminists and the like who do call out other feminists for their misadrany?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:06 AM
1

Why do you cherry pick from the nice feminists? Okay, let's try to clear some things up here; why do you think I believe?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:05 AM
1

Feminist movement to deal with gender based double standards when it comes to jail/prison sentencing? Feminists calling out other feminists for their sexist/bigoted views of males? Feminists movement to end unfair and unjust laws and policies that favor women? Feminist movement to ban male mutilation? You want to know the average reaction of the average active feminist when someone dares to say, "Hey wait men have problems too. Let's help them out as well." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxA…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 02:54 AM
1

And the same could be said of men as well. Which is my point. While feminism has some goals I am all for. However the ideology, what its says about both men and women, the tactics used, oppression of opposing viewpoints and all the BS it comes with (Any group that does not try to expel, which feminism has done before Erin Pizzy(spelling) comes to mind, the members who call for genocide has a fuck-ton of BS) , I just can't stand. On grounds both moral and intelligent.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 02:29 AM
1

Yet you can find cultures out there when men are second class citizens. Must be the matriarchy. And I do buy into historical fact, just not the feminist version of it. My original point is, that since feminism focuses only on women it is a special interest group. Your reply was the same old, "THE PATRIARCHY!" crap. Please take your boogiepersons else where.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:22 AM
4

In the OP's case, it was how much he liked her/what she would bring into the marriage vs. risk of damages Marriage is a civil contract.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:46 AM
2

It depends on how objectification is used. In the OP's context, it is not a bad thing. Also, let's say you can only save one person from a sinking ship and that person would have to help you survive. If you choose the right person, based on their skills and what-not, you both would live. Choose wrong and you both die. You would objectify rather quickly methinks. But then there are cases where it would create a false positive and feed into a negative feed-back cycle. i.e. All men are pigs, all bl…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:20 AM
11

You have yet to provide proof that objectifying, both in general and in the OP's context, is a bad thing. So before going, "You can't do that, its bad PERIOD." prove that it IS bad.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:53 AM
1

Please don't go putting words in my mouth. I said that in some places that old model of, male provides female provided for, is the only one that works. Think tribal cultures in the amazon, where they do not have a tech base to provide guaranteed food. And I have said nothing on my views on gender, gender roles, or anything along those lines. Do not project malice upon me. You jumped right to the acid and oppression. We seem to be working from different meanings of a patriarchy (not THE patriarch…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:42 AM
1

But those are different patriarchies, not THE patriarchy. Each one is different, and exists because somewhere in the past that was the best option for that group to survive. In some places that still is the best option(male getting the sources, female tending to the offspring) . Question, in a patriarchy who is it that gets the materials and enables the caretaker of the household to have the free time needed to do their job? Further more, in those places you mentioned, where are the feminists? O…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:18 AM
1

Now you are talking about a patriarchy, a system where male are more likely to be in charge(though you still have female leaders think every queen ever), where as before we were talking about "THE patriarchy", a system where men control everything for men to screw over women for some reason(a myth, even in the most patriarchal of systems women still benefit, being protected, provided for, not being expected to take of herself). The two terms are not the same.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:03 AM
1

No, its feminists who define patriarchy, and often change what that terms means, in order suit their needs.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:05 AM
1

But it is. "The patriarchy" paints all men into a binary state. Either, against "the patriarchy", the good man, or a supporter of "the patriarchy", the bad man. Considering how quickly people, not just men, who disagree with feminism's ideology are labeled as supporters of "the patriarchy". It seems rather clear that "the patriarchy", another term not clearly defined by feminists, is only used to silence to dissent and create a false sense of "victim-hood".
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:12 PM
1

Nor have most men been represented in politics. Remember all men didn't get the right to vote until after WW1 . Before that it, it was the landowners and, maybe, those who served in the military who got to vote. And please do not try to avoid my question about the male to female trans bashing that takes place in feminist circles.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:36 PM
1

Not really. Currently in the EU there is law saying that at least 40% of all board of director positions must staffed by a female, that is a feminist law. Also equality is term that is loosely defined in feminism. And some rights come with costs. However, I have yet to see a feminist movement/group lobby for both the right and the cost of said right. Also I am going to have to ask you to prove feminism helping out other "minorities" (if a group is around 50% of a population can you call them a m…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:15 AM
1

"equality for women" Just my two cents here: How can you be for equality when your focus is on only one gender? Its sounds more like a special interest group to me.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter