TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chiguy440 Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by chiguy440 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I suppose. I guess I just don't see why we should kick people out of school for a tattoo or piercing but I'm just of a different generation.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:45 PM
-23

You sound kinda proud of that.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:21 PM
-2

Weiner sent them to people who didn't want them, and the recipients leaked them. Yeah, there's a difference.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 11:56 PM
5

Pretty sure he turned down cash from TMZ to post it on /b/.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:11 PM
0

Which is why I said in itself.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:20 PM
1

Unsub, really. This place makes it seem so much worse than it really is.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:33 AM
1

Get a really strong prenup. Also, robin Williams didn't commit suicide because he got divorced. It might have been a factor, but it's far from conclusive.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:30 AM
1

There's really only that one comment, and I have a feeling it only got so popular because it used the "Well reddit advocates X, but if you think about it NOT X is actually better..." It's like saying "I'll get downvoted for this.." Regardless, I don't really see the problem in marrying for money in itself. I can also understand why someone would reconcile with a cheater, but meh.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:26 AM
2

Serious question: are teachers allowed to have sex with 17 year olds where that's the age of consent, IF the 17yo is not their student?
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:05 AM
0

Are you sure you know what priori knowledge is? Because not only does it not make sense to talk about in this discussion, it has an even smaller place when discussing journalistic ethics.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:42 PM
1

http://depressiongenetics.stanford.edu/mddandgenes.html http://www.nhs.uk/news/2011/05May/Pages/genetic-link-to-depression-found.aspx Obviously not everyone who is depressed is so as a result of genes but yeah, you are about 2-3x as likely to be depressed if you have it.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:42 PM
1

I wasn't really trying to be hostile, just think it's hilarious livestock were somehow mistaken for humans in an article.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:29 AM
-1

Now I'm genuinely curious because while I don't really like those sources I find it hard to believe they actually insinuated live stock died rather than humans. What was the article about?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:43 AM
-2

Nobody has shown me a source for this claim, which kind of matters because usually there is some context as to why gender is pertinent.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:38 AM
-3

Probably should be reading higher quality sources.. Or improve reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:13 AM
-4

Ultimately it's contextual. Preference or apparent bias towards women or other previously marginalized groups only exists because we don't live in a vacuum. And unless that livestock comment was a joke, I don't know what to tell you.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:00 AM
0

Went to journalism school. Not new at all.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:50 PM
0

:/ Either the quality of this sub has seriously diminished or I have a selective vision. Worse than /r/feminism in that sense but at least here you just get downvoted instead of banned, which is far far better.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:30 PM
-1

Where are these reports, might I ask?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:17 PM
1

Any examples from reputable news sources? Especially ones about natural disasters. In those other situations context may play a factor in identifying gender, but id love to see those as well.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:13 PM
-2

Would saying 15 men and 5 women were killed in a fire humanize the story? The answer is no. The media (good media, and even the very liberal-leaning NY Times) will report deaths as individuals without a gender because, why does it matter? As for ISIS, the men were treated differently than the women. The fact that we still need to add gender when women are involved simply shows coverage is basically male-centric. I don't want to get too off-topic but I do believe there are instances of anti-male …
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:08 PM
2

I don't even get this.. What is the point?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:50 PM
-4

Posts like this are why our movement needs to gain some intellectual firepower, because the idea that this coverage is anti-men betrays a basic understanding of media. This isn't some "women need to be saved" or "we care about them more." It's because men are the standard. Stories about men are assumed.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:46 PM
3

Money is basically the only universal metric this era uses to define happiness. Unfortunately, this means we can hide behind it instead of focusing on real problems. Although, being broke is also a problem.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:36 PM
1

Er wat? Depression is genetic. It has been isolated to a single chromosome.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:34 PM
5

Amazing to see what people are saying about his ex-wives. Someone on this thread called them murderers...
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:31 PM
2

thank you
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:26 PM
-10

I don't think he committed suicide because his life's debts and assets were not square. And while I'm all for being controversial, this is in poor taste.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 06:22 PM
-17

This guy dies and THIS is what you think of? Dude..
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:03 PM
1

Nope he probably just has his doctorate.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:42 PM
2

Sigh apparently not.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:28 AM
2

You're forgetting everybody here will take a mile if you give them an inch.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 05:03 PM
0

Only the title says he, and honestly that's more a matter of grammar than anything else.. Edit: whoops didn't see the titles to some paragraphs.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:30 AM
5

Wins the awards for most uses of "fuck" in a minute. Also, valid points.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:31 PM
2

What examples of there are this?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:20 AM
2

I'm not just pulling this shit out of nowhere, here are sources: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/jun/05/why-working-class-people-vote-conservative and the excerpt in this piece comes from a book by a famous linguist who has seen left-wing policy fail again and again because they try and ensure that republicans vote in self-interest: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/20/1147715/-Top-Comments-On-Those-Who-Vote-Republican-Against-Their-Self-interest#
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:34 PM
2

No, people tend to vote their values. This is why tons of lower-middle and middle class people will acknowledge Republican values help the rich, and still vote that way.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:19 AM
1

Is this process actually a felony?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:43 AM
2

Actually some studies have found people actually don't vote in their self interest..
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:50 PM
3

Isn't it actually more like manslaughter? Or am I missing something.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:37 PM
0

Wait are Muslims paid more?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:57 AM
-1

Feels like the red pill is leaking..
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:59 AM
1

Actually I don't. One character with depth isn't enough to signify misogyny but the fact they used to pump out movies like that all the time. And princess in the frog is 2009.. By then they had taken steps to correct their errors.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 09:26 PM
0

Name =/= personality.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:09 PM
0

It's the part where they have no personality at all, and are just objects. Later movies/pixar editions don't make this mistake. Also not saying this is justified for zapped, just saying it's not unusual.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:11 PM
-1

Well let's be honest it's not like the 70 years of misogynist movies Disney released were panned.. Although this movie looks terrible in its own right.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:22 PM
3

Anyone care to explain what's offensive?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:49 PM
1

Huh? I took an extra dose of hydrocodone and I em now confused as hell
/r/MensRights19/07/14 05:44 AM
1

I assumed it was a parent showing their child off. Which is weird, but they're parents after all..
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:08 AM
-8

Haha well the niece is another story.. And there I see their point.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:00 AM
-27

People are really analyzing this into misandry? Nobody is watching those guys, they just think a vagina is gross ffs.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:07 AM
0

It is a big deal when it happens. Im just not sure if it's truly an epidemic.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:35 AM
0

I dunno, I think it can be dangerous as well. I haven't seen anything that says false rape accusations are very high anyway.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:12 AM
1

Bitch =/= asshole.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 12:10 AM
4

Right but there's nothing "male" about it, other than the fact he had to use a singular pronoun. But go ahead and be angry by this. Clearly the author was "just having fun" and you're "misrepresenting him as an asshole."
/r/MensRights04/07/14 10:05 PM
4

In the pictures where gender is ambiguous, the writer refers to the person as "him" because it's an individual. You cannot refer to an individual as "they." the article misrepresents both genders. The writer is an equal opportunity critic. We shouldn't even waste time thinking about this.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 09:14 PM
2

For your other comment- yes they are both represented here, and he uses a gendered pronoun for the ambiguous because "they" is semantically incorrect. As for faith it's not a matter of content changing, it's just more that I've been around and can see why some people would characterize this subreddit negatively.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:23 PM
5

My faith in this subreddit has been going down every day :(
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:37 PM
9

Come on, both sexes are represented here.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 05:57 PM
1

hmmmmm...
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:57 PM
3

Really? I expected more of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:51 PM
1

Author never said to ban it, he said we need to give it up.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:49 PM
2

you da real mvp
/r/MensRights29/06/14 07:42 PM
2

Yeah it seems like a stretch to me as well, but it seems like that's what was happening in one of the pictures and I didn't want to assume..
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:01 PM
2

Do you know where I can read about this? Not so much adult and a child but two children? One of these men indicated that it occurred when they were both 8 years old and that's an issue I know nothing about.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:12 PM
1

I'm curious, are you from the US?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:20 AM
7

This isn't really of concern but aren't salmon some of the only fish that DO swim upstream?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:47 PM
1

Mccaskill ain't great but she's better than akin..
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:38 AM
2

I agree with you, I just made the remark like that to prove my point.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:57 AM
5

Errr, no, some people believe all people are good.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:31 AM
16

Some people operate under the impression that the vast majority of people are ethical.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:25 PM
7

So what if it is?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 06:21 PM
11

Then surely female discrimination doesn't nullify female privilege?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:46 PM
3

Well I think it generally makes for shitty films if you have a bunch of flat female characters. But I also think it's problematic because women are far more underrepresented then men. Individually in a movie it's not the worth but when we take women and media as a whole I start to see issues.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:33 PM
3

Christ I am.. But as far as I remember brave wasn't like this. Edit: ill need to rewatch again. But I'm not sure that even if it is it's a problem. We should be worried when this is the ONLY way men are characterized in films or at least a majority of the time.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:17 PM
1

Hans doesn't fit this stereotype at all.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:07 PM
-6

Honestly don't see the big fuss about this whole issue. I wouldn't worry about it. Edit; guess I'm the only one tho
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:56 AM
1

Ahh got it.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:20 PM
1

Wait, what? Similar push back from what group?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:29 PM
1

Would you care to expand on this? I'm failing to see the parallels..
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:14 PM
1

Yeah, really annoying quirk to me as well but the guy is actually a fantastic writer and convert case does the trick.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 09:13 AM
1

Ah fair enough, I was tired when I wrote that word.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:29 AM
1

Well you're saying that anyone without a great body shouldn't be in the media with exposed skin?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:06 AM
-1

Also that phrase you have at the end isn't a thing..
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:11 PM
0

Ah, pretty ignorant I think but to each his own.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:08 PM
5

Why is it wrong to be proud of her body? I mean, I don't want to look at it on TV but I don't see what's wrong with it. I do agree with the writer aspect, I hate when a director/writer writes themselves into something..
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter