chinachinachina3 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Colorado man forced to pay $730-a-month in child support to ex-wife despite DNA test proving he is NOT the father of her child This is wrong. The man held themselves out as the father by waiving his right to testing. And, agreements based on unproven facts can be binding. Paying child support and holding yourself out as the father is not a binding agreement between the man and woman. It is an agreement between the man and the child. You cannot break that bond by proving no relation after the fact. Why do you disagree with this?	/r/MensRights	29/11/17 09:13 AM
0	Colorado man forced to pay $730-a-month in child support to ex-wife despite DNA test proving he is NOT the father of her child You're trying to use terms like, "infringing on his freedoms" as if he had them TAKEN without recourse. The man can always say in the beginning that the child is not his. This is the basis of all civil and criminal lawsuits. Here's the order of operations: She makes a claim. He accepts the claim. The child/parent now has rights. Any defenses or claims that can be made from the facts that compose the foundations of those claims must be made from the beginning. Every dude failing to do that is fai…	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 10:28 PM
-1	Colorado man forced to pay $730-a-month in child support to ex-wife despite DNA test proving he is NOT the father of her child This is no longer about the woman and the man. It's about the child and the man. The man held himself out to this child as the father. You cannot walk away from that. It's that simple. This is not misandry, this is for the child.	/r/MensRights	28/11/17 03:24 PM
1	Don't hide how you feel. Men are allowed to feel sad. Sorry, I was away for two weeks. Your argument still starts with a Men's issues are larger and more serious statement. I don't claim societal issues to be a singular problem as you indicate in your response. I'm simply saying that everyone deserves assistance regardless of the difficulty of their lives.	/r/MensRights	23/09/17 02:49 PM
3	Don't hide how you feel. Men are allowed to feel sad. Your argument falls flat because even if men had much easier lives, they're still deserving of a society that will listen. Why the he'll does the difficulty of life dictate the empathy to which a man is entitled? Lose all of your talking points. Suicide is preventable. Society must care for its members. Rich and poor, hard and easy, long and short lives are all deserving of help. Not everything has to be a pile on of manhood tropes.	/r/MensRights	09/09/17 02:24 AM
1	Was unable to locate the mens restroom at Wendy's. Sure, it's where people get free legal advice from legal professionals. Super useful if you're non practicing attorney looking to keep in mind why you left practice. It's also interesting to see the problem solving at work.	/r/MensRights	03/09/17 09:07 AM
0	Was unable to locate the mens restroom at Wendy's. Sure, but it's gotta be pretty annoying being a legal professional modding a sub dedicated to legal professionals answering legal questions for free wherein you get political complaints... Complaints that are largely baseless.	/r/MensRights	03/09/17 08:46 AM
-4	Was unable to locate the mens restroom at Wendy's. The sub is solely for giving and receiving legal advice. It's called the side bar. It is not for people to guess. And, it's not for passive aggressive people to complain with the report button. You might dislike the manner in which US law is executed, but an internet forum dedicated to legal advice by legal professionals isn't a place to complain.	/r/MensRights	03/09/17 08:33 AM
-1	Was unable to locate the mens restroom at Wendy's. Because the sub is called legaladvice... It's literally only designed for legal answers to legal questions. You're not supposed to interject any feelings about impropriety, society, politics, etc.	/r/MensRights	03/09/17 08:20 AM
5	Was unable to locate the mens restroom at Wendy's. Because it's a legal hypothetical sub. The goal is to give an answer to the legal hypothetical, not complain about politics.	/r/MensRights	03/09/17 02:00 AM
2	Feminist privilege. The deception is irrelevant because a man does not have to be the father to legally take on the father roles. This is the crux of the issue. There is no where in the legal system requiring a biological relationship between a child and father in order to gain the rights, privileges, and duties of parenthood. Anyone can simply trust a partner... or a man can require testing. It's his legal right to require proof. The law should not allow a party to prove fraud when that party has actively stood up…	/r/MensRights	18/07/17 10:29 PM
2	Feminist privilege. You're putting the entirety of the argument behind the idea that a man shouldn't have repercussions for his actions. Making this about a lie is missing the point entirely. This is a position with unbreakable duties and rights. The man isn't summoned by the government and forced to list themselves as anything if they contest. They make a claim to you being the father. If any woman told you that you were the father when you thought you weren't, why would you sign on the dotted line? Why would you …	/r/MensRights	18/07/17 11:52 AM
2	Feminist privilege. what do you mean how could a man contest fatherhood? The same way every other man that has contested father hood does it. Are you kidding me? You make an obvious and open statement to the woman, you hire a lawyer, and then you man up. I'm not dumb. In fact, when I learned this in law school, it wasn't that big of a deal to almost the entirety of the class. As a would be father, you have the absolute right to contest it. And, if you have any questions, why shouldn't the would-be father contest it…	/r/MensRights	17/07/17 01:00 PM
1	Feminist privilege. Driving on roads is not a right. It is a privilege. You're now just speaking nonsense. Man, I wish there was an electronic system to fact check the nonsense you're spewing.	/r/MensRights	16/07/17 02:31 PM
1	Feminist privilege. You mean, a man who was deceived but did not utilize his right to contest his fatherhood? Why should this be any other way? The father has an absolute right to contest fatherhood. But, when a man doesn't contest the courts should allow them to back out whenever they want? Why? This isn't the way it works for anyone else. Why the hell should it work that way for fathers?	/r/MensRights	16/07/17 02:29 PM
-5	Feminist privilege. There are plenty of these cases because the man holds themselves out to be the father. This is why... The're legally proclaiming that they are the father. You can't just go back on that. This isn't hard.	/r/MensRights	15/07/17 01:54 PM
22	Feminist privilege. Do you earn rights? Aren't they part of the bundle of citizenry?	/r/MensRights	15/07/17 01:47 PM