chiropter Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
5	European Union will "freeze" job offers for men if gender targets are not reached, a top Eurocrat has warned Brexit fuck yeah	/r/MensRights	30/07/16 11:02 PM
7	Woman tries to "withdraw her consent" later in the day, Lauren Southern denies her pussypass eyeslit? have you ever heard of a peephole or been in a city where literally every apartment has one	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/07/16 07:22 AM
14	Woman tries to "withdraw her consent" later in the day, Lauren Southern denies her pussypass It's almost like that analogy being shit doesn't mean that there isn't a better one for the notion of consent. Giving consent is its own thing. If you give consent for someone to be on your property, they do so and then leave, you can't later withdraw consent and accuse them of trespassing.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/07/16 07:19 AM
31	Woman tries to "withdraw her consent" later in the day, Lauren Southern denies her pussypass Actually I'm not sure that's a great analogy, if the renovator does a shoddy job or does something not in the contract you could take them to court.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/07/16 06:57 AM
35	Its only a prank ! - No bullshit response Same	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/02/16 08:00 PM
1	If "no means no", then what does "yes" mean? I'm asking how you "prove" consent anyway. That's the wrong standard of evidence.	/r/MensRights	11/03/14 07:31 PM
2	If "no means no", then what does "yes" mean? What other evidence might be acceptable? A video of the act? Witnesses?	/r/MensRights	10/03/14 12:32 PM
0	Women engineers doing Engineering Post-graduate courses to be given £1.25k a month in grants Going through this, I have to say that I'm mostly agreeing with you except on two points. One, /u/ilovehate is absolutely correct that you cant get by by just memorizing calculus. Or actually, perhaps some do, but they're not as good at creative quantitative thinking. You actually see this problem quite a lot in high school/ college students: not even realizing they don't understand the material, but caught up in 'competition' and vastly overestimating their own ability. Guys tend to do this mor…	/r/PussyPass	18/01/14 08:09 AM
4	Paul Elam should take down register-her.com Downvoted for implying that you personally know that people who might agree with MRAs never volunteer.	/r/MensRights	14/04/13 07:32 AM
1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Actually, I'm repeating what I said earlier. Fuck off.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 05:31 AM
1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Try not to let your existence be validated by your internet persona Stop projecting. Oh the irony here.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 04:15 AM
1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Only the truly stupid are convinced of their superior intellect in the absence of evidence either way. You have no evidence, only assertion. GTFO out of here troll.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 04:11 AM
1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Only thing I'm proving is how intellectually insecure you are that you have to make up shit to random strangers on the internet to feel better about yourself. Now GTFO like I told you earlier, troll.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 04:02 AM
1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate You're still not getting it I see. Ok lets make it 2% then so you have a chance! QED: You are making up numbers and typing them in the comment box. Sorry I made you run to the dictionary on that one BTW.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 02:55 AM
1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate QED.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 02:11 AM
0	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate See previous comment. In reference to your assertion that you are in the top 0.02% of anything other than asshattery, as the Calvin and Hobbes comic strip goes, "All we have here is one 'fact' you made up." Good luck with that.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 02:00 AM
0	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Only the truly stupid are convinced of their superior intellect in the absence of evidence either way. You have no evidence, only assertion. GTFO out of here troll. Edit: Also, that wasn't ad hominem. Ad hominem means to attack the speaker personally to discredit their argument. By calling you "idiot", I was just expressing disgust/impatience at having to clarify something so obvious, not trying to discredit your argument.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 01:46 AM
1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate You should stop baselessly asserting you are more intelligent than other people when you are clearly not. Only someone without an argument resorts to ad hominem. Troll.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 01:20 AM
0	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Only an idiot argues without evidence, as you have been doing up and down this comment section. In fact, the only evidence we have is that you are an asshole of limited rhetorical capability. So go take your inferiority complex elsewhere.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 01:11 AM
-2	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Keep telling yourself that shit for brains.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 12:55 AM
0	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate implying you are smarter than me lol. It's fine to put a kid in child care that early. Most smart people do. You wouldn't know about that though.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 12:23 AM
-1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate No you idiot, it's called child care.	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 11:29 PM
0	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Yeah, you'll notice I amended my comment to say that.	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 09:43 PM
-2	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Companies that have been around for more than a century by their nature probably have less competitive pressure than young ones (after all they survived longer). What the fuck? Dude stop making excuses. Maternity/paternity leave may not be the be-all-end-all solution to all the problems here but it is certainly helpful, and possible in the US.	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 09:43 PM
-1	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Yes, they are being punished. You can call it an opportunity cost if you want. Either way, most advanced economies recognize maternity/paternity leave as a necessity to equitable opportunity, since it punishes the people who enable the next generation of citizens, workers, etc. Italy for example has a lower birth rate (below replacement) than many Northern European countries because in Italy it is expected there that women leave work if they have kids; this is such a high penalty, which many can…	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 09:41 PM
0	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate Having a child is individually a choice but societally a necessity. That's one reason why society should not punish the class of parents over the class of childless.	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 09:34 PM
0	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate I never said your mother should be relegated to housewife, but someone should stay home with the kids, it's as simple as that. You are implying as much. Somebody needs to give up their career to have kids. Fuck that shit. Kids need supervision and obviously lots of parental attention but they don't need a parent around constantly doting on their every move unless they are spoiled brats. They shouldn't, but they should drop in salary or not expect the same pay because they spent a year away. In m…	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 09:28 PM
8	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate They risk it fine in Finland, Germany, and other advanced economies. Who's to say that people need a year off work anyway? I don't know how the specifics of a good policy would work, but it's certainly doable, and not just nice in theory.	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 08:38 PM
16	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate as someone who was raised by two working parents i fucking reject that my mom should have been relegated to housewife because my parents had kids. We all benefit from paternity/maternity leave because we all have parents. And we all have an interest in a productive economy where people are not employed below potential because they took time off to care for a newborn.	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 08:27 PM
10	feminist myth of women earning $0.72 to a man's $1 repeated in u.s. presidential debate For instance, if women’s labor market experience is less likely to be continuous (for example, due to childbearing), then just controlling for years of work may not fully control for the differential effects of experience on male and female wages. Have to say, as a male, this itself is discriminatory, as well as punitive to families- women are punished for taking time off work, in employability, experience, seniority, etc. Edit: In lieu of replying individually, I just want to say that it's not …	/r/MensRights	17/10/12 07:25 PM
3	A wide ranging & open-ended viewpoint that story about the robber was fake.	/r/MensRights	14/10/12 02:34 PM