TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chobbo Archive

View 0 posts and 102 comments by chobbo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

4B good MGTOW bad The intolerant, hypocritical Left.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:22 PM
2

True, however the previous person was saying "korean men...refusing to be conscripted into the military" My point of clarification: "They cannot refuse to be conscripted; that's now how Concription works. It's not a voluntary process of a process by means of a request that they can deny." Even if they refuse to pick up arms, or they abandon post/go AWOL/escape from training, they are still conscripted. Executing Objectors would not be wise at all, either. Also agreed, but "being wise" is not the…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:19 PM
4

I don't think Conscription works that way.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:49 AM
8

These women are the same kind who would go around putting white feathers in men's pockets to try and shame them to go to war. But if you suggest they too sign up? "I can't do that, I'm a woman!"
/r/MensRights27/10/24 05:43 AM
-4

Probably does it all the time in her own country with no consequence. Comes to Australia and fucks around, finds out. That being said, the force was excessive.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 07:01 AM
10

Point out to them how many dollars was lost based on each attendant being distracted for an hour, and the cost that the company has had to take onboard for their immaturity.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:35 AM
10

One Willy for two tits? Need more Willy’s. Two for two!
/r/MensRights15/09/24 08:19 PM
9

Just make it a mandatory part of the procedure for having children; Paternal testing of the child at birth.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 02:26 AM
12

I’m questioning why an app designed for women, to which a transgender female is suing, matters to a men’s rights group. Neither the complainant nor the defendant are male.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 11:16 PM
20

What does this have to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights24/08/24 10:51 PM
-5

This misinterprets the reason behind Shapiro being anti-trans but pro-circumcision; he's Jewish and religious. The quote that 51% of circumcised boys develop signs of PTSD is also not clinically significant; it's a literal coin-flip and there are many more reasons for the development of PTSD. That being said, I still disagree with his point, but I do acknowledge where he is coming from, and why he believes his point.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 01:40 AM
7

Pretty sure the original is satire.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 02:44 AM
22

"Give me one good reason why people shouldn't have to sign up for the draft, and it can't be the two most common and relevant arguments against the draft." Who are you?
/r/MensRights01/08/24 06:53 AM
5

The “kids” are in their 40s. He shouldn’t be doing anything for them regardless of relation.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 12:23 PM
6

That being said, if you’re already in the position where your body isn’t making enough naturally, it may be better to forego natural production entirely if you can get back to normal levels through medical assistance, wouldn’t it?
/r/MensRights30/06/24 05:19 AM
37

You are both idiots (not OP, you and the other person suggesting to join up and do mma/some other martial art). Now amount of martial arts is going to protect you from being king hit.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 06:44 AM
1

It's not even a median within the industry. It's a median across the population of female workers vs male workers. The problem is, women tend to work in different industries, and those industries pay less. That's not a pay gap however; that's a lifestyle choice.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 02:05 AM
3

tl;dr: Women in the video argue "pay gap exists" Their argument is skewed towards an average pay difference in the population of women vs the population of men. They do not take into consideration the difference in jobs being performed on average between the two genders. They refuse to believe that the way in which they calculate the "difference" is misleading, despite admitting that when a comparison between a male and female in the same job role would receive equal pay. When asked "do we have …
/r/MensRights08/06/24 02:01 AM
2

6min40 sec = the "gotcha".
/r/MensRights08/06/24 01:51 AM
55

Also means that raping a girl who is too young to conceive is technically not rape, despite the act being far worse.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 01:09 AM
30

Sue the bar.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 09:20 AM
22

I would say that it is degrading to both in general, for different reasons.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 12:18 AM
42

…because they contributed more?
/r/MensRights26/12/23 09:11 AM
86

30 men contribute more to australia than 1/3rd the pop of Iceland?
/r/MensRights26/12/23 08:37 AM
12

If she was okay with him cheating on his fiance with her, then she would have been okay cheating on you with him. You dodged a bullet by accident.
/r/MenSupportMen25/12/23 07:24 AM
1

Here’s the thing: most people do not believe this, and those that do aren’t worth your time.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 05:13 AM
4

I’ll restate the previous; when you are desperate for fighters you take what you can get.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 06:22 AM
5

When you are desperate for fighters you take what you can get.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 05:45 AM
41

It is pretty much equivalent to "stealthing". The difference, is where some men will deceptively remove the protection of a condom to enjoy sex without the woman consenting, some women will deceptively remove the protection of a condom to enjoy contraception without the man consenting.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:06 AM
7

and exacerbate the problem...
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:16 AM
76

Majority of people judging men are women. Majority of people judging women, are other women.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 06:34 AM
197

Ahh yes, the app designed for women to make the first move…only most women hate making the first move and expect men to because it’s “chivalrous.”
/r/MensRights07/11/23 11:50 AM
3

Therapy may be a starting point. Other than that there is not much else you can do. Either continue to let it eat at you, or resist the depression and make the day-by-day steps to move on with your life in a positive light. I’m glad to see that you are bucking against the common rhetoric in this thread of “oh you should sue”. I’ll admit I originally thought the same thing but the fact that you have decided it’s not worth the pain of going through the bullshit and that you just want to get on wit…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:55 AM
6

Yep, and look where he is now.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:50 AM
33

You’d like to think so. However I’ve heard some horrific stories where children have been returned to an abusive mother despite all evidence of the abuse, for no reason other than “she’s the mother”. This includes one instance where a child was forcibly removed from the fathers custody and returned to the mothers custody after the child had run away from the mother, due to the ongoing sexual abuse the child experienced at the hands of the mothers new boyfriend.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:00 AM
47

If I were him I’d be getting a different lawyer. This one is already rolling over saying just give her what she wants and accept it isn’t getting better. In fact I’d be contacting a local men’s rights group or support network as they would have resources and contacts for lawyers that will actually hold your interests.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:27 AM
24

More like “Australian opinion article writer”. She’s hardly a journalist.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 12:21 PM
3

“Job”
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:31 AM
48

Fake AF
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/23 12:14 PM
34

I would disagree with the statement they made. Men are at a higher risk of suicide attempt, and suicide success. It's just that female suicide is todays trending topic, just like anything to do with women.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/23 12:46 AM
5

He should sue them for loss of earnings.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:36 AM
2

Because revenge porn had the potential to result in the victim suiciding as a result of the public exposure and humiliation and degradation felt.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 10:38 PM
2

To me this is equal to revenge porn, if not worse.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 09:27 PM
0

Get him into a gym.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 03:45 AM
1

How would you even find a group, or get insight into the group if you don’t have any female friends to snoop on your behalf?
/r/MensRights08/06/23 01:08 PM
3

Sounds like a solution is to abandon online dating.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 01:01 PM
3

How do you even find out if you’re on one of these groups?
/r/MensRights08/06/23 12:48 PM
5

“Excuse me, I don’t identify as a cis male. I identify as a real male.”
/r/MensRights14/04/23 10:01 PM
15

Yeah no. I’m all for equality but having a right to an abortion as a man “just because women do” in order to make things fair is dumb. I’m more than happy for the concept of right to walk away; right to abort is a nope from me.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 03:20 AM
5

Honestly, pretty damned shit. A couple of months ago I reconnected with an acquaintance who I had not seen for about 3 years. We talked for a few months via text and then via phone chats, realised we both were into each other, and liked the same things. The online friendship developed into a long distance relationship, and when we met up in person for the first time in years (she drove the 7 hours to visit me), we hit it off well, I thought this was it, she’s the one. And for the first two days …
/r/MenSupportMen17/01/23 12:55 PM
1

Probably because those same women also realise (but refuse to admit) that we aren’t as bad as they say we are, and those same women probably feel like, if they stop shouting on about us, people will start looking at them and wondering why they have changed their tune.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 04:30 AM
1

Because sometimes it doesn’t come out at the start of a relationship but halfway through. Obviously it’s laid out at the start in situations where it’s on a tinder profile but there’s also times where the decision is made by one partner to “spice up the bedroom”, and the other partner either has to go along with it or leave.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:44 AM
3

From my understanding, it's when both partners "mutually" agree to the idea of seeing other people while in the relationship together. My belief, is that it's when the girl says "I want to see other people" and the guy agrees, because if he doesn't, then she will either split from him or cheat on him.+
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:35 AM
4

Isn’t it the whole non-monogamous scenario that is increasing in frequency in dating apps? I see so many profiles on there where they have something like “ethical non-monogamous”
/r/MensRights22/12/22 11:08 AM
6

Go scorched earth on these cunts. You won’t get your time back, but you’ll at least set yourself up for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 06:13 AM
6

Then it’s not necessarily useless for men, providing they are provided therapy from better-suited providers
/r/MensRights28/11/22 01:29 AM
19

Because gay men are men. Gay women are women Lots of straight men simp for gay women even though they know they have no shot with them.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 06:16 AM
3

No, because you're a bloke.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:07 PM
3

No fucking shit. Women have unlimited opportunity for an "upgrade". Men have limited opportunity for "something else".
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:34 AM
4

Because they fetishize violence towards men.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:22 PM
0

Don’t pay, see what happens. If she’s not in the state how can state law be enforced; she’s not subject to or protected by the state if she’s in another fucking country.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:48 AM
1

I’d just love to rock up to her little shindig and sit in the ladies chair, see what she says.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/22 12:08 PM
2

One reason is that the laws are inconsistent from state to state. IMO they should have made it a national law, or at least attempted to standardise the law across each state. A second reason is that some states took on “appearance” of a firearm as part of determining whether or not it was legal or illegal. Visual aesthetics should not determine the legality of a firearm since it makes no difference mechanically to the how the firearm operates. A third reason is that a lot of these laws are set b…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:18 AM
2

I disagree and think it’s a suitable reason to own a firearm. I do agree however that “automatic” firearms are not necessary for self defence.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:01 AM
4

Well in America the default is “right to defend yourself”, which everyone has and therefore that is the ‘reason’ for a firearm. We don’t have that right in Australia.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:54 AM
5

Me personally, as an Australian, Pro-gun person, my opinion is that they should not be outright banned, but there should be some additional checks in place, prior to the sale of a firearm to an individual. Now I don’t know the specifics of American law in firearms; my understanding is that it varies state to state (Australian firearm laws vary from state to state also). From what I understand certain action types are restricted in some states while other states allow almost any action-type. I wo…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:39 AM
2

Are you saying it’s a woman’s job to do laundry? /s
/r/MensRights25/01/22 09:51 PM
12

Lolno. Good luck to 120lbs Betty dragging 260lb Bobby after he’s had his kneecaps blown out.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 11:54 PM
31

There's stupidity on both sides of the political spectrum; it's not confined to conservatives. Conservatives tend favor the "men are the breadwinners, women are the caregivers" Liberals favor the "strong independent woman who don't need no man". In either case, men are expendable, or unnecessary, who only have a responsibility to provide and then be disposed of.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:56 AM
2

I agree with all those points, however “half of all domestic abuse victims are men” seems like a strange statistic; there’s only two genders, so making up half in that instance is the best you’re going to get without swinging the other way.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:12 AM
6

How is this a pussy pass post when the prosecuted has no pussy, and no pass?
/r/PussyPass26/08/21 09:02 AM
13

You get a "hey?" You lucky Bastard!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/21 10:09 AM
1

SO....a lot more efficient?
/r/PussyPass17/09/20 11:51 AM
7

2020 B.C Before Covid.
/r/PussyPass08/09/20 07:49 AM
13

Man. Cliche as it sounds, but word's can't describe how horrible and unjust your experiences are. What got me the most, is your dad's refusal to reconcile with his innocent son, because "my wife doesn't like surprises". That's fucked up. If I was in your exact situation and my dad said that to me, I would of told him not to expect me to visit him when he's alone on his deathbed.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/20 08:00 AM
14

No mention of Australia and we have a lower %infection rate than a lot of these countries, and a lower %death rate too.
/r/PussyPass14/04/20 08:18 AM
4

Tell that to the male victims of domestic violence who have had their "partners" chop their penises off in their sleep.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 08:42 AM
3

Or he could be so on edge now in times where he is under stress or facing a conflicting scenario, that any trigger for stress causes a fight or flight reaction, mostly fight. Either way, it sucks.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 06:20 AM
2

And yet, so many people are dumb enough to think it protects against diseases.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 09:36 AM
43

Lesbian Aboriginal MtF transgender = top tier.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 05:16 AM
4

That's because the majority of their audience are old pensioners or stay-at-home mothers.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:01 AM
3

Imagine an add about toxic femininity, in which the tampon actually absorbs all of the toxic feminism out of the women and changes them "for the better". That is what the latest Gillette advert is to men.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:25 AM
2

me personally? No.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 12:07 AM
1083

Woman: "quit bring a cry baby and man up" Men: Mans up Woman: WAHHH TOXIC MASCULINITY
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:52 PM
1

I'd park there anyway and dare them to assume my gender.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:19 AM
3

Well at least we're heading towards equality in this particular aspect.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 08:33 AM
1

Should have asked for it back when the spare became available.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:31 AM
7

Nobody has to chase chubbies if you think about it.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 01:00 AM
4

Not making it a hate crime embolden's manipulative women. Just look at girls who grew up knowing that most boys are taught to "never hit girls under any circumstances". They abuse that knowledge and think they can get away with hitting men because they know most men won't hit back. If you take away a person's ability to defend their self, others will abuse the situation to their own advantage.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:47 AM
1

Teaching men "not to rape" is about as effective as Facebook Activism.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:55 AM
4

The kid actively sought out the prostitute with the full intent of deceiving her, in order to get laid. Big difference between "14 year old sexually abused by teacher" and "14 year old tricks prostitute into sleeping with him/her". EDIT: If a 14 yr old girl actively deceived a male prostitute in order to get laid, I'd say the same thing, with the only difference being that I would also be wondering why the hell a 14 yr old girl would feel the need to seek out a prostitute when there's plenty of …
/r/PussyPass05/09/18 01:30 AM
14

Not sure I agree in this particular case. He actively sought out her. He deceived her with the intention of getting laid and to lose his virginity. It's nothing like your "30yr old teacher seduces student" scenario, where there is an unbalanced status-power involved; he being the 'client' is in complete control of the situation. I understand that the law pretty much locks her into being guilty by default due to his age, but I honestly think this particular incident is a victimless crime. Edit: T…
/r/PussyPass03/09/18 02:56 PM
4

How does any of this relate back to the original topic regarding old mate engaging in drunken sex, and how this somehow means that the guy took advantage and forced the girl. Seems like everytime someone makes a counterpoint, you change the goalposts by introducing another argument...
/r/MensRights10/07/18 06:44 AM
9

It's because that is the law in the Western World, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:20 AM
11

Define "too drunk to consent". Explain where there's any indication in what old mate said, that described her as "too drunk". A 15 yr old can utter "yes fuck me" stone sober and it would still be illegal (Statutory Rape). Show me where there's a legal requirement of sobriety in order to give consent.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:18 AM
12

I don't know the specifics on the Cosby case, but I'm fairly sure the difference between that case and TroubleTheMerlin is that Cosby was drugging the woman without her knowledge/consent, whereas Merlin and the woman were both willingly engaging in alcohol consumption, and both agreed to shag as a result of alcohol consumption. It wasn't like she passed out and he took advantage of her being unable to say no. From the information provided, it appears that, while both he and she were under the ef…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:15 AM
38

Not sure if serious. If you are, then what the hell!?!?!? they were both in the same alcohol-induced mindset and both willing participants. Regret =/= rape. If not serious, then you got me, f*ck you.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:03 AM
65

Clearly you are not from Australia, and therefore have not experienced the judicial system here. BRB intruder breaks into home. BRB getting sued by intruder who injured himself.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:38 AM
3

This needs a followup. Would love to know whether they did report it and whether she went to trial in the end, and what the outcome was.
/r/PussyPass03/03/18 07:35 AM
17

What about the freedom of a child to have a fully functioning penis without being exposed to physical trauma fresh out of the womb? Fuck anyone who says "lets mutilate a newborn boys penis because religion!"
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:59 AM
2

Well that basically paves the way for her and any other woman to go around attempting to hire hitmen, until they finally find one that isn't an undercover cop, because the precedence has been set which enables them to do so, and get away with it.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 08:14 AM
1

Wow. How can they say they have insufficient evidence of a false sexual-assault accusation? They have BOTH the tape proving nothing sinister occurred from the driver, AND they would have the police report from the accusation originally filed by the women!
/r/MensRights13/11/16 09:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter