TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chortle-guffaw Archive

View 1 post and 139 comments by chortle-guffaw on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
763

chortle-guffaw/r/PussyPass03/02/19 12:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Recording your interactions is a good start, but it's not enough. You can be accused by women you have never met. Location tracking on your phone can show that you were somewhere else at the time of the alleged incident.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 04:48 PM
12

A prenup that protects assets acquired before marriage is reasonable. Unfortunately, the way things are, she can decide to leave at any time for no reason and take half your stuff. She can cheat on you, file for divorce, and take half your stuff. Until the legal system changes, a prenup is your only protection. Don't compromise. If you convince her, do it the right way so that, if it comes to it, it will hold up in court. Plenty of men have been screwed by women who talked them out of a prenup, …
/r/MensRights19/02/26 06:28 PM
1

It's not an ad hominem argument when it is the very core of the argument.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 05:34 PM
0

"Some" and "handful." Let's define that as somewhere between 1% and 10%.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 04:57 PM
1

Another internet rabbit hole. You will never win or even find common ground with this. Next ...
/r/MensRights13/01/26 01:30 PM
6

First dates for coffee are a great litmus test, and they're cheap enough that you actually *can* pay for her. First dates are about getting to know someone, not impressing them. Better to pay $10 for a coffee date to find out she thinks she's the prize than $100 for dinner.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 01:49 PM
25

Dangling a house is a horrible way to try to meet women, especially if you want to meet a woman with the qualities that you value. Don't stop trying, but don't use the house as a bargaining chip either.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 02:18 AM
29

of available women. The good ones are locked up.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 02:16 AM
3

As a man, you can do everything right and still be screwed in the end. This is why men go MGTOW. There is no way to tell in advance if a woman will stick with you or not.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 01:33 AM
3

It could be a shit test, as others have said, but my sense is that she might have seen you as just a friend with benefits. You were someone she could share with, like her girlfriends, and it didn't even occur to her that your feelings would be hurt, because, after all, to her you were just friends. Dude, don't let her change your life. If you do, she wins. You need to get back in the saddle again and be willing to take chances in life and in love. Before you do that, you need to fix yourself, yo…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 07:58 PM
20

There should be a "hall of shame" web site to put these videos up, including the name
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:40 PM
6

Who does she think she is? Nancy Mace?
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:38 PM
4

here's one: Blood type calculator
/r/MensRights25/12/24 09:33 PM
12

Fortunately for a few, blood types may rule out fatherhood. Some blood types in the child may be impossible based on the blood types of the purported parents.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 02:24 PM
137

No accountability. I'm shocked.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 07:07 PM
22

> why do western men marry when the laws are stacked against them? A lot of men are asking the same question. A lot of the guys I know who are in long term marriages also have a dead bedroom, so they don't even get sex out of the relationship. They exist to support their spouses lifestyle.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 01:57 PM
6

Many women get their heads filled with online content, where they are told that they are the prize and don't have to contribute anything to the relationship, other than existing. Please avoid moving in with her unless you can come to find common ground that is satisfactory to you. You will never be happy if the relationship contributions are 99%-1%. At this point in your relationship, she should be making a significant effort towards contributing to the relationship; doesn't have to be money nec…
/r/MensRights12/10/24 01:01 PM
3

whenever a man wants to split the bills or chores with his partner, he is mocked and regarded as "unmanly" or feminine. It's because there is no logical argument against this, so the only thing left is emotional.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 02:56 PM
4

If this prevents even one unwanted dependent, this post worth it. Many men haven't even conceived (pun intended) of this level of planned deceit. This is your wake-up call. Among other precautions, take your used condoms with you or rinse them out in the sink.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 02:55 PM
2

This is why you don't talk to the police, even a denial. Nothing. Nada. Zip. It can't help. Save your evidence for the DA if it comes to that.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 02:43 PM
4

There's nothing in your post that is anything new. It's been this way for as long as I can remember. What's new are the women who want an expensive first date and have no interest in a relationship. Instead, plan a coffee date or an inexpensive activity. That will help weed out the gold-diggers.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 07:49 PM
15

Tell us again about that male privilege thing?
/r/MensRights17/03/24 03:05 PM
13

These retreats ain't cheap, I'd think.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:09 PM
11

The victimhood culture is raging, and white women are getting trounced. This is a last gasp effort to climb up a few rungs on the victimhood ladder.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:06 PM
7

When he says something is true "by definition," that apparently absolves him of any explanation. If women demand a 10, it's your responsibility as a man to become a 10. Just quadruple your income, get some plastic surgery, and hit the gym. Simple. /s
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:43 PM
3

Dinner for first dates is not a good choice. The women who ghosted you afterwards, maybe some of them just weren't into you, some of them were just after a free dinner. I think a first date should be short and casual, maybe a walk along a lake and a coffee. Or, maybe just coffee. Just long enough to see if there is chemistry. You want to meet women who understand this. If most women won't agree to this, it's OK. You've saved time and money.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 12:27 AM
119

I have no skin in this game, but I find the controversy entertaining. You have critics who see misandry in the movie, and then you have those who are offended by even the most minor criticism. It's like a contest to see who can be the most offended and score the most internet points. "I just was bored out of my mind" There you go. Now you've done it. You've managed to thread the needle and piss off *both* sides.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 04:02 PM
3

I question how widespread this trend is. However, I don't doubt that there are women who are persuaded to join the tribe who would not have done so on their own
/r/MensRights04/08/23 12:35 PM
6

Bro, you won the argument but you keep pressing it further. Don't do that.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:58 AM
14

While not definitive proof, that she hasn't filed for support from you is a strong indicator that she knows or suspects that you're not the father. If you have any way of finding out the child's blood type, you may be able to exclude yourself as the father
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:44 PM
6

I would avoid any face-to-face contact with them, except for required meetings where there are witnesses. If you're approached to talk, ask them to call you from their desk. Do not explain yourself or give reasons.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:19 PM
3

Hey, don't call me petty. Or Shirley.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/23 06:28 PM
2

My bad on the marital asset thing. Not sure why keeping separate finances is a big deal. Don't most couples have both separate and joint accounts? Maybe she reads this as you trying to identify all separate assets, even post-marriage, as being the same as premarital that she has no right to in the event of your death or divorce? Is that your intent?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:29 PM
28

The problem is, the guys they want are after younger women, and can get them, unless they're going after guys in their 70s or so.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 12:17 PM
2

Limited or no alimony is good. It's a strong incentive to work things out when they get tough. Most divorces are initiated by women, and a lot of these divorces are not due to the man's fault. As for the "half of my assets if I died before we have kids goes to charity," I assume you mean that half of your half of the marital assets? So really, a quarter of the marital assets? So based on what you've written, she'd get 3/4 of the marital assets and 100% of the house? Or, 100% of the marital asset…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 11:49 AM
12

It's a nightclub. She doesn't know who you are. And as Plus-Swan587 said, it's a shit test. You can give shit back, or you can walk away (again, preferred). Just don't get sucked into their argument. In my city, you piss off an uppity angry black woman, a reply with a gun is a very real possibility. Either she goes out to her car to retrieve it, or she calls her boyfriend who shows up with one. These are crazy times.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 01:04 AM
49

The mistake you made was letting her get under your skin. That's what she wants. She won. Then anything you say justifies her behavior. The best response is to ignore, but if you can't do that, make comments that show that you don't give a shit what she thinks: "Feel better now that you got that out of your system?" "My six year old niece can give me shit better than you. You are not worthy of comment. You need to up your game." "Remember when you were pretty? Yeah, me neither." "You should cons…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:13 PM
2

The good news is that, as you get older, you care a lot less about what people think of you, especially people who don't know you. Think of this as a honey pot that attracts the crazies. If you want to date a woman, you can check the group and see if they are a participant.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:18 PM
18

This is a situation where phone location tracking, like that on Google, can exonerate you. It can prove that you were nowhere near the alleged victim when the attack occurred.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:13 PM
35

Many female coworkers have said that they hate working with a lot of other women, and especially hate women bosses. This is always unsolicited information, or in response to something said or done. I've never heard this from a man. That doesn't mean they're not thinking it, just that they're not verbalizing it.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:27 PM
25

Any guy who falls for the expensive dinner for a first date is naive. Always suggest a coffee date. It is a great filter. You'll weed out the gold diggers without spending a dime.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 02:18 AM
4

At least we have a completely unbiased source.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 05:05 AM
2

It’s not always a good thing to indulge every little self conscious thought I agree with this. However, we're not talking about a possible weekend fling here. We're talking about devoting more than a quarter of your life and several hundred thousand dollars to this new human. It kind of begs the question: at what point does it become OK to validate without being judged?
/r/MensRights03/01/23 01:01 AM
3

Downvoted? Welcome ladies.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:47 PM
7

On the positive side, even if you're sure it's yours, you've probably read cases on the internet from other guys who felt the same way and were wrong. Getting rid of that 0.01% of doubt lets you go all in and be the best dad and partner that you can be.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 04:38 PM
5

There's no reason he needed to ask her for a paternity test. He could have done this discretely.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 04:12 PM
37

I like the first part but not the second. Explaining that you've been accused of mansplaining sounds defensive. Yes, give a high-level esoteric explanation with insider buzzwords and acronyms. Always start by assuming they have a high level of knowledge and you can't go wrong
/r/MensRights24/12/22 03:31 PM
18

It is the abundance mentality of both the 80% of women and the 5% of men. Women getting a dose of their own medicine. Why should the 5% guy settle down if women are throwing themselves at him? Since I don't date guys, I don't care what he does, though.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:41 PM
28

as the woman has imprinted a 'higher value' man. The woman who decides to settle for her orbiter is thinking with her head. Unfortunately, the heart always wins, and the heart is permanently imprinted with the higher value man that she thinks she deserves. Even if she doesn't pursue this, she is not committed to giving it her all in her relationship. She will believe that just existing is enough of a contribution. Guys, this can't be fixed.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:38 PM
1

First, there really is no MGTOW "movement," so it can't be cancelled. MGTOW is a personal decision. While there is information shared, there is no formal organization, no proselytizing, no shaming for those who choose another path. Nobody has said that there are no "decent" women out there, however you define it. There are, I'm sure. The problem is: 1- I think the percentage of single women who are "decent" is lower and are harder to find. 2- If you do find one, do you want to marry them or move…
/r/MensRights22/10/22 01:53 PM
9

"They want men to do all this and never make a mistake or make them uncomfortable." This has always been true, way before any of this 'toxic masculinity' discussion made it all even more confusing. Go too slow, or especially too fast, and it's game over. It doesn't have to even be physical contact. Just calling/texting too often or not enough can be a deal breaker. So really, things now aren't as different as you think. I don't have the answer, but I do know one thing: people, including women, p…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:06 PM
2

I replied and now see that this post has been removed. F*ck the mods.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:50 PM
0

It's true. Their slogan is "for the cure" but their stated objective is awareness. Technically these fundraisers count as raising awareness, so if all they do is endless fundraisers, they've met their stated objective. They prey on people who want to contribute to the common good and feel good about themselves for being a good person. Most people don't have the ability to do lab research, so if all you can do to contribute is walk in circles, you do that. And then convince yourself that you're m…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:42 PM
3

Point well taken. Canada is especially egregious (think Dave Foley interview with Joe Rogan). It's even worse than your comment, as the initial ruling was $50K per month FOR LIFE. So, this is worth thinking about, how involved you would want to be in a relationship. Would staying over weekends count as cohabitation in the eyes of a judge?
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:34 PM
63

There's nothing wrong with MGTOW. However, people have a wide variety of ideas of what MGTOW means, even men who identify as MGTOW. Women too can't agree on a definition. Being for, against, or neutral on MGTOW depends on how it effects you personally. Every definition of MGTOW limits how women can benefit from men in one way or another. Men who refuse all romance with women leave no options. Other MGTOW men will date women, but won't live with them, marry them, or have kids with them. Women can…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:42 PM
13

No means no, except when it doesn't
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/21 02:20 PM
2

Every decision has an opportunity cost. Sure, you could settle down with a woman so she can take care of you in your old age. On the other hand, she could have her own medical problems and drain your retirement fund paying for it. There is no magic best choice.
/r/MGTOW226/10/20 12:44 PM
2

Feel free to comment and criticize: https://www.quora.com/Why-is-MGTOW-growing-in-popularity/answer/Tom-Barnum
/r/MGTOW225/09/20 02:31 AM
4

Link to article
/r/PussyPass03/02/19 05:08 AM
43

Good points made here. No question that some people are more dangerous or a high flight risk and should have a higher bail. My question is should there be a 100X spread in the difference?
/r/PussyPass03/02/19 04:13 AM
123

Guys who choose not to fight back, that is your choice, but at least defend yourself. Block punches and dodge. You don't have to be a literal punching bag. Even this guy just took it at first.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 01:46 PM
12

You can, of course, have no sex or even no physical contact and still be falsely accused. When that happens, you will have no documented consent to defend yourself. Colleges understand their pocketbooks, that's where you have to hit them. If they are unwilling to have a written policy guarantying all students full due process, leave. Don't give them another dollar more than you have to. Meanwhile, do what you can to protect yourself. Record your conversations with women at parties, on dates. etc…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 12:23 AM
1

She reasoned this out. I can't see her meeting the legal definition of insanity.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:38 AM
-5

Yeah, I'm imagining what it would be like to patiently wait at the back of the intersection for traffic to clear while you've got a line of angry, impatient drivers behind you. Probably get a couple of slugs in the back of the head. No thanks.
/r/PussyPass30/06/17 06:14 PM
12

It reminds me of the Dave Foley interview with Joe Rogan (for the one or two out there who haven't seen this. This is totally believable.
/r/PussyPass29/04/17 04:29 PM
5

Men, let it go. They're not your type, or any male's type. So what. Move one. Nothing to see here.
/r/PussyPass28/04/17 12:11 AM
1

Yes, I've seen this correlation too. Not just stay-at-home women, but even working women living far above the lifestyle they could afford on their own paycheck.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/17 11:50 PM
3

Professor: "Words mean what I say they mean, not what the dictionary says they mean."
/r/MensRights31/03/17 06:13 PM
2

It's like a person can't make a simple statement on Reddit without being eviscerated for it. We get it, the glass isn't 90% empty, it's 10% full with you.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:32 PM
3

So what's your take on this? Is it Muslim gangs doing this against native Brit gangs, or doing it against the general population, or both?
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:15 PM
13

from The Guardian. It doesn't talk about who or what groups are doing the acid throwing. It doesn't seem like they are targeting Muslims. I don't know what to make of this, but it doesn't seem to be gang-on-gang violence. Six in 10 of all victims were male, while 71% described their ethnic origin as white British, the figures show (white British, according to the 2011 census, accounts for 80% of the British population in England and Wales). Analysis of the data also reveals a trend which surpris…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:52 PM
3

she's knowledgeable She knows where everyone and their families live and they don't want to get their houses firebombed while they sleep.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:34 PM
2

You're right, but let me clarify. After she's there long enough so that anyone paying attention can tell she's incompetent, and nothing is done, it becomes her manager's fault for allowing it to continue. Then again, they hired her with no experience and obviously didn't vet her capabilities, so it'd a double fault for her manager.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:26 AM
11

This is ultimately an issue with her manager not doing their job, not with her.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 02:43 AM
4

Maybe the reason the feedback is vague is because of the possibility of a negative reaction. It's a survival tool.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 02:40 AM
3

This is significant info. If it hadn't been this, it would have been something else.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 10:19 PM
7

Hell, a lot of black guys don't want to date black women either, so what's the problem? At my office it's the women that are the problem. They go to management in a heartbeat for everything. Not all the women do this, but the population that does do this is 100% women.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 10:09 PM
1

It doesn't even have to be about sex. It's an issue of the head vs. the heart. A woman may choose to be with you because her head tells her that logically you are a good catch and worth the effort. But if her heart wants something that you can't give her, eventually the relationship will wither. The heart wants what the heart wants, and if you can't give her the tingles, either sexually or non-sexually, it's not going to work out. I am going to somehow program myself to become physically and men…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 02:33 AM
1

This is China, where there are way more men than women. I'll bet there are plenty of guys that are pretty desperate and open to being conned.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:48 AM
7

First, I'm sick of this ultra sensitivity. Everybody is offended by everything. The standard rule in comedy is that you get to make jokes at the expense of the group you belong to. A black standup can make slavery jokes. It doesn't mean that the comedian condones or trivializes slavery. It would mean that if I, a white guy, tried the same thing. For the same reason, if a guy wore Lena's costume, it wouldn't work. Not because he's a guy, but because Standard Comedy Rule. I'm glad her face is cove…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:22 AM
1

I think you're asking the wrong question. You should be asking if the laws that Roe v. Wade overturned were a good decision from a constitutional perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/16 01:50 AM
3

Proving innocence is often impossible. Usually the best you can hope for in these cases is not enough evidence to support the accusation (he said/she said). There must have been some hard evidence, like the accused could prove they weren't there, or her phone records proved she wasn't there.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/16 11:39 PM
1

What you said is basically true for Europe, but not quite as extreme as you say. Yes, latitude matters a lot. Take London as an example. Today the sun is high enough to get Vitamin D production from 11:30 am - 3:30 pm. Not a big window, but if you're out in shorts and a t-shirt, you can get a good dose of Vitamin D in even 15 minutes. By mid-August, that window shrinks to noon - 2pm; by September that window is gone. So, you're talking about 7 months out of the year without the ability to create…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/16 04:37 PM
-1

Actually, it's the ozone layer that absorbs the UV-B rays when the sun is below 50 degrees on the horizon. The UV-B rays are what your skin uses to make Vitamin D. If you live in the northern 2/3 of the USA or most of Europe: Winter - no Vitamin D created Spring/Fall - midday sun needed Excess Vitamin D is stored in your fat, so if you get a lot of sun in the summer and fall, it can get you through most of the winter. But Vitamin D is pretty inexpensive and cheap insurance. Take it during the wi…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/16 12:54 PM
6

This. No need to read further.
/r/askTRP25/05/16 12:25 AM
16

If multiple witnesses isn't enough, there is nothing that will protect you from this. If I were a male student here, I would leave that school. If it can happen to Tim, it can happen to you.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:45 AM
9

Women have always wanted to marry "up" for financial security. These days, with more women getting degrees, non-degreed women can't compete landing a guy with a degree. In 1960, if a women couldn't land a college guy or a skilled labor guy, she could at least get a guy with a well-paying factory job. They could raise a family on one income, had job security, and could look forward to a decent retirement pension. These days, unskilled worker guy is not such a great catch. He's two paychecks from …
/r/MensRights26/03/16 01:36 AM
5

You're only a creep and rapist if you're not good looking enough.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 02:43 PM
3

Just once I'd like to see it go down like this: "Your sentence is 60 days. However, for the rest of your life, anyone convicted of killing you for any reason will only get 60 days."
/r/PussyPass27/02/16 08:47 PM
2

I guess we have a new category now, "consensual rape."
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:41 AM
6

I guess the trick is to act so perverted and disgusting that she will break it off for you.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:34 AM
4

In an alternate universe: "I'm not patronizing you because you're a woman, I'm patronizing you because you're clueless."
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/16 01:32 AM
3

This is not new. I remember reading an article maybe 15 years ago where several fathers were interviewed who would take their daughters to the park to play. They all said they had stopped because they got tired of having the police called on them. Thinking they were abductors doesn't even make sense. What abductor would stay around the park playing with their abductee? I personally don't run into this. Maybe I'm lucky and just live in an area that is less paranoid. That said, this is a real prob…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:47 PM
8

At the top of his Instagram page, Melo writes: 'How Good It Feel Knowing That I Will Be Millionaire And Successful Forever.' I'll bet you a dollar he's in one of those MLM scams (Amway, Herbalife). So basically, delusional.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/16 02:24 AM
4

And yet there are males who continue to attend this college. Blows my mind (pun indended).
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 03:29 PM
3

Nice guy is sometimes rebound guy. She's fresh off dating a jerk, who didn't treat her well. She's determined to find a guy who treats her right. For a brief moment, she's thinking with her head. She finds nice guy, likes it for awhile, but eventually finds that he just doesn't give her the tingles, she's bored. In the end, nice guy is just a rest stop in the highway of her life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 02:01 PM
0

It's all about respect. The nice guy may have qualities that the woman likes, that attracts her to him, but in the end, for some women, they won't respect the nice guy. Without respect, you have nothing. None of his other qualities can make up for lack of respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 01:56 PM
-8

I know that even if a girl is top-shelf relationship material, there's a switch inside her that can flip and make her the opposite of the very woman you came to value. If you take away only one sentence from this thread, this is it. My issue with AWALT has been that I don't think it is 99.9% of women, as OP has stated. Is it 80%? 60%? 40%? Hell, I don't know, but I do know plenty of women acquaintances who just do not seem to have AWALT in them. That said, I realize that there is NO WAY to tell …
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 01:46 AM
3

It's so cute that these students are so emotional about such important issues. (Fuck global warming, or drones killing innocents, or other real issues. I'm offended that you violated my safe space by telling me that I couldn't dress up in blackface).
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:45 AM
2

The only way to control this behavior is with boundaries. This may or may not be possible depending on the structure of your company and how your department fits into the company. You don't seem to have boundaries right now. If your boss is playing good cop, he is acknowledging and reinforcing their bad behavior. Both of you need to agree to put the brakes on this behavior. If that isn't possible for whatever reason, nothing will change. You have to decide if it's worth it to stick around.
/r/askTRP20/09/15 02:49 AM
1

I recently read a case in North Carolina of an adulterer woman who got alimony. North Carolina has a similar law. Family courts are the wild west. It seems judges can rule any way they want in what they perceive as "fairness," even counter to the law. Unless you've got enough money to fund a really good lawyer and appeals, this may be no protection at all.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 04:25 PM
4

maintaining the standard of living that the children are accustomed to (kids to Mom): What the hell IS this crap? Mom: I only got a partial check this month, so we're forced to drink domestic bottled water. Kid: (speed dialing CPS) Fuck this!
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:46 PM
2

Videotaping all encounters is an absolute minimum. Even that is not a guarantee (she can claim she consented that night but didn’t another night that wasn’t taped). Keep all videotapes at least as long as the statute of limitations. Women can and do change their minds later. Apparently regret rape is now a thing. Limiting dates to off-campus women is no protection. I don’t think you have to be a student to report a false incident to the school. Too many guys have the “it can’t happen to me” atti…
/r/askTRP12/08/15 06:02 PM
8

I worked for the same company. Let me add another point that is TRP-worthy. I was told many many times by married men that I should never get married. (Always out of earshot of the family, of course). This was always completely unsolicited advice, and off topic of the conversation (the sales pitch). Seemed like good advice. Who else would know better?
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 03:19 AM
3

As you get older, you realize how pointless it is to try to change someone's mind who is so emotionally invested in their position. I usually just walk away or say something like, "when you have something intelligent and logical to say in your argument, let me know." With not caring comes the freedom to be a little less perfect in your behavior, so something like this might be fun to say, "when you have something intelligent and logical to say in your argument, you know, like a man, let me know.…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:15 PM
5

Managing well is a skill. Hiring the right people, getting the most out of them, and getting them to want to stick around takes skill Most managers are mediocre or worse, much worse. A person clearly doesn't have to be competent to become a manager. So you ask why you're not a manager. There's no reason you can't be one if you look hard enough. You don't have to be good at it to get the job. Why do you want to be a restaurant manager anyway? You'll just end up working 70-80 hours a week for a me…
/r/askTRP28/06/15 01:58 AM
2

Imagine the kids of the male protesters stumbling onto this video and asking, "Daddy, why were you such a pussy back then?"
/r/MensRights07/06/15 12:46 AM
6

You have a valid point. It's Brooklyn. I'm sure they can find a bunch of jurors who feel oppressed and want to stick it to the man. Never mind that it's them, the taxpayers, that will foot the bill.
/r/PussyPass24/05/15 08:20 PM
-1

I'm surprised she found a lawyer that would take this case. Even lawyers have standards don't want to waste their time on a case they can't win.
/r/PussyPass24/05/15 02:47 PM
3

With all this new evidence, even if they continue to go to trial, he should be released with no bail until trial.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:00 PM
1

First, the guy's a douche. Drop him. Second, don't sweat that he copied your idea. Good ideas are a dime a dozen. It's the execution that matters most. If you can execute, then he is no competition and no threat to you. Third, even if he claims he created the idea, a business idea is not legally protectable, so he can't go after you. He might badmouth you, but your web site will speak for itself. Not an issue. Ignore him, execute your idea, enjoy your success, and when you have beaten him and he…
/r/askTRP18/05/15 04:40 PM
26

Here in America, if this woman has any assets or insurance, there are lawyers who would be happy to take this case on a contingency basis. And not just sue this woman, but anyone else who commented negatively on this post or threatened him. This damage to his reputation is real. Even if he is proven innocent beyond any doubt, his name is associated with the crime in people's minds.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:21 PM
9

Also the one in North Carolina recently where the wife divorced the man, gets a ton of alimony (even though alimony for cheaters is specifically forbidden in NC), took the house the husband inherited, leaving the man penniless and homeless. Family law seems to be totally up to the whim of the judge, not based on case law. It usually seems to go in favor of the woman.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:51 PM
4

From the male perspective, we're talking about a rational decision here, weighing the upside and downside. As an example, let's say you decide to go to an ice cream store that has three flavors. One flavor will taste amazing. One will be OK. The third has poison in it that will debilitate you for years. Do you go to that store? Rationally, no. The argument here is that you have alternatives, you could get something other than a cone that lacks the downside risk, or not eat ice cream.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:44 PM
22

Everything you say is right, and the article is mostly right. I don’t think, however, that this totally explains fewer marriages. Maybe it’s a third of the cases. Most guys have not thought about this stuff and are no smarter now than years ago when the marriage rate was higher. I think there are multiple reasons, different reasons for different people. I’m going to theorize on a few: 1- A generation has grown up with divorce as the norm. If you’re in your 20s, you’ve seen divorce as common. Eit…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 06:39 PM
52

You forgot the one where the guy had been divorced for 25 years and his ex sued him for alimony and won. After the divorce, it may never end.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 05:49 PM
1

Maybe your son can "red pill" her into changing, but I wouldn't bet the farm on that. I'd try to convince him to wait a couple of years to find out. If she backs down on this one point, that's no proof of anything. Maybe she's wised up, or maybe she's just changing tactics to get what she wants.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 01:59 AM
1

Sure, marriage can work with two exceptional people who continue to improve. One person cannot compensate for the flaws of another, though. You can do everything right, try to maintain a lifetime of game, but if your partner wants out, it's game over. That said, congrats on your success and your focus. Quite an accomplishment.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 01:58 PM
6

It's a valid concern, and there are legal ways to prevent that from happening. Anyone who wants to keep assets in the family has to take action to make that happen. Picture this scenario: 1- You inherit the house. 2- You die, your wife gets the house. 3- Your wife remarries, then dies. 4- Surviving husband gets all your stuff, your kids get nothing. I read a news article once that was like this, but with song royalties. The royalties were owned, through inheritance, by the daughter of the replac…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 02:58 AM
6

Inheritance is not normally part of marital assets. Even if the house were put in both their names, it wouldn't take a top-notch lawyer to get the house sold and the proceeds split. Ten years alimony for a marriage of less than two years is beyond insane. Your buddy must have had the worst lawyer in town, or no lawyer, and just left it up to the judge. Unless there is more to this story, it seems pretty hopeful for an appeal. Edit: In North Carolina, you can’t get alimony if you had an affair.. …
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 02:34 AM
3

And yet, I've read about Americans turned away at the border for decades-old DUI/OWIs. Interesting.
/r/PussyPass02/04/15 08:36 PM
9

When women try to blame this on men and the 'system' keeping them from pursuing math and science, point out that 80% of the teachers for grade and middle school are women, and 60+% of the high school teachers are women (USA). So basically, during the girls formative years, when interest in math and science needs to be seeded, young girls have plenty of female teachers who can influence/steer them into hard sciences. And lets not forget about Mom. She has that opportunity also.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:51 PM
14

You remove that and there is nothing stopping governments, people, even businesses from exploiting literally everything. You mean like the Patriot act, civil asset forfeitures, warrantless searches? This is just the next thing destroying democracy. We must keep speaking out against all of this until it goes away.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:33 PM
5

I agree with what others have said. This is not a good long term plan. But, I do think this is an excellent short-term plan. Ease into the divorce. Give yourself a couple of years to sock away some cash. If you haven't already, start paying all the bills, preferably electronically. You'll know that money is going to essentials. Give the wife an allowance just enough to take care of food and day-to-day expenses. At the very least, she won't also be stashing away large sums of your cash. Perhaps d…
/r/askTRP23/02/15 09:46 PM
6

At the State level, this sounds like it would be unconstitutional. But at the corporate level, you make a good point. Again, trying to view this from the point of a male hiring manager, it still would effect the hiring process, as my own self-preservation would factor significantly into the hiring decision. Even if I was forced by corporate to fill a position with a female, my due diligence on her character, activities and beliefs would be extensive. If I could not uncover significant informatio…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 10:25 PM
18

If that happens, what rational hiring male would hire a female, knowing that down the road, if they get pissed off at you for any reason, they can destroy your life with an accusation.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:55 PM
17

Every woman I've seen use this quote has been either mentally unstable, a recovering alcoholic/drug addict, had self-esteem issues, or all of the above. Without fail. It's like they wear their faults on their sleeve as a badge of honor, which takes much less effort than fixing themselves.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 03:02 PM
4

A new industry is born: Nookie Notary
/r/PussyPass04/02/15 10:19 PM
7

Kind of begs the question, how bad would her crime have to be for this guy to not forgive her? I'm guessing between severed penis and beheading.
/r/PussyPass22/01/15 05:16 PM
1

I spend HOURS patiently trying to reason with her and correct her skewed version of reality. Clearly, every thing you say is like talking in a foreign language. It doesn't register with her. So, stop it. You're speaking logic to a person who is an emotional infant, who is pure need. Pure need only understands what is needed. Sometimes I feel she is basically using me as her way of getting the emotional drugs she needs People with a hole in their heart that big are NEVER sated. There is no amount…
/r/MensRights01/01/15 07:13 PM
2

There's nothing wrong with developing a rapport with them. It's a lot easier to get through the day with people who like you, and people who like you will more often have your back. That said, do not confuse friendliness with friendship. You must remember that these coworkers are not your friends. You may be tempted to let your guard down with someone you have a strong rapport with, either sharing personal information or worse, sharing a complaint about the business. No matter how well you get a…
/r/askTRP23/12/14 04:33 AM
1

Did you break up with her, and did she pull this right after you broke it off?
/r/MensRights14/12/14 01:16 PM
1

In any broad-based group, like a political party, you're not going to agree with a lot of the people, no matter what side you're on. It ends up that you don't pick the side you agree with, you pick the side you disagree with less. If you're not finding things to disagree with, you're not thinking. Keep thinking and disagreeing.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 05:00 PM
4

for sexually assaulting my girlfriend before we were dating. So, her claim is that she was assaulted by you 3 times. So, after the first assault, she then put herself in a position to be assaulted by you two more times? She then decided to be your girlfriend? This already doesn't pass the smell test, and I don't even know the details. Was your ex-gf ever asked why she supposedly made this decision? I bet not. This alone would seem to validate that you were not given a fair hearing, and may provi…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 04:52 PM
6

CNN interview: The interviewer, Carol Costello, uses classic fallacies of logic and misdirection to try to redefine the argument into her own terms. A good interviewer should draw out the interviewee, asking questions to reveal their position. Carol Costello has no business being an interviewer. Susan Patton, at first, did a good job of deflecting this misdirection. When she was making a point about women who get a but drunk and have regret sex as not being real rape, Costello tried to redefine …
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 04:28 PM
2

In related news, in the UK, the claimed age of menopause has immediately risen from 50 to 65.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:25 PM
1

I have to ask, if your focus on winning is not making you happy, why do you keep doing it? Why not try a different way of thinking that might make you happy? Also, your focus does not seem to be to win, it's to not lose; a subtle but significant difference. As to keeping track of rejections, most of the time this is pointless and masochistic. Many rejections are just bad timing and are not personal (she's just out of a relationship/just starting one/not in the mood/preoccupied with other things/…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 04:59 AM
0

It's hard enough to have a rational discourse with many people. If you think you're going to accomplish this with the "loud and proud" type, you're just setting yourself up for failure.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:40 AM
2

I can see your point, because, well, it's basically true. He is a wimp. However, I'm going to cut him some slack. Maybe he's always been a wimp, or maybe she just drove him to it. Have you ever been with a crazy train like her, where if you say anything, even the right thing, it makes them madder? A person can become a wimp as a survival tactic. I've seen it in both men and women.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 08:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter