TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chosimab0001 Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by chosimab0001 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:36 PM
1

You're right. I didn't realize that 'the game' you were referring to was just 'communication'. That's a far bigger picture than I was attempting to address. In this picture, it's impossible not to play the game. The types of people who play The God Game believe themselves gods (i.e. psychopaths, 1%ers, Silicon Valley Techno-brats, Wall Street Executives, Systems Administrators, Police Officers, Judges, Government Bureaucrats, Legislative Aides, Middle Managers, Religious Leaders, etc.) The only …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:11 PM
1

I still believe that my earlier scenario would produce all three of those things. Really, ANYTHING that you say to someone has a chance to bring one of those three results. For example, I would imagine that after going to several funerals, I wouldn't ALWAYS get the expected result. Some would be off the wall ("I don't think he's really dead") , some would be unexpected (a good laugh), and some would be expected (anger towards me for disrespect). I guess what I'm saying is that it would be imposs…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:40 PM
2

So the winning condition of this 'game' is to be able to produce an expected response? So I can be the champion of this game by going into funerals and yelling "Way to die, shithead." producing the expected response of anger or confusion? That seems like an incredibly small victory. I understand that's a really simple example, but you claimed that this was a game of such immense complexity the very idea that the game even exists will be unbelievable to most of you. which I feel it is not. Even i…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:12 PM
-1

I've seen this argument many times. I think the question at it's core is "At what point is someone REALLY a victim." I'm all for teaching people to fight for themselves, and to be aware of the best path to take, but most times we're in situations where the correct path is unclear or even invisible when we're in the middle of it all. If we had the privilege of hindsight BEFORE a rough situation occurred, there's little doubt that we would opt out of the 'smartest' 'easiest' path, and instead choo…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:35 PM
1

LOL characters are excessive because that is the style, dudes with huge muscles and chisled jaws and chicks with curves and tits. Its less sexual marketing and more an artistic expression I completely agree. I would also like to add that not ALL characters in League have overly exaggerated sex appeal. Just look at Teemo, Tristana, Jinx, Kayle, Blitzcrank, Heimerdinger, Xerath, and Ezreal. There's more I'm sure, but those were the champions I could think of off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:35 PM
3

So what I am getting at is are feminists creating a problem by stating a problem exists? I've wondered about it before, and It's been from people who subscribe to things not limited to feminism. For example, say that I paint a picture of the sunrise. During the art show, someone comes clamoring to the curator saying "That picture should be taken down! It might make people want to murder anyone that sees it!" Up until this point, no one has perceived my sunrise picture as a murderous masterpiece …
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:28 PM
6

I honestly don't have any specific or 'famous' examples that would reveal any misandry, but I can't see how you could hold both of those views at the same time. What I mean is, say I had a standard for beauty. This standard is that people with black hair, and 3 tatoos, and a BMI of 18.5 are beautiful. If you don't meet the standard, you just aren't beautiful. Now, obviously that's not how I define beauty, but if I proactively held to that standard (even going as far as to telling people who don'…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:29 PM
0

I'm just baffled that there's still this idea that once you find someone attractive, then your motivations must lead to having sex with them. Who cares if there was an attraction there? Who cares if he SUPER wanted to have sex with her in the immediate future? In no way does that have anything to do saying "Good Morning" to a passerby and immediately being portrayed as a pervert. If I wasn't allowed to be friendly to people that I found attractive, I would be a sad and lonely person. The point I…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:40 PM
2

I agree that what each individual deems 'sexy' is largely culture based, but the desire for sex is on some level, biologically driven. Sure, the things about people that I may find attractive may be different than another person's, but the fact that we still desire for sexual experiences with those people, can be pointed to our shared biology. I'm certainly not disagreeing with your views on sexuality, but I wanted to point out that there is a difference between 'sexuality' and 'desire for sex'.…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 03:53 PM
1

Interesting read. Thanks for putting in the time and effort into that article. It's certainly appreciated. Was going to leave a comment on the actual hub, but no new comments were being accepted.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 03:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter