TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chrisTHEayers Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by chrisTHEayers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Alright we'll call it there then, I agree, this is all a big mess that could be done better, lol. Gotta love arguing on reddit :p
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 11:50 PM
1

I think I get how youre reading it, so let me summarize how I see it, and what I think he was trying to say: Violence should not be the go-to response, but if it happens, how "fair" is that? A fit dude retaliates when another fit dude hits him. Seems like a "fair" response. Same damage is probably done to each party. Note this does not mean it is a good or an okay response. Skip the baby example and go to a kid hitting you. If you bit back, it certainly seems less fair. Your difference in physic…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 11:01 PM
1

Everyone is completely missing your point, lol
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 10:20 PM
1

Well then we are reading his comment differently. I'm not sure how you can see that as being his argument, though, if he specifically said "proportionate response". That implies different situations require different solutions, proportionate to the problem. That's not saying you should act the same way in every situation, by using the standard of a baby. If that was what he was saying, then I agree with you, that's a ridiculous situation to base all other responses on
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 10:17 PM
1

I agree you can have ridiculous extremes, and the less ridiculous, the more beneficial it will be to your argument. I don't think that's the case here, not for me at least. Even thinking about it now, a baby could bite you, should you bite it back? This is beside the point. I originally responded to that guy to say he's missing the point, suggesting op meant that we should treat women like babies, when I thought it was fairly obvious his point was that responding in kind does not carry the same …
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 09:53 PM
1

I'm saying it didn't. I just easily came up with two situations that are more believable based on the extreme he chose. If you cant come up with something similarly, you either have a very weak imagination, or you are caught up on a detail and refusing to acknowledge the point he is actually trying to make.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 09:24 PM
-6

okay, so your problem is with the extreme he chose, because it doesn't sound realistic? Well let me do what I'm talking about and pick something less extreme. How about not a baby but a 8 year old punk that comes up and hits you in the nuts because he thinks it's funny? No? Too unrealistic? Okay how about a teenager that chucks a ball at you to show off to his friends? Still too far off? The point is you can think of any number of situations between the extremes, some more realistic than others,…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 09:19 PM
-8

his point was proportionate response. He contrasted to extremes: retaliating to your physical equal and retaliating to someone obviously inferior If you would act differently in each extreme, then when you are in the middle ground the answer is not clear cut. The middle ground here would be real life situations.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 08:58 PM
-13

He was giving an extreme example to show it's not a black and white issue. But good job missing the point
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 08:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter