TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

chubby_leenock_hugs Archive

View 0 posts and 153 comments by chubby_leenock_hugs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, not really, that's already how it typically works except sex-segregated. In amateur competitive sports you just have like 8 or so tiered leagues and the reward for finishing top of the league is a promotion to a higher league. I used to play competitive sports like this in my youth and like most sports there was a female league and a unisex league with no male specific league but the female league was a barren wasteland because most clubs did not have enough female players to create a decent…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 02:29 PM
1

Yeah I got that too like in Star Trek they had the first "gay character" right and I remember a discussin on r/startrek where some people didn't get it because the only scene that established it was one male character stroking the face of another and saying "I love you" or something like that. In one comment train they eventually figured out that the people who didn't get it all had in common that they weren't American and the conclusion was that in the US males are so afraid of showing each oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 01:49 PM
1

Netherlands. I kind of feel that this entire sub and discussion is an American thing you know. Like the word "date" is actually not translatable into Dutch because people here don't really go on "dates" and when they do they use the English word "date" as it's a really new thing mostly imported from the US that a lot of people still think is very weird and a lot of people say "I do not go on dates and do this new date business; it's really dumb."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 01:41 PM
2

I've truth be told never met these males who are so fragile about their masculinity in real life but I see all these weird things on reddit. Might be a cultural thing. I sometimes read things on the internet that North American people are taken aback by how comfortable west-European males are from their perspective being what they consider "feminine".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 01:33 PM
1

Ehh, do you have any reference to this because I can find nothing in the rules which don't seem to go out of its way to even define this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 09:34 AM
1

Repeating the same argument after I point out you switch and drop it as it suits you doesn't suddenly make it less inconsistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:54 AM
1

Yeah, when you don't you just come with "cognitive dissonance"; don't reply or defeat your own arugment of "woman is biological" when you exclude people who are biologically female but don't buy into this whole identity shtick.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:48 AM
0

As I said in another reply: there are more people born with a vulva and not XX than there are MtF transsexuals so brushing it away as "an edge case" in a topic that is about edge cases doesn't really fly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:28 AM
1

What's the definition of "sport" here?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:27 AM
1

Yeah like I said, you want both pieces of the pie. First your entire OP is spent on defining "woman" as biological but now it's suddnely about gender identity when someone disagres. You're not interested in addressing because you wanted a circlejerk and hoped for people to agree with you but you found out that many don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:26 AM
2

I'm personally just opposed to sex segregation, nation segregation, age segregation and whatever in sports. Throw them all in one giant pool, have a league system where if you finish top of your league you promote to a highe league to ensure that people face competition of a relatively even level and that's it. Yeah that will mean that males face females but since there is a league system in play the best female in the world will just face something like the #800 male in the world which is an ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:07 AM
0

As I said there is no single consistent social definition either. It's utterly subjective and different people have different definitions and different authorities also do. For every single DSM that is released there is such an utterly hot debate within the psychiatric community on what to classify and declassify as a disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:05 AM
3

Actually it isn't. The problem is that athletes do not have "a normal range" surprise surprise that both male and female athletes tend to have a higher than average testosterone level for their sex—is anyone surprised by this? The cutoff range is completely arbitrary; there is no good way to decide it and different organizations come up with different cutoffs because it's really just wet fingerwork.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:04 AM
4

What OP basically seems to be doing here is soliciting a concurrent opinion from "women" because apparently that makes it weigh more and when many of them disagree OP finds ways to dismiss it. It's a complete one-way street of "Hah, see, a WOMAN said it too!" when there's agreement but OP finds ways where it doesn't count when one disagrees. I find OP's response to me to be most ironic. OP's entire OP echoes "being a woman is defined by the genitals you are born with, not what you identify as" a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 07:01 AM
3

You raise an interesting point. It seems like pretty much all the males in this sub are super into their gender identity and roles but with the females it's about 50/50 split whether they give a damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:55 AM
2

That doesn't change that it quickly becomes impossible to actually find an objective, testable definition of "abnormal" or "disorder".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:53 AM
3

Where do you define "abnormal"? Only 1% of people has red hair, is that abnormal? What is defined as abnormal certainly hasn't much do with frequency because a great many things that are not "abnormal" have a lower frequency than many things that are. The distinction between "abnormal" and "normal" is not a scientific one: it's a social one and on top of that different experts differ on what they consider 'abnormal' and various things that were once diseases got declassified or reclassified pure…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:49 AM
2

Well it's going to be hard to find a definition of "men" and "genetically normal". You can't easily partition human beings into "male", "female", and "intersex"; it's hard to point out where the line lies. like all biological taxonomy: it's largely bullshit and not rigorous. Mankind's foolish attempts to try to create a discrete partition into a continuum has never worked well for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:39 AM
1

I'm pretty sure the Q4W and Q4M posts on this sub are with regards to biology, not social identity bullshit. edit: Besides your post strongly echoes an opinion that you believe it's defined by biology but now when someone disagrees with you you suddenly fall back to gender identity? So to be clear in your opinion if I were biologically male but "considered myself a woman" I could reply? because I feel that in that case you would again claim that I was excluded due to not being biologically femal…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:37 AM
3

It's a way to sound scientific with a secondary school understanding of human sex determination without understanding how complex it is. (Hint: There are more people born with both a vulva and a Y chromosome than there are MtF transsexuals.). Human sex determination is not completely mapped at this point and there are still cases where the phenotype developed in such a way that people can't really explain when analysing the genes yet. But the big advancement is the SRY gene which normally sits o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:30 AM
1

What if they're born with a Y chromosome but a vulva and a womb and never find out they have a Y chromosome until they start to reproduce and want to know why they are sterile or in fact are fertile enough to reproduce and never find out at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:23 AM
1

Are they women? I don't "consider" anyone to "be" a "woman". It's a useless identity label and I do not deal in those. I consider people who don't have a womb to not have a womb and I don't care much if people have a womb Do you think you'd be as likely to befriend them as a person who was born female? Why or why not. I'm unlikely to befriend people in general and I sure as hell haven't met enough of them to make any reasonable statistical guess as to that and apart from that it's entirely possi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:22 AM
2

I don't nag; I mostly just remind people for months that they made a grammatical error and rub it in; that's different. "Remember that one time you actually used "who" as an object instead of "whom", buaahhaha, so bourgeois, ahahaha, sucker!"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 05:17 AM
1

I don't care per se; I care about that they don't have a penis; I want my friends to have a penis or at least the ones I have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 02:26 AM
1

What definition of "control" does this graph use?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 09:55 AM
1

Very inventive/curious and very challenging/detached; I do not care about the other three.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 09:48 AM
1

Zero—which is kind of annoying since they're usually the ones with phalli which are conspicuously absent from my friend-circle. edit: I think asking for the ratio is more interesting than the absolute number by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 09:47 AM
2

Well I would hate to be "cherished"; I guess I enjoy being respected in the "hated, but respected" kind of way, not necessarily with the hatred but I mean respected in the sense of being taken seriously and possibly feared not in sense of being treated politely with nice words. The other two I don't really care about either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 02:41 PM
1

You see no reason why personal items should be shared in a marriage? Sure, do it like roommates and label your yogurt. No, I said I see no reason why every single item you possess should be shared in a marriage. As I said the things you want to share should be actively put up for it but the current system is that every single item is. Generally, inheritances are not subject to equitable distribution because, by law, inheritances are not considered marital property. Instead, inheritances are trea…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 05:55 AM
0

I get it if one person comes into a marriage with significant assets. But most assets are accumulated during marriage, not inherited these days and most household expenses are paid from joint accounts. And yes, the mortgage company takes checks from joint accounts to pay for a mortgage in one persons name And I'm saying you should independently arrange that for all assets you want shared rather than this binary deal of "every asset is shared or none of them are" If you want to make your house sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 04:57 AM
1

If the house is registered to one individual and another individual "pays the mortgage" the only way to do that is for one individual to gift the money to the other who then pays the mortgage because obviously the bank checks where the money comes from and they won't just let a random account "pay the mortgage" without sounding some bells. So in that case the second individual has gifted the first one money; if that is for the purpose of paying the mortgage I would obviously say "I'm not going t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 04:21 AM
1

And you can move whatever you use for common households into the third legal person so I don't see the problem there. But the idea that everything automatically even stuff that were one person's before the marriage are shared property is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 03:54 AM
5

There is a difference between "not liking" and "this is bullshit and shouldn't exist"; I realize taxes exist for the common good and all; I might not like it but I don't think it shou;dn't exist altogether. I think marriage and shared property like that is a ridiculous construct that dates from a time long gone and should be abolished altogether. if people want to somehow share property I think they should create a third legal person in some way which they both have shared ownership of and move …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 03:33 AM
1

"mad"? I don't get mad at anything that's not my parent but I think marriage is bullshit and property that is not liquid should not be shared. The only time it makes sense for multiple individuals to share property is when they are joint owners of a company whose assets are liquid and can thus be evenly distributed amongst them. You can easily say you both own half of the company in terms of shares but half of a TV? How does that even work; the problem with a TV is if you cut it in half both par…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 03:25 AM
1

Well that was my original argument and the point of this discussion wasn't it? That there is no concrete unified definable way how "chad" looks. My original line was: The problem is that the chad hypothesis basically claims there is a specific concrete type of male that all females go for Which you at the time seemed to argue against but you seem to have revised your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 03:15 AM
1

you keep thinking there is a specific look That is my point; there is no "specific look" but people keep acting like there is. People keep acting like there are some specific features a chad has beyond "just being attractive", some specific objective features like "square jaw" or "blue eyes" but it doesn't seem to be the case at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 02:41 AM
1

massive social skills, outgoing personality, good looking. If you don't have all 3, you can never be chad. None of those things are concrete; the problem is that everyone has a different subjective opinion of what that constitutes and it just displaces the problem. Objective things are "black hair', "sharp jawline", "above 1.90m" but the things you mentioned are basically just subjective words like "good" Also you know how there is that okcupid study that said women find 80% of the men unattract…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 01:22 AM
1

The problem is that no one defines what a chad actually looks like and how it acts specifically. The problem is that the chad hypothesis basically claims there is a specific concrete type of male that all females go for but no one bothers to explicitly define it beyond "really attractive" because if you were to actually define it that would sooner lead to people disagreeing on what this type is and unmask it as nonexistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 12:24 AM
2

No the discussion was about abs from the start? The top level post I made quoted OP about abs and from that point on it was always about abs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 11:27 AM
1

I have never seen a stranger on the street I found attractive; I wouldn't know what the percentage is though but about once per 3-5 weeks I see someone whom I find "aesthetic"; I'm unsure what percentage of people that would be since I don't erally count that; it's entirely possible that there are more aesthetic people but I just didn't notice since I'm not usually looking around very well.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 08:40 AM
5

Dude, bodybuilding didn't exist before the 1850s and when it started it looked nothing like it did today. this is what bodybuilders looked like in the 1990s and this is what actual strength athletes look like. You don't get "visible abs" by having strong muscules; you get them by reducing body fat percentage. The people who partake in body building competitions even starve and dehydrate themselves in the weak leading to the competition to further gain definition which of course does nothing to i…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 08:05 AM
0

Just look at the abs of the best Tennis Player ever. here are some bodies of olympic athletes the only one with abs is the basketball player in the centre.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 07:20 AM
0

"chad" is a word that like every word in politics is kept purposefully vague so everyone can fill it in how they want to be. It helps to get people on your side if you ensure your message is as vague as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 07:11 AM
1

Maybe it does but I'm not sure what that has to do with abs. They're obviously highly muscular; they just don't have abs because as I said abs are mostly achieved by low body fat, not big muscules; if you have small muscules and low body fat you still get abs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 07:07 AM
2

No it doesn't; that's the point. "abs" do not hint at strength but at low body fat percentage; the look is attained by reducing your body fat and hydration first and foremost; if you're super skinny you also have abs regardless of how strong you are. Professional athletes in fact rarely have abs because it turns out that the fat is useful for them to burn. The "low body fat look" in body builders is fairly new like 60 years old at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 06:19 AM
2

women are naturally attracted to athletic men with abs. Even if they culturally are they sure as hell aren't "naturally". The "reduce body fat to accentuate muscles"-look is a fairly recent cultural innovation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 06:11 AM
1

Pretty much—most people I feel on the street don't notice most other people concretely.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 05:19 AM
1

I'm personally not really intimidated by aesthetic human beings but apart from that I don't really pay enough attention on the street about who is and who sin't aesthetic especially when I'm walking a path I'm familiar with; I don't relaly look around much beyond not bumping in to people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 05:18 AM
2

People make eye contact with strangers on the street at all? I don't in general make eye contact with strangers unless I wish to purposefully acknowledge them—sex doesn't really play into this. I honestly don't notice most people on the street much when I'm walking and I'm certainly not going to spend the time take a good enough look to deduce their sex to decide whether or not I make eye contact because I don't make it anyway. Why would anyone make eye contact with a stranger on the street? See…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 05:07 AM
11

How does anyone know these people were gay? It seems to me OP is just filling in one's own narrative which is usually the source of absolute claims of "almost always this and that"—if you just fill it in to always lead to that it's going to seem like it's almost always true yeah. How would they even get enough gay males for this to hold? The percentage of gay males isn't high enough for every female who attends clubs to have a personal one.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 05:00 AM
5

Are there? In open relationship circles it seems to be common knowledge that it becomes polyandry pretty quickly because males are just easier so if a male/female relationship open up the expectation is generally that the female will get around three "boyfriends" before the male gets its first "girlfriend".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 08:31 AM
2

I would assume that I can answer as a no-piller. I'm not "in between blue and red"; I think pretty much all of it is bullshit. As my flair says I'm anti-relationship and anti-gender in the sense that I feel all those "heteronormative" shit is purely cultural and "love relationships" are also a recent cultural invention. All these evolutionary explanations for it are bullshit because that's not how cavemen lived their lives. Marriage is fundamentally something that has its origin in property, not…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 12:45 AM
1

If you take on an SAHM, you're consenting to alimony if you two break up. You consent if you consent; if you made the agreement that you would continue to support them in the case of a breakup then you did and apparently marriage counts as such an agreement; if you didn't and the agreement was that it would last how long it lasts then you don't. That's not how this works. This person gave up years of their lives to care for your house and your possible kids if you reproduced. Correct but that is…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 11:53 PM
1

Right, so it's not about the arguments OP gave which is what I was sort of going towards. The arguments OP gave makes it look like it's dispassionate rather than social and it's simply about time management but the reality is that the reasons are entirely social: people just dislike "career females"; it has nothing to do with actual time management else the same arguments would apply for any other hobby that consumes time and "career males" too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 11:07 PM
1

Obviously it works in reverse. Males to whom their masculinity is important enter this so-called "manosphere" more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 03:11 PM
12

How is a career worse than any other time consuming hobby? How is a "career female" worse than a "career male"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 01:13 PM
1

if they max out their positive attributes This is actually bad advice or at least to max out the popularaly perceived as positive attributes. You stand a far bigger shot if you are unconventionally unattractive than if you are conventionally unattractive. If you're unattractive if you want to maximize your chances then following the standard advise and basically just being a worse version of the ideal isn't going to help your chances as much as going into a completely different direction where t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 10:38 AM
1

That's not actually anything men are told or any standard of masculinity. If anything, boys are told to eat their greens so they grow up big and strong. There's not told a lot of things which society has aribtrarily decide are "masculine".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 10:28 AM
1

Okay, come with someone whom you think to have more of a baby face then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 06:00 AM
7

It's also quite vague; I have no idea what it's even supposed to mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 05:59 AM
8

The only people here that "hit on people" are immigrants who are used to another culture; it's never appreciated much. It's not just "hitting on"; it's just trying to strike a social conversation with strangers for no purpose; people don't appreciate that here because they don't know you and have nothing to talk about with you so you just get 'small talk' conversations about the whether which people don't seem to find that interesting here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 10:44 PM
1

The visual standards of males are considerably lower than that of females. When people say "males are visual creatures" what they basically mean is "You need to be less cream of the crop to visually impress them"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 11:53 AM
2

It's just fashion nowadays for female clothing to be very tight and form-fitting; wasn't always the case. In several older styles it was extremely loose-fitting. Also: I think it is instinct. Women's sexual strategy is to be as physically appealing as possible. This biological urge is strong enough to cause this behaviour even when the potential attention is unwanted. Yay for the that-manieth evolutoinary psychology thing that finds so-called "genetic explanations" for random cultural trends tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 10:03 AM
2

This is apparently what the average female considers to be the ideal male face. As in this is actually drawn by a genetic algorithm based on responses. It introduced random variations and people got to say whether they considered the variations more or less attractive until it eventually converged upon this based on a 200-man female sample group. Males were also of course asked their input on the ideal male face: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/11502572/Are-these-the-most-beautiful-faces-in-the…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 06:10 AM
2

Yeah some people say it's about internal vs external as in people think they're doing better when it's their own achievement but I don't even think that as people also seem to think that luck favours their person more than it should. People often have this weird idea that a coin will fall into their favour 65% of the time or something. edit: Like ehh: people seem to think they are far less likely to be hit by a car than they actually and don't fear that at all but seem to think they are far more…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 03:38 AM
1

I mean home insurance actually has a cost to it so you can justify that from that argument that if you don't get it you win out. In this case there is like no argument against it; it doesn't cost you anything unless you're the one to profit from the divorce of course and even if there is never going to be a divorce: my stuff is mine; your stuff is yours. If it's my computer I can kick you off it because it's mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 01:53 AM
2

Yeah marriage is legally about children and property, not about love. There is nothing in the law about love. People just culturally convinced themselves that essentially starting a business with someone is some kind of rite of passage about love or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 11:37 PM
3

I've noticed a particular thing in that people tend to be guilty of two biases: they think the world favours them more than it does as an_ individual; as in they are optimistic about circumstances; don't plan well enough for unforeseen setbacks because they don't think about them happening and they seem to think that gambles will end up working in their favour more often than can be statistically justified they also think the world works against them more than it does as a group; they're constan…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:53 PM
1

I am doing no such thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 08:45 PM
2

The reason you can with sex is because people feel the need to tie social significance to it and advertise their sex; specially with prepubescent children. There is no way you can reliably tell the sex of a prepubescent child at all from the body itself except by looking at the genitals but hey people feel a need to wear gender-coded outfits and hairstyles to ensure people can. With adults it's something like 75% reliable at best if all gender-coded attire was removed and in Japan people can ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 08:36 PM
1

That I'm opposed to the "social value" of sex I suppose. I'm annoyed by gender roles, gender expression, gender identity, gender politics. I treat it like blood type: when I'm not receiving a blood transfusion from you your blood type isn't relevant; when I'm not in some way handling your genitals they aren't relevant. Did you know that in some places people ascribe social value to blood type by the way? As in that's the reason why every Japanese game ever oddly lists the blood type of its chara…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 08:03 PM
1

Yeah that's why all these boyband members and male leads in romcoms who target a female audience have babyfaces. I can't believe people still believe in this idea that females by and large prefer "masculine"; how much evidence to the contrary do people still need? The only reason people continue to believe it is because they want it to be true because they feel their identity is being erased if it isn't. Tough shit—all these "masculine" film and pop stars have male fans, not female fans. The dem…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 07:32 PM
2

With "some" being "most".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 07:30 PM
2

Agreed, marriage itself is an archaic absurd thing that is kept alive for tradition and people for the most part don't even get married because they read and understsood the legal implications but primarily because they think the label is important and like to be able to call themselves married. All the reasonable parts of marriage can already be handled by contracts. The parts that can't are completely unreasonable because if they were reasonable they could be handled by contract law because co…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:04 PM
2

They don't exist where I live because it's baked in the law. There are manus and usus marriages here where in an usus marriage (default) possessions are not shared. How do you view prenuptial agreements? Would you want or expect one? Many men that I've seen advocate for them are also against "career women". If you decided to leave your wife, what should she do assuming she spent years being a wife/mother/homemaker/cook? If you're female, would you sign one? Why or why not. I like how this entire…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:02 PM
3

Not marry someone who doesn't want me to have an independent income? I am not going to poop out any one's baby I am not going to take care of any children I am not going to become financially dependent of another person and serve as their cleaner It's all pretty easy really. Why would I need a marriage to solve this problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:02 PM
2

Making plans for if/when you separate just defeats the purpose. The purpose of what? Making stupid decisions whilst high on love drugs that impede your sound judgement? Not having a back up plan when you can just for the romanticism of it is a functionally challenged way to live your life. "I could have a spare tire in my car but I won't because it's just more romantic not to."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:01 PM
1

They don't exist where I live because it's baked in the law. There are manus and usus marriages here where in an usus marriage (default) possessions are not shared. How do you view prenuptial agreements? Would you want or expect one? Many men that I've seen advocate for them are also against "career women". If you decided to leave your wife, what should she do assuming she spent years being a wife/mother/homemaker/cook? If you're female, would you sign one? Why or why not. I like how this entire…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 05:59 PM
2

No it's not. That is such a bullshit example of "We redefine a term until it means what we want it to mean." That is not what the term means or ever meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 05:32 PM
1

People are deluded about shit a lot and seem to believe what they want to believe even when it's obviously not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:38 AM
5

Ugly and unattractive aren't the same thing. A classic example of something people often consider both ugly and attractive at the same time are scars.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:35 AM
10

You're out of your mind if you think having a baby face, especially a pretty one, is a handicap for males... I can't believe there are still people who believe in this myth that females like "masculine and grizzled sonofabitch" and every time stuff pops up like Loki being the most popular MCU character with females or some other baby faced male being voted most attractive male by females or whatever they're all like "I don't understand females; this cannot be; this person does not have huge gorg…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:35 AM
2

I don't. Any "right" which is prefixed by a certain class is not a right but a social privilege a right is but a right when it belongs to all human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 08:57 AM
1

Ahh, I thought a drag queen was just a male in traditionally female clothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:41 AM
3

The phrase "treating women with respect" is like super poisoned. A lot of people who use that phrase seem to basically use it to mean "treat them like emotionally fragile weaklings who can't as much as open their own doors and are allergic to truth that might hurt" as far as "treating women with respect" goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:37 AM
6

The Gillette ad was great Strongly disagree Applying makeup is buying into patriarchal standards of beauty I am entirely unsure whether males created the makeup standard; I think makeup to females is something like muscules is to males as in females have convinced themsleves that it's something males really care about whilst in reality it's mostly a thing females care about amongst themselves. I don't think males care nearly as much about flawless skin on females as females do. Counting calories…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:35 AM
1

Short hair. I want everyone with short hair corralled away from me; I really hate short hair and everyone with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 03:31 AM
2

I find it amusing that people continue to believe that there is something such a term "exactly" is? Do you honestly believe that people use a word like that with any coherent universal definition or that the interpretation varies widely based on whoever uses it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 03:24 AM
3

Because it's nice to know your partner has your back. I stand up for my partner all the time as well. When someone stands up for you "all the time" it loses all meaning; they don't stand up because they agree but because they do it automatically because "partner". I don't need to have anyone to have "my back" when it's not a physical altercation. If my argument is correct another person repeating it doesn't make it stronger. There are different standards for men and women. Apparently you believe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:53 PM
0

As you can read I fought with his family all the time! So why do you need someone else to then? Also, a weak woman is never as bad as a weak man. "muh female-prvilege" "I should be held to a lesser standard because I'm female"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:38 PM
3

Okay, what do you think of gay male feminists then?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:23 PM
3

Yeah fuck that shit— stand up for yourself, my god. Apparently you're just as weak as those weak males if you can't do it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:20 PM
2

What do you mean "their overal demeanor"; do people really believe there is a constant "demeanor" of "male feminists"? I think the same of male feminists as I think of every feminist: "define 'feminist'" because it's a vague label that is defined differently by everyone. If they self-identify as "feminist" then I think the same of them as I think of everyone who self-identifies using super vague labels: "You are most likely not very observative and/or put a lot of weight to buzzphrases if you ei…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:08 PM
0

Yeah and I think that's fucking stupid. Slavery contracts for money are already enforced; they're called labour contracts. The sticker about slavery is that you don't get paid; there is no quid pro quo. There is a word for "contractual slavery" it's called "a job". I see no reason why you can't thus pay someone to undergo surgery and if they refuse it's breach of contract; the only reason they don't enforce it is queasy emotional morality, not reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 07:50 PM
0

Yeah and I'm saying it shouldn't be. The only police here is "We think it's wrong that people can be contractually obligated to undergo an abortion"; I don't think it's wrong any more than people being obligated to perform any other manual labour. It's just sexual morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 07:38 PM
0

Yeah it is under current contract law and I think that's silly. Of course the normal terms should apply like sound mind, quid pro quo and what not but if they do it should be treated as breach of contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 07:20 PM
1

I have a prime minister already who never had one and who is probably a virgin and asexual who has addressed this once by saying "Love and sex never really interested me I guess"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 11:57 PM
1

"dating" isn't really a thing in a lot of parts of the world but it seems to be getting more common due to American cultural influence. You sometimes see 20 year old people "go on dates" now in the Netherlands; there's not even a Dutch word for "date"; they just use the English one because it's a recent cultural import. I would assume that it would be getting more common around that time; a lot of people from my generation have never gone on a date in their lives. I haven't but a friend of mine …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 11:50 PM
10

"some do; some don't It seems to me the hardest pill to swallow in this sub and in many places is that human beings are individuals and you actually have to get to know people before you can say stuff about them and the easy way of making assumptions about them based on their gender which may sound easy is like wrong 60% of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 07:52 PM
1

Because people are super easily manipulated into thinking they need to do random things to fit in to feel part of some imaginary "identity group" they created. Tell a man that it's "female" and that it should "identify as such" and create some kind of bizarre expectation in said man's brain based on its genitals that it has some "camp" to belong to and lo as it does all sorts of things it otherwise wouldn't just to fit in and be constantly be mortally afraid having to prove its "female-ness" to …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 06:34 AM
1

How does this sort of thing make sense in the context of hypergamy? How does the world make sense in the context of any absolutist rule applied to humans with no room for individual variation? How does the idea that human beings have two legs when I saw someone at the supermarket missing a leg? If "hypergamy" means "all human beings, no exception" then it is trivially bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 06:29 AM
2

Having to share a lifelong partner with three other people is a plus above having a lifelong partner to myself to be honest but I'd probably still take lifelong celibacy if that means no sex whatsoever opposed to any "partner".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 03:18 AM
1

Indeed, and either has an equal opportunity to walk out here. Why do you assume "the guy" will be the one to reject the offer of parenthood? Both biological parents get an identical right of refusal if the conception was an accident; if both refuse then the child goes to adoption; if one refuses and the other doesn't then the latter becomes a single parent. Of course the person wherein the child grows has autonomy over its own body and can thus perform an abortion but only so long as the artific…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 12:13 AM
1

I think I'm pretty close to that point already. I personally've no real complains about my lack of addiction to human social contact that most people seem to experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 11:02 PM
1

How are you being punished for it? Why is there a need for a registry; just don't agree to have one and you can't be forced.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 10:14 PM
5

Some of us are morally against abortions. You're trying to contractually force us into having one. Surely you would not agree to having an abortion if you are against it morally? How about an 'I'm morally opposed to abortion' register where you put your name and opt out of his opting out? Or just not... agree to it? The thing with contracts is that they can only put punitives onto someone for not doing something they agreed to prior so yeah...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 09:31 PM
5

What I want is to eat cheeseburgers and ice cream every day and still be thin, but that's not a realistic outcome to eating cheeseburgers and ice cream every day. Yeah because that's physics. It would be pretty absurd if there was an easy way to avoid this like say a pill but the government bans you from taking it because there needs to be responsibility to eating this stuff. There are biological consequences I have no control over. I can only control what goes in my body (or what body you put y…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 08:22 PM
12

No one should be able to 'opt out' of responsibility for a child without some serious consideration. The time to decide you don't want a child is BEFORE you have sex with someone. Use a fucking condom. Get on birth control. Oh please, reliable birth control doesn't exist. Even tying tubes is not 100% reliable and on top of that people can sabotage birth control. The mere act of "I use birth control" should be enough to not form a contract based on family planning because it clearly communicates …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:27 PM
7

Came here to say this. I think that paternity tests should be mandatory if that is either your argument for claiming legal parentage or if an official thinks that is your assumption. The only way to waive it would be to say and declare "I know this child is not my genetic offspring and I seek legal parentage anyway". "presumption of parenthood" is a ridiculous thing in the age of 50 EUR costing paternity tests. Why would you presume anything? Apart from that I think that no human being should be…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:10 PM
1

Apparently not because I never eat peanut butter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 08:51 AM
1

That entirely depends on where you live as the person you replied to said. Where I live short hair is famously common on females typically dyed bordeaux or a similar "just barely not edgy" colour.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:26 AM
1

It takes self confidence to go against the grain, which a lot of young women lack. Of course not. You see a lot of super depressed self hating individuals with no self-confidence at all either put absolutely no effort into their appearance or look very edgy. I've no idea where this idea comes from that "insecurity" and "dependence of the opinions of others" are somehow the same thing but I would sort of say that it's the opposite. People just use the words "confident" and "insecure" it seems to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:23 AM
2

I mean "short" in (American?) English is kind of a word I had to get used to with regards to hair. Apparently "short" does not mean the same thing when applied to male and female hair and the same hair length can be "long" when applied to a male and "short" when applied to a female. I've been told by several Englishmen that this is not the case in English English and that they use the terms the same for both sexes. As far as I know this also does not happen where I live. I would personally call …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:19 AM
1

You know I kind of feel that if people wouldn't want casual sex they wouldn't be doing it; might be a really weird idea but it sort of makes sense in my brain. Also it turns out not everyone lives their lives based on the almighty standard of how much "men want you".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:54 AM
4

If you look at r/niceguys the term has now devolved to "any male individual who's a creep when making sexual advances to a female individual" to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:34 AM
1

....why?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 05:16 AM
1

Casual sex is bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:38 AM
4

That's silly logic; that's not "middle eastern females being slutshamed" that's "people being slut-shamed in a country where it's more common"; they aren't due to their race but due to the country. They are in fact slut-shamed less than say the white population if they move to say the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 01:17 AM
2

Because it's only bad for white/East-Asian ones to be honest. I think there is a big kernel of truth to the idea that "feminism is mostly white female problems"; it seems like a lot of all these expectations people say that "society" has on "females" in reality "The US" has on "white/East-Asian females". The whole princess-complex doesn't really apply to others because people don't perceive them as some precious scarce fragile good in the same way. Other races don't really get slut shamed half a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 01:09 AM
1

I think traditions are—in general—stupid and that "We have done it for a long time" is a very inane reason to do something.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 01:06 AM
4

The argument against it is that you inconvenience the innocent into surrenderig their DNA and have their DNA on file now. Is the DNA destroyed after this test was done? If not—is if they do this for every crime that they do hospital wide DNA testing then there's a lot of DNA testing going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 01:01 AM
7

That's the thing with a lot of this evolutionary psychology pseudoscience about how a lot of gender roles are supposedly so "biological"; a lot of the roles they talk about are like 140 years old at best. long big eyelashes being "feminine" is as weird as saying that hairy arms are feminine: biologically it's masculine but that's how culture works eh.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 09:13 PM
5

It's also a marker in males. In general if you are healthier your hair grows longer and faster and is thicker. If you're poorly nourished or stressed out your hair falls off or doesn't grow as fast, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 08:58 PM
11

Are you kidding me? Male hair grows faster and longer than female hair. Same with eyelashes and nails by the way. It's almost like testosterone makes all hair on your body grow faster. Are you seriously with a straight face saying that long hair is gender dimorphism in humans? In any thing it's quite unusual that females can grow long hair too in humans; usually when species have manes only the males grow them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 08:57 PM
1

I don't have a pill and "left" vs "right" is a thing that only makes sense in the American two party system. I have like 25 parties I can choose from each election. The biggest party here right now is anti poor, anti environment, pro abortion, wants to add right to suicide to the constitution and wants to abolish sex registration so yeah. The biggest voice against abortion where I live is also socialist party that is very much about the poor so all these American "left/right" artificial distinct…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 01:46 AM
1

I don't settle down and I don't like parties. I assume I will just continue to live this life until I'm forced to relocate myself to some retirement home and then I die.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 01:41 AM
1

I'd pick cute over sexy but rather neither but like "sexy" is pretty revolting and in practice for want of a better phrase "fucking gay" if you get what I mean. Not that cute is good but it's not as bad. Do you think it's true that men tend to commit to cute women? In my opinion it's correlated but not directly. It think that "commit" is a buzzword that is flown around a lot in Anglic discourse and no one bothers to define it because everyone seems to mean a different thing with it. My native la…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 11:39 PM
1

no doesn't always mean no Nothing always means what it means; people lie sometimes; that should be a no-brainer and this is not special. Are we really in the amazing realization that there are some people who lie sometimes?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 05:51 AM
1

I'm female and I hate getting help and do pretty much anything on my own and if I do get help I pay for it and negotiate a price to ensure I'm indebted to no one. I don't allow people to buy me anything unless I can pay them back to the cent; when people come to visit me or I come to visit them I insist on splitting the cost for public transport plus a stipent for whoever travels to compensate them for their time. So like what am I lying or whatever, how does this work? A single counter example …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 04:20 AM
1

I have no love language except words; I have no language except words and maybe facial expressions. I believe in zipless hugs, zipless fucks, zipless cuddles, zipless anything; when I do something like that I do it because I enjoy doing it; not to communicate, I use my mouth for that. There are a lot of people in my life whom I'm not in love with whom I just enjoy cuddling or having sex with and do so. It probably affects my dating life in weird ways; it's all normal to me but I realize I lead a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 04:18 AM
2

People get married because they care about the label; people do not get married for the legals and few people who get married understand them. Most people who get married just do so because they like to be able to refer to each other as their spouse. Makes them think something changed and that their relationship is now better or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:45 PM
0

I beg to differ—you shouldn't get married if you think you can exclude that because then you're just looking at everything unobjectively through a pink filter. But hey, marriage—in essence—is a contract signed under the influence of drugs (love) that is somehow legally binding.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:28 PM
2

Assuming a man's most base desire is sex, and a woman's most base desire is hypergamy Everything can be made true by assuming a falsehood. I'm pretty sure the base desire of most people is to protect their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:26 PM
1

That seems watered down honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 06:46 PM
1

Well you asked how it could function without telling it; and I'm telling you how.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 02:18 AM
0

Basic matching algorithm. Basically if websites like last.fm and spotify can with high accuracy recomend me new music without any of that I think dating sites can as well just use a learning algorithm that learns from your swipes. I think they purposefully don't due to the aforementioned reason. The dating site just starts by giving you a random selection and you swipe and based on that it learns your taste and the matches get progressively more accurate. I mean this is the age where if you uplo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 01:55 AM
0

A video introduction is a good point, but I think most people wouldn't be bothered or would be uncomfortable making a video for it. I'm not sure, but I think it's hard to airbrush a video and people would not be able to find an appropriate video from five years ago to use. Which might all say something about the authenticity of these platforms. Well that's my point; it's to weed that out. But if everyone is doing it the competition you're facing up against is also lower of course. The system is …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 01:26 AM
1

Or just someone whose desire develops as they get to know you? who knows. I don't trust people much who have a lot of opinions about people they don't really know.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 01:18 AM
1

I think those websites are silly because they're picture and not video based. I don't get that shit; you get a way better impression of someone if they just make a short video of themselves introducing themselves and talking about the stuff they usually put in their profile. Like just a minute talking or something. You hear their voice and see their facial movements—way better. Apart from that I gather that Bumble has some weird system that treats you differently based on your sex and I don't li…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:44 AM
1

No, because that's my point. There are no "edge cases" in things like physics; laws are absolute; if there is an edge case to a law then the law is wrong. We have a word in exact science for "99.99999999999999999999999999999% true" it's called "false" My point from the start was that biology had edge cases and that therefore nothing can be logically concluded from anything any more.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 04:09 PM
1

It's true, I don't know what SRY gene is, but: Well that is a really important part of human sex determination. Basically it's a gene that is normally on the Y chromosome that's the "active ingredient", the rest of the Y chromosome is packaging; this singular gene in placental mammals is the testis-determining factor. The problem is it isn't always on the Y chromosome, it sometimes is on other chromosomes; it sometimes is there but fails to express itself; sometimes people know why; sometimes th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 04:02 PM
2

I am turned off by anyone describes themselves with a label that is super vague and means a different thing to anyone without defining what they mean with it. It implies they either didn't look around enough to be perceptive of that it means a different thing for everyone or (honestly less bad) they know this full well and use it to their advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 02:22 PM
2

Several people without a flair answered that of which you have to in your mind belief they're female to live in the continued delusion that every male is like you and every female is not you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 02:19 PM
1

Oh yes, you can. Did the person inherit an X chromosome from the father or the Y one? That determines the sex of the kid. Even with trisomies there's no room for confusion. So does a "Y chromosome" without an expressive SRY gene qualify for a "Y chromosome" or not? does an X chromosome with an expressive SRY gene qualify as an Y chromosome or an X chromosome? Who defines when SRY genes are "expressive" or not? I'm going to go on a limb that you probably don't even know what I'm talking about and…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 01:49 PM
1

Sex faces similar problems where you still can't really derive absolutes from them. You can't conclude that someone has a penis from being "biologically male"; penes can be lost in accidents amongst other things. This isn't like hard physics where you can make absolute logical inferences from definitions. If something is a photon then you may derive with logical certainty a great number of properties about that something for it would simply not be a photon if those properties did not hold. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 03:40 AM
3

It's a self-identified label; a person's gender by definition is what the person says it is and it's nothing more than that; that's the only thing it derives. That's the only conclusion you can make from it. As such it's circularly useful for exactly one thing: knowing what gender someone identifies as which itself is again only useful for the same. If one accepts that notion - that gender roles are to be discarded - what then is the point of even identifying with a gender at all? If there are n…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 03:35 AM
1

What's meant by this is that bodybuilders hit the gym to grow muscules for aesthetic reasons rather than to fit a particular purpose practical purpose whatever it is; another thing they often do is dehydrate and lower the body fat percentage to make the skin tigher over the muscule and provide more definition which goes against utilizing the muscles which like a proportionally decent layer of fat to smoothly operate. So basically the muscles of body boulders aren't strong or fast or whatever. Pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 02:37 AM
0

I think the basic asymmetry is that males, MRA's, red pill and what-not very often says "females should be feminine" Whereas females, feminists, bluepills and what-not very rarely say "males should be masculine." In fact that's also something that males, MRA's, red pills and what-not often say. So obviously it's far easier for the second group to paint "masculinity" in a bad light than the former; in fact a lot of females, feminists, and bluepills also talk about "toxic femininity" to some measu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 01:22 AM
3

What does that have to do with my point? My point is that it makes more sense that people like functional than nonfunctional muscles. Bodybuilders do completely different things in the gym than Olympic swimmers who obviously train their muscles for functionality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 10:52 PM
1

My dealbreakers aren't sexual so my suddenly having a penis wouldn't really change my dealbrakers from my current one; my dealbreakers would be sexual of course if they demanded sexual exclusivity so that's one but basically: telling me what I can and cannot do in my own time including whom I can and cannot have sex with; telling me what I can and cannot do in shared time when it doesn't concern you like insisting that I do different things with my food and the lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 10:42 PM
4

Women also love to point out Olympic swimmers as the ideal body ...... just so you know those guys have gym routines True, but their routines are functional of course. The thing is; people often say that there is some "evolutionary subconscious desire" or whatever to like a certain physique that isn't functional. That makes no sense; if people are subconsciously attracted to muscles for evolutionary reasons then surely it must be to actual functional muscles? Whilst you may get functional muscle…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 10:41 PM
1

I honestly find this "picturing" to be ridiculous; I can't even allow myself to do that if I wanted to. Everyone just "pictures" what they want to see; if they dislike the behaviour they will picture all sorts of nasty traits and if they like the behaviour they will picture all sorts of great traits. Anyone who does it is an unbelievable fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 08:18 PM
1

No, males and females do not have exactly equal mean IQs because how could it ever be exactly the same? That exact identicality would be screwed the moment a single smart male or female dies obviously. The thing is that it's close enough together that different researches put different sexes with the higher mean however it does seem like more often than not they put males with the higher mean with about a +1.5 higher mean IQ on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 08:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter