TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cindymannunu Archive

View 0 posts and 91 comments by cindymannunu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Dumping your load in someone typically doesn't end in another human ripping you apart to get out, however. Pregnancy can debilitate and kill, so I think that may have alot to do with the "OMG" factor of an adult male/young female. A child being debilitated/killed by another child exiting it's body just isn't as savory a thought as a child getting their genitals massaged by an adult I guess.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/19 11:35 AM
1

your belief is that consent to sex = consent to being a parent No, my belief is that if society has to pay for what you choose to do with your gametes, so should you. What you do with your gametes is your choice, not society's choice, so why should society pay for what you chose to do with your gametes before you pay?
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:03 PM
1

Yes, and he can also rinse it out in a sink so no one can use his sperm because it goes down the drain, and take the used condom with him. That would require only having sex around a sink, however. =P
/r/MensRights27/05/19 07:52 PM
1

leave the unwilling father out of it. Sure, as long as he chooses to leave his sperm out of it. > A man's choice don't matter to society! Of course where a man chooses to put his sperm matters to society if society has to pay for that choice he makes. > She can pick the damn condom from the trash... Don't put it in the trash then.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 09:46 AM
1

I agree that everyone pays for their choices, so if that's your stance, then yes, I agree with it. Both men and women pay for any of their children that exist due to thier choices for thier own gamates before society pays, sans rape/theft.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:21 AM
1

Women do pay, as do the men who choose to give them the choice to pay.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:10 AM
1

I don't choose for a man, he does. A man can choose to give me the choice to abort or remain pregnant or choose to not give me those choices all by choosing where to put his sperm. That's his choice to make, not mine. What society chooses to do if he makes the choice to put his sperm in my vagina is up to society, not me. If society wants to take some of his money to pay for any child that his sperm helped cause, that is up to society, not me. A man is free to choose to keep his sperm out of my …
/r/MensRights27/05/19 07:37 AM
1

you have the freedom to avoid parenthood even after conception. They do not. So? Men have the freedom to choose to not place sperm in my vagina if they don't want me to have that freedom they don't have. Sorry, the choices that nature didn't provide a man's body isn't my fault, but the choices a man provides my body is a man's fault. If any man doesn't want to be at fault for what happens to my body, they are free to choose to not place their sperm in my vagina. All men are free to choose to not…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:11 PM
1

the only way for a man to avoid parenthood is to avoid sex. Incorrect. If any man doesn't want me to have the choice to remain pregnant or abort, any of those men are free to choose not have sex with me and I will be unable to choose to remain pregnant or abort. Therefore, all men already have the freedom to choose to avoid parenthood with me. You still are not fully reading my posts before commenting. It's not all about you. Of course my choices are all about me. I don't make choices for anyone…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:27 PM
1

If the only way to avoid parenthood is to not have sex, then ban abortion. If men don't want me to have the choice to have an abortion or remain pregnant, they are already free to choose to not have sex with me. I will be unable to have an abortion or remain pregnant as long as a man chooses to not have sex with me. If a man chooses to have sex with me, he is the one that gave me the choice to abort or remain pregnant, and he is the one that unbanned abortion or remaining pregnant for me. I am u…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:01 PM
1

Men are already free to renounce parenthood by freely choosing to not have sex with me, so there is nothing for me to be concerned about when it comes to men having a choice to renounce parenthood. (this has nothing to do with rape/theft, that's a different topic)
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:37 PM
1

a woman should have complete autonomy to decide whether or not both she and her partner become parents. Nope. Just complete autonomy to decide what happens to her body. > we force parenthood on men because we have the power to do so Nope. Society makes their own choices. Don't lump me in there with them. I am not in charge of what society decides to do, only what I decide to do. > men should be denied any autonomy Nope. Men should have complete autonomy to decide what happens to their bodies. > …
/r/MensRights26/05/19 12:34 PM
1

You're getting very emotional. The words you quoted hold no emotion. You still don't have a point. Make real points, not points that can never happen in reality. > But it's not relevant. A failed abortion is relevant - a child exists when they fail, nor should they be forced on women's bodies in order for men to have a choice that nature did not provide men's bodies. Just because a choice exists for a woman's body doesn't mean that if she doesn't make that choice for her body that a man should b…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 12:11 PM
0

If society shouldn't be made to pay for the child because society didn't consent to it, why should the man — who also didn't consent to it — be made to pay for it? No one person can make society do anything. You don't have a point. > she can abort. Abortions can fail, and they shouldn't be forced in order for men to have the freedom to not have to pay for where they choose to place their sperm.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:55 AM
0

the child can exist without the consent of both parents. So? What does that have to do with society? If society has to pick up the tab for something that society didn't consent to, why shouldn't they make a child's actual parents pick up the tab as well, as long as they have enough money and are fit parents? > a woman is to have complete control over the decision whether or not the child will exist No, a woman doesn't. Women can be forcefully impregnated and all forms of birth control can fail a…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:43 AM
0

this has no bearing on the relative control men and women have other their fertility. No one has 100% control over their fertility. Any choice people make can lead to a child resulting. If a child exists, I don't see why society shouldn't ensure that both it's parents (if fit and not raped) pay for it's care if society has to pay for it, because a child can't exist without both parent's gamates causing it to exist.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:24 AM
1

But society don't seek restitution from both parents? Yes, society does, if society has to pay because the parent who is caring for the kid seeks help from society then society will seek restitution, if possible, from the absentee parent (if said parent is fit or has enough money) If a man doesn't want to risk having a child that society will seek restitution for, he is free to attempt to keep his sperm to himself (rape and theft can negate this) and hope it works. If a woman doesn't want to ris…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:06 AM
1

She decides, he works. A man and woman both decide if they want to have sex with each other. She decides if her body is used by any pregnancy after sex is over. Society seeks restitution from both parents of any child that exists if society has to pay for it. Which of those steps are you upset with? Sound like the final step, I think? Why shouldn't society seek restitution from both parents for any child that both parents caused to exist? (not talking about rape, imo rape should equal the one ra…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:23 AM
-1

Yep, and not all kids are lucky to have physically talented dads in their lives, some kids have regular dads that wouldn't be able to have saved them like this. So assuming that all dads will be able to can be a false assumption.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:04 AM
3

Those are lucky kids to have physically talented dads in their lives, but to assume all men are physically talented just because they are dads can be a very false assumption for not only dads but for any person you make that assumption about due to them simply wanting and trying to be a parent.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:49 AM
1

you just said there should be no equality. Nope. Both genders are equally free to labor to find a way to ensure their own gamates don't cause a child they will have to pay for before society pays.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 05:17 AM
0

It doesn't matter how a pregnancy ends. You still had a choice. Impregnating a woman is a choice. Your child existing is 50% your responsibility and 50% her responsibility. Men have the power to choose before sex, women have the power to choose after sex. Maybe one day you'll stop acting like society should have to pay for where you choose to place your sperm and understand this.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 05:03 AM
0

I'd rather fuck my husband, but thank's for the offer! =P Good luck with your sperm! I didn't have any luck preventing one of my eggs from causing a child, so I understand how hard it can be. All my birth control failed and I was raped, (this was nearly 30 years ago so please don't feel bad, I am not as traumatized anymore), and after the rape I couldn't bring myself to go get invaded for abortion so I didn't even know who the father was until it was old enough to start looking like my husband a…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:52 AM
0

the woman gets pregnant... ...because of your sperm and her egg. If a child results from your sperm and her egg, then you both pay for it if you can before society does. No one in society should have to pay for what your sperm and her egg caused before you both pay if you can. You both are free to find a way to ensure your sperm and her egg don't cause a child if either of you are unwilling to pay for one.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:42 AM
1

you aren't holding yourself accountable Which part of "same goes for women" means I am not holding myself accountable if I am a woman? All this equally applies to a woman as well, since her child can not exist without her egg causing it to exist. Your inability to read all of my posts is your problem, not mine. BOTH PAY = man and woman are accountable, so of course I am accountable for any child my egg causes to exist if I am a woman.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:29 AM
0

You keep repeating yourself. As will all of society each time you ask society to pay instead of you for your child that your sperm caused, when you are able to pay for your child yourself. Same goes for women - they pay for their child that their egg caused before society does if they are able.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:19 AM
0

You can't face this discussion in an honest manner. You will not be taken seriously. Your child can not exist without your sperm causing it to exist. That's as honest as it gets. Since your child can not exist without your sperm causing it to exist, it is your's to pay for before society pays for it, if one exists. And all this equally applies to her as well, since her child can not exist without her egg causing it to exist. When you are ready to be honest with society, then society will take yo…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:09 AM
0

you can't keep dodging the pregnancy Without your sperm, there is no child that can result. You both have to pay for any child your sperm and her eggs cause. You both are free to find a way to ensure your sperm and her eggs don't cause a child if you both don't want to pay for one.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:58 AM
0

It doesn't matter where the ingredients come from Of course it does. Without your sperm, your child can not exist, therefore your sperm matters. > We have to give men reproductive rights They have the same legal reprodcutive rights as women. Both men and women have to pay for any child their gamate causes. > the courts give custody largely to women If the female parent has less money, of course, so she can provide the physical care for the child. If the female parent shows more interest in havin…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:44 AM
1

Of course sperm and egg are necessary... Therefore if your sperm and her egg causes a child, you both help pay for it before society does. > it's called welfare, food stamps, etc. That's to help poor parents care for their children, not to pay for children instead of their parents. > It's most of the time men.. So? Both parents should help pay for their child, either by physically helping to care for it, or using their money to help care for it before society pays to help care for it. > the cour…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:13 AM
1

Sperm doesn't cause a child Prove a child can exist without sperm causing it to exist. Sorry, society shoudn't and doesn't pay for any child your sperm and her egg causes before you both do. only men get garnished BS. Whichever parent is not physically taking care of their child has their wages garnished to help pay for their child's care. A parent physically taking care of their child is helping to pay for it's care, so there is no need to garnish the wages of any parent that is physically taki…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 02:18 AM
2

This makes no sense. Pay for what? If your sperm and her egg causes a child, you both help pay for it as long as you both have money. Society shouldn't, and currently doesn't, have to pay for a child that your sperm and her egg caused before you both pay for it. Society should, and does, garnish both of your wages to pay for any child that your sperm and her egg causes.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:23 AM
-2

My sperm does nothing to a female that she doesn't want it to do Prove it. Otherwise, pay for what your sperm does, just as she pays for what her egg does.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:12 AM
-3

that's the price to pay for being female, eh? And the price for being male is having to pay for what your sperm does to a female, just as she will have to pay for what your sperm does to her.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 12:45 AM
-10

Legal Paternal Surrender (LPS) Sure, men can sign a registry for LPS as a *YES I WILL BE A FATHER* or *NO I WON'T BE A FATHER* if they want, and women can peruse it to see which men they wish to have sex with from that list. Easy, peasy.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 08:13 PM
1

(women) said yes (to sex) regardless... ...of men not wanting women to have abortions because men are free to not have sex with women regardless of men not wanting women to have abortions after men place their sperm inside a woman's vagina. > women ... are against abortions Women who are against abortions are free to not have abortions.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 06:07 PM
1

Men (can) ask for sex (from women) And women can ask for abortions from men who can ask for sex from women. If men don't want women to ask for abortions, they don't have to ask women for sex.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 05:56 PM
1

You don't get pregnant unless... ...a man places his sperm in my vagina. Men are quite free to choose to not place their sperm in my vagina if they want me to not be able to choose to abort the torturous risk to my life that their sperm could cause to happen to my body.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 05:45 PM
1

but men don't complain Why would they? Men's bodies won't be at risk from dying or suffering the torture from any resulting pregnancy that is caused by men placing their sperm inside a woman's vagina. If any man doesn't want a woman to be able to choose to abort the torturous risk to her life his sperm could cause to happen to her body, he is free to choose to not place his sperm inside a woman's vagina.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 05:02 PM
-1

K. Hopes can die hard. Good luck with those, crazy people need alot of good luck, I hear.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:06 AM
-1

Are you seriously expecting a crazy person to be able to explain their craziness? And you call me crazy? =P
/r/MensRights23/05/19 06:53 AM
1

How a man put the sperm in her body. By a man agreeing to put his sperm in her vagina. He can say no if asked to do so by a woman.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:16 AM
-3

Now legalize prostitution so all women can get paid for men's sperm risking their lives, and society will be all set! And yes, I am dead serious. If all women have to legally risk their lives in child birth, they all should be legally paid for the sex that causes that to happen. Otherwise, it would be smarter for all women to simply stop having sex with men and only have free sex with other women.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:32 AM
5

How about we, males and females, ask our partners what they feel they need from a relationship and then support their individual needs instead of assuming everyone needs the same things supported in their individual relationships?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:22 AM
1

He could try to offer to pay a woman he happens to impregnate to labor to abort, so she will fix his problem that nature did not give his body the option to abort a pregnancy in his body. I know he can only hope she takes his job offer instead of freely labor to give birth to his impregnation, but it never hurts to offer, I guess?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:39 AM
2

Are you able to save your child from being murdered? If so, why are you wasting time with an opinion about it? Go save it.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:19 AM
-1

Yes, labor to attempt to abort what a man's sperm caused her egg to begin to develop into instead of labor to attempt to give birth to what a man's sperm caused her egg to begin to develop into.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 10:16 PM
1

Not sure how disagreement with reality changes reality, but thanks for the discussion.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 09:15 PM
1

Women have a natural ability to perform safe abortions in their own bodies with any tech they have the ability to build due to having the natural ability to become pregnant, correct. What does that have to do with men not having a natural ability to perform safe abortions on their own bodies with any tech they have the ability to build due to not having a natural ability to become pregnant?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 09:09 PM
1

Nature, not tech, gave women's bodies the ability to become pregnant and the ability to end their own body's pregnancies before birth or via birth. Are you seriously trying to claim a woman's body was not granted these abilities by nature itself before any tech was ever built?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 09:03 PM
1

Yes, you are. You are upset that nature has not given you the same choice it gave any woman you happen to impregnate. If you want the same choice she has, you are free to labor to figure out a way to be pregnant in her sted, that way you can have the same choice as her - attempt to end your pregnancy via abortion or birth and hope you don't die or become disabled for life from either of those choices.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 08:11 PM
1

No one ever claimed that nature is fair. It's not fair that a pregnancy could kill/disable a woman during or while attempting to end it via abortion or birth. Not sure why the fact that nature not being fair has to do with my question?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 08:04 PM
1

Again, no one can force either of you to continue to risk your life if you change your mind. That's already equally applied for you both. If you both have money, however, why shouldn't both of you be paying for any child your sperm and her egg caused?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:53 PM
1

Ok, why shouldn't you both be paying for a child you both caused if you are both capable? If you have money, why shouldn't it be used for a child your sperm caused? If she has money, why shouldn't it be used for a child her egg caused?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:46 PM
1

Who is that? The woman? If she needs help to pay for a child that your sperm caused, why shouldn't she take some of your money to help pay for it? The state? Why shouldn't they use your money to pay for a child your sperm caused?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:36 PM
1

Ok, if you don't pay for any child your sperm caused then who is?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:34 PM
1

Why should other men have to pay for any child your sperm caused while you are capable of paying for it?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:32 PM
1

If you changed your mind they didn't force you to continue to risk your life, correct, and they still don't.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:58 PM
1

Again, please provide evidence the US Military IS forcing anyone to continue to risk their lives once they changed their minds.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:55 PM
1

That is not evidence for my request.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:51 PM
1

Until viability, which is confirmed by a pregnancy being able to live unnattached from the womb it attached itself to.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:48 PM
1

Please provide evidence of anyone being forced by the US Military to continue to risk their own lives after they changed their mind.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:47 PM
1

The US Military doesn't force anyone to continue to risk their own lives if they changed their mind.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:45 PM
1

Again, it doesn't matter if you consented to risk your own life, you are still free to change your mind at anytime with out anyone forcing you to continue to risk your own life.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:41 PM
1

No one forces you to continue to risk your life in the US military if you change your mind about risking your life in the US military.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:35 PM
1

No, agreements don't work that way when it comes to your own life being at risk. No one is free to force you to risk your own life if you change your mind about risking your own life.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:32 PM
0

Sorry, nature is a cruel mistress I suppose. Offer to pay any woman you happen to impregnate to labor to fix it for you, I guess, and hope she accepts your job offer?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:07 PM
0

The American justice system. Oh, in that case, you would have to talk to whoever is in charge of that if you think they are preventing you from fixing what nature didn't provide your body with. Otherwise, I guess you could offer to pay any woman you happen to impregnate to labor to fix what nature didn't provide your body with - the choice to abort an unwanted pregnancy inside your body or gestate/give birth to a wanted pregnancy inside your body.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:01 PM
1

Sorry, I don't understand? Who is stopping you from doing anything you want right now? Are you asking women to labor to fix what nature didn't provide your body, or are you claiming that someone is preventing you from fixing it yourself? If it's the latter, who is preventing you?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:57 PM
0

Nature gave her body a choice that it didn't give your body, and you want her to fix that for you? How much are you going to pay her for her labor to fix it for you?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:53 PM
0

Again, if she aborts, there is no child to financially pay for... I still don't understand?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:46 PM
2

> women shouldn't have sex if they're not willing to have a baby. Why? Women can simply abort if they happen to become pregnant at a time they are not ready to risk their lives attempting to give birth. Are you saying women shouldn't have sex with you if they are not willing to have your baby? Why? You don't want to have sex with a woman that doesn't want to have your baby? Then don't have sex with a woman that doesn't want to have your baby. Call the police if she rapes you. (although that opti…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:40 AM
1

There is no current contreception that is guarenteed to work 100%, which is why if she is not the one choosing to remain pregnant and dies, whoever forces her to do so and she dies as a result would be the murderer.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 09:46 AM
1

an alternative where BOTH parties agree to the pregnancy Why should she be denied by anyone from ending her body's pregnancy at anytime, regardless of what she wanted at the begining, when she is the only one who will suffer from anything the pregnancy does to her body?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 08:55 AM
0

If a women can abort a child then why can’t I do the same If she aborts, there would be no child for you to pay for.... I don't understand your issue?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 08:48 AM
0

Why should other men have to pay for a man's unwanted child while he has the ability to do so? No, I am not a man, but I am a mother of a man. Why should my son have to pay for any other man's unwanted child while that man has the ability to pay for his own unwanted child? My son has not impregnated any woman, so why should he have to pay for any child a woman gives birth to? So no, I am not for society having to pay for an unwanted child while it's own parents are capable of paying for it. I ha…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:26 AM
2

I wasn't passing judgement. I mean, you asked why someone would stop the fight, so I answered honestly and then recomended a way to ensure no one stop anyone from attacking you, that's all.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 12:40 PM
1

?What does that have to do with the fact that men impregnate women? I was trying to be funny, by the way, with my original comment. Everyone knows that men impregnate women - so when a woman winds up with her own kids that she can do that to, someone not understanding how women wind up being able to do that to their kids just begged for my comment to be posted, you see... ​ But a joke is never funny when you have to explain it, so I guess it wasn't a funny joke?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 01:17 AM
1

it's unlikely There is a chance each time a man sleeps with a woman. As long as that is true, chances are, she will be impregnated when a man sleeps with her.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/19 06:32 PM
2

I mean, if a man sleeps with a woman at all, chances are, she will be impregnated. If contraception worked 100% of the time, that would be listed on the package.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/19 06:09 PM
2

To defend the one that was attacked. I mean, if you don't want anyone to defend you when you are attacked, let ppl know the next time you are attacked, I am sure they won't mind not helping you.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/19 08:20 AM
3

Men impregnate them.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/19 08:01 AM
1

At what point does the defender become the attacker? When they do something to defend themselves they did not have to in order to defend themselves that results in the harm of the original attacker? Is that not the definition of excessive force? Also, are any actions taken on behalf of/by either party involved (that was the defender at any time) in the encounter after the end of the encounter considered consequences?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/19 10:55 PM
1

The approach then should be to restrain said guy I agree - restraint is how to deal when it actually happens, for both the stronger and the weaker. Is restraint required by those that are being attacked? If not, then you are saying it's not ok to dole out consequences for excessive force.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/19 10:21 PM
1

they brought it up on themselves and should also face the consequences of that Yes, and those that use excessive force to dole out consequences should also face the consequences of that. Can't give you a solid answer Then why should anyone care about the claim *kids are still learning* before doling out consequences until there is an answer to that claim?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/19 09:42 PM
1

anyone who is weaker should have thought twice Does this mean it's not ok to defend the weaker from the stronger and at the same time defend the stronger from the weaker? Kids are still learning how life works When does learning stop for anyone?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/19 08:44 PM
1

Sorry, what is a frost strwachild?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/19 11:49 AM
-3

You come across a few people and you believe one of them to be weaker then one of the other, would you think it is ok for anyone to attempt to defend the weaker one from being hurt by the stronger one, while also trying to defend the stronger one from being hurt by the weaker one? It's just a question, not a judgement.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/19 08:10 PM
-4

Weaker is weaker. Is it ok to defend those that are weaker from those that are stronger?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/19 08:00 PM
-4

Would they have been wrong to come to the defense of a small child that tried to do this? If not, why is it not ok to come to the defense of anyone who is weaker then the cop that tried to do this?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/19 07:51 PM
2

Wow, that sounded like her head might have hit the wall she fell against hard enough to burst.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/19 07:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter