TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cishet Archive

View 8 posts and 151 comments by cishet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Some Jews don't consider themselves "white". For some Jews, it is difficult to absorb that Jews were once considered to be non-white. Still others, oddly enough, will never think of themselves as white at all. They still consider themselves to be part of a minority that exists outside the white mainstream of America. They feel that they are strangers in the land, still.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:09 AM
7

An anonymous letter was accepted into evidence? WTF? How does one judge the veracity the writer? How does one cross examine the double hearsay within the letter? Can the accused entered letters of anonymous witnesses saying that they all heard the girl lean out the window and scream that she is consenting to sex? WTF is going on with these mock trials? If the fucking OCR can strongly encourage this process, it better fucking well mandate that a true, fair hearing is held.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 10:36 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:54 PM
1

Great post. So true.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:16 AM
8

These people are really, really afraid of the MRM. It's kinda flattering.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:49 PM
3

Rodger, the son of a British father and ethnic Chinese mother had cited difficulties fitting in with others because of his race, and found it hard to meet women.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:29 PM
10

He's not "white". Sooooooooooo, how does that work?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:28 PM
-17

Never heard of "virgin shaming".
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:23 PM
2

Thomas Ball firebombed a courthouse? I thought he self-immolated.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:01 PM
8

Misogyny didn't make him kill, but it was the reason he killed.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:31 PM
1

Just because he has a penis doesn't mean s/he's a man!!!
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:24 PM
3

Pics or it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:09 PM
0

"Pick-up artists," i.e. dweebs and losers.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:07 PM
-5

Patriarchy - collective guilt, i.e. they were responsible for their own deaths because reasons, so feminists would have me believe.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:05 PM
3

Oh, for God's sake...
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:04 PM
2

I'm married. So, I don't know.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:53 AM
1

Because, "Misandry don't real."TM
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:55 PM
2

Uh, no it isn't. Feminists have been trying to lay every tragedy at the feet of the MRM for years. It's having little effect.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:30 PM
2

Thanx,
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:09 PM
11

Everybody wants to save western white women, even when they don't need to be saved. It's our national pastime. So, the infantalization of women by feminists continues. Edit: Spelling as suggested below.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 07:08 PM
2

Exceptional circumstances = Woman didn't have a penis.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:43 PM
9

Shocking.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:41 PM
3

The piece is focused too much at the "Gotcha, McIntosh" instead of the substance of the take down.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 10:19 PM
-2

Which begs the question, "Why did Obama have the test done at his physical?" I call bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:57 PM
0

Obamacare doesn't require the Prostate-Specific Antigen test either, probably because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:56 PM
3

They agreed to be pepper sprayed. Nothing to see here. Move along.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 02:33 AM
5

"...Blood-sucking Pedophile Circumcision Ritual..." FTFY
/r/MensRights21/05/14 05:38 AM
-3

A 30 years sentence is ridiculous. It is excessive and unjust. A 1 year sentence would have been enough.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:39 PM
4

The local police had determined not only that Warner was innocent, but that the alleged victim had deliberately falsified her charges. She was charged with lying to police for filing a false report, and fled the state. And yet, the innocently charged man's name is in the article, and the accused liar's name is not. Why?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 04:55 PM
3

If someone were to tell me to check my privilege, I'd say, "Don't worry. I've checked it. It's doing fine."
/r/MensRights19/05/14 11:22 PM
2

First of all, you might try /r/legaladvice. The relevant questions needed to properly address your issue are, (1) what state are you in? (2) order for what? (3) are you and the mother married? (4) does this involve child custody and child support? If you both agree, then why do you need a court order?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 10:50 PM
3

Anonymous accusations are the rhetoric of cowards.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 10:00 PM
1

Wrong thread. Deleted. Sorry for the mix-up.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:36 PM
4

Ladies and gentlemen, "equality", brought to you by the feminist movement. TM
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:35 PM
9

Harris v. Saint Joseph’s University, 13-cv-03937, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:28 PM
84

That article, which is a press release, sucks. What court, what decision, what case is these facts extrapolated from? Edit 1: Harris v. Saint Joseph’s University, 13-cv-03937, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Edit 2: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2013cv03937/479180/55/0.pdf
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:03 PM
-1

I'd reword that, if I were you, to something like, need to allege they were raped..."
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:55 PM
-1

Don't forget they also pushed through Obamacare, with its DV counseling component (but only for women).
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:54 PM
1

"From the same people who brought you the pedophile panic of the 1980's, now comes a campus rape crisis panic for the 21st century!!! Buy one today!" And tell them, the feminist movement sent you.TM
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:51 PM
8

Why aren't the prosecutor, the doctor, and his ex-wife, in jail? The assistant district attorney who tried the case, Elizabeth Loconsolo, is now a deputy attorney for the Nassau County comptroller. She said on Tuesday that she has no second thoughts about her actions in the case. Judge Schweitzer was scathing about Dr. [Nadine] Sabbagh’s testimony: “The only witness who provided evidence of such abuse had lied, and in fact there was no credible evidence his daughter had ever been molested.” "Rap…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 12:36 AM
1

All you need to throwaway a man is to have a white woman accuse a black man.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:18 PM
22

This is impossible. The lawsuit is filed by a contributor to A Voice for Men. There is no activism in the Men's Rights Movement, so feminists would have me believe. The Men's Rights Movement is just an anti-feminist misogynist collective of virgin basement dwellers.<sup>TM</sup>
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:12 PM
2

true
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:31 AM
3

No. I mean she admits to being purposefully offensive. For instance, she calls ginger kids ugly.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 01:35 AM
8

She's a professional provacateur.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 01:24 AM
2

Sociology: The politicized pseudo-science most favored by feminists! Buy one today!!
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:19 AM
2

She did this because he is blonde haired, blue eyed white boy.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:43 AM
1

I find it revolting the entire confidentiality concept, and the fact that the accuser never has to actually face the person she's accused. She's a fucking adult. Put on your big girl panties and act like one.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 01:13 AM
6

Being one's self is not a "privilege". Whiteness is just one of the many variables that one can look at, starting with, for example, one’s place in the birth order, or your body type, or your athletic abilities, or your relationship to written and spoken words, or your parents’ places of origin, or your parents’ relationship to education and to English, or what is projected onto your religious or ethnic background. In other words, the concept of "privilege" is so complicated as to be meaningless…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:10 PM
1

I fucking hate when they bleep out words. That video is unwatchable.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:01 AM
2

Or maybe it shows that the corporate media, formerly the 4th Estate, which passes for news in the United States fails to inform the public, unless it falls into the narrative of the Frankfurt School.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:04 AM
1

As soon as I saw that the author suffers from a severe case of gay face, I knew the piece was garbage.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 11:58 PM
4

A man has a right to try and save his children. Even if it may cost him his life.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 11:44 PM
21

Oh, nnnnnooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwww, it's okay to keep the accused's name secret.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:13 AM
10

The name of every person who sits on one of these disciplinary boards should be mandated to be made public.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 07:10 PM
20

There is no mention of anything that could be characterized as men's groups sticking up for her in the article.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:06 PM
-3

...there is no "war of the sexes" happening... Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:42 PM
4

Bingo!
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:40 PM
3

The problem I have with this notion is the flippancy which abortion and adoption are thrown around in this argument. There are major mental and physical repercussions to these actions. From twoxchromosomes, about a woman proud of her abortion: "I don't feel like a bad person. I don't feel sad. I feel in awe of the fact that I can make a baby-I can make a life. I knew what I was going to do was right, because it was right for me, and no one else. I just want to share my story"
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:27 PM
5

I sure as shit don't want to pay extra taxes because some schmuck doesn't want to wear a condom. Sounds like a good reason to be against Obamacare.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:23 PM
41

Mr Justice Fulford...described Boots as 'someone who delighted in being a mother' I don't think that means what you think it means. Although the results of Mrs Boots's actions were profoundly tragic given the loss of two young lives, what occurred was not criminal activity in the sense that expression is normally understood... ...in that Mrs. Boots is a woman.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:16 PM
2

Un. Fucking. Believable. As someone whose prosecuted sexual assault cases, the facts as described, if true are appalling. There is someone in the same room, in the bunk above, she spends the night, she doesn't report it for 5 months and she doesn't want him to see her allegation. Are you fucking kidding me?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:10 PM
16

If she'd ever look up from the computer screen, stop playing skyrim and leave her parents' basement...
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:51 PM
9

It actually wasn't, until you showed up.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:49 PM
1

You're quite right. Now consent can be withdrawn after given, days later after the sexual encounter, and twitter causes PTSD - blah blah blah.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:41 AM
15

Because boys have so much male privilege, that it's not really important. Girls, on the other hand, blah blah blah, patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:27 PM
2

If you "just realized it", it wasn't sexual assault.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 08:21 PM
2

How the fuck did that guy become an officer?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:58 PM
3

So. Much. Privilege.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:55 PM
-2

Assault is an attempted battery.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:32 AM
2

Assault, in most jurisdictions, is an attempted battery. Yelling at someone is not battery.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:24 AM
134

"Arrest the man" (predominant aggressor laws), brought to you by the - "We help men, too" - Feminist Movement.TM
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:05 PM
7

If you're quoting Michael Kimmel in your article, it probable has nothing to do with helping regular Joe's. It has more to do with redefining what are acceptable expressions of manhood, include femininity and traditional Ashkenazi Jewish masculinity, as advocated by Kimmel, Harry Brod etc.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:49 PM
6

I assume sororities will be co-ed as well. What is it with women being such control freaks?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:46 PM
2

Mean while, in the United States, the hipster millennial youth are fighting the good fight to be stoned anywhere.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:38 PM
75

Obama is a piece of garbage. I am sorry I voted for him.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:39 AM
2

These White House encouraged ("encouraged" with extreme prejudice) changes to Title IX are obviously based upon discriminary intent against men. They are pushed by feminists who repeatedly and systematically lie about statistics, use conjured up advocacy research, redefine common terms like "rape" (you'll be surprised to know that "rape" is defined by the CDC to include attempted rape) and "patriarchy" and create phoney theories, including "rape culture". If anything screams gender based discrim…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:07 PM
14

Here's something you should know, Obamacare does not mandate that vasectomies be covered, although it does mandate tubal ligation be covered. Luckily, you're now paying equal premiums for less services.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:01 PM
0

That's "white man" to you, sugar britches.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 05:45 PM
1

Uh, how bout you shove it up your ass?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 05:34 PM
3

Neither is anonymity for the accuser.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:20 AM
1

She didn't admit to anything of the sort.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:07 AM
1

BTW, did you read the story? He was not a "sperm donor," as that term is understood, and as you are trying to paint the situation. She had long wanted to be a mother, according to a family member. But pregnancy attempts with Mr. Patric did not go well...They decided in 2009 (at a time when they were not romantically involved but still friendly) to pursue artificial insemination...The boy’s middle name is Theodore, a nod to Mr. Patric’s family heritage...The baby eventually helped rekindle a roma…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:02 AM
1

"Sperm donors are not legal parents" Tell that to this guy.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:55 AM
2

"The genetic connection means nothing" You're apparently correct, according to government, that DNA doesn't matter in either the establishment or disestablishment of fatherhood. My favorite story is of the man who was lied to by his wife about a child being his, then left him for the biological father, and now he is paying child support to a biologically intact family. And it's people like you that are perfectly fine with this sort of situation. You're argument is bullshit. The genetic connectio…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:42 AM
9

Which Maimonides himself stated was one of the very purposes of the procedure: "Similarly with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for it is, in my opinion, the wish to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible."
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:21 AM
32

I love how easy it is to be deemed the father for child support purposes, even if you never had a relationship with the child and have no genetic connection. This guy has both the relationship AND the genetic connection, but a court says he's not a father. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:03 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 11:55 PM
2

:)
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:23 PM
2

Femitheists have control of the White House on gender issues. Their mendacity is of no moment, apparently.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:06 PM
22

"Women should be able to do whatever they want. But, society has no right to expect women to have responsibilities - reaponsibility and accountability is a man's job." This message brought to you by the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:45 PM
0

I agree.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:14 AM
1

Oh. My. Gawd. Look at that fat fuck. "[I spend] way too much time on social media..." Uh, that's because yer pretty much a homely loser.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:10 AM
5

Good question. I read your comment and was like, "What the hell is this guy talking about," until I reread my post.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 08:50 PM
3

Perhaps it's taking so long because of systematic feminist interference.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:01 PM
16

This is just a calculated political manuever to try to fire up young single women to turn out for the midterm elections, just like the 77 cent bullshit. The Obama administration is willing to slander young men for political purposes. Edit: me to men
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:56 PM
2

...all three accounts are unreliable... As a matter of law, if such is the case, the defendant walks. If the jury is not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant walks. Furthermore, the defendant doesn't even have to state his side of the story.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:24 PM
1

At least it's being picked up by the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:06 PM
2

It's a brilliant idea, actually.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:28 PM
-6

Not only has the White House sold its soul to the anti-democratic crony-"captialist" banks, abandoned the middle class, shredded the Bill of Rights, and corroded net-neutrality, it is a fully owned subsidiary of the faith based, ideologically driven feminist movement (who just so happen to hate men). I will never vote again for a man who grew up in a single mother household.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:50 PM
3

Michael Kimmel is a vile, effeminate, jackass. It's amazing to watch him debate women, like Christina Hoff Sommers or Hanna Rosin - he's so fucking submissive when dealing with women I want to do him Brooklyn style.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:24 AM
0

Paul Elam and his website do a hell of a lot of real activism. He's "in your face" and unapologetic. He does good work.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:21 AM
-7

That guy didn't own anybody. He comes out looking like a petty asshole who personalized the debate.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:20 AM
-6

Your basically a jackass, yo
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:48 PM
10

Bill Maher is a Jew, a demographic that often has a biased agenda toward circumcision. Universal circumcision medical advocates are disproportionately Jewish doctors, or perverted fetishists. Circumcised penises look mutilated/scarred.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:32 AM
11

Because feminists are women's advocates. They don't care about "equality". The concept of equality is used to justify their advocacy, in spite of contravening reality.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:28 AM
-17

This fantasy that there is a women on men rape crisis is absolute balderdash. To be fair, there is not a men on women rape crisis either. But, trying to argue that men are regularly victims of rape is laughable. The victim Olympics has reached an absurd level.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:26 AM
2

"Patriarchy" - No such thing.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:37 PM
2

This woman actually starts off her screed with five paragraphs of analyzing the Wizard of Oz, the movie from the 1930's. What an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:08 AM
-2

Freeze Peaches.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:39 AM
10

Literally, no. Figuratively, maybe.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:08 AM
1

Feminism.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:11 PM
12

People that say offensive sex related stuff at most jobs get discipline/fired. - if they're men, of course.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:37 PM
-9

I'm in a long term marriage - don't be pessimistic.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:05 PM
1

Unfortunately, Poe's law still is applicable, even in The Onion. Another ready example of "rape culture," brought to you by the feminist movement. TM
/r/MensRights23/04/14 11:10 PM
9

She's accused. Let's not demonize the woman, yet.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:06 PM
9

Harvath sounds like a psychopath.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:58 AM
-5

"Because [we're] so fucking good. That ain't no shit, neither."
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:41 PM
1

That's a dumb thought experiment.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:40 PM
0

gays are not even part of this. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. The "pre-existing condition" part and all the STD/HIV stuff is for the gay community. Straight men don't even get many of the tests/counseling they are paying for, but men "at higher risk" do get them, i.e. gay men. -Gays the military -Women in combat roles -Gay marriage These were Obama priorities. Obamacare is a giveaway to his base at the expense of young men, who pay for services they don't get.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 04:57 AM
1

I don't work with ideologues that base their assumptions on false premises and support them with bogus advocacy research.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:58 PM
-4

The author looks like he needs a testosterone transfusion.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:34 AM
-7

Nuke Sweden.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:33 AM
7

Feminist indoctrination camp.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:13 AM
3

Obamacare was a calculated political law to appeal to Obama's base. Women and gays.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 10:05 PM
0

Uh, no you don't. Truth is truth.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:21 AM
-1

Women generally are not that dangerous.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 04:17 PM
-1

I agree.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 04:13 PM
16

The Democratic Party has sold its soul to radfems. The are perfectly willing to sacrafice young men with phoney issues and made-up advocacy research generated by ideologues, for calculated political purposes. Look at Obama's Office for Civil Rights in the Dept. of Education or Obamacare.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:38 PM
1

And also 18-20
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:06 PM
15

This is, and has been, obvious from the moment I started hearing rumblings about 77 cents from the White House.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:06 PM
31

If Marcott thinks 96% of MRA's are under 25 years old, she's a moron.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:25 AM
6

Listen to the Cracked Magazine... Stopped reading right there.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:40 PM
5

I wouldn't take it just so that I could be "under suspicion."
/r/MensRights14/04/14 09:54 PM
22

This is impossible. There is no activism amongst MRA's, so feminists would have me believe.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:31 PM
15

Woot!
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:30 PM
3

It's an emasculated country, like Sweden and Norway.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 04:54 AM
5

Yo, genius, he's not talking about modding. He's talking about cupcake what's her name interfering with this subreddit. Bitches be crazy.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 12:48 AM
3

Bingo!
/r/MensRights14/04/14 12:47 AM
-1

I see no problem with any of it. You can refuse as well.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:57 PM
1

GTFO SRS shitbag.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 12:54 AM
9

She's probably a feminist hero.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 02:43 AM
1

You forgot: ???? Profit!
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:11 PM
1

Woot!
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:09 PM
2

If a woman tells you do do something, you better gaddam well better do it because feelings and rape culture. Fucking entitled little piece of garabe.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:06 PM
39

The reason some women, not just feminists, hate porn is because porn shows sexually appealling women willingly enjoying sex without some sort of socially acceptable compensation. They want to limit men's sexual expression. So they patholigize it, and try to make it socially unacceptable, at the same time liberating women's sexuality.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 03:35 PM
2

I'm not outraged. They weren't "forced" to do it. This is traditional college hijinx (that may be the first time I've used "hijinx" in a sentence).
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:56 PM
-1

Hillary has no chance.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:39 PM
1

If you scroll through the student-teacher sex scandal pictures, it is weird how many women have sex with "14 year old" students. Why 14? Edit: 10 out of approximately 35 teachers had sex with 14 year olds. a few with 13 year olds. at least a couple with 12 year olds. And at least one with an 11 year old.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:53 AM
4

Feminists want more women in tech because they are control freaks, and don't like that something works fine without getting their permission.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:33 AM
-2

In sum and substance, men's rights are about awesome sauce, lightly slathered over bacon, that has been marinated in SRS leg beard tears, and roasted on a spit over an open flame, with a butter braise.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter