TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ck2875 Archive

View 8 posts and 35 comments by ck2875 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

it means nothing because no one knows what it is. sounds a lot like the upper / unobtainable rankings of scientology.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:27 AM
1

"It's a potentially dangerous and bad idea," the spokesperson said, citing research supporting "single gender programming" which says that girls learn best in an all-girls environment when it comes to scouting. "It is inherently dishonest to claim to be a single gender organization while simultaneously endeavoring upon a co-ed model. A shift to a co-ed model suggest that you may no longer believe in the research supporting single gender programming. To reiterate, Girl Scouts believes in meeting …
/r/MensRights23/08/17 12:40 AM
2

And yet, they have ads, we don't Maybe you aren't talking about Reddit's ad platform but like them pushing sponsored posts or something, but doesn't all of Reddit have ads unless the sub is quarantined? I'm not sure how advertising on here works since it is hidden because I paid for Reddit Gold (a questionable investment on my part I suppose). I haven't ever really paid attention to where ads show up and where they don't, but I was under the impression that mods could get in trouble with admins …
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:25 PM
16

In case people don't remember this jewel from 4.5 years ago... http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/men-working-sign-deemed-sexist-ohio-college-demands-work-halt-article-1.1213388 An Ohio community college demanded that a construction crew stop working on campus until it removed a “Men Working” sign that an administrator deemed “sexist.” Sinclair Community College in Dayton, Ohio, made the call in mid-November after a female employee raised concerns that the construction company’s sign was t…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:08 PM
3

It just annoys me to see people politicize this subreddit. Men’s Rights shouldn’t be viewed as a left vs. right issue, but something that affects men regardless of political affiliations. Just because the extreme feminists tend to be far left, people seem to want to attack anyone who is left leaning as a SJW who wants to fuck over all men when that simply isn’t the case and plenty of people on the left care about Men’s Rights.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:55 PM
10

/leftist Not everyone here is centrist / right / far right. I'm personally about as liberal as you can get, very much support men's rights, and yet I'm being lumped into vast generalisations on a Men's Rights sub. It's off-putting and alienating. Equating anyone who leans left with this shit is why r/MensRights has increasingly been being viewed and dismissed as a right-wing conspiracy subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:40 PM
3

Not hyperbole. I just went through their Charlottesville thread. Didn't see anyone equating Men's Rights with the Holocaust. Do you have a link to them collectively saying that over there or was this just hyperbole?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:25 PM
2

If anyone wonders why they're experiencing deja vu, here is yesterday's thread where this image was posted to r/mensrights. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6td9dc/this_restaurant_in_san_diego_has_two_bathrooms/
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:21 PM
3

I don’t know if there were any instructions given on what counted as “drunk enough to not be able to consent”. It was an online survey, so I imagine it was just up to the person to determine whether they felt they were able to consent or not. I don’t know for sure, but I doubt it would be automatic in the sense of “OMG. Becky just took a sip of my Smirnoff Ice and now can’t consent even though she just asked to go to my room”, but more of a spectrum of whether they had the mental capacity/contro…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:39 PM
1

YongeArcade says, "if they measured it by the same standard as the men ( forced penetration ) it would be about the same?" Here's the Time magazine article, "Setting the Record Straight on '1 in 5'", where two of the study's researchers go through the reasons why it's inappropriate to use the '1 in 5' stat, but also answer the question of how they measured sexual assault in their study and what the stat would be for 'rape only' "the 1-in-5 statistic does not include victims who experienced only …
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:44 PM
3

How have 1/5 women been sexually assaulted when less then 1/33 men have attempted rape. Point of clarification: OPs graphic is not saying those men attempted rape or raped anyone. It says 1 in 33 men have either had someone attempt to rape them (the male) or rape them to completion.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 12:07 AM
2

Did you not read his original post? Yes. I read it. He was fucked over by the "mother" How? Because she 'ditched him' and slept around? Yeah, that sucks, but who cares? is pretty sure he isn't the father Not exactly a scientific or legal standard for determining paternity. He has every right to break into a happy dance when he finds out he isn't the father. Sure. Just don't go on national television programme and exploit a child in the process. Why would he want to be attached to that type of wo…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 10:56 PM
13

Wait. Are we now upset that sexual awareness campaigns also recognize male rape victims? 1 in 33 men are victims of attempted or completed rape. How is this insignificant?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:45 PM
5

How the fuck do I get on Maury so I can get the paternity test results on TV and I can bust into a sweet little dance celebration when I find out this kid is not mine. No need to be an arse about it. Just get a paternity test without exploiting your potential child on national television. So I tell her I moved to another state and she starts yelling at me and said if I don't come and be an active part of my child's life then she'll see me in court and get as much money as she can possibly get fo…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:41 PM
5

Le sigh Subreddit gets upset from being compared to alt-right / hate / political / circle-jerk groups. Subreddit downvotes you for saying to take measures to distance the sub from those groups to avoid any comparisons. I don't get reddit logic on some things.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:00 PM
2

Took me a minute to spot the difference. One is "bbc.co.uk" and the other is "bbc.com"
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:01 PM
1

(Trying this again since apparently linking to twitter got my first comment attempt removed) To be fair... that was the original title of the article before the Guardian updated it. This wasn't an OP trying to suppress the fact that one of them was a woman. You can see the original title embedded in the Guardian tweet from when the article first published. twitter (dot) com/guardian/status/895283217690963971
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:54 PM
5

To be fair, no one should be attacking anyone's children, or bringing them into social media spats. Even if she's doing it herself to others, I don't understand why that anti-feminism website needed to fight fire with fire if they had an issue with her doing it to others. It just makes them look petty, and makes them no better than she is by engaging in the same tactics.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 12:07 AM
7

the caps lock?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 10:09 PM
3

Yeah, it's a bit weird to post a photo of an article IMHO. Here you go: Daily Wire Link: http://www.dailywire.com/news/18799/usa-today-complains-about-lack-women-and-no-lead-john-nolte Original USA Today Review: https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2017/07/17/review-christopher-nolan-excellent-dunkirk-explores-heroism-innovative-fashion/482574001/
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:48 PM
12

Uhh... can you imagine the outrage if a man wrote the following about women? Julie Chen: ”I think the most refreshing thing about working with women is that there's this girl club mentality when we're together as a group. It's like this exclusive club where we cackle and laugh, and bond, and gossip, and we talk about gross things that guys don't want to talk about. Any time we've had a guy guest co-host at The Talk table, it's just different. It's not as fun, because he can't relate to the thing…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 11:39 AM
2

Yeah, I skimmed over the fashion aspects. I found this interesting though: "A 2016 American YouGov poll discovered that younger American men are less likely than older ones to identify as totally masculine, with only 28% of men between 30 and 44 and 30% of 18 to 29-year-olds rating themselves as "completely masculine," compared to 65% of over 65 men." and also this: With masculinity, it seems nothing is ever clear-cut. One man's macho hero is another man's gay icon; one man's sissy is another ma…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:04 PM
1

An interesting look into shifting societal expectations of men and masculinity.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:43 PM
2

Nothing has changed in r/mensrights and people can still ask questions here. Then I honestly don't see the need for it publicising that sub. If people are naturally coming here to post questions and that's okay, then it seems a bit pointless to point traffic somewhere else. It just creates confusion, and someone asking a question about MR would be better served by having their post seen by 150,000 people rather than 185.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 01:54 PM
4

I don't know how much of a pay wall that is. I literally just clicked "close" on the upper left of the pop up asking me to subscribe and it let me read the entire article. Edit: Looking into it some more it looks like the Globe limits the number of articles you can read for free per month, similar to the NYT.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:32 PM

there is no question that Liberals have done absolutely nothing to protect human rights in western countries when it is violated by Muslims. Never said liberals did fuck all to help. They don't. I was just saying that protecting the rights of children shouldn't be made into a political issue and used to point blame at one another to further a political agenda. That much can only be denied if you're completely ignoring reality or have an agenda of your own. My only agenda is to protect the rights…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:16 PM

It is xenophobic to use fear mongering and say that liberals are allowing Muslims to import those practices into the United States. It's a thinly veiled attempt to say fuck any refugee seeking asylum.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 01:57 PM

propagated by the same shitty cultures that these liberals dickheads are trying to import. Xenophobic much? This shouldn't be a political issue where you feel the need to fling shit at liberals (or conversations), or otherwise perpetuate the pick-a-team mentality. It should be about protecting the basic human rights of any and all children.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 01:11 PM
5

I'm a guy btw but that changed when I went and lived in a better neighborhood. Uhhhh... I don't think that says what you think you said.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 03:35 AM
10

It's not painful. Mitosis is a thing.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 06:35 PM
8

There's /r/foreskin_restoration, for anyone interested.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:41 PM
5

1.) Sorry for the insanely long title. 2.) Reddit thread for the original article is here. 3.) If you don't feel like wading through her new article to find it her response... Critics a bit snippy In my column last week, I confessed that I’m Team Circumcision, which pissed off Team Foreskin. “Your disregard for victims reminds me of rape apologists and Holocaust denialists,’’ reader Carrie Arnese wrote in an email. “Intactivists’’ are men who feel mutilated from having the foreskins snipped from…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:06 PM
2

I'm assuming she'll likely see emails related to this article and delete them without reading Yeah, I tend to agree with you there. Good idea on writing the editor instead.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:41 AM
8

If anyone cares to, you can email the author by clicking her name in the original article.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 07:11 PM
20

"I can’t help but agree with the babe characters on the TV show “Sex and the City” who, with the exception of slutty Samantha, enthused that shafts devoid of hoods were more pleasant to gaze upon and touch than intact ones." "I just hope that guys who spend their lives feeling wounded by circumcision, and the women who enable them, find new hobbies." Got to love a female author shitting on men for being upset they had their genitals permanently altered without their consent. edit: ugh. i made a …
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter