TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ckiemnstr345 Archive

View 1 posts and 466 comments by ckiemnstr345 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

False Accusationckiemnstr345/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:25 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's because of private prosecutions. People can force the prosecutors into enforcing the law.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 01:53 AM
31

1/10 people murdered in Spain are women. It's a travesty I say!!! A travesty!!!
/r/MensRights01/04/20 12:31 AM
5

But I've been repeatedly assured that Andrea Dworkin has had no lasting affect on the feminist community. /s
/r/MensRights27/02/20 11:07 AM
12

It's the Duluth Model's Power and Control graphic. This was invented by feminists back in the 80s to cement the domestic violence discourse into the male perp/female victim dialogue.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 11:28 AM
2

This is one subject Republicans straight up lie about a lot. The majority of people on government assistance aren't jobless, they are working one job and getting minimum wage (most likely not getting 40 hours a week). There is a reason that when you get hired to Walmart their HR department actually has it where they will fill out all the required documentation for welfare, food benefits, housing assistance, as well as medicaid. Most states have it where if you are not working at least minimally …
/r/MensRights05/09/19 10:32 AM
1

It's an ad so Reddit doesn't really care too much. It's the same as White Nationalists posting an ad on Black Lives Matter videos on Facebook and YouTube.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 09:29 AM
1

Here is the NAACP's page on lynching in the US. They don't sugar coat what was done and by whom like some other feminist sources so it's a good place to go to.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 07:49 PM
20

This is why when you bring up the lynchings in the US before WWI feminists tend to go eerily silent. Around 30% were for accusations of rape and it drives them mad when you point it out to them.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 09:38 AM
19

It's also in the same vein of the emotional labor argument that feminists love to throw around. Everything a woman does is emotional labor but nothing a man does in a relationship is so women are always doing the most emotional labor in a relationship.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 07:58 PM
9

It's not manslaughter/murder though. England and Wales have had Infanticide on the books for nearing 100 years now. This means that women that kill their kids get super lenient sentences since it's been institutionalized that when women kill their own children they aren't at fault.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 02:33 AM
3

Remember the future is female. This is still treated like a good thing even though it's a dog whistle to reduce the male population to 10% of the overall human population.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:46 PM
-3

Stop being so cuntfused about what Notch was doing.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:33 AM
6

Just say you'll stop mansplaining the second they are no longer cuntfused.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 01:11 AM
1

Look into Andrew Yang if you aren't being facetious. He wants to start fixing some of the issues that predominantly affect men with real solutions that will actually help.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 02:23 AM
25

That's why Yang's solution is to just pay them off. The real problems start when young men have no hope and no food. Yang wants to keep the no food portion out of the equation to keep things civil.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:06 PM
7

1/3 of all lynchings in the US were done at the behest of white women since they reported being raped. This means that feminists are actually in support of a large portion of lynchings since women would never lie about being raped.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 03:30 AM
12

All diversity means is no white men. 100% white women is considered diverse while 100% white men is not.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 02:19 AM
1

Sesame Street was never a utopia and never meant to be. You're thinking of Fraggle Rock. That was Henson's socialism propaganda show.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 11:07 PM
4

What's interesting the way you change the pitch of an oboe is almost the same way you do it on a flute. The biggest difference is the fact that the oboe has what is known as a double reed which makes it significantly more difficult to play than the flute.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:19 AM
3

What really pisses me off about this is then feminists go on to say that gender outreach ins't a zero sum game when it was feminism that set it up as such in the first place.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 03:26 AM
7

At this point I just assume that any statistic that a feminist or one of their mouthpieces puts out is wrong in some manner. Feminists really have to twist statistics to make it seem like women are the victim of anything at this point.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 12:17 PM
13

Nope. Judges will still be allowed but only with the correct training. As in the training will be done by feminists and remove the innocent until proven guilty portion.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 10:09 PM
16

Here is a PhD thesis stating that the scientific method is in fact racist/sexist. That means an academic adviser had to ok the thesis in the first place for it to get that far.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 10:16 PM
9

Tim Poole was a legitimate journalist once upon a time. He worked for Vice News (back when Gavin McInnes still owned half of Vice) and some other new media news agencies before he left because of having to spin everything for clicks. He's not exactly some rando on YouTube.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 06:04 PM
5

It is the media's fault when they report falsehoods and people lose their trust though. When the New York Times employs a racist misandrist on their editorial board it's hard to take them any more seriously than The Daily Stormer.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 01:36 PM
2

She's quoting fucking Dworkin unironically and not getting questioned about it.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 02:33 AM
6

I view it as the commentator trying to actually reach the author since the author is so far up feminism's ass that using normal speech wouldn't actually get through the filters the author has up.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 06:56 PM
13

What's interesting is that false accusations still dis-proportionally affect black men in the US. Just hit back with if you should believe a white woman accusing a black man since that is the most likely false accusation around.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 09:07 PM
3

Funnily enough the Wiki article is a decent start. It does go over the model in pretty good detail.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 08:32 PM
26

Men in the US at least are starting to vote against feminism. The biggest problem is that a lot of people get complacent with voting and only a massive upheaval will get someone out of their standard voting habits. This is why Trump didn't win by getting more votes than Romney but won because Democrats simply stayed home.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 12:01 PM
322

Sometimes I think that the hate feminism gets overblown. Then I remember such gems as the Duluth Model, blocking of a council on men and boys for the executive branch in the US, blockage of the Equal Rights Amendment in the US, the White Ribbon org in Australia, and the list goes on and on. Once I remember all of that my hatred grows even bigger. Feminism isn't a force for progress or good in any society. All it's there for is to reinforce the male gender role while also repealing any responsibi…
/r/MensRights14/10/18 10:20 AM
4

Tim Pool has gathered some great sources to show why presumption of innocence is so important and not just for trials. What I didn't know is that race is still playing a good deal in convictions on false accusations so this old article by Spiked still stands.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:28 PM
3

Hate speech is not protected under Title IX though. If someone believes anyone on campus is making the campus unsafe, this includes emotionally, for men or women they can file a Title IX complaint. If the university doesn't follow through with an investigation they can lose federal funding.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:56 AM
6

The charge of neglect to obtain assistance during child birth is actually the charge for a mother that knows she is going to kill the infant right after she gives birth. According to the same article Canada also has infanticide laws so the mother can kill her infant and only have to spend up to 5 years in prison.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:01 AM
7

It also can't be proved and Kavanaugh has taken the best path by denying the event even took place. This is why feminists want sexual assault/rape out of the normal judiciary and into special courts where the mere accusation is enough to find a man guilty.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:34 AM
2

There could be one way I would let women get lifetime alimony but women wouldn't like it. Since a man would have to keep up with his side of the marriage obligation a woman on lifetime alimony would have to uphold her half of the traditional obligation. She would have to clean the man's household once a week, including laundry. The ex-wife would have to maintain his social calendar as well as buying all gifts (which would be reimbursed through receipts). If she does not agree to these terms she …
/r/MensRights22/09/18 08:52 PM
11

You can use it. Be warned though, feminists will try to twist away from the false accusation angle and go straight for the racist angle. This is so they can keep accusing people and not face any consequences.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 10:36 AM
28

People really need to move away from the Salem witch trials and start using the lynchings in the US. The NAACP actually did some research into it and found that around 30% of the men killed by lynching were accused of rape. Since a woman would never lie about such a crime the accused was automatically guilty and the punishment at the time for rape was death. This meant that the mobs that killed the accused were actually just doing what feminists want done now. Here is an article backing up this …
/r/MensRights22/09/18 10:13 AM
7

Good to know that you think that 30% of lynchings were justified in the US before WWI. The women that accused those men of rape were all telling the truth according to you.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 10:08 AM
18

Precedent would be nice but this money isn't really coming from the endowment or from tuition. Schools carry Title IX insurance in case they get sued (the money was supposed to go to women since everyone thought they were the ones that would use Title IX) and have to pay out. With more and more cases like this coming forward the insurance companies are going to have to redo their calculations and either the school can change their investigations or they will be paying substantially larger premiu…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 12:55 AM
3

They would also probably find some child porn. That will get them on the sex offender registry for at least 2 years so maybe they'll chill after that.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 02:18 AM
6

Just remember that as men any violence you commit upon a woman is to reinforce the Patriarchy and any violence a woman commits against a man is defending herself from the Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 11:25 AM
7

What I find frustrating is that the human body is weird and not everyone experiences things the same way. One woman's menopause isn't another woman's menopause. Someone needs to see what a lot of women's experiences are and relate that to everyone so women can know what is actually menopause and what isn't so they can see a physician about the abnormalities. A man can do this as well as any woman could since it's not about the doctor's single experience but of a multitude of women's experience.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:39 PM
9

This is why people like Paul Elam advocate for jury nullification in all rape trials. There is no way to know if the judge is withholding evidence that shows the defendant as not guilty.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:19 PM
1

In the Navy you are technically an NCO when you get E4. As an E4 in the Navy they actually let you work on your own and you also get to oversee and direct a crew of lower ranking people on tasks as well.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 10:35 PM
2

I would love to see a full deep dive into each area that was briefly covered in The Red Pill honestly.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 10:07 PM
5

Counter top drying racks are so 1990s. The new hip drying racks are all in sink drying racks which this one obviously is. You can tell by how little actually fits in the drying rack.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 10:07 AM
11

Tell me how exactly Trump is a racist? I mean a real action that Trump took to disadvantage non-white people or plain rhetoric he said not some supposed dog whistle.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 11:04 AM
16

He's also racist for voting for people that he believes will help him over the people that think he's evil.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 09:43 AM
25

She will no longer be getting the man's child support payments so in fact she is the real victim. /s
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:12 AM
1

You're wrong about getting a pass due to trauma for shooting someone. The battered wife defense is pretty well established in the US so women can basically kill their husbands at any time and claim he was abusive and get away with it.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 11:18 AM
17

What I don't understand is why people aren't actually more worried about this. This is how groups like Boko Haram continue their existence. Get young kids, indoctrinate them, and then when they get older they have a sizable army to continue their terrorist campaigns.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:39 PM
2

Yes men should be encouraged to come forward when they are raped by women. Then maybe we can actually move forward on sexual assault as a society since it will be everyone needing to support everyone else instead of women demanding men do what they've always done and mold society to the benefit of women. Needlessly gendering issues within a society only makes resolving the issue take a lot longer since there will be one gender who will fight the steps going forward since they're either ignored o…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 02:20 PM
7

Feminists believe themselves to be rational is the issue though. They have deluded themselves through revisionist history and misleading statistics into thinking that men are evil and oppress women just by existing. This is why they applaud all male exclusionary spaces while at the same time decrying male spaces as misogynistic.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 11:08 AM
2

So you would be okay with women losing the ability to make men intervene on their behalf? That's what you are arguing for and I would totally support that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 11:28 AM
1

There was a point in history where the word of the accuser was held above reproach and an accusation was enough to convict a man of rape or anything else. It happened in the US before the '60s in the South and around the US before WWI. One small caveat is that the accuser had to be a white woman and the accused had to be a black man. The estimation is that around 1/3 of all lynchings in the US where the victim was a black man was because he was accused of rape. This is why there actually is any …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 09:29 PM
1

Glad to see you believe 30-40% of all lynchings of black men were justified. Should I bring the rope and you find the tree or are we just going to do it in the town square like back before WWI?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 06:38 PM
0

But we are going against a religion that people didn't logic themselves into. You must use the rhetoric of the religion at the start to make people second guess the principles of their religion.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:54 AM
2

She was also starting to talk about it when she was interviewed. I think that was the action that forced the UK feminists at the time to harass her out of the UK. If she would have kept her mouth shut about male victims she could still be living in the UK and seen as the true hero that she is.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 11:43 AM
6

I'm surprised the MSM is even talking about this. I bet Erin Pizzey is livid, or she might actually be relieved, about the fact that 40 years later people are actually talking about this when she was willing to actually open shelters for men from the start.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:57 AM
7

True but then you can't tell feminists that you'll bring the hoods and the rope if they find a strong tree. The only issue with that comment is the fact that most lynchings happened in plain sight because the man was accused of either rape or murder and they were both capitol crimes back in the late 1800s.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:45 PM
74

While the Salem Witch Trials are tangentially relevant to #MeToo there is a better and more recent example of taking a "victims" words at face value. The lynchings of the black men in the US during the late 1800s and early 1900s is actually a way better example. The majority of lynchings were committed against suspected murderers but the majority of the rest were against "rapists". The mob took the word of the white woman over that of the black man. Now compare that to now. The biggest differenc…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:12 PM
1

This has to be Marry P. Koss's Reddit account. Or he prays to Dworkin to absolved of his sin of being male every night before he goes to be.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 02:59 PM
1

I'm done with you Ms. Koss so have a nice life in your little bubble in which women can't rape men.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 01:02 PM
1

Your "facts" are factually wrong. If you bothered to actually read the entire survey but you probably think like Marry P. "Men can't be raped" Koss so just shove your "facts" and get out of here.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:37 PM
1

So you take the word of Marry "Men can't be raped" Koss as the source of your information? What's interesting is even in that survey it shows that men are as likely to be raped by women at all ages as women are by men if you count the instances in "Other Sexual Violence" as rape (hint: because that's what it is). See this is why MRAs hate feminists so much. If feminists even decide that men can be victims (check Duluth Model in them believing men can't actually be victims only abusers that force…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 11:03 AM
3

Feminism is just the advocacy of making toxic femininity into law. It's a completely separate entity.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:04 PM
9

It came from Men's Liberation groups in the '70s. It was created to contrast healthy masculinity. Feminists did what they always do and co-opted the phrase and dropped the part that actually showed men in a positive light.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:05 PM
4

There have been enough lawsuits against universities now that it's not automatically the man's fault for a drunken hookup. The person that files the complaint first is now considered the faultless.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 10:51 AM
4

Not as much as you would think. There is actually insurance for this type of thing that schools have. It's the same with universities and Title IX payouts. It's not the universities endowment that takes the hit but the university's premiums go up.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:27 AM
5

I know Cenk is their best debater but that doesn't mean he isn't the equivalent of special needs. There doesn't need to be a Ben Shapiro of the left since they are lock step and agree on everything. Once the Word comes from on high it is gospel to the regressive left and there is no further conversation about it.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:00 AM
11

Beating someone that took a yellow 8 seater to school and likes the taste of Windex isn't so hard and isn't that great of an accomplishment.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:38 AM
3

This is why I always say I'll bring the hood and rope if they find a good tree. They get violently upset when I do that though.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:50 PM
8

A lot of feminists still put stock into the Duluth Model. It states that any violence or manipulation that a woman commits while in a heterosexual relationship is in defense of herself against the Patriarchy. This includes the maiming and killing of her male partner.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:40 AM
5

But it would be a step in the right direction of equality. As it stands when a woman consents to sex that's all she is doing but when a man consents to sex he is also consenting to parenthood. Feminists become some of the most ardent pro-lifers the second it comes to men's parental rights. Maybe their tune will change when women are held to the same standard as men.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:14 AM
15

I think alimony is fair if the woman also has to still fulfill her traditional role in a marriage. Basically be her ex-husband's executive assistant and maid. Make sure everything he needs to do is scheduled as well as picking up all the gifts he will need to give to his family for special occasions. She would also have to go to his house and clean every week. I mean a full clean including laundry and any dishes from eating. If the man still has to fulfill his traditional role it's only fair tha…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 01:52 PM
34

If being on the editorial board of one of the largest and most trusted newspapers isn't institutional power I don't know what else could be. The people that like to substitute institutional racism for all racism are really the racists. They are the ones that are just looking for an excuse to hate white people.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:40 AM
2

Classist racists demanded that they obtain the same rights without the responsibilities that their husbands/fathers had. They wanted to keep the vote to rich white people and they didn't want to have to perform public service (mainly the draft) to keep society going and still wanted the vote. This is what the Suffragettes were all about.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:25 AM
1

At least Putin is an equal opportunity assassin. Any type of popular opposition is killed not just women.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:28 AM
9

DeVos already rescinded the Dear Colleague letter but the administration of colleges have power over their male students and they will not give that away. It will take the continued loss of money from lawsuits for this to stop and the Department of Education could speed it along if they stated that any college that violates due process will be fined/sanctioned.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:25 AM
66

Number 1 beneficiary of affirmative action is white women. This is because feminists have convinced people that women deserve minority status even though they are the majority of the human race as well as the majority of college students.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:48 PM
5

They do let feminists hold edit-a-thons though. This is where feminist groups will get together and change entries that paint feminists in a negative light or add stub articles on females through history that really didn't do much. I'm surprised that feminist groups have left the wight feather campaign page alone since it makes them look bad.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:04 AM
9

It's actually in Wikipedia page. I'm surprised it hasn't been edited out.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:21 PM
16

They shamed any male that wasn't in uniform during WWI if he appeared to be of fighting age. They would pressure boys as young as 14 to enlist and a lot of them did.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:17 PM
2

Also it puts all those tasty targets in one place. The men that actually put the parking spots into action are probably secretly predators.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:10 PM
3

The government official that decided Marry P. Koss was the best person to head the rape portion of the CDC's IPV survey needs to be repeatedly raped and told it's not that bad.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 11:51 PM
3

I guess Michael Douglas is a dirty liar and actually got his throat cancer from tobacco use and not from HPV after all. /s
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:07 PM
13

I guess a good percentage of those dead black men hanging from trees up to the '50s were actually justified in being there. /s This is the way to get the SJWs out of this current witch hunt. They get really butthurt when you tell them you'll bring the hood and rope if they just find the tree when they are going off on one of their diatribes about some accusation.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 09:55 AM
13

Hopefully this will actually get Universities to get an outside arbiter to actually go over these cases. Otherwise they will keep paying the male students large sums of money and their insurance might actually get dropped.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:35 PM
9

I guess Juliet Starling was a little too far into the Male Gaze for feminists to really appreciate her. Also the fact that 30% of the enemies were female make the game completely misogynist.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 09:35 PM
3

The sidebar of /r/KotakuInAction has the history of GamerGate if you want to read it from the actual horse's mouth instead of third parties.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 06:53 PM
6

So the normal feminist song and dance but no real action? Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:04 PM
15

In the US men don't legally get the vote until they are listed in the Selective Service records. Many other countries if you don't take your conscription or other national service you don't get to vote as a man. This is why women have the right to vote since they aren't obligated in the continuation of the society while men only get the privilege if they agree that the society is worthy of continuation.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 07:08 PM
50

Women didn't suffer more than men throughout history. Women traded their freedom for safety through most of history. They abdicated their public responsibilities which during that time also meant abdicating their rights. One of the biggest push backs against suffragettes from women wasn't because women thought they were too dumb to vote and shouldn't but rather they were scared that women would have to go through the same meat grinder that men did to get the right to vote. You have to remember i…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 03:09 PM
4

What's interesting is that group also gets butthurt when people don't even know the meanings of the words they use and on top of that they don't even try to educate those same people on what they actually mean.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:17 AM
3

Personally I don't think they really care about the precedent. It was most likely they were scared what would have come out in discovery. If they have some serious skeletons they will do anything to not go to discovery. Also they push a narrative that anyone they label as bad is factually bad and not just their opinion. If they didn't settle and went to trial and defended themselves on the grounds that the list they published was just opinion their entire credibility goes out the window.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:40 PM
18

For purportedly fighting against gender stereotypes feminists do like to reinforce them a lot.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 04:38 PM
7

I would guess that at this point the majority of throat and mouth cancer in men is caused by HPV. Tobacco use is drastically down so that isn't really the cause any longer.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 01:01 PM
4

It was feminism that created this situation in the first place and we all know they can never admit their faults. The crazy thing is that they deny that the Tender Years Doctrine was an early feminist work.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:06 AM
1

The Department of Education controls the purse strings and who controls the Department of Education again? Congress has actually given most of its power away to the Executive Branch at this point just so they only have to show up every other month for a couple weeks.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:06 PM
39

The president can actually fix this pretty easy if he so desired. Dictate that any college receiving funding from federal grants, financial aid, or loans will no longer receive those if the administration portion of the budget exceeds 1%. You would see a lot of the administration positions just disappear.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:03 AM
6

Are you sure you weren't drunk or something when you saw that? Wendy Williams is a pretty big misandrist so this would be way out of her normal character.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:07 PM
9

As long as the women aren't having sex with the men paying it's not prostitution. They are also filming and distributing the material even if that distribution is only 1 person.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:45 AM
12

I think it's time for Swedish men to start self-identifying as refugees.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:01 AM
9

I guess you're a big fan of Hillary Clinton. Remember people that women are the primary victims of war. Or better yet the satirical headline: "World to end, women most affected." People can get over most trauma if given time and resources. You cannot get over being dead.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:55 AM
1

Because it's more important to hurt a man than worry about any collateral damage that causes.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:11 AM
1

That's the thing, they weren't actually able bodied men. The likely hood of a 13-16 year old to survive was drastically lower than actual able bodied men. Also women don't really think about the suffering of their male relatives until it actually happens in front of them. How else would Hillary Clinton get away with stating that women are the primary victims of war?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 09:23 PM
2

Bullying 13-16 year olds to serve in the trenches is evil in my book. As long as a "man" looked old enough he was targeted.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:22 AM
3

Not necessarily. You have to remember California was the pioneer in the 3 strikes rule for felony convictions. So if people from that generation vote and the SJWs don't than he could win.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:51 AM
3

It would be supremely easy to draft dodge as it stands now and still not get a felony on your record. Just show up morbidly obese and there is nothing they can do.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 09:11 PM
5

The US government can't implement a draft for something like a "police action" in the Middle East. They can increase the benefits of joining the Army and Marines but they can't implement the draft. Vietnam isn't far enough in the past for that to happen.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 09:50 AM
15

Now they can be colorist though. Since blacks can't be racist they had to come up with a new word for lighter skin blacks oppressing darker skinned blacks. Also when Asians oppress or are bigoted to other minority groups.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 10:12 AM
1

Nah they just went to the lower income black and latino neighborhoods and asked those guys. Then they dropped all racial demographics from their article and generalize it to all men so they can get their head pats.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:58 AM
2

It's in the wiki on background. That list was not originally gendered so it only affected women. All victim advocacy at that time was for women and all grants were for women.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:55 AM
39

In its original form it prevented any federal funding from going towards any services and studies that showed men could be victims and women could be perpetrators.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 02:25 PM
71

This is really how feminists always operate. The most evil manifestation of this was in the US in the 90s when feminists were able to get the Violence Against Women Act passed. With that act they made it illegal to even see if any statistics went against their claims.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:15 AM
3

There are no infanticide laws in the US. A couple states have tried to get them passed but it never works. This is one area where having a strong enough Christian voting block works in people's favor.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:57 AM
1

I just don't see how getting into bed with Muslims is going to help the Left in most countries. People will see the rise in antisemitism and nothing being done about it and abandon progressive platforms. The swing right is going to be quick and bloody. Either Europe is going to have a second inquisition or Muslims are going to start starving in the streets since they won't be getting any money. The inquisition will keep the Europeans safe while expunging Muslims and making them return to their o…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:45 AM
5

She is part of the most privileged portion of society, attractive white women, no matter how much feminists might protest to it.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:25 AM
1

Seems odd that Australia would have laws against Sugar Daddies and their Sugar Babies while prostitution is legal. Those relationships aren't any more rife for abuse as normal ones or other types of sex work. He could work around it by just giving his Sugar Babies a monthly stipend that is the same as rent he would charge and for food while they are together it seems.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 11:12 PM
3

The female teachers could also just be biased against males and the only way male students can safely affect their professors is through the evals.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 01:52 AM
24

I really don't understand how SJWs can claim this when feminism has been using it since the 60s.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 01:13 AM
1

It will get removed from r/TIL and the user who posted it banned. Depending on who gets to it first at r/news it will either be front page or buried but that is where this kind of thing needs to be posted.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:05 AM
13

If you really want to freak people away from this line of thought is to ask if you need to bring your own white hood and rope or if they'll have them to borrow when you get there. Lynching was legitimized in the US by hiding behind the facade of needing to protect white women from being raped by black men. The backlash is real and instant but it's better to show people where this line of thought goes and hope they actually think about their need for vigilante justice.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 06:31 PM
9

One of the big second wave feminist was in bed with the CIA and even got her magazine MS Magazine funded by them. She denies it though but once you work for the CIA it's hard to stop. Gloria Steinem is the feminist and of course her Wikipedia page downplays it all.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:08 AM
10

Feminism has always been a western rich white woman's game from its inception. The awful thing is even with the veneer of intersectionality, feminism's core is still very focused around western rich white women. Getting quotas in place for boards of directors in companies isn't going to help many minorities but it's sure as hell going help rich white women.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 11:12 AM
11

One of things that would help fix marriage in the west is by making all alimony tax deductible for the payer while a source of income for the person getting paid. The kicker is if the government did that a lot of men would be able to get government benefits since they would be below the poverty line even though they work full time.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 01:39 AM
10

They really really hate the poor. That is why intersectionality ignores class and plays up every other group a person belongs to.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:48 AM
13

Feminism has always been about upper class white women. None of the suffragettes ever campaigned for universal suffrage for women they just wanted the normal landed citizenship to expand to include themselves. 2nd wave got Affirmative Action and its like to fix "historical oppression" and again this mainly helped upper class white women. The current generation of feminists at least put up the smokescreen of intersectionality to appear to be about everyone but all they're really doing still is tr…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:19 AM
26

In the US it's all about the money at this point. It might have started out as a deterrent to masturbation for teenage boys but at this point hospitals get hundreds of dollars per operation.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:46 AM
89

She definitely needs to be reported to Twitter and if she lives in Canada someone from Canada needs to make a human rights complaint.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:21 AM
2

This has been the rules since the 1980s when feminists came out with the Duluth Model and got police departments around the world to adopt it. Men commit domestic violence to control the woman to maintain the patriarchy while any violence a woman commits in a relationship is defending herself from the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 10:02 AM
3

That's not true at all. The caveat is that to get said payday the woman just needs to earn less than her BFF.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:07 AM
15

Personally the only time an accusation should have any bearing on a divorce is if there is an actual conviction in criminal court. As it stands accusations are too easy to use as a weapon in divorce.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 10:54 AM
2

They do not. In most countries with some form of socialized medicine only women get it. The UK is starting to rethink this since throat and mouth cancers are on the rise in men and Canada actually started giving it to boys at the same age as women last year. It's in the affordable care act in the US so insurance has to cover it for both men and women.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:56 AM
3

It's just as effective for men as women age wise. The same strains that cause cervical cancer also causes throat and mouth cancers so men need it just as much as women. It can also cause penis cancers but those are much more rare than cervical cancers.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:25 AM
3

There are 3 strains of HPV that causes cancer in humans. The vaccine protects against those three strains. It doesn't prevent warts though so if you have those you are out of luck.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:59 PM
1

It will never reach girls if the feminist lobby has anything to do with it and they have a lot to do with it. They will continue to squash studies that look at social ills in a gender neutral light and keep the cash flowing to their pet causes.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:29 PM
14

The mess as you described it is here already. The problem is that it really only affects men so society just doesn't care and the feminist and women's lobbies are strong enough to keep it that way.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 11:12 AM
2

I hope that case in Michigan succeeds in the US. If they do get to circumcise girls just as easily as boys it will be a step in the right direction to get all infant genital mutilation banned in the US since the only gender people actually care about are women.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 01:28 AM
12

People still wonder how Hillary lost the male vote so hard in the 2016 election. It baffles me so much how feminists can claim Republicans are against them and never vote for them and then not realize men did the same thing for Hillary.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 01:33 AM
5

They would also have to convict women of manslaughter for each miscarriage as well as assault with intent of severe bodily harm when they drink, are around heavy smokers, as well as when they eat farmed fish.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:59 AM
11

It's not the court. It's the welfare state. A working poor man cannot compete with the government. When a woman is told that she can double/triple the amount of money she can get from the government by not having any contact with the father, the father is gone.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:07 AM
10

I've been through testicular cancer myself and the regimen they use to treat it is pretty good already honestly. If caught early enough there is a 95% chance of a cure and the lowest chance of a cure is 50% (this is even with the cancer getting into the brain) unlike other cancers where if you don't get it in Stage I you are boned. That just leaves awareness honestly. I was lucky in the fact that I couldn't avoid the fact that I had cancer because the testicle was the size of my fist and it felt…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:56 PM
45

I think that's where intersectional feminism comes in. White women didn't actually get what they thought they were going to get when society shifted so they put even more responsibility on men for women's happiness and it's just going to make women even unhappier.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 01:30 AM
1

It's a pretty easy fix in the US actually. Just stop giving states the funds that would have gone to the mother when the father starts paying child support. I'll tell you real quick that the states will stop enforcing that shit real quick.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 01:47 AM
205

The biggest mistake is they based all promotions on a objective data instead of having some a tiny bit of subjective qualities like an interview or the such. If they had any subjective requirements in the promotion the woman would have gotten promoted and the man would have gotten nothing.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:26 AM
4

You don't need to mention the draft in Canada to point out that men are legally discriminated against. All you need to do is point to the explicit exemption in the Human Rights charter of men not being a protected class. If a person/company does discriminate against men in Canada the man cannot bring them in front of the Human Rights charter.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 01:31 AM
7

Feminists needed a way to make this problem larger than it really is and the only way they knew they could do it is by lambasting women that decided to knowingly change their genitals. If they didn't add those stats in most people would rightly ignore the single digit cases every year as a non-issue and feminists can't abide by that.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:22 PM
10

Usually as part of transition trans men get a version of full mastectomies. They would probably be the least likely to get breast cancer out of anyone.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:25 PM
5

Not any longer. Twitch dropped all the pretense when they made the IRL section where people can stream whatever they are doing at the time. Now the booby streamers don't even need to "play" a game.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:08 PM
48

What's interesting about intersectional feminism is that if they attack white men long enough in the US they might actually get what they fear most. They allow every other group to organize and push against the white male and eventually that will lead to white men doing the same. The issue is that the white women that align with their relatives will be the tipping point and a real patriarchy might manifest. It most likely won't lead to violence but it will lead to government spending being drast…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:11 PM
0

It also leaves out all natural abortions as well.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:13 AM
15

I can't imagine what #MeToo would be like under Hillary. It's bad now but I think the US would have been inching really close to somehow having the courts from campus leak out into the real world.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:42 AM
4

Masculinity has been built and will continue to be built around the optimal actions required to attract a mate. Since female feminists don't actually want to take responsibility for this they will never fix what they label toxic masculinity or the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 02:45 AM
5

Most people don't understand that the Suffragettes actually fought against universal suffrage. They were worried that if universal suffrage got any traction women would actually have to take some responsibility in keeping society running. They also didn't want the common rabble to get the vote and wanted to keep it restricted to upper-middle to upper class citizens.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 10:17 AM
2

What's interesting is that this round of id pol has actually backfired finally. Since every other group gets to band together and put their interests first white men have finally started to do the same. The reason this is happening is that whiteness has obtained the level of original sin in MSM so no matter what the white male does he is already sexist and racist.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 09:59 AM
7

He also normally covers all straight up verifiable abusive actions by police no matter who the victim is. He just doesn't like authority figures abusing their power over anyone in society.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:26 PM
6

That's how the US law already works. The complainant doesn't even need to do that much work in the US. State and local Labor Boards do this. An employee brings basic evidence against their employer and the board does all the rest including hiring lawyers and discovery. It is considered on the same level as stolen wages in the US because it is stolen wages.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:24 PM
18

Not really. For labor disputes like this there are labor boards in the state that actually do most of the work so it's not on the employee themselves to file suit. They just need to bring some basic evidence to the labor board and they will do the rest including further discovery. It's considered in the same vein as stolen wages.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 11:38 PM
7

California made the mistake of adding gender to the list of protected classes. This will actually harm feminism in the long run because then women won't be able to discriminate against men as much as they have historically.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 11:09 AM
3

She did get rid of a person with a penis (aka rapist) so she'll be up for several feminist awards and invited to Congress.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:23 PM
14

Don't forget all the boys that are kidnapped in Africa and forced into being soldiers. There used to be a push to deal with child soldiers but it seems like that movement has mostly died out lately.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:20 AM
9

People get really pissed when you point out they would be one of the people in the background of photos smiling around the lynched black man. They try to worm out of it by saying it's different but their reaction points to them knowing it's not.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:02 PM
21

The usual argument is that women don't have the responsibilities that men have to their country and until they do they shouldn't have the same rights.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 12:23 AM
2

True but all the ones that are in positions of power and influence believe it. This means all the actions that the feminist movement goes through with are all predicated on the mindset that gender discourse and support is a zero sum endeavor.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:14 PM
21

Feminists believe that the discussion about gender is a zero sum game. This means that any discussion, support, or money going to men's issues is directly taking that away from women.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:26 AM
10

The majority of people don't really care about something until it directly affects them. This isn't exactly a bad thing either. If we just sat around and worried about the plight of everyone on the planet nothing would get done.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:01 AM
35

Sex negative feminists are some of the most uptight and prudish people on the planet. They traded the fact that women carry original sin and given it to men since all penis in vagina sex is rape. Sex negative feminists still believe that sex is something that men do to women instead of an act that is carried out by both parties involved.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:31 AM
3

The problem is that "liberal" and "progressive" sources cannot print something like that. They will literally go out of business. This is why most MRAs are anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:10 AM
10

She's just cuntfused.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:29 AM
6

The only way that people like Mary P. Koss could get women to be sexually assaulted more than men is to: Not include women raping men. Base the statistic off of lifetime assault. (This is because men's memory will change to not being assaulted while women's will change to being assaulted.) Not include prison rape. Include all unwanted contact with men even tangentially related to a sexual interaction as assault. This is why I personally think that feminism and especially Mary P. Koss are not jus…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:27 AM
3

Sex is not something a man does to a woman. It is an act that both participate in and with an age discrepancy that large when the younger person hasn't been sexually mature for that long for there to be real consent.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 10:35 PM
4

Most "male" leagues are actually gender neutral to begin with. It's just there has never been a woman that could compete on that level.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:39 AM
1

Counter to that argument is WIC and EBT in the US. The two programs a single mother will be using even if she has child support. They have way more restrictions and guidelines than child support and people function just fine in those programs. There needs to be some oversight for the money the custodial parent is spending. As it stands there is just too much freedom to abuse the child support system.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 09:32 PM
1

People still believe Emma Sulkowicz. Feminists will be believe any woman that says she was raped even with video evidence of the act itself proving it was consensual.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 12:22 PM
2

It covers men as well but only in how men cause problems for women.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 10:09 AM
2

This phenomenon was started by feminists when they came up with the "default male" trope in the 60s. If media doesn't explicitly state what gender a person is then the reader can assume the author is talking about a man. This has been expanded to include gender/sexuality so that the "default" person being talked about in media is a straight white male. This is why every group needs to be invited individually.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:35 AM
1

That award will never go to a man. It might go to PoC man once a decade but never a white man.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:29 AM
1

This advert adheres to the feminist Duluth model of DV which most western countries follow. That means the advert is perfectly legal.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 10:06 AM
2

This will not end well. The lessons learned from the French Revolution have been forgotten. Men in the area where this aid is going don't have much of a future to look forward to and adding hunger on top of it is how revolutions start. This will only make the situation worse in those areas.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 10:08 AM
4

Those were the numbers I had on antidepressants. That shit is annoying.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 10:37 PM
6

Or he'll pad the suicide statistics.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:06 AM
9

Look into Mary P. Koss, the lead writer of the US CDC violence survey, and what she believes about male victims of female perpetrators if you want a look into real rape culture.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:58 AM
7

It already has a name though. Just use kidnapping. No need to invent a new phrase when the English language has a single word for the action.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 10:31 AM
12

In debates around genital mutilation I refer to MGM as MGM and FGM as female circumcision. It usually leads to not very productive debates though.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 10:11 PM
7

When the system is specifically designed to not help a certain group it hasn't failed but is working as intended. This is especially true in the U.K. where Erin Pizzey wanted to be inclusive back when she started her shelter but feminists ran her out of the country.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 09:24 AM
7

Most were white women trying to save face in their communities. They couldn't exactly say they consented to getting fucked by some black dude so they claimed rape instead.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:08 AM
7

It wouldn't even be that hard to implement. Put the money in an account that the payer can monitor and put restrictions on it like WIC and food stamps.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:02 PM
8

Uh oh. People are trying to discuss the difficulties of being male in political spaces without tying it back to how it affects women. That can't be allowed to happen under feminism's watch.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:52 PM
2

There is a biological service only women can provide though. They can have their own draft but when they are drafted they have to produce so many children. If things go wrong enough for WW3 than getting ahead of the loss of population should be planned for.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:44 PM
3

They made r/mensrants for posts like this. It never really got any traction though so it all stayed here.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:23 PM
9

But you ARE exactly like males in all the feminist literature. You privileged white male. /s
/r/MensRights22/12/16 10:58 AM
4

There's an easier way to assuage these feelings and it wouldn't cost the government a dime. Just force women to have a male escort at all times in public.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:53 AM
5

When all the members of said group whom find themselves in power and can enact policy are misandric pieces of shit, you bet your ass I'm going to judge the entire group on those people. Words on the internet and conversations between people are nice but not very effective at changing society.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 11:05 PM
5

The question is better suited in r/kotakuinaction since that is the main gamergate subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 09:47 PM
7

This is also known as the Duluth model. Many modern feminists argue that it has fallen out of favor in DV circles but they are mistaken. The reasoning behind the Duluth model is still used by the majority of feminists that lobby the government for funding and how police respond to DV situations.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:16 AM
19

I would also urge to not be alone with her when you sever ties as well.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:37 AM
3

Easy access to porn either decreases sexual assault or at the very least has no affect on it. This would lead me to believe that the robots would affect society the same way. This is very bad for the "survivor" industry. They are the ones that are for removal of due process in rape cases and the broadening of the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:03 AM
1

With the re-authorization of VAWA in 2010, it is technically gender neutral. Any shelter that receives federal funds has to treat everyone equally.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:30 AM
5

Even today combat can turn into hand to hand. If you look the sticks are about the size of a riffle.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 06:59 PM
2

There is r/bannedfeminists for that anyway.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:14 AM
6

We infringe on feminists' right to be the only voice in gender activism. To these people feminism also means women. That's their logic.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 11:14 PM
13

I would suggest x-posting this to r/kotakuinaction as well. The only difference is couch it as a breech of ethics on the part of USAToday to get traction and an actual response. This way you can get more people to email USAToday. You can also ask for someone to make an archive.is page for it. I would also suggest you make the archive for articles like this in the future especially if you are going to expose them to people all to willing to censor articles that heavily damage their narrative.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:56 AM
4

They also pair off quickly and don't separate often.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 12:44 AM
3

That's why in my opinion all allegations made in family courts should be labeled maliciously false. That way the testimony is thrown straight out and if the accusations are serious they can use the normal legal system.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 01:20 AM
61

MTV's hatred of men was cemented the day they hired Laci Green as a supposed sexuality expert.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:56 PM
1

I think Paul Elam and Milo Yiannopoulos has proven that going too far from time to time can be affective. The real issue is when that becomes an advocate's only tool at furthering their goals.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:35 AM
7

I wouldn't be surprised if Emma Sulkowitz didn't slither her way on stage somehow.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:27 AM
2

Next step is to make family court judges assume that all accusations made in their court as maliciously false. This would force the complainant to go through the standard judicial system or if they stay in family court they need more proof than the accusers words.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:06 PM
37

Doesn't matter. She has positional authority over the kid so it's still rape. Just like when female prison guards at juvenile detention centers with 18-20 year olds it is considered rape.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:43 AM
7

Hahahahahaha. Oh, you are serious? Let me laugh harder. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Never assume the court will excuse yuou from child support as a man. It's the quickest way to end up homeless or in prison.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:50 AM
2

I'm suprised they actually wrote it out like that. Most MSM outlets would blame the teachers for getting into compromising situations with their students.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:55 AM
4

This is why I think all accusations made in family courts should be labeled maliciously false. This is so the accuser becomes the defendant immediately and any testimony they provide will be ignored. Maybe after a few decades we can go back to normal but as it stands it's too easy to abuse.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:10 PM
2

She opened the first DV shelter for women in the UK. She then stated that a lot of DV is reciprocal in nature. For this crime against feminism she was harassed out of the UK.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:05 PM
7

You've never seen Cyanide & Happiness before?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:23 AM
14

Feminists have made gender advocacy a zero-sum endeavor and it is hurting everyone. They refuse to see it though and is one of the reasons feminism is going down the shitter.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:21 AM
3

Personally I would like all accusations made during a divorce be labeled as false from the start. It would force the complainant to fully defend the accusation with more than testimony from the supposed victim.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:16 AM
5

Also see r/bannedfeminists.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 02:37 AM
6

Sanders' campaign wasn't supposed to happen. Hillary was supposed to run unapposed this primary. The only factor Hillary has that some people view as beneficial compared to Sanders is her vagina.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:32 AM
4

It's similar to how in the US dick is censored if it actually refers to a penis.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:44 PM
2

The mother fucking Patriarchy strikes again!
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:42 PM
2

Christina Hoff Sommers might call herself a feminist but she's been as thoroughly excommunicated from feminism as Warren Farrell has.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 11:47 AM
2

With how much the executive branch's powers have expanded over the last 60 years I wouldn't be so set on how little either could accomplish on their own.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 04:34 PM
4

Janet definitely views society from a more TradCon angle but she is still all for reducing the suffering of men. Unlike feminists the MRAs have to fight all sectors of society so having someone using conservative logic to reduce the suffering of me is only a good thing.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 11:17 AM
11

Why are you resisting?!
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:29 AM
4

Having a misandrist for a mother as a male child should be seen as child abuse. It fucks with your head pretty bad and can end up killing you.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 09:32 AM
3

The reason why this sub doesn't directly link or at least uses a np. link is because MR has to follow the rules or risk getting banned. The opposition to KiA was formed by the lovely ladies over at AMR and the white knights of SRSGaming. Most Redditors have never interacted with that kind of bigotry before. It's good to warn people when posts make it to the front page.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 02:48 AM
5

We are getting louder and people are noticing. The only real issue at the moment is that the MSM is controlled by either feminism or tradcons so getting our message out there will take longer.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:13 PM
1

If the battered wife defense turns into the battered spouse defense I'll be happy.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 11:49 AM
13

If women aren't a protected class why are all women given bonus points in the eyes of affirmative action in the US?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:44 PM
6

And put it into an account where the non-custodial parent can monitor it.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 10:33 AM
18

Women are a protected class in the US so anything that discriminates against them is illegal while anything that supports only women is legal.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 10:29 AM
7

The empathy gap is so wide in the west, men's problems don't really exist to most people. This means any support program that states it is women only is actually women only and legally women only.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 10:25 AM
7

RoK would have to actually claim to be part of the MRM first and not vehemently deny it all the time.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:30 AM
28

Come on guys, she was only defending herself from future abuse. At least that's what the Duluth model says. We should all thank the fine upstanding feminists that wrote that fine piece of drivel. Snark aside, the Duluth model needs to be expunged from society's consciousness before male victims will actually be seen as victims of DV. With the Duluth model still floating around getting a meaningful conviction for crimes like this will be impossible because of the battered wife defense. It's the p…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 03:59 AM
6

NAMBLA and some feminists have been advocating to decriminalize pedophilia since the 60's.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:32 AM
3

NPR actually stands for No Penis Reporting at this point. Gender is one of a few topics where they don't even pretend to get both sides.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 08:32 PM
1

The empathy gap is definitely the number one issue for sure. The best way to combat it is to first define it for people then give concrete examples of it. People will vehemently try to hold onto it because it is ingrained into our culture so hard but keep pushing and showing examples and people tend to come around. The downside of this is you will be called a misogynist. There is no avoiding it in the current public discourse because feminists have done a very good job at convincing the public t…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 12:59 AM
9

Feminists like having rape accusations as a weapon and they will fight tooth and nail to keep that weapon.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 10:09 PM
5

It does encapsulate modern feminism fairly well though. This can be seen by the #HeforShe campaign by the UN Council for Women and Girls. Modern feminists are some of the most rabid enforces of traditional gender roles where the man has to take care of the woman.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 09:57 PM
5

Yes the empathy gap is the largest and hardest hurdle for the MRM to overcome, which ironically is the very first hurdle, but I think it can be done. The MRM existing is a huge first step in getting over the empathy gap and if its members would start pointing it out and discussing how as a society we can move past it will make all future endeavors possible.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 10:31 AM
15

When the "fringe" are the ones enacting legislation and changing public discourse than they are no longer the fringe. They are the driving force of the group and anyone that denies this is in denial and needs to get their head out of their ass.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 10:45 PM
4

Then they expect men to fix it even though the problem is completely in their own control and men can't actually affect it at all.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 10:55 AM
6

Less money for the lawyers through legal fees and the states due to loss of federal grants for child support. Loss of power for women since they can't hold their children as pawns to be used over their husbands. There is plenty bad with that if you look at it the right way.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 10:51 AM
14

So it's a standard feminist study. Feminism needs to get out of the social sciences now for them to be taken seriously within the next century.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 02:50 AM
1

It's pretty standard operating procedure at this point to never look at men in those kinds of studies. Men's lives don't matter and how well they live them doesn't matter. All that matters is that men continue to let themselves be used by society and spit out on the other end broken or dead.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:07 PM
50

Feminism's number one tool is fear. They need women afraid so feminism can protect them from the world. This is why feminists cling to the Patriarchy™ like a man out in the desert clings to his canteen.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:10 AM
2

The guise of misogyny in any social group is just as bad as real misogyny in a social group. Modern feminists have realized this and are milking it to keep their cash cow alive as long as possible. They have to peddle their narrative otherwise women will find out that tech isn't a misogynistic space and feminists won't be needed any longer to "consult" with companies. This is also why modern feminists push to have women stay weak and childlike throughout their lives. If women actually grew up an…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 11:00 AM
2

The less anyone talks about feminism the smarter they sound since they don't sound like a raving conspiracy theorist.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:33 AM
1

The proud womyn with the Women's Studies degrees must try to make a living somehow. One of the easiest ways at this point in time is shitting on men and the MRM.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 11:30 PM
2

These campaigns have an affect though. They scare the insecure, impressionable guys away from dating women. It's easier for those guys to stay away from women than risk being accused of being a rapist.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 09:24 AM
7

This is just another sample of the true damage that the teachings of feminism has started to bring on society. With the way they keep going on and on about toxic masculinity and how misogynistic our society is it's not wonder that certain demographics of women are starting to become afraid of men. If they are allowed to keep speaking on this eventually it will start to affect society as a hole instead of academia and certain aspects of the press.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:50 PM
26

To be fair the Duluth Model tells them that is how relationships work. Feminists know that other feminists wouldn't lie and push a sexist agenda to further their cause.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:32 AM
1

This is why the fetish of modern feminist infantilizing women is so dangerous. Everything modern feminism is doing is making women weaker and more reliant on men and not letting them actually accomplish something on their own. If women were actually taught to suck it up and just do their tasks society and women would actually be better off.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:30 AM
15

Like women would want those filthy raping pedophiles anywhere near their kids. /s That mentality is the number one factor stopping men from getting into any type of child care. We as a society must set aside this mindset if we are going to let fathers be fathers to their children and to let men be allowed into primary schools as teachers.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:05 PM
16

Women will be scared to report rapes though. Just not how SJWs think they will. Women will be scared to use rape charges as a weapon and that's something that feminists and SJWs have worked very hard to get into society and they want to keep it that way.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:02 PM
13

At least with conservative puritans they believe in both genders taking responsibility for sex. With liberal puritans it's always the man that ultimately has to take responsibility for his child while the woman can do whatever she wants.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:49 AM
2

People that do that sort of thing hide behind those statements being in jest. If men can't hide behind saying things are jokes than women can't either.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 10:57 AM
2

I think people need to start shaming the neo-puritans of sex negative feminism for what they are. The problem is that sex negative feminists will use feminism and objectification as their shield so society isn't going to do that soon.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:00 AM
1

Another aspect that could be implemented is that both genders need to be escorted by a family member of the opposite gender. This would also help keep interactions between the genders acceptable.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:55 AM
6

It would be more effective if lowering child support payments was actually an option. The guy that loses his job is just as likely to end up in jail as the guy that refuses to pay.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:52 AM
8

She can't say that now and she knows it. Everyone is recording and everything will find its way to the media and I think most politician understand that now after what happened to Romney four years ago.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:17 AM
3

Once the low skill high paying invisible jobs (ex. waste management (water/solids), power generation, mining, etc.) start to be automated then the real problems will rear their ugly heads.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 10:58 AM
109

I thought that was painfully clear when the UN Council for Women came out with the #HeForShe bullshit last year.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:03 AM
33

It is punishment for being successful. If the way it was described was actually true than being able to lower child support payments would be just as easy as the mother raising them.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:03 PM
9

Men got the house and kids because they were legally responsible for the welfare of said children. This responsibility wasn't passed onto women with the tender years doctrine to the extent it fell on men and still falls on men.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:47 AM
15

Feminism jumped the shark when they stood by the tender years doctrine stating that women are biologically superior to men at raising children.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:06 AM
1

No anti-GG people are going. A general invite was given out but none of them decided to go.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:18 PM
11

I don't see what's so hard to understand about this. If he is actually found guilty it will be infinitely easier to convict others of harassment for simply disagreeing with feminism. This isn't going to end well for CAFE or any other organization like it if he is convicted.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:16 PM
8

The "Niiice...." standard applies to men while the rape standard applies to women. This allows people to believe that men who are raped by an authority figure actually enjoyed the experience.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:15 AM
9

The perception of doing something decent is more important to people like this than actually doing something decent. When they participate in something like raising funds for advertising this hashtag they can rationalize the rest of their shitty behavior.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:12 AM
2

It is no longer some MRA getting his teeth kicked in over the internet when feminists come after /r/menslib, it is their own teeth. This is what I'm talking about. If /r/menslib sticks around long enough, the male feminists might have their teeth kicked in enough times to figure out that feminism isn't the way to change male gender roles.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 09:37 PM
5

I think it might actually be an enlightening experience for some of the male feminists on Reddit. They can stick their head in the sand when it comes to how feminists treat /r/mensrights but when those same people start attacking them in their own space it changes how people view things. I seriously doubt that male feminists actually know where the MRM came from but this will be a good educational experience for them. I'm pretty sure some new MRAs will be born out of this and a larger amount wil…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 09:22 PM
1

He's just a male power fantasy. /s
/r/MensRights08/08/15 07:30 PM
10

You could say it's Sikh.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 01:10 AM
4

/r/oney does lean more MRA but it tries to keep the anti-feminism rhetoric down to a minimum.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 10:50 AM
8

Feminists will be more polite the day they view societal concerns as anything other than a zero sum venture or the day they realize the empathy gap is real and correct it in themselves as a hole. I don't see either of those events coming in the near future because they are the very foundation on which feminism has been built and it will probably crumble when enough of its believers come to either of those realizations.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 08:39 PM
7

That assault part sounds like a rejected rape fantasy from a romance novel more than an episode of SVU.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:26 AM
2

The reason why it's so far spread now is that women's studies or the equivalent "gender studies" as a degree has become more and more common. This leads to many women being fed feminist dogma in a setting that gives it a guise of validity that it shouldn't get. Which in turn leads to people like Valenti and Sarkeesian being able to push their shit on the wider populous a lot easier. This lets feminism start the indoctrination at an earlier and earlier age so that they can get more students into …
/r/MensRights22/07/15 10:54 PM
3

It depends on how much of a marketing budget Rachel Feinberg has. I'm pretty sure if you throw enough money in front of Oprah, she'll endorse anything
/r/MensRights19/07/15 01:35 PM
34

In this case it isn't chivalry that's the problem. The real problem is misandry.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 11:43 AM
12

The site is actually run by Erin Pizzey so she has an ax to grind with feminists when it comes to domestic violence.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:42 PM
1

I think those examples are a better fit because feminists wouldn't want to do the work to industrialize their genocide.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:53 PM
6

Anyone that likes to say that misandry isn't real because the hate of men isn't institutional point them towards the Duluth Model and the Mandatory Arrest Laws based off of it.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 02:19 PM
5

Her little sister would agree with you.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:09 AM
7

I agree that exact numbers help more than skewed ones but at this point the very narrative of the male always being the aggressor and the female always being the victim needs to be pushed back against first. Once male victims become more accepted then the actual numbers can be put forth.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:28 AM
30

The dirty low class women that feminists don't like to talk about.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:42 AM
4

The dad could write the note then attach the death certificate. I'm pretty sure the people that have to verify this kind of thing would love that happening.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:16 PM
8

It also results in men working fewer hours at less demanding jobs. This is the where the real worry is coming from for some people because the economy at the moment relies heavily on men over working at the more dangerous and demanding jobs.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 06:40 AM
1

Anyone that has done some research into feminism's methods would agree with you.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:48 AM
2

I hope he wins enough to actually harm the school. If this case puts forth precedence to actually harm a schools bottom line I would be happy because schools in the future would be more careful about how they handle sexual assault cases.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:15 PM
5

At least he had custody of his kids so he won't be going back to jail for back child support.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:10 AM
23

He won't really get much time to say anything else because the host and other guests will make sure he's quit and when he does speak he'll be interrupted after the first sentence.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:33 PM
5

This is also how plea deals usually work as well. They charge you with anything even somewhat related to your charge so that you think there is no way that the jury will find you innocent which leads you plea guilty.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:06 AM
13

It's occurrences like these that I use when people want to say that mutilation is inherently different between the genders. What most feminists like to compare are male genital mutilation in the west and female circumcision in Africa and the Middle East. When you shove the cases of male genital mutilation from Africa and the Middle East in their face they generally back track a bit but not all the way.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:20 AM
9

Throughout history everything feminism has accomplished has been through using the lack of empathy society has for men. This is blatantly obvious when looked into because everything feminism puts forward to change society is gendered positively for women and negatively for men. It's interesting once feminism picked up the intersectionality tag that the legislation they pushed through hasn't been gender neutral but remains gendered positively towards women. One would think that at that point all …
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:29 AM
8

Except for the dangerous invisible fields that keep society going. Men get to keep those in a feminist utopia because women aren't allowed to be in danger.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:54 AM
6

It's the modern slave trade. I would guess that the majority of the districts that do this are ones with for profit private correctional facilities. What most people don't understand about those facilities is that the prisoners actually work and produce goods for as little as $1 a day for a full 8 hours of work. These goods are then sold for full price and the profits are sent back to the investors of the companies of the correctional facilities. This is on top of what the state pays these compa…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 12:49 AM
11

Any politician that isn't stupid will not fight NOW on any matter of import and to NOW family law is of the highest import at the moment. NOW loves where family law is because it is a shadowy place that not very many people know about and women come out on top the majority of the time.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:34 PM
12

I wonder if they'll go into how suffragettes sent boys to die in the trenches during WWI.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:28 AM
170

A lot of assholes get complacent since not very many people stick up for themselves, especially if said asshole is a woman. They are truly surprised when they come across someone that seems tame but actually has a spine when push comes to shove.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:19 AM
8

I think it will take schools going out of business at this point for administrators to put safe guards in place for teachers and students that prevent false accusations ruining people's lives.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:18 PM
68

It's not easy to show empathy to a broken machine. Many feminists view men as nothing more than gears within the patriarchy and when one breaks it's a win not a loss of life.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:14 PM
22

Men are always interested in sex and will never turn down a willing partner. This is what feminists believe and will try to convince others to believe.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:31 PM
13

We either have to teach women not to hit or we need to make it permissible for men to defend themselves. If neither of the above options is used the statistic for abused men will be increasing as time passes instead of declining. In the interim the police must believe men when they report that they are abused and let the sexist piece of shit theory of the Duluth model to die like it should have back in the 80's.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:31 AM
3

Until judgments, like the ones at UVA and Duke, by administrators costs the college more than if the administrators did nothing the decisions will always fall this way. I think the affected fraternity should go after UVA with a Title IX complaint as well as going after Rolling Stone.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:08 AM
7

That kind of torture can be classified under slavery though which for profit prisons facilitate a legal loophole for in the US.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:15 AM
3

It seems like you would enjoy /r/menkampf.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:33 PM
17

One of feminism's biggest tactics is to shame people for the decisions that they actually make. Feminists don't like it when people make informed decisions that don't align with the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:47 AM
50

Feminists hide the dehumanizing of men behind the Patriarchy™, rape culture, and toxic masculinity. Most feminists don't even realize what those phrases mean or do in a conversation. The other way feminists rationalize the way that they treat men is through what is known as punching up. Men as a class have higher status than women as a class, so women are allowed to treat men anyway they please.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:34 AM
15

He is defending a woman from a dangerous man of course he feels justified in his actions.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 12:05 AM
8

This is more of an example of /r/menkampf.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 08:05 PM
10

Stories like this make me nervous. If the government isn't willing to buy peace from its own people than I won't feel sorry for bad things that will happen to the government. When large portions of the male population goes hungry and oppressed history has shown that the government in its current form doesn't last long. This is either through a revolution or having to cull a large portion of their male population and then the society can't simply sustain its current course. Men wouldn't necessari…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:19 PM
3

All "victims" get as much "artistic freedom" as is needed to promote the narrative of rape culture.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:32 AM
1

If you watch the first five minutes of this video you will see that her reasoning for abandoning feminism so quickly is pretty sound. She started university in Toronto and actually resisted the peer pressure to become a misandrist and instead likes to label herself as an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:55 PM
3

The first 5 minutes are a pretty good synopsis about her reasons.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:33 PM
8

She interacted with the feminists in Toronto and didn't come out a misandrist. I think that alone speaks highly of her desire for true equality instead of the sham that feminism is trying to push onto society.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:22 AM
2

She is basically doing what feminists are doing for women at this point in time. Taking lived experiences at face value and as fact over anything else. She totally believes this is good research.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:08 AM
12

There is a narrative that needs to be pushed and admitting that the narrative could be wrong is bad for business.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:35 PM
9

Most people don't believe women will lie when it suits them especially something horrendous like this. This is one of the biggest hurdles facing modern society is getting the general public to view women as fully human instead of perfect people.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:32 PM
7

Feminism has lost meaning because of feminism not because of its radicals. When the supposed "radicals" have control of the money, the lobbyists, and the national conscience than those "radicals" are the movement. Until those groups are starved of money and attention feminism will always have no true meaning in today's society.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:39 PM
7

Until schools are ready to protect men from false accusations and make it easier for said men to defend themselves from false accusations this is going to be very difficult to have take place in the current pedophilia/rape hysteria that is gripping the majority of the developed western world.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:27 AM
2

If it was a true crusade against sexual assault that dear colleague letter would have ended college tribunals on criminal matters and had all criminal complaints go to the local PD.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:42 PM
3

This is how some feminists think: if a man penetrates a woman it is rape but the second he no longer finds any woman attractive he's misogynist pig.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:10 PM
17

Visit /r/menkampf, which the apps are based off of, for fun and karma.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 04:38 AM
3

Punishment is so unbalanced that even an accusation leveled at a male teacher gets him fired, arrested, sentenced to years of prison, and registered on the sex offender registry while women could be caught in the act and only have to spend some time on probation.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:33 PM
2

I stopped following TYT during the Fukushima accident when they started in on the fear mongering and the lies about nuclear energy.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:31 PM
8

I have never seen anyone counter the argument that AEI is conservative which it isn't. The counter is always that CHS is a democrat working for a conservative think tank. I think most people get their info from Wikipedia page which states its conservative instead of neutral.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:20 AM
8

Most sex negative feminists are either pretty jealous of their more attractive counterparts or are raging puritans that think they aren't.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:00 AM
-20

All she had to do is get a job at a conservative think tank. Edit: I did some digging into AEI and found out the reason the majority of people think it is a conservative think tank. It is non-partisan, non-political, and gender neutral which we all know is bait for feminists and "progressives" to label it conservative. No one has actually stated in any forums that AEI is actually non-partisan so I always just assumed that everyone else was right. From now on I will refer to it as non-partisan li…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 04:55 PM
3

This is why MGTOW is so hated and people try to shame men from doing it.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:59 PM
2

I hope she doesn't get a trusting therapist as her gatekeeper.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:00 AM
3

I wonder when feminists are going to realize their dogmatic belief in the patriarchy and rape culture make them easy prey for grifters and con artists?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:19 PM
14

Sherri Shepard was actually trying to make the same point as Whoopi but she was getting shouted down on both sides so it got lost. She was stating that if a man hits a woman for any reason he gets arrested even if it's in self defense.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:12 AM
1

Once you are deep enough the rage sets in and you have to tell everyone how history and feminism really are and they look at you funny. After awhile you cool off and are reasonable and don't go out of your way to try and show people what the true history of feminism is and only show the people that want to truly know.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 08:06 PM
3

What's interesting is people have argued against his research time and time again but it always seems true more than it is false. I don't think people would like his research even today.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:34 PM
11

Feminists are defending their narrative that women don't lie about rape and that women are always the victim.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:40 AM
7

Those numbers usually also tend to ignore rape in prison as well.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:38 AM
5

As long as the invisible jobs that keep our society afloat offer a living wage with no degree and keep giving that wage the plight of the male will be mostly over looked. If any jobs dealing with the upkeep of our infrastructure stop giving out that kind of wage society will be supremely shocked when it collapses.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:17 PM
3

I guess I'm too used to viewing the authors of most of those articles as bigots so I forget that most people don't.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:50 AM
14

I didn't expect /r/menkampf to leek into the real world. A lot of the articles are considered low hanging fruit because they are written by real bigots so replacing men with any other group one is born into isn't that hard.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:27 AM
3

I think feminists really need to dump the male as default gender trope now. It's been 30 years since they pushed that into the public conscience and it has had its intended affect. They still push it though just to keep the trope alive.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:44 PM
2

It's not a decade though. It's been thirty years that feminists have been allowed to spew their victim narrative to the public and the government and the majority of people ate it up until more facts have gotten out thanks to the internet.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:42 PM
3

The burqas will be labeled something else and supposedly make the wearer asexual but only women will wear them.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 03:17 PM
14

Next they'll need to get gender studies master and doctoral candidates to follow the women in the gender studies bachelor program with fainting couches. This way they will have a nice place to land when their beliefs are challenged and they faint.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:17 AM
4

She needs to get banished to the place where conspiracy theorists and bigots are sent to in the media. They are allowed to spew their hatred and ignorance around but their audience is only like 100 people.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:21 AM
2

He knew he was going to catch shit for his comments right after the first woman was attacked. It's right in his initial speech but he did his job and put forth a reasonable standard to increase one's safety anyway.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:02 PM
5

With Valenti, Marcotte, and Jezabelle at the fore for the face of feminism I think it has begun to turn. With the true face of feminism finally being seen more and more people are starting to shy away from it. The only problem I see in the future is the academic feminists that have entrenched themselves pretty well. Dislodging them is going to be all but impossible where they are already teaching so I think a new batch of universities are going to need to come up and separate themselves from fem…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:50 PM
4

The thing about Sheever is that she actually wants to add to the Dota2 scene instead of just leeching off of it. You can always tell the women that actually want to contribute to gaming and their respective scenes compared to the girls that want to make a quick buck. The women that want to contribute to their scene stream the game more and actually do positive things instead of just showing some skin.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:40 PM
15

To some feminists gay men are doubly misogynistic because they hate women so much they will only date men.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:16 PM
8

The thing is if they actually held to the other standards of civil court around 80% of the expulsions would be overturned. There is no questioning the accuser, shit half the time the defendant doesn't even know who the accuser is, there is no questioning the witnesses, and there is no putting forth their own evidence at the "trial" for the defendant. If any of those standards were used, like I said, around 80% of the expulsions wouldn't even happen.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:13 PM
81

The majority of people are perfectly comfortable with silencing dissenting views when they are in the majority of a population that believe an opinion.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:14 PM
3

With society's views on male offenders I don't think men's sentences will be getting shorter any time soon. This leaves the justice system only one mechanism to ensure to not be sexist and that is giving women the exact same sentences that a man would receive.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:09 PM
17

I would like to take this time to thank feminists that ensure that this continues. Without your continued support of the female victim narrative all victims might have a shot at actually getting help but that isn't going to happen. Thank you feminists for creating the Duluth Model and primary aggressor laws so that only men are arrested so that you can point to the arrest statistic to continue your campaigns of sexism. I would also like to thank feminists for instating the baddered spouse defens…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:03 PM
3

I do agree it seems like with MtF people that their social interactions are heavily viewed through a feminist lens because that is what society has viewed as the appropriate way for women to interpret social interactions so they notice every little thing that they wouldn't notice otherwise. Instead of interacting with assholes and thinking that person is an ass those interactions become microaggressions against them as women. People do notice me a lot but I have a full body tattoo suit so I stan…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:50 PM
7

At this point in time there is no money in being unbiased in reporting because there is significantly larger amounts of money in biased approaches because advertising agencies have figured out that targeted ads work better than general ones. Since women make the largest percentage of purchases for their household so general consumption items are targeted at them. This leads to news agencies needing to be biased in favor of women so that more women will watch their programming and the advertisers…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:34 PM
4

There are murders because of this though. They are just lumped into the domestic violence death count that men cause women to suffer. Those statistics don't go into why the people were murdered it's always that they were killed.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:20 PM
0

I think women will eventually be just as disposable as men with the current trajectory that fertility science is going. The fertility sciences are trying to make surrogate mothers unnecessary which will in turn make all women unnecessary because children will be able to be born not from women directly but from printed or mechanical uteri.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:17 PM
2

I really think the Supreme Court in the US really needs to say that Twitter is a public space so it's unreasonable to think that you won't hear/read upsetting things on that medium. For whatever reason feminists like to think that Twitter is a private space and people are justified in trying to police what other people are allowed to say.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:55 AM
2

A lot of countries have Good Samaritan laws to protect people that intervene in situations where the person would be severely injured or killed. It's just in the US where it's a state to state standard and one should know their Good Samaritan laws in the state you live in. The problem with them is that it only covers liability and not criminal conduct. If governments would expand the laws to cover criminal accusations that might arise from intervention than people would be more free to give assi…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:29 PM
9

I would have to say the amount available for litigation would have to be above $1 billion for this guy to get involved and it might get as high as $10 billion. A lot of states might be losing more money than they are getting from federal aid if there are multiple cases in different state schools. I'm pretty sure that tuition is just going to go up and will mean less men going to school because they simply don't have the resources to attend like women do.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:59 PM
3

The majority of feminists seem to only police biases that are negative towards women and positive towards men so anything outside of those are left intact at this point. This leaves giant blind spots and double standards that people are getting fed up with and the reason why the mockery of some feminists, especially mainstream pundit feminists, is going way up.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:38 AM
8

I really think it comes from them believing the male as default trope that feminism pushes. This can lead people to believe unless women are being spoken about directly than obviously it is only about men. This needs to change to a gender neutral approach where if no gender is presented than it's talking about humanity instead of just men.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:20 AM
5

It amazes me that feminists can still be shocked by christian institutions pushing a traditionalist agenda.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:32 AM
4

I think you are confused. It only matters when negative generalizations and words affect the oppressed group not the oppressor group. Feminists have no issue with derogatory words being developed or used against the oppressor group.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 12:33 PM
7

Men had to earn their right to vote but women were just given their ability to vote. Just because the national media decided it could make money by exploiting this one subset of violence experienced by males doesn't make it a trend. Women make exactly the same as men when they work the same number of hours in the same job. Boko Haram was going into schools and killing all the boys in those schools while letting the girls go for months before they kidnapped the girls and except for minor stories …
/r/MensRights14/03/15 11:55 AM
23

People and society actually care about the issues women face in life. I'm sorry but that advantage trumps everything else and spawns too many other advantages that women have and disadvantages that men have. Women are much much less likely to face violence in life and yet that's all anyone hears within the media and from politicians. Women don't earn less than men for doing the same work and working the same number of hours and yet all we hear about is how women don't make as much as men. Boko H…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 11:25 AM
5

I just have to wonder why he thought he would be different. From day one when feminists got into domestic violence advocacy they have expunged anyone, male or female, that dared to bring up female perpetrators and male victims no matter how much work they actually did for female domestic violence victims. If they can pull that kind of shit on Erin Pizzey than a mere man wouldn't stand any semblance of a chance of staying within the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 01:10 AM
1

I've listened to Rush before and he isn't a nice man at all. His views on gender and race are as reprehensible as Valenti's. If you want to stick your head in the sand and say he isn't that's fine with me.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:26 PM
1

From what you keep posting I'm going to assume you are getting the institutional and everyday definitions of sexist and racist mixed up. Valenti is just as racist and sexist as Limbaugh is but to you Valenti isn't because she isn't racist or sexist towards the wrong groups.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:05 PM
1

Valenti isn't a troll. She fully believes what she writes and talks about just like Limbaugh fully believes what he writes and talks about.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:33 PM
4

/r/feminism only believes in a few narrow feminist ideologies and if you step outside those they remove you from the discussion because they are only there to talk about those types of feminism and anything else is derailment.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:51 PM
3

I liken her to Rush Limbaugh. Both of them are sexist bigots that are allowed to spew their views to large audiences.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:43 PM
6

This kind of question is used to inflate statistics so that female abuse victims are still the priority.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:34 PM
23

NPR is the most biased news agency when it comes to gender. Everything has to be looked at through a feminist lens when gender is involved. No other viewpoints are allowed anywhere near gender discussions.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 05:54 PM
17

The insane thing is that with rape shield laws prior false accusations don't even make it to court. This makes it exceedingly hard for the accused by women that falsely accuse a lot to not be sent to jail.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:13 PM
6

Here's the interesting issue with your quote though. If trends continue as they are men won't want to interact with women at a personal level on college campuses. It is better to be lonely or dating a woman out of college than it is to risk ones lively hood on a girl in college.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:49 PM
2

Now all they need to do is enact a protective escort law in support of this one. That will drastically reduce the number of female homicides every year. It would have to be 1 man or 5 other women to be a valid escort. The nice thing about this law is that her male SO, father, or brothers could be held as accomplices to her murder since a man is always needed to be blamed when something bad happens to a woman especially if the murderer couldn't be found.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:40 PM
5

Since this is a Muslim accommodation shouldn't they accommodate all Muslim practitioners including men. This would require them to create equivalent hours for men since neither gender are supposed to mingle.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:52 PM
3

You make that a joke but it's not really the dongle jokes and the shirts that are the real issue it's the feminist propagandists that do the most damage. If you lie and say an industry is misogynistic long enough and loud enough people start to believe you.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:01 PM
5

I've termed her the female Rush Limbaugh. Same kind of message but instead of misogyny it's misandry and instead of being racist towards non-whites she's racist towards whites.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:35 PM
3

Archive today is also there in case the feminists get their way and convince publications to remove male positive articles. Yes it can be used to minimize ad revenue to male hostile sites but it is also a good means to keep articles around that the majority find distasteful.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:39 PM
11

SRS really needs to start policing their own before they get up on their high horse about pedophilia.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:45 PM
5

Have you tried /r/feminisms instead? They tend to be less into the single dogma that /r/feminism has so you have at least a better chance (that being above 0%) of it being discussed there.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 08:37 PM
3

Remember no means no for women until it comes to feminism according to feminists. Then that no means you are uneducated or have internalized misogyny.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 06:12 PM
12

It would actually be pretty easy to work on men's issues at the same time as women's. All they would have to do is make every single law they write and lobby for gender neutral.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:50 PM
9

A lot of feminist allies and a lot of feminists themselves make it to the MRM because they were pushed out. Either because they tried to rationally talk about issues and disagreed with feminist dogma or tried to actually care about male issues.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:48 PM
6

There is always /r/menkampf for the fun times that can be had with word swaps.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:18 PM
4

Personally I wouldn't ask her anything and let the feminists in the room hang themselves on their rhetoric.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:21 PM
11

Mary Koss is the feminist that wrote the rape survey that measured unreported rates and the majority of surveys are base on today. She wrote them in such a way that if a woman had one drink with alcohol in it that sexual encounter was considered rape if the victim was a woman. She also wrote her survey in such a manner that males were incapable of being raped and women were incapable of raping anyone.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 06:35 PM
15

Found the Mary P. Koss apologist guys.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 06:15 PM
2

Don't forget the upper class women as well.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 11:38 PM
2

NPR leans Democrat pretty hard but in every other aspect NPR is actually pretty neutral. In every other type of discussion they will allow people of varying ideologies be present but for gender issues they will not allow dissenting views on any topic even when they focus solely on male issues.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:26 PM
8

I'll keep saying it each time NPR is brought up. That place is propaganda for the feminist narrative so if anyone goes looking there for unbiased gender news don't bother. Even when they did their summer on men everything was filtered through the feminist lens.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:15 PM
3

To me misogynist has lost all meaning when it comes from feminists or their apologists. Using it as purely a shaming tactic to silence criticism, especially valid criticism, is starting to wear thin on most people.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:10 AM
7

I think if the MRM can achieve two objectives it will have been a very big success in my opinion. The first is to make people acknowledge and then work on the empathy gap between the issues that men face and the issues that women face. The other is to allow open critique of feminism and feminist ideals within mainstream media, academia, and society at large. If those two objectives can be reached in the next 10 years the damage that feminism has caused in developed western societies can start to…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 09:23 PM
3

The other thing that pisses me off is those that are getting that privilege actively deny they have had a hand in making it that way. Feminists have had a pretty big hand in shaping society for the past 40 years and it hasn't turned out that well for men and the feminists still have the gal to state they are powerless and men have all the power in society.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:03 AM
23

It depends on how the actual training is worded. If everything is worded to reinforce women victim/male aggressor narrative it is very damaging to society and men in particular.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:05 PM
4

If feminists can't control the council and it definitely seems like CAFE is trying to lead the formation and retain control of the council feminists will block it instead. I highly doubt that feminists will put that much effort into this council because if they did they would have to admit men have problems even as the oppressing class in their Patriarchy™. They would rather block it and get it forgotten as fast as possible.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 06:13 PM
6

If only the War of 1812 would have gone in favor of the US.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 11:46 PM
14

I can't really think of any feminist achievement that hasn't either come at the cost of men or through the abuse of gender norms.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:00 AM
11

It's the revisionist arm of feminism that keeps it as some progressive movement that is progressing society from a time of female oppression by the male oppressor. Ever since the feminist lens was introduced to the study of history things have changed for the worse. Feminism is so strong that historians have no choice but to bow to them and their demands of painting the past as a patriarchal caricature that they dreamed up in their heads.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:50 AM
0

It's like she doesn't know what kind of bigotry and hatred each step to "equality" feminism has wrought on our societies. I would point out the very real damage feminism has heaped upon western society once and leave it at that. When you do this be very prepared to lose her as a friend because the text doesn't leave very much room for middle ground.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 03:00 AM
2

Couple more years before they are soldiers? Try tomorrow they will be fighting if they are left alive.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 09:55 PM
9

Another great article about how no means no if you are a woman except when it comes to feminism than no actually means yes only because the woman is uneducated or mislead.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 02:42 PM
4

Any survey that deals with gender from the past 50 years will have had a feminist in the writing team for the survey and telling the people who did the survey how to interpret it. This alone alone is reason enough to be very weary of gender surveys of any kind for the past 50 years. This will not change any time soon so any gender survey that comes out in the next 50 years is also not going to be very impartial.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:49 PM
2

No that can't be right Patriarchy theory fully states that women are abused every day and are afraid of every man she will ever meet so conventional wisdom still stands.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:35 PM
6

He was going to abuse her at some unidentified future time so she had to defend herself.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:33 PM
0

This is AVfM not a feminist publication. I'm pretty sure that a feminist publication would put some PR spin on the re-education camp but AVfM has no need to reword it as anything.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:08 PM
2

The tricky thing about feminism is that it rarely acts on its own but uses internationally recognized states in its stead. With very few instances of carrying out terroristic acts it is very difficult to get all of feminism labeled a terrorist group. The other difficulty of getting labeled a terrorist organization is the fact that their stated means of achieving their goals isn't through terrorism like most terrorist groups state how they operate.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 10:59 PM
1

It can't be both. Once an organization gets recognized as an official state of the world the actions carried out by that state can no longer be classified as terrorism. Terrorism is the action of non-government bodies to try and affect change in a government or society through the generation of fear and hysteria.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 10:23 PM
9

I usually view the reverse gender posts as showing the double standards that feminists like to maintain in society. The biggest of which is as long as the "victims" (because men are never truly victims) are male than it doesn't matter and society should just go about as normal and ignore it.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:00 PM
14

I never understand the hesitancy of feminism to actually try and change women's behavior. The greatest pressure on men is to please their SOs and if feminism would just even attempt to change how women interact with men instead of demanding men to just man up and deal with it would go a long way in easing the societal ills that face men.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:17 PM
8

Don't you understand when a man is raped it is hilarious.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:36 PM
59

Women like her are the reason I have no patience for feminism or most women in general any longer. Out of one side of their mouth they bemoan their own gender role while out of the other they enforce male gender roles with a fervor that is unparalleled by any but the most ardent traditionalist males.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 12:50 PM
10

Here is an old study from around 2004 but I really doubt anything has changed that much from 11 years ago.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 05:15 PM
2

Did Sweden not get the memo that the Duluth Model is complete shit?
/r/MensRights09/02/15 03:32 PM
76

It has been shown time and time again that men simply don't have the same innate in group bias for other men that women have for other women. This is why women seem to always think that men will always look out for each other when that is simply not true.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 03:03 PM
8

This is a great way to kill women's sports stealthily. If men aren't allowed to touch the players for any reason than they won't want to participate as coaches and women simply don't coach enough to fill the gaps. I wonder what facet of girls' activities will be banned or just stop happening next due to the pedophilia hysteria that is sweeping the western world.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 01:15 AM
2

I'm pretty sure that all those girls only programs aren't only for white girls. Feminists should be pressuring to have those funds go to black girls first before they are dispersed to white girls but than again feminism is really only for white middle class women so this isn't going to happen any time soon.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:23 AM
7

There is no real need to spike a drink when the most powerful date rape drug in existence is already in it.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:32 AM
15

They are also taught to listen and believe everything the victim says. If they also listen and believe what that accused says they wouldn't be supporting the victim and no one wants to be seen as unsympathetic to the victim.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:30 PM
1

As long as only men talk about an issue it is a secret to society at large.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:36 AM
1

I guess I'm a misogynist twice over because I think feminism has done more harm than good throughout history and all facts have to be known before I'll believe a woman when she says she was raped.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:20 AM
1

I just wish Reddit had a better system to filter links that use a link shortener and links that don't because the way Reddit is now they are unique links.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:53 AM
5

Men just need to get over their problems so they can get back to their real jobs of helping women and making sure society keeps going.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 04:28 PM
8

We already have a name for that, delusions. Believing what your imagination tells you as real is a known mental illness.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:00 PM
3

They can't interrupt the victim narrative because once they do all the money gets split evenly and they can't have that.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:51 PM
35

I never understood why emotional issues are blamed on men when women use emotional abuse as their primary mode of policing societal norms.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:22 PM
3

It's hard to enforce slavery in a free and open society so family courts need to fade into the shadows.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:50 PM
9

All public figures throughout history have gotten threats but it wasn't until twitter and public Facebook pages that they have become open for everyone to see. She isn't special and she specifically went after 4Chan to get attacked at the start of her career because she knew if this didn't happen than her revenue stream wouldn't have started and she would have gone nowhere.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:26 PM
6

The only way to keep donations at present rates is by putting laws in place where the state won't go after the donors for support. This will not happen because why would the state pay for something when they could simply enslave a man to do it.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:11 PM
1

I think it usually is a lifetime statistic as in 70% of women will be catcalled at least once in their lifetime.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:47 PM
4

Mainstream feminism works through false statistics and hysteria so I would start looking there first. With rape culture being so big now and the continued demonizing of men's sexuality it's no wonder this is going on.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:49 AM
3

The real kicker is there is no necessary invasive procedure at any step of pregnancy or after the child is born. Once the fetus reaches 20 weeks there is enough cells in the mother's blood that they use that to perform genetic screenings now and of course once the child is born a simple cheek swab does the trick.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:34 AM
17

Feminism hasn't been shy about hurting poor people to further their agendas. They target male homeless in the fact they would rather hand wave it away in the face of female homeless. Making fathers and husbands destitute when the wife gets bored and decides to divorce them. Removing good men from their homes and barring them from their residence if their female SO decides they don't want the man living there anymore. All of these are legitimate attacks on poor people by feminism that are still a…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 01:55 AM
6

Personally I think the majority of obstruction to outlawing male genital mutilation is from the cosmetic industry. Several links can be found here describing where it is used and why. It is a huge business to keep the practice of male genital mutilation going.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:36 PM
2

That actually goes against the /r/feminism narrative by quite a large margin. It shows that women can rape men and be a perpetrator of crime, that men can be victims, and that drunk consent can be real consent. Self proclaimed feminists in /r/bannedfeminists have been banned from /r/feminism for lesser breaks from the narrative.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:29 PM
3

When the top post is a link to /r/bannedfeminists in /r/wherearethefeminists than there is definitely something wrong with /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:14 PM
-1

Nope, even things that show support to men's issues, that women can commit violence and aren't always victims, or show that women actually perpetuate the Patriarchy™ just as much as men but are not a question are also removed. That subreddit has a very narrow definition of feminism and what the goals actually are and they like to keep the narrative to that. Any deviation from that narrative will be removed and get the poster banned.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 09:24 PM
7

You are going against /r/feminism's specific narrative around gender identity and the way genders are treated in the Western societies. This is a ban-able offense to them and anything that challenges the narrative is removed and the user that submitted it is banned. No amount of arguing with the mods will get the post reinstated and you will still be banned at the end of all this.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:28 PM
1

Your ignorance of injury types is showing. Fractured bones and slightly pulled muscles/ligaments are very different things.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 06:22 PM
6

Is it really rape if the victim wouldn't suffer any physical or emotional trauma? Without the emotional trauma the act would look no different from consensual rough sex.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:24 PM
1

This has been going on for over four months now of trying to get or keep the authoritarian left out of gaming. The hash tag used is #GamerGate and the subreddit to use is /r/KotakuinAction to discuss this and other forms of authoritarian left maneuvers within the gaming scene.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:49 PM
5

If she actually blamed her mother than she would have to actually believe women have agency. This is directly contradictory to all the feminism propaganda that she has been fed her entire life and would probably destroy her world view and make her question her own validity as a person.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 10:35 PM
3

There is no such thing as http:www .np.reddit it is www .np.reddit so when someone puts the www . in front of np.reddit most browsers don't have a verification on the site so they post that the site is dangerous. Edit: Fixed what is actually broken.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:23 AM
15

The problem is society, guided by feminist propaganda, is going to see this as a woman's need to defend herself from the evil raping men that surround her on mass transit so no matter what name you want to put on it this behavior will be defended and not criticized.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 04:18 PM
2

You really shouldn't since feminists have control of the public discourse plus several key positions in government and education.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:15 AM
4

Usually when children grow up and are removed from the situation and can think on their own they see what really went on especially if the other parent is removed from their presence in the preteen years. This usually leads to massive therapy bills and maybe an attempt or two on their own life if they can't reconnect with the parent that was abused this way.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:08 AM
6

I would say if the MRM actually gets feminism to allow outside criticism and accept it, that would go a long way to help men and boys in society.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:58 PM
10

You have to understand in the current social environment making women responsible for their actions is misogyny. Third wave feminism has done a damn fine job of getting women out of responsibilities for the last 10-20 years and it will only get worse.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:45 PM
7

It's going to be the same thing once Hillary "Women are the True Victims of War" Clinton reaches the presidency.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:56 PM
2

Third wave feminists wave intersectionality in people's faces so they can just not care but appear to care at the same time.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:37 PM
6

Rape is literally worse than murder. Haven't you been paying attention?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:31 PM
17

Maybe if the Republicans stay religiously fundamental and the Democrats continue to push the war on women we can finally get some different parties in the US. I would like to see the Senate and the House split between 4 or 5 parties so that they would actually have to work together instead of trying to vie for super majorities in both like the parties do now.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:46 PM
8

They have to protect their protected class status somehow. The easiest way to do this is to invoke older gender structures that make men want to protect women. What they forget is if they start enacting older gender norms that some men might want all of them and not just the shitty parts.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:06 AM
79

Feminism has had the last 40 years to steer public discourse and the past 30 years of steering the law. I don't understand when feminists claim that they have had no influence on society and women are still oppressed.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:02 PM
9

I've started to call female genital mutilation, female circumcision and just keep calling male genital mutilation as it is. I think if more people sanitized female circumcision we would get more done since it might actually get some feminists to actually think about what they are saying.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 08:28 PM
4

They don't really want to break down the old societal norms completely because if they did that would mean women would actually have to take responsibility for their actions. It's within people's very nature to not want to be held accountable for their actions and feminism is holding to that pretty hard. Look at the current state of sexual relations in college. If a woman has a drunken one night stand with some ugly guy and regrets it in the morning it is now rape instead of a mistake. The only …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:10 PM
15

They can't make harassment and IPV laws gender neutral because that would imply that women can actually perpetrate violence. The biggest and most damaging myth that modern feminism is maintaining and propagating right now is that men can only be perpetrators and never victims and that women are always the victim and never the perpetrator. This myth is a hold over from older societal norms but feminists aren't doing anything about it and are effectively reinforcing it since second wave feminists …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:26 PM
3

Number one date rape drug is alcohol. No need really to spike a drink with another drug when the drink is already spiked. Edit: What this really means is alcohol poisoning for him and being drugged for her.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 08:54 PM
0

I guess throat cancer isn't really that big of deal than. Throat cancer is on the rise due to the increase of oral sex performed by men on women and the prevalence of HPV. At what percentage of the male population getting throat cancer who never chewed tobacco or smoked will the epidemiologists revisit the idea of men getting the vaccine? If it is any more than .1% I would consider them to have woeful ethics and should be fired and barred from participating in any further discussions on the matt…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:26 AM
6

It does directly benefit males though. One of the biggest risks for getting throat cancer is HPV. This is transmitted from the woman to the man during oral sex which directly exposes the throat to HPV. I would suggest if your SO that has HPV demands oral sex before intercourse to either use a dental damn or refuse if you are not vaccinated.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:57 AM
3

His issue probably is that he isn't a wanker. Maybe if he had a few good wanks he would loosen up and not be so bitchy about porn.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:51 PM
6

Go to /r/tumblrinaction and you'll see what he is talking about.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter