TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cknight18 Archive

View 10 posts and 224 comments by cknight18 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Bernie is a selfish coward and I'll never understand the devotion the left gives him. It's all because he was arrested at some civil rights protest in the 60s and got a photo.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 02:02 PM
1

"All genders." Funny way of spelling "both"
/r/MensRights24/07/19 02:44 PM
1

At work, can someone list the details?
/r/MensRights18/02/19 04:23 PM
1

Except....humans dont walk around with giant banners that say "I'm dangerous!" I'm not saying disregard all lived experience. If you see someone who looks/acts sketchy, it would be foolish not to at the very least be cautious of them. That said, what it sounds like you're advocating for is using numbers (rates of women abusing children) to say "no women should be trusted with children." That is exactly the kind of mentality we're supposed to be fighting against (#notallmen). We cannot let oursel…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 01:21 PM
5

And I believe, that whatever the numbers say, we shouldn't generalize which group commits X crime more. Treat people as individuals.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:49 AM
1

I was attempting to make a comparison.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:23 AM
1

I'm not arguing with that (and not really trying to argue at all), I'm just trying to caution you. The tone of the post, at least to me, says "it's really women who we shouldn't trust with kids, not men!" I'm sure that's not the message you meant to convey, but that's how it'll come across to newer viewers not familiar with the sub.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 08:41 PM
-2

I strongly caution using generalizations here. I agree that society should be more comfortable with men around children. Hell I'm a guy and I love rough-and-tumble play with my nieces/nephews. But saying "women are more likely to abuse children, therefore we should trust men more than women!!" is playing their exact game. Concrete rates of domestic violence are hard to come by, for a number of reasons. But most I've seen put it at 60/40 split, women/men as victims. But just because more women ar…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 08:35 PM
3

Kavanaugh came up yesterday when I was talking to my mom, and she said "know you, I've been thinking a lot about that men's rights stuff, and I think I agree with you. I'm coming to see that you're completely right." Short backstory. My mom has always been level headed. I asked if she'd like to Watch the Red Pill doc. This was like a year and a half ago. The film had been one of the best ways I've found can be most convincing that yes, men do have legit concerns and no, it's not as simple as "bu…
/r/MensRights15/10/18 10:35 PM
3

This is honestly one of my biggest issues with feminism. Everyone knows rape and sexual assault are bad. No rapist thinks to him/her self "hmm, I was going to rape somebody today, but I saw a sign that said don't rape so I guess it's bad." Sure, some issues have relevance: teach people about boundaries. Teach people that even when you're in a romantic relationship with someone, that does not entitle you to their bodies. But what I don't get is why the message had to be gendered. Gendering it enf…
/r/MensRights14/10/18 09:37 PM
7

I got sucked into an argument on FB about the whole Kavanaugh thing, and the "teach men not to rape" argument was brought up. I pointed out it's just as sexist as "teaching black people not to steal." Basically got called a horrid person for even suggesting that....pretty sure he missed my point.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 09:29 PM
4

This is what postmodernism does. It creates an oppressed vs oppressor mentality
/r/MensRights13/10/18 01:39 AM
2

Just playing devil's advocate here, you could very well argue that him getting elected despite that controversy is acceptance for what he did, thus perpetuating rape culture. Like I said I dont subscribe to the theory, but I guess I'm not sure what to respond with when its brought up.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:36 PM
3

Honestly while I dont agree with the last guy (I see the CMM series as a pretty good way to start dialogue), I think his head is in the right spot. While a ton of people just want to remain in their own echo chamber and drown out any opposing views, at least he seems to want discussion.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 03:02 PM
2

Yeah both sides suck but that's what happens with a 2-party system.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 03:00 PM
1

So I'm totally on the side of Crowder here, but I'm curious what his defense would be if Trump was brought up. He kinda did admit to sexually assaulting women. Honestly that seems to be the best pro-rape culture argument. Thoughts?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:36 PM
6

Not only that, but she wasn't even asked about the incident specifics (Kavenaugh wasn't even mentioned) under her polygraph.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:29 PM
20

Chills down my fuckin' spine, man. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:51 PM
3

I got a serious kick out of their description of Jordan Peterson. No matter how many times he explains his views, he'll be labeled alt-right until the end of time.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:45 AM
9

No proof....except for the many emails she sent him, detailing how much she wanted to kiss him.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:34 PM
6

A lot of people on here have just had bad experiences with feminists (mostly women), and sometimes it comes out as a negative stereotype on women. We should police ourselves on it and call each other out, but that doesn't mean the whole purpose of the subreddit is to "shit talk women."
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:45 PM
9

If a woman reads a PSA "hey, watch your drink to make sure it doesnt get spiked," what's wrong with that? The list in the OP is basically telling women advice on how not to get raped, and for men how not to rape. Now let's say there's a woman who legitimately doesn't think men can be raped (which honestly isn't as rare an idea as you might think). She basically thinks she can do whatever she wants and it be OK, because she's been taught: (1) men always, always want sex with anyone they can get w…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 06:37 PM
23

Why not just gender-neutrally give solid advice to both? Makes no sense to give different advice to different genders. It tells women "you are the default victim", and to men "you are the default perpetrator."
/r/MensRights08/08/18 06:05 PM
10

If we truly believe people should be treated equally, regardless of sex, then we should still be calling out sexism against women when we see it.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:06 PM
1

Like?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:37 PM
1

Just curious, what rapists am I or this sub supporting?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:06 PM
1

You seem to have quite the pent up anger. I'd get that checked out.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:54 PM
5

(1) Most here aren't interested in playing victim olympics, sorry I misspoke. I do empathize with those who would "put men at the top of the victim ladder," so to speak. There's only so many times you can be told to STFU about your problems before you break. I'm sure I'll get some "ha! it's way more than a select few, it's almost all you shitheads!" response; think about how confirmation bias might be influencing how you perceive this sub. (2) Seriously not sure why race is always brought up in …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:23 AM
8

So when discussing whether or not misandry exists, the first thing you bring up is misogyny? In case you didn't know, this sub isn't interested in playing victim olympics. Deciding whether or not men or women have it worse off isn't really productive (there's not really a good quantifiable way to compare anecdotal experiences people of different groups have), and it just plain doesn't interest me. What does matter to me, and what matters to most people on this sub, is that when women experience …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:50 AM
5

Point out where I said misogyny doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:14 AM
9

Agreed entirely. And honestly, who the fuck is going to turn down a bj from their SO?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:23 AM
14

Proof? EDIT: The burden of proof isn't on feminists to prove it doesn't exist, the burden of proof is on others to prove it does. So here we have a woman who has repeatedly and unapologeticlly bashed men for nothing less than being men. Shes still retains her editor status in one of the largest publications in the world, and nobody bats an eye. This case is only one example, but it's one of many.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:16 AM
2

Were the girls sold into slavery though? From what I had heard, and correct me if I'm wrong, is that the girls would likely be given as child brides, instead of receiving an education from the school they were abducted from. Still a horrible fate, but not nearly as bad as being sold as a sex slave.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:50 PM
1

I think it's something we should keep our eye closely on. We can't let them slip changes in to turn it into something it's not. That said, I don't believe fear of change should keep girls from joining. If a girl wants to do cool shit on the woods, they should be able to.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:41 AM
2

From what I've heard, it's the leadership that want it to remain a money-making scheme. They apparently make a bit of money getting little girls to sell cookies.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:36 AM
1

I'm gonna be honest, I don't give a fuck about whether feminists wanted this or not, young girls should have the opportunity (or a wider one than they had) to enjoy the outdoors. I agree that boys/men should have their own space. But from what I've heard, and correct me if I'm wrong, is that the groups won't be co-ed. There will be separate scouting groups for boys and girls. So a group of boys get to go camping and learn some cool stuff about the outdoors. Oh now there's a group of girls doing …
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:35 AM
3

Not co-ed? If that's the case I really don't see what the issue is. Boys will still have their own separate space, the only difference is that now they're will be a group of girls doing similar things in a different location, but under the same name. Am I missing something? As long as it doesn't go further (like dropping activities that are "too masculine"), what's the downside? As a lover of the outdoors, I'm excited about anyone, boy or girl, getting into the hobby.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:55 PM
3

I'm torn on the issue. I really do believe that boys/men should have their own spaces separate from women/girls, but let's be honest who here doesn't know that the girl scouts suck? I dont blame girls for wanting to join a more outdoorsy club than girlscouts provides. I think ideally there would be gendered scouting groups that offered a better variety of activities. Just my 2 cents.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:48 PM
4

The also paint the discussion wrong. Whether you're pro-choice or pro-life, the debate does not come down to "is it a women's right to choose, or not?" It comes down to "is the fetus a human being with inherent rights, or not."
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:26 PM
2

What's sad is that one of the biggest indicators that a man (or woman) will be violent is the lack of a father in the household. What has feminism done about this? Done everything it can to dismantle the "oppressive" nuclear family.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:18 PM
87

How the fuck are women not up in arms about this? Everyone freaks the hell out when James Damore puts out a private memo that should have only been seen by his company. He states why he thinks diversity initiatives are failing, and puts forth scientific evidence for why men and women tend to go into different fields. But then when a school lowers the standard for women, nobody makes a peep? Da fuck?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 12:47 AM
4

Amen to that. We don't need to flood the sub with every instance of women acting like children. It's one thing if a prominent feminist is spoutting off this BS, but random women who doesn't even mention "in the name of feminisn"? Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 02:41 PM
3

They didn't even answer the question. I didn't ask "why do men commit far more suicide," I asked "why does society (and even this panel) not want to talk about these issues." As soon as they had answered my question, I had my hand raised to ask another. I was going to point out that when men do ask for help, like with domestic violence for instance, they are more likely to be arrested themselves than helped. Unfortunately they only left 30 minutes for audience questions, and I only got to ask th…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 01:10 PM
3

Haha that is definitely true. Arguing (debating?) with others can almost be like a wetstone. Though I doubt I'll ever change anybody's mind.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:28 AM
4

I just want to do something. Getting into facebook arguments with my sister is great and all, but at the end of the day it accomplishes very little.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:04 AM
2

Just seems like such an inconvenience just for the sake of a few people being uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:57 PM
11

I go to a pretty small school, and while we are left-leaning I don't think it'd be an issue. But if it did turn out to be one, it just paints the other side as the emotional, logic-lacking children they are.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:53 PM
10

Or making all the black kids promise they won't join gangs (or any other negative stereotype that falls on black people). Any other group is protected from stereotypes except men.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 11:53 PM
11

I've been so fascinated with the whole thing since Damore was fired. Not to go too far into politics, but what you have in this case is more left-leaning group of people denying the science behind biological sex differences. The same people would likely mock right-leaning people for denying climate change. But as soon as science doesn't agree with their agenda, it's wrong. What's more interesting is where the burden of proof lies. With climate change, it lies with proving it does exist, not that…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 04:16 PM
1

You said there needs to be an objective way to measure it, but then go on to say men and women are both genuine and inspiring in different ways. That's literally a subjective perspective. There would have to be, but like I said I don't really have any interest in measuring it. Even if we could measure it, which I don't see how you'd do it, I don't really see the point. If I could provide an example from experience though, I've noticed men are generally more honest, have more integrity, and even …
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:15 AM
-3

I don't know what the ratio is, I doubt there's any data on it. You'd have to have some objective way to measure it. I'm sure that since men and women differ in their personalities, there might be some ways men generally are more "genuine and inspiring," and some ways women tend to be. Do I care? Not really. You may deny it, but I think your initial comment comes from resentment of women. It's not incredibly uncommon on this sub; I think it's an understandable consequence of a lot of the shitty …
/r/MensRights25/02/18 12:22 AM
16

Implication that most of the genuine and inspiring people out there are men, not women? I have to ask, how is this constructive in any way?
/r/MensRights24/02/18 08:01 PM
5

Ha! I'm totally stealing that
/r/MensRights23/02/18 10:32 PM
2

Don't women also show some different signs for a heart attack? Maybe I'm thinking stroke. Either way, this poster in no way detracts from men....
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:26 PM
10

I do see the difficulty, though, in that the equality of opportunity is damn hard to measure accurately. I think this issue in particular, we have to try to be as understanding as we can about where the other side is coming from (even if their side is denying science). When we say that some character traits have a biological basis that tends to differ between genders, I can see why feminists would think "they just want us back in the kitchen!" Whenever this issue comes up, I think it's very impo…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:11 PM
14

I just find it hysterical that the loudest women who are upset over non-equal outcomes are always the ones who studied gender studies in college. You ask them why they chose their major, and they'll never admit they were conditioned by society. They truly knew what they want to do and followed their heart. It's the women who teach or become nurses or (gasp!) stay at home moms that didn't really have a choice in the matter.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 01:26 PM
1

Ah, MRM linked to this sub's comments. Glad to see that sub isn't promoting pieces of shit and there ideas.
/r/MGTOW11/01/18 11:42 PM
-1

Is this really the type of ideology that we want to promote? I completely agree that men and women tend to be different, and those differences may include traits that make men better at leadership positions. But that's an average, not to be a label put on all women, no? Is it any different to say "male stay-at-home parents are more worthless then male psychologists"? Let's not compartmentalize everyone based on gender, whether it be how well a woman can lead a company or how well a man can raise…
/r/MGTOW11/01/18 04:57 PM
4

That's actually the very example I gave to try to disprove her point.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 01:50 PM
20

Another one from the same thread, different poster: If you can name even one woman you know of who exhibits any of these traits, the biology argument is debunked. It cannot possibly be biological because I know many women with these traits and many men without these traits. EDIT: I seriously wish I was making this up. Kind of hard to debunk someone's ideology when they aren't in touch with reality.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 05:22 AM
41

I spotted a discussion on biological differences between the sexes, something that has had me really interested lately. Guy was saying that maybe, just maybe there are biological differences when it comes to the interests men and women have. Gave a big list of sources. This is what the feminist responded with (I can't make this up): Just because we can do something, doesn't mean we should. I don't think we should be creating any theories on this. Any theories created in a sexist society will be …
/r/MensRights02/01/18 02:53 AM
4

What type of learner are you? A little off topic and at the risk of getting massively downvoted: there's actually no scientific evidence for "learning styles" (i.e, visual vs auditory vs kinesthetic). The only evidence people can seem to bring up is anecdotal, "well I know I'm a visual learner because I didn't understand a topic until I saw it presented visually..." Not saying that boys and girls in school are exactly the same, boys tend to have a harder time with the "sit still for 8 hours and …
/r/MensRights01/01/18 07:28 PM
13

The mental gymnastics some people go through just astounds me sometimes. It's like, how can you not see the logical inconsistencies here? Reminds me of another discussion I had with someone about DV. Showed them one of those social experiment videos, the ones where they have a man beating up a woman and everyone freaks out (as they should, nobody should get beaten up in public), but then people laugh at the man getting hit by the woman. She (girl I was having the discussion with) was totally OK …
/r/MensRights24/12/17 04:48 AM
25

I've just always found it fascinating that when talking about gender differences, women are allowed to have strengths and men are allowed to have weaknesses, but not vice versa. After that Google memo came out, I got into a heated discussion with my sister about how men and women are different, and how some of those differences are biological in basis. She didn't like the references that James Damore provided in his memo, so I got more. Basically what it came down to for her, is that "I need to …
/r/MensRights24/12/17 03:54 AM
1

Is our aim to silence opposing beliefs?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 03:00 AM
4

Feminism hate =/= woman hate. One could argue that feminism is even worse for women than it is for men.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:46 AM
3

"The sentencing system should be reformed radically to deal more fairly with female offending." And we do that by giving men and women the same sentences, not intentionally giving women even more lenient ones. Twice as likely to face prison time and receive 60% longer sentencing isn't enough, I suppose.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:25 AM
0

RemindMe! 3 Months
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:30 AM
3

Haha hard to have anything to compare it to, when anything posted in r/feminism that doesn't agree with their dogma gets removed and the poster banned.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:10 PM
7

Great video! Thanks for posting!
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:06 PM
5

Did....did you just call me a feminist just because I point out something that I see as anti-women when I see it? That makes 0 sense. Am I part of BLM if I tell my buddy not to call some random guy on the street a "nigger"? I get it, there's sometimes a general level of contempt for women on this sub. I try to ignore it most of the time because, well, I feel like a lot of it has come out of a bad experience the poster had with feminism or with a woman in general. But I think a lot of posters on …
/r/MensRights07/11/17 12:07 AM
4

It's not that I don't think you explained your point fully or clearly, I just think it actually boarders on gasp misogyny.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:18 PM
8

Yeah I'm not gonna lie when you start talking about how women are too incompetent to follow through with shootings is where you lost me. This is the type of post that gives the sub a bad rep.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:07 PM
1

Maybe I'm wrong but I think most people on this sub would agree that if you get so drunk that you make a decision you wouldn't normally make (i.e, have sex), then you are responsible for that decision. The other person is not responsible for your actions. Passed out drunk is another scenario and then it would be rape. If person A (sober) walks up to person B (drunk) and asks them to have sex and person B consents, it's not the responsibility of person A to make sure person B can make good decisi…
/r/MensRights05/11/17 11:53 PM
2

Most of the conversations I've seen circulating around with this 'Me too' thing end up with it just being about blaming men, teach boys not to rape, etc. And I'm like, so we can have a conversation about a problem women face, sure, but it stops being about women when you're calling on men to take the blame.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:05 PM
5

When you really think about it, the ad really accomplishes the exact opposite thing is wants to. It says that (1) violence against women is wrong, never hit a girl and that (2) violence against women is something that is generally accepted in society. Um, if it was accepted by society why did these boys say "I won't hit her because she's a girl"? Honestly when was the last time someone said it wasn't wrong to hit a girl? EDIT: a word
/r/MensRights07/01/15 12:40 AM
3

And what most pro-lifers would say, is that the fetus is the same as a child. So aborting a fetus because they might have hardship later in life is the same as killing an abused 4 year old.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:14 AM
2

:)
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:29 AM
6

It's honestly really hard for me to tell, because I know there aren't huge gender disparities in domestic violence and sexual assault. From observing all the men around me, I think they take it as fact and don't question it much. I've had some discussions about things like the DV double standard society has (one of those videos with the actors on the street playing out female-on-male DV and vise versa sparked discussion), but in all honesty I think most people don't question what they hear when …
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:06 AM
12

Also in the Navy but haven't seen this particular training. But trust me, it's everywhere. I remember when I was in tech school, we were in a classroom and we talking about DV, sexual assault, etc. We were all told to close our eyes and envision 5 women in our lives (by then I knew exactly what was coming). We were then told to picture them beaten, raped, or hurt and how angry we'd feel. Then told us "don't be that guy because she will be someone else's wife/sister/daughter." I asked, in front o…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:32 PM
2

Well the movement is to bring back equality in areas where men are disadvantaged. I would probably guess most here would say it's (mostly) about tipping the scales back to equality. And I fully agree with Froolow, your argument is a bit weak for reasons he explained. Just because I believe the way we handle rape alligations should change, and that change might negatively affect some women who would falsely report, doesn't mean the MRM is against women.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 05:15 AM
17

I want this caster to walk up to my 5 year old nephew, and tell him that it would be better for something bad to happen to him than to his 5 year old, girl, cousin. Because he's a boy
/r/MensRights09/10/14 04:56 AM
1

What type of standard should we be holding, for both men and women? This is a question I can honestly not answer for myself. Should we say that, 100% of the time, if you drink too much and find out that you slept with someone, you should just be a more responsible drinker next time? Or should we say that, 100% of the time, you should not sleep with someone who has had too much to drink? What if both parties are equally drunk? What if someone slips something into the other party's drink? I feel l…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:28 PM
1

That just goes back to nature vs nurture, which both have something to do with it. But if it is instinct, it's a lot harder to rid ourselves of it.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:28 PM
2

Yeah...maybe brining religion into this isn't the best idea for unifying the movement. I get that it's just a comparison of how to approach a group of people who think differently. But let's be honest here you were bacisically calling all creationists a bunch of batshit crazy crybabies and all atheists are perfectly rational, opressed people.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 08:21 AM
2

Meh, some people will always be like that. Basically what his comment was, is that "I can't be upset about something I think is wrong because I'm not getting shot at." Or, you could say he's calling me privileged. Personally, yeah I realize that my situation is not literally the worst thing ever to happen, but I still have the right to feel frustrated that male victims are being shunted into a corner because it's a problem the military/governemt doesn't know how to deal with/ignores. Anyway, peo…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:03 PM
1

I can honestly say that writing these was both very fun, and very easy (none of them hold any weight when you actually take a closer look at them/reverse them). Good to see people still reading these old posts and enjoying the humorously horrid logic as I did :)
/r/MensRights06/04/13 02:22 AM
5

What people need to understand is, women do sometimes lie about rape. I don't like to get into percentages because those kinds of things are incredibly hard to pin down, but I just say that it happens enough for it to be considered a really big problem. Some people try to argue that women don't rape or that it's so rare, or say something like"why would a woman lie about something like that? What do they have to gain?" Well, guess what caused the vast majority of lynchings in the early 20th centu…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:28 PM
6

And that's assuming that giving out free birth control will completely solve the problem of unwanted teen pregnancy, which it won't. No kids who are about to have sex think "we shouldn't use condemns, they're too damn expensive." Birth control is pretty damn cheap already, and if they're not using it now, I highly doubt that the teen birth rates will decrease that much if it becomes free. So do I think it should be free? I don't know, maybe. But (1) I don't think that it will even be close to en…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:00 AM
21

People just don't seem to understand. Like OP said, I don't go into bad neighborhoods late at night as a precaution. Or how about this. If I go to the heart of NYC in a bad neighborhood, and I leave my brand new $15k bike just sitting on the sidewalk and leave it there for an hour, someone is going to steal it. Everyone knows stealing is bad, it's not like that isn't drilled into us from every direction when we're young. But guess what. There have always been thieves, and there always will be. S…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:18 PM
4

I still wouldn't say that the sign should be taken down. "Men" is a somewhat generic term, just as "mankind" refers to all humans (women included). If the sign said "males working," that would be a little more of an issue but again, I don't think it would be something to fret about.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:15 PM
1

You started an anti religion circlejerk, and I asked you not to, because that's not the point of this subreddut. You said that you had not tried to start one. I pointed out the obvious, that saying that religious people inhibit critical thinking was blatantly trying to rag on the religious. You then replied with "I said that both feminism and religion inhibit critical thinking." So I figured I'd break it down, so it would be really easy for you to understand. Pointing out obvious facts because y…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:13 AM
0

Including something else in the train of thought that actually has something to do with this subreddit doesn't make it any less of an anti religion circlejerk. I come to r/mensrights because I want to hear about the things going on in the movement. And you could say that, in a sense, this whole subreddit is an anti-feminism circlejerk. But if I wanted to hear about how stupid, close-minded or, as you put it, "inhibiting of critical thinking" religious people are, I'd go to r/atheism. What if I w…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 07:21 AM
1

Well when you say things like "religion inhibits critical thinking," you'll understand why I take that as leading to a circlejerk
/r/MensRights17/11/12 01:05 AM
3

Could we not start an anti religion circlejerk?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:34 PM
21

Not only that, but feminists say that feminism is for men, too, but then they play the "all men are wife-batterers" card. They say that strong women have a reason to be afraid of men, and at the same time they try to convince the people they're painting as monsters that feminism is for their good.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 11:07 PM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 09:42 PM
1

I gave up on the dictionary definition when I read the last line, "especially as it applies to women."
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:28 AM
1

Ok I see what you're saying. You're not saying it's sexist against girls for saying "girls like flowers," you're saying it's sexist against boys because "boys can't like flowers." Well I understand that this is not a good view to have, but I would still not call it sexism myself, I would call it a stereotype. But that all stems off of a different idea of what makes something technically "sexist."
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:46 PM
1

I'm still not understanding how a company putting flowers on a tissue box is sexist.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:35 PM
2

How so?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:30 PM
0

I am not saying that only girls can like pink or flowers or whatever. I am saying that there is nothing wrong/sexist with the statement "girls tend to like flowers/pink more than boys do." It is not sexism, it is not even stereotyping. It is a generalization. It would be stereotyping if I said "all girls like pink/flowers more than all boys."
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:29 PM
1

But what I'm saying is that it is neither sexism nor harmful. I hardly see the statement "women tend to like flowers more than men do" discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:24 PM
1

I don't see how expecting that a woman will probably like flowers as a gift is harmful at all. Because in general, they do.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:02 PM
1

But, assuming you're using the same definition of sexism that I laid out, how are either of these cases sexist? Why is giving and receiving different kinds of gifts sexism? And even though I've grown up and no longer tell women-in-the-kitchen jokes, they are inherently not the sexist jokes as they are labeled. They're still bad because they are stereotyping, but I can't see why someone would call them sexist. Unless there is inherently something worse you are associating with a gender (like sayi…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:40 PM
3

And women give things to men that men don't typically give to women. Does this mean that if I do in fact fall into the generalization and I give my SO flowers and she gives me, say, bullets for the shooting range (bad example, I know), does this mean that we're both sexist?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:30 PM
6

If I don't get flowers, is that sexism?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:05 PM
-2

Can you explain how it's sexist? Sexism is the belief that one gender is in some way better than the other. I wouldn't call this a "sexist" view at all. At most it's gender stereotyping (and even then I think it fits more into the category of a generalization than a stereotype), which you can definitely argue is bad, but it is certainly not "sexist." EDIT: If you downvote me, tell me why I'm wrong. Tell me what's wrong with my definition of sexism, or how from that point my logic is flawed. I lo…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:42 PM
6

Yes....The facts always matter.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:58 PM
0

^ What he said ^
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:26 PM
1

I can understand why society feels like men only want sex and that we think with our dicks, because in part it's what is written into our DNA. Now before you bring in the downvote brigade, hear me out. All I'm saying is that way back when when humans were first evolving (and probably before we were even humans), if men weren't trying to have sex and produce offspring as much as they could, then well there wouldn't have been nearly as many of us. Why was it the men who would have sex at the top o…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:18 PM
1

I think it's this video on benevolent sexism, but I could be wrong. It's not a major topic she goes into, just like a 2 minute part she talks about it. And because most of her videos are 20 minutes long at least, you can understand if it's the wrong video.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:57 PM
17

I'd have to look more into it, but in one of GWW's videos she mentions something about other countries (like in the Middle East) and how men are just as oppressed as the women are. Not saying that feminism women's rights movements there are therefore not needed, but they need men's rights movements too. Again, I'd have to read more into it to really find out more but GWW usually does her homework.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 10:54 PM
3

I'm glad that this woman had the balls to step in someone else's shoes (haha). But when I read the last line of the first paragraph (about her being glad she was a female), I kinda had wore an "OOOOK?" face. I know that men have a lot of issues in today's society, and I know there are a lot of places (like courts) where being a woman is a clear advantage, but I don't think we need to be comparing how difficult the lives of different genders are. Lets just stick to solving the issues we have, and…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:34 PM
6

As someone who is pro-life (really don't want to get into it again right now), thanks for pointing that out. The word "pro-choice" really doesn't get to the heart of the issue (neither, really, does pro-life if you think about it). It's frustrating that society sees the view of pro-life as "anti women's rights" when it's not like we just want to oppress women, we just have a different view of when someone becomes human.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:22 PM
17

Although I'll be buried, I'm just going to go ahead and refute all of those. "1. My odds of being hired for a job, when competing against female applicants, are probably skewed in my favor. The more prestigious the job, the larger the odds are skewed." Source? I find this really hard to believe, especially with affirmative action. "2. If I fail in my job or career, I can feel sure this won’t be seen as a black mark against my entire sex’s capabilities." Ok? Even if this was true, the same can be…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:34 AM
3

Did you, you know, read the rest of the quote?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:00 AM
5

Can you explain to me and the rest of us here why a man working longer hours, at a higher risk of death/injury should get the same amount as a woman working fewer hours at a safer job?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 06:55 AM
8

If women want to do things like bake or clean or throw cool parties with all kinds of neat decorations, why should feminists care? It seems to me that feminism has been placing more barriers of what is "acceptable" for women to do than they're taken down. You're only allowed to do something if it's not traditionally womanly. And that's really what upsets me most about feminism. It shames women for doing what they want to do, if what they want to do falls into the category of traditional female r…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:43 PM
2

Why on earth would you hope for SRS to use your comment to further demonize MRM? It's a stupid thing to say and they'ed be right to call you out on it.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:57 PM
0

TIL India is a continent
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:48 PM
4

the weak children known as women. SRS is gonna have a good ol' laugh with that.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:32 PM
2

I definitely agree that at the very least the whole child support system needs a huge overhaul. Women are taking advantage of the system and abusing it to get money that never makes it to the child. So you disagree with abortion even if done in the very early stages of pregnancy? In my mind, if it's after conception it's too late to turn back. But I don't feel like LPS is totally out of the question just because I'm against abortion, I just think it makes the concept a little more...foggy?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:05 PM
2

I don't know, GWW's arguments make perfect sense, but I feel like she's oversimplifying the matter. Part of the reason I feel this way is because when she's refuting the idea that child support is in the best interests of the child she basically says "but we do so many things that aren't in the best interests of the child anyways." I just feel like at least there, just because some things might not be in the best interests of the child doesn't mean it's ok for other things that we can control no…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 01:41 PM
3

I agree. I think she has so much good stuff to say. I'm still not sure where I stand on things like legal paternal surrender though.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 01:46 AM
2

Whoa, I'm actually not alone haha. It can get a little daunting sometimes on reddit when you hold beliefs as unpopular as this.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:15 AM
2

I know that it is not such an easy thing to come to a decision about. A lot of it is just how we define things like "human" and "person." Personally, I believe the moment of conception is when life begins. "Life" meaning not only when cells start dividing, but also when it wrong to kill it.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:56 AM
6

Do I think that SS should be abolished entirely? I don't know. I think that it sucks that people who don't want to fight have to, but when it comes down to it we all have a duty to defend the country that's given so much to us. Do I think women should have to be a part of it too? Probably, but their service should come in a different form than fighting in combat. Just my take on it.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:47 AM
2

Nobody is denying the fact it's wrong for an abortion to take place moments before a child is born. What I am saying is that saying just because the fetus is smaller or is just "a clump of cells" is not enough to say that it doesn't have the right to live. Is a full grown man more of a person than a baby, just because the man is bigger? Size has nothing to do with humanness.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:42 AM
0

Just because it's separate doesn't mean it's not as important, and in this case I think it more important.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:12 PM
1

And you're just a bigger group of cells.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:02 AM
0

Man doesn't want baby, woman doesn't want baby: Abortion, happy couple! Dead child!
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:29 AM
0

Now all they need to do is put the same message on birth control pills. Before you know it, these signs will appear in pamphlets for vasectomies and for women getting their tubes tied. O wait, only women have to give consent.... Edit: Ok just for clarification I was not saying that this message was ok, even if it was on birth control pill bottles too.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:46 PM
8

When are they going to let men off the child support hook when they legitimately cannot afford it? FFS this makes me sad
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:46 AM
10

And even if Midnightblues' scenario was the case, it doesn't make it any better. Child support is not given so you can spend money on yourself.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:38 PM
9

I think that's what Idiopathic77 was calling for, if I'm reading him correctly. He's saying that the registry should not be abolished completely, but that there should be, as he put it, "reasonable distinction as to who goes on that list" so only things like rape are put on the list. Personally, I don't know how I feel about it. I KNOW that public urination and such should not be on it, let alone open to the public, but I'm not sure if a rapist's name should be put up for anyone to see. I can un…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:15 PM
12

Now I remember why I always liked Cartoon Network most outta the main 3 (other 2 being Nick and Disney channel).
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:59 AM
8

The thing that I don't get is why feminists get so upset about it, because isn't it more referring to prison rape? Not that prison rape is less of an issue, but it seems to be at least for feminists. If it was, you'd think we would hear more from them about stopping it. But of course, that is assuming feminism is about equality for everyone and not just "more" equality for women...
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:32 AM
1

Hahaha upvote for the comic relief in his second comment. Damn she fine
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:56 PM
1

Do you actually need me to answer that?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:54 PM
2

That's rough bro. I don't wanna know some of this stuff because it's kinda depressing, but we need to know.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:59 AM
53

Wait, so your ex slashed your tires? Haha what did you do to deserve that? /sarcasm
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:06 AM
6

Exactly! And not only are we telling boys in school that they're stupider, but we're pressing down on them the idea that they're inherently just worse behaved. Young boys have higher metabolisms than girls do and it's hard for them to sit still for hours on end, something our society has deemed is necessary. To top it all off, there are vastly more female teachers in early childhood through elementary schools, so boys have fewer role models to look up to.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:14 PM
14

Why can't they just believe that maybe, just maybe, women are doing better in schools because for the last few decades we've been telling boys that they're stupider?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:24 PM
0

Yes. But there seems to be a pervasive belief that men actually aren't under any harm when a woman starts to attack them. I never said that nor do I believe that. To further suggest that the man shouldn't use violence in his defence is promoting the argument that all force used against women is wrong. I understand what you're saying. The fact is that if a man is in danger of being hurt by a woman, and if he defends himself with necessary force, society will eat him alive. But I still believe, th…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 04:24 AM
1

You try to put limits on what can or cannot be done during self-defence But we all will put limits on it somewhere. Surely you wouldn't say that if someone was hitting you (without threat of serious harm) that you should pull out a gun and shoot them? If not, then that's putting a limit on what we can do in self defense. I don't know why I have to say this so many times, but everything I have been saying stems from the idea of using minimal force. When sitting at home and your spouse slaps you a…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:44 AM
1

Most people don't have the skill to restrain someone properly and you would be surprised how difficult it is to restrain even someone small So that means we shouldn't try? That means that at the first sign of danger we should throw any hesitation out of the window and return violence with violence? Not to mention that while you are trying to restrain them they may be gouging your eyes out of your face. None of you are actually bothering to read what I have said, and if you are then you're comple…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:36 AM
1

Can you please tell me where I said that?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:07 AM
1

Thank you. I know that there are a lot of people here who have been hurt by how the system currently works, where if a man and a woman are having a fight, the man is nearly always blamed and punished for whatever happened, whether they were both violent or even it was solely the woman who was physically abusive. It sucks. And I know that a lot of what I'm saying is taken as victim-blaming. But..well thanks for taking the time to see that I am not calling for different standards when it comes to …
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:08 AM
0

Why is it ridiculous for me to say that if I learn that a group of people who I hold in high respect have a view which I think is very harmful, that my respect for them will go down? If I respect someone for their views and then learn they hold a view that I think is a bad one, how could my respect for them not go down? which is ridiculous in my opinion, if someone assaults you then you have all right to stop them into the ground to protect yourself and make sure it doesn't happen again But I ne…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:12 AM
0

Let me put it this was. No, I am not upset by the very fact that someone disagrees with me. But I am greatly discouraged by what that view is.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:58 AM
-1

Would it be more mature of me to not feel at all discouraged when I see a bunch of people holding a very harmful view? How does the fact that I'm saddened by a view that people hold factor in on my maturity?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:56 AM
0

Essentially you're saying "You NEVER hit a woman!" I never said that, nor do I believe it. I said that both parties are in the wrong, because "people should not hit people," not "You NEVER hit a woman!" Again, I realize that there are circumstances where violence is unavoidable and a person must retaliate for their own safety, whether a man or a woman. but it's tainted by your initial victim blaming Can you explain how anything I said is victim blaming? By the way, did you ever consider that ret…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:53 AM
1

I am not upset because people disagree with me. That is the very reason we're at this sub in the first place, to disagree with some of the things society deems "good" and "normal." I'm upset that someone can tell me that returning violence with violence should be unquestioned, and then other people agree with this kind of thought.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:10 AM
8

I'm damn glad to hear that my state doesn't keep public urination on the sex-offender's list forever....Do any states?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 02:21 AM
0

I do watch some news, but I figured most of the stuff you actually hear about are the outliers. And that's most unfortunate about your friend. Sadly, cops are too quick to think they know everything. If I become one after my military service, I'll try to be one of the good ones.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:47 AM
-1

No, I see cops using stun guns, pepper spray, rubber bullets, batons, pain compliance. I never see cops do that "restrain" thingy. Really? That surprises me. As you're calmly leaving the house and she's hitting you on the head with a brick (yes, this happened to a friend). I would probably put this under the category of "serious enough to use force in return." But are you implying that hitting people with bricks is the norm where you're from?
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:55 AM
-2

Yeah, violently restrain them Not if they can help it. So what you are saying is that you would run away from the problem if the person victimizing you didnt comply with what you wanted. You havent actually solved the problem and that person will likely victimize you again because now they know they can get away with it. I don't see hitting them back as any more of a real solution to the problem, really. It then just becomes a power struggle. because you are part of society's problem. You advoca…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:53 AM
-6

Yeah. Minimal force in order to neutralize a threat. And that means punching them back? When you see cops trying to neutralize a threat, do you actually think that they hit them back, unless completely necessary? Absolutely not. You see the cop restrain them. Yeah, and what happens when she starts fighting the restraining? Do you really think that someone who is willing to beat the person they live with/dating/married to is really going to stop because you are holding onto them? At what point do…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:31 AM
0

I'm currently in the process of joining the Navy, where I will be in the security field. All of the procedures call for "minimal force," which is what I would advocate for. In the instance we're talking about, where a woman is beating her partner, I would say that restraining her is a much better alternative than punching her back.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:18 AM
2

Hitting back is not self-defense in all cases, though. And there are other ways to defend yourself. Hitting back should be a last resort. I shouldn't say that hitting back is wrong in all cases, but in most I would say it is.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:00 AM
4

Upvote for doing your homework, which they obviously didn't
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:25 AM
-4

They are both in the wrong if this happens, not just the person who retaliates.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:23 AM
2

Is there any way possible for us to get a graph of time vs. number of subscribers? It'd be interesting to see
/r/MensRights01/09/12 12:27 AM
1

Crazy idea here, but how about we don't let our desires for a fair court system to dictate whether or not we believe something is murder or not?
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:59 AM
2

lol gotcha
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:16 AM
4

Without nipples, breasts lose all their function, assuming you don't have some kind of extra surgery or a device which lets a woman still be able to nurse.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:28 AM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:26 AM
2

Source?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:25 AM
5

One leaves a part of the body completely useless by removing the whole thing, one takes a small piece off which, in the majority of cases, leaves no downsides.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:41 PM
9

Parents do plenty for their kids without their consent that they believe will benefit them.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:40 PM
14

In all fairness, cutting off a small piece of flesh is not the same as cutting off someone's entire dick/breasts
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:53 PM
1

I see this as sad but unfortunately true :(
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:38 PM
7

Glad I could make someone's day a little brighter :)
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:24 PM
2

This is what I have been saying for so long, but all I ever meet with this comment is "dude, it's just not that simple, ok?" Doesn't make any sense when you break it down.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:53 PM
1

TIL that when there are discriminatory laws made against men, it's because men are sexist. What?????
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:17 PM
1

I wasn't saying you were stereotyping anybody, I was defending what I had said to gthnk. Your first post sounded as though it was attacking me.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:17 PM
1

Nobody is saying that she shouldn't be called out on it. I said that I was appalled by her behavior. But I also said that we shouldn't stereotype all women to be like this. A lot of women who frequent this subreddit would take offense.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:21 PM
4

Yes, I have to agree that even though I agree that MRA's are more reasonable here, that isn't a fair way to ask the question.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:36 PM
2

Are you seriously saying, pointing out individuals (in this case women abusing men) who act poorly is stereotyping? You are not pointing out individuals when you say "women behaving like women." That is stereotyping. I'm not saying what this woman did was right. I'm appalled by her behavior. But that doesn't give you the right to classify this as "womanly behavior" any more than they can point to a man molesting a child and call it "manly behavior." There is no one reporting on the sexism women …
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:02 AM
3

Let me ask you something. Although I disagree with you that more men than women molest children, for the sake of discussion let's assume you're right. Let's assume that more men molest children than women. That still does NOT make the policy OK. Let's say that in 20 years, we have advanced enough technology that lets us make bomb-proof sections for a bus. Essentially, cubicle-style sections of a bus that if a man/woman inside decides to let off a bomb, it hurts nobody else on the bus. Now, would…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 04:44 AM
9

In a thread about trying to dispel negative stereotypes, how is this what we should be promoting?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 04:08 AM
2

hahaha you've figured out my secret!
/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:21 AM
3

Haha it's easy to let it get to your head sometimes that the majority of the people on reddit (and the vast majority in the sub, as demonstrated by the survey) are American, but that assumption just makes the whole site feel less welcoming to others.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 12:25 PM
2

By the end when I told her how all these policies make the situation worse, she thought for a moment before saying, "yeah, I guess you're right." I'm assuming she didn't just mean that I was right that men were discriminated against, but that she was saying I was right about the policy being a bad one.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 12:22 PM
8

I guess the title should have said "why was I surprised that she held these kinds of beliefs"
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:47 AM
3

I agree completely, although I won't assume you have the same reasoning as I do. I think marriage should be a completely religious thing, while the government can set up something more that is purely legal.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 12:53 AM
4

But when cops get called on a father, he really should be thankful. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:14 AM
3

but he suspended the incarceration in favor of two years of probation with the condition she get her GED and receive counseling. Just another example where if a woman rapes someone or commits any sort of violent crime, they must need counseling, not jail time.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:32 AM
19

they do not apply to men who commit are accused of rape
/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:12 PM
2

People today watch way too much SVU
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:11 PM
-1

I understand the distinction that many sociologists have been making between sex and gender, but I believe them to be so closely intertwined that I don't really see the need for a distinction at all. People are beginning to think that the traditional roles we take are just pressured onto us by society. I disagree. Example: Through human evolution, women were generally the caregivers (because they were the ones who birthed the children). Through time, it would make sense for them to obtain a more…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:32 PM
0

I've had this conversation far too many times. gender and sex are exactly the same thing
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:04 PM
-1

You've stumped me, sir mam. Not as in "I cannot come up with a comeback" type thing, more of the rethinking my point type. I still stand by what I said, though, that I still want gender to be part of everyday life. I still don't want to walk down the street and wonder which sex everyone around me is. Because men and women are different in so many wonderful ways, and I don't want these differences between us to be diminished.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:35 AM
-4

In all honesty, no. I'm not saying it should be illegal for people to wear whatever they want, but I don't like the idea of everyone wearing the same exact thing. Men and women are different. I greatly fear that there is a time coming where people will call for gender to have no play in anything. I don't want to have to walk down the street wondering if the person I'm walking behind is a man or a woman.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:26 PM
-2

=)
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:58 AM
4

overweight people should learn to turn the other cheek. FTFY
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:45 AM
2

and if we do get a hold of him, make sure /mensrights knows about it so we can get it to the front page!
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:13 AM
6

South Park can be a really stupid show, and can be even downright gross a lot of the time. But they sometimes make really good points. I also really like the episode on tolerance.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:54 AM
2

i did like #6 a lot, but 13 is my favorite. you wouldn't believe how many women i have asked "so, would you ever consider a boy to babysit your kids?" with the answer being "no, because women are more nurturing." which may be true. but then when you suggest that men might be better at things like leadership....thats when shit goes down.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 09:03 PM
5

thank you! now i have something to show to anybody who claims the 75 cent myth is true. great video
/r/MensRights01/04/12 07:41 PM
1

you sir, are so freaking right i just cant even explain. I feel as if a lot of women really would be happier if they did what was more natural for them. But instead they believe the lies that feminists spread that if you're a stay-at-home mom, then you're a slave. I feel like a lot of women today (not all, but a lot) have told themselves this lie and choose to work full time which in the end will not bring them happiness
/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:56 PM
7

this generation, women make more money (at least than they used to). Because they wont settle for anyone who makes less than they do, they will all die childless, and the bitch gene will die too!
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:24 PM
2

i had a good friend punched in the face by his ex-gf for well, breaking up with her for being a crazy bitch. he filed a restraining order on her
/r/MensRights27/03/12 04:15 AM
1

i guess i meant by "marriage can wait" not as they want to get married at a reasonable time and all my guy friends want to do it soon, very soon. i guess i meant that all the girls say "not for at least...." and the guys usually say more along the lines of "when it's right."
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:55 AM
1

I completely agree with you (although, I do kind of identify with some of the reasons that spearhead laid out). I think it's kind of odd (and at the same time funny) that at my college, all my guy friends seem to be along the same lines as me, but all the girls i hang out with think that marriage just can wait/hinders success (no, they're not anti-men or feminist).
/r/MensRights27/03/12 01:19 AM
-5

There's a different subreddit for you. it's called r/foreveralone
/r/MensRights27/03/12 01:14 AM
2

TL;DR I have work in 10 minutes and as interesting as this article sounds, I don't have time to read through it. Anybody care to summarize?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:42 PM
-1

I really think we would need to know that harassment actually occurred at these "healthcare facilities", and that Wood was not just using her power to force those who disagree with her to keep quiet
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:39 PM
2

Thanks, I appreciate you putting it in simpler terms. We hire Lawyers not to fight our battles, but to read our long legal documents :)
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:37 PM
2

Ok first of all, today's society is only against one idea in relation to sexual orientation. And that's the more conservative view that anything other than heterosexual (or more precisely, the act of anything other than heterosexual) is wrong. There has never been a time of more sexual-orientation acceptance than now. Gay men are just as accepted as gay women in today's society (if not more so, because there are more gay men than women) Haha and second of all, when did this become about acceptin…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:23 PM
2

should i...go check it out???
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:55 PM
36

It appalls me that boys are learning at such an early age that they are in any way worse than girls. This is just a feminist backlash from what things used to be. And although I think it's great that more girls are getting into college etc, I hate to see it come at the expense of young boys. True, studies have shown that boys have a harder time sitting still, and often mature at a later age than girls. But that gives teachers no right to outright tell them that just because they are boys, that m…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:49 PM
13

I really don't think this has anything to do with the system trying to keep boys from becoming gay. The whole society is going in just the opposite direction, trying to teach that being gay is perfectly acceptable. You're just bringing up a completely different issue here.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:43 PM
2

bahahahahaha
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:28 PM
2

ok so im new to this subreddit. what does SRS stand for???
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:27 PM
10

can you just imagine the backlash if a man told a country to vote for him because of his gender? i think WW III just might hit
/r/MensRights26/03/12 02:41 PM
3

Peeta (the male hero in the Hunger Games) actually does save Katniss (the heroin) on several occasions.... just sayin'
/r/MensRights26/03/12 02:38 PM
1

i agree, i have NO idea what this has to do with getting equal rights for men...
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:13 AM
-6

child...CHILD. should not be MURDERED because it is a CHILD
/r/MensRights24/03/12 04:02 AM
1

i really think sqazm has a point here. If they were to have some joke saying that a man is stupid in the office or in a work setting, nobody would laugh (at least i dont think they would, but maybe im wrong). i see your point and i think a lot of the time men are portrayed as stupid just because they're men (and not situational), but i dont think that's exactly the case here. the only thing that frustrates me is that we can make jokes about how men are stupid when it comes to taking care of kids…
/r/MensRights24/03/12 03:48 AM
2

i literally almost cried
/r/MensRights24/03/12 03:33 AM
1

my apologies, but i really dont have any other info on the vid
/r/MensRights22/03/12 02:35 AM
1

can you...tell me the name?
/r/MensRights22/03/12 02:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter