clare988 Archive

TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Its true. it's called misogyny lol but every comment that tries to interrupt their circle jerk gets downvoted so don't bother	/r/MGTOW	26/06/19 09:59 AM
1	Women leaders are more bloodthirsty and violent: Queens have started 27% more wars, than men leaders Nah I do, actually. I think there are physical and psychological differences between men and women. I don't think women are generally more emotional though, nor impulsive. And I don't think we can automatically ascribe exhibited differences in male and female behaviour to biology; social factors are clearly relevant too. In this case, the argument of the article's author - that historically Queens shared the load of ruling and thus had more time to dedicate to foreign policy - seems far more com…	/r/MensRights	27/03/19 07:18 PM
1	Women leaders are more bloodthirsty and violent: Queens have started 27% more wars, than men leaders No to both lol	/r/MensRights	27/03/19 09:01 AM
0	Women leaders are more bloodthirsty and violent: Queens have started 27% more wars, than men leaders Good point	/r/MensRights	27/03/19 07:24 AM
1	Women leaders are more bloodthirsty and violent: Queens have started 27% more wars, than men leaders Did you even read the article? "Queens managed foreign policy and war policies, which were often important to bring in cash, while their husbands managed the state (think taxes, crime, judicial issues, etc.). As the authors theorize, “greater division of labor under queenly reigns could have enabled queens to pursue more aggressive war policies.”" But yea just ignore this and presume the explanation that makes you feel good and superior as a male. Definitely not emotional at all. (also where is …	/r/MensRights	27/03/19 07:24 AM

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter