TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

classmaster Archive

View 14 posts and 124 comments by classmaster on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

classmaster/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:48 PM
6

classmaster/r/MensRights03/10/10 12:44 PM
4

classmaster/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:08 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights06/10/10 07:25 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights05/10/10 11:04 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:59 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:52 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:42 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights04/10/10 09:18 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights03/10/10 10:50 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:22 PM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights02/10/10 08:49 AM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights01/10/10 09:10 AM
0

classmaster/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:37 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Answer the question please.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 01:36 PM
-13

Interesting. How do you feel when I call you a pathetic mangina troll?
/r/MensRights10/10/10 12:35 PM
0

I've fucked a few Feminists in my day, and brother, you speak the truth.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 07:48 AM
-1

Feminists of that era championed two issues: sufferage and prohibition. Unfortunately, only the latter has been repealed.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 07:44 AM
-6

This is not a men's rights issue. If a boy was dying, maybe I'd care.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 03:32 PM
0

Thanks, you're adorable.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 01:27 PM
3

Excellent advice.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 07:16 AM
1

I don't know what she plays on 2XC, but on /r/mensrights, she's a concern troll.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 07:15 AM
-4

Cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 11:16 PM
-10

Feminism is the collective action of women. It is impossible to be upset with Feminism and not be upset with women.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:54 PM
-5

Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:49 PM
-3

Fuck you. I am high.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:46 PM
-10

Someone has to keep the Feminists in check. The mods won't do it.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:42 PM
1

2XC is reddit's menstrual cup. Drink therefrom, and you drink to your peril.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:40 PM
-12

I identify as a feminist GTFO.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:15 PM
1

Maybe you're a decent guy, but you should know: you're a textbook concern troll.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:12 PM
-2

Training a spouse to be responsible with her spending is not a bad thing. A wife who must beg her husband for money will learn to be far more prudent with her purchases. This is often necessary, because working husbands simply do not have time to do the shopping.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:42 PM
-1

I don't think this can be a fruitful discussion -- you've allowed your hatred for your grandfather to cloud your objectivity.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:23 PM
-3

Stop trolling.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:14 PM
0

Even trolls make valid arguments from time to time, if only to maintain their deception.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:09 PM
1

This is incredibly insightful. Could you give some more examples of natural differences between males and females? I think this is really the heart of the issue.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:06 PM
-4

This is exactly the traditional model of husbandry that Feminists seek to criminalize as abuse.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 01:58 PM
-5

A husband that arbitraily assigns a low amount of money to the wife and requires that she justify all expenses as a way to track her behavior and movements and not allow her to create a social life is abuse. It is about mtivation and degree of control that makes it abuse. It's not abuse, it's responsible husbandry.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 01:27 PM
-4

Feminists have expanded the definition of abuse so broadly that it now encompasses the traditional definition of husband. You see no problem here? In case you've forgotten, words are what laws are made of.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 01:21 PM
-9

This is not abuse. It's natural for a husband to control a household's finances. If you don't believe me, check out the etymology of the word "husband."
/r/MensRights07/10/10 12:50 PM
-2

The Jewish influence over corporate media is pervasive and obvious to any idiot.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:18 AM
-2

Your anti-catholic bias is irrelevant to the validity of the study in question. Please try to use logic -- this is a men's rights forum.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:15 AM
0

I'm not a partisan, I'm a realist. Conservatives may be douchebags, but at least they're antifeminist douchebags who stand some chance getting elected.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:01 AM
-1

The "science" you seek is suppressed because it is a threat to female reproductive hegemony.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:52 AM
-1

If men's rights is your top priority, vote conservative. If men's rights is not your top priority, GTFO. This is a men's rights forum.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:45 AM
0

What do you expect? We're not allowed to say "Jewish controlled" anymore.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:42 AM
0

have issues with how some things are portrayed in the MRM as a whole (why i have my blog) I've read your blog, and breathlessly await the day your considerable writing talent is put to better use than concern trolling.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:40 AM
-1

http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/3151
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:30 AM
-1

So men's rights are a low priority for you.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 09:17 PM
-1

LOL
/r/MensRights06/10/10 09:16 PM
1

Yahoo Answers is a vital window on contemporary idiocy.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 07:49 PM
-3

Some MRAs are Christian. Please try to be inclusive.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 07:47 PM
3

% females who manipulate with sex > % of women who orgasm from sex. Just saying . . .
/r/MensRights06/10/10 07:39 PM
2

I read this as: "Teenage girls more sexually attractive than boys, new research shows"
/r/MensRights06/10/10 07:33 PM
0

"Moobs" are not a natural phenomenon. Female hormones, from the urine of women on birth control and HRT, are now endemic in water systems. The femininzation of males is directly attributable Feminist "medicine." This is widely acknowledged in the medical community, but nothing is done. The sidebar's correct: "there is an international, feminist, antimale conspiracy."
/r/MensRights06/10/10 06:58 PM
1

Feminists on reddit daemonize men for fucking (and not fucking) women in real life.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:35 PM
1

Mongamy is the female reproductive strategy. Men in monogamous relationship are being exploited.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:31 PM
1

Of course not. Did the semicolon confuse you?
/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:29 PM
-1

Grow up. I'm talking about men in general, not deviant men.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:27 PM
-1

Gay men are allied with Feminists.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:25 PM
2

Better safe than sire.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:21 PM
0

whose name?
/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:19 PM
1

Negotiating boundaries ≠ rape
/r/MensRights05/10/10 10:16 PM
0

You've never noticed that most conversations with Feminists on reddit yield exactly this kind of accusation?
/r/MensRights04/10/10 09:43 PM
-3

I only have sex with girls I'm not in relationships with. It's the only safe option.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 08:20 PM
7

Don't stick your dick in crazy. If men actually followed this rule, 9 out of 10 women would be unfuckable. The real answer is anonymous sex. Think of a girl as jewel heist. Get in. get out. Leave no evidence.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 08:15 PM
-2

Fuck that. I'm a man; I fuck girls. As long as a man covers his tracks and conceals his true identity, anonymous sex is 99% safe.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 08:09 PM
1

Have you ever dated a heterosexual woman?
/r/MensRights04/10/10 12:39 AM
0

"Wrong" gender roles are those that are evolutionarily maladaptive.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 12:31 AM
0

You've got it backwards: you're the victimizer.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 12:02 AM
2

Feel free to use it however you like, but I absolve myself of all liability when you are attacked by packs of rabid feminists.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 11:30 PM
6

We've come to clearly see that "feminism is about equality" is great rhetoric, but it is nothing more than propaganda. Feminism has not in a single instance, anywhere, ever been willing to allow men to gain if it in anyway was a loss to women. Exactly.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 11:07 PM
14

He needs to leverage the restraining order to his advantage. Remember he's not just a Costco customer, he's a card-carrying member.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 08:06 PM
19

I don't care what happened. Get a restraining order. Now. Preemptive action is key here. If you wait for her to strike first, which you know she will, you've already lost. The next move is to call her work, and explain the situation to the store manager. If you can't get her fired, you may be able shift her schedule so she's not working when it is convenient for you to shop. Emphasize that this is to be done secretly, as you fear your ex may respond violently if she knows of your involvement. Al…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 07:38 PM
1

Wow, yeah, next time I'll just tie the girl down and fuck her without saying anything. That's much less rapey. You don't know shit about sex, let alone BDSM.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 06:55 PM
1

I've never raped a woman in my life. Yes, I've hit women, tied them down, gagged them, fucked them to tears . . . But it was always consensual. Most women, once you talk them into it, are sluts for bondage.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 06:44 PM
2

Lying about my name, my relationship goals, or whatever is never rape. In certain very narrow circumstances, lying can be rape (i.e. a transvestite seducing a heterosexual) but the lies I tell to get women in bed don't even come close. I don't force my DNA on women. They love it. And if they don't, they have the legal right to murder it. What you call my "self-entitled thinking" is only this: heterosexual pride. I, as a straight man, have as much right to random dirty meaningless sex as a homose…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 06:39 PM
1

Don't misunderstand me: I have great respect for prostitutes, and if the sex market were a free market, it wouldn't be an issue. The problem with the current system is that it's monopolistic -- as long as women as a class (and feminists in particular) manipulate men through the granting and withholding sex, prostitution will continue to be a form of male exploitation.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 06:10 PM
-2

go on . . .
/r/MensRights03/10/10 05:57 PM
-4

Whatcha gonna do about it? Cunnilingus the ghost of Ada Lovelace a little longer? No wonder you're 2XC's favorite pet.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:50 PM
-5

Necessary distinction: "deadbeat" dads do not murder their children.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:38 PM
2

Upvoted for completely appropriate use of CAPSLOCK.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:36 PM
0

You apparently have a lot to learn about human mating rituals.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:33 PM
2

Protip: girls sitting alone at bars are easy.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:32 PM
-3

Are you also now going to complain that football should be only for men Women have a place in football. It's called cheerleading.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:02 PM
-3

You end up with people who are underqualified and that don't try as hard because they know they won't be fired. Absolutely. The women and minorities I've worked with have been far less competent than my white male colleagues.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 12:17 PM
0

Men have evolved to pursue multiple sex partners. Unfortunately, most of us are too pussywhipped to follow our true natures.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 10:08 AM
0

I prefer the term "misandriarchy" to "matriarchy." We are ruled by man-haters.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 09:24 AM
-4

I don't give a cold shit what goes on over at 2XC; you've mistaken me for someone who cares what girls think.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 09:15 AM
-4

Recognizing women's potential for evil is a central tenet of the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 12:48 AM
-3

Males are naturally dominant. Submissive men are the psychosexual victims of cultural misandry.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:39 PM
-1

Just because women are people doesn't mean they deserve to be treated as people. Respect must be earned.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:06 PM
1

classmaster is always classy baby. Now fix yourself a drink and shut up for a second while I explain something. I have a biological imperative to fuck as many women as my biology allows. It is my right as a man, and it is an a priori good. Fucking is good. If a baby pops out nine months later, maybe that's a miracle and shit, but it's not classmaster's problem. classmaster slipped out around 4AM. And although I'll never meet my kids, I'm happy knowing they'll be scrappy bastards, and surely bett…
/r/MensRights02/10/10 09:59 PM
-4

When I fuck women, I'm powerful. When I'm bored, I masturbate.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 09:25 PM
1

Kids from single parent families have more kids themselves. It's called sociology. Google it.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 09:22 PM
-2

You're actually comparing casual sex to rape? You're the most sexually repressed queer I've ever met.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 09:13 PM
-1

You think casual sex is misogyny? Are you also saving yourself for marriage?
/r/MensRights02/10/10 03:05 PM
1

quantity over quality.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 02:53 PM
-3

You don't get laid at the sperm bank.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 02:46 PM
-3

A woman's sex is her most valuable asset. Prohibiting a woman from selling her sex is every bit as absurd as prohibiting a man from selling his labor. It has become clear to me that Feminism is nothing more than the OPEC of sexuality; it manipulates the availability of sex in order to artificially inflate its value.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 11:35 AM
3

I'm familiar with the kids from "manhood 101." They make a lot of good points, but their public relations strategy is basically trolling. I can't support that. Here's my advice to you: go out tonight, find a girl sitting alone at a bar or a club and buy her drinks until she takes you home with her. Fuck her brains out.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:59 AM
1

You need to look at this from an evolutionary perspective. The chances of your offspring passing on your genes are far higher if you father, say, 10 children anonymously, rather than dedicate all your resources to a wife and 2.5 kids.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:48 AM
-1

It's a man's choice to spread his seed or sheathe his dick. A strategy of anonymous sex, properly executed, should protect him from post-coital responsibility in both scenarios.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:32 AM
-1

It's the likely alternative. Feel free to take your chances in family court if you don't believe me.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:25 AM
2

When the alternative is a lifetime paying child support for a kid you aren't even allowed see, yes, it's a start.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 10:04 AM
2

I'm new around here, but I find it both shocking and disgusting that Feminists can just waltz in, derail the conversation, pat us on the heads, and then get upvoted. Is this a new phenomenon, or has /r/mensrights always been a Feminist stomping ground?
/r/MensRights02/10/10 09:49 AM
0

Thanks, I just googled that. Leykis makes a lot of good points, but ultimately, he still seems to support the idea of forming relationships with women. That's a critical error in thinking as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 09:43 AM
-1

Just remember to pocket that condom before you slip out the door.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 09:37 AM
0

It works for me.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 09:21 AM
28

So, Men of /MR. have there been moments in your lives where you felt your sexuality was actually valued? When I'm pounding a girl, and she's wet and writhing and screaming out for her God, yeah, I feel like my "sexuality is actually valued." When I meet a girl for a date, and it's obvious she's just spent hours on her clothes and hair and makeup, trying to make herself hot enough for me to fuck her, yes, I feel like my "sexuality is actually valued." When I'm surfing for porn and I realize that …
/r/MensRights02/10/10 07:26 AM
3

children > females> men If you understand why this is discriminatory, you are aeons ahead of the Feminist "justice" system.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 10:00 PM
7

Who are we to argue with tradition? ;)
/r/MensRights01/10/10 09:46 PM
-1

I'm not interested in abstractions; I'm interested in reality.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 05:07 PM
0

Prostitutes are not goods, but they do provide services. Sex has always been, and will continue to be, woman's most marketable skill. Prostitutes (at least the clever ones) are sexual entrepreneurs -- they benefit from the ability to sell their services, just as men benefit from the availability of said services. Government has no legitimate interest in criminalizing prostitution. It violates the fundamental right of freedom to contract.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 04:55 PM
0

A computer program is meaningless without a computer to run it on. Ms. Lovelace's "achievement" is the functional equivalent of completing a four star sudoku puzzle.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 04:39 PM
0

The idea was objectively badass.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 04:19 PM
1

People are encouraged to take pride in their Native American heritage (even if it they're less than 1% Indian), but if you take pride in your European heritage, somehow you're suddenly a redneck racist douchebag. It's a double standard.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 03:39 PM
-4

I understand that some unfortunate individuals suffer from birth defects that have rendered them neither male nor female. We should feel sympathy for these "hermaphrodites," but we should not confuse them with transsexuals. Transsexuality is neither a biological or psychological condition. It is political identity premised on the very theory of socially constructed gender you so correctly criticize. In reality, transsexuals are merely homosexuals seeking to secure the perceived advantages of the…
/r/MensRights01/10/10 03:29 PM
1

His German-Italian ancestry.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 03:08 PM
-1

All that suggests is that women's cranial inferiority is proportionate to their physical inferiority. What's your point exactly?
/r/MensRights01/10/10 02:58 PM
3

Why on earth do you think "feminist propaganda is hate speech by definition"? Just as a swastika or a pamphlet denying the holocaust is hate speech simply due to its in inextricable association with Nazism, Feminist propaganda is hate speech due to it's inextricable association to Feminism (which, like Nazism, is a hate movement -- check out Feminist eugenicist Margaret Sanger if you feel this is an unfair comparison). Do you also think posts about men's rights are hate speech? No. Men's rights …
/r/MensRights01/10/10 02:22 PM
-5

Perhaps with a constructive critique of my argument?
/r/MensRights01/10/10 02:10 PM
1

Until someone calls the cops . . .
/r/MensRights01/10/10 01:32 PM
1

There is an important distinction between malicious domestic abuse and responsible corporal punishment. By conflating the two, Feminism has criminalized husbands for -gasp!- engaging in husbandry (e.g. "management of domestic affairs or of resources generally".) And people wonder why marriage is broken . . .
/r/MensRights01/10/10 01:20 PM
-2

White man mocked for expressing pride. No news here.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 12:42 PM
-4

"Gendercide" is a typically inflammatory feminist description of what is in reality a healthy free-market process. It's no secret that men produce more wealth and innovation than women, and it should be no surprise that rational parents operating free from government interference will opt more often for male rather than female children. Some red-blooded men might fear there won't be enough women "to go around," but the market provides the solution to this as well: prostitution.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 12:21 PM
-4

It is existentially impossible for a transsexual "man" to know what it is to be a real man. In reality, transsexual "men" are butch lesbians attempting to cash in on what they have been deluded to believe is "male privilege." Pathetic.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 11:56 AM
0

There used to be laws against that sort of thing . . .
/r/MensRights01/10/10 11:38 AM
-4

Herpes is too good for her. She deserves syphilis with a side of AIDS.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 11:26 AM
-2

This absurd piece of feminist social engineering will not give men breasts, and it will not change the basic fact that breastfeeding (like most "women's work") has little real economic value. Rather than distorting the market with nanny-state interference, we should return to the only family system that has ever worked: stay-at-home-motherhood.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 11:14 AM
3

Feminism teaches women to dominate men, but in reality, it is women who want to be dominated. Evolution trumps ideology.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 10:57 AM
-8

Exactly. No amount of feminist social engineering can change the simple fact that women are ill-suited to certain fields of endeavor. It's not only obvious, but scientifically proven that men are just better certain things. We have bigger brains and bigger muscles; that's not Patriarchy, it's reality. EDIT: To all you downvoters: do you really deny that men have larger brains and larger muscles than women? I thought this was men's rights forum, not a politically correct hivemind.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 10:38 AM
0

You have not only the right, but a moral responsibility to teach her a lesson.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 10:22 AM
1

Absolutely. Joking about prison rape is hate speech -- it should be punishable by imprisonment.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 10:06 AM
0

What are they doing? EDIT: If you're suggesting more draconian law enforcement, I don't think that's the way to go, especially given the overwhelmingly misandrist bias of the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 09:52 AM
-1

The sexist myth that men are rapists and women are innocent victims is very much behind the present policy (and you are right to describe that view as uniformed). In reality, the effect of the policy is higher rates of rape among both male and female prison populations, but because men are incarcerated at astronomically higher rates, it is men, as usual, who are most fucked by the system.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 09:47 AM
-1

Fighting prison rape is not stupid. You may disagree with my means, but I hope you agree with the end.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 09:27 AM
4

Feminist propaganda is hate speech by definition. She should be in jail.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 08:18 AM
-1

Using language like "bitches", "cunts", or other degrading language does little to improve the nature/respectability of MRAs. I absolutely agree. Do you hate women? I don't hate women, but I don't like them. Feminism's abuses have proven beyond doubt that females, acting collectively, are incapable of moral or ethical conduct. Did you develop your views because you've been burned in the past? All men have been "burned" by women. Both by individual women, and by women collectively (e.g. "Feminism…
/r/MensRights01/10/10 12:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter