TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

claytakephotos Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by claytakephotos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You're going for the DITF technique, asking me to data mine an entire sub. A sub that's primarily overlapping with people from subs like this one. The likelihood of seeing what you're requesting is going to be obviously less likely because the people who post there (and similarly, here) have to have victim complexes to begin with. Like, no shit, it's going to be tough to prove things based upon your criteria. A mod log would be far more useful and appropriate. It's less circumstantial, so the da…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:50 PM
0

You do realize how terrible of a premise that argument is, right?
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:37 PM
1

How would I have proof without a mod report? Every single ban-happy subreddit has been staunchly pro-feminist, no exception. Which explains why I'm banned from WhiteRights, UncensoredNews, conservative, The_Donald, thealtright, New_Right, etc etc etc....
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:33 PM
1

There are too many flaws in your logic.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 05:18 AM
0

Yeah, because that dude isn't a mod. He's just a community member. This sub frequently bans people. I'm sure at least a good portion come from opinions they don't agree with.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:42 AM
2

I'm not upset, I'm saying that your argument is based on a debatable premise: more like females making everything complicated for themselves. and that your conditional is blatantly incorrect: if men decided to start placing social hurdles for their own sex which makes your conclusion: it would be deceiving to call that female privilege. Unproven Your entire understanding of the discussion is exceptionally limited. You deliberately ignore the notion that women could be imposing social hurdles upo…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 10:14 PM
-1

This is such a stupid reply that I don't even know where to begin. You should take a forensics course at your local JC or something, so you can learn how to make a logically consistent argument.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:20 PM
-3

So much cringe. You belong in /r/gatekeeping
/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:18 PM
-6

You keep posting this comment. It's almost as if you're not realizing that you are the one policing these conversations.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 08:42 PM
-2

Because men have never placed social hurdles on themselves, ever, you pussy.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 08:36 PM
-5

I think your comment was lazy. :P Edit: case in point, the dude stopped replying after a smart ass comment.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:06 PM
-3

Not really. The whole point of the original post is that people have been encouraged to go down certain paths because of shitty social constructs. The argument isn't to mandate equality, but to keep perspective on what equality would imply (mostly proportional representation in most facets of life, because the market would select people by their talent and personal desires, as opposed to outward forces they've no control over). Asians in ivy league schools and Jews in the Senate is an arbitrary …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 01:45 PM
2

Evidence was provided in a follow up comment at the time of my posting.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 10:55 PM
17

Typically, it's best to provide stats right back when you make a counter claim.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 07:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter