TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

clothes-of-sand Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by clothes-of-sand on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

And what was that? You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:36 PM
2

Dailywire is Ben Shapiros site. He almost certainly is making the same criticism you are, not defending it.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:50 PM
4

Why?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:06 PM
8

its working!
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:22 PM
0

link?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:52 PM
10

Yes, he stereotyped badly and got called out on it. You take one post and stereotype the entire sub so you're getting called out. You want us to fuck off from our own sub? Just stop posting if you don't like the sub and are not able to try to understand it in good faith.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:58 PM
2

what types of things were said in the discussion? I can't listen to the podcast right now.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:53 PM
-9

Peeing standing up is gross. Congrats, you've spread piss all over your washroom. What a man.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:52 AM
-6

Peeing standing up is gross. I'm man and always sit down when peeing. Why would you not sit to pee in your own house. Bunch of philistines.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:50 AM
1

Your ignorance of economy is evident by thensimplistic notion of choice you have regarding employment options, as if there is an endless bufet of jobs available for people to choose from if they don't like one with particular health concerns, rather than the reality, which is that there are generally less jobs than there are individuals looking for them and your laissez faire approach essentially guarantees a race to the bottom. You have complete ignorance over how the modern economy developed a…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 06:21 PM
0

Wearing a tie and wearing high heals are not the same. Where did you imply? When you said there shouldnt be safety laws at work. When you advocated for a complete laissez faire system. Heels are known to be brutal for your body and are unnecessary. No one in any sort of progressive, sophisticated society should have to undergo such completely unnecessary harm to make a paycheque. Your "just dont work there" argument shows a complete lack of awareness of how the economy works. Many people dont ha…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 03:02 PM
1

Dont be so overly dramatic. The human race isnt going to starve to death if women stop wearing high heals. There are tons of laws about the health and safety of employees. Yes you cant eliminate all risk but you can mitigate it to the extent possible and eliminate all unnecessary risk. That is the standard. Working on high rises is inherently dangerous so we make laws forcing companies to impose costly safety standards because we can get the job done while also limiting how many construction wor…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 02:29 PM
5

No offence, but cheaters almost always blame external factors/their significant other.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 05:16 AM
2

No, the way capitalism works, there absolutely should be laws banning employers from demanding employees do dangerous or significantly unhealthy things. We've come a long way since the initial stages of the industrial revolution.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 05:11 AM
8

Its not about punching women in the face. Its about defending and standing up for yourself and not letting this idea that women are allowed to hit men continue to thrive.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:06 AM
0

What should he do then?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:00 AM
5

Link?
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:05 PM
1

I can only conclude that you're full of shit or a troll. Pathetic hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 02:57 PM
1

When you assert something you're supposed to back it up with fact. Still waiting for that source my friend.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:44 PM
12

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:56 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:39 AM
3

Of course not.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:25 PM

OK, you know what, you've convinced me.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:03 PM

Fair enough. There were at least 655 official women war deaths. There likely were more that weren't recognized, as well as many civilian deaths. All in all, there is no reason not to recognize their sacrifice and it's petty to make an issue out of this. I'll go agitate for fairer treatment of men in family court and more awareness of mental health issues affecting men--you go complain about women's contribution to the war effort being recognized on the radio.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:47 PM
4

This is literally the least of men's concerns. Congrats, you've identified the MRM version of the manspreading campaign.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:06 AM

This is a dumb thing to get upset about. Thousands of women died in the war, no? Women were slaughtered and they can be recognized for that. This is some petty bullshit to get mad about.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:03 AM
2

what
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:02 AM
4

Then go get circumcised. Isn't it great that you have the choice as an adult?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:53 AM
5

Don't compare them. Why do we need to compare them? The only comparison necessary is that they both need to be illegal, fullstop.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:51 AM
5

This wasn't about advocacy. It was a desperate act from a man trying to escape his suffering. And even then, there is no doubt that committing suicide and leaving a note like this raises awareness.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:35 PM
6

This is stupid. Of course women should be allowed to breastfeed in public. Grow up.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 07:43 PM
1

Yeah it does. You seem very ignorant. Are you a freeman of the land per chance?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:57 PM
1

This is a ridiculous statement.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:54 PM
5

It's not being an asshole. It's a valid criticism. If a movement wants to effect change it needs to know how to communicate.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:53 AM
5

Yeah I saw 41 min and immediately left. Don't have time/don't care enough to spend almost an hour listening to an analysis of a Disney movie.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:24 AM
1

I'm in favour of keeping both names under publication ban.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:10 PM
3

Well it would be the defendant's choice whether to waive the publication ban, if necessary because they believe there is a miscarriage of justice.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:49 PM
3

It's really pathetic that you go to againstmensrights to shit post. Well it's more creepy than anything. Stalk this sub, then shit post over there. Then ban anyone who disagrees. Doing gods work.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:12 AM
5

No, that's not how it works. Please educate yourself before speaking.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 08:56 PM
8

Her tweet was great. "I don't hate men. I have sons and brothers". I'm not racist. I have black friends!
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:58 PM
48

The weakness is his argument is that he didn't address the counter that parents in general are free to make all sorts of decisions that affect their kids' lives. The response is that most aren't permanent like circumcision or otherwise are justified as being in the best interests of the child, which circumcision isn't. He should have addressed this because it's a comment retort, and people in the comments are making the argument.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:40 PM
2

Alright man, thanks for your contribution to the discussion. Your opinion has been noted.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:17 PM
4

...read by tens of thousands of people.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:08 PM
5

It's not a tweet. It's an article published in a mainstream magazine.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 03:59 PM
6

It's a mainstream magazine and an example of how feminist ideology operates. It has a circulation of thousands and thousands of people. That you are outraged that this would be a topic of criticism on the Men's Right subreddit is really obtuse. If you don't feel like discussing the topic at hand, then go to a subreddit about your interests. You could go to againstmensrights and lodge your complaint, for example.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 03:50 PM
10

shared 55 times liked 71 times Or were you referring to your own comment?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 03:12 PM
1

Who is Janet?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 03:43 AM
1

They're different kinds of offences. One is a traffic offence, the other a criminal one. In any case, I was responding to guy who said the federal government doesn't create the limit, which is wrong. It creates the criminal limit.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:01 PM
0

Huh? Both levels of government create a legal limit.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:33 AM
0

They both do.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:25 AM
1

She peed her pants and was unconscious.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:19 AM
1

What day, time?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter