TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

clydry Archive

View 1 post and 83 comments by clydry on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

There would be a couple of additional factors - In terms of reporting, they'll be far more likely to report sexual activity with a woman than with someone of the same sex. The amount of forced activity is a bit lower (about 80% female victimizers), though still very high. And, sadly, I bet the male staff are watched more carefully than the female staff. Edit: Just noticed that the "gay" (or non-heterosexual) victims - were 10 TIMES more likely to be victimized by their fellow students (presumabl…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 11:47 AM
1

Half of the bachlorette/hen parties these days wander around with all sorts of penis-shaped paraphernalia, male blow-up dolls, etc. I don't think they are suddenly getting sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:23 AM
2

Who needs the NSA if this is our future.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:59 PM
2

I don't know, I see this as more steps in the wrong direction. Flirting between a T.A. and a student is forbidden because it's "sexual harassment?" Aren't TAs basically older students/graduate students? I don't want the same crazily strict standards applied to both genders, I want less crazily strict standards.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:18 PM
3

Honestly, that seems a little ridiculous. Am I missing something? First years shouldn't be having sex now? Dating someone younger than you is taking advantage? Aren't they 18/19? Legal age? Does the U.S. (or maybe U.K. if you are calling them first years) want to raise the age of consent to 20 now?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:15 PM
1

Hmm, if it's a long skirt, the mens bike might be better. Or can you use those bands guys use on pants to keep them out of the chain?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:33 PM
3

Obscure? He's not Eminem, but he (and Odd Future) are relatively well-known. I mean I know who he is, and I don't follow music at all.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:31 PM
4

That's the reason they make "womens" bicycles with the slanting cross bar.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:22 PM
2

Whoops, I guess its actually TIL. Anyway, its about a man whose wife accused him of abusing her in order to get him locked away, because he had evidence of her embezzling money.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:31 PM
6

Definitely, all government benefits - like the pension and health care benefits - should be equal. And more money should be spent targeting mental health/suicide issues. However, some of that is behavioral. Men, especially poorer men, tend to drink a lot more and smoke a lot more. And personally, I think that's fine. I'm against aggressive nanny states (no smoking! no drinking!) or the idea that women and men are exactly the same and should act exactly the same. And OTT titles like that just mak…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:23 PM
2

Do they generally refuse to comply with court orders seeking account access? Or is it specific to this case?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 11:10 AM
18

I'm not sure the millions of henchmen are really the best comparison, as I assume (I don't want to have to read her stuff), she's talking about deaths given emotional weight in the game. However, while it's probably true that more games kill the hero's wife/daughter/girlfriend/mother/female cat than husband/son/boyfriend/father/male dog, I'm guessing she's conveniently ignoring the number of male "colleagues"/partners that tend to be killed for emotional weight/revenge (i.e. fellow cop/soldier/e…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 10:42 AM
8

Well, some accuse feminists of being led by man-hating lesbians. This is just the same things (i.e. MRAs are led by women-hating gay men). I think it's a lazy insult both ways.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:05 AM
3

The articles I've read make no mention of women-only for the HIV tests. He seemed to use a different handle: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ff4v6/i_would_like_to_sue_the_federal_government_under/
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:41 AM
4

Thus the second part of my comment "or a good deal of legal knowledge" - if he's going in without a lawyer, he needs to know a good bit about where to file what paperwork, how to correctly word things, etc. For a claim in small claims court, sure. To sue the federal government for a bias case - unlikely ;)
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:20 PM
57

Where are you getting your information? This is your second thread where you want to suit about gender bias in obamacare that you've gotten wrong. For that matter, I suspect your ideas of our legal system are a bit off - you can't just up and issue a lawsuit without paying a lawyer, or a good degree of your own legal knowledge.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 10:45 PM
4

Unfortunately, when people kow-tow to political correctness, it generally devolves into double standards. Speaking of a bit of an MRA double standard here - does this mean people will stop complaining about how we shouldn't make "prison rape" jokes because they're offensive? Personally, I'm perfectly fine with any rape joke (women, men, prisoners, dogs), as long as it's actually funny, and not just relying on shock for effect.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:33 PM
5

Well, most office jobs now require a university degree - one of the correlations with women.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:43 PM
4

Well, there's a huge range to it. There's teasing gently teasing someone ("I love cock" if they leave their facebook loved in), which is generally harmless. Then there's more hostile teasing, generally related to some sort of behavior - "You want to go see Twilight? What are you, some sort of fag?", which tends to reinforce gender roles (i.e. men shouldn't go see "romantic movies"). So, in some respects, male homosexuality is becoming separated into two froms - effeminate and not-effeminate. Bei…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:35 PM
3

No way. Our presidents are getting younger and younger. She's too old now.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:05 PM
4

Could they legally ban mens rights groups but allow fraternities?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:03 PM
15

You don't understand the chart. They won't have to pay higher premiums than women. Now they now they pay LOWER premiums than women, and with Obamacare, the premiums will be equal, so the premium men pay now will increase. If they're doing that with health insurance though, I'd wish they'd gender equalize all insurance premiums - i.e. auto insurance rates for men are much higher than womens. To be honest, you, of all people, should be thankful for Obamacare. If you're jobless, you will be getting…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:01 PM
3

I'd give Zidane as an excellent example as someone who made the poor choice to respond with violence to a verbal provocation, and lost the World Cup because of it.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:41 PM
3

Well, except Lucas ;)
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:38 PM
0

No, agreed it's not spam (presumably, I don't know what the policy of posting links to one's own articles/blogs are). Looking at the rest of the blog, it does seem to come from the far-right conservative wing of the MRAs though.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:36 PM
4

In depends on the nature of the teasing, a lot of which can have hostile undertones. As an example, I worked in a summer camp where several of the, relatively-jockish, male counselors would say things (to the boys) like "Why are you doing X/why do you want to do X? That's weird? Are you gay?" in relatively hostile tones. When no females were presents (for one because the females there were uber-PC and would've have jumped on them for it). You can absolutely bet that influenced the kids behaviors…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:33 PM
2

The term has been perverted by cultural usage, but in essence, it comes from animal norms. An alpha male (or female) is generally the leader of the pack, or exceedingly successful male/female. Practically speaking, anyone extremely successful in a field could be considered an alpha. Bill Gates is totally alpha.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:18 PM
10

Straight men frequently tease each other for being 'gay', or exhibiting 'gay'-tendencies all the time, with or without women present. Even those who wouldn't tease an actual gay guy, tease their straight-friends about it. While it definitely increases in the presence of the opposite sex, its absolutely reductive to claim it's all women. It's like feminists who try and claim "slut-shaming" is all the work of men, when a lot of it comes from women. I think both genders are complicit in enforcing t…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:14 PM
4

SRS is an aggressively PC group that flags anything they feel is sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc., etc. People love to complain about them and their influence, but in reality, they only have about 30,000 users. MRA is the "equivalent" to feminism, pushing for equal rights for both genders, and like feminism, attracts many different types - from reasonable to fringe - who interpret what it means to them. I'd say the major goals of MRAs are legal parity in parental rights, alimony, an…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:07 PM
4

Yeah, that was definitely creepy on his part. Expelled is a little OTT though - removed from the class would be suitable.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:01 PM
3

In theory yes, in practice it makes me a little nervous that they are doing it out of pressure from religious groups. I do find her comment "And how quickly we forget our local history." amusing. Like the fact that you forget that the Young MENS Christian Association used to be only for men to swim in (vs the YWCA).
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:58 PM
3

That title is a bit misleading - based on the statistics in the article, men aren't "fleeing" colleges - they are increasingly going to college. Their attendance just hasn't increased as much as women's has. Honestly, I think the whole university gender disparity bit is overstated. In theory, there SHOULD be more women in university. Why? Because more of the skilled (and unskilled) blue collar jobs, which don't require a university degree, are better suited for men. I'm not sure there will ever …
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:53 PM
2

Well, lots of people love to claim that feminism is lead by man-hating lesbians. Claiming MRAs are lead by women-hating gay men is basically them reversing the same insult back. It's nonsensical but not surprising.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:40 PM
4

Well the Christians basically use "traditional family" to mean "no gays", I'm not sure if he is/isn't using it the same sense.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:47 PM
7

You're right - the article says abusing "her kids" - implying they aren't his. Sad state of affairs.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:51 AM
1

I take bullying seriously, I was just confused by the title OP gave it. I thought it would be a study/statistics showing how men are more hesitant to report violent crime or something like that.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:37 AM
2

Some women definitely will. I'd look for the women that are also adamant that they also don't want children, not just the ones that are accepting that you don't want them (and perhaps expecting you to change your mind later).
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:25 AM
2

I might be wrong, but I think this is satire, just not that well done (he should've pushed it a bit farther, but it's the sex addicts anonymous bit that pushes it over for me). It does start with Louis CK, after all.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:17 AM
1

Petition to free her? A 28 yo teacher who sleeps with students absolutely should not be freed.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:10 AM
5

Not strictly accurate - historically, men who couldn't participate in draft or got out of it have still been able to vote.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:07 AM
7

I'd have to agree, this seems to be some sort of far-right Tea Party/conservative blog.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:04 AM
17

Not to sound like I'm victim blaming, but why the fuck would you stay with someone who you filmed abusing children?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:58 PM
2

Where are you meeting these women? Online? If I were you, I'd actually put on my profile that I'm not interested in being father (don't mention the vasectomy), to attract women with a similar lack of desire for kids.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:55 PM
1

Is this the correct link? It seems to be some fiction story about a guy and bullies, not a report on violent crime.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:50 PM
6

If only. For a start, it's probably something like "Jury awards Chicago family $300,000 and their lawyers $1,000,000 for botched circumcision."
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:37 PM
5

For anyone who wants to judge the show itself: http://www.dr.dk/tv/se/blachman/blachman-6-6#!/ It even has English subtitles. NSFW, obviously. And this is public tv in Denmark btw. Can you imagine if they put naked women on PBS in the US?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:30 PM
9

It's the "ladies night" rules - i.e. to give cheap/free entrance to women to clubs and bars, hoping they'll show up, and thus more men will then come. Though its intentions are clearly being perverted here. In theory the law is gender-equal (though the description of it by the paper isn't) - an establishment could, in theory, offer reduced prices to men instead of women. In practice, the only time I've seen this happen in my life was a strip club catering to gay men.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:23 PM
16

Yeah, it seems a little demeaning to the women even.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:18 PM
4

Well, here's the thing - she doesn't want a debate, or to exchange ideas, she wants publicity. She'd probably deign to debate someone she considered "high-profile", who could help her increase profile. Someone like Vacula? Not a chance. My god, he doesn't even have a wikipedia page ;)
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:08 PM
5

I agree. I think focusing on legal issues (father's rights, false rape claims) generally brings positive responses. If someone started talking to me in real life about how some commercial "objectifies men", I'd probably exit from the conversation quickly (the same as I do with people who complain about "objectifying women"). I think that sort of BS only really appeals to masturbatory academic types (and turns off the rest of the world), who aren't worth talking to. And realistically - how much g…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:23 AM
1

Like possibly statutory rape.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:48 AM
0

Sorry, I don't understand your comment.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 11:47 PM
9

The top two comments are complaining about the double standard. How is that a downer?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:13 PM
4

I'm very surprised at this, I thought Italy was a much more "traditional" place, and that feminism would have little inroads there. The men there are still very 'forward' about 'approaching' women they don't know - at least foreign ones. Though I did get told by an Italian man that a lot more Italian man that a lot more of them are going to Russia et al for foreign brides, because they want a more traditional wife, and Italian women have become a lot more argumentative/nagging and the like.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:49 AM
0

Okay, I just did some (possibly incorrect) math. 40% - 25% - means 15% of their "main breadwinner" statistics are single mothers. But more than 30% of kids are living with single mothers. Is my math wrong, or does that really mean that the majority of single mothers actually get more money from child support or the government than they earn themselves? That's shockingly high, even more than I would've expected.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:45 AM
6

Well, they're also including single mothers in that. More interesting is their statistic that 25% of married women with children out earn their husbands - likely a huge increase from even ten years ago. I look forward to the day when being a househusband is considered a perfectly valid choice for a man (when he's better suited to raising the kids and his wife is better suited to working). It might be soon.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:42 AM
1

Well, as I wrote above, it depends on the circumstances on the said crime. I don't support said logic though (about the child suffering), was merely pointing it out. If a woman conceives illegally, I absolutely think the father shouldn't have to pay child support. Though if rape = no child support, we might suddenly see the appearances of cases of men falsely claiming rape ;)
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:50 AM
1

Well, for me, it really depends on the situation (for both men and women). Depending on the circumstances, for instance, a 25 year-old man who gets a 16 year old pregnant could be guilty of statutory rape, but become a perfectly good father - and, of course, vice versa. A lot of it would be up to the victimized half. For violent rapists, it would, of course, be a very rare situation to leave a child with them.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:43 AM
1

I know Norway has them. I'm not sure about Sweden. I think they actually have other measures that are maybe more win-win - like paternal leave and such so the father can stay home and the mother can work if need be. Don't get me wrong, there's plenty of quotas in europe, but a lot of it comes from the US as well, starting from racial quotas as well.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:33 AM
1

The ultra-PC, we need quotas of women in the boardrooms and the like, comes as much from the US (if not more) than it comes from Europe.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:07 AM
9

Well, I could never support forced abortion, regardless. However, the victim (i.e. father) should be allowed as much participation (or lack thereof) as he wishes - both financially and physically.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:03 AM
33

While this sort of crazy academic women's studies type thinking is, IMHO, pretty amusing, its pretty outdated and fringe, even in feminist theory. It pretty much alienates more than it helps feminists (as, because you've pointed out, it pretty much turns away any woman who has had enjoyable sex, ever). It's the more subtle, and less extreme, versions, that are much more effective for them.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:58 PM
4

As someone who taught for a number of years, I will say this - the majority of my most worst behaved students - I mean the real outliers, a few a year at most - were boys (and almost all from single mother homes). Often very smart, but very ADHD, and constantly wanting attention (good or bad attention). Really, I think they just weren't suited to traditional school - and would've been better off learning some sort of hands-on trade (programming, building, etc.), where they would have thrived. An…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:49 PM
16

The legal "logic" behind it is that the support is for the child, not the mother - so why should the child suffer for the rapist's sin? Perversely, that's the exact same "logic" of hardcore pro-lifers, who are against abortion even in the case of rape - why should the baby/fetus suffer for the rapist's sin. And it gets taken completely differently.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:29 PM
4

More than anything, this has its basis in America's predominantly puritanical attitudes towards nudity. It can really ensnare either gender. This will continue to be a problem with the proliferation of camera phones, etc., if police and judges insist on turning childish playfulness into something perverse.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:23 PM
22

I think that would just look like you are mocking transsexuals (ie people that identify as women) rather than mocking the idea of a "woman's space". If anything, it'll reinforce their ideas in their heads.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:19 PM
21

I can't tell if this is serious or a joke about locker rooms.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:15 PM
2

I don't understand how this is even legal. I guess it's legal on the same grounds that something like "rate my professor/teacher" is legal, but I find them very dodgy as well.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:46 AM
2

I think a large part of the problem is that domestic violence is still entirely viewed as physical damage at this point, and not nearly enough focus on emotional abuse or controlling behaviors and the like.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:47 PM
3

A huge percentage of violent crime in America (especially for minorities) is the result of the drug trade - i.e. gangs fighting over distribution territory/market share, etc. Essentially the mafia during prohibition times ten. Most of those involved in said gangs/trade are men.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:41 PM
2

90% of the time that is men doing comedy for other men. Kids upload themselves falling on the rails on youtube. Hell, that's half the appeal of something like Jackass - which has primarily male fans.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:25 PM
20

I actually do agree that it's an increasing problem that "full time" in the US (in many salaried/office jobs) is now closer to 50-60 hours a week instead of 40. However, I happen to think it's a problem for all people (even men - heck even childless men/women). I guess for her, a father working all the time and not having enough time with his kids isn't really a problem, only for mothers.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:11 PM
8

Well, they pay less now because they visit the doctor less - not only because the necessarily get sick less, but because of the social idea that a man should be able to handle his problems and it's unmanly not to be able to (see also, higher rates of suicide for men). It's one of the reasons men die earlier. So one silver lining might be this encourages men to visit the doctor more rather than just paying less and dying earlier.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 12:12 PM
33

The entire next column was him responding to people telling him it was bad advice (he gives the excuse that he meant for her to lie for 30 mins tops, for conversations sake, still bad advice): http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=15029833
/r/MensRights23/05/13 10:06 AM
1

Of course, I was intending to imply that everyone in prison was a scumbag - more that in the cases where the fathers really are bad characters, its important that the kids end-up with some sort of male role model, rather than none at all.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 12:23 AM
5

Yeah, these seem to be general initiation/entry into manhood ceremonies (that the circumcision is certainly a part of), so it seems to be a total of deaths from circumcision, exposure, etc.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 12:20 AM
0

Well, children need positive male role models. If the child is unlucky enough to have a scumbag for a father, better he rots in prison, and a positive male figure fills that role.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 08:20 PM
5

"Being a man means taking on some sort of responsibility." This I agree with - but it's being a "man" (or woman) versus being a "boy" (or girl) - i.e. becoming an adult means taking responsibilities (at least enough to support yourself to live how you'd like). He's not a "mangina" (whatever that means) - he's a "manchild".
/r/MensRights22/05/13 08:18 PM
5

Yeah, that article was pathetic. So basically, he has a paramilitary fetish and is sad none of his friends are Tom Clancy characters.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 08:15 PM
1

Wow, it sounds like a cool place. I wasn't trying to suggest it would be a problem if it became popular with gays in general, just that the place might have to remain vigilant about the small minority of them who go looking for someone to masturbate with the sauna and the like. It sounds like that's not a problem!
/r/MensRights22/05/13 08:07 PM
2

Am I misreading? If they've been in a relationship for 11 years, wouldn't that mean she's helped raise the kid (since he's been about 5)? That brings it to an entirely different level of creepiness.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:30 PM
6

I dont know, I think a male-oriented spa would have to work hard not to devolve into some sort of gay cruising spot.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:07 PM
15

I second. Spas are predominantly female-clients who mostly want female massage therapists. Head for sports massage (though that can often take more training) - its predominately men. Or move into more physical therapy, which can be very rewarding financially. Or you could try and become an independent massage therapist, just make sure to screen clients to make sure they know they aren't looking for something sexual.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 04:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter