TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coffeeaddicted Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by coffeeaddicted on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Not OP, but it does. I hope that was meant as a rhetorical device in his statement and not a serious opinion. The logic is extremely short sighted and falls apart under any scrutiny.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:01 PM
5

You're dense. If the 18 year old says they chose to do it, then it's fine. If the 40 year old with millions of dollars who has already paid off the 18 year old tries to say "no, totally consented. Ignore them saying otherwise"
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:36 PM
15

So, boys have to work 21* harder, close it down bous, wage gap explained. /S
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:25 PM
3

Depends, physically threatened? Not directly, say you soon around with a 'what the hell' suddenly you're the bad guy and you have to worry about, potentially, many other men. I feel threatened by my lack equal recourse, the lack of social support is seeking said recourse, etc. Not all threats are physical.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:44 PM
2

My thing is, in the version from his POV, he is an abusive asshole treating her as pretty and purposely manipulating here from the moment he offers her a tour forward.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 02:13 PM
63

There have been shame campaigns for 30 years against smokers. Hell, i smoke and i still teach my kids that it's gross. Alcoholism is slightly romanticized at times. However it is also heavily shamed and frowned upon. I can't even walk through a public place with a single open beer without being charged for a crime. They've been pushing for a "sugar tax" on soda and candy for like 8 years. But for some reason saying "being fat wastes tax money, reduces quality of life, and will likely kill you an…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:28 PM
18

It's also perfectly possible to raise your voice without yelling and screaming at someone
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:58 PM
3

It's a slippery slope that has already begun in fire departments and careers with objective physical standards.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 02:26 PM
1

Because then you have a subjective standard to go with. It doesn't matter if men generally interview better because you can SAY that a certain part of the interview is why he didn't get hired. Thus hiding the fact that you hired someone based on their gender despite them being worse for the role objectively.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 07:07 PM
2

How do you mistakenly falsely accuse someone of rape? Like oops, didn't mean to bump into you rapist? Like, how the fuck?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 01:10 AM
2

While I harbour this fear myself, as a father of three girls no one has ever questioned me. Even walking home from a birthday party with her kicking and screaming over my shoulder.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:31 AM
4

Or the bowl of m&ms.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:32 PM
10

Every man who covers his ass and has a family is likely doing it to protect the women he cares about as well as himself. He's doing it so his mother doesn't have to see the news article damning him before charges are filed. For his wife, so she doesn't have to struggle with him as his reputation and career is drug through the mug all while she is being labeled a gender traitor and weak women for being with a man that could do that. He's protecting his sons/daughters/nieces/nephews and any other …
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:30 PM
10

No, not if you're not against them you're with them. More like all it takes for evil to succeed is silence and inaction of good people.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:19 PM
2

Is that an annual number though? Or is your 2.4 percent saying that men make an extra .24 hourly? Because if that is based on annual numbers, well men generally work .ore hours than women.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 02:23 PM
16

Nah bud you're being down voted for making a false equivalency. Guess what? I got an even better analogy for you. Some drunk girl grabs your crotch, and your girlfriend laughs at you. Some drunk guy falls into some drunk girl and her boyfriend beats his ass. The second one (ya know the one with real violence) is obviously worse but at the end of the day, guy in example two did nothing wrong and got beat down, girl in example one DID do something wrong (how do you not understand "keep your hands …
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:04 PM
4

Sometimes things are said or posted in order to foster conversation about a subject and speculate reasons and reactions related to a larger subject. Not everything needs to be "feminism is evil poor poor men" in order to belong part of the topics relevant to this sub. This article for example can offer an opportunity to open conversations about why and how the divide exists. I don't know why I replied this to you. You seem to be on point with it not being limited to legal matters.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:12 PM
11

Well he obviously didn't take classes
/r/MensRights07/10/17 01:36 PM
4

As a father of three girls that brought tears to my eyes a little. Thank you for posting something so beautiful and uplifting here.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 10:49 PM
0

So does the other end of it where you trust no one and keep everyone at a distance because you're not willing to risk being vulnerable because then people can take advantage. There is a healthy middle ground. Skepticism is a must but sometimes you gotta take the risk of falling and let people in. First thing you learn to do riding a skateboard is how to fall, that way you can always get back up.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:53 PM
7

Being married with separate finances would require both parties to be employed. Otherwise, only one person has finances, if you are not a stay at home mom, cause kids are a lot of work on their own, don't manage the budget or assist with the finances in anyway, including grocery shopping or paying bills then yeah the relationship is asymmetrical. However, outside the word of law no one has power over you unless you make the choice to let them. If you have no kids, don't help pay bills, and don't…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:26 PM
15

You're, ridiculous. You realize that it's not uncommon for the woman to be responsible for actually attending to the bills, the budget, and the bank account? That normally it's the man negotiating a budget from the money he works for because the rest of it is used to support the wife and children? Hell, I get to spend 100 dollars a month in the way I choose because the other 95* I don't even see. It hits our account, because the account where my money is deposited has both names on it. And gets …
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:07 PM
1

I thought that was how rape was defined in law. Sort of like how philosophers state "This is the definition of this word I am using" before they begin a critique.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 09:55 PM
13

Just make your own signs. "It's not consent if he's drunk" and put them up next to the other ones. The combination will achieve gender neutrality since the message is then targeted at all people with the addition of the second posters.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 04:40 PM
8

Just make your own signs. "It's not consent if he's drunk" and put them up next to the other ones. The combination will achieve gender neutrality since the message is then targeted at all people with the addition of the second posters.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 04:40 PM
4

Aren't you not supposed to feel "entitled" to anything?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:51 AM
3

Yes, after being awake for days straight with only small naps making scientific history the first thought on his mind should have been "Is this shirt appropriate for television?"
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:32 PM
2

I think we should reiterate the fact that the shirt was made for him by a friend here. He wasn't concerned with fashion, his thought when he put the shirt on days before the interview was probably along the lines of "Comfy? Check. Breathable? Check. Hey and my friend made me this one, maybe it'll bring me some luck. I'm gonna need it to not mess this up. Doing something no one has ever done in, well, ever."
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:27 PM
2

Never heard words like that before. /s We're not here to take down women, or to "empower" anyone. We're here to bring light to the realities of discrimination faced by what is technically a minority group (In the U.S.A. at least and only by a small margin). Once we start saying we're trying to "empower men" we're just gender swapping rhetoric. We can't bring change without awareness that the issues exist in the first place (or acceptance, or both). We're here to show examples and make an effort …
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:23 PM
3

their If you're gonna correct someone at least finish the job.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:38 AM
1

and no woman has ever been APPLAUDED for taking advantage of a drunk male while she was sober?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 01:44 AM
1

Words I myself try to live by.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:39 PM
1

Because making them "just for men" would be discrimination. We'd have to fight all the feminist lobbies right out of the gate.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:07 AM
1

The disposableness of men is a weak argument because in the modern era it's completely irrelevant. Even without women we can "grow" children from stocked (or artificially made) eggs, in artificial wombs. Neither gender is "needed" in order to maintain a populace anymore. In this day and age, at least in the first world, we're all pretty equal in the fact none of us are indispensable.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:25 PM
13

I can't help but chuckle about how what is essentially "slut-shaming" made this girl a hero. But when it's done by someone of the opposite gender it makes us all a hate group.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter