coffeyspoons Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
9	The Fundamental Differences Between Male and Female Attraction. I came here to say this exact thing. Click back on post history, think this guy has a website linked that's even more full of crap.	/r/seduction	24/08/14 09:46 AM
3	When the girl brings up her boyfriend/other guy... You need to clarify pretty much immediately whether this is a monogamous arrangement or an open/poly setup. If it's monogamous, the route forward takes one of two forms. You get with her anyway, and she does the same thing to you and you've just fucked over her boyfriend which I highly doubt you'd appreciate. Also, if she wants to see if you'll push it as a 'test', do you REALLY want that sort of girl? She's giving you the 'thanks but no thanks' signal and you call that one a good attempt. If it…	/r/seduction	03/07/14 11:02 PM
1	Text game Have you considered talking to a girl like she's a human being who you like and want to chat to? Don't force the conversation. If she doesn't reply, leave it - she's a. busy, b. doesn't have a response to what you've said or c. >other<. She hasn't replied, and she will if she wants to. Pushing her ain't going to help. Use exclamation marks if you want to. Just maybe don't use more than three at a time - that's stylistic more than anything else. Reply when you receive the message, and are free to…	/r/seduction	30/05/14 10:31 AM
1	Why does she "not want to hurt me"? Neither did I, and neither did several friends of mine - some of us have changed our perspective over time, some haven't. But the whole cherry being important thing is irrespective. I honestly can't say, given that I don't know the girl, you, or your relationship from both sides. Only she really knows that, and you're the only person in this conversation who can hazard a true guess as to how she feels about it. If I had to take a shot in the dark, I'd say it would be inadvisable to. I'd imagine …	/r/seduction	29/05/14 10:29 PM
1	Is it true that most "stranger" girls you get with seduction methods will never be your girlfriend? Girls that you pick up in a bar/club/party Has it occurred to you that that could be where you're going wrong? Bar, club, party - these are all 'hook-up' locations. As a lady, I have never got more than a night or a few repeat nights out of any of those places - with one exception, but I picked the guy up by telling him he looked like a cat, quoting Plath to him and hugging his leg for a while. MDMA and an unconventional pick up method, but it worked. In terms of 'stranger' girls or guys, those …	/r/seduction	29/05/14 09:27 PM
2	Why does she "not want to hurt me"? Lady here. I'm sorry to read your post, I've been in the situation and acted how A is acting before, and I can tell you that if she says she 'doesn't want to hurt you', she REALLY doesn't want to hurt you. From a female point of view, sex can be a big deal. Speaking from experience, in my early years of sexual activity, I didn't value it in the slightest - mainly because of the less-than-ideal way I lost my virginity. I now look back at that first time, and all of those first encounters and, in …	/r/seduction	29/05/14 09:20 PM
-1	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. because that's what they made men do to succeed with them. /r/TheRedPill is thataway. I am too tired to fully argue with this sort of statement. Some of your points are valid, you can pick and choose which ones you want me to be referring to if you like - long story short, nobody is ever completely innocent. However, I call bullshit on this equal blame thing you have going on above - see my other responses for more coherency and depth, I'm out of this for tonight.	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 11:14 PM
0	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. Speed typing: a curse as well as a blessing.	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 10:35 PM
0	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. I did simplify, you're right on that. Thanks for summarising that, and you're right with your summary - the view of women as delicate creatures who needed to be protected, however, is still something that I [alongside many other feminists] abhor. However, as /u/ZimbaZumba correctly pointed out, it's unrealistic to apply modern perspectives to matters of that time, so you're right in that it is "a far more complex legal and social landscape". No argument against any of what you said in that comme…	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 10:09 PM
-1	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. The last line of your post is pretty much how I'd have replied to that had you not made the point already. Everyone was in the shit during that time except for the bourgeois, luckily now at least it's more equal level in terms of gender balance - so yes, agree with you completely there. It's unrealistic to apply modern perspectives on it, and I shouldn't have done that. I apologise for that particular aspect of my argument and completely take your point on that. edit in response to your edit. ma…	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 09:42 PM
1	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. I haven't, no. Based on the fact I'm a pacifist, I wouldn't enlist in the army - I think the horrors faced by men such as my grandfather are despicable and show the worst side of humanity, and I admire the men who were brave and courageous enough to either choose to fight or were forced to. My grandmother still sleeps with granddad's sword [or whatever the mouldy holder contains aside maggots] under her bed and her face darkens when the war is mentioned, based purely on the stories he brought ba…	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 09:35 PM
0	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. You can guess what you please, if you want a response re. female involvement/lack thereof, you can see my other responses - have linked references, pointed out limitations in legal ability at the time and acknowledged male sacrifice and trauma. All I was originally doing is pointing out that you guys [or your fathers/grandfathers, or whathaveyou] didn't have it that bad in comparison in reference to the original point. I wasn't the one who brought up warfare, if you see above.	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 09:26 PM
0	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. Women were not permitted in the army until 1948 formally except in time of war and abject need - and even then, before the ruling, female participation in combat was restricted or non-existent, with the main exception of Russian forces. The linked act still restricted female participation involving "aircraft and vessels of the Air Force and Navy that might engage in combat". Women didn't have the opportunity, yet still joined up in disguise so that they could fight alongside men.	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 09:22 PM
1	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. Before 1918? Yes, you're right. There was not male universal suffrage. Now? See here. That was the dominant landmark legislation [in the US at any rate] for BOTH genders to have voting rights. After this act, both men and women were given the vote. The specific prohibitions restricting the vote of any given person were NOT gender specific. Not all men had the vote in the past, true. They were, however, always dominant up until this act in terms of gender balance. I'm sorry, but 'butthurt' is sti…	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 09:14 PM
0	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. Accepted and true, but equally...	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 08:31 PM
2	Only 58% of the adult male population was eligible to vote before 1918 in the UK. In 1918 the Representation of the People Act was passed which allowed women over the age of 30 who met a property qualification to vote. Although 8.5 million women met this criteria, it only represented 40 per cent of the total population of women in the UK. it only represented 40 per cent of the total population of women in the UK. AFTER 1918, that is. You think you had it bad before 1918? Jesus. Butthurt or what.	/r/MensRights	24/03/14 06:05 PM