TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coheedcollapse Archive

View 0 posts and 6 comments by coheedcollapse on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sooo you're saying Uh. No? 23% is still probably an interesting statistic for most people, which is why they led with it, plus they were already talking about "minorities" within the homeless population, so it made sense to progress to females. The part that I deemed "too stupid" was spelling out the remainder (men). try to talk to feminists If you're using these talking points, that might be why. I'm not a feminist myself, but I've talked to plenty. They're mostly reasonable folk looking for eq…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:55 AM
3

We've had like four back and forth comments and it's still pretty clear that you haven't actually taken the few moments to go check out the article. It does mention the disadvantages the groups face. It also mentions the number of total homeless in Vancouver, where they can get assistance, and opinions from people who are helping them. You're bringing up a bunch of issues that are completely ancillary to this, and associating some high-level discrimination-wishing to like seven words in a ~700 w…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:40 AM
4

They're reporting the interesting numbers. Most people understand that the majority of homeless are male considering their everyday interactions and observations, so the paper is dropping percentages that people may not know. They likely aren't assuming that their readers are idiots, so the fact that the other percentage of homeless are males is kind of, you know, implied. They don't explicitly have to say "23 percent of homeless are women - that means that the other 77% is men!". I have no idea…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:29 AM
6

But the whole article is about the total homeless population. They didn't "focus" on any minority. The only mention of them were in that single passage in the form of a few factoids. Sometimes stats are just that, stats. Not all writers have a hard-on for discriminating against guys and it certainly seems, at least in this case, that the members of this sub are getting worked up over a tiny fraction of the information available.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:20 PM
29

How is it that you're willing to straight out draw a conclusion about a complete article based on a likely misleading picture taken by a dude obviously trying to push a narrative? Literally took me two seconds to search for the words available in the article to see that it was an overarching story on homelessness in Vancouver, the infographic probably referred to a single passage that mentioned, specifically, what percentage of the homeless population was made up by certain minorities and women.…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:49 PM
39

It's weird to me how certain niche subreddits absolutely love taking shit out of context and getting furious about it. I searched for the words in the article, which returned with this. I assume the infographic is referring to this quote: Aboriginals (38 per cent), people who identify as LGBTQ2+ (13 per cent) and veterans (11 per cent) are over-represented in the homeless population. Women make up 23 per cent of the homeless population. Has no slant suggesting that women are more in need and I s…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter