TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coiled-serpent Archive

View 2 posts and 430 comments by coiled-serpent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

What the fuck? I just did. I explained the historical basis of my opinion. Work on your reading comprehension skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 12:22 PM
-1

Well, my opinions are based on the fact that these societal structures served humanity well for thousands of years. The trend you're advocating for hasn't existed for much time at all, yet it's already having disastrous effects. It's not good for society, it's not good for individuals. We're all suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 11:51 AM
3

maybe if family wouldn't be shackles for the last millenia women would be more relaxed about it If this is actually your worldview, then you're just proving my point. How could you possibly believe this? Want family with women - time to make it comfortable for ALL participants. It is comfortable, most women in the past viewed it as comfortable. It's arguably the ideal situation if your goal is to build/sustain a functional society. You need a functional society to remain comfortable. I think you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 11:16 AM
5

He doesn't see me, he want's me for something. They still want you for something. Sadly, their motivations are probably even more shallow. What would a man who cares about your career want from you? Your money and sex? When men aren't interested in a woman's career, it's typically because they want to build a family with them. That's their ultimate goal. I'm sure that you, and many women, feel repulsed by this. You've been the subject of relentless psyops, and now involuntarily associate the con…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 10:05 AM
2

I think it's an oversimplification. Humans are complex creatures, we can be psychologically influenced and controlled. Women are able to dominate men without using physical force, I'm sure you've personally witnessed this phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:40 PM
2

I think the Iranian revolution of 1979 is close to the scenario. Then surely you must understand the point I was making? The Iranian Revolution would not have succeeded, or even occurred, if the Iranians weren't possessed by religious doctrine and ideals. You can't just overlook psychological influence/control. It's not outright physical force; however, it's arguably more effective at subjugating individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:25 PM
10

Exactly, the point is that not all men would be on board with this, especially not men who women have influence over (which is the majority of men). If we're allowing unrealistic hypotheticals, one could argue "what if every woman in the United States made a secret pact to stab/shoot men in the back, at the same exact time, ideally while they were asleep?"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:21 AM
13

The core argument might be true. Men are the enforcers and granters of rights, because they have a monopoly on force. Even with the advent of firearms, men are able to restrict women's rights when they want to. We saw it occur in Iran during/after the 1979 revolution. I think it ignores a lot of nuance, though. Physical force isn't the only form of force available. Men want to be with women, they want to be loved by women. This gives women leverage over men. You might argue that this doesn't mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 02:12 AM
1

Why would those two things be classified under the same label? “Coercion” implies force or threats were involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:50 PM
0

Is this satire? Of course it is shameful to fuck people for money. Prostitutes should be shamed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:29 AM
0

I think they're grouped together because the end result is the same I don't really agree with the claim that the result is the same, but we don't need to argue about that. I can understand how categorizing these things together would be beneficial from the perspective of the victim. If someone believes they've been raped and/or feels like they did not give consent, then we should acknowledge that. However, if we're categorizing these situations to criminally charge or label the accused, then the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:26 AM
5

In fact specifically focusing on violent sex offences has been used for centuries to dismiss other types of non consensual sex as not "real" and a tactic often employed by rapists and those defending rapists. I think we've gone too far in the opposite direction. We group together situations that aren't even remotely comparable. It's not really a tactic of dismissal, it's just an important distinction to make. For example, I don't think we can reasonably compare two people having drunken sex with…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 08:59 AM
–

Yes, I assumed you were a woman because of your profile picture. Also because you said you were dating a man. Most people dating men are women. You should put the Mars symbol at the start of your tag, the mobile app cuts it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 08:16 AM
–

Did you not read my comment? Stop and consider how ridiculous their story is. You think a man would implement a multi-step plan where they shower a person with love, then gradually begin abusing them over the course of three months? All of this, just because they enjoy abuse? Really? I'm sure sociopaths like that exist, but these situations are rarely that simple. There's almost never a clearly defined "good vs evil" narrative in real life, particularly not in relationships. Yet, that's what the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 07:38 AM
–

That's right! You agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 07:30 AM
–

The story they're telling is just unrealistic. You really think their ex boyfriend had a multi-month long master plan where he showered them with love and then gradually transitioned into abuse? For what, exactly? The ability to abuse someone? I'm sure sociopaths like that exist, but there aren't a ton of them. People have a psychological incentive to convince themselves that they were abused when their relationship ends. It helps preserve their self-esteem and provides them with a clear narrati…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 07:30 AM
-2

Is that what your ex did? He punched you? I thought he was “verbally abusive”. It’s pretty clear to me that your ex was nice and affectionate at the start of your relationship because he genuinely felt those feelings. A few months into the relationship, you started arguing more (much of which was probably instigated by you). This is not abuse, it’s a normal relationship You’re trying to retcon your relationship into an abusive one. You’re acting like your ex boyfriend had a long-term plan in pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 12:10 PM
2

Wow, you just proved my point. Thank you for your help.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 11:32 AM
2

love bomb It's difficult to take you seriously when you use terms like this. This concept is just silly, it exclusively exists because women desperately want to believe that they were abused by their exes. We've reached the point where a woman can claim that any relationship was abusive, even ones that were good. "My boyfriend was super nice and affectionate?! OMG, I was totally love bombed! I'm a victim of abuse!"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 10:47 AM
2

I still think it's a grift. I'd rather just read about the "tools" CBT provides and implement them myself. What have you learned? Give me an example of something.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 10:52 AM
3

Yes, talk therapy is a grift that caters to the self-obsessed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 08:13 AM
0

once had a guy who did different kinds of unexpected jobs, that was interesting and impressive Was he a handyman?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 07:42 AM
–

Well, it sounds like we agree with each other. You enjoy dressing a specific way because it improves other peoples' perception of you and provides you with an ego boost. I think you're being honest with yourself, but a lot of women aren't. They claim that they exclusively wear make-up "for themselves" but can never articulate what that actually means. Of course it is to improve the perception other people have of them. I doubt they dress themselves up to look in the mirror and masturbate like Na…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:45 PM
–

Why does it make you feel good about yourself? Surely it's not exclusively because it makes you feel "put together". People generally don't wear any of this when they are lounging around at home. I often hear women discuss how much they enjoy taking off their bra and tight pants after a long day.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:19 PM
–

when women dress up or dress revealing men genuinely believe in their heart of hearts that women do it for attention instead of themselves What the hell does "they do it for themselves" even mean? Why would dressing sexy make them feel good about themselves? It's because it affects how others perceive them, obviously. They want to be perceived as attractive and of high status by men and other women. Imagine arguing that a short guy wears lifts "for himself". It's completely meaningless. He's doi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 10:32 PM
1

I always made it clear to them that I was not interested in dating. Regardless, they should have been able to ascertain that. If I rarely respond to your texts and only ever agree to hangout with you when you text me at 12 AM on a random Saturday, does it seem like I want to date you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:41 AM
2

Oh no, the woman who tried using sex to make me commit is throwing a temper tantrum because I didn't give her what she wants. Holy shit, the consequences of arrested development.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 12:55 PM
2

Ok, I don't struggle to date at all. Your point is nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 12:07 PM
5

I’m not interested in a man who deliberately ignores what I have to say The women who express the most interest in me are women who I show little to no interest in. My disinterest is genuine, these are not women I want to date. I used to occasionally have sex with women like this, but I stopped. It's just not worth it. It always ended poorly, usually with them freaking out at me and making me feel like a horrible person. You guys clearly think that men should get a bunch of women by merely exist…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 12:05 PM
3

In her reply to this comment, she says that she wants more than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 11:50 AM
3

It's not a "power play". Is that how you perceive it? You get offended when men you like don't put in enough effort to woo you, and assume that they are playing mind games?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 11:07 AM
6

I don't think I've ever sent an opening message on Hinge. I have answered the multiple choice questions, though. I genuinely do not see the point. If I had to talk my way into a date with a woman, I don't think it'd pan out into a good relationship at all. Do you have to constantly come up new "opening lines" to keep her entertained?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 11:01 AM
17

What are you expecting them to do? Woo you? Bring you flowers? Sing a song and do a little dance? Either you're interested in someone or you aren't. I doubt them "putting [in] effort" even makes a difference. If you don't like a man, then I bet you're annoyed and offended by the attention he gives you. Meanwhile, if you have genuine interest in a man, then you probably get butterflies in your stomach when he barely even acknowledges you. You'll be checking your phone all day, waiting for a reply…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 10:53 AM
29

What even is your argument? That men are limiting their dating pool by not reading biographies on Hinge?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 10:24 AM
1

Are you a burden on the people around you? If not, then you have value.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 08:35 AM
2

The only tangible "value" an individual has is their economic impact on society. All other forms of "value" cannot be measured and are unfalsifiable. So if you're not a burden on society, then you have positive value.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 08:03 AM
–

I get the impression that you aren't being honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 11:52 AM
–

Why wouldn't it matter? You're still conceited and irrational.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 11:46 AM
1

It's conceited and irrational, that's 1 out of 1000 men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 11:40 AM
9

A lot of women want to find a partner, but have standards that filter out over 99% of men. So they end up endlessly fucking and dating guys who do not want to commit to them. These are my standards that I could think of that are rational Google "Female Delusion Calculator" and take the short quiz. You'll see how "rational" your standards truly are.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 11:21 AM
–

I don't think it's helpful to tell kids that they are autistic and your post perfectly emphasizes why. You started to behave and think in a detrimental way as a result of your diagnosis, even though the diagnosis doesn't actually represent anything real. Mental disorders are societal inventions, that's all they are. At most, they are labels for traits and behaviors. So what even was the point? Why did your family/doctors do this to you? None of the behaviors you exhibited as a kid even sound abn…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 10:20 AM
0

Did you not read the part where she said "more popular than me"? Clearly she's aware of the fact that popularity mattered a lot. High school boys are basically competing with each-other to see who can get into a girl's pants. So if Jane is popular and all the boys want to conquer her, they might overlook Jackie, even if Jackie is more attractive than Jane. No, I don't agree that this is true throughout life. It's not even remotely true to the same degree. I'm not in a 24/7 dick-measuring contest…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 08:14 AM
-2

There's a reality distortion field in high school where the popular people seem attractive, even if they objectively aren't. It's possible that you were better looking than a lot of the popular girls and your boyfriend just wasn't affected by the psyop.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 06:03 AM
–

Did they believe that women were inferior across the board? Or that women were better-suited, possibly even superior, at specific things? Were men believed to be inferior at anything? If the answer is yes, then why don't you consider men to be oppressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 12:16 PM
–

I think it goes beyond physical strength. Also, it's your own opinion that women were "oppressed". What does that even mean? Partnering up is mutually beneficial for both the man and the woman. The man focuses on the acquisition of resources, protection, etc. The woman focuses on raising their children, domestic tasks (the specifics of which would depend on time/place), etc. How is that oppression? For most people, it's the ideal situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:20 AM
0

Why would that matter? Computing has exponentially advanced since the 70s, I'd argue the most dramatic advancements have occurred in the past 20 years. Even today, women do not enter the field at the same rates as men. It's not even close. Another thing to consider is the fact that workers in tech, and STEM in general, are younger than the overall workforce. Roughly 44% of software developers are under 30! What systemic advantages would a man born in 1995 have over a woman born in the same year?…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 07:46 AM
0

You chose examples that aren’t even historically accurate. I bet you saw a BuzzFeed-style list titled ”Feminist QUEENS Who Slayed in Tech #PussyPower” and believed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:45 PM
0

Nobody is idolizing the middle ages. I was refuting her claim. Work on your reading comprehension skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:19 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:19 PM
1

society has moved forward in leaps and bounds Advancements in science and technology would've happened regardless, it was already happening before 1945.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:16 PM
1

I'd just have other slaves taste my food before I eat it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:14 PM
0

Because I'm already in the top percent of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:13 PM
-1

nursing, and elder-work There will be an oversupply of nurses within the next few decades as boomers drop like flies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:59 PM
1

This. Female dominated fields are less affected by AI No, not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:58 PM
-1

Lovelace contributed important, meaningful work to utilize it She really didn't. Babbage wrote the first programs for his hypothetical machines, so her being credited as the "first programmer" is just entirely inaccurate. It’s silly to say “women invented computing!” because it’s an overstatement, but it’s equally silly to say “men invented computing!” Ok, sure, computing wasn't 100% pioneered by men. Over 90% of the most significant contributions were made by men, though. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:44 PM
0

Crispr wouldn't exist without a woman. Ok. Women who are driving AI forward: Fei Fei Li, Daphne Koller, and Hua Wu. Most of these women have not made significant contributions. Fei-Fei Li has, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:38 PM
-1

Fathers are not giving away their daughters to some loser who needs affection. They have clear income requirements. Okay? What does this have to do with anything? Regardless, I don't think it's true. I know that unmarried women who are over 30ish years old are heavily shunned in a lot of those countries. Once the daughter reaches a certain age, the father will be grateful if anyone wants to marry her. Similarly, the average man back then faced an early death through hard labour and being sent to…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 01:42 PM
-4

Wrong. The average man today might have more sexual encounters with random women, but they're struggling to start and maintain long-term relationships. Young men cannot find wives, yet the vast majority of men in the middle ages were married. So how exactly do men have "better access" today? Our current predicament is horrible and unsustainable. Having sex with random people is downright harmful. It's not good for women, it's not good for men, it's not good for anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 12:37 PM
-2

Men's bodies will always have utility... Women's do as well, just for a different type of "labor". Also, I doubt Musk would even be interested. Tons of women would have the same plan, so he could be extremely picky.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 12:14 PM
-2

The irony is that OP is ranting on the internet, which he would not be able to do without women’s contributions to computing and STEM technology. See the factual information about Ada Lovelace’s and Hedy Lamar. I hate to break it to you, but this is factually inaccurate. Lovelace didn't conceptualize, design or build the analytical engine. Babbage did. So your primary example isn't even real, you're falsely attributing the work of a man to a woman. What exactly do you think Hedy Lamar invented? …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 12:10 PM
0

You don't get it bro. What you call "stress" is them performing emotional labor. Ok? When your girlfriend harasses you over nonsense, she's actually providing you with an unpaid service. It's invisible labor. Why don't you start paying her when she nags you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:59 AM
-4

With me leading everything, primarily strategizing and fraternizing with other men. Women would either be my concubines or servants. I suppose they could also be priestesses. This is how humanity functioned for thousands of years, it worked well. We flipped the system onto its head 50 years ago, and everything has gone to shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:55 AM
-5

It will happen. Bullshit white-collar jobs have been disappearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:49 AM
1

It's mensch
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:36 AM
-1

Lenin was financially supported by his mother and wife. He was such a loser, just a complete disgrace. The more you learn about this guy, the more pathetic he gets. Your failure to understand how the middle classes joining with the proletariat being a cornerstone of Marxist theory is strange. They united the peons and the mostly unproductive middle class against the most productive members of their society. It worked out great. It's fucking stupid. Lenin's dad was a government official and his f…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 11:09 AM
0

Generally speaking, Lenin was supported by upper-class "intellectuals" like himself. Over-educated, privileged buffoons who contributed little to society. They enjoyed LARPing as oppressed peons, but the vast majority of the actual peasantry did not give a shit about their dumb movement. Stalin stood out amongst the Bolshevik leaders because he was actually from the gutter. Most of them were wimpy liberal elite nerds, that's why they got their shit pushed in by Uncle Joe
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 10:01 AM
1

She writes incoherent nonsense, then tells you to "keep up". What am I supposed to keep up with?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 11:51 AM
9

Well, we know that Slavic women aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 08:14 AM
1

I think a woman from a developing country would love to live in a spacious, clean home with a beautiful kitchen and various other luxuries, all paid for by their husband. I think most of them to would love to be able to cook for a few hours every day and not have to worry about their own survival in a squalid environment. Am I going crazy here? You're acting like the average woman living in a "third world" country would be completely opposed to the idea of cooking and cleaning in exchange for as…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 08:11 AM
6

I think the women there are generally attracted to a lot of them. Like a 5’11 dude who’d get filtered out on Hinge over here would probably stand out quite a lot in Asia Also, “undeveloped”? What the fuck are you talking about. These are 1st world countries. I’ve never heard of someone going to Somalia to passport bro it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 07:52 AM
4

What are you talking about? Women who consider themselves to be “traditional” generally want traditional men. They make videos complaining about how they can’t find masculine, strong men who are able to be providers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 07:51 AM
-5

Would you say it’s transactional for an “average” looking white dude? Maybe a 5’11 guy who’s not ugly but not handsome. I was under the impression that many of the women are genuinely attracted to guys like this. In America, they’d struggle to match with women on dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 07:42 AM
1

lol, based on nothing but your feelings that women being poweless servant makes your life better No, it's not based on nothing. Like seriously, what’s your evidence that men in traditional patriarchal societies ever listen to women at all? Haha. Women were the driving force behind the Temperance (anti-alcohol) movement. Men took their moral authority so seriously that they prohibited alcohol via the 18th Amendment. What you actually mean is that you’re much happier when you don’t have to actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 12:21 AM
1

Okay, then how do you explain so many completely unconnected societies ending up as patriarchal? It goes beyond that as well, gender roles are similar. The vast majority of human societies were set-up like this, regardless of the location or time period. Obviously you can point to a few exceptions, but they don't disprove my point. The vast majority of societies had gender roles where men focused on the acquisition of resources while women focused on growing and caring for their children. These …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:51 PM
0

It is, in fact, an excellent argument. No it's not, it's a horrible argument because it is meaningless. She's describing her feelings, not reasons. She didn't offer a rational or moral justification. She could have said "I like being a scientist and believe society benefits when we let everyone contribute to the sciences". Instead of making a real argument, she just told me her personal desires. It makes her appear very egocentric.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 08:12 PM
1

What fight do you think happened? Small protests containing a few thousand women out of millions? Who cares. Really think about how many women there were actually protesting this, standing outside the White House with signs. Nobody gave a shit about it. There wasn’t ANY meaningful change until progressive political parties realized that they’d benefit from the female vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 07:42 PM
1

They didn’t “lose that battle” because there really wasn’t a battle. The vast majority of women did not give a shit about suffrage. The few thousand suffragettes protesting throughout the country weren’t putting much pressure on the government at all. Women were given the right to vote because specific politicians and political parties wanted to cater to them. They thought it’d help them win more votes. That’s really it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 06:10 PM
1

No, they really weren’t. The vast majority of women did not care about suffrage at all, I’m not sure what percentage were overtly opposed to it. So is your argument that the majority of women were fools back then?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 06:03 PM
1

You just completely avoided the question, this comment is nonsense. Are you not aware that 7% of your income, regardless of how much you make, goes directly to Social Security and Medicare? Really it’s more like 15%; however, employers pay half. So it’s not a situation where people have to be paying these taxes no matter what. That is just a silly argument. If Social Security and Medicare were axed, there’d be no reason to pay 7-15% of your income. How do you not know this? Have you ever earned …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 06:01 PM
1

I had a paper route when I was 12, so I was working 7-8 hours a week to pay for my LEGOs. The explanation you provided is just kind of sad. They want to revert back to being children now that they have disposable income?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 05:55 PM
-1

I doubt you value freedom. I certainly do not value freedom. Do you support welfare programs? Or do you apply your “values” consistently? If you support the coercion of individuals to pay for the lives of others, then you must not value their freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:31 AM
-5

There’s no condescension, stop projecting. What I describe in the first few paragraphs was one of the main arguments made by women who were against suffrage. They believed that they held a moral high ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:19 AM
-4

Maybe use your big science brain to make a real argument against any of my points then. I’m not impressed. All you’ve said is that you’re glad that you don’t have to live in a traditional society. That’s it. Your only argument is “I like being a scientist”. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:14 AM
-8

Yes, of course I do. I think men in traditional, patriarchal societies find input from women more valuable. When women are completely absent from politics, then they don't have much of a political agenda. Men take insight from their wives, sisters, mothers, grandmothers, etc more seriously when they aren't politically compromised. this role is given to women as a consolation prize for biological inferiority Or it's given to women because they're better suited for it? You sort of acknowledged tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 08:28 AM
1

Wow, these were my hobbies when I was like, 12. I had a massive collection of LEGO Star Wars sets and minifigs, thousands of dollars spent. Then I gradually lost interest throughout high school and gave everything away for free. What does your boyfriend even do with his LEGOs? I doubt he plays with them like a child. Does he create MOCs? That's what I used to do, I was active in online communities for it. Most of the people I'd talk to online were also kids, at least I thought they were... Now I…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 06:22 AM
–

You just can’t help yourself, impulsively telling these silly lies. I see through your facade. It’s okay, little one. Nobody cares that you wear make-up. There’s no need to lie. You’re safe here, I promise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 01:13 PM
–

You're either lying or you've deluded yourself into believing that it doesn't count as wearing make-up if you retain a "natural" look. I'd wager it's the latter. EDIT: Or you're an Amish woman
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:40 PM
2

I don't think this is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 10:55 AM
14

Why do women wear make-up? Why do they get the vast majority of cosmetic surgeries (>90%)? It's because they're competing for male attention, obviously. Just like men are competing for female attention. Your little theory makes zero sense. Women invest more time, money and effort into their appearances than men do. This is just a fact. Men are slightly more active than women, but that's it. I would imagine that this discrepancy is a result of men performing more physical labor. It could also be …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 09:55 AM
11

Also, women apply lotions, serums and other shit to their faces now that has a make-up like effect, but they don't call it make-up. It's "skincare". I'm not even sure if it falls under the cosmetics industry, but a lot of it should.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 09:37 AM
0

I don't wear makeup I don't believe you. At minimum, you're probably wearing something that partially functions as make-up, even though it's not advertised as make-up. Tinted moisturizer, serums that make your skin glow, etc. So many "skincare" products for women are designed to provide minor cosmetic enhancements.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 09:29 AM
2

Why don’t you two get a room?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 06:16 PM
1

I personally believe that women have a natural inclination to encourage violence in men. We see this all the time in the animal kingdom, a female will broadcast a ”come and get it” message, then watch as males rip each other to shreds over her. Human females still feel this urge, they want to elicit violent responses out of men. It just manifests differently now that we’re civilized. They subconsciously want their male partners to display strength, dominance and brutality, so they provoke them. …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 11:02 AM
–

You don’t get it. The point is that accidental harm would be much more common… Obviously if your intention is to kill you would use a weapon. If a woman is punching her husband in the face, he probably won’t end up seriously injured. If he retaliated with a single punch, she might end up maimed or even dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 10:50 AM
–

Imagine what the numbers on husbands being maimed/killed by their wives would be if women had the strength of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 10:32 AM
1

It's like asking you: when did you stop beating your wife? Oh yeah, why so defensive? Are you really unable to see the difference? Your analogy entails an accusation. It would only make sense if the question asked was "when did you stop being a slut?"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:51 AM
4

You contradict yourself in this comment. You don't care about it, but simultaneously "don't want a hoe"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:26 AM
-3

Not trying to say that you're wrong for being angered at how men are still required to serve, but is that women's fault? It's not entirely the fault of women; however, they have political power now. Maybe nobody should serve, and your country should rely on a professional army instead? Maybe we should all just resolve disputes with sex like bonobos. Wouldn't that be amazing? All world leaders and armies should just had sex with eachother! This is a fantasy, it's silly. It's also completely impra…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 07:26 AM
-2

i’m not expected to woo anyone for months Yes you are. Wtf are you even talking about? The entire process of dating is a prolonged wooing. The average couple dates for 2-3 years before they get engaged. Sure, the barrier to entry for sex has been lowered. But who gives a fuck about that? You're not going to start a family immediately after a drunken one-night stand, unless you're a moron who nuts inside of random women. nobody will bat an eye if i’m not sole provider or even a primary breadwinne…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 07:07 AM
–

Just piss it out. You haven't realized that it comes out when you pee?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 06:50 AM
–

Right? Wtf did I just read. He's having gay sex as a form of stigma management, hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 06:48 AM
–

I wish they consciously understood that males are superior. I think they already subconsciously understand this, because they constantly complain about men and male privilege. Women need to make peace with the fact that it's better to be a man and stop fighting their own nature. Men are clearly superior from a biological standpoint. We are taller, stronger, more robust. I don't bleed out of my penis once a month. I will never get pregnant, which is great. Women are at a biological disadvantage a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 05:53 AM
–

First because defining Autism levels by conflating them with Autistic disorder levels is a mistake: autism and ASD are linked but those are not the same thing Well, this is hysterical. ASD stands for "Autism Spectrum Disorder", dude. It's an abbreviation. Both terms refer to the same disorder. Everyone diagnosed with "Autism" is assigned one of the severity levels, unless their clinician is just making shit up and not following the DSM-5. And if you think even low support autistic people don't b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 09:02 AM
–

Every label is artificial, doesn't mean they don't represent reality Conceptual categories are artificial. Labels that point directly towards natural phenomena are not artificial. Evidence shows the autistic brain is different, better at some things and worse at other things No it doesn't, this is pop-science bullshit. Most mental disorder brain-imaging studies are, Autism would be classified as a disease if it was due to physical abnormalities. Also, if the autistic brain is reliably shown to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 07:48 AM
–

You clearly do not understand me. Most brains are like this But some brains are like that Prove it. Labels are imaginary but so is every concept ever, doesn't mean they aren't useful. Wrong, you're just unfamiliar with the philosophy of science. Do you know what a natural kind is? You could say a "chair" is an imaginary label. It's just wood shaped a certain way. It's an artificial construct. Still a useful label. Yes, "chair" is a construct. It is a conceptual category. Humans find categories l…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 07:33 AM
–

None of the claims you're making are backed by evidence. Experiences are subjective, it's impossible to objectively analyze any of this. Most "autistic" experiences are just normal human experiences with a different label. The label itself is artificial.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 10:32 PM
–

having a diseased brain I wouldn't even give them that, the reality is that most of these people are normal. There's nothing physically abnormal about them or their brains, they just meet the diagnostic criteria for a classification that has become increasingly meaningless in recent years. It didn't even have significant meaning when it was invented, so now it's essentially just useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 10:26 PM
–

What even is neurodivergence? It’s an artificial construct, so is every other psychiatric label.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 10:20 PM
4

It's sad to see a 38 year old man who thinks autism is a personality trait... Why the hell is "kid" even in your username? Also, you should stop talking about therapy and trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:56 AM
–

Is there something wrong with you? If 20% of women were willing to go along with it, humanity would survive. Hell, the minimum viable population is like 10,000 people. Humanity wouldn't even go extinct if a mere 0.00001% of women were ok with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:47 AM
–

Do you think humanity vanishing and an empire crumbling are the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:27 AM
–

women refuse to submit and suizide = humanity vanishes The majority of women would not commit suicide. Let's assume that 80% of women did, though. Well, the remaining 20% probably believe that men should be in charge, maybe they liked to watch TRAD-wife TikToks before men took their rights away. They're going to teach their ideology to their daughters, so the next generation would probably believe in the system even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:10 AM
–

Think about how many women were actively protesting as well, there were hardly any at all. Probably only a few thousand throughout the entire United States, possibly even less. The idea that 20 women standing outside of the White House with signs "forced changed" is a complete fantasy. It's delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:06 AM
–

I highly doubt this was the reason, it just doesn't make sense. Correct, it's a complete fantasy to think that picketing and "civil disobedience" pushed any meaningful change. Lawsuits possibly, as they would set legal precedents.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:02 AM
–

Are you joking? Of course widespread support matters. You realize that the MAJORITY of Americans supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964... Right? Also, the scale of these protests were astronomical. For example, 250,000 people were at the March of Washington alone. This was an issue that a ton of Americans cared about, once again, the majority of people supported the Civil Rights Act. I don't think you realize how small the original suffragette movements were. Hardly anyone gave a shit about it,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 09:33 AM
–

This is completely false. It is a fantasy. There wasn't much pressure put onto Western governments at all. The vast majority of people, including the vast majority of women, did not give a shit about the suffragette movement. Do you have any idea how many women were active, protesting suffragettes? Not many. If you genuinely believe that a few thousand women standing outside with signs could cause "immense political pressure", then I'm sorry, but you're just believing in fairy tales.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 08:49 AM
–

The concept of human rights are deeply rooted in philosophy and widely considered innate. What are you even talking about? Natural rights? Be more specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 08:44 AM
–

The baseline is nobody having any rights at all. How could you possibly think otherwise? This is absurd, rights are a CONCEPT. They are not an entity, they do not exist outside of your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 08:37 AM
–

Rights are an abstract concept, they aren't real. Your rights only matter if other people respect and enforce them. men are the only reason women have a threat to their rights The "threat" is them deciding not to sacrifice their own self-interests to serve a made-up ideal. That's all rights are, they are ideas that possess the minds of individuals. Similarly, a person can decide that their religion does not matter to them and refuse to participate in its customs. This poses a "threat" to the rel…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 08:33 AM
9

So your argument is that when men reject women, they string them along? I disagree with the premise, I'd argue that women do this more often than men do. There are a lot of women who take advantage of men who are interested in them, using them for favors (especially financial favors). It's such a common occurrence that "simp" is a very popular term.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 08:18 AM
12

What the hell are you talking about? Most prostitutes are destitute, they do not have more financial stability. It's not a good or reliable way to make money at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 05:58 AM
3

Yes, sex definitely is an important piece of the puzzle, but really it's about connecting with a person on a deep level. This might be a bit too philosophical, but I think it is so meaningful because you're transcending your own individuality, even if only for a moment. When you leave your mother's womb, you're alone. It's not a bad thing, it's necessary for you to exist as an individual. It's lonely, though. So when you're having sex with someone you share a deep connection with, you're syncing…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:40 AM
1

How much can you really learn about a person in a few hours? You'd barely be scratching the surface
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:24 AM
5

I sort of agree with you, but disagree with the conclusion you've drawn. It's not really about sex, it's about them never experiencing what it's like to have a deep, almost spiritual, connection with another individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 07:33 AM
3

This is just factually inaccurate. Did you research this at all? Take a look at this review of 62 studies. There is increasing evidence to suggest that women commit as much or more IPV as men... data also suggests that females who perpetrate IPV may experience more violent or frequent IPV victimization
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:36 PM
4

And usually "most affected" is evaluated by the statistical (quantity) means. Well, statistics show that women are more likely to perpetuate intimate partner violence than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 06:56 PM
11

Yeah, from men. Are you sure? I've primarily heard it from women. From a quick google search, I see reddit posts written by women and a myriad of videos (podcast clips, street interviews, tiktoks, etc) where women express this. I do see some videos from the usual "alpha male" guys, they're basically just saying that men shouldn't cry. Nearly everyone discussing the ick factor is a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:27 AM
6

Similar to how people say gender when they mean sex. Is that what they mean? To many people, gender and sex mean the same thing. You're projecting your own ideology onto them. Like, instead of screeching at full volume - you do it with a reduced volume. Is this what we're talking about? Guys having a meltdown where they're screeching and shitting themselves? What are they, autistic? Just say what you actually mean. Women do not want their male partners to cry in-front of them. Women do not want …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:19 AM
6

Have you ever heard women claim that they get the "ick" when their boyfriends/husbands cry in-front of them or show any vulnerability at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 08:48 AM
7

Women are statistically more likely to perpetuate violence against their partner. Do you understand that? They physically abuse their partners at higher rates than men do. The outcomes you mention are often the result of a mutual escalation of violence that, in many cases, was initiated by the woman. It just ends poorly for them more often because they're at a massive physical disadvantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 08:45 AM
8

Then they wouldn't be "showing" their emotions. They'd be describing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 08:36 AM
4

Do you disagree?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 08:30 AM
7

"It's all in my head, just gotta pull through and/or compensate". It is all in your head. If someone is neurotic and insecure, the solution is for them to stop thinking about their anxieties and negative emotions. Do you think that it's helpful to dwell on these thoughts? It's not. The entire reason they have these problems is because they think too much. Hence why "insecure" is always thrown at men in an accusatory tone and always comes with a silent "for no reason" attached... their insecuriti…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 08:25 AM
3

You are correct. The concept of a "class war" is silly and appeals to the lowest common denominator. The upper classes don't generate wealth by stealing from poor people, they do it through the generation of value. The value they generate benefits the entirety of society, so lower classes receive a boost as well. The average person in the United States has more wealth than the vast majority of people who have ever lived. They have more wealth than the average person alive today! Yet they refuse …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 07:44 AM
0

it's especially hitting young men because they're the most vulnerable group to the social costs of these changes No it's not. Men are gaining jobs, over a million women were laid off in a single month during the pandemic and those jobs have hardly even recovered.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 07:37 AM
1

They already do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 07:32 AM
8

Yes, and I just explained the flaw in your logic. Do you need me to dumb it down for you a bit more?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:30 AM
8

Jesus christ. Did you not see that I highlighted a specific part of your comment? Get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:23 AM
10

I do. You're the one who is confused. If you are spending time with a person because you enjoy spending time with them, you are being genuine. If you think that isn't genuine, then WHAT THE FUCK IS?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:20 AM
10

Do you not know what genuine means?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:14 AM
13

First of all, they use each other to escape being alone. They use each other to try and suppress the feeling of loneliness that they feel. What does this have to do with whether or not a relationship is genuine? It feels good to be intimate with another person, both partners sincerely enjoy it. That means that it is genuine. Your argument is just nonsense. Imagine if you told me that you like candy, and in response I said "you don't genuinely like candy, you just evolved to like the taste of sug…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 08:09 AM
1

Women back then were given to men they didn't choose by their fathers This wasn't very common outside of the upper classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 09:38 AM
2

dad who changes nappies... an asshole who spends his days at the gym You seem to be unaware of the fact that men also undergo hormonal changes before and after the birth of a child. Their testosterone drops and estrogen increases to help them care for the newborn. I believe things start to become normal again as the child ages.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 09:36 AM
3

If a woman cares about her children at all, one of the worst things she can possibly do is replace their biological father with a strange, unrelated man. How the fuck could you possibly think that this is a positive thing? You've never heard of the Cinderella effect? Not only that, but it's also just cruel to deprive children of access to their biological father. This post is absurd. I'm shocked that a woman would be the one arguing that "it's good for women with children to divorce their husban…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 09:29 AM
-2

Your primary problem isn't autism, it's your self-defeating attitude. For example: we are unable to automatically socially conform and naturally understand how to navigate dating/romantic relationships What the hell does it matter if you're unable to "automatically" or "naturally" do something? You clearly have awareness of these shortcomings, which implies that you have the capacity to fix them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 12:27 AM
3

Most of their "wild" stories will just involve women acting extremely deranged after they had sex once.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:11 AM
–

No, the analysis excludes single mothers: I exclude the individuals who are not married but are living with others, because these individuals might be separated or divorced single parents who may have a tighter budget and credit constraints... Women are more likely to receive custody of their children. If they were excluded, but men paying child support were not excluded, that'd imply that the gaps between men and women are even larger.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 10:02 PM
2

What are you talking about? Nothing I said is incorrect, single women have more delinquencies than single men. My source is the Federal Reserve. Are you talking about women in general or single women? This conversation is regarding single women, not married women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 09:45 AM
0

You could even start a business. Even if it's unsuccessful, doesn't really matter. Just do something. A lot of women like to cook. I bet a meal delivery service targeted at lonely, working men would kill it. Brand it as "Meals from Mommy" or something like that. Include a handwritten lunch note in each bag, e.g. "I hope my big man has a great day at work! Mommy loves you xoxo" Is this not genius? I would cry tears of joy reading that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 07:35 AM
-2

Single women have higher installment loan balances, higher credit utilization, more delinquencies, more bankruptcies, lower credit scores and significantly less wealth than single men. The claim that they're more responsible consumers is just factually inaccurate, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 06:41 AM
-1

But yeah sitting in a chair typing 40hrs a week is more work than waiting at home twiddling ur thumbs 40hrs a week. If you have a ton of free time, and exclusively spend it twiddling your thumbs, that is your own fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 06:29 AM
1

So why are you mad that I won't procreate? I don't care about whether or not you procreate. This is a public forum that revolves around the debate of beliefs, and I disagree with yours. I don't understand why you'd even ask me this question. Do you engage in these discussions to challenge your beliefs and debate? Or do you just want everyone to agree with and validate you? Why would I bring anyone intentionally into a hostile, unfair world? Because when you create new life, you revolt against th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 06:08 AM
1

I agree with most of what you’re saying, I would not want to live in Afghanistan.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:39 AM
0

It's a problem that resolves itself over time thanks to the carbon cycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:44 PM
3

What the fuck are you talking about? I don't abuse women or other vulnerable populations. Maybe if you were able to form coherent arguments, you wouldn't need to derail conversations like this. Alternatively, you could just admit that you were wrong. You brought up children... Are you not aware of the fact that the majority of perpetrators in child abuse cases are female? You might argue that this is just because women are more likely to be their caretakers, which obviously plays a role. However…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:28 PM
0

Okay, who gives a fuck? Do you realize how successful our species is? >99.999% of people could die and humanity would still survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:16 PM
4

This is so silly. Let's say a woman punches her husband in the face, and a husband punches his wife in the face. Or how about a woman throws something at her husband's head, and a husband throws something at his wife's head. In either of those situations, who do you think is significantly more likely to end up in the ER? Obviously it's the woman, the man is significantly stronger. Does that matter? Not really, the wife was still attacking her husband because she wanted to hurt him. I mean, why e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:35 PM
2

It’s a systemic review. A systemic review is antithetical to the concept of cherry picking.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:25 PM
3

What the hell is “real violence”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:23 PM
3

It's not false, men are just stronger than women. A woman can punch her husband in the face and the risk of her maiming him is pretty low. If a man does that, he might seriously injure her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:00 PM
2

What does it matter? This is just a single example they provided. You think all of the cases are like this? If the strengths of the partners were inverted, then that shove could've ended up seriously harming the husband. Women are more likely to perform small acts of violence - a shove, throwing something at their head, etc. They aren't strong enough to hurt the husband when they do these things (most of the time).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:58 PM
3

Well golly gee, I didn’t realize that I was talking to an expert! You watched a documentary? That’s amazing! I agree with you. We shouldn’t let adult women make any big decisions on their own... It’s just way too easy to manipulate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:23 AM
0

If anyone is ignorant, it's you. The world is not going to end because of climate change or microplastics, every reasonable person already knows this. You fell for alarmist propaganda. Get a grip. unlivable, illness infested world Boo-hoo. This is just how life is, the world is a hostile place. Crazy to think that you're an adult who still hasn't come to terms with the fact that life is hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:05 AM
2

No, but you expect them to live as your servants. They perform all of the dirty work required to maintain your comfy little lifestyle. Lineman risk their lives to provide you with electricity. Wastewater operators spend their days smelling your putrid shit at sewage treatment plants, they make sure you don't get cholera and die. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:55 AM
-2

Arraigned marriages aren't sexual slavery. You're probably thinking of forced marriage. In an arraigned marriage, the woman is allowed to decline it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:48 AM
1

The inverse applies to you as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:36 AM
-3

"Oh no, the temperature of the planet is changing a little bit. Humanity is done for!" "Oh no, I have plastic in my balls. It might give me cancer when I'm 70 years old. It's over for me, why even try!" This is how ridiculous you sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:33 AM
2

Here's a systemic review: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2994556/ Studies report that women use as much or more physical intimate partner violence (IPV) as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:30 AM
5

Sure, but people would also lead suicidal charges into the wheels of juggernauts for no reason at all. From an outsider's perspective, it seems like you guys have an unhealthy obsession with suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:28 AM
4

Are you high? Do you think fathers like it when their daughters get ran through by dozens of men? I think most of them would prefer it if their daughters entered an arraigned marriage that lasted their entire lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:25 AM
2

The entitlement is so strong. I think you are entitled. Your life would not be possible without men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:20 AM
2

Are you Indian? I've heard that it was somewhat common for women to self-immolate en masse there, particularly after losing wars (to avoid sexual enslavement).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:17 AM
-4

Hahahaha "b-b-but climate change" How could you possibly think that climate change and microplastics pose an existential threat to humanity? Is this a parody account?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:13 AM
–

You're just coping. Women physically abuse their husbands more than men abuse their wives. This is the statistical reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:07 AM
-2

You could've married a guy who wasn't a drunk, lol. Your current situation is the result of your own choices. I guarantee that at multiple points in your life, you planned to have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:05 AM
11

Cant blame women solely for this. Women vote for liberal policies at significantly higher rates than men do. If women did not have the right to vote, governments in the West would be much more conservative. If these problems go away when they stop voting, then what the hell are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:02 AM
5

Women are more likely to perpetuate intimate partner violence than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 09:51 AM
1

The vast majority of women can be perceived as top-tier as well. They just have to be in shape.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:23 AM
2

I think it's usually because they're trying to secure a man by making themselves sexually available. The vast majority of women I had sex with once or twice were attempting to date me. At the time, I could tell that they were asking to have sex because they wanted a relationship with me, but I still decided to pump and dump them. I feel bad about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:21 AM
6

I feel like it's hard to gauge sexual compatibility in random hook-ups. Nerves are too high, both partners still have invisible walls up.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 07:41 AM
–

Nice LARP
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:13 AM
–

Females are typically diagnosed with Autism later than males. Women are more likely to be diagnosed as adults, men are more likely to be diagnosed as children. Imagine the impacts this would have on an individual's development. Once a child is diagnosed with Autism, their peculiar traits are less likely to be corrected by authority figures. The adults in their life will just say "oh well, X behavior is due to their Autism, they can't control it". I imagine this extends to their peers as well - i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:48 PM
–

It's a normal human behavior that every sane person on the planet employs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:28 PM
–

Autistic people aren't going to "develop" if there aren't negative repercussions for their bizarre social behaviors. Every "normal" person on the face of the planet has learned how to manage their quirks because it benefits them socially. You don't have to if you don't want to, but you can't expect the rest of society to just collectively put up with your shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:25 PM
–

Every normal person in society "masks". This isn't unique to autism. If a person is unable to do this, then they won't be able to have a normal life. That's just how it is. The entire premise is silly. You realize that we are animals, right? We all get intrusive thoughts and urges that we suppress and hide to manage our reputations.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:22 PM
4

What do you mean by money? Middle class? There generally aren’t many self-made women with significant wealth. 90% of millionaires are men, and this doesn’t even filter out people who were provided with wealth (inheritance, divorce, etc). I imagine if we excluded those people, the female percentage would be even smaller.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:17 AM
3

I don't understand. They're afraid of impoverished women "stealing" their man?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:01 AM
6

porn and pretty much anything that'd give men a sexual release I reject the idea that men require a "sexual release", especially not through porn. What the hell do you even mean by "release"? The urge never goes away, you're not being relieved of anything. If you watch pornography today, you will have a greater desire to watch it tomorrow. It's a never ending cycle, your desire for it increases with use. When you hunch over to suck your own dick, you take the form of an ouroboros.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 10:59 AM
3

Why would women advocate for this? Most of them aren't wealthy, they typically date men who make more money than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 10:39 AM
–

As a tall male, I theorize that allowing manlets to breed could be beneficial. You need to be thinking about this long-term. When a manlet finds a mate, it will most likely be an ugly woman. The woman might even be the result of a similar pairing. There is a very good chance that their children will end up even shorter/uglier than them. Meanwhile, the tall men will be procreating with the most beautiful women. If this trend continues for a few dozen generations, humanity will branch off into two…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 01:32 PM
–

shouldn't short women refrain from reproducing then? Do you think I'm arguing that short men shouldn't reproduce? How could you possibly think this? Women are more selective than men. I'm justifying their preference for height, not advocating for its enforcement.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 11:00 AM
–

Why does it matter whether or not you want kids? You still have natural inclinations. For example, you don't want kids, yet you still date and like "hunky meaty" men. You realize that you have these urges for reproductive purposes, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 10:52 AM
–

Less desirable? You mean not desirable at all. Ok. Does that change anything I said? No, manlets still need to suck it up and get over it. Short men could force women to marry them; however, you're specifically worried about women finding them undesirable. The women they coerced into marriage would still not be attracted to them, so this would not solve the problem. Perhaps we could run psyops and try to brainwash women into finding short men attractive. That's really the only direct action we c…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 10:41 AM
–

It's relevant because it doesn't "fucking" prove anything you just said. Most people stop using the apps when they enter a relationship, genius. Your emphasis on regularity has no logical explanation, it's just asinine. The burden of proof is on you to prove that women are autistically combing over their dates genetics What the fuck are you even talking about? I didn't argue that they were. On an app like Hinge, it's a filter you set. Also, male heights are displayed on their profiles, front-and…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 09:53 AM
–

Well, even if both parents are tall, there's still a risk that your children will be short. All you can do is increase the probability.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 09:29 AM
–

Right, you asked me "what happens with short men". Most of them will have a chance with some women, they're just less desirable than other men. I still don't understand why you're asking me this question. You want me to provide them with an justification that makes them feel better about themselves? Why is that my responsibility? It sucks to be less desirable than other men. That's it. The only practical advice I can give is "get over it".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 09:25 AM
–

I don't know. What are you asking me for?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:49 AM
–

Most women don't even regularly use dating apps and even if it did it still wouldn't prove anything you've said here. A considerable percentage of young women have used dating apps. I imagine it varies by survey, but is absolutely >25% in the United States. How the fuck is whether or not they use them "regularly" even relevant? All that matters is whether or not they set a minimum height on Hinge when they used the app. If women were mostly attracted to short guys you could just as easily say it…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:45 AM
–

That being said, this preference is not due to a conscious choice. I don't disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:34 AM
–

what do you suggest happens with short men then? In the USA, only 15% of men are >= 6 feet. I'm not going to take 6-7 wives for myself. There should still be women available for most of those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:31 AM
–

I didn't even come up with this conclusion. I'm merely describing the concept of sexual selection. How is the reasoning circular?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:23 AM
–

I'm defending this preference because I am very tall. I benefit from women having this preference. It's in my best interests for women to have this preference. I also genuinely think it's a rational preference to have. I really enjoy being tall, it's fucking great. I understand why women would want that for their offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:17 AM
–

Unless you’ve got some congenital condition this topic doesn't really come to mind much for most people. Are you joking? Why do dating apps have height filters? You pretending that women hardly even consider height is completely absurd. My post isn't even criticizing women for this preference. Why the hell do you even feel the need to be dishonest about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:08 AM
–

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:00 AM
–

What’s your evidence for this? It's just the concept of sexual selection. And what about women who don’t want children yet or at all? They'd still have a natural inclination to be sexually selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 07:59 AM
–

Which is a good thing. Would you rather be a Homo floresiensis?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 07:29 AM
1

It's not just about camaraderie within a specific group, it's about signaling to outsiders as well. This is easier to understand when looking at subcultures, but really it applies to any "identity". If your affiliation with a group identity establishes expectations in the minds of other individuals, how is it not signaling? These identities are just spooks. They're abstract ideas that haunt your mind, nothing more than constructs. How could they possibly describe who a person is in any meaningfu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 10:37 AM
2

Just like every heterosexual who has never had sex is still fine ‘identifying’ themselves as straight. I fundamentally disagree with you. The vast majority of heterosexuals are not 'identifying' themselves as straight, they just are straight. They're not attaching themselves to a sexual identity. I don't believe I've ever announced to people that I am heterosexual, nor heard anyone do this. I've never seen "cishet male" in a bio on social media. Heterosexuals generally don't adorn their property…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 09:41 PM
–

I can have a "good time" by drinking 10 beers and going out for a drive. Maybe I wrap my car around a tree and end up paralyzed from the neck down. Is that sad? Are you going to shed a tear for me? Compare this to a woman having sex with dozens of men. Instead of paralysis, she ends up with emotional scars. She'll probably have genital warps as well, maybe even a mild case of herpes. Is that sad? I don't care. She needs to keep her wart-riddled cooch away from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 10:32 AM
2

What does it matter? This discussion is about the people choosing to remain single because they cannot find someone who meets their expectations. Did you forget that?! You're just saying random shit at this point. Get it together.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 08:45 AM
1

Okay, sure. Your argument has implications that I believe to be dishonest. Most single women don't merely prefer men without poor finances. They desire wealthy men. Arguing that their intent is to avoid being sucked into a poor financial situation is a distortion of their true intent: to acquire wealth. You're implying that they are motivated by prudence. In reality, most are motivated by greed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 08:13 AM
0

Given the context of this discussion, I assumed you were making those claims from the perspective of single women. You offered up "poor finances (of men)" as a possible explanation for why having a "committed partner" is not enough of an incentive for many women. Is this not the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 07:48 AM
0

If they're constantly in debt or have bad finances it will have a significant impact on your life too. This applies to single women significantly more than it applies to single men. Men as an overall demographic carry more debt; however, we should be looking at single adults for our statistics to be relevant to this discussion. According to the Federal Reserve, women are much worse off financially. Single women have higher installment loan balances, higher credit utilization, more delinquencies,…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 07:37 AM
3

Idk my mood is a bit too inflammatory to be around that level of straw man. Nothing I said is even a straw man, you've consistently disregarded certain victims of domestic violence. You are insulting to the hundreds of women who are murdered and permanently disabled by their male partners every year. No I'm not. Bottom line is gen z women are being pushed away from heterosexual relationships because of the RP Wasn't dating amongst young people in decline before the "red pill" movement even exist…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 11:07 AM
3

Sorry, I must've forgotten that the only victims that matter are the ones you've decided to focus on today. The entire world revolves around your delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:33 AM
6

No it wasn't. You're the one whose takeaway is completely flawed. 67.4% of lesbian women reported only female perpetrators of IPV. Do you not understand what the implications of "only" are? EDIT: I cannot respond to their comment, because they blocked me. They replied and then blocked me. I imagine it's because they realized that they were spreading blatant, indefensible misinformation. Many such cases. Sad!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:19 AM
6

What study do you think I am referring to? Because there are multiple. EDIT: When this person realizes that they are wrong, they like to leave a final reply, then block the person they are arguing with. It's their modus operandi.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:09 AM
7

The reality is that lesbians are significantly more likely than heterosexual women to experience intimate partner violence. Sexual violence is also quite common in lesbian relationships, it can be as high as 55%. Why "sexual violence" instead of rape? Because a significant percentage of scientific literature will only classify an act as "rape" if it involved penetration. What's "relevant" is the fact that you have a tendency to disregard statistics that do not align with your wittle worldview. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:07 AM
3

What? If you think I believe this, then you misunderstood my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 09:42 AM
4

Do you also think the statistics on lesbian domestic abuse are "distorted"? an objectively 10/10 woman I guarantee that she wasn't a 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 09:03 AM
5

Do you think sexual access is distributed evenly amongst all men? Does that sound rational to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 08:31 AM
8

Lesbians also have significantly higher rates of domestic abuse
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 08:19 AM
3

Women will 'identify' themselves as LGBTQ+ and never actually date a woman. They just say that they're bisexual because they made out with a girl once or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 08:18 AM
11

No sister, society doesn't hate older women, they just become irrelevant as they age. They don't even become irrelevant. They just get less attention than they used to. Guys their own age and above are still attractive to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:29 AM
3

I don't care. I will never stop leering at women. Why would I need an excuse? It's not illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:08 AM
–

I can understand why there would be more evidence in favor of something like CBT, because I believe that the skills taught through it are generally helpful. The issue, and the fundamental issue with all mental "healthcare", is that this is my own subjective opinion. There's really not an objective way to measure whether or not something like "cognitive restructuring" is actually helpful. So when these things are advertised as evidence-based, or referred to as another form of "healthcare", it's j…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:03 AM
3

Nobody claims therapy is like taking an ibuprofen, if possible say this, they are wrong. It's soft science, not hard science. Yes they do. What the hell? It's referred to as a form of "mental healthcare". What do you personally think differentiates psychotherapy from life-coaching or religion? Maybe you or people who say this confuse it with psychiatry These two fields are deeply intertwined. In many cases, psychologists diagnose and psychiatrists prescribe. The determinations of a psychologist …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:41 AM
2

I don't disagree with you, but what you are saying applies to any faith-based belief system. "How can you disregard Christianity when you haven't opened your heart up to Jesus?" My issue with this is that when people promote psychotherapy, they claim that it is evidence-based. That it is a legitimate "medical treatment", and thus as scientifically valid as a doctor telling a patient with arthritis to take ibuprofen (I'm using the example you provided). It clearly is not, though. When you say "yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:47 AM
2

Can therapy stand on its own merits? Or do people have to approach it with faith?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 05:35 AM
4

you have to be open to therapy for it to work You have to be open to delusion to become deluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 05:21 AM
7

It's clearly a grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 05:19 AM
2

Many horror stories about employees having to sleep under their office desks while rushing to get the product out. I don't think you realize how many people in tech are willing participants of this. They enjoy this culture, that's why they attend hackathons where they rush to build something while operating on a minimal amount of sleep. This isn't even really a "capitalism" thing, it's more like a symptom of peoples' dedication to their craft. It's super common in the arts. For example, Miyazaki…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 09:17 AM
1

I would argue that they are complicit; however, many are also victims. A lot of people, young men especially, were exposed to it as children. If someone has been using porn to feel good since they were 12, of course they will develop an unhealthy attachment to it! They never even stood a chance. Regardless, it does not excuse them from being complicit. A lot of pedos claim that they were abused, that doesn't excuse their actions. So yes, porn viewers are complicit in the abuse, especially if the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 07:05 AM
–

If you knew what I meant, I'm not sure why you said that stuff about the utility of male sexual desires. I'm trying to understand your worldview, but it's difficult. If the desires to defile, possess, own and dominate are inherently perverse, is life itself not perverse? Is this what you believe? No organism can survive without the consumption of resources and/or other organisms. Is a person who merely seeks to survive a pervert?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:49 AM
–

Well, whether or not something is "perverse" is a moral judgment. For what it's worth, I agree with you that people who seek to sexually exploit others are perverted, especially if they use violence to do that. What I meant is that I don't believe the base desires you listed, "to defile, to possess, to own, to dominate", are inherently perverse. It depends on how those desires manifest. They are present in all humans, men and women, and can cause malevolence in both sexes. For example, female bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 12:39 AM
–

Sorry, but you have no idea what you’re talking about. He discussed how man's brutish and cruel desires are manifestations of the will to power in various writings. This is from Beyond Good and Evil: "Exploitation" does not belong to a depraved, or imperfect and primitive society it belongs to the nature of the living being as a primary organic function, it is a consequence of the intrinsic Will to Power
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 09:37 PM
–

perverse desires males seem to have like the desire to defile, to possess, to own, to dominate… This is what Nietzsche referred to as the "will to power". I don't think it's inherently perverse. These desires propel our species forward, so it most likely has been a net gain for humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 01:22 PM
–

The person without any self awareness is you. You're writing fiction and attempting to pass it off as reality. Sad!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 12:13 PM
-9

If I think a woman is attractive, then I respect her. I absolutely do not hate her. She could be a serial killer and I think I'd still like her a little bit. Really, how could I hate on a cute dame? That'd be like me hating an adorable little kitten. It just doesn't make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 10:59 AM
3

Every conservative women I've met in real life is, at minimum, 40. I don't think I've ever met a conservative woman my age. I don't really have a choice. Regardless, absolutely none of the women I've dated really have convictions on any political topics beyond "women's rights" shit (e.g. abortion). When they say they are socialist, I think they are just LARPing and talking out of their ass. So it's pretty easy to just scoff at and ignore it. Then I think to myself "the founding fathers were prob…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 10:55 AM
1

It absolutely is true throughout the vast majority of categories. The U.S. does not have the best doctors, best treatments, best facilities. Generally speaking, we do. What you're arguing is just factually inaccurate. Sure, I imagine there are examples of specific fields we do not excel within. However, for the majority fields within healthcare, we are at or near the top (in terms of our specialists, treatments, facilities, technologies, hell even medicines). but we do not have the best in almos…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 10:46 AM
1

Could you be more specific? My best guess is that you're talking about an experimental cancer treatment. Is that correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 10:31 AM
1

The helium that goes into balloons is typically a low-grade byproduct of other applications. We aren’t below the top 20 in quality healthcare because of rare resources. We are ranked even lower in over healthcare system because so few people have access to it. According to who? Some random ass ranking website arbitrarily ranking countries? This is silly. If we're exclusively looking at capabilities, the US healthcare system is easily the best in the world. We have access to better specialists, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 03:37 AM
1

It isn't a stupid example. I believe 25-30% of our current helium supply is used in healthcare. This is with a large barrier-of-entry (they cost a lot of money). If they were made more affordable, there would be a massive increase in their utilization, and thus a massive increase in our consumption of helium. Modern MRIs lose almost zero helium throughout their lifetime The majority of machines still in use utilize vented systems. The machines that re-condense helium aren't perfect. And complete…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 11:53 PM
-5

I'd be okay with my tax dollars feeding and sheltering hobo Bill, but only if the state kept him in a group home, mental institution or prison. Then hobo Bill won't be a public nuisance.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 10:20 AM
-1

Edit: if all you want to do is argue about healthcare, please see here for how I don't care and stop missing the forest for the trees, thanks If your idea of utopia wasn't completely delusional, you'd be able to rationally explain how it is possible. Nobody is "missing the forest for the trees", you're just unable to form an intelligent argument. All you have are empty platitudes. There is no substance to this, it's a fiction you've invented in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 10:14 AM
2

It is not Yes it is. Refute any of the examples I provide. Are you going to shit helium out of your ass so MRIs only cost $10? You've "lost interest" because you're starting to realize that your entire worldview hinges on deranged fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 08:22 AM
4

fortune-telling isn't a rebuttal This isn't "fortune-telling", it's objective reality. it's about the ability to afford healthcare. No, it's not possible. What does "afford healthcare" even mean to you? Should MRIs be affordable? What happens when we run out of liquid helium, genius? No more MRIs until our supplies are replenished. Great job! Should CAR T-cell therapy be affordable? How do you figure we can manage that? The cells of each patient need to be genetically modified, a task that takes…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 08:13 AM
-3

It's ridiculous that I need to spell this out for you. Just because other countries currently have "affordable" healthcare, does not mean that what they are doing is sustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 07:46 AM
0

You said "I must be unfamiliar with the part in history where most men were dating and we didn't have capitalism." Capitalism didn't exist throughout the majority of human history. In various societies prior to its existence, the majority of men were in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 07:42 AM
4

Capitalism was not around for most of human history, it is a relatively modern invention.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 07:34 AM
-5

You are the one who appears to lack a "basic grasp of the world". There are limited resources. For example, MRI machines require liquid helium, and our supply of it is running thin. The doctors themselves are a limited resource, we can't just enslave clinicians. Do you think every aspect of our healthcare system (technology, man power, raw materials) just materializes out of the aether? This isn't a fucking video game.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 07:23 AM
-6

I don't think people should have to choose between seeing the doctor and affording food. Do you think that there are infinite resources in the world? There aren't. People will inevitably have to make choices like these.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 07:06 AM
1

I already addressed this. YOU HAVE MORE FREE TIME THAN MOST OF YOUR ANCESTORS. This is just an indisputable fact. Your entire argument hinges on absolute nonsense. Even if some of your ancestors had shorter workweeks, they lacked technologies that make daily tasks significantly less time-consuming. Imagine how stressed you'd be with no refrigeration, running water, electric/gas stoves, washing machines, modern grocery stores, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:19 PM
1

We're talking about adults here. I'm not going to take my 20 year old son to a LEGO mindstorms class with grade schoolers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:14 PM
0

Sure, but if your choice is shit then you can't force people to like you. You especially can't force women to want to have sex with you. What if my hobby was devising medieval torture devices for rodents? Perhaps I liked to build rat traps that skinned them alive. Would you defend my right to have this hobby? I don't believe this would be illegal, vermin are usually exempt from animal cruelty laws. So would you tell me to "just enjoy it"?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:33 AM
1

It's plastic shit with no utility beyond amusement for children (and apparently some maladjusted adults). We're depleting non-renewable resources to produce toys that do not biodegrade and are functionally useless. There are more productive and sustainable ways to relieve stress. I never advocated that people should smoke or drink. What the hell are you even talking about? Do you think that people only have three choices? They can either smoke, drink or play with LEGOs. Why doesn't AA tell alcoh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:14 AM
-1

Most hobbies aren't playing with toys that are the constructional equivalent of paint-by-numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:57 AM
-1

Then you're an adult male wasting vast sums of money on toys. If my son did this, I would disown him. I'd force him to sound with a 1x8 brick
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:44 AM
1

That’s because of the capitalistic economic situation that humanity has put itself in What a bizarre claim. The "capitalistic economic situation" has provided you with a significantly better life than the vast majority of your ancestors. You have access to more resources, you even have more free time. You're in a better position to raise children than most of them were. Birth rates declining is OBVIOUSLY the direct result of birth control and abortion. Ideology most likely plays a part as well. …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:33 AM
2

Women have been oppressed and subjugated by the patriarchy for millenia into being in relationships they don't actually want. No they haven't been. Stop reading fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:22 AM
3

They need to be good at "nerd" things that actually have utility. If all they do is play video games or build LEGO sets, most women will despise them. Rightfully so, the entirety of society should bite their thumbs at manchildren. If they're a highly-skilled engineer, chemist, physicist, etc, then they are nerdmaxxing properly. Women will appreciate their intelligence and financial stability. If they have a bit of status/prestige within their field, I imagine that's particularly attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:20 AM
–

I don’t think we evolved to sleep 8 hours straight, it’s not exactly natural. Polyphasic sleep was very common up until the past ~150 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:16 AM
–

I said it assumes superiority, not authority. My entire argument is that these things are subjective, I'm not sure how that is an assumption of superiority. Raising kids is stressful. Saying it isn't is pure arrogance. Yes, aspects of parenting are stressful. This doesn't change the fact that your experiences are shaped by your expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 09:31 PM
–

It seemed like they were arguing that sleep deprivation and the stress associated with it are unavoidable. The point I was making is that parents still have more than enough time to rest/sleep. Their sleep schedule will change for a few months, but sleep deprivation is not a requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 08:50 AM
–

Nobody is arguing you should neglect your child, they're just arguing that you shouldn't mentally stress yourself out over child rearing. Really, this applies to all aspects of life. Whether or not you something stressful is the result of your own perspective. If you view the act of raising a child as this massive burden, and constantly think about how even minor decisions can negatively impact your child's entire life, you're going to be significantly more likely to stress yourself out over not…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 08:44 AM
–

What unnecessary load? Did you even read the post? He's talking about the unnecessary mental load. There's nothing inherently stressful about picking your kids up from school or spending time with them. The stress one feels is entirely due to their perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 07:32 AM
–

Newborn babies require significantly more sleep than adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 07:25 AM
0

It seems like you are one projecting that binary onto the red pillers. I don't think they argue a total binary exists. That would be silly, of course there are some women who date average men. The broad reality is that a lot of statements can only be applied partially. It depend of the demographic Dude, I don't even think you realize how incoherent this sounds. I'm not confused, the statements you are making are just nonsense. If you change/limit the demographics of an existing generalization, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 10:29 AM
6

This is complete nonsense. You say there is some truth to the claim, then argue that the people making it are dumb. How the fuck can there be "some truth" to a generalization?! If I say "most humans like sex", then I'm either wrong or right. That isn't a statement that can be partially true. Then you argue that they "demonstrate a lack of understanding on how things really operated broadly"... What the fuck? You realize the generalization itself applies broadly?! Your comment isn't even coherent…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 10:10 AM
6

You're going out of your way to avoid admitting that if I did that to you, you would describe it as "doxxing". Just be honest for once in your life. I've never posted a photo of my ID on a public website What does this even have to do with the question I asked you? The hypothetical does not involve a photo of your ID. When you go on these unrelated rants, it makes obvious that you're intentionally avoiding the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:11 PM
5

What? I already provided you with the definition of doxxing, but it's irrelevant to this question. Using your own definition, would you say that you were "doxxed" if I determined your identity then posted your name, photos and relationship history on reddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 08:19 PM
5

Answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 07:01 PM
3

proves they care about the information there They don't care about it for their safety. The vast majority of women on the app just enjoy the gossip, they find it stimulating. Other women might like the fake sense of power and control it gives them. Very few are primarily utilizing the app to "stay safe".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:20 AM
1

If I figured out who you were, and started posting your name, pictures of your face and your relationship history, I would be doxxing you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:07 AM
10

Posting any personal information without a person's consent in an effort to shame, harass or intimidate them is doxxing. The Tea app is "actual doxxing". Tea afaik wasn't dedicated to doxxing- the only address and other type of personal information the app had If I found your name and pictures of your face, then included them in this comment because I wanted to intimidate and shame you, would you not consider that doxxing?! What if I also included your relationship history? Would you not feel vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:01 AM
5

It seems to me that men are just completely confused by the concept of having to worry about their reputations. Men are familiar with reputation management in normal social situations, everyone is. Your lack of empathy stems from you conflating gossip on the Tea app with gossip that occurs inside of relatively small social groups. Do you really not understand the difference? Comments made on Tea stay there indefinitely and are, in theory, accessible by all women. The scales of time and reach are…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:50 AM
1

Sure thing buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 06:01 PM
1

Here's an example, found in a few seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 07:40 AM
0

never resulted in towns burned down Are you talking about Tulsa? Once again, this is an example that occurred because people thought a black man assaulted a person. What actually sparked the riots was a gun fight between groups of black and white men. So, what exactly does this story have to do sexual insecurity? entire peoples genocided If anyone is insecure, it is clearly you hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 07:36 AM
1

I agree with you. I'm just arguing that white men aren't uniquely insecure about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:25 AM
0

I'm not going to act like some white dude getting shit on for chasing black women in the modern day in any way compares, and you hand wringing about it lets me know where your head is at. I'm not making a comparison. Your entire argument was that white men are uniquely sexually insecure, so I provided you with examples of black men displaying sexual insecurity as well. Also, it's worth nothing that the vast majority of lynchings involved allegations of assault, rape and/or murder. Often the alle…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:20 AM
3

Go look at dating app statistics then get back to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 07:29 AM
2

As a black man I can tell you a major factor of American racism is sexual fears of inadequacy amongst white men. Are you sure this isn't just your own fantasy? I'm sure that you want to believe it is true... but is it? Whenever you see a black woman dating a white guy on social media, the comments are full of black men disparaging her. I've also seen numerous posts of black women discussing the hate they receive over dating a white guy. Really, every group of people has a sexual bias towards peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:24 AM
0

I believe that the ROOT of why men have voted against their own self interests... The issue is that you're making the assumption that socialism is somehow in their best interests. Why would you do this? Have you deluded yourself into believing that socialism is an objectively better political philosophy? Maybe men vote against "free gibs" because they're not exclusively attracted to that which will immediately benefit them. Maybe they have a more realistic and strategic understanding than you. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:04 AM
–

Imagine how many dudes they've been with if they give it up that easy
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:37 AM
3

Men are statistically far more violent than women Not domestically. Men and women commit domestic violence at similar rates. If you want to be shocked, look at the rates of domestic violence amongst lesbians. Lesbian women are MORE LIKELY to experience domestic violence than heterosexual women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 07:54 AM
1

Not intimate partner violence... Women get physically violent with their partners at similar rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 07:51 AM
2

I wonder what one focused on anger and violence might conclude? Women are violent as well. Studies indicate that both men and women report experiencing domestic violence at similar rates. Men are just less likely to report it to police.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 07:49 AM
2

There's a place your mother goes, when everybody else is soundly sleeping. Through the lights of Seattle's streets, and if you listen, you can hear her weeping. She's weeping....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 07:11 AM
4

most men end up growing out of it and losing their virginity and getting into relationships Men are struggling to find long-term partners. Getting laid isn't the primary issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 03:33 AM
1

Yes I was. Do I have a "have a huge problem with women who prefer to stay single"? I didn't attack your relationship status at all in my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 06:57 AM
1

I'm a flawed individual. I respond with hostility when I feel as though others are intentionally misrepresenting me, because I care about that. I'm not sure what you mean by 'thinly veiled contempt', it was pretty clear in that comment. I genuinely do not care about your relationship status, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 09:32 PM
1

Raskolnikov wasn't "driven by guilt", he was tormented by it after the murder. He's driven by what is essentially a superiority complex. You seem to acknowledge this when you state he possessed: a desire to separate himself from “common” people Do you not see how this is comparable to your beliefs? You stated that you are "overqualified" and "can't lower [yourself] to accept mediocrity". Your comparison only has validity if I was fantasizing about being above moral consequence No, not really. Cr…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 09:16 PM
0

Amazing, that must why they are disorders and not diseases. Go do more research.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 07:47 PM
0

Right. Ok then buddy lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:58 PM
1

Why do they need help to deal with it? What is there to help them deal with, exactly? Depression isn't a tangible medical condition like cancer. It's really just a concept, a label referring to specific behaviors/experiences. I could make this same argument about a lot of experiences, that doesn't make it valid. For example, I could ask "What alternatives to gay conversion therapy would you like society to provide?". When someone says "Why do we need an alternative? There's nothing wrong with be…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 11:17 AM
0

It IS coping. If you say it's not then you don't really know what coping means. No it's not. You don't understand the psychological definition of "coping". A cope is a less distressing belief used to avoid a harsh truth. Acknowledging that truth and choosing to live with it is not coping, the person doing this isn't inventing some alternative reality to deal with the truth. However, it is quite common for people with unchecked mental health issues to fall into vices like drugs and general addict…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 10:54 AM
1

Do you think mental institutions existed for most of human history? Regardless, people with depression and anxiety wouldn't be forced into them. They either learned how to deal with it or they didn't. Why is that bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 10:30 AM
1

What? I don't care about her being single, nothing I said even implies that. I was criticizing her superiority complex. It seems like you desperately want to believe that I care about her relationship status, though. Stop projecting your little fantasies onto me, nobody cares that you are 4B.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 10:07 AM
2

You telling yourself that therapy will just teach you to cope is your cope for not going to therapy. This isn't true. Recognizing your situation and deciding to just live with it is the opposite of coping. Going to therapy to be reassured on a weekly basis is the definition of coping. The guy who gives up and resigns himself to unhealthy copes like video games, drugs, and porn is coping just as much as the guy who goes to therapy to gain a new perspective and not lose energy despite his struggle…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 09:25 AM
1

What exactly do you think they did for most of human history?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 09:20 AM
0

They aren't real medical conditions. No mental disorder is, all disorders are merely labels for specific behaviors and experiences. Depression does not cause you feel to feel sad. This is impossible, because "depression" does not exist. It's not like it's a tumor with a physical presence, it's merely a concept. Instead, you just feel sad, so you meet the diagnostic criteria for depression. Does this make sense to you? Depression is not a real condition causing symptoms. It is just a label for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 09:18 AM
1

I can’t lower myself to accept mediocrity. You sound like a female version of Rodion Raskolnikov. You are destined for mediocrity, you just haven't realized it yet. That's not a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 08:34 AM
0

You still have freedom of choice within the network. I doubt that there's a single therapist available within yours. Unless you live in a remote, rural area, there are multiple providers to choose from. Even if you did, that'd be the result of your location, not the "system".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 02:19 AM
2

Lolll what are you basing this off of? A significant percentage of women have gone to therapy. 25% of adult women in America have received mental health treatment IN THE PAST YEAR. Do you think 25% of the female population experiences debilitating mental illness? If not, why would you even ask me this question? If they're functioning normally then good for them. They don't need therapy. What if they had the same level of mental distress as someone in therapy? A person can be distressed and just …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 10:33 AM
1

No it wouldn't validate flat earthers, because lessening the credibility of a proof doesn't make any other hypothesis more true. I said that it'd validate their skepticism, not their shitty little theory. Do you disagree with this? I think you have a wrong understanding of science as a whole. I think you do. A few years ago in CERN an experiment "proved" that relativity was wrong. This is a mistake in execution. It does not undermine the principles the field is grounded in. Physics is using math…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 08:55 AM
1

Women ATTEMPT suicide more than men, so your argument isn't even valid. There are less men making the decision to kill themselves, but when they do, they pick more lethal methods than women. A major contributor to this is probably just the fact that men are more likely to own firearms.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 10:33 PM
2

Literally the only person in my entire life who ever said “maybe you should get mad and show it even if it scares people that’s not your responsibility to make them feel comfortable” rather than “whoaaaaaa chill out it’s not that big of a deal, you need to (banal stoic platitude)” Is this even good advice? It's not rational to explode on people, especially if you want to maintain a relationship with them. Being an abusive and neurotic presence is a great way to make people not want to be near yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 10:22 PM
2

I think, respectfully, that many of the people who like to blast therapy as useless escapism either don't really have the kinds of struggles, trauma etc. that warrant therapy What an absolutely ridiculous thing to say. You're acting like people don't have varying levels of fortitude, but they do. Of course there are people that can handle significantly more mental suffering than you without requiring support. I recognize that there are people with debilitating forms of PTSD, I imagine specific t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 06:32 PM
-1

Why does your insurance pick your therapist for you? You’re probably able to shop for one, it just requires you to research who is covered by your insurance. Don’t be helpless
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 06:13 PM
3

I say this as an ex-professional scientist (researcher in chemistry): there is no such thing as an exact science. Well, physics is referred to as an exact science because the level of precision is practically the maximum it can be within the realm of human understanding. Do you think the subjective nature of psychology is even remotely comparable to chemistry? What the fuck are you even talking about? I'm sure that it is nearly impossible to isolate a chemical with 100% purity, but the standards…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 10:36 AM
0

You're exactly right. The solution for most neuroses is to not think about them. Sadly, you cannot consciously make an effort to not think about something, but at minimum you shouldn't be dwelling on it and over-analyzing it for an hour on a weekly basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 09:51 AM
0

I don't think the conversations are similar. I believe they monologue about their feelings in front of their friends in a similar manner, but the back-n-forth conversation is obviously different. Also, the therapist should actually be listening. Their friends are just responding with empty platitudes and waiting for their turn to monologue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 09:41 AM
1

It's not that I think "the science is wrong", I just don't view it as much of a science at all. Psychological studies exclusively include subjective measures. They either rely on a rater to make a subjective determination or assume that specific life outcomes are positive. The closest thing to an objective measure I can think of would be suicide rates. I only see one longitudinal study that looks at this, it found people who went to therapy were 26% less likely to commit suicide. This brings us …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 09:07 AM
-7

Then why are people telling that woman to switch therapists in the post I linked to? This isn't abnormal, I've seen numerous posts where people are considering switching therapists because their therapist told them something they do not like.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:31 AM
4

No, this isn't true for medicine as a whole. It primarily affects studies with subjective measures, e.g. whether or not a treatment provided mood improvements. Studies with results that can be objectively tested, e.g. whether or not a medicine cures a disease, won't be affected nearly as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:29 AM
-1

The issue is this misconception that ADHD is anything at all. It's not a tangible medical condition, it's literally just a label for specific behaviors/traits. That's all a disorder really is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:01 AM
1

What do you think ADHD is? It's not a disease dude, it's a disorder. So the most we can say is that it's a grouping of behaviors that may or not have an underlying cause. You seem to be under the impression that ADHD is a tangible medical condition that causes executive dysfunction. This is false, it is actually just a label used to describe behaviors/traits that include executive dysfunction.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 07:57 AM
7

Psychology has been the field most affected by the replication crisis. There really aren't any organizations funding anti-therapy research. If there were, we'd see more of it, because you can generate bullshit research for any of the soft sciences. I don't care about your meta-analyses because OVER HALF of psychology studies are not reproducible.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 07:49 AM
-17

How is therapy hard? You're just making these assertions which are clearly false. Most women enjoy talking about and analyzing themselves. Even if they're not seeing a therapist, they talk about the same shit with their friends. If they didn't like it, they would not go, especially considering the cost. They enjoy it. It's not difficult, it feels good to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 07:42 AM
-4

It just sounds like you've fallen for the grift of therapy. Good therapists know how to ask the right questions to get you to think about things you otherwise push down. What does it even matter if most people lie to their therapists? It's very anti-intellectual. No, it's not. Do you know which field is most prominently associated with the replication crisis? Psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 07:39 AM
-3

"Look at this inkblot, what do you see?" "Look at my butthole, first peek is free"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 07:09 AM
5

Yes, advice like this is always shit on by people who claim to be mentally ill. They especially hate when people tell them 'go outside, get some sunlight'. 40-60% of the population is deficient in vitamin D. Look up the symptoms for vitamin D deficiency: fatigue, anxiety, irritability, etc. If you go to the hospital with symptoms of depression, they typically don't even check your vitamin D levels before they refer to a psychiatrist and/or psychologist. So going outside can probably have a posit…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 06:59 AM
–

But if healthcare professionals and the patiants found out this is the bast way for them and it improves their well being I wouldn't oppose it. The determinations of healthcare professionals are irrelevant. It is clearly wrong to cut off a person's limb for no legitimate medical reason. Similarly, it is wrong to sever a person's prefrontal cortex and intentionally give them brain damage. A significant percentage of people who received lobotomies actually saw improvements in their mental state. D…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:13 AM
0

Now compare that to people needed gender affirming care but didn't get it Ok, let's assume that this is true, and gender affirming care significantly reduces the risk of suicide. Does this even matter? Let's say we were looking at people with BIID (Body Integrity Identity Disorder), and I made the argument that safely amputating their limbs reduces their risk of suicide. Would you support the medical mutilation of people with BIID? I think we should treat the underlying mental disorder and help …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:04 PM
-1

Other cultures have had different, or even third genders for centuries. This is not a new thing. The vast majority of societies did not. The concepts you're referencing aren't even remotely comparable to modern gender theory, which was invented very recently. Native Americans had two-spirit as a gender, for example. This is, once again, a modern term invented in the 90s to refer to a wide array of completely different concepts in Native American cultures. Most of these societies absolutely did n…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 09:22 AM
-1

"Unscientific" according to who, WPATH? You'd believe anything
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:53 AM
5

Not really, people who've received gender-affirming care have a suicide rate that is 19 times higher than the general population. Even if to you it’s some sort of mental illness, why does it matter so long as they’re happy and they’re not hurting anybody? I explain why in the comment you just replied to. Really nice reading comprehension. As transgenderism becomes increasingly accepted and encouraged by society, more people start identifying as transgender. Many of them are just confused, we sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:17 AM
0

No it doesn't. Our current concept of gender is a modern invention. Maybe do a bit of research before you embarrass yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:12 AM
2

Most of the time they identify as the other gender because they find it sexually stimulating.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:05 AM
3

What do I care? I also haven't had a meaningful conversation with the homeless schizos that mumble to themselves outside of my apartment, because I believe that they are deranged. Why would I take anything they say seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:03 AM
7

For the life of me I'll never understand why can't we leave people who self-harm alone. We should support their mental illness and make it easier for them to cut themselves. Ideally, they should raise pro self-harm awareness so more people delude themselves into thinking that they should self harm. Does this sound like progress?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:56 AM
–

What the fuck are you even talking about? A person can have conscious desires that exist separately from their instincts (although they are typically influenced by them). Are you not aware of the fact that we get horny because it encourages reproduction?! Sex feels good for the same exact reason, your brain rewards you when it thinks you've finished mating. Whether or not you used birth control or don't plan to actually have children has NO effect on the underlying processes that occur for evolu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:24 AM
–

I wonder if there is an evolutionary reason for this. If you were banging the same guy for months, and failing to get pregnant, then there's a good chance he's infertile and a genetic dead end. Maybe there is something in your reptilian brain that makes you lose interest in him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 04:00 AM
–

"Sexual compatibility" seems like some shit women would worry about, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 03:54 AM
1

What? You're just wrong. The vast majority of women weren't forced into marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 02:28 AM
2

When women were seen as property and had no say in marriage. This wasn't common at all in Western society.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 04:31 AM
6

No offense man, but this is just brutal. into video games, comics and LEGOs All your 'hobbies' are just unproductive means of escapism. Has this always been the case, or did you start using these things to cope later in life? I would think that they are the source of your problems, at minimum they've made your situation significantly worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:25 AM
4

I am demoralized. I go on dates with women regularly but can't really picture myself being in a long-term relationship with any of them. We just have absolutely nothing in common, many of them come across to me and neurotic and self-obsessed and I just cannot picture myself being in a happy relationship with any of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:07 AM
9

It seems like you aren't sure about what makes a man impressive. Is it his moral character? Or is it his status?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 04:52 AM
3

Apparently no woman in the history of the world has ever tried to sleep with the man her friend is in a serious (or even casual) relationship with. No guy has ever had sex with an entire friend group of females because they were all competing with eachother for his attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 04:47 AM
2

I would be approached on a semi-regular basis when I was younger and would go out drinking and partying. They'd randomly start talking to me, sometimes initiate physical contact (usually by leaning on me), then it'd take off from there. This hasn't happened since I stopped drinking. I'm not sure how it would happen. I suppose I am still approached by women in grocery stores somewhat regularly, but it's always just them asking me to grab something off the top shelf for them, and it's usually an o…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 02:51 AM
4

Trans people as they exist today have absolutely NOT existed throughout "all of human history". This is the most ridiculous, blatantly false thing I have ever read. Our current concept of gender, which the entirety of transgender ideology relies upon, was only created in the last century.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:27 AM
2

Imane Khelif is a dude, that's what the leaked report shows. If they weren't, it'd be super easy to disprove these "allegations".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:15 AM
–

I'd rather be single. The point I'm making is that you already seem to believe in the concept of autonomy with duties. You "don't think conscription is ethical" and ultimately don't want to force men to serve; however, believe them to be "worthless" if they choose not to fight. This same logic could apply to women refusing to marry. It's clearly not great for society when people refuse to get married or start families. So why can't I make the argument that women shouldn't be forced into marriage…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 07:37 PM
–

I'd argue that its acting on your humanity to protect others. It's in your interests to make that argument. Women are larger and more capable than children. Why shouldn't they also be conscripted to protect kids? You can endlessly rephrase to change the meaning of anything. No, you cannot infinitely re-frame something without it completely losing relevancy. That's exactly what the idiotic examples you came up with accomplished, they're not relevant to the moral interpretation of this event in an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 10:17 AM
–

Choosing to not marry/have children is pretty different from choosing to not save someone from rape/slavery. Of course it's different. You're asking the defender to make a significantly larger sacrifice, they'd effectively be giving up their own humanity to preserve yours. This can be rephrased to completely change its meaning. Instead of "choosing to not save someone from rape/slavery", I could rephrase it as "choosing not to kill other people and/or die in an effort to kill other people, all t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 08:09 AM
–

I don't think forced marriage is ethical, but every single woman who refuses to marry and have children is a pretty worthless person. How do you feel about that statement? Do you find it offensive, reprehensible?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 06:16 AM
–

Let's do a little thought experiment: An army is invading the USA, and their goal is to sell the women here into sexual slavery. They significantly outnumber our current army, and without the conscription of men, we will surely lose. Under these circumstances, do you think it is morally acceptable to force men to fight? Are you opposed to the autonomy of men being violated if it is done in an effort to protect you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 05:36 AM
–

Why do you think women need autonomy? Do men need autonomy? Does anyone actually have autonomy? You are not independent, you rely on other people to survive, we all do. You really don't have self-governance. Choices are being made for you all the time, often by reality itself, but also by lesser authority figures. Did you choose to come into existence? No, you've been taken for a ride against your will, and are hanging on for dear life. Autonomy isn't a real construct, it doesn't actually exist.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 05:05 AM
2

Everyone on the face of the planet "masks". It's normal stigma management. Women especially do this around men they are just starting to date, but men do it as well. Eventually we become more open, but it's not abnormal at all to hide specific aspects of yourself in the initial stages of a relationship. People act completely deranged when they are alone. They talk to themselves, pace around their apartments, fart in their hand and then bring it up to their face to smell it, etc. They do things t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 10:21 PM
2

neurotypical and neurodiverse These are fake concepts that do not mean anything. Mental disorders aren't "real" medical conditions, they are merely a collection of traits/behaviors that society has deemed to be abnormal. Thinking "I have ADHD so I am impulsive and have executive dysfunction" is incorrect. In reality, it's "I am impulsive and have executive dysfunction so I meet the diagnostic criteria for ADHD". Do you see the difference? If a mental disorder is just a label for a set of charact…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 10:04 PM
1

Arraigned marriage and forced marriage aren't the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:56 AM
3

This is just factually inaccurate. Everything you mention only really applied to the aristocracy. Go read a history book.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 11:54 AM
1

This is unintelligible. Am I having a stroke?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:17 PM
1

A lot of health issues can be. If I die, who cares? I won't care. I'll be dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:15 PM
-4

I already cut my own hair, taught myself how to do it during the "pandemic" and then just kept doing it. It's not even hard. If I feel like a restaurant is overcharging for something that I've learned is easy and inexpensive to make, then I don't go to that restaurant. Sorry for bursting your bubble, but lots of surgeons already do charge whatever the hell they want for procedures that are quite simple. Lots of healthcare is like this, so I 'diy' healthcare whenever possible. For example, I thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:26 AM
-2

Some of these arguments do seem to be stemming from privilege. For example: Was it a privilege when I had to take my husband or my FIL or a male friend to a mechanic so that I don't get ripped off? You have the privilege to operate a piece of heavy machinery on a daily basis without even having to learn a single thing about it or its upkeep. Nothing is preventing you from learning about the tools you rely on. Dishonest mechanics will rip off people who don't understand cars in general, they don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 05:32 AM
0

Man's obsession with women, and his desire to attract them, inspires him to take risks and accomplish great things. Even young boys feel this, when girls are present the boys start showing off. These desires are not only a catalyst for personal growth, they've helped the entirety of humanity progress. If a significant portion of men gave up on women, it'd negatively impact our species. Not only would our birth rates decline, but I also think that advancement and achievement would slow as well (f…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 08:38 AM
1

What made you think I was exclusively referring to income?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:10 AM
1

You're the only person making that assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:09 AM
1

What? You asked me a question about society, then shrunk the scale down to my personal household in your response.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:08 AM
1

It's the only argument that's relevant to this discussion, considering the original commenter was talking about the likelihood of a man's wife leaving him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 06:38 PM
5

I think this is a false comparison. I addressed it in this comment. Adults should be treated like adults... that’s how you end up with systems that treat people like children. This is what we currently do, we treat people like they are children. People receive significantly more help from the government than they ever have before, it's not even remotely comparable. The average person had more personal responsibility in the past, this is especially true for young adults. Do you disagree with that…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 09:43 AM
5

Yes. I'd prefer to live in a society where... Most people have families and a sense of purpose outside of escapism. As many children as possible have a mother and father, so they grow up to be productive members of society, not antisocial criminals. We don't need to import millions of people to make-up for declining birth rates and are able to maintain social trust. I'd prefer to live in a society where women atleast pretend to embody the divine feminine, because the concept of female perfection…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:23 AM
7

This is what you said: "It served MEN well for thousands of years." Are you not implying that women did not benefit from these arraignments at all? Really? Do women not benefit from living in society? You think they'd be better off not living under any society at all? Of course women benefit from standards that keep society functional. Everyone does, to claim otherwise is absurd. women weren’t mistreated due to the conservative society What the hell is "the society"? You realize that the vast ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:22 AM
4

This is a category error and very silly. These practices aren't as ubiquitous as sexual restrictions and they don't provide as much utility. The overwhelming majority of human societies implemented 'conservative' sexual restrictions, even if they were only enforced socially. This is especially true when it comes to female sexuality. Many societies allowed polygamy, but it was almost exclusively for men who wanted to have multiple wives. Why? Because it keeps society functional. It ensures that a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:04 AM
2

Dude, it's because men's wives would be LEAVING THEM at similar rates! Your wife having a college degree does NOT make her less likely to leave you! do men have better outcomes in family/divorce court if they are the ones who initiate the divorce? How is relevant at all? I don't think you are understanding me. Regardless, I'd think that they probably do have better outcomes, simply because if men initiated the divorce, there is an increased likelihood that it was provoked by something that would…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 06:19 AM
-3

No, it served humanity well. If it didn't, you wouldn't be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 05:53 AM
-1

You don't see how these two things cancel each-other out from the perspective of men? We need to be looking at the likelihood of a divorce initiated by the wife. If the overall rate is lower, but the rate of initiation by women is significantly higher, then the lower overall rate is not of benefit to men. The statistics seem to imply that the reason why divorce rates are lower for college-educated women is because the men in those marriages initiate divorce at lower rates, so it might not even h…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 05:52 AM
6

First of all, he didn't really make this argument. Even if he did, you're missing some important information. College educated women initiate divorce at significantly higher rates. According to the American Sociological Association, 70% of divorces involving an uneducated woman are initiated by her, whereas 90% of divorces involving an educated woman are initiated by her. So if we're analyzing this from the perspective of men, the difference in likelihood of being screwed is small, if not entire…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 05:15 AM
-4

Yeah ok buddy. That must be why it served humanity well for thousands of years.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:58 AM
3

I'd take the immature, unconfident idiot because I can mold them into the perfect wife
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 08:26 AM
5

This notion that older women are less attractive is baseless. Ask most women, and they will tell you that older women are more attractive because we know ourselves and what we want. Attractive to who? Yourself? Why would your opinion or the opinion of other women matter (provided you aren't a lesbian)? Men will find personality traits attractive, sure. However, if we're talking about looks, men will find young women at peak fertility significantly more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 08:25 AM
2

What are you even talking about? They didn't add anything to the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 03:09 AM
1

I've bagged more than you. Guaranteed
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:52 PM
2

The importance of romantic relationships has been insanely overinflated, mostly through media Relationships predate the concept of media.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:09 AM
3

My point was that just because your feelings are hurt doesn't mean the person did anything wrong. I agree with you. However, this is what the comment you replied to stated: some women (just like some men) can be needlessly aggressive with their wording. Calling names, cursing strongly, etc. It is morally wrong to belittle and demean people. If your argument is that people should just take it on the chin and move on when they have been morally wronged, why wouldn't you extend this same logic to o…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:41 PM
-1

Women waste money on sex toys because they’ve been psy-opped into believing that it is possible for them to orgasm. You’re all chasing a high that does not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:23 AM
1

Sex robot > Blow up doll > Banana peel > Women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:54 AM
6

This is just factually inaccurate. Women will record their entire interactions with "creepy" men and then post them on the internet. The guy literally does nothing in so many of these videos. For example, that video where the girl is lifting weights and the guy is also lifting 20 feet away from her, not saying a word. The entire time she's mumbling to herself about how he's a "feral animal". Then she appears to be struggling with some weights so he asks if she needs help. She says no and he walk…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:54 AM
8

"Its okay if people hurt our feelings?" is a summary of what the other commenter said. It's not a strawman, they argued that it's ok for someone to dislike you aslong as they aren't actively oppressing you. the lying little scuzz bucket someone, who would lie and manipulate sex out of someone, is. The autonomy is the issue for you, not the way she says it. It’s that you hear “no” at all… gross. This is interesting. You seem to think this behavior is unique to men. It's not. Women lie all the tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:47 AM
2

I support taking voting rights away from the average white male too. I don't know why you're projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 07:27 AM
2

But it's not a contract, and you're not signing anything. The contract is a metaphor. Registering with the Selective Service is an enforceable legal obligation that comes with a duty to serve (if you are selected). Signing a contract is an enforceable legal obligation that comes with the duties of whatever you agreed to. Personally, I don't even think it's necessary... I agree it's not necessary; however, the contract metaphor still applies. It's an implicit social contract. you haven't lost any…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:38 AM
1

Fair winds and following seas
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:19 AM
1

How is it not a forfeiture of your bodily autonomy? If I coerced you into a signing a contract that stated I can make you my slave at any time, am I not forcing you to forfeit your bodily autonomy? Even if I never utilize the contract and don't make you my slave, you're still relinquishing your ability to choose what you do with your own life/body. You no longer have agency, I forcefully took it from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 07:51 PM
1

No, there aren't reliable biological markers. Stop making shit up. This article doesn't even claim that there are. The science is obviously changed... When I say "the science hasn't changed", I mean that most of the claims made by psychiatry are unfalsifiable. Sure, it has changed its stance on multiple occasions (e.g. the classification of homosexuality as a disorder, lobotomies, etc). That doesn't change the fact that they still make and support unfalsifiable claims. There isn't even agreement…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 06:59 PM
1

How are those two concepts even remotely related?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:48 AM
3

If you can vote, you have political power. Do you disagree with the analogy I provided? thats the argument that people are making draft = voting rights I don't think I've ever heard anyone make this argument. I've heard people make the argument I described above: that it is unequal. Men have the right to vote and are subject to the draft, which is a duty. Women have the right to vote, and no duty to serve anyone but themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:21 AM
3

Because soldiering is not inherently linked to voting rights. What are you even talking about? Nobody is arguing that soldiering is "inherently linked" to voting rights. I was arguing against your claim that the right to vote (political power) and military service were not related in any way throughout history, because that is simply false. Strawman. VOTING RIGHTS. not pollical power This is not a strawman. The "inherently linked" statement you made above this is a strawman. The right to vote is…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:31 AM
15

Voting rights are absolutely a form of political power.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:15 AM
2

Thank you for your service, sailor. God bless the Navy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 06:23 AM
12

It's also stupid because there hasn't been a draft in about 50 years (if you're in America). You're missing the point. Men are still forced to register, which is a forfeiture of their own bodily autonomy. When you sign-up for the Selective Service, you're essentially saying "the government owns my body and/or life and can take it away from me at any time"... And you don't even have a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 06:18 AM
12

Draft/voting rights have been linked as recently as the 70s Political power and military service have been linked for a significant portion of human history. I realize that this is an expansion of the definition; however, think it's important to note that this concept is ancient.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 06:09 AM
5

But who excluded women from the draft in the first place? Also men. The primary reason why women are excluded from the draft is because their biology makes them less effective as infantry. You seem to acknowledge this in the next few sentences, so what even was the point of making this argument? it’s unjust to exclude someone from voting based on what they are biologically prevented from doing Why is it unjust? Because you think it is unjust? Well, I think it is unjust to give people political p…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 06:00 AM
2

"Where is your evidence that god isn't real?"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 05:18 AM
2

No, there aren't any definitive biomarkers for most mental disorders. If there were, they'd be classified as diseases, not disorders. Schizophrenia is somewhat unique, there is a lot of debate right now over whether or not it should be classified as a disease (similar to Alzheimer's) as a result of the biomarkers. However, none of the biomarkers are definitive, they lack reliability across patients. So, are some people misdiagnosed with schizophrenia? Are the biomarkers the result of an unrelate…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 05:00 AM
0

Psychiatry is the name for the medical specialty revolving around the diagnosis and treatment of medical disorders. If you want to get into the history of psychiatry and therapy, we can, because "I don’t expect you know that". Psychotherapy used to be something psychiatrists performed, and was a major aspect of the discipline. The shift in focus happened rather recently. Therapy is still generally viewed as a tool of psychiatry by physicians, because as you stated, therapists and psychologists l…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 10:27 PM
3

You're assuming that nobody likes me because you disagree with my statements? This is unproductive, I replied to your question in good faith. Why don't you address my actual arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:13 PM
0

Why are you asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:08 PM
2

I am absolutely not an anarchist. Are you just using random words? Nothing I said implies that I am an anarchist in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:07 PM
-1

It fundamentally relies on unfalsifiable concepts. How do you define a mental disorder? It's not a tangible concept that you can test for or diagnose. Diagnosis exclusively relies on subjective judgments, not objective biological tests. Most mental disorders are only disorders because society thinks its associated behaviors are abnormal. That's literally it. This is why homosexuality used to be recognized as a disorder by the APA and WHO. They decided to remove it once society stopped viewing ga…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:54 PM
5

Why do women attempt suicide more than men? That means that the average woman is more suicidal than the average male.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:06 PM
-4

I'd argue that it makes things worse most of the time. Talking about your neuroses, in-depth, on a weekly basis doesn't help them go away, it makes them worse. Shouldn't that be common sense? The entirety of psychiatry is a pseudo-scientific grift. It just is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:05 PM
4

Women attempt suicide at significantly higher rates than men. They just aren't as successful when they do attempt it, so the male rate is higher. So all that "mental health care" must be doing them a whole lot of good, right? That's why they attempt suicide at higher rates? Sadly, mental health care doesn't even exist as you describe it. Neurotically obsessing over one's own 'mental health' generally makes things worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 05:54 PM
–

Both men and women are attracted to members of the opposite sex who possess looks and status. That's why so many fantasies for boys involve a lowly commoner going on a hero's journey and winning a beautiful princess's hand in marriage. However, it's just a fantasy. Obviously not everyone can be with a person who is extremely attractive and of high status, especially if they lack those things. So, does this mean men who don't marry a princess are settling? Not really, most men never really viewed…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 07:50 AM
2

You're 'hope pilled'? Perhaps a fan of existentialism? The core of what I meant is that struggle gives us meaning. I think modern luxuries that make our lives easier often make us more depressed. It wouldn't be that way if we stopped channeling this surplus of time/energy into hedonism and our own neuroses.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:15 AM
2

Spending time with your kid ain't work bro
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:21 PM
9

If you're genuinely being screamed at by every guy you date, have you ever considered that maybe you are the problem? Perhaps you're exaggerating? Or you are drawn to abusive men? In my experience, often when something like this occurs, the woman is completely misconstruing the guy's emotional state. Then she invents a false memory where she was "attacked" or mistreated in some way. For example, women saying "are you mad at me? why are you mad at me?" when the guy's just being quiet. If a guy di…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:02 AM
2

Once a month? Do you live in a desert?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:28 AM
5

Unless you're homeschooling your kids, then you don't really spend that much time alone with them. A few years if you send your kids to preschool, 5 years if they start in kindergarten. Once they're in school, you get 8 free hours most days.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:26 AM
1

It looks and sounds exhausting, overstimulating, and constant change. This is how the entire universe is, it's in a constant state of entropy. You can either surrender to the void and be consumed by it, or you can fight back against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:28 AM
10

Welcome to life. The woman in the video needs to get the fuck over it. Imagine living in a society that lacked running water, washing machines, gas/electric stoves, clothing stores, etc. Being a mom would require significantly more work! She wouldn't even have time to think about how hard her life is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:42 AM
1

How do you know that? The study you're referencing doesn't specify what they characterized as "spanking". It hardly provides any information on what they determined to be "physical aggression" at all. Also, why do you add "lol" or "lmafo" after so many comments? Is it a tic?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 06:30 PM
1

Do you think a high five and a spanking are remotely similar. Yes, depending on the context. Athletes slap eachother on the asses all the time. It's used for the same reasons high fives are used: as a way to congratulate someone, say "nice job" or celebrate with them. The point is that it's possible to "hit" someone in a way that isn't aggressive, imposing or violent. You're grouping gentle ass smacking in with acts that are overtly imposing or aggressive, e.g. choking, whipping, etc. They aren'…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 05:25 AM
1

Humans are not naturally a monogamous mate-for-life species. No Great Ape is, so it's rather bizarre that we insist humans are. Virtually no mammal who lives more than 20 years is monogamous mate-for-life. What's "natural" is completely irrelevant. This might shock you, but humans have the ability to override their instincts. Humans' natural social tendencies are likely more similar to what elephants and cetaceans have This entire concept is absurd. Social behaviors and tendencies are the result…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 05:12 AM
6

This comment is a work of art. Spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 04:10 AM
5

They make no effort to ensure that they orgasm. It'd be like if a guy just sat there, didn't move a muscle and then got upset at his girlfriend for not jerking him off right.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 04:03 AM
1

Do you think high fives are violent?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 03:59 AM
1

Sure, but if you're married or sign the VPA and do the swab test at home, you might be stuck paying child support for a kid that isn't yours. This happens all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 03:55 AM
2

What gave you that impression? My usage of the phrase "our women"? This is just how people talk, even women refer to their significant others in this fashion. E.g. "back off bitch, he's mine!"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 03:53 AM
4

This statistic is garbage. The study you're referencing doesn't even make this claim. It specifically says "physical aggression", not "violence". So what are they defining as "physical aggression"? Who knows, they only give a few examples. One of those examples is spanking. Do you think spanking is violent in most cases?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 08:38 AM
0

I disagree with your argument, but agree with the title. I think porn usage is of greater detriment to males because their sex drives are so high. They're nullifying one of the most powerful, transformative forces that they all possess. I think it is morally wrong for a person to waste their potential. I also disagree with you talking about BDSM porn, as if it is common. I think this is a niche fetish, I doubt it is widespread on any of the major porn sites. Most men are not interested in that s…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 07:10 AM
1

If the woman is popular, it's very easy to find some of her paid content for free (uploaded onto websites without the model's permission). So in my opinion, most guys paying for porn are extreme gooners who have already consumed all of a model's content they could find for free. They want more, because more is never enough. I suppose some of them might be against viewing "stolen" content, and think they have a moral obligation to pay the model for her work. However, jerking off to porn is alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 04:27 AM
2

Lesbianism is fetishized and men don't consider women as a threat... Society considers women as less sexually valid than men. Or it's because women cannot reproduce with other women? We evolved to be revolted by our women having sex with other men because it reduces our chances of reproducing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:39 AM
1

I disagree, men need something to fight for. If we were attacked, and men had families they needed to defend, we'd see lots of men signing up. Even in offensive/foreign wars, more men would be willing to fight if they had families they needed to provide for financially. Lots of young men today have no responsibilities, and even if they did, there are better, safer ways to make money (e.g. manual labor). We'd see more men joining the military if the job market was so bad that they had no other op…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 10:31 PM
1

This is just historically inaccurate. Every major advancement in the emancipation of women was pushed for by an extremely small percentage of women and some men. Eventually those concessions were granted by men in positions of authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 05:56 AM
1

Men can't fix it on their own. If you're not married, and don't want to sign the VPA before a paternity test, the mother can block your efforts to have it done. I mean, you haven't consented to being the child's father yet... Why would you be able to force a test? If you are married, then you're automatically assumed to be the father, and might be stuck paying child support even if it is revealed that the child is not yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 05:46 AM
3

It's much higher than 2%.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 05:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter