TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coinclink Archive

View 0 posts and 108 comments by coinclink on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's self-destructive behavior no matter who is doing it. It's becoming apparent that this sub is just filled with whiners who validate other whiners. Has nothing to do with winning men their rights back.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:04 PM
1

Whatever, playing victim isn't going to help.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:27 PM
8

This isn't even about gender, calling someone ugly just makes you a bully. A middle-school-level bully, at that. ​ On another hand though, she is from Nigeria. I wouldn't want to be a woman there.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 05:28 PM
1

You're just spouting a narrative and you're wrong about it. I'm all for men's rights except this argument is dumb and makes this community look bad and I want to end it.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 07:31 PM
1

It's not though lol. You're wrong about a mother's ability to just abandon her child with the father!
/r/MensRights22/04/19 07:26 PM
1

Because a father leaving the mother with full responsibility of the child that is his, and that he should be equally responsible for, is not the same as adoption? Adoptive parents must prove and attest to their ability to be fully responsible in both care and finances in order to adopt the child. The biological parents then lose all right to be involved with that child's life. Adoption is not the same as abandonment and that seems like what you're arguing...
/r/MensRights22/04/19 07:23 PM
1

If a father was given a child from the mother who didn't want it and he then gave it to responsible care because he also did not want it, the same rules would apply to him. It is a form of adoption for derelicts and teenagers who don't know what to do and need responsible people to perform the legal process. It is not the same as abandoning a child. Infants are generally adopted by loving parents quickly, they are not raised through welfare by a single mother for 18 years.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 07:06 PM
1

Women are responsible for child support if they leave the child with the father. Most of the time men just don't pursue it in court. Yes, in rare circumstances, and up to a certain age (which is usually a few days to a few months depending on the state) a woman can leave the child with responsible care, no questions asked. It's not really much different than adoption and I'd prefer that to them tossing it in a dumpster. The rest of your jumbled words are anecdotal so I'm not going to bother resp…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:53 PM
1

Adoption is a legal means and is not the same and you know it. You can stretch and do some mental gymnastics and call it a double standard, but that makes the law wrong. It doesn't make you right in that you should be able to just walk away from your child.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:52 PM
1

You can't abandon your child. When a woman aborts or puts a child up for adoption, she is not walking away from responsibility because the child either doesn't exist or has care. When a man chooses to "not be a father" he is abandoning his child. How do you not see the clear difference?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:18 AM
1

I'm not a white knight, trust me. You should just come out and say you want to be able to force a woman to get an abortion bc that's honestly what it sounds like you're getting at. Child exists and is yours? Your responsibility, period. You should be part of YOUR child's life for god's sake, forget the financial burden altogether.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:57 PM
2

You arguments make zero sense and I wish I could just erase this mindset from men's rights. You don't get to opt out of taking care of your child that exists! A woman getting an abortion is not equal to opting out and she, rightfully, has the last say in that decision! What is so hard to understand about that? Sex isn't a mistake, you having risky, careless sex with someone is. If you tossed a cigarette and accidentally caught a house on fire and killed someone, you'd be held responsible. An acc…
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:14 PM
-1

a child is a massive financial burden on someone and you don't get to just decide you don't want it if it exists. You made the choice and knew the risks when you had sex. You can argue it's a little unfair a woman gets the last word on what to do about pregnancy. But um, that's because it literally and physically affects her more than you. Are you going to sit here straightfaced and tell me that if the roles were reversed you wouldn't want the last say on a tumor growing in your body? It's also …
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:41 AM
0

I never said that the system isn't broken.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:38 AM
-2

But... the child exists? You can't just decide you aren't responsible if the child exists. It's clearly different if the child is aborted or is given away.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:37 AM
0

I disagree. The adoption thing is morally fucked up, I'll agree with that, but financially, the burden of the child is upon the adoptive parents. In the case of abortion, the child doesn't exist. In all other scenarios, the child exists and the father is equally responsible. There's no arguing against that.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:47 AM
5

if he chose to use his stored sperm to have children, one would assume he is willing to take equal responsibility for those children. The point of all this is to be in full control of when to have children instead of leaving it up to chance or someone else.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:24 AM
0

How can people honestly agree with this? If the baby exists, you helped create it and you are equally responsible for it. ​ We can all agree that it's wrong for women to block men out of the lives of their children while still demanding child support. ​ Beyond that, if a child exists that is yours, you have to take care of it... Why should the taxpayer be responsible to cover your half of a careless mistake?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:06 AM
7

Pretty sure it's not hard at all to store your sperm. It might cost something, but surely way less than child support.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:01 AM
15

I mean, what men's rights marches actually exist? If you took the time to organize one and it got mentioned in a news article it would probably show up on google. The fact is that these events don't really exist because men aren't advocating for their own rights in the same way that feminists advocate for women's rights. In the same vein, if you did organize one, would you actually be able to convince anyone to show up? My guess is, probably not. It would be an embarrassing dud of like 10 guys w…
/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:19 PM
-18

Would you be shocked if the cells instead came from a different part of the body? It's just biology.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 03:27 PM
31

Idk, it's honestly kind of interesting. The cells have regenerative properties and are cultured in a dish in a lab. It's no more bizarre than any other medical or biological concept, like stem cells for instance.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 03:20 PM
27

You know they don't take new foreskins for this though, right? The cultured cells they use are from foreskins removed decades ago so it's really not a great argument.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 03:02 PM
2

Contraception? Yes, I'm with you. Child exists and it's yours? Sorry bud, you're equally responsible.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:28 PM
1

I am fine being in a society that provides for children whose parent's can't provide for them. I do think that our current welfare system isn't set up right though. I think there should be more help for all parents, not just those who can't provide. Either way, it's not fair to that system, no matter what form it's in, if the father just walks away. It's as much his child as it is the woman's. If the child exists, he has to be responsible for it equally.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:20 PM
1

I have a Master's from Cornell, yes. So I have proven critical thinking skills that can help me see how policy changes will work out in reality. I can tell you that you shouldn't need an Ivy League education to see how a policy allowing men to abandon their children financially would be an incredibly bad thing that is selfish on the part of the father. Selfish to society, forget the mother altogether.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:10 PM
2

Men should absolutely have rights to their child. Like I opened with, I am all for men's rights. I just think this argument of "i should just be able to abandon my baby because dumb woman can have abortion" makes men's rights look bad. Your baby exists? Your responsibility, period.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:01 PM
2

No, you're just missing the point of what I'm saying because you have a chip on your shoulder. If a woman decides to abort, there is no child and so there is no financial burden. In the opposite scenario, you helped create the child that exists amd you both have to provide for it. Why should everyone else have to provide for it instead of the father? You signing papers saying you don't want the baby doesn't magically make the baby disappear. That's why it's not allowed, and shouldn't be allowed,…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:57 PM
2

I'll admit that's wrong. You can't use major outlying scenarios to disprove my main argument though.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:42 PM
-2

No, I'm not wrong. You're trying to paint women who made the right choice as bad people. They are bringing their baby to "the post office" because they know they can't take care of it. That is putting the baby up for adoption. You are generating scenarios in your head out of a good service that is provided by our government to prevent scared teenagers from throwing their baby in a dumpster. You are an ass.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:36 PM
1

Who takes care of a child that exists other than the mother and the father? Oh right, the state. Sounds very authoritarian if you ask me.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:31 PM
2

Don't call me an idiot because you disagree, just makes you look like an ass. Last I checked, adoption wasn't a bad thing. The link you put up is just the mother making a choice for last minute adoption. That should be encouraged. There are many loving parents who can't have children.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:28 PM
-4

Yeah... and then go to prison. What are you babbling about?
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:22 PM
2

Her body, her choice. It's fucked up in some circumstances, but that's the truth and there's no way around it. If I had a tumor I didn't want in my body and there was an option to get rid of it, I wouldn't listen to anyone else's opinion about it. That shit would be gone. You would do the exact same thing and you know it.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:20 PM
2

There is zero comparison because in one scenario, a child exists. In the other it doesn't. If the child exists, you are responsible for it. End of story.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:13 PM
1

When a child you helped create exists, you're responsible for it. When it doesn't, you aren't. It's simple.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:08 PM
2

My point isn't anything other than that there is zero comparison between a woman deciding to abort vs a man deciding he doesn't want to be responsible for a child. You call me immature but yet every other man in the world would abandon a mistake if they had a legal choice to do so. How "mature" is that? Don't make bad decisions knowing that you are at a disadvantage and then whine about it later.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:05 PM
-6

Nice straw man. A boy who was statutorily raped would not be on the line for child support. No judge would ever rule that way, nonsense for you to bring up, really.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:50 PM
1

You made the choice when you had sex. Oh look, we're full circle.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:47 PM
0

You can have sex without choosing a person that you wouldn't ever want to have a child with.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:45 PM
-1

Stop having sex with anything that moves because you're desperate? That's worked very well for me. The only girls I've slept with are ones I would be fine with raising a child with if an accident happened.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:40 PM
-7

It's also not fair for a man to leave a woman to raise a child on her own when he made a decision to have sex knowing the risks. I would never trust someone else to take their BC. You're making bad decisions if you have gotten a woman pregnant who you don't want a child with. End of story.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:36 PM
-4

It's a choice about a human life. Not about whether you're willing to accept the responsibility of raising a child. They are obviously two very different types of decisions. Don't have sex with women you wouldn't be ok having a child with, it's simple.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:33 PM
0

Laws are sometimes illogical. I don't think a murder of a pregnant woman should be considered a double homicide unless the baby could have lived independently of the mother at the point of the murder.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:24 PM
-13

I'm all for men's rights but this is one of the popular arguments that I disagree with. Here's my take on this. Both men and women make a choice to have sex knowing there is a good chance of pregnancy, even with birth control and condoms. You're kidding yourself if you don't think one missed pill or one accident might happen to you. That is the man's choice, that is when you chose, took on the risk and said "hey this might end up end up in a baby situation" and the woman also makes the same choi…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:19 PM
11

A woman, who is an expert on the subject matter, on the most popular daytime show in America, when mostly women are watching. I don't think it could be a more perfect message.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 04:40 AM
23

What? Judge Judy is literally the best example... She was a family court judge in Manhattan for over ten years.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:37 AM
1

He's probably just latching onto his 15 minutes now and a lawyer probably told him there's money in playing victim. In the immediate post interview (its on TMZ's YouTube, I think) he said that he basically knew she was going to kiss him when he walked up, he was playing dumb afterward.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 02:09 AM
-1

Except that the boy said there was context missing from what aired and that he actually was expecting her to kiss him when he approached.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 01:38 AM
4

There was a post interview with the guy where he said that they cut part of the conversation out. He said he knew she was probably going to kiss him when he went up there and that part of the context was totally missing from what actually aired.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 01:35 AM
1

No you're just arguing in circles and clinging to the same argument that I already clearly explained is false. And yes, doctors obtain consent to use medical waste during any medical procedure. Most people don't give a shit because it's useless rotting garbage if it isn't used for some medical benefit.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 02:35 AM
1

And they have the consent of the parents to use the medical waste from the birth for medical research and procedure, so what is your point? That includes stem cells and everything from the umbilical cord and whatever else is useful. But, for the third time, they aren't used for freaking skin cream! Accept it!
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:13 AM
1

Again, the implication was that someone is profiting off of the fact that newborns are regularly circumsized in the present day. That's not true.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:58 PM
0

The argument was that ongoing profits were being made from harvesting infant foreskins. I pointed out that was false. Whatever other opinions you have on the process is beyond the argument.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:24 PM
0

Just FYI, the facecream thing is bullshit. The foreskins just get thrown out. Yes, the creams do have foreskin cells in them. No, they are not harvested from babies. The companies grow them in the lab from tissue that was collected long ago.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:14 AM
0

And some people make up a lot of nonsense to feel bad about being cut, almost to the point of shaming those who are. It really doesn't matter and i dont give a shit. Never get why some guys do. I guess its fine if we stop doing it to newborns and ban it since there is not really any medical need. But just get real... it literally doesnt matter and i really dont like the uncut look anyway.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:07 AM
1

The only thing that's clear about me from this argument is that I have a better grasp on the reality of the situation and where responsibility lies in an accidental pregnancy. You just refuse to accept that the argument isn't about abortion, it's about accidental pregnancy. All your mind can see is that it's "unfair" that a woman can abort a pregnancy but a man can't.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:57 PM
1

The shame lies not in the decision to abort. The shame lies equally on both parties that created an accidental pregnancy. It's not about societal shame though, it's about consequences. When two parties disagree on how to handle the consequences, that doesn't free one party from the responsibility of the original action and reaction.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:52 PM
1

The decision to abort is a consequence of accidental pregnancy. The decision is irrelevant to the existence of the pregnancy and is, rightfully so, in the hands of the owner and free will of the physical being that holds the child.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:45 PM
1

You're looking at the problem academically. Women have the choice to abort. Not all women will abort though. I don't see how we reach your ideal scenario without requiring women to abort the pregnancy if they can't financially support the child. Adoption isn't a realistic alternative, the reality is foster care. Again, more lowlifes (who will also eventually have accidental pregnancies, regardless of gender) and possible Ted Bundys.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:59 PM
1

I think that you did make a good argument, one that isn't stupid. The thing is though, it only leaves the absolute choice of birth to the mother. The absolute choice of the accidental pregnancy lies on both parties. You can't just say "the mother has to foot the bill if she chooses to birth the child" because that's not how the world works. You can't just leave a child with no support because of the irresponsibility of the parents. Unless... you want more people like Ted Bundy to exist. This was…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:12 PM
1

Women are forced to accept the consequences of an accidental pregnancy, physically and in every other way. You're arguing that men shouldn't be forced to accept any responsibility for an accidental pregnancy and that women should foot the full bill. The fact that you wouldn't be willing to pay for half the abortion cost just shows you don't grasp what the actual irresponsible choice is.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:01 PM
1

Ha! Well, that's another argument I'm not about to get into.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:38 PM
1

The choice of birthing or not birthing the child is not the irresponsible decision. The irresponsible choice of both the man and woman is the act of getting accidentally pregnant in the first place. In 2018, you should know better than to not wrap your dick up even if she is on BC. I'm sure you would be fine with paying for half the abortion cost!
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:36 PM
2

There are a lot of arguments on here that I agree with and I get the spirit this one, but it's just not an equal scenario. In one scenario a child exists, in the other a child was never born. Especially when you look at it from the State / Taxpayer's perspective, who is often the one footing the bill of the missing parent, anyone making this comparison just ends up sounding dumb.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:16 AM
65

It should also be noted that rich and powerful men who treat women like shit, treat everyone like shit. Not only that, the men who sexually harass women are also just bullies in general. We hate these guys too ladies!
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:52 AM
2

That's a great point, I had never considered the sibling aspect. Seems so obvious lol
/r/TheRedPill03/12/17 05:18 AM
1

I think it's a little different when you show that kind of disrespect to an authority figure. If you're so stupid to lay your hands on a police officer, chances are you do belong in jail.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 07:31 PM
2

They were all collectively causing a scene. I'm not taking sides, not even of the cop. That's just how cops operate. You bring negative attention to yourself, they will usually try to fine you.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 07:59 AM
0

How are you gonna say this guy is a "pinner" when he actually is above average in terms of fitness? I wouldn't even say he is skinny, though he certainly isn't ripped, he definitely works out. I think it's far more likely you have some kind of dysmorphia in how you view your own and others' bodies. Girls certainly like ripped guys but, unless you're ugly, this guy's level of fitness is perfectly fine to pick up any woman.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 07:23 AM
1

When cops decide you are causing a scene in a setting like this, they want to nail you for something. Everyone in the scene is a waste of time, cop just wants them all to fuck off but decide if he can fine someone first. Guy's a douche, girl's a drunk, wastes I say!
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 07:13 AM
4

I agree that it's lame she can get away with being physical, but it's the double standard of "if a man did it he'd be in jail" that makes us upset. In reality, unless there are injuries, anyone who presses charges for this level of "assault" is a pussy and wasting the time of the courts, man or woman.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 07:01 AM
10

I agree, women react well to being teased, not to being insulted. There is a clear line between the two.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 06:55 AM
1

Bro put down the thesaurus, you're not fooling anyone
/r/TheRedPill17/11/17 04:33 AM
1

Lol I find it very hard to believe that any woman would ever agree to this. If you aren't just full of shit, you're weird and paranoid and I doubt you have their consent.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/17 04:26 AM
1

You're not considering getting caught in the act though... If a woman catches you recording her without consent during sex, you're in for a shit storm. I think having the voice recorder ready is a good idea, but recording everything by default is going to get you in a lot of trouble some day. It doesn't matter at all what your intentions are, you're gonna be fucked if you're caught. Plus, it is pretty sketchy and morally wrong to record someone during sex without their consent... If you're that …
/r/TheRedPill16/11/17 06:45 PM
27

No, bankruptcy doesn't cover criminal restitution. If she can't pay, she will likely have her wages garnished for the rest of her life. Jail is also a possibility in lieu of payment.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:53 PM
16

Reads as incredibly narcissistic, delusional and insecure to me. Spent a significant amount of time supposedly knocking female colleagues down instead of working on himself. I would bet a boatload of money one of them turned down his advances too. Funny thing is, if any of what he says is true, I would actually classify it as beta behavior. Interesting how many upvotes he has received...
/r/TheRedPill07/10/17 10:35 PM
2

Sounds like you're a little insecure. Somewhere you can start with self improvement.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 08:42 PM
12

Just like /u/blueparka43 said, there are great thoughts in TRP, and I enjoy reading most posts. But most of it is way overboard, exaggerated and unnecessary. It comes down to "be fit, be confident, don't let women control you." Pretty much everything else I read here is drivel.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 04:56 AM
3

That is such a narrow way of looking at small business. At a minimum, the value in a business is experience and employment (perhaps for many) for the time the business exists. Beyond that, it is the only chance for true freedom in the modern world. It's fine to make good money working for others, but you will never be free.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 04:24 PM
2

I don't have a problem with your post in general. I'm disputing the comment that "business is something that young bucks need to get out of their system" which is just a lame, narrow statement that is downright wrong.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 04:19 PM
5

Statistics don't lie friend, small business is half the economy after all. Perhaps you've just figured out that you work better as an individual contributor rather than a creator. That's certainly more likely to me, and there's nothing wrong with that.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 02:57 AM
3

No, I just have it easy because I'm in tech. That being said, the number one mistake I see people make is latching onto one idea and driving it into the ground. What I do is research and development on whatever is relevant. At this point it is a side business, like you mentioned, but it will be a successful business in 3-5 years. Sorry your idea didn't work out for you.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 02:27 AM
9

Business is networking... If you fail at business, you tried to do too much on your own or you didn't work with the right people on the right projects.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 01:11 AM
9

I know, what a laughable statement / excuse of someone who likely failed.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/17 01:07 AM
20

I think the trick would be to dress in drag and claim to be gender fluid during the interview.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:23 PM
2

Actually, the meme game on Instagram is way better than any other platform. I go on there and follow meme pages almost exclusively, funny as hell too! The girls I do follow, I would agree with you though. I'm not sitting there liking their photos though... Actually, it's almost all other women who are giving them attention now that I actually checked.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/17 07:48 PM
2

My dreams are what keep me going. In order for us to not be meaningless when we die, we have to just do things. Existence itself is just us being here because, if we weren't, there would be nothing and that is just boring. To look at it deeper, I guess I'd say that I look at great men, like Ben Franklin to name one, and what they were able to accomplish in their lives. Franklin was so cool because he simply did everything he could and was interested in everything; he was a polymath. Looking deep…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/17 08:46 PM
3

I'm not sure what you mean by "can't wait to die" but just keep in mind what I said. It's your loved ones who suffer when you pass, not you.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 04:58 PM
3

Man, the eulogy is so hard, but I've never felt like more of a man, more proud of myself, than after I held back tears and talked to a crowd of people about my best friend.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 09:18 PM
41

Until it happens to someone close to you, someone you see and talk to every day, you just don't notice; people are constantly dying. Hit me the first time at 24 when my brother was killed instantly in a head-on. Before that, life was always good, but now there's a hole. Then, two years later, at 28 my best friend died of an apparent heart attack, still don't really know exactly why or what happened. People who haven't been through it just don't get it, or they compare it to their grandma that di…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 04:17 PM
13

At the end of the day, most anyone can do this work. Why not hire a person who someone credible working for the company is vouching for? They are putting their credibility on the line by doing so. The alternative is random applicants that no one knows about. It's easy to point out that something is "unfair" but this isn't some political office or position of power. It's not unfair, in fact, it makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 04:08 AM
1

I guarantee that AA will be part of her probation requirements. Usually you get random testing for all drugs, including alcohol. There's always ways around it, but if she gets caught once, she will go to jail.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:44 AM
1

The woman's life is over at this point. She doesn't have another infant to put in danger, and if she did, rights would be taken away. She poses no threat to anyone but herself. Probation means if she fucks up again, she will go to prison. There is no reason to waste taxpayer money in locking her up. Prison should not be seen as punishment, and that's the way you look at it. It should be seen as an institution that separates serious offenders from society, that's it.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:34 PM
2

Thankfully, you aren't entitled to make decisions about defining the law.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:05 AM
1

What does that even mean?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:03 AM
2

but... again... you are literally 100% wrong.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:50 PM
1

You just assume that there is some true justice to be found from a harsher sentence. In reality, your view is why the justice system is so screwed up. The lady didn't go out intending for this to happen; she got a serious charge and a punishment that fit the crime, end of story.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:39 PM
2

except that you are literally wrong by the definition of the law...
/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:34 PM
3

I personally think the punishment is fair for the crime, considering that she wasn't the one driving (I bet the driver is most certainly a felon now). The question is, would a man have received a harsher punishment? Maybe, in fact, probably. That being said, I think that neither she, nor a man who committed the same crime, should be punished further than she was.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 08:19 PM
–

The bitch was let off the hook for making a false report and ruining a guy's life. If she had actually committed a crime while she was drunk, she would not have been let off the hook.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:15 PM
–

Look at it how you want. Drunks aren't let off the hook ever, that's reason enough to not get that drunk. Anything that happens to you, victim or not, is 100% your fault if you get that drunk.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:34 PM
–

Guys, just don't get trashed. Have a few drinks, but never black out. It's stuff like this that will happen to you. It's not fair regardless, but if you don't let yourself get dumb drunk, then this won't ever happen to you.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:51 PM
1

We've been searching for cures to mental illness for a century or more. You're welcome to join the search.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/17 09:27 PM
2

The scenario you described is appalling. But it doesn't describe mental illness. It might encourage your son to do something like cross-dress or play the part of a woman. Yes, it would probably lead to beta behavior too. If that happened though, he could outgrow of all those behaviors or just decide to stop behaving that way on his own. I remember dressing up as a girl at 4, that is totally normal behavior as a small child and is not harmful at all. What it wouldn't do is give him a mental illne…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/17 06:03 AM
24

The reassignment surgery is the treatment. Doctors have found it to be more effective than drugs in relieving much of the anxiety and depression that comes with these gender identity folks. These people literally cannot function as the gender they are born as because of their mental illness. They will lie in bed all day or suffer from constant panics, obsessions, etc. While mutilating their genitals seems crazy, it does allow them to function. It is a harsh, yet effective treatment in those ment…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 09:17 PM
25

Olympics are international, you think Russia would allow that shit?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 09:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter