TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

col0rado Archive

View 0 posts and 116 comments by col0rado on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

except that's not what I was saying at all, and I've already stated that it was both our faults for miscommunication, and I even said that we were talking at each other, like thelordpsy said. What did I get in return though? insults. Classy.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:09 AM
0

I wasn't talking about rape from the start. She replied to MY initial comment. Again, it was both our faults for misinterpreting the other. And again, she's allowed to completely ignore my words when I said I wasn't talking about rape, but I'm the asshole for misinterpreting her, to think that since she was talking to me, and I wasn't talking about rape, that she must have also not been talking about rape? No, it doesn't work like that. You can't blame me for shit, and if that's what you're doin…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:03 AM
0

I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:55 PM
0

And I made it clear that I wasn't talking about instances of rape, or even attempted rape, or sexual assault. But it's okay for her to ignore that, but I'm the asshole for not completely grasping that she was talking about rape? Yeah, that's not how things work. I said we were both to blame for the miscommunication, and we are.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:54 PM
0

I don't either, that's the fucking thing. I've said I wasn't talking about rape, I even said that I was wrong for assuming that they weren't talking about rape too, and I've said that because of that, we were simply talking at each other and not to each other. I don't know what the fuck the problem is.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:54 PM
-1

The original comment was simply "Bit rich" And of COURSE the same standards apply to men and women, I never once said otherwise. We're officially done, enjoy the rest of your day. also, again, nice ninja edit on this comment. The original didn't have the entire last paragraph, especially considering I'm not biased against mensrights at all. That's something that you made up.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:12 PM
-1

Nice ninja edit there. I've said before and I'll say it again, we both thought the other person was talking about something they were not. That is both our faults, but you insist that it's not, and that you've been crystal clear this whole time. I've explained to you on numerous occasions that I was not speaking in terms of rape, and I assumed you were too. That is my fault, for not fully understanding you. Your fault is in not fully understanding me. But you've been nothing but petty about this…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:08 PM
-1

You are one petty individual, god damn.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:02 PM
-1

Except that's not what I meant at all. It's an excuse often used by insecure people to not tell their partners that they don't trust them to not fool around on them. Thanks for calling in the downvote brigade. Class act by you.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 03:53 PM
-2

Stop acting like middle school children who are afraid of catching each other's cooties, and maybe you'd get people actually willing to fucking contribute. Instead you're caught up either trying to show how ridiculous other subreddits are (doing so in a fucking ridiculous, hypocritical way), or you're just circle jerking because women and feminists don't take you seriously. Maybe if you ignored those people, instead of engaging in some fucking middle school bullshit, you wouldn't look quite so s…
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:25 PM
3

Look, you assholes (r/mensrights and r/feminisms) do the same shit to each other all the time. You create subreddits to showcase the censorship in r/feminisms, they create a subreddit to highlight the inane shit some of you say. It's tit for fucking tat, grow the fuck up, both of you. Yeah, you're ideologically opposed, but I highly doubt any of you are still in fucking middleschool, so how about not acting like you are? That's not just directed at you guys here, that's directed at the lurkers f…
/r/MensRights18/08/11 04:58 PM
0

Fuck off, you inbred hillbilly fuck. Go back to stormfront.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:30 PM
1

Go fuck yourself, you racist, homophobic, anti-semitic shithead. Also, thanks for banning me from rights4men, I would never set foot in that fucking gutter trash shithole, so you did me a favour. Now fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:29 PM
5

Oh hey, it's the neo-nazi/white supremacist/white "nationalist" scum fuck ss_camaro. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 08:40 PM
3

So, let me get this straight... You do a piss poor job at explaining yourself and your position, so automatically it's everyone else's fault for not understanding you? Shut up.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:07 PM
0

To you it may not be nonsense, but to me it is. We simply have different outlooks on the subject, and the evidence that I'm sure you have to back up your viewpoint, to me is utter horseshit. Not trying to be disrespectful, but that's just the fact of it. Your John Smith scenario happens for people who have been raped, don't get it twisted, don't say that it doesn't, because it does. You go to the hospital and you say you were raped, they're going to believe you. Just because a police officer com…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 05:20 PM
-1

So, someone being a good samaritan is a white knight now?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 02:30 PM
11

It's just a simple notion, however misguided, that rape victims are infallible. They want to believe that as a society, we don't believe the victim, thus the whole "rape culture" nonsense, and "victim blaming" nonsense you get when you actually want to dig deeper into the facts of the case. They would prefer if, as a society, the claims of rape victims are taken at face value to be the absolute truth, and that it is up to the accused to prove otherwise. Essentially, you're guilty until proven in…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 02:06 PM
1

Because I linked to the news report that actually had the details of what he did. Now kindly take every man's dick out of your mouth, you don't need to felate them all.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 09:22 PM
1

You're just as bad as the feminists you're so against, making up any excuse at all to explain away this man's actions. He fucked up, deal with it.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 08:13 PM
1

How you doing?
/r/MensRights03/07/11 02:48 PM
20

Well, her problem is that she believes in rape culture, "I operate on a feminist understanding of rape culture" is what she said, which is just bullshit to begin with. So, and this isn't a knock against feminists or me supporting rape, but society fucking hates rape and despises rapists, to the point that a lot of men never live down rape accusations. That's how POWERFUL a rape claim is, that even if it's false, it'll still fuck your life up. So, rape culture? Bullshit. Anyone who comes out and …
/r/MensRights03/07/11 02:38 PM
1

SPOUSAL ABUSE CAN BE AGAINST A MAN OR A WOMAN. You dumbass. All the fighters in the UFC are male, and presumably straight, so they all probably have wives. That doesn't mean that it's a sexist policy, simply because all the spouses of their fighters happen to be female. If any of them were men, they'd still be fired. IF THE EXACT SCENARIO HAPPENED TO A MAN, THE FIGHTER WOULD STILL BE FIRED. HOW IS THIS NOT GETTING THROUGH TO YOU? Fuck you're dumb.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 12:26 AM
1

They're not, you're just a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 11:12 PM
1

... shut the fuck up. I answered your question given the facts. If you want to ask "if he did that to another guy at a bar, would he have been fired?" That wouldn't be the same scenario. Given the same scenario, if the only thing that was different is that he did it to a man (who would have to be his spouse) then he would still be fired. You want to be outraged that a man lost his job, that's all on you. He deserved what he got, and it was his own fault.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 11:08 PM
1

If he choked out and beat another man in front of their daughter, yeah, he'd be fired. Dana almost fired Tito Ortiz when he was arrested because of spousal abuse allegations from Jenna Jameson. The only thing that saved Tito was the fact that the police decided to not press charges and Jenna reconciled with him like the next day. Dana white has a zero tolerance policy towards spousal abuse. So yeah, if he did that to his male husband, he'd be fired. Because let's be honest, the facts are as foll…
/r/MensRights01/07/11 06:23 PM
1

No, no it wasn't. He beat her, it wasn't self defense. Maybe the first punch was, but everything after that was an attack. He did it in front of their daughter, too, who tried to get in between them to stop the attack. He fucked his own career up.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 02:44 PM
2

He punched her repeatedly, choked her until she blacked out, and knocked out one of her teeth. He's being charged with felonies, not misdemeanours. He ruined his own career.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 01:41 PM
5

No shit. But it's like 2x and feminisms here sometimes, except instead of the female being right all the time, it's the male. She apparently punched him first, but then he punched her REPEATEDLY, knocked a tooth out, and choked her until she BLACKED OUT. All while their DAUGHTER tried to intervene to get him to stop. Anyone who doesn't think he deserved to be fired is just being stupid, and blindly believing that a man got screwed. He screwed himself, Zuffa didn't, he did. Blame him for his own …
/r/MensRights01/07/11 01:37 PM
5

When I started calling out those neo-nazi fucks for their blatant anti-semitism here, their blatant racism, and blatant homophobia, more than a few of you actually came to their defense. You actually tried to say that white nationalism is different, and ACCEPTABLE, compared to white supremacism. Now you're just starting to see them for their true colors though?
/r/MensRights01/07/11 01:27 PM
2

Apparently he also choked her, and knocked one of her teeth out, and repeatedly punched her. Not sure he can legitimately claim self defense for all of that.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 01:25 PM
2

Strikeforce fighter.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 01:23 PM
1

So what you're saying is, you openly tolerate racism, and you're in no way opposed to people spewing it in your subreddit. Good to know.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:14 PM
1

He's a racist, he's a homophobe, he's a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 12:45 PM
1

No, fuck these racists. They shouldn't be accomodated, they shouldn't be humoured with "polite discussion" that only enables them to spew their hatred. These fuckers don't deserve anything but contempt, and I'm not going to sit idly by while people passively enable them. If you want anti-semitism here, if you want white supremacy here (under the guise of "white nationalists") then you're being no better than they are. Every time someone engages them, they just spew more hatred, so fuck them.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 12:43 PM
-2

Look at their comment history. They're white supremacists, they post in subreddits like r/niggers, they're rampant homophobes, they're anti-semites, they're racists. Fuck you. And fuck this subreddit if people like you are going to accomodate them and make excuses for their behaviour by saying shit like "they're not white supremacists, they're nationalists, they're ethnocentrists" Fuck you. [edit:] If your views and attitudes are held by the majority of people here, then your movement is doomed.…
/r/MensRights27/06/11 11:12 PM
-2

Right now, you have an influx of white supremacists who really are trying to push their views in this subreddit, and no one seems to care. So either something needs to be done about it, or I hope you enjoy being surrounded by white supremacists, who will make the men's rights movement look like a racist, angry mob of white males. I, personally, do not want a damned thing to do with them, and passively letting these shitheads submit links and spout off their anti-semitic, racist, homophobic bulls…
/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:28 PM
2

Take your fucking anti-Semitic bullshit and fuck off already, you stupid, pig-headed motherfucker.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:23 PM
7

I'd rather not let a pigheaded fuck up like you actually have a platform to spout your hatred and bullshit. Fuck you, I hope your children marry outside their race.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 02:48 AM
7

Fuck off and go back to stormfront, you inbred hillbilly fuck.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 10:44 PM
-10

It's very necessary, unless you're only concerned with the rights of straight white males, in which case you need to take your ass back to stormfront.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 10:41 PM
16

I love how you jumped to the conclusion that because I completely despise white supremacists, and even those who are too chicken shit to call themselves white supremacists so they label themselves "white nationalists", that I don't think white people should have rights. Every person should have rights, the difference between someone like you, and someone like me is, I view people as equals. I don't think that just because I was born of a certain race, that I'm somehow better than everyone else, …
/r/MensRights26/06/11 08:31 PM
4

The only thing neo-nazis, and white nationalists care about is the rights of straight, white men. There are a number of gay MRAs, there are a number of non-white MRAs, and they don't give a shit about them. The fact that redfel, whose comment history is riddled with homophobia, comments where he says shit like "I didn't have to read the article to know he was black" in a rape thread, get upvoted here is disgusting. Most people want NO PART of people like that. Most people do not want to be assoc…
/r/MensRights26/06/11 06:43 PM
0

Right, because being opposed to racism and homophobia, directed towards a racist homophobe is trolling. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 01:43 PM
1

Well, if your comment history weren't riddle with overtly racist comments, blatant homophobia, then maybe we could actually have a discussion. As it stands, we can't. Why? Because I find you, and people like you, to be reprehensible. I find your beliefs to be atrocious, and disgusting. I believe people like you do not deserve the time of day to spout off your beliefs, and that's all that would happen if we were to "debate." So, kindly go fuck yourself, go back to stormfront, go talk to the peopl…
/r/MensRights26/06/11 01:23 PM
5

So is a lot of the upvoting.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 01:14 PM
1

No, you're simply a racist, homophobic piece of shit. There's no debating with gutter fucking trash like you. Look at your fucking comment history, it's nothing but racism, homophobia, and other bullshit you're trying to pass off as "white nationalism"
/r/MensRights26/06/11 01:11 PM
3

Again, you racist, homophobic piece of shit, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 01:07 PM
20

I'm seriously appalled at the responses in this thread. The fact that any of you would defend this horseshit, and that you would even attempt to make a distinction between white supremacy and "white nationalism" is disgusting. You're doing nothing but hurting your cause by shrugging your shoulders and going "but they're trying to help men" when really, they're only concerned about helping white, straight men. This shit is racist, and there are quite a number of you who are trying to defend it? F…
/r/MensRights26/06/11 01:06 PM
6

I see from your comment history that you're basically a white supremacist in disguise. Oh, I'm sorry, a white nationalist. Go fuck yourself, you racist, homophobic piece of shit.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:53 PM
4

except you can't honestly say that when the publisher is from a neo-nazi website such as stormfront, that it's anything but white supremacism. The whole notion that white nationalism doesn't equal white supremacism is complete and utter bullshit. The people behind it are racists, they're white supremacists, and they can dress it up as white nationalism all day long, that doesn't change a damned thing. Unless you're fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:39 PM
13

neo-nazi's need to fuck off and die.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:11 PM
3

What are you, some kind of fucking neo-nazi sympathizer?
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:11 PM
1

I've had my share of run-ins with feminists, I used to identify as one until pretty much all of my feminists friends turned on me because I thought rape culture was nonsense. But, this bookstore closing has nothing to do with feminism, and everything to do with the owners simply not being able to change with the times, or their inability to change fast enough. It seems the link was submitted to be spiteful though, and I understand that a lot of people here simply do not like feminism, but this w…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 01:03 PM
1

Most of the independent bookstores in my neck of the woods are also used bookstores. That little distinction has saved a lot of them, and one of them, that has the best name brand/recognition in the city, has also opened up another location. This bookstore closing has nothing to do with feminism, but just the owners not being able to navigate the current landscape of their chosen industry. Without loyalty from your customers, your bookstore will struggle. Every day, you see more people with kind…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:59 PM
5

Any independent bookstore is going to struggle without a very loyal customer base. Ebooks are outselling, or almost outselling physical copies these days, so without a loyal customer base who actually want to pick up physical copies rather than a kindle or ipad, they're going to struggle. Though, I have no idea why this was posted here, are the people here supposed to say "feminists? of course, they can't run a business!" I don't get it.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 02:11 AM
9

I know I'm going to get shit on for saying this, but the Palin's remind me of a certain side of my own family, so I'm gonna say this. Just because the matriarch of the family has delusions of grandeur, doesn't mean you've successfully overcome your white trash upbringing. In areas where there's fuck all to do as a teen, you're going to get fucked up, either with drugs or with alcohol, and you're going to get fucked, because there's nothing else for teens to do. As for the rape allegation though,…
/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:18 PM
3

I can write my name in the snow without the use of a stencil.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 03:05 PM
7

I'm surprised that no one caught on that it was a reference from Chappelle's show. I haven't watched the show in probably 5 years, but when I saw that image, I instantly heard her saying "FUCK THAT! I don't like people playin on my phone!" She just had to keep it real.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 01:38 PM
4

It's a Chappelle's Show reference, it's not racist. ... I'll spoil the joke if you want.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 11:54 AM
6

It's a Chappelle's Show reference, it's not racist.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 11:54 AM
11

Right off the bat, they're assuming that every rape that's reported actually happened. Then, they're also assuming that every person they arrest, is actually guilty and it's the courts who aren't doing their job. I don't know the stats and all that, but those are huge assumptions they're making.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 10:27 PM
10

So is murder not as bad as it used to be? A crime is a crime is a crime, some aren't as bad as others, but theft today is just as bad as theft 15 years ago. Rape today is just as bad as it's always been.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 08:04 PM
3

Scott Adams is a bad troll. He thinks that he's sitting there playing social experiments on everyone for his "intellectual curiosity" when really, he's just a bad troll. I can't find the image right now, but he really does sit there spouting stupid nonsense, and when people call him out/comment on his stupidity, he pulls that "LOLOLOL!!! I TROLL YOU!!" card. Except in this case it's more of a "LOLOLOL!!! I SOCIAL EXPERIMENT YOU!!" card.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 07:29 PM
5

I'm more concerned with the sign in the background that demonizes all men, and assumes that we're all hell bent on rape until a woman says no. Anything that a woman or man can do to protect themselves should be encouraged, and that includes keeping yourself out of situations that you know damn well might lead to trouble. You're in control of yourself and your faculties, if you're concerned that something might happen if you drink too much, don't fucking drink too much. You can't rely on other pe…
/r/MensRights15/06/11 03:48 PM
5

There was a link on reddit like, a day or so ago, that said they were both set up because they knew that the US basically had no gold in their reserves anymore, and what they had was fake. I'll be in my bunk, with my tinfoil hat on.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:25 AM
2

If someone specifically sets out to rape, you're probably right. But if someone is in the moment, they're getting hot and bothered, and then the other party says no, to put an end to it, it might help, you never know
/r/MensRights11/06/11 06:29 PM
7

I truly believe the frequency with which rape occurs is wildly disproportionate to the frequenecy with which feminists believe it occurs. Rape would need to be under reported by, probably 10000%+ to match the numbers that so many of them believe to be true. Though I don't blame them outright for holding those beliefs, a lot of them have probably been hearing that since they were children that they just take it as fact. Everyone can stop rape, though. Men can stop rape by simply being informed of…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 05:15 PM
2

Personal responsibility in keeping yourself out of a potentially bad situation (considering that something like 70% of rapes are committed by someone they know) has all but been removed from the equation. The act of rape is 100% the rapists fault, no question, but feminists are trying to remove personal responsibility from the equation, allowing women to do whatever the hell they please even if they're putting themselves at risk. There are things that people can do to lessen the chances that som…
/r/MensRights10/06/11 06:42 PM
3

It's always going to be a hot-button issue for feminists, and it's understandable with how public and prevalent the stories of females being raped are. That's not to say they happen as frequently as they claim, I never bought that 1 in 4 thing for a second, even when I was a teen, but the stories are publicized so much that they believe there's a greater risk than there really is. So, it's going to be a hot-button issue for them simply because of how prevalent it is in the news. Basically, they'…
/r/MensRights10/06/11 01:56 PM
2

Exactly, and the publicity stunts, and the attempts to make every issue an issue about gender, and they simply don't look beyond their already privileged circle of friends and colleagues. They do slut walks because of something a police officer said at a law school, but they do nothing about third world countries. It's publicity stunts and bullshit, instead of actual effort put into making the world a better place.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:11 PM
2

If the hardcore/extreme/radical/whatever feminists were more like the SPCA than like PETA, I doubt any one would care. They're more about publicity stunts and attacking people for the equivalent of "eating meat" than they are concerned about doing actual good. If they were more like the SPCA than PETA, could anyone really say they weren't doing their cause some good? Hypothetically speaking, that is.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 11:20 AM
6

I like an independent woman... in fact, I prefer them. What's there to be intimidated by? Everyone should be independent.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 08:24 PM
3

Honestly? She is a paragon of courage and a symbol of hope. Would YOU want to be a police chief, or even a simple policy officer, in a bordertown in mexico these days? You're asking to be killed, and in the most horrific ways imaginable. I wouldn't wish that job on my worst enemy, and the fact she wanted to try to make a difference there? I'm sorry, even if she's young, even if she's naive, even if she didn't know what she was getting herself into, she doesn't deserve a bit of scorn from anyone …
/r/MensRights08/06/11 06:17 PM
2

It's nothing but white, college educated, middle class/upper middle class white women trying to tell everyone else exactly how the world works. They're nitpicking in order to elevate themselves and marginalize what happened to a man, saying that it's "not the same thing that we women go through, what happened to you was much better, we have it so bad being women.." If you tried pulling that line on one of them, all hell would break loose. If they wanted to be a benefit to the world, they would l…
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:54 PM
1

You are such a dick, Scott. [edit:] no one here is a fan of southpark?
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:52 PM
1

As someone who's broke, that seems like it would be an adventure... but then I realize I'd still be broke over there.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 01:29 PM
2

Well, my point was a little biased to be quite honest. It's a reaction to some shit that happened in my life a few years back, thanks to some former "feminist" friends. It took me awhile, but eventually I saw, well after the fact unfortunately, that they weren't concerned with actually helping people. None of them cared about the world at large and actually trying to make a difference, they just wanted to show everyone how oppressed they thought they all were. So, I'm a little bitter about what …
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:27 PM
3

I wouldn't go that far, because it could be useful if they actually were concerned with global change. To me, feminism in north america is like unions in north america, at one point in time they were definitely needed. They've both achieved so much though, virtually all of their original goals, that in order to stay viable they need to keep creating "problems" that they can then "solve." If feminists actually cared, they would look beyond their white, middle class/upper middle class, privileged …
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:12 PM
10

But it's just such horseshit, you know? Just taking a cursory glance at the news, and you'll see how much hatred people have for rape and rapists, even those who've merely been accused. And just because someone questions the accuser, doesn't mean that they're victim blaming. If I've learned anything over the last few years, it's that hardcore feminists need women to feel like second class citizens, and they need them to be kept in a constant state of fear. It's harmful to them, and it's sad to s…
/r/MensRights01/06/11 05:58 PM
6

Make sure to make daily backups, and keep them in an offsite location. [edit:] To do it on the cheap, I would invest in a RAID set up that you can keep in your office as your main backup, and then buy a HD docking station and a few spare HDs so you can make daily backups to them, pop em out of the docking station, and keep the drives at home. If your safety and security is that important to you, this will probably set you back about $400 (or more, depending on the RAID set up), and about $60 or …
/r/MensRights01/06/11 05:50 PM
18

That's one of the reasons why I think the notion of "rape culture" is absolute horseshit. Society takes rape so seriously, and looks down upon rapists so heavily, that the idea that society in fact "empowers" rapists is beyond absurd. Next to child predators, no criminal is abhorred as much, and looked at with so much disgust as rapists. That's my one major gripe with feminists, this whole rape culture nonsense. It's insulting to everyone.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 05:48 PM
25

Because people assume that a false accusation is something that people can overcome, which to be fair, in most cases it is, just not with Rape. Assault? You can easily live that down and get on with your life. Theft? Same deal. Rape? Rape is so abhorrent to people, and to society, that the stigma lingers. People will recognize your name and your face from TV and newspapers, and they won't think "he was falsely accused", they'll think "there goes that fucking rapist. I hope he gets what's coming …
/r/MensRights01/06/11 04:47 PM
9

I actually think that's kinda cool.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 10:32 PM
9

It's probably because women have historically been seen as the caregivers, so there's an automatic assumption that women will be the better parent.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 10:26 PM
5

It's certainly a double standard at the very least. Everyone's motives should be questioned to find out the truth, whether you're a man or a woman. Sometimes asking a simple question like "what were you doing there?" can gain you valuable insight into just what happened, and how it happened. It's questions like that, however, that some feminists claim is "victim blaming" because they mistakenly believe that questioning someone is an attempt to discredit them.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 02:35 AM
0

So this is them complaining about television shows? I guess that's easier than actually trying to make a difference in the world, and makes everyone feel good when they agree with this bullshit attempt to manufacture outrage.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 06:32 PM
0

Whatever.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 02:19 PM
0

Well, crime in general is under reported, but if you look at the actual numbers of rape that are reported, and the numbers that feminists claim happen, you would need about a thousand or more unreported rapes to happen, for every one that does. I'd believe such a thing like that, but 1) I'm not an idiot, and 2) I don't think society hates women as much as feminists think it does. So, it's intellectually dishonest to claim that rape is as under reported as feminists would like you to believe. I d…
/r/MensRights29/05/11 01:56 PM
0

I said western society, and a good number of feminists would have you believe that rape is absurdly under reported to the point of there being some sort of rape epidemic going on. It's absurd and intellectually dishonest to claim such things.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 01:29 PM
0

All crime is under reported, though. You're right in that not every rape was reported/investigated (probably). But, all violent crime is the same way, all violent crime is under reported. That being said, I do not believe rape is so vastly under reported as to make a claim that there's an epidemic of rape happening in western society. Also, rapes that don't lead to an arrest/trial/sentencing, I would assume that, through due-diligence by the police and investigators, that they didn't get that fa…
/r/MensRights29/05/11 11:38 AM
7

As a former male feminists, I'd like to add that not only are they ignoring the inequality that men face, but that they ignore the inequality that everyone who isn't in their target audience faces, including other women. They tend to prey on their target audience, feeding on the delusion that it's men who are the root cause of all of their problems. They feed the delusion within each other, until it gets to a point where that is all they see. They see prejudice where there is none, privilege whe…
/r/MensRights27/05/11 09:22 PM
9

Arguing with extremists is just a bad idea. They don't want facts, they don't want dissenting opinions, they want sheep who will blindly follow their lead. They want people to respond back with "this can't be said enough!" and "you couldn't be more right." and "THIS!" They don't give a shit about opinions that aren't exactly the same as their own. The extremists even shun the moderates for being a part of the problem. It's all white women from middle class upbringings who have been indoctrinated…
/r/MensRights27/05/11 08:38 PM
2

I would hate to live in a society that didn't believe the victim of a crime, and thankfully I don't live in that kind of society. It's insulting to the police and pretty much men everywhere to claim that rape victims aren't taken seriously by law enforcement. My guess is, in the course of asking questions, you know, to get some insight and get to the bottom of what happened, they think that law enforcement is stepping over some imaginary line. They think that they're not taking rape victims seri…
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:35 PM
3

Look, moderate feminists will listen to you, they may not agree with you, but they'll listen. Radicals/extreme feminsts will not, they'll instead try to silence you, shout you down, insult you, and in some rare cases, actually try to fuck with your life a little bit. They'll do all of that in the name of "fairness" and "safety" and "oppression" when really they just can't stomach that people have a different view of the world than they do. For every pair of eyes in the world, there's a different…
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:17 PM
9

I'm going to be honest with you guys about this. I'm not the biggest fan of this subreddit, for the same reasons I'm not the biggest fan of r/feminisms, because too often you (and they) deal in extremes. But, what this seems to me to be, after a cursory glance, is feminists trying to steal the thunder out from under you. That being said, I'm more comfortable posting here, because you're actually welcoming to differing opinions, and you don't get angry and scream when someone doesn't agree with y…
/r/MensRights22/05/11 07:06 PM
3

From my own personal experiences (I've literally lost friends because I wasn't, I guess, "feminist enough"), they only look at the world in a light that will "prove" their points. It's like anyone, like how republicans won't look at any of the good democrats do/have done, and vice versa, they've chosen to surround themselves with like minded people, and that just feeds their bullshit. They want to view the world as being a horrible place for women, and so that's how they view the world, and they…
/r/MensRights22/05/11 02:48 PM
6

To the most hardcore feminists, there is no such thing as female privilege. They would have you believe that women are poor victims in every sense of the term, and that if they don't fight, women will forever be treated as though we're living in the dark ages. To them, everything, and I do mean everything, is a gender issue, because they'll find "male privilege" in anything. Moderate feminists are a different story, though, but you'll find no moderate feminists in r/feminisms or r/feminism. I've…
/r/MensRights22/05/11 12:57 PM
2

The problem there is, she thinks she's an expert because she's been alive for 20 years and been "studying" for 10 of those. She's a self-professed expert at something she has no right calling herself an expert of.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:00 PM
1

You're seriously an idiot. A very, very insecure, frightened idiot.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:41 PM
0

The whole point of getting that big is to be intimidating? That's news to me, and news to everyone else I'm sure. Stop being an idiot, stop trying to throw all of your insecurities on to other people, stop forcing people with muscles into your bullshit stereotypes, and open your eyes and try to see that people are good. And if you have friends, as you say, that get a bad wrap because of the way they look, why the flying fuck are you being so judgemental towards people, and giving them a bad wrap…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 04:25 PM
1

And I'm saying those people you're calling lunks, are actually incredibly nice and don't deserve to be looked down upon just because their size intimidates you. It's not their fault that you're intimidated by size alone, and refuse to even consider for a single, solitary moment, that they may not fit the bullshit stereotype you're applying to them. [edit:] and, once again, that's on you, not them. It's not their fault that you're so insecure that you can't be around someone who has anything that…
/r/MensRights16/05/11 03:35 PM
2

What logic? You're saying that people with muscles intimidate you, even when they're nothing but nice. That's on you, not them.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 03:28 PM
1

The only problem is, you're an idiot. [edit:] also, it's moot, note mute. If you're gonna pretend to be smarter than you are, don't make such a stupid mistake.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 11:17 AM
1

I have a friend who is like this. He doesn't care one bit about the way he looks, but he just loves to lift weights. It's not exercise to him, it's fun. He's said he just loves knowing that he can lift something heavy, that every time he does more than he did before, either in weight or in reps, it's like a new high score in a video game. He just loves to do it, and he's the nicest guy around, he'll help you out in anything, especially if it has to do with exercise and lifting weights. It's fun …
/r/MensRights15/05/11 03:34 PM
3

It's hard to lift heavy weight and not grunt.. a lot of it really is just the quick exhalation of oxygen. It's like this... you try going from 0-60 in 3 seconds in a car without the tires squealing just a little bit, that's the same principle behind lifting heavy weights. You're going from 0-60 in matter of seconds. And also, just because someone has muscles, doesn't mean they're a douche, or a "drunken frat boy." Most of them, like most people in general, are great people, and will actually HEL…
/r/MensRights15/05/11 03:30 PM
3

There's been a slow takeover of twox by the... I guess more extreme feminists out there. They're loud, and rather than stay and discuss things, or even argue with you, they'll instead shout you down and insult you for disagreeing with their point of view. There are a few, whose names I won't mention, that have basically done their best to shut down any rational discussion, and I do mean rational discussion. It often gets to the point where it becomes a shouting match, and whoever can show the mo…
/r/MensRights14/05/11 09:06 PM
1

Explanations are not indictments though. An explanation for what a person does/did/will do, is not blaming them for what happened to them after the fact. If someone asks me "so did you hear that this 11 year old got shot outside a crack den last night?" And I respond "yeah, I hear they were hanging around with older kids, and they were actually dealing drugs and shit." That is not blame, that's just explaining the scenario, explaining perhaps why it happened, but in no way, shape, or form, blami…
/r/MensRights10/05/11 07:12 PM
1

But no one ever blames the victim. No one ever says "oh, it's her fault for being raped" the same way no one ever blames a murder victim for being murdered, or a robbery victim for being robbed, or an assault victim for being assaulted. That doesn't happen, people may question why that person did this or that, or why they were in a certain part of town, but no one ever blames them for what happened to them. The notion that as a society, we tolerate rape and empower rapists is the most absurd not…
/r/MensRights10/05/11 12:20 PM
8

The whole notion of rape culture is hugely insulting to decent human beings everywhere. I don't know a single person, male or female, that doesn't despise rape and who doesn't vilify rapists, yet the notion persists that we're living in a culture that not only supports rape/rapists, but promotes it and even empowers rapists? Give me a fucking break. No one is "rapist friendly." That's absurd, and incredibly insulting, and even dehumanizing to accuse someone of such a thing.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 07:14 PM
5

And I'm saying what they're complaining about isn't actually what's going on. They think they're being targeted specifically because they're a woman, and that's flat out untrue. They're being targeted because they react, because those saying it, will say anything to anyone in order to get an upper hand. They'll talk shit about your dick size and about you being gay if you're a guy, they're simply looking at it as a gendered attack and that's just not true. It's about trying to get under your ski…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 04:24 PM
7

How often do you play online games? It's populated by males between 13-24, and they treat everyone like shit. They go after weaknesses, or perceived weaknesses, in order to get under your skin. If they say something about your voice, and it pisses you off? They'll talk shit all day long about your voice. If they say something about your mom, and you don't seem to care? They'll move on to something else. If they mention something about you being a girl, and you flip out? Guess what they're going …
/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:52 PM
3

Well, I didn't specifically say just rape or sexual assault, but rather some sort of trauma. I find that trigger warnings are too often used as a safety net, allowing people to remain in their current state while everyone else attempts to cleanse the surroundings of anything even remotely "distasteful", than anything else. It often becomes an excuse to shout others down for being insensitive, which is usually not the case at all, and to just... I guess keep people "safe" when they don't need saf…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 09:34 PM
9

It's because many of them have suffered some sort of trauma, resulting in PTSD (to whatever degree) that they, for whatever reason, aren't getting the proper help for. When simply reading words can set off a panic attack in another person, that person has not received the proper psychiatric help, or hasn't received any help at all, and they should. They should be striving to integrate back into society to a point where things like that won't set them off. It might take a few months, or even year…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 12:31 PM
0

Perpetuating this myth that we live in a rape culture does nothing but shame people into not speaking up. You don't believe in rape culture? You support rape, they'll say. It shuts people up and kills any dissenting opinion. I'm optimistic about society, but, really, being so negative about the world and thinking everyone is out to get you must be so terribly exhausting. You can't sanitize your surroundings and scrub clean everything you disagree with, and everything you disagree with isn't out …
/r/MensRights21/03/11 09:10 PM
2

I suppose, I really don't know. The one thing I find insulting about hardline feminists is that they treat other women as babies, essentially removing any and all guilt from them for their actions, as if they didn't know any better. It's insulting to women to think that they don't have the wherewithal or common sense to know better, so they're never responsible for their actions. No one likes to be treated like a child, but for some reason, that's what some (definitely not all, so don't put thos…
/r/MensRights18/03/11 04:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter