TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coldgears Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by coldgears on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

You don't have to be trapped. People choose to be because of fear of the unknown. Fear that if they pack up and leave they won't find a job. Fear they'll regret their decision. Many people live interesting live on little to no money.
/r/MGTOW02/05/16 12:48 PM
0

There's evidence that you're a douchebag.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:51 PM
1

Yes and no. Force the parent to go through rehab but don't take the child away. My sister was an addict and the only thing that stopped her was her love of her children.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:19 PM
0

Did you even read the article? It clearly explains this.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:18 PM
-6

A safe space for women to go where they aren't at risk of having their child taken away from CPS.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:13 PM
2

ITT: Suburbanites who don't know what being an addict really entails and gets information from TV shows.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:12 PM
1

Dud you got some serious balls admitting I was right. I appreciate it bro. You gained some serious respect in my book.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:17 AM
1

Its a rape case bro. They aren't gonna bring in experts. Most of these clains were probably never even brought to trial. You grossly over inflate the effectiveness of our criminal justice system. Some little kid stole my motorcycle and crashed it and the local police didnt do shit. Police exist to patrol and stop crimes in progress. Short of murder they don't investigate crimes much, and even 25% of murders go unsolved. Probably close to 80-90% for drive bys and random acts of violence. Prosecut…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:04 AM
3

Exactly. Thats why I said it was a fair middle ground. Thank you.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:40 PM
2

The article says they would have sooner, but this is the first rape claim they could conclusively prove was a lie through CCTV footage. I think that's a fair middle ground.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:12 PM
2

Pssssst. This is a made up story.
/r/MGTOW27/02/16 12:20 AM
1

No, it was a mutually agreed upon decision. And it works both ways. House husbands make the same sacrifice. Should they not get alimony?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:29 PM
1

If you're only goal in life is to amass the most money as possible then yeah. Being able to grow up with your kids rather than work 9-5 is probably something most women would rather do.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 05:46 AM
1

I live in FL. It is here.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 05:43 AM
2

No... To be honest... You're right, that's shitty.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:59 AM
2

No, but when an employer sees your last job was 20 years ago as a cashier it doesn't make a difference. They hate gaps.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:11 AM
-6

Than you miss the value a housewife/husband provides. It cost more to keep a child in daycare than the majority of Americans make in a year before taxes. Wh is a financially viable solution, but provides the wife no benefits for herself or any experience.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:14 PM
1

No they wouldn't. I personally know a stay at home dad. Ex military too. Hard working guy. Nobody ever says a bad word, they know with the cost of daycare being what it is, he saves more than he would make out in the workforce.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:48 PM
1

Alimony is already a case by case basis decided by a judge. I think this is what divorce lawyers and the legal system would have to argue.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:56 PM
18

Yes, I agree with this. Alimony should be paid if the husband is a house husband.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:54 PM
33

I think alimony is fair if the wife played the role of a housewife. You would put women with no skills, no resume, and has never paid into Social Secruity out into the world with no funds. The problem I have with alimony is when both parties are bringing in income.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 06:57 PM
-3

You are, because the PDF which outlines there goals beforehand has 3 paragraphs explaining they are not trying to discriminate
/r/MensRights20/12/15 08:51 PM
-7

It looks like that virginia campaign is not doing anything for wrong. Thathe PDF clearly states that they know all men are not rapists. That interview says that they know that the ad was wrong and they are in the works of trying to change it. It was a poor decision, but not out of malice. Edit: Gotta love being downvoted by those who refuse to actually read the sources.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 06:31 PM
0

I think most people would agree. I would too, but she lied about her age and he thought he was having sex with a 16 year old. She presumably lied because she knew he would never have sex with a 14 year old for the aforementioned reasons.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:17 AM
1

To be fair I think if a 45 year old man is fucking anyone younger than 30 is wrong. The legal system doesn't view it that way.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:05 AM
0

Is this a precedent? A women actually raping a minor. Like held and forced down rape, not statutory and them getting a lean sentence. Has this ever happened before?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 07:49 AM
-6

Patty mayonaise. And 99% of the human population woukdnt know about a shitty cartoon from 20 years ago nigha.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 12:15 PM
10

This. There's two sides of every coin. I think the only fair way would to make it a crime to lie, but make it so there has to be definitive proof as in admitting to lying.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 11:22 PM
-23

I hate to say this but she's being decent in her approach. Men generally are the bringers of domestic violence because they are built stringer than women. (More muscle weight per average) In my experience, when women abused their S/O it's usually mental. Just like how women bully. She's willing to help men proportionally to how much domestic violence they recieve. Which is more admirable than most like how breast cancer firms and rape centers completely ignore men.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 03:26 PM
-1

Look, I think these are all valid points. But I highly doubt all of those things happend to you. Not to mention I've never even seen an actual feminist, and if I did I don't know anyone who would be friends with them. I just find this hard to believe... Edit: And I would be just as skeptical of a woken claiming she was sexually assaulted four times in a lifetime as well... Double edit: This guy just happens to have a life experience for every single argument he's trying to make... Seriously read…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:52 AM
1

I get that. But there was no joke. You were furthering your argument with sarcasm. Socialism is an economic philosophy taken by countries that care about there people. Whether or not socialism can be used by shitty countries is irrelevant. Most of those Scandavian countries do what's best for their people. Socialism is the best for people. Giving people short jail time depending on whether they will reoffend is best for people. Those countries are rated in the top 5 for basically everything. Edu…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 07:11 PM
1

...What joke?
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:45 PM
1

That doesn't even make sense as a sentence. If you really wanted you could go with, "Socialism is used by countries who care about their citizens, however some countries who are power hungry will sometimes use it as a means of control." But seeing as the first part of the sentence doesn't rule out the second, and the fact that everything after "however" is irrevelant to the rest what I was saying I'm unsure why I would bother.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:23 PM
2

How about this, "Socialism is used by countries who give a shit about their people's well being". Now you can stop being pedantic.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:39 AM
1

Extreme ends of any political or economic ideology is bad. Communism is bad just as unrestricted capitalism is. Socialism is a less extreme version of what Germany had.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:33 AM
2

It is. Socialist countries care about the people. They get light sentences because they realize that jail time is about rehabilitation not punishment because you're mad. They take the likelihood of you committing more crimes into account when you are punished. Someone who murders the guy "accidently" killed his son by drunk driving should be given a lesser sentence then someone murdering someone for insurance money. That guy has no reason to reoffend, so giving a 5 year jail sentence may seem li…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:03 PM
3

Have you ever had an actual conversation with someone face to face? People do that all the time in conversation... Most people type the way they talk.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:15 AM
21

From what I can tell the poster I not Satire and was a legit posted put up by a college. It wasn't made by SJW's to stop men from raping... It was made by the officials at the college to warn men of the risk.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:12 PM
36

Nobody here claims rape doesn't happen. The only thing claimed is that false rape charges exist.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 01:57 PM
26

Pao never deleted stuff like this anyway. Only when it hit major subreddits like /r/news. When the thing that was deleted was rehosted on /r/undelete or /r/conspiracy she didn't even care.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 01:54 PM
9

Most women are not like that. Just a small subset of insane people on the internet.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:30 PM
6

America: The only place you can be drunk enough to be resposible for drunk driving, but not sober enough to take resposibilities for choosing to have sex with someone.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:10 PM
1

As long as you're not kicking someone off your property for a protected reason (Race, Gender, and Sexuality in some states) they can kick you out for any reason. I've had a friend arrested for trespassing because he refused to leave a bar while wearing a rival team jersey. Parking lots work the same way. Go ahead and loiter in the parking lot in front of a walmart for a few hours, you'll eventually be asked to leave.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:08 AM
1

Walmarts here actually have signs up that say if you're not here to purchase something, you will be arrested for trespassing.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:50 AM
5

I have a friend of mine who had not worked in years. He uses Uber as a way to make quick cash when he needs/wants it. You work when you want. If you don't want to work for two days you don't have to. If you need quick cash, feel free to work 15 hrs straight. From the article this guy seems to use Uber in the same way. Money only when he needs/wants it and not as a way to pay bills someone else is paying for him. In that case, who cares what he does on his time?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:46 PM

Yes, that's my issue with this. He got 450,000 US dollars lump sum. And is entitled to $75,000 a year for life. There's no way he anyone can't live off of that. I'd be living high on a hog! The problem is if a women came back asking for more after this it would be justified to many people. When in reality it is just as greedy no matter the gender.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:02 PM
3

What's the point of college at that point if you're just gonna learn everything through work experience? I'd say it's pretty important...
/r/MensRights17/12/14 11:46 AM
1

It says in the article she contacted the CSA (child support agency) so it's very clear to me that she was going for child support. That's ten years of child support. This happens all the time when people divorce but then that person becomes rich. Especially with football players. Like I said... The problem is that child support should cap out instead of just being a straight percentage.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:33 PM
2

If you have sole custody of kids, the other person who birthed the kids is required to pay child support. This applies to both sexes. Kids are a huge financial strain. And the governments and most people feel both parents should help feed, cloth, and house these kids. These kids are living out on the streets with there mom, and the father wasn't paying child support that he was legally obligated to pay. The 2 million pounds seem excessive, but child support is done as a percentage of your yearly…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 03:52 AM
1

He probably doesn't want custody. If he really wanted them he would have caught in court.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 03:43 AM
1

Well all of them should be changed but boat. We should still continue to call boats "she" as a reminder to all the years women were suppressed into having the male form the default.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 05:02 AM

No local press is gonna pick this story up. Now if it was a women who couldn't vote...
/r/MensRights25/11/14 02:04 AM
0

Just a typing mistake. I was gonna fix up the post a bit but selecting certain bits of text doesn't work very well on my mobile phone.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 09:02 AM

I've never understood why feminist bring up rape as one of the reason they are a feminist. Being raped is not something mutually exclusive to women. Not being able to go see a therapist, the police, or talk to family members about being raped for fear of being laughed at? I'd argue that's an issue that only men have to deal with. I really hope you eventually find someone whom you can talk with about your issue. It's a shame, rape can really mess with the mind of all human beings -- man or women.…
/r/MensRights23/11/14 08:22 AM

Yep. It's funny. If these men had been under 10 she would have been convicted. It's only once a male hits puberty that suddenly men "wanted it". This isn't a case of women getting a lesser charge. (they always get lesser charges no matter what). This is very simply a case of people thinking that all men want sex and are asking for it.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 02:25 AM
13

That's not a bad idea for things like theft. In America you can get put in jail for the rest of the life because it's your third time stealing a $100 jacket. That shouldn't apply to any type of violent crime though. Right idea, bad implementation.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:28 PM

Not true actually. Many, many murder cases happen each year where a person is convicted strictly on circumstantial evidence and/or testimony. Whether they were imprisoned correctly is up in the air. I'd say quite a few are innocent. The main difference is that with murder you need a dead body to prove a crime was committed in the first place. You can easily blame someone for a crime that they didn't commit. But you can't just say, "I think that guy is a murderer". Without a person being dead the…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:50 AM
1

If it was flipped and the industry was 10 girls to one guy men would be dying to get into that industry.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:41 AM
6

There's more than 10 women in the industry. I'm sure there's 10 black people who if the people with guns were black males would've claimed it was, "casual racism". When you have an industry of thousands of people finding 10 who agree with something is not an impressive notion.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter