TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

colmwhelan Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by colmwhelan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
30

Just one more reason to silently not hire women
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:57 PM
3

I don't believe a word of this.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:25 PM
2

Media outlets etc. should be disallowed from publishing anything like this before it's proven. People who make accusations through any channel other than legal ones should be punished. That would stop all the messing. Imagine if we applied the same standards to robbery as we do do sexual crime. None of this, by the way, is meant to take away from how victims of sexual crime are often treated while in court i.e. pretty badly, depending on your jurisdiction, of course. That problem, also, needs to…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:20 PM
2

Well that's a ridiculous premise! The vast majority of people, male or female, left or right etc. are mostly silent yet they're still living their lives day to day and affecting the world. If politicians adopted your view no-one would ever get elected. That silent majority of women are spending a huge amount of time with men and can swing either way. A reasonable feminist voice may be exactly what's required to keep them from stepping into third wave ideology. ​ Also, fuck your username.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 11:09 AM
1

I don't think you can characterise this as a false accusation - just an unproven one.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:53 AM
3

far left literal commies, socialists and anarchists they're not her audience though. Her audience is the silent majority of women who are on the fence.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:26 AM
6

So, you're a sane person! Nice!!
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:14 AM
7

I'm not being aggressive; my rebuttal of your arguments is not ideological. I don't subscribe to any ideology other than the pursuit of truth (i.e. facts\science\research) and my rebuttal comes from that perspective; I partially agreed with you on veterans, the part I disagreed with has nothing to do with the legislature; I never said that men were as open with their feelings - perhaps try reading what I said again. You seem to be reacting emotionally to being challenged. When you do so it cloud…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:04 AM
14

That's BS. No it's not. The way veterans and men as a whole are treated legally is predominantly is the fault of legislators. Yes when it comes to veterans healthcare, pensions etc. a resounding NO when we look at how they're treated by society - greater than 50% of whom are women. Women are equally responsible for electing those legislators There absolutely are patterns of toxic masculinity that lead to high male suicide rates. No, there are not. Women attempt suicide a slightly HIGHER rate tha…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:20 PM
18

The legislators are not the ones peddling an anti-male narrative. That's coming from academia, mostly, echoed in the mainstream media. "Toxic masculinity" is a loaded, political phrase, designed to undermine men and masculinity. There are certainly men who engage in toxic behaviours - but associating those behaviours with masculinity is unfair, unjust, inaccurate and generally anti-male. WORDS MATTER.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 09:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter