TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

colonize_mars2023 Archive

View 0 posts and 96 comments by colonize_mars2023 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

45-55 To be fair, male interest in your listed bracket (45-55) is fraction of what women receive in their prime dating years (20-3x). So that alone may be great difference maker
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 03:26 PM
4

Yeah, sure buddy. Liberal scholars have been making it up for last 30 years as some sort of a prank. https://news.ubc.ca/2012/01/23/monogamy-reduces-major-social-problems-of-polygamist-cultures/ (that was sarcasm, by the way. Apparently I have to state it these days)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 12:08 AM
1

You don’t earn rights, they are called human rights for a reason And that reason is ... wealth & stability of the human civilization since 1950ish, which lead to universally accepted respect of fellow humans, codified in set of laws called human rights. Remove the stability or wealth and watch the "human rights" disappear quicker than snow in summer. And I kid you not - society with a lot of lonely men without perspective is anything but stable. Just look at the middle east, or human history in …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 11:26 PM
2

is totally reasonable and not at all unrealistic and, sadly, empirical evidence proves them right. There's always a man to suck up to these women. Until the male half of the population gets back some dignity, I fear the dating market will remain the hellhole it is now
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 01:36 PM
2

you spelled "funny" wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 08:13 PM
1

I think this age definitely proved that while women are more relationships-oriented in general, men are way more romance-oriented then women will ever be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:12 PM
1

I do see men becoming less keen on having relationships, but I think that’s a good thing. If you think this is a good idea, you have been a very bad student of history. Like, you're in for a surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 09:27 PM
1

Are you surprised? Social contract for men was broken beyong f*ing oblivion these past 25 years. Same as everyone - why should they continue to support society that doesn't benefit them? Women stopped 70 years ago. It feels like it's men's turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 09:20 PM
3

Now this is a good info here since you can compare both: How unhinged? And does the unhingeness differ between the sexes in any way?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 03:50 PM
2

Blah blah "men don't put effort" argument. Men did not change completely within one generation. So if you, statistically: 1. had previous generation of men who put average/usual effort into relationships, and absolute majority of them formed families have a generation of men that does similar or same effort, and you suddenly have SIGNIFICANT portion of men's population not forming families ... then no, sorry, it's not fault of "men putting any effort". Something else changed, and you know very w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 08:16 PM
3

"Why aren’t we as harsh on promiscuous men as promiscuous women?" What? We are harsh on them. I mean, I am, not sure about you
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 06:39 PM
1

Tinder, OKcupid etc data show that is still orders of magnitue higher than what men get. But not endless, true. Anyway, I would be definitely more OK with overwhelming attention than no attention at all. That's not even an argument. Imagine the same situation, but in a non-sexual context... Job offers, for example? Getting harassed by headhunters would be annoying, sure. But still better than the alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 07:36 PM
1

Sigh. This is nitpicking at best. It's not like men demand only ONS - quite the opposite, actually. Some sure do, but then again, some % will always be morons, statistically speaking. Generally speaking, the advantage in having plentiful options is certainly worth the disadvantage in today's world
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 07:17 PM
1

It is, however, a privilege to have a steady supply of potential partners and minimize the chance of involuntary loneliness in life, is it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 10:49 AM
1

Makes me laugh. Two different wordings, same meaning if we want to get to core of it. But the bottom line is - if the OP wrote "the attention is overwhelming", I'd have to agree because yes, it's likely true. But pretending that the attention is not a privilege/advantage, and acting like it's somehow insulting to call it that? Well, that's just where the moral high horse falls to the ground
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 06:33 PM
–

"Oh noes, I got randomly assigned a gender at birth that makes me desirable, woe is me" Jesus ... talk about privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 05:26 PM
6

Because women can have boyfriends if they want...? Duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 01:17 PM
3

You're way too young - 18 and likely skinny AF at 6'4 unless you're naturally buff or go to gym. Women do prefer older guys and stronger builds. But yeah in men it's always personality>>>looks. Women have it exactly opposite, unless the personality is really really bad
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 02:59 PM
7

This is such a stupid question. Like, insultingly so. OP, do you really NOT realize why?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 06:12 PM
2

but I need to really get to know my partner first before I propose to her. At least 3 years and up being in a relationship with her and I will have an answer by then if she is the right person or not. well that sounds like a good answer, why not telling them that verbatim?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 04:55 PM
1

I mean, most of us want that, that's the biological 'mainstream', no?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 03:22 PM
1

but the guy would kill all attraction they had for him once he opened his mouth so basically, Cristiano Ronaldo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 03:16 PM
3

Especially when he's playing the tempter, against women who have significantly less experience with the game, just so he can judge. That is ... not a reasonable man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 03:09 PM
–

re inherently selfish. Especially when it comes to matters that dramatically alter their lives. Good luck convincing anyone to date to prevent some as vague as societal collapse. Can't argue with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:26 AM
–

What can Mr Average give them that they cannot give themselves. Well, how about LACK OF SOCIETAL COLLAPSE that will inevitably come if demography collapses to a degree where senior care, let alone healthcare will be completely impossible? Sort of return to Eskimo retirement plans? Cause you know, if one woman does that, no big deal. If ALL women do that ... what a beautiful prisoner's dilemma, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 07:47 PM
0

Horrible! People looking at other people to assess their attractiveness! Can men even stoop to a lower level? Even the height of WW2 didn't see such crimes! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 07:53 PM
1

Well, yes. There is a difference between marriage rate and singleness. While singledom is not captured on any reports, I believe it is much more important than marriage rate for these discussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 01:12 AM
3

Sure they do. The number of female breadwinners/sole earners has been increasing for years That doesn't mean they don't hate it. In the very study you linked, it clearly showed they had higher divorce rate than "standard" couples. "But the divorce rate of couples married in the '90s in which the wife is the breadwinner fell to 4% higher than those in which the husband is the breadwinner, the study showed."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:57 AM
3

46% is fucking mind-blowingly high number, what are you talking about? It may not be vast majority, but it's definitely a vast disaster
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:51 AM
3

People marry later in life nowadays, a very big part aren't married until after 30 And you, somehow, think they choose to do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 12:50 AM
2

It seems like very good system indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 11:21 AM
2

Strange to me but commendable. Much better then our system "if you fall down on your luck for a bit, you'll die alone in the streets"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 11:21 AM
5

Seems very communist-like. Asian culture? Seriously curious. Definitely not a thing in europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:22 PM
2

Cause it gives you the most important freedom - ability to not work, and yet not starve to death out in the street
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 04:57 PM
7

Normally in home with large extended families if someone decides they do not want children themselves they will help other family members buy homes etc What the hell? No. What kind of thinking is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 04:53 PM
1

i don’t have daddy issues lol. these idols tend to be the leaders of the group and i’m really attracted to that aspect you do have issues. I mean, just reading that sentence...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 05:39 PM
2

So for you it's normal to have sex with a person who is black out drunk See this is exactly you jumping to extreme examples to justify nonsense laws. I'm not talking about sober weirdo spiking drinks and chasing unconscious drunk women. I am talking about a couple being non-blackout drunk, but still considerably drunk having consensual sex that night. Because that, too, is now legally rape i.e. sex without informed consent which can be prosecuted as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 08:27 PM
3

Sex with a very drunk person was already rape before metoo (yes, it's rape to have sex with a very very drunk person who can barely walk, even if that person says "yes"). Your post is delusional. Let me illuminate by an example - if you REALLY believe what you wrote above, you must know that your dad raped your mom at least a few times, right? And very likely your mom did rape your dad at some point of their lives, too. And don't get me started on your grandparents. Are you coming from a family …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 06:00 PM
1

No, it has originated in holywood as backlash against rapy figureheads in the industry. It since devolved into targeting ALL men. It indeed led to extra laws and as I mentioned in my post, it completely missed the purpose - as predatory powerful men have way to protect themselves through wealth or abundance. Predatory non-powerful men have had effective laws against predation in place even before metoo. And non-predatory, non-powerful men (95%) are now facing some ridiculous legislature (informe…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 03:55 PM
-6

You're way off zeitgeist. EverVigilant1 is right - or rather, he is more right then you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 02:49 PM
1

I already suspect for a long time that whole #metoo thing was directed on high-status men of holywood, politics & corporate america (either rich, or powerful, or attractive, or all 3). Now of course research tells us dark triad is abundant with high-profile men, as it directly improves their ability to climb power hierarchy. This is a major problem - if laws that are hand-made against this type of men affect 95% of normal men negatively - and still don't do shit to improve behavior of these high…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 02:22 PM
–

more important than a pretty face -- a thick 'military' neck. What is up with this one? >>> that's because all things being equal, neck size is very good indicator of natural muscle mass
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 09:18 PM
1

Oh it was not to improve minority home ownership, believe you me. It was to boost wall street profits tru whatever shenanigans on subprimes and other financial derivates. Ownership for minorities was just a poster boy byproduct. Corporate financial idiocy+greed was the true cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:51 PM
1

"Problem is that theories about society wide trends are often BS." I tend to follow reputable news sources and peer-reviewed papers for reliable statistics. What you seem to describe are your "gut feelings" how things are and should be, which doesn't necessarily reflect reality. My reality is that 1. data show people are becoming single, lonely and unhappy in alarming rate 2. this personal unhappiness appears to leak into general politics - multiple european countries have now nazis in their gov…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 04:29 PM
1

Buddy, in here we're discussing society-wide trends, not 1 person experiences. If there's 30% uptick in singleness within barely a decade, that signifies something. Major trends need to be discussed. You know the saying - if you owe bank 10k and can't pay it, you got a problem. If you owe bank 10 million and can't pay it, it's the bank who got a problem? Collapse of dating market is similar - if couple men can't have sex, it's their problem. But once you got enough of them that it causes communi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 02:35 PM
1

Doesn't matter. They're still gone, off the dating market, creating surplus of supply. Remember last time, how home prices going down 25% nearly collapsed the economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:21 AM
9

And? Doesn't mean that average men aren't having casual sex. You literally have no idea how statistics work, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 12:18 AM
1

Oh yeah, ridiculously so. I am honestly surprised that young men are not radicalized more
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 03:25 PM
1

That is because in US, gangstas and weed dealers are higher status than you
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 12:32 AM
-1

if you know any Asian girls but they're very into status, much more than western women are Lol!! Now this quote shows you have no idea what you're talking about. NO ONE cares more about status than western women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 12:30 AM
1

an intelligent women will know he ain’t shit and even call him out on it ... so why he would ever go for an intelligent one? I mean, if purpose of a partnership is to feel good with someone, it completely beats the purpose
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 03:39 PM
1

Interesting. Some i kinda figured out too (such as love bombing, that stuff just works) others are new. Mindgames, for sure ...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 03:40 PM
1

Oh a misandrist with side hobby of trying to be a man police, that's new. Men are people - some are shitty, some are ok. Same goes for PUAs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 02:44 PM
1

learning about why women fall for narcissistic men and adopting those traits Do tell?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 12:16 AM
1

I call you misandrist too. Take a good hard look in the mirror
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 12:13 AM
1

It was blaming women "entering the workforce" for why wages are so bad now and no one can afford to be "traditional". That's false on many levels. By default, if the feminist push for equality causes women's wages to equal or surpass men's wages, makes it statistically hard for a woman to find a man that makes more than her i.e. can "provide", no? That's just logical. Also, I did mention in my original post that women's push for wage equality was definitely supported by entrepreneur class with u…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 08:38 PM
3

I do not pretend I have a solution. I suspect likely outcome is slow march towards swedish/japanese style epidemics of single homes and loneliness, until inevitable societal collapse creates some black swan event
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 08:22 PM
3

Women have always been in the labor market. You keep missing what I'm trying to say. Even in more remote past, women did not generally participate in LABOR (PAID) market. They did work, sure, but 1. not that frequently in salaried jobs 2. rarely outside home in a "full time" 40h weekly manner 3. did not participate in craftsmanships. Again, some did, but not in numbers that would impact economics of the era. Now the question is how long into past you want to go in these arguments. Pre-war? Pre-b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 08:12 PM
3

She approves of your comment and says she'll remember you kindly once her world domination plans finally come to fruition
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 07:11 PM
0

They have mostly worked at home i.e. not on labor market, but you're partially right, of course: tech/immigration/outsourcing were also major contributors. But the underlying result is the same - all of these caused men's wages to plummet (well plummet... but compared to previous generation their wages definitely got lower) and women that look for traditional setting/provider man have suddenly nearly no prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 07:08 PM
-1

I am able to give my card to my wife everytime she needs to pay anything she wants that is... not very traditional, my dude. Actually the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 05:29 PM
21

" not wanting to financially provide " Sister, that ship has sailed three decades ago when feminist power trippers (generously bankrolled by anti-labor capital) decided to dilute wage pool by flooding labor market without thinking about consequences. Expectations were to double family income, reality is that a family now NEEDS two incomes to maintain same living standards. So yeah. Very few men in middle class can now act in provider role. None in working class. Wage stagnation saw to that. Kiss…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 05:27 PM
2

that kind of non-answer to (narhwal's) political question is very triggering, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 08:51 PM
1

"I don't have a general view on a specific group of refugees based solely on their origin" "I don't". Yeah, sure. You swedish are truly the worst. 20 years of throwing political temper tantrums to the rest of the Europe about not following your misguided ways, and then suddenly doing 180 and voting nazi party into your government without getting an ounce of bad press.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 08:42 PM
1

I don’t believe a man’s value comes from his net-worth so it’s a moot point if you ask me. But it doesn't matter if you don't believe it, if majority of society believes in it. Remember men are trying to improve their chances in general, i.e. aiming for what is perceived as high value in majority. Again I'm not saying anything bad about volunteering, I'm just explaining why there's such a gap even though it would be a great ground for lonely men to meet women - about that I have no doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 10:40 AM
1

I meant that fighting in wars pre-WW1 was usually highly lucrative - of course only if you survived - so men tend to use up the hierarchy ladder after a winning war. The dead men of course did not profit, but then again, they were dead so hardly could express any regrets.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 12:27 PM
1

Sure, all you wrote makes sense morally. But I meant this in specific economic/sociological sense: IF society perceives man's value as his net worth (and it does), THEN statistically speaking, men will minimize their low paid effort i.e. volunteering and maximize their high earning efforts, ie work. That just can't work any other way, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 12:22 PM
2

Yes, something strange happened in holywood after 2000, and since 2010ish it exploded. Each man archetype is either dumb, pitiable, evil or cruel, and every woman is just morally superior at all times. Makes for very bland and predictable storytelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 11:29 PM
1

This is the best summary of the issue I've seen so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 03:53 PM
5

when almost all organizations I’ve ever volunteered for need more hands on deck Answer to this is easy. Nearly all volunteering is unpaid. Nearly all signs men get from society is that he should maximize his earnings Consequently, volunteering is detrimental to man's own mating prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 03:22 PM
1

The number of involuntarily celibate men has stayed consistent throughout all of human history. Well at least we had decency to let them die in the wars back then, so either they made it big or at least didn't suffer too long ...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 03:19 PM
2

Well written opinion. And sad truth is, also accurate - there are not many options to achieve any improvement for men in the future. One path is that current discontent will erode societal stability and cause war, either civil or actual (see: france, russia). Another would be indeed wide-range apprenticeship but with that we're getting dangerously close to abandoning mass production and moving on to economics of roman decline / latifundii serfdom.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 02:12 PM
–

Idk what texts you read, he said either change or let’s part ways As opposed to... what? "Either change, or I will do nothing and suffer in silence to please you"? Like it or not, but declaring clearly to your partner that you will break with someone over this or that redline is a respectful and healthy communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 12:28 AM
2

I don't care about his mama drama. Or truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:51 PM
3

ve any kind of authority is because the wife trusts him enough to take the lead and if she even wants him to have authority - its a two way street, if you want to have authority over the household and the only way you can do it is by limiting her power, you’re flat out just controlling. Meh. You know what they say, nature abhors vacuum. And women are very, very natural. OP is right and lack of power in relationship is not working well for those women who are not naturally dominant (and there's l…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 07:09 PM
9

but for a lot of men being in a bad relationship (and getting some sex) is preferable to being single No. As a man... yeah, just no. You must have had some very good "bad relationship" to say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 04:26 PM
2

My shitty nation doesn't deserve anything from me. That should be said first and foremost. I'm not american ofc, but this generally applies to any nation... unless you had quite a lucky life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 08:35 PM
–

genuinely libertarian men what does a " genuinely libertarian men" entail?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 06:21 PM
3

Is it that they think they can only ask out a large woman because she’s desperate for a date? That got to be killer on the self esteem for the guy doing the asking too. Yes and yes, generally speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 09:02 PM
–

and I firmly believe her money is her money and my money is our money You, sir, have issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 11:41 PM
2

Bravo! This actually sounds scarily probable state of things
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 05:54 PM
18

OP is delusional. First, most of what she wrote is factually incorrect. Second, ideal body preference varies greatly between men and women - while men overwhelmingly prefer slim body type (cause it's typically feature of youth), women prefer "tall + broad chest & shoulders" bodytype and generally disregard some bodyfat (not excessive ofc) as long as those main features are there. I mean, number of research papers done about this alone can fill a library.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 12:29 PM
2

I am talking about age 25-35 in my area. Glad to see some circles somewhere have healthy dynamics going, but again, not my personal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:57 PM
1

Are you suggesting that this is the bottom 70%? It fits perfectly, doesn't it? But nah, there's certainly overlap but surely not like this. I'm just saying from my personal experience that women with options seem to enjoy looking for options infinitely, despite claiming 'they'd like to commit'. And that this change happened lately, def not common in last generation or earlier. And to be honest this can't be new to you. I mean, half the posts on this sub are debating exactly this
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:59 PM
1

If we are talking about the top 10% of women Not even that picky, let alone 0.0x%. I'm talking about top 30%-ish which is a reasonable cutoff in my opinion, because that's around where personality starts carrying more weight than looks, at least for purpose of long term relationship personal beauty preferences start to get too varied as well at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:16 PM
0

The mating market cannot grow imbalanced. Women are still looking for long term relationships with men. Well, are they looking for long term relationships? Or are they really ... you know, looking for looking for long term relationships? Because honestly that seems to be the part they enjoy the most, at least the attractive ones with nearly unlimited options. I feel like choice paralysis is a thing there
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 01:03 AM
0

So if I understand this particular threat correctly, we have 1. literally a top 1/30 man and 2. a "very-high-match-rate" 9/10 woman ... spending their time spamming Reddit instead of devoting their time to a happy, meaningful relationship such high attractiveness surely commands. This sub is hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 12:58 AM
2

rather than using it to benefit society as a whole it’s gonna be wasted if you buy a car and park it in your yard to use it as extra storage closet, does it "waste" other cars for rest of the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 01:36 PM
1

all it does is steal from public repos see? it's already mimicking average human programmer to perfection.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 01:44 AM
4

or C, AI tech with good feedback on your physical readings/blood pressure/facial expression recognition that will perpetually hit that perfect spot between "pleasant" and "not boring" Come on. This is tech we're talking about, sky's the limit. Recognizing mental patterns of a barely evolved ape shouldn't be a major hurdle.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/23 01:40 AM
3

" seems like a lot of guys here don’t really approach women and then they complain about how bad dating is" I'm also in habit of not spending my weekly wages on a casino roulette each payday, because I can calculate risk-reward ratio. In another words - just the common knowledge about current status of dating market based on their personal/friend circle is enough to deter a lot of men, and that's understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:31 AM
1

safe enough to put off settling down until they find someone they click with I guess I'm not talking about merely waiting and putting it off? I'm talking about never settling down, an epidemic of single-person homes Sweden style what worries me
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/23 01:32 AM
1

I think men really need to consider what is it that would tempt a woman to give up safety, comfort, and luxury Interesting. If this is really default woman's psyche, it would mean that the survival of human race did rely solely on need for safety/resources until now. And, to continue that train of thought, it will mean that humanity will die off shortly, now that economic and safety independence has been achieved (in most of the world, anyway). Or evolution will jumpstart-create a different kind…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/23 12:44 AM
2

"Women are generally more likely to be “won over”. >>> This is very likely true, but contemporary culture is hammering into men that this is considered sexual harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/23 12:30 AM
1

Well, I mean... if future of our species depends of clowning and degradation, we're better off going extinct, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/23 08:08 PM
1

Ha! Did you try to talk with chatgpt recently? Even in this basic form, it's already surprisingly passable chat partner. Slap next version of it on a decent high end sexdoll and you'll be surprised how quickly can people anthropomorphize piece of rubber.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 10:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter