| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thoughts on impov classes? | colourofawesome | /r/seduction | 29/09/11 01:41 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Would you date a woman knowing that they're waiting until marriage to have sex?I have no shame in saying that sex is important to me, especially in a long term relationship. It's a part of who I am, so it's something I want to be able to share with someone I plan on spending the rest of my life with. | /r/seduction | 31/12/11 09:20 AM |
| 3 | Slut Walk participant pissed that newspaper had the audacity to run her photoAnd I think that's because there's no intellectual challengers to their position that they have to work on arguing against. When you can win any argument by dropping "Mysoginist," "objectifying," or "anti-woman," you tend to get a little lazy with your philosophy. When you have those magic bullets why bother using anything else? | /r/MensRights | 28/10/11 03:05 PM |
| 6 | Slut Walk participant pissed that newspaper had the audacity to run her photoHaha that's some meta-hypocrisy there. I just want to say to her "do you realize you're making absolutely no sense right now?" | /r/MensRights | 28/10/11 03:01 PM |
| 8 | Feminists pissed about the recent testicular cancer PSA.Really. You reinforce a stereotype, not shock at a woman having a scrotum. You express shock at a woman having a scrotum because seriously, what are the fucking odds? I mean I know there's women with scrotums out there, but it's not exactly something you see enough for it not to be at least kinda surprising. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 06:51 PM |
| 3 | NY cops tell women not to wear skimpy outfits while rapist who loves skimpy outfits is loose, feminists freak out!“He pointed at my outfit and said, ‘Don’t you think your shorts are a little short?‘” To be fair, if a cop stopped me and said something like this I'd be pissed too. They should be a bit more sensitive when talking to people about it rather than taking an accusatory tone. That being said, if the police had said nothing about the sexual assaults, hadn't told anyone that there was a profiled target, then people would be equally pissed because they were withholding information. They were doing to r… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/11 07:07 PM |
| 3 | Gawker mocks r/MensRightsStandard feminist tactic. Insult the sexuality of the man who you don't like. Those cunts just beg for a black eye. If this is how you express yourself on an issue that conerns you greatly, you are going to get nothing but attacks on your person. For one thing it doesn't sound like it concerns you, it sounds like you're a troll. It doesn't matter if you are or not, that's how it comes across and that is how people will treat you. Plus you're justifying punching a woman in the face by saying she … | /r/MensRights | 28/09/11 03:31 AM |
| 6 | Gawker mocks r/MensRightsPretty much goes back to my original point that if you're so sensitive about your sex life that you'll punch anyone who challenges it, it really doesn't help your case. In fact it just seems like you really do have something to be sensitive about. I'm not saying you shouldn't care about your sex life, I mean I care about my sex life, but you just can't give that much of a shit what others say otherwise you're letting everyone know exactly how to push your buttons. You said up there that it's sta… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/11 02:11 AM |
| 6 | Gawker mocks r/MensRightsIf you didn't care what I thought then why punch me in the face? | /r/MensRights | 28/09/11 01:52 AM |
| 11 | Gawker mocks r/MensRightsIf someone punched me in the face the first thing I'd think is "wow, this guy must have a good sex life." | /r/MensRights | 27/09/11 11:52 PM |
| 4 | 6 of 10 women will experience sexual/physical violence in their lifetimes globally. Ofcourse they use "economic abuse" as a criteria...wtf? Are women that weak? Shouldn't they earn themselves, for themselves?I'm very glad this is the top comment right now. Articles like this are always a little sticky because of their breadth. It's simply not possible to sum up several different kinds of violence against half the world's population spanning thousands of cultures with different customs and definitions of abuse without muddying the waters. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/11 04:37 AM |
| 16 | In case you needed further evidence that the mods in /r/againstmensrights aren't egalitarian.You're absolutely right, yet we obsess over them, giving them more power and letting them think we give a shit. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/11 10:32 PM |
| 37 | In case you needed further evidence that the mods in /r/againstmensrights aren't egalitarian.Don't they want us to post stuff like this complaining about them? They're basically a troll subreddit, why give them attention? It's not like we can change any minds over there. Can't we just pretend they don't exist and stop posting links to shit they've said? | /r/MensRights | 21/09/11 10:00 PM |
| 7 | "10 reasons feminism is good for men" -> Or, How to use incorrect data and stereotypes to try to convince people of a reality not supported by data/experienceI especially like how it assumes, 3 times, that the woman in your life isn't getting paid enough because she's a woman. Granted it's meant to be humourous, so I trake to take stuff like this with a grain of salt. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/11 06:40 PM |
| 3 | The fact that people like this exist scares me. [Facebook]Ah, I wasn't on board until she started using all caps and multiple punctuations, now I really see her point. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 04:55 AM |
| 19 | Harriet Harman and her coterie of sexist feminists must be stoppedImagine the men held a "what men want" meeting at the same time as this. How would that be viewed? | /r/MensRights | 11/09/11 05:14 PM |
| 2 | Colleges expand definitions of sexual misconduct to punish consensual sexYes you are absolutely right. I was referring to physically restraining somebody, which is easier for men to do, although like you say, is certainly done by women too. I should have clarified or rephrased. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/11 04:41 AM |
| 23 | Colleges expand definitions of sexual misconduct to punish consensual sexOne of the many problems with this is that nobody seems to be considering is that women are just as capable of abusing power as men are. If women are capable of ruining someone's life at the mention of "coercion," then some will do this when it is totally unjustified, whether for control, blackmail, or whatever else. Yes the number of women who would do this is very small, but so is the number of men who would actually commit rape. Both involve using a power the other doesn't have to control, ma… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 05:59 PM |
| 4 | Colleges expand definitions of sexual misconduct to punish consensual sexThis is what I don't understand. As a guy, I find all these laws meant to dictate acceptable sexual behaviour are incredible insulting to women. They make it out to be like women have no control over anything, and are to weak to turn down any advance. It's to the point, culturally, where approaching a woman you find attractive is a sexist act. If these laws are to be believed, men are nothing but sex hungry beasts whose behaviour needs to be checked at all times, and women are poor little depend… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 05:46 PM |
| 17 | Living with two menHonestly, the idea of men having issues with inequality took me a while to understand too, and I'm a guy. It wasn't until a few years into college that it clicked that what I felt in certain situations was inequality, not personal shortcomings. women and men are indeed different, but not in the ways that society makes us believe. I couldn't agree more, wouldn't it be nice if these differences were something we could all just be okay with, even celebrate? Different but equal. Like you said, in th… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/11 08:15 AM |
| 42 | Living with two menI feel these things are way more dependent on the individual than the sex of the room mate. You pretty much hit the nail on the head right there. I've had a couple female roommates and never had any real problems, at least none that would have been any different if they were male. Just out of curiosity, what do you mean that r/mensrights was difficult for you to fully grasp? Do you feel like living with guys has changed that at all? | /r/MensRights | 07/09/11 07:28 AM |
| 1 | A Comment from TwoXChromosomes: "The wage gap is a myth....We don't need feminism anymore."Awesome, thanks. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 09:01 PM |
| 1 | A Comment from TwoXChromosomes: "The wage gap is a myth....We don't need feminism anymore."Does anyone have any sources for what she's talking about? I like to be able to quote a source when debating this with people. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 07:14 PM |
| 3 | What I mean when I talk about "crazy feminists" (from now on I'm going to refer to it as crazy lines of thinking)Define consent. Also, respond to my other post, with the scenario where I give consent, buth change my mind later. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 05:38 AM |
| 4 | What I mean when I talk about "crazy feminists" (from now on I'm going to refer to it as crazy lines of thinking)Okay, that I understand, but what constitutes "meaningful uncoerced sex" isn't always clear. I fully agree that everyone should take every precaution. We should all use protection and we should make sure the other person is willing to have sex. If somebody, at any point, says that they want to stop, of course things should stop. But if nobody ever says stop, or makes any attempt, vocally or otherwise, to stop things, how can they accuse the other person of coercing them later? It's about choices… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 05:19 AM |
| 3 | What I mean when I talk about "crazy feminists" (from now on I'm going to refer to it as crazy lines of thinking)can you rephrase that Sure, what I meant is that it sounds like when you said this: This person should not have sex with drunk people. ...you were saying that there is something unique about this person in my story that made it feel like rape. Like if it was somebody else it wouldn't have felt like rape. If you are able to meaningfully choose to have sex, sure. The problem here is that you can't define "meaningful" in a concrete way. Sex isn't always meaningful and it shouldn't have to be, somet… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 05:07 AM |
| 10 | What I mean when I talk about "crazy feminists" (from now on I'm going to refer to it as crazy lines of thinking)Which person? Me or the other one? We were both drunk remember. Are you implying that there is something inherent in cetain people that will make others feel as though they had been raped if they have sex with them while drunk? | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 04:24 AM |
| 4 | What I mean when I talk about "crazy feminists" (from now on I'm going to refer to it as crazy lines of thinking)Well said, although you might want to clarify, that laws shouldn't be used against people that are based on feelings that are stated after the fact. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 04:17 AM |
| 3 | What I mean when I talk about "crazy feminists" (from now on I'm going to refer to it as crazy lines of thinking)I get what you're saying, but take this scenario: I'm at a party, drunk. I meet another person, also drunk. We talk, dance, go to an empty room, start making out, and have sex. Neither of us at any point protested or voiced any feelings of having reservations over the sex. We were both pretty drunk so we didn't really vocalize too much, and I was certainly too drunk to think too much about the potential consequences. The next day the other person gets a visit from the police because I feel like … | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 04:13 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter