TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

colttaine Archive

View 2 posts and 261 comments by colttaine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
81

colttaine/r/MGTOW01/11/20 12:33 PM
62

colttaine/r/MGTOW01/01/20 02:06 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

There is no end goal. Never attribute to malice/conspiracy what can be explained by incomplete/stupidity.
/r/MGTOW12/12/20 01:03 AM
8

Got a link to the original article?
/r/MGTOW30/11/20 10:01 PM
1

Link to original?
/r/MGTOW29/11/20 10:01 PM
37

I guess it depends on the definition. Is RedPill just being aware of the situation? Or acting upon that knowledge. I think a great many men are at least purple pilled. They know about the divorce rate, and suicide rate etc. But they foolishly think they're the exception to the rule.
/r/MGTOW28/11/20 04:55 AM
2

Sure. That's how tax works. And I get that taxes are necessary for a society to function. The question is what that tax money should be spent on and why. I don't think the government should be subsidising women. As long as the government is (at the behest of women) then women basically religating themselves to dependent children to the state. "To be fair" women aren't earning as much as men because they work fewer hours in easier jobs. Theyre lazy. And then they demand free shit from the governm…
/r/MGTOW27/11/20 11:23 PM
1

Yes they earn higher wages... Because they work longer hours, in more difficult/dangerous jobs. What a revolution... As I said, this is really just more proof that women aren't adult enough to get off their arses and provide for themselves the way men do. Instead it's "daddy government, give me free stuff because I have a vagina" And that free stuff is ultimately paid for by men's additional hours of hard work in dangerous jobs.
/r/MGTOW27/11/20 10:31 PM
2

Actually I think you'll find that Scotland did what you're talking about back in 2018. Their current goal is "universal free access" because it's apparently a "basic right". In any case I find their justification questionable from a male perspective. All this talk about "period poverty" when 85% of rough sleepers in the UK are men. And the fact that women are hard done by because they spend $3000 on sanitary products over their lifetimes when men pay many times more than that each year in tax co…
/r/MGTOW27/11/20 09:49 PM
2

I think you answered your own question. There are plenty of things that are "necessities". Not just food, but other sanitary products as well like toilet paper. The only items being made free is stuff for women...
/r/MGTOW26/11/20 11:34 PM
13

What is it with American girls and those disgusting fake witch nails?
/r/MGTOW25/11/20 11:20 PM
9

Women are rapidly convincing me that TFM was right all along...
/r/MGTOW25/11/20 09:37 AM
4

This was covered pretty well in the 2008 documentary Hjernevask https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E577jhf25t4
/r/MGTOW25/11/20 07:51 AM
3

The TL;DR is in the title of the article itself. "Men are garbage" interspersed with "Women are victims"
/r/MGTOW22/11/20 01:21 AM
2

"Personally, I think it would be super swell if my biggest problem as a woman was not getting a fucking Google Doodle on International Women's Day, instead of having to worry that the Supreme Court will take away my reproductive rights. But, hey! That's me! I'm weird like that." You mean those reproductive rights that men in 2020 are still lacking? Ok then...
/r/MGTOW22/11/20 01:20 AM
147

"There are several flaws to this logic." It's not logic though. It's instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 11:59 AM
37

"Help them get back to work" Right... We all know what this is. It's a fucking bribe. Women are lazy, and they have to be bribed to work. Big-Tech have known this for years. 50% of "women in tech" who take maternity leave never return to the workforce. That's why companies like Google have to keep offering them more and more free shit, to "entice" them to come back..
/r/MGTOW18/11/20 05:27 AM
0

Women are just candy. That's basically it.... Not healthy, but it tastes good i guess....
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 02:49 PM
7

Muh bro Barbarossa. CS Mgtow. ManWomanMyth. PaulProteus. Thugtician
/r/MGTOW217/11/20 02:23 PM
5

The majority of married people I know who work together, met in the workplace.
/r/MGTOW17/11/20 05:54 AM
22

LOL, feminism now advocating for the Mike Pence rule...
/r/MGTOW17/11/20 05:31 AM
2

Who the fuck says "pacific" instead of "specific"? That seems like a weirdly pacific thing to put on your dating profile...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/20 02:36 AM
3

No. How did that movie end? Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:34 PM
3

I think this is because men understand that if they're not diplomatic there could be recourse. I don't think women have the same worry, and to the extent that they do, some man will swoop in to protect/defend her.
/r/MGTOW13/11/20 10:11 PM
3

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
/r/MGTOW02/11/20 11:50 AM
2

I watch a lot of Netflix. Strictly for the Hallmark content...
/r/MGTOW02/11/20 11:48 AM
8

I haven't watched the series, but this really happened, in real life, back in 1956 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_of_the_Century_%28chess%29 Fuck Bobby Fischer though, because he's the wrong gender...
/r/MGTOW02/11/20 11:45 AM
2

What are your interests? I would start there.
/r/MGTOW202/11/20 11:38 AM
20

My family was middle income, and growing up I never got anything even approaching $800 for Christmas. I'd hazard a guess, that the horrible spending habit (or rather the entitled mentality behind it) is the very reason she's a single mother in the first place.
/r/MGTOW30/10/20 03:19 PM
35

The thing I find funny, is that she wants to "Stop rewarding men with sex for basic human decency", but then while she's stringing this "basically decent" guy along she is "fucking some hot but unsuitable for a relationship guy on the side to bide her time"... Um ok...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 02:17 PM
5

That's not what I got from your comment at all. That wasn't what "we'all" were talking about. And I don't see how being a 6'1 Asian doc is relevant.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 01:07 PM
7

I got that. I don't see how anything you said was relevant to my videos or my comment. Not very smart I see.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 11:50 AM
3

Can a cohabitating partner do this? In Australia? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 11:23 AM
4

Whu?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 07:17 AM
5

I mostly use Google-Sheets simply for the "access anywhere" convenience. However if you don't like/trust Google (which is entirely understandable) you should look at LibreOffice Calc which has all of the functionally of Excel that basic users require. https://www.libreoffice.org/ I also saw a recent video by ChrisTitusTech where he recommended OnlyOffice which appears to be aimed at emulating the exact look/layout/ui of Excel, so users could make a straight transition. https://www.onlyoffice.com…
/r/MGTOW230/10/20 01:20 AM
8

At the very least 40 year old landwales wouldn't be able to act so entitled when any man could go down to the local brothel and get his pole waxed by a 19 year old. And yet in countries like Australia and Germany where prostitution is legal, this is still how 40 year old landwales act...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/20 10:28 PM
9

especially Japanese women: they're not fat, covered in tattoos, espouse traditional gender roles, and not religiously involved in hookup culture as in the west LOL, as long as you don't mind being worked into an early grave to uphold that "traditional gender role"... Not sure about the hookup culture either. I've had friends who've lived in Japan, that tell me that the Japanese are very cold and calculating when it comes to sex. Its not as overtly in-your-face as it is in the western mainstream …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/20 12:28 PM
4

Sure, in towns like Kalgoorlie. Perhaps even in some cities like Perth. In other major cities like Sydney and Melbourne I'm not so sure that applies... In any case, what you're advocating for is probably closer to how things operate in Germany: http://business.time.com/2013/06/18/germany-has-become-the-cut-rate-prostitution-capital-of-the-world/ However Germany is still an extremely feminist country. Don't get me wrong. I'm fully pro-prostitution. But I'm also a pragmatist. I don't see (based on…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/20 09:05 AM
7

I wouldn't go counting my chicken's before they hatch. Prostitution is legal here in Australia (as well as other western countries like Germany) and it really hasn't done much to change the status quo. As I said in the video, most men looking for real long-term relationships, aren't looking to start one with a sex worker, so day-to-day they are still prone to simping hard. Furthermore, when women (read: Feminist lobby groups) "push for the legalization of prostitution" they tend to push for the …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/20 07:38 AM
15

"Gold Rush" is a good way to put it. I suspect very few women will actually make a living (or even worthwhile supplemental income) from OnlyFans. However that is (in my opinion) a secondary issue to the fact that so many women legitimately see it as a viable option in the first place. Consider that mainstream feminist outlets like BuzzFeed are publishing articles like this one https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/otilliasteadman/pandemic-nurses-onlyfans-sex-work We're in the middle of a world wi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/20 07:29 AM
19

I focus on western/anglo countries because: a) That is the culture I and most people I know (including my audience) live in. b) It is the culture that most other non-western countries are trying to emulate/moving towards. This idea that you can just go to Asia and find a "good-woman" is incredibly flawed. These countries are becoming more and more like the west every day. - We all know about Japan and the herbivore men. - The crude divroce rate of South Korea is 4.4 - Over 70% of divorces in Chi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/20 07:12 AM
8

Suffice to say I'm closer to 40 than I am to 30.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/20 06:38 AM
2

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9775689/ There was an over-all gender effect, with wives significantly (p< ,002) less satisfied than their husbands with their marriage; Furthermore, the ratio of satisfied wives to dissatisfied husbands (among couples with substantial differences in marital satisfaction) neared or reached 2:1, as expected from previous research.
/r/MGTOW229/10/20 04:04 AM
6

My general stance is "What do I view these people as first and foremost". My mother isn't a "woman", she's a genetic relative. The females at work aren't "women", they're colleagues. I don't believe this applies to most domains of freely associated social groups. Women literally prance around calling themselves "Girl Gamers", and "Skepchicks", and "Women in Tech". HOG international have an entire sub branch called "Ladies Of Harley" and most of them don't even own their own motorcycle. They're j…
/r/MGTOW224/10/20 03:32 AM
4

Friendship? Hobbies and social groups? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyvEybH77zI As far as I can tell, men and women share very few common interests. There doesn't seem to be a good basis for platonic friendship between the genders. Most platonic friendships I've observed between men and women appears to mostly be chameleon shit (feigning interest in something) in the vein hopes that something sexual will eventuate from it. Advice from those with experience, like doctors? As I clearly said in …
/r/MGTOW224/10/20 02:50 AM
7

Man I'm getting sick of hearing you guys bash on the MGTOW1 subreddit. The things you're claiming that are rampant there really aren't... In any case, I think "enough women have cooties" that on a risk assessment basis, it just makes sense not to get involved with them. If you don't share any common interests, and if you're not looking for a relationship, then there's really no benefit. The article by the radical feminist is a reflection of what I see more and more in MGTOW forums. Really? I mea…
/r/MGTOW224/10/20 01:45 AM
5

Here's a question to differentiate MGTOW from this brand of feminism. In her bid to "eradicate" men from her life, does that include eradicating (or at the very least forgoing) tax money that is overwhelmingly paid by men? Honestly, if she wants to live a life free of men, I have no problem with that. I don't care if she wants a girls club, and I'm more than happy for MGTOW is a boys club. It is literally "Men Going Their Own Way" so I don't know why anyone would try to spin it as a boys club th…
/r/MGTOW224/10/20 12:01 AM
1

I would say specifically that men care more about fertility, and looks are a proxy indicator for that. Likewise, women care more about protection/provision. Money serves as a proxy indicator for resources and social standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 05:13 AM
1

Yes... marrying up within the socio-economic hierarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 02:10 AM
3

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322128430_Different_impacts_of_resources_on_opposite_sex_ratings_of_physical_attractiveness_by_males_and_females According to this study: We found that ratings of attractiveness were around 1000 times more sensitive to salary for females rating males, compared to males rating females. These results indicate that higher economic status can offset lower physical attractiveness in men much more easily than in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 11:55 PM
14

Yeah, except this article is over a year old... Since then: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2020/08/13/federal-appeals-court-male-only-draft-is-constitutional/
/r/PussyPass19/10/20 02:36 AM
8

Lol NSW had 11 cases in a force of 17,111.... That's less than a tenth of a percent... 11 / 17111 = 0.00064
/r/MGTOW19/10/20 02:22 AM
3

I think its more that the vast majority of men don't want a long term relationship with a prostitute. Ie, it's not just about sex, its about female validation as well. You can legalise prostitution, but most normie guys want to fall in love and start a family etc. They don't want to do that with a hooker.
/r/MGTOW17/10/20 11:47 PM
3

If you don't care, then what's the point of legalising brothels? How will that help hold them accountable, responsible and stop subsidising them? The problem in this case, isn't even the way women act. The problem is the way men act. You can legalise brothels all you want, but the majority of men are still going to simp for women, because the majority of men aren't looking to fall in love and start a long term relationship with a hooker.
/r/MGTOW17/10/20 11:45 PM
14

Prostitution is legal in my country, as well as several European countries like Germany. I can tell you first hand, that it makes fuck all difference to how the average Australian man acts around the average Australian woman.
/r/MGTOW17/10/20 01:09 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MGTOW217/10/20 03:23 AM
2

I can't speak to Murder2 or Murder3. In Australia death caused by negligence would would be classified as "manslaughter" rather than murder. Regardless, we're not talking about a situation where you randomly come to my house and assault me for no reason. This guy was under arrest. He was screaming that he couldn't breath even when the cops didn't have hands on him, which brings into question how seriously they take the claim for the following 10 minutes. And he started self harming in their lega…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 03:39 PM
3

I just found a clip of it. Seems to show Shaver reach behind his back just before the shots were fired. Personally I think there are far better options the cops could have taken, like keep him lying down arms/legs crossed and move in to cuff him without the need for him to crawl forward at all (although I don't know what their specific training says about this in their jurisdiction) Given the way the situation unfolded, it looked to me like he moved his arm back, and in a split second the cop ha…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 05:30 AM
1

The guy died from Positional Asphyxia combined with the high levels of Methamphetamine and Fentanyl that was in his system. He was apparently screaming that he couldn't breath when was sitting in the back of the squad car unrestrained, so what were the cops supposed to think? He then started self harming in the back of the squad car (smashing his head against the glass window) which is why they had to take him out and ground stabilise him. I think the cops miscalculated the situation (which can …
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 05:01 AM
1

Video is blocked in my country.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 05:01 AM
0

I've not seen any video footage like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 02:49 AM
34

I know a lot of cops. Not a single one of them is bad. Like, obviously there are some bad cops out there somewhere (bad people exists, and some are bound to be cops), but the majority are good people, who want to make the communities they live in a better place. I think this mentality that "all cops are bad and we need to defund the police", ultimately comes from the same place as claims that "all men are bad and we need to smash the patriarchy" It comes from a certain subset of people who have …
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 01:32 AM
98

Props to the cop for keeping such a cool head.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 01:00 AM
3

Lol. I've mostly been called autistic by other men for questioning their "happy ever after" fantasy.
/r/MGTOW14/10/20 09:40 AM
6

https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/family-violence-a-national-legal-response-alrc-report-114/25-sexual-offences-3/rape-the-penetrative-sexual-offence/ Actually, that definition is out of date. All Australian jurisdictions now include some requirement of "consent" as part of their legal definition. However they also require the act to be penetrative, so it's still basically a gendered definition whereby women legally can't rape men.
/r/MGTOW212/10/20 09:59 AM
179

To their credit, at least it's a more economically viable degree than Gender-Studies...
/r/MGTOW12/10/20 09:30 AM
12

why they have decided to make it a media piece? Dude, it's ABC. That's all the explanation you need... The BBC is more woke than anything in America, and the ABC is arguably more woke than the BBC, so they could in fact be the worst media organisation in the western world today. The only outlet I've seen that comes close is Deutche Welle.
/r/MGTOW212/10/20 07:26 AM
4

I'm in a very similar situation. I work 12 x 12 hour shifts a month. The pay where I am is fairly reasonable though. I just finished a string of nightshifts so now I have 10 days off.
/r/MGTOW212/10/20 07:04 AM
3

This in my opinion is the primary difference between MGTOW and TRP/PUA. Both communities fundamentally agree on most aspects of human nature (especially male/female relations). But their goals; how they choose to apply that knowledge is different. TRP/PUA still ultimately seek validation from women. They're just a bit more savvy and knowledgeable about how to do it, than the average desperate blue pill simp. But like this guy demonstrates, knowing the hidden truth that she want's alpha-chad, doe…
/r/MGTOW12/10/20 06:53 AM
1

I don't understand why they think I'd be good for an affair [...] I doubt this is very common behaviour, so if this has happened "about 8 or 9 times" then I think she has her answer. Just imagine what her total body-count must be... Lets say that hypothetically 1 in 5 guys do this (which would be a ridiculous overestimation). If it's happened to her "about 8 or 9 times", that would mean that she's fucked at least 40-45 different guys.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/20 05:30 AM
1

You must want a traditional feminine stay home wife, and kids She doesn't say so in the bio, but does she already have kids? Because at 37 I don't like her chances of making any more...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/20 05:21 AM
63

At least this time no dogs got thrown at the camera...
/r/PussyPass12/10/20 04:09 AM
4

Acceptance, of your ad hominem attacks great. You just admitted that you are totally incapable of arguing. Lol, what planet are you living on? Pointing out that you're a giant hypocritical liar who literally started this entire thread as a petty ad hominem attack against me because you got schooled about statistics in another reddit thread, is not an admission that I'm incapable of arguing.,, But how interesting... so your basic-bitch tactic is to just categorically deny everything (despite mult…
/r/MGTOW10/10/20 06:04 AM
3

You have been spamming with ad hominem attacks Aww... poor little victim :'( But its kinda funny, that ad hominem attacks weren't an issue, when you decided to make this thread publicly bashing me, with a title calling me a "white knight", a "cuck" and falsely accusing me of defrauding the MGTOW community The only reason you called my comment "spamming" [blah blah blah] The only reason I called your comment "spamming" is because you posted the same comment multiple times in different places, eve…
/r/MGTOW09/10/20 11:34 PM
3

"You're the one spamming" Lol, so your argument is basically ignore my detailed response to that comment and childishly say "no you"... 👍classy...
/r/MGTOW09/10/20 09:52 AM
3

Lol, Great comeback.... 👍 No really, you've totally vindicated yourself there by re-spamming the very same comment that I just responded to... Good work 👏👏👏 Lol, "dishonest" indeed...
/r/MGTOW09/10/20 07:50 AM
4

I've already wasted too much time arguing with this vindictive dishonest clown. This will be my final word on the matter
/r/MGTOW09/10/20 12:14 AM
1

Lol, bitch are you for real? That's actually hilarious... You lost the right to say that when you have misrepresented me the entire time. Want quote? The very post (the screenshot) says that. but i guess you won't acknowledge that. You mean the out of context screenshot, that you intentionally and misleadingly excised of all context, because otherwise people would have seen that the exchange shown in the screenshot was actually me having to correct you and tell you it was 19%, because you'd fail…
/r/MGTOW09/10/20 12:08 AM
1

Lol you're too scared to accurately quote me and argue against the actual point I made. You're too scared to address and substantiate your own position that this entire conversation is a result of. Grow a spine and stop being dishonest. Address the points.
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 10:11 AM
1

What's petty? You went and spammed the same comment in multiple places. Seems more pragmatic than petty.
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 10:08 AM
2

Its a link to your other post, where i actually responded you retard. My "argument" is there...
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 09:46 AM
1

Dude. Stop being a bitch. Address the issue that was actually made. You claimed 70-90%. Now show your supporting evidence like you have demanded from me. Show us all that you aren't a giant hypocritical liar.
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 09:44 AM
2

*Sigh* https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/j5vfqf/exposing_this_fraud_mgtow_youtuber_who_is_most/g83d5eh?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 09:42 AM
1

Lol, retard spaming his own thread with multiple copy/pasta of the same comment. https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/j5vfqf/exposing_this_fraud_mgtow_youtuber_who_is_most/g83e49k?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Yeah, you're a real intellectual heavy weight guy :)
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 09:42 AM
1

Yes. It is your own standard of evidence. You made a claim of 70-90%. You're demanding a study from me that shows 20-30% (which i believe I have adequately shown). Yet you fail to deliver your own study showing 70-90%. Going by what you've called men, then by your own criteria, you are a lying narcissist too. Stop strawmanning. Stop lying. And present your evidence to support your assertion, as you have demanded from me. What? You're incapable of doing that, because you're full of shit. Lol... y…
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 09:37 AM
6

Ditto. Show me that you can actually meet the same standard of evidence that you're demanding from me. Show me that you aren't the same narcissistic liar that you claim I am... What's that? You can't?
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 09:35 AM
2

What do you mean "exposed again"? I've actually provided studies. You've provided nothing. What am i exposed of, when you can't even provide studies yourself?
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 09:34 AM
1

Ditto. Show me that you can actually meet the same standard of evidence that you're demanding from me. Show me that you aren't the same narcissistic liar that you claim I am... What's that? You can't?
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 09:33 AM
2

*Gently whispers in ear* Context faggot.... stop strawmaning me and use the full quote.... But that based on the evidences we have the range is far more likely to lie between 20-30% than 70-90%. ​ Like i said, based on all the evidence I've seen, the numbers for infidelity would probably lie somewhere between 20% and 30%. I've not seen any reliable evidence that would place the rate of infidelity even close to 70%. Certainly not 90%... Its rather telling that you have to literally edit and cut w…
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 08:43 AM
2

Lol, you know reddit still keeps the thread with a visible tag saying: Comment deleted by user 7 hours ago Why did you do that? Lol, we both know why you did it. You keep accusing me of lying, and now you're starting to delete your own comments to try and save face? You got caught out bro, and now you're trying to flush the evidence... But the internet doesn't forget faggot. When you start purging your own comments to try and cover up your blatant dishonesty, its clear what you are, and what thi…
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 08:35 AM
4

Lol, come on faggot. Everyone who sees this can see what its about. You were butthurt, so you made a thread trying to trash me. You even accused me of trying to make monetary gain, even though my channel isn't monetised. This is about petty butthurt revenge because someone on the internets disagreed with you. Over the last decade or so, i've contributed an immence amount to this community. I've spent thousands of hours, producing dozens of hours of videos researching redpill social issues. And i…
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 08:27 AM
2

Research paper (on the 70-90%) or GTFO.
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 08:23 AM
3

Also your claim of "20-30% women cheat" I never made this claim. Your beating a straw-man here. I said that based on the evidence we have, the rates of infidelity would probably be closer to 20-30% than they would be to 70-90% Here is the quotation of what I LITERALLY said in the original comment: Like i said, based on all the evidence I've seen, the numbers for infidelity would probably lie somewhere between 20% and 30%. I've not seen any reliable evidence that would place the rate of infidelit…
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 12:32 AM
2

Lolwhat? What ad hominem attack? Dude, you literally set the criteria for being a narcissist, by claiming that I couldn't meet your standard of evidence. At this point you have repeatedly failed to show that your own beliefs meet that standard of evidence. This isn't ad hominem. This is literally your own definition being applied... Do you even logic bro?
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 12:26 AM
2

Ok. So by your own admission you're a narcissist then. Good to know. 👍
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 12:19 AM
2

Lol. Are you really this childish? Are you really doing this? Just shut your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears and repeat the mantra "didn't happen"? I gave you a research paper. That is litterally what I did. The link i right there. Now post yours. Show me that your figure of 70-90% meets the same standard of evidence that you're demanded from me. If you can't do so, then it can only be taken as a tacit admission that (by your own criteria) you are a narcissist. Come on mate. I'm waiting.
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 12:15 AM
3

Stop trying to deflect by spamming comments you've already posted. I gave you what you asked for. Now it's your turn. Post your study showing 70-90%
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 12:09 AM
5

Dude. you demanded a study that showed cheating in the range of 20-30%. Here it is (again): https://today.yougov.com/topics/lifestyle/articles-reports/2015/06/02/men-more-likely-think-cheating When it comes to actually doing the deed, however, a fifth both men and women (21% and 19%, respectively) say that they have cheated on a partner. Now please present your study which shows a range of 70-90%. You demanded that I meet your standard of evidence. I posted a study (despite youre contiued attemp…
/r/MGTOW08/10/20 12:01 AM
6

Lol? What lies? I'm asking you to support your assertion of 70-90%, by the same standard of evidence that you demanded of me. You demanded. I delivered. Now its your turn. Stop being a coward. Stop deflecting. Either present your research study showing 70-90% or admit you were full of shit and just making up numbers based on nothing.
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 11:49 PM
5

Lol, can't be bothered crafting proper replies to a guy who's desperately spamming his on thread with the same comment https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/j5vfqf/exposing_this_fraud_mgtow_youtuber_who_is_most/g7zle0m?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 11:33 PM
6

Lol Don't trust a word that comes out of his filthy mouth. Desperately pleading with people not to listen to me, but thinks I'm the one in "total damage control mode". You know the funniest thing about all this, is that its becoming crystal clear, that your own beliefs, don't even meet your own standard of evidence that you claim makes me a narcissist (well, i think you meant to call me a "solipsist" but you're a bit of a potato brain...) So how about it? You demanded and I delivered. I gave you…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 11:32 PM
5

Alas, it's wonderable who is on a public little temper tantrum Lol, you made this whole thread to try and publicly bash me for disagreeing with you faggot. Not the other way around :)
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 11:23 PM
5

So show me yours. Stop talking shit and present your research study saying 70-90%. Show that you're not a narcissist too by your own standard. Show me the money. Data or GTFO.
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 10:00 AM
5

Research paper saying 1 in 5 (ie 20%): https://today.yougov.com/topics/lifestyle/articles-reports/2015/06/02/men-more-likely-think-cheating I showed you mine. Now show me yours... Show me your research paper saying its 70-90% which was your original assertion that started this whole discussion of infidelity rates. Present your counter evidence showing that it's 70-90% guy. Stop talking shit, and put your money where your mouth is. Justify your position. I mean, if this is the standard of evidenc…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 09:25 AM
5

Lol no. You claimed the rate was 70-90%, which is why I said "data or GTFO". Nice try though.
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 09:24 AM
4

Research paper saying 1 in 5 (ie 20%): https://today.yougov.com/topics/lifestyle/articles-reports/2015/06/02/men-more-likely-think-cheating I showed you mine. Now show me yours... Show me your research paper saying its 70-90% which was your original assertion that started this whole discussion of infidelity rates. Present your counter evidence showing that it's 70-90% guy. Stop talking shit, and put your money where your mouth is. Justify your position. I mean, if this is the standard of evidenc…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 09:06 AM
8

Right... So you're going with the creationist argument of "Show me the missing link, or evolution didn't happen"... Expected as much. I linked my sources which included research papers (lol you've yet to even link the anecdotal Facebook post you put so much weight in) I showed my calculations, for anyone to cross check and do themselves. You can't do the same because you've got nothing... 70-90%? Your original comment and the numbers you matter-of-factually asserted, which stated this whole thin…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 02:55 AM
8

I said that base on the numbers we do have from researchers, the rates are likely closer to 20-30% than your spurious assertion based on literally nothing that the rate is 70-90%. I linked my sources. I showed my calculations. Please, show the sources and calculations for how you came up with those numbers. Your numbers that this entire subsiquent discussion has been about (despite you're constant desperate attempts at misdirection and taking me out of context)
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 02:31 AM
6

Sigh... Data is an examination of reality you tard. You falsely quoting "Data > reality" to me doesn't even make sense. But hey, whatever gets you to sleep at night knowing that there are people out there who don't blindly believe your 70-90% nonsense 👏👏👏
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 02:21 AM
7

What deflection? You're the who created a thread to bash me, with an out of context screenshot, because I disagreed with your spurious claim that 70-90% of women cheat... Why do you keep trying to spin this? Why don't you just tell people to go and read the original discussion thread? Is it because you're scared of what they might see? Are you scared that they might see what I actually said. Are you scared that they might see that what you're really buthurt about is this: Like i said, based on a…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 02:09 AM
2

Right. I take the data even if its flawed. Because it's still better than your position of "I feel this, therefore its true"
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 01:53 AM
6

Lol, seriously man? You're going to make that claim after you're last comment which contained such gems as: He thinks that being in the basement of his mama playing video games or whatever he does and having no real life confrontations with adulterous women at least at a highly substantial level and not the mild level which pretty much every guy had had, will get him to know how much women cheat just by searching for some studies!! Honestly, what are you hoping to achieve with this public little…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 01:36 AM
4

Mate... This all started because you mater-of-factually claimed that 70-90% of women cheat. And somehow that isn't bullshit because "reasons"? Because you saw some post on facebook, and your PUA homies on TRP told you so? Come on man... This is just getting sad. Like i originally said to you, based on the best (albeit flawed) information we currently have, the rate of infidelity is probably closer to 20-30%. There is no data that I've see which would justify an assertion that the rate of infidel…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 01:31 AM
5

Here's a crazy idea: How about you stop trying to spin this petty BS, and just direct people to go and read the original conversation. I mean, I linked it right there at the top... If people just go and read the original conversation you'll be totally vindicated in everything you're currently trying to bash me with right? Problem bro?
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 01:16 AM
2

Sure. And like i said, when there's fresh data that gives us a better picture of the issue, I'll be the first to update my position. But based on the best data we have right now (flawed as it might be) the rate is probably closer to 30% than 90%. They may cheat more than we both might think, but without new data it's baseless to speculate.
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 01:09 AM
2

Ok?
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 01:04 AM
5

I'll freely acknowledge that people lie. I never said otherwise.
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 01:01 AM
2

Men cheat as well. And the NAWALT thing is a phrase that should be taken as a grain of salt. It was actually baffling to me that the OP argued that the existence of the term AWALT proves that all of women cheat. It's kindof a euphemism. When people say AWALT what they really mean is that "All women are capable of cheating, and enough women do cheat, that an expectation of fidelity in a long-term relationship is unreasonable". Ie your prospective wife might not cheat, but its probably not worth t…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 12:55 AM
7

I'll be honest, I don't think that's a reasonable stance to take. Its a popular phrase, but it isn't how we understand most things in the world. In fact even in the majority of legal cases "beyond a reasonable doubt" is not actually the standard used. The question isn't about whether women cheat. True or false... Well the answer is "true", we know they do "beyond a reasonable doubt". The question however is how much do they cheat. Our data set is imperfect, but looking at the question as a gradi…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 12:48 AM
7

And if you read the original discussion, despite the OP's obsessive denial this survey was not the only source I linked. I also brought up the rates of non-paternity, which are (as you would say) based on carefully observed facts (via genetic testing). Using these numbers as a baseline and working backwards, the rate of cheating would still appear far lower than the OP's claim. Again, the data is imperfect, but if we're going to say anything about this subject at all, imperfect data its a better…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 12:38 AM
7

Yes. The field of physics is more accurate. My point was that even physics isn't 100% accurate. The fact that it isn't 100% accurate doesn't make it 100% worthless either. Relationship stats from psych studies are imperfect, but they're the best we've currently got. If we're going to make any estimation about certain relationship factors, then we have to start with somewhere.
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 12:31 AM
5

They can be unreliable and misleading. But they're also the best we've got. Certainly better than claims based on nothing more than "muh feelz" But that goes for anything. Even theoretical physics. Einstein's theory isn't perfect as it doesn't explain the quantum level, but it still has more explanatory power than Apollo pulling the sun across the sky in his chariot. We do the best we can with what we've got. When we get new better information, we update our model of the world. And much to the c…
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 12:21 AM
5

Questionable data indeed. I would suggest you verify this particular source. It's rather telling that he's created a thread, and posted an out of context screenshot to try and publicly bash me for disagreeing with his assertion (based on no data... not even the "questionable" kind) that the rates of infidelity are 70-90% I will do what the OP didn't and actually link to the original discussion thread. I'd highly suggest going and having a quick look at what was actually said, rather than taking …
/r/MGTOW07/10/20 12:03 AM
5

I never said the numbers were perfect. The point I made was that based on the best data we currently have, the rate was likely far lower than the 70-90% linkinway was claiming. Look dude, there is a reason why this guy posted an out of context screenshot, instead of linking to the original discussion. Frankly the same reason he made this petty thread to try and publically bash me for disagreeing with him in the first place. Unlike the OP I've actually posted the link to the original conversation…
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 11:54 PM
4

The data I presented is imperfect, I'm not denying that.... But it is the best data that we currently have on the subject. And that data places the rates of infidelity far lower than the 70-90% figure linkinway fabricated based on literally nothing more than his experiential feelings. Also, despite his obsessive denial, that survey study was not the only data I presented to arrive at an estimate of 20-30% (which is still an extremely high figure). Furthermore, please note that the point linkinwa…
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 11:33 PM
8

All good. TFM and I disagree on a lot of political and social issues (hence the response videos we make to each other) but we're still on good terms and occasionally chat on discord.
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 09:52 AM
6

Yeah. I think it was DDJ but I didn't follow the drama. I have no idea what their falling out was over.
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 09:44 AM
5

Here is the discussion for full context https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/j4a69m/77_of_indian_wives_cheat_hindi_mgtow_india/g7ibceh?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 09:18 AM
18

As a request to any of the mods who might review this; I would ask that you don't delete this thread or any comments on here for the sake of context. Let them stand on their own merit, and let others be the judges of the situation for themselves.
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 09:03 AM
19

Jesus fuck dude... you still can't let this go? First of all, basically everyone knows that my channel is one of the few large channels that is not, and never will be monetised. So your accusation of fleecing the community for money is BS from the start... For anyone who's interested, here is the thread for full context on what was being discussed (rather than the very selective screenshot he's posted here, which only shows me having to correct this retarded on the actual numbers, because he had…
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 08:58 AM
9

Wha? TFM and I are on good terms. What are you talking about?
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 08:37 AM
19

FYI, my channel is not, and never will be monetised.
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 08:33 AM
16

I made a video about this once. Women are attracted to the "alpha traits" displayed by the rebel/badboy archetype. But then when they're in a relationship family comes first, she tries to domesticate him. If she succeeds, she may end up with a compliant husband/father-to-her-children, but she's basically beaten all the alpha traits out of him that she was sexually attracted to in the first place. I've seen it happen first hand to a number of my friends, who once married, were forced to trade in …
/r/MGTOW206/10/20 08:29 AM
1

From the guy who's only argument is to call me a white knight 👏👏👏
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 09:58 AM
1

Yeah.... it's 19%. However I originally said around 20%. I was simply pointing out that like retard you hadn't read what was written. My position hasn't changed. Unlike the guy who originally claimed 70-90%. Then changed to "all bachelorette parties" because some Facebook post said so. To no evidence for infidelity at all... Geez, talk about damage control :)
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 09:48 AM
1

Lol. What damage control? I'm just pointing out that you didn't even bother reading the articles, or what I originally wrote apparently. The article did not claim that 20-30% of women admitted to cheating. So clearly you didn't read that. And then you claimed that "the only fact you gave was that 19% women confessed cheating", which isn't even something I said, until I had to correct you, on the article that you didn't bother to fucking read in the first place.... And now you want to pretend tha…
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 09:28 AM
1

Lol... "the only fact you gave was that 19% women confessed cheating" Well, one of the facts that I gave was that "around 20% of Americans surveyed actually admitted to cheating". It made up 1 of 11 paragraphs that comprised that post... But After all, it seems that you cant read... so... sure, whatever little lies makes you feel comfortable inside. Bye Falicia...
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 09:20 AM
18

Riiiiiiight... Because Tony Montana was representative of "inclusion and tolerance" in the early 80s...
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 08:33 AM
1

LOL... Just can't leave it alone can you mate... Actually if you'd bothered to read the fucking article, you'd have seen that 19% of women confessed that they cheated. And that was only one source out of several I presented which I used to formulate the range of 20-30%. You hand a fucking retard information on a silver platter, and the dumb cunt still can't read... Bye Falicia...
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 07:55 AM
1

Lol, great comeback. But what happened to "Yea, it's won't be replying anymore"
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 03:47 AM
1

No, lets be clear about this. Your feelz are good enough. You don't actually have data.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 03:43 AM
1

Not hard-data. Not an argument. Try harder.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 03:40 AM
1

Lol, precisely proving your ignorance about what "facts" are. "you asked for "hard data", and that's reasonable, so it was provided" Lol are you fucking retarded or something? No. You haven't provided jack shit. Sofar you still haven't even linked the one anecdotal Facebook comment you claim to have (which incidentally would not prove anything about society's general rates of infidelity, so I don't even know why you keep bringing it up). Hearsay, experiential feelz, and random anecdotes from Fac…
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 03:35 AM
1

Lol, thought you "Won't be replying anymore"? Oh and data or GTFO. "I have lurked around many internet forums" "I have come across several many women who said" "I know a guy who came across a few strippers once" The only thing you've "totally confirmed" here, is that you're an idiot who doesn't understand how facts work.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 03:02 AM
1

Then you shouldn't have any trouble providing the hard data that "totally confirms" this. Oh, you're full of shit? Yeah, that's what I though.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:44 AM
1

Well, I didn't say anything before, but at the very least, linking to the evidence you claim to have would be a start (but hey, tards gunna tard). But in case you weren't following the discussion thus far, a single Facebook comment where some women relays a bachelorette party anecdote, is insufficient data to extrapolate to a broad rate of infidelity among the general population. The fact that women cheat isn't in question here, so I fail to understand what you hope to prove by linking a single …
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:36 AM
1

Lol, you keep saying that, but it doesn't make it true. There is evidence for infidelity. As i said, it just happens to be evidence that contradicts your feelz-based worldview.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:30 AM
1

No. I'm not forgetting the 70-90. You made this claim. There is no evidence for it.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:27 AM
1

Dude. Reality is not an "established narative". I'm sorry that reality hurts your feelings by not conforming to your unfounded beliefs, but as I said, them's the breaks.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:22 AM
1

Then why did you say it was 70-90% retard? There is data. Its just happens to be data that yo don't like. As I said, like a basic-bitch feminist, you are opting for "feelz over realz" because that data conflicts with your anecdotal ideological worldview.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:21 AM
1

Then provide better data, or GTFO.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:12 AM
1

Lol, you mad bro?
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:12 AM
1

Lol, lets be honest here. The data is not a sham. The problem is that like a basic-bitch feminist, the data hurts your fragile feelings. No data-set is perfect, we do the best we can to examine the world, and try to . But i suspect no data-set will ever be good enough for you, because "feelz over realz". "Putting a number based on flawed data, only makes you a zealot" Are you really trying to do the "boing-flip" here? Dude, you made a specific claim. You have no basis to make the claim. Based on…
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 02:07 AM
1

Lol, what you just said doesn't even make sense. Based on the evidence we do have, the range seems to fall between 20-30%. Those literally are the numbers. With new evidence those numbers can be adjusted. But until there is new evidence, you're not justified in making up whatever nonsense you like because it makes you feel good...
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:59 AM
1

No. It's the best data we currently have. Until new data arises (and feel free to present some) that is the best we can say about the situation.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:55 AM
1

Lol. You mean those that rely on what little evidence we do have available, as opposed to just inventing whatever fake nonsense that makes them feel good 👍
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:48 AM
1

Your appeal to belief without evidence. Ie "faith". Are you really this obtuse?
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:48 AM
1

Spoken like a true religious zealot.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:44 AM
1

Also: "no one will agree on basis of what you're concluding it to be 30%, no one in MGTOW or TRP" Well I can't speak for TRP. I have less to do with them. They do occasionally make interesting points, although I don't particularly approve of their lionisation of pussy acquisition. Regardless I run one of the largest MGTOW channels on youtube, where I discuss this kind of statistical data all the time, so I think you might be wrong about "no one in MGTOW" agreeing with me... Just saying...
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:38 AM
1

Lol. Dude.... dude... "For narcissists their own reality is reality" That is literally your whole argument. I provide third party statistical data from studies, and you say it doesn't count because it goes against your personal anecdotal experiences... Seriously guy, what the fuck are you even thinking at this point?
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:32 AM
1

Lol, what does any of this have to do with narcissism? This is about reality. "This is something that has no evidence at all" Then how can you claim it's 70-90% you retard? If this has "no evidence at all" then I would be equally justified saying that its only 5%... Look, you made a specific claim about the rate of infidelity among the general population. You have no evidence (data) to back up your position. The best available evidence (data) that we do have, places the rate much lower than your…
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:26 AM
1

Lol, come on dude: "And, as I said I myself have a lot of experience" "t's not beliefs, it's experience, which you don't have at all." "You don't seem to have much experience in the game?" "get out, experience the night life, sleep with many women, you will get to know the real life and not just studies" I get that you can't provide actual evidence (because you just made those numbers up), but at least have the fucking spine to stand by the "feelz over realz" arguments you have made.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 01:06 AM
1

Sure. If you conflate the words "disloyal" and "cheating". Here in reality, there are a lot more ways women can be disloyal than just cheating. Also, you keep coming back to the "female confessions". Not withstanding the irony that your entire position is based on female confessions you claim to have read on facebook, that wasn't the only evidence i provided. In fact that paragraph only made up about 10% of the post. Seriously guy. Believe whatever you want. But if you expect me to believe you, …
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 12:59 AM
1

You have not provided sources. You have provide hearsay and personal anecdote. You made a specific claim. You stated that the rate of infidelity is "anywhere between 70-90%" I asked you to provide credible sources to justify these specific numbers. At this point it is very clear that you are incapable of doing that. All you've got is your personal "feelz" and when presented with actual evidence like survey studies and genetic studies looking at non-paternity events, your belief is that those don…
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 12:54 AM
3

Sorry, but you lost the right to make this complaint when you responded "Oh my God, how blue pilled are you?" And sticking to the "actual discussion" provide some sources to justify your position or GTFO.
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 12:36 AM
3

Why are you spamming quotes of yourself that I've already responded to? How about you provide some sources to justify your position, or GTFO
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 12:33 AM
3

Sorry, but argument ad populum is not valid. And I've been involved in the MGTOW community for about 10 years now... so... what? I guess my experience trumps your experience? And I didn't say that "most women are loyal to their husbands", I said that based on the available evidence, the rate of infidelity is probably between 20-30%. Just because a woman hasn't gone to the extent of cheating, doesn't mean she's necessarily loyal to her husband. Same goes for divorce. The fact that the divorce rat…
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 12:31 AM
3

LOL. You have no idea what my experience is. I've slept with women. I've slept with married women. I am well aware that women cheat. But personal experience and anecdotes do not count as actual evidence when you want to make specific claims about the rate of infidelity among the general population. You keep invoking your personal experience and anecdotal opinions posted to TRP as if those count as credible facts... Sorry, but your "feelz" aren't good enough to justify the specific number range y…
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 12:25 AM
3

I'm not blue pill. But I'm not a retard who invents fake numbers, and relies on personal anecdote to support my position either... Sofar you've presented nothing beyond "muh feelz" to support the specific 70-90% range you're claiming, so i reiterate: Provide some sources to actually justify your position, or GTFO. I really don't care that TRP would laugh at the actual facts, and AWALT is not a valid argument or evidence that proves your position either. Its a catchphrase. It also wasn't "invente…
/r/MGTOW05/10/20 12:02 AM
1

I know you said "body weight" but if you can get your hands on one, I'd highly recommend kettle-bells as being the best home workout. Additionally they take up very little space to store, and you only need a few square meters of space in your lounge room to work out. Personally I do the simple sinister routine, which is mostly made up of two handed swings and Turkish getups. If you do decide to get one, don't make the mistake that most people do. Go heavier. 20kg swings and 16kg getups is a good…
/r/MGTOW04/10/20 11:46 PM
5

Sorry, but they guy who's only point of reference is hearsay from unverified anecdotes on a random Facebook page, doesn't get to complain about published survey studies... Provide a better source or GTFO.
/r/MGTOW04/10/20 11:28 PM
6

Lol, no. No you did not give sources. You claimed to have read some unverified anecdotes on a Facebook page. That is not a source buddy... This is a source: https://today.yougov.com/topics/lifestyle/articles-reports/2015/06/02/men-more-likely-think-cheating It is a survey study which shows that around half of all Americans have thought about cheating, that that around 20% of Americans surveyed actually admitted to cheating These are also sources: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7881652…
/r/MGTOW04/10/20 11:52 AM
3

I did not ask for anecdotes about your friends, or unnamed strippers who claim to sleep with a lot of their clients. I asked for sources to justify the very specific (and very high) percentage range that you gave.
/r/MGTOW04/10/20 10:52 AM
10

So... You wanna rename the subreddit to virtue-signal normies that you aren't "toxic" like those other evil men who need to be thought-policed? Good one... You see that description box on the right hand side where it says: "Of my own accord I will not Serve." MGTOW is defined in r/MGTOW2 as: Men walking away from marriage and other relationships with women that subject them to the laws of a gynocentric court." This... This mentality in-and-of-itself is what gets MGTOW branded as "toxic". Rename …
/r/MGTOW204/10/20 10:27 AM
3

"it's anywhere between 70-90%" What are you basing that on? If you've got sources I'd love to see them, because based on all the information I've seen its more like 20-30% (which is still incredibly high)
/r/MGTOW04/10/20 08:45 AM
7

I get on fine with my mum (as long as we don't talk politics). I get on fine with females at work too. Perhaps this is a bit of compartmentalisation, but I don't really consider either category to be "women" (at least in so far as it's usually discussed by MGTOW). I consider them "genetic relatives" and "co-workers". I've said this before, but it boils down to common interests and goals, which obviously exist between relatives and co-workers regardless of gender. Outside of that however, I don't…
/r/MGTOW04/10/20 08:41 AM
13

FYI, this financial year DuckDuckGo donated USD$25,000 to the "Algorithmic Justice League". https://duckduckgo.com/donations And yes, they are every bit as bad as they sound... https://www.ajl.org/
/r/MGTOW04/10/20 08:14 AM
19

To clarify, the news article is saying that "In India, 77% of wives who cheat on their husbands, do so because of boredom" not that "77% of all wives in India are cheating" That is a fairly major distinction. This is the original news article (that the guy didn't actually link in his video) https://newsable.asianetnews.com/gallery/lifestyle/indian-wives-cheat-out-of-boredom-most-unfaithful-women-live-in-bengaluru-mumbai-kolkata-qbg6t Recently, an extra-marital dating app, Gleeden, conducted a su…
/r/MGTOW03/10/20 11:41 AM
1

The first study was 552 subjects, which is pretty standard for a psych study. The second study was 2180 subjects which is actually pretty large. And essentially confirmed the results of the first study. These I just two studies which I pulled in a couple of minutes to post here. There are many more studies that confirm these same results. ​ Sorry, but these studies are in fact good enough to show us that there is a strong statistical correlation between body modification (tattoos and piercings) …
/r/MGTOW229/09/20 02:04 AM
11

I've seen an increasing number of female confessions like this. I've never seen the same sentiments posted by a man. Take care gentlemen.
/r/MGTOW27/09/20 10:08 PM
2

I think I've made my position on the "Marxist cultural war" pretty clear over the years. Obviously I don't think that is the root cause of society's problems... Not sure if you actually watched the video to the end, but the point of bringing it up was to contrast the fact that the mainstream views violent Maxist street riots as A-OK, but MGTOW saying mean things about women online is toxic and has to be stopped.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 06:54 AM
12

FYI https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12042538/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140197105000837
/r/MGTOW221/09/20 06:24 AM
1

That's just one of Stardusk's mannerisms. He's refered to Barbarossa the same way.
/r/MGTOW219/09/20 10:30 PM
2

CS MGTOW is not dead
/r/MGTOW219/09/20 10:09 AM
1

yes
/r/MGTOW22/03/20 11:52 AM
2

Men will literally die for women they don't even know. I'm not saying its rational, but unfortunately it is reality. It's not uncommon that the desire for sex (and by proxy reproduction) will override basic survival instinct. Don't hate Maslow, hate the game.
/r/MGTOW22/03/20 10:46 AM
3

It's behind a paywall, but did you bother reading what was available on the page? 60/40 infection rate, and of those infected 70/30 death rate.
/r/MGTOW21/03/20 02:37 AM
4

Women pioneered the field of computer technology Very first sentence of the article. We're off to a rocky start people...
/r/MGTOW14/03/20 10:22 PM
20

I love the tip-toing and the jazz fingers as they're running away. This is why children shouldn't play with fire.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/20 11:05 AM
10

Illness hits men harder? #WomenMostAffected
/r/MGTOW14/03/20 10:54 AM
93

Do you feel so much safer now?...
/r/MGTOW14/03/20 10:15 AM
4

Birds Of Prey has manged to not just do well, but be financially strong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birds_of_Prey_(2020_film)) Estimated production budget was $82–100 million, and typically you have to double that figure to account for the studio's advertising campaign. So with a worldwide box-office take of $197.8 million they would only just be breaking even. Even though it was labeled a bomb, it's still the 4th highest-grossing movie of 2020 so far Context matters... a) As stated above, be…
/r/MGTOW14/03/20 02:15 AM
11

Real news in a few years? Ummm, you realise that Harvard has a Gender Studies department now right? https://wgs.fas.harvard.edu/ That means they already are offering Four-Year degrees in "Feeling Oppressed", and have been doing so for quite some time... That moment when you realise the world is exactly as crazy as a the fake internet parody was trying to make out.
/r/MGTOW12/03/20 09:40 AM
8

One of the article's links to an earlier article is even more telling: CBC News - Firing of CP Rail conductor over social media posts shows how women in the workplace are expected to conform Yes, how dare women in the workforce be "expected to conform" to their employer's code of conduct, and not bring them into disrepute by violating email and social media policy...
/r/PussyPass21/02/20 11:57 PM
5

I was recently reading some studies on the Locus of Control. Unsurprisingly there are sex differences. Men see themselves as having a greater level of control over their lives, whereas women see more things being a result of "fate". If this graphic game from an article or something, are you able to post a link to the original?
/r/MGTOW21/02/20 11:09 PM
35

Ok. It won't look good in court, but I have two questions: 1) Literally surrounded by a gang of youths at night and being accosted as this guy is, what would you do in the same situation? He pushes someone back, they advance on him, and he defends himself. 2) Ok, so she's apparently 11, she's a minor, she's not legally accountable... Right, so where are her fucking parents? Where are her legal guardians? Why is an 11 year old allowed out at night, with a fucking street gang, harassing strangers?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 10:41 AM
1

OZY OZY OZY! oh oh oh...
/r/MGTOW21/02/20 10:21 AM
8

Impossible? I have a cock and balls... You have nothing... Please explain the mechanics of its "impossible" for you to "ware pants"... The only reason you don't want to wear pants, is because they don't show enough skin. Pants "sexualise" your body? Come the fuck on now. What kind of upside-down fantasy reality are you living in.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 10:05 AM
2

Right... Because 2 year olds talk about Evolution, Genetics, Psychology, Politics, Sociology, Ideology, Religion, Transhumanism, Futurism, Etc.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_wOBIrRPF8 Yikes, you sound like a retard who enjoys reality TV and gossip magazines...
/r/MGTOW21/02/20 09:13 AM
5

I dunno man. I'm not saying your assessment of them is wrong. I think they are simply assessing men on the basis of extractable resources. However they claim to be doing this as a method to gauge long term relationship compatibility (effectively a shit test). I would say there is a contradiction between those two goals. As I responded to DanZagnut above, women all want to fuck chads. They do. That's what they're ultimately attracted to. But the long-term results of FDS are literally going to fil…
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 11:35 PM
13

I don't think so. Even to gold-diggers that is still a "Low Value Man". Its a loser asking to be taken advantage of. Pussybegging orbiters like that are a means for gold-diggers to make easy money, but that doesn't mean she's "attracted" to him. She still wants to be fucking a chad (and probably is on the side).
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 10:38 PM
5

"When Mikaela revealed her new career path to her father-who adopted her in 1996-and his wife Kate Capshaw, the couple was reportedly "intrigued" by the decision, not upset." That's kinda funny, considering the guy had his studio art department airbrush clothes onto Drew Barrymore's 1995 PlayBoy photo shoot, and then sent them to her with a note that read "Cover up".
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 10:10 PM
48

This is what confuses me so much about FDS. Their core philosophy seems completely contradictory. Their idea of a "High Value Man" is basically a textbook pussy-begging simp. A beta orbiter, who shells out thousands of dollars on a woman, while she strings him along like a chump for months without sex (to supposedly "gauge" his commitment level)... Sorry, that is not "High Value" behavior. That is by definition desperate, and dare i say self-loathing.
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 10:00 PM
26

Why am i suddenly reminded of india... https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sex-on-false-promise-of-marriage-is-rape-supreme-court/article26831183.ece
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 10:27 AM
13

Hmmm... Because "People Services" is so much more inclusive than "Human Resources". We wouldn't want any of the non-humans at the organisation to feel excluded.
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 10:10 AM
6

Doesn't want to tell the prof. Happy to tell people online resulting in 82k likes and 5k retweets... Ummm? Thanks for the overshare?...
/r/MGTOW18/02/20 01:48 PM
5

Oh my god. That was fantastic.
/r/MGTOW18/02/20 11:58 AM
6

That actually wasn't two separate talks. HuMAN's recording software fucked up half way through, and he posted what he had before i told him i was recording the conversation as well, and thus had the second half of it. My next video is probably going to take a little bit. The script is currently 33 pages long, so i either have to cull some of it, or its going to be a couple of months production.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/20 10:15 AM
7

Yah
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/20 07:44 AM
7

Thanks bro
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/20 02:48 AM
8

Do you have a link to the original article?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/20 01:34 AM
2

I hate going to the movies. I have a projector at home. If I want to watch a movie, i do it in the comfort of my own loungeroom with a glass of whiskey.
/r/MGTOW17/02/20 01:25 AM
30

Back in 2012 I was on a trip in Darwin on my own. I went to a fancy seafood restaurant by the waterfront, and ordered an NT Mud Crab which cost me close to AUD$80 (at the time the AUD was higher than the USD). I didn't feel awkward. I was fine... You know why? Because I don't give a shit. I actually did it for me... Honestly I wouldn't order it agian, but it was worth it for the experience, and i don't regret it. LOL US servicemen who where there actually asked to take a photo of my plate becaus…
/r/MGTOW16/02/20 12:01 PM
48

If I'm not mistake Rolo came up with the idea of "marriage game". The idea that you have to constantly "game" your wife to stop them from leaving you... Can you imagine living like that? Can you imagine having to jump through those hoops for any one of your male friends? Fuck that; That is some toxic relationshit right there.
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 03:24 PM
16

When men stop wanting to get laid... so i guess never.
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 11:33 AM
87

We should start a betting pool on how badly its going to crash.
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 11:11 AM
5

Are you good? Why are you spending money on girls like this in the first place?
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 08:35 AM
5

Best quote of the article - women most effected: The guidelines can be useful for setting boundaries, but they can become oppressive to women, too
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 03:40 AM
3

💯
/r/MGTOW09/02/20 11:42 PM
1

I discussed it in a recent video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx-3lK_6ZQc According to the 2007 study that i referenced titled "Child murder by mothers: patterns and prevention" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2174580/ When a young child is murdered, the most frequent perpetrator is a victim's parent or stepparent (1). Rates of infanticide parallel suicide rates rather than murder rates (2). The risk of being a homicide victim is highest during the first year of life (3-5). Thoug…
/r/MGTOW09/02/20 11:18 PM
4

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/well/mind/is-sex-by-deception-a-form-of-rape.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7655815/How-soon-criminal-offence-lie-trying-romantic-partner.html https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/the-mysteries-love/201712/rape-deception ??? Oh wait, no... sorry... it only counts as rape if men misrepresent themselves... carry on everyone.
/r/MGTOW09/02/20 02:33 PM
77

You jest, but this does in fact appear to be "ladylike" behaviour...
/r/MGTOW09/02/20 12:35 PM
3

I dunno man. I just pulled up one of my videos, and the first video of mine that appears in the "suggested videos" sidebar list is buried 12 places down.
/r/MGTOW03/02/20 11:22 AM
1

Anyone got a link to the original source for this?
/r/MGTOW02/02/20 06:28 PM
1

On this we agree. I don't think that's really the case. You spent three whole paragraphs before that arguing the exact opposite. No kidding, what you've written are the same arguments I'd expect to hear from SJWs crying that their fragile feelings being protected as well. Honestly, the argument in the OP is sloppy as fuck. If it was the exact same attempt at "satire" made by a feminist, arguing on the basis of emotions, and conflating murder with some "woke" transgression against their feelings,…
/r/MGTOW26/01/20 01:00 PM
1

Ok... And is that what you'd do? Would you be out in the streets torturing and murdering people for the lolz, if the laws didn't tell you otherwise? Honestly, this is the same nonsense argument I've heard from christians trying to prove the validity of the gospel. Arguing that without god and the bible explicitly telling people what to do, they wouldn't know right from wrong. Its retarded nonsense of the highest order. The reason the world was more violent in the past was because survival was ha…
/r/MGTOW26/01/20 12:57 PM
1

You can use the exact same argument about murder. No. No, I don't think you can. I think it can be easily argued that people are inherently horny. Human's have a sex drive. I think its a stretch to argue that people are inherently murderous. With the exception of a very small number of clinical psychopaths that enjoy torturing others (In fact, that's actually in the satire, not general human nature like you're implying) Not the same thing...
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 09:39 PM
2

I'm sorry, but the legality does matter here. We are talking about a contract here. Marriage is a contract. However it is a fake contract that has zero legal support when it comes to infidelity. People are entering into this fake contract, and then we're going to be surprised when the fake conditions of that fake contract aren't upheld? Especially considering the distinct lack of loyalty that we know women posses (literally one half of this fake contractual partnership) The whole situation is st…
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 09:32 PM
-1

I dunno about that. I think 'degrees' of wrong do matter, which is why i think the satire utterly fails. As i said above, at worst, adultery is a breach of an exclusivity contract. An implied contract that the courts don't even legally recognise as legitimate. And if it is (as you see to agree) predictable behaviour, then its questionable whether such a contract is even reasonable in the first place. Its like bringing a common chimpanzee to a high class dinner party and then getting upset that i…
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 10:23 AM
-8

You call it shitty behaviour. I call it predictable behaviour. In either case; no it isn't fairly obvious, and it's still a bad argument that makes false moral equivalencies.
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 09:36 AM
-13

Some people commit suicide after losing their jobs. Do you also draw a moral equivalency between downsizing someone and murdering them? Should we outlaw making people redundant? My guess would be no. Because men have agency. They have bad days all the time, and its on them to fucking deal with it. It amazes me that MGTOW spends so much time advocating for women to be held accountable for their actions and agency, but then we want to blame women for these kinds of negative actions of men. The tru…
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 09:25 AM
15

This is brilliant. Brought a smile to my face.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/20 05:25 AM
-29

I don't agree with this at all, and I've see it a lot. If your main argument against adultery is to conflate consensual sex between to adults, with a crime (particularly a serious crime like murder) then its not a valid argument.
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 02:56 AM
16

Australia is in the process of introducing laws, whereby misrepresenting yourself is legally conflated as rape... Something tells me this won't apply to the things women do though...
/r/MGTOW23/01/20 09:26 PM
2

I've seen this screenshot reposed around a few times. Does anyone actually have a source for the original article?
/r/MGTOW23/01/20 02:28 AM
2

FYI, 10 years ago there was a similar controversy, where KFC australia had a commercial where an Aussie guy at the cricket got the West Indies supporters to stop being so loud by giving them KFC. https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/kfcs-racist-ad-australian_n_412002?ri18n=true Americans lost their shit, because it was basically a white guy feeding fried chicken to black people (which isn't even a thing here) so the ad got pulled and KFC went into damage control
/r/MGTOW22/01/20 10:06 PM
1

Um... I don't even know what this is supposed to mean. Do you not understand the difference between memes on the internet, and the fact that you actually have to deal with real people in real life?
/r/MGTOW22/01/20 09:49 PM
12

They make up half the population, and the majority of our institutions (both public and private) revolve around keeping them happy... Sorry bud, but we can't talk about the issues men face in this world, without addressing the elephant in the room that is women.
/r/MGTOW22/01/20 01:36 PM
9

Nice.
/r/MGTOW21/01/20 09:30 PM
12

Its a Scooby Doo mystery....
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/20 02:37 AM
1

I use Calvin Kline CK-Be body spray, and I have a small collection of colognes. My favourite right now is the Vera Wang for men. But I use the davidoff cool waters eau de toilette a lot too. Davidoff game was really good but I don't think they make it any more.
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 03:18 AM
1

I honestly don't understand this mentality at all... sure, kids are fucking stupid but they aren't completely unaware. They know what's going on in their own home between their own parents. Personally my homelife improved significantly when my parents finally divorced and we could all stop the pointless charade. Continuing to live a depressive lie "for the kids" is such a fucking copout.
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 05:25 AM
1

Link?
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 05:09 AM
2

"happy wife happy life" as the saying goes....
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 03:10 AM
8

Right, the old "You just haven't met the right woman yet." Thanks for the advice. But I think I'll pass....
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 01:24 AM
8

I would question the motivations for this post. If everyone told her the honest truth I doubt it would matter. I get the impression she has no intentions of changing her ways. Ie she's fishing for positive endorsement of her actions. If she gets the opposite she'll just ignore it. Women are going to women.
/r/MGTOW15/01/20 11:33 PM
2

Councelling women? Lol fuck that. I have no desire or obligation to "fix women". Grow the fuck up and learn to fix your own shit.
/r/MGTOW15/01/20 10:37 PM
30

I don't know if all women are cheaters, all of the time. But every female acquaintance I've known and kept in touch with long term (ie since high-school) has cheated on a partner at some point during that time.
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 07:14 AM
1

I can't really say with the few details you've given, but if you're sure this is going to end badly, it might be worth putting in your resignation before they can "fire" you. It generally looks better for future employment. Also, are there any male managers there who you are on good terms with, that possibly think you're being screwed over? If the answer is yes, make sure you get a reference letter from them. Its good to have a reference from your previous employer, and you don't want it to be t…
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 09:28 PM
2

Would be even more realistic if you could see her three kids in the background.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/20 08:45 PM
5

You know, this could turn out to be an unintentionally excellent outcome for men. Think about it. Men on average are already working many hours of overtime above and beyond their designated work week hours. When men are already working 50+ hours a week, what do they even care if the official work week is reduced to 24 hours instead of 38 hours. In fact, if the same overtime penalty rates per hour apply, then men could potentially make a killing out of this situation. They're going to get an extr…
/r/MGTOW07/01/20 10:33 PM
16

This is something i quickly realised when i approached 30. Single women at that age are just carrying far too much baggage. They either have kids from previous relationships, or are too crazy and irresponsible for any kind of stable relationship where a man wanted kids with them. This literally applies to every woman I've ever know in this age category. Its a damned if you do damned if you don't situation.
/r/MGTOW07/01/20 10:05 PM
14

👍
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 11:49 AM
2

Gentlemen, allow that last paragraph to be permanently imprinted on your mind Have any of you had a hard time transitioning your hubby? Fuck that...
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 11:28 AM
66

I've been around for three and a half decades now. I've seen this happen before. In fact, I was in Jervis Bay for the disastrous 2001 "black christmas" fire season. Peoples memories are short and in 12 months time we'll be hearing all about the brave "men and women" who fought these fires. Mark my words, feminists (and women more broadly) will take their undue credit. Just you wait and see....
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 10:27 AM
2

Up In The Air The Man From Earth
/r/MGTOW01/01/20 09:34 AM
1

50 is hardcore man. I can only do about 4-5 right now.
/r/MGTOW01/01/20 07:59 AM
2

Pay off all my personal loans (sans my homeloan). Finish renovating my house. Start building a share portfolio. By the end of the year I want to be doing 48kg kettlebell swings, and 32kg Turkish getups. 12% body fat.
/r/MGTOW01/01/20 07:57 AM
1

I'm scared that once he finds out he's going to get so much stricter and will stop me from seeing him etc. Wha? Bitch you are 21... what are you even doing still living at home?
/r/MGTOW29/12/19 09:23 PM
26

"Show me a woman with the world stuck to her back, and I'll show you a man who's tired of fucking her" - Barbarossa
/r/MGTOW18/12/19 02:59 PM
7

I think the real lesson to be learned here, is that before she got married, popped out a kid, and become a stay-at-home wife, most guys probably would have considered her a NAWALT unicorn. Hot young woman with an engineering degree? That's kinda rare... But the thing is, they never stay that way forever do they. Women are NAWALT unicorns... right up until they're suddenly not any more... Once she finds a provider workhorse its "gibs me dat success, so I don't have to go back to work"
/r/MGTOW16/12/19 06:11 AM
1

Right... Because apparently divorce law is the problem that caused all of this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wpca1ZDIRQ um no...
/r/MensRights04/03/19 09:57 AM
2

So essentially, you can't tell the difference between judging an individual person, and judging the ideological collection of ideas that a person (or people) might hold... ok... Judging islam, would be like judging feminism (not judging women like you seem to be so upset about). I am critical of both those ideologies. I consider those ideologies to be negative. If an individual or a group of people, profess to follow these ideologies, then i have good reason to judge those people negatively base…
/r/MGTOW19/03/18 01:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter