TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

concerndcitizn Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by concerndcitizn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think the scientific answer is that men have a higher variability of characteristics (google "Variability hypothesis"). In IQ, height, weight, disagreeableness, criminality (and many more), men are more variable. Meaning that while women tend to cluster around the average, you have a significant minority of men at the extreme ends of (almost) any given spectrum. This ends up meaning the majority of the smartest people in the world are men, the majority of the dumbest people in the world are me…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 06:44 AM
1

I don't know if you'll get to read this as it looks like you deleted your account. You are reacting to something he didn't say. Read it again: though men are the overwhelming majority of violent crime victims, congress passes a Violence Against Women Act He said "men are the overwhelming majority of violent crime victims" he DIDNT say "men are the overwhelming majority of DOMESTIC ABUSE victims". I can provide references for men being the majority of victims of violent crimes if you like, but a …
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:24 AM
1

100% agree with that. The reason why men died more often is because of their (and societies) willingness to sacrifice themselves for their family, and the effect is strong enough to massively outweigh any effect having less fragile bodies makes
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:25 PM
1

The children vs women statistic could be due to the fragility of children's bodies. IE more children died in wartime and on the titanic because they have smaller, more fragile, less physically capable bodies, not because of some unconscious bias that favours women over children. Don't fall into the same trap as feminism and see malice under every statistic. ​ Caveat: I didn't make it to the end of this video (Its 1.5hrs long), so Im sorry if Im misrepresenting the author here.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 08:14 AM
9

Dude. Not cool.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 04:24 AM
3

My advice to students faced with questions like this is to use the example of people with a genetic predisposition. eg: people with a genetic predisposition to childhood disease are underprivileged.. etc It neatly sidesteps any arguments of socio economic status, whilst proposing a statistically provable argument.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 10:16 AM
3

> It is the man’s fear of primeval times that he is swallowed up by the woman. lol. At least fear and not arousal is the expected male response. In all honesty, I quite enjoy surrealist art. I like this.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:42 PM
3

> had "sexual relationship" with a female student you spelled "raped a child" wrong
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:34 PM
7

I agree with all your reasoning, but not your conclusion. ​ The percentage of non-reciprocal domestic violence perpetrated by women is probably higher than it was 20 years ago, for all the reasons you presented. If it is in fact higher, it's probably, as you say, due a change in male behaviour rather than a change in female behaviour. ​ Anyway. All conjecture.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:51 AM
1

Masculine Insistence Paradox – a man passionately refuses to share responsibility for the perpetration of sexist narratives and dangerous gender roles and by doing so affirms both Thats not what Joe is doing though. He passionately refuses to share responsibility for the perpetration of sexist CRIMES. Just as Im sure the writer would if we lay the crimes of a few women at the feet of all others. That said, I do indeed passionately refuse to accept that saying "Not all men" is a sexist narrative …
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:13 AM
2

Those slide references don't seem to match that final reference you provided, its not the correct bullitin (17 July vs 22 January) ​ edit: this looks like it https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110220110338/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs09/hosb0209.pdf (page 66) ​ Interesting that men are **more** likely (55%) to be a victim of partner abuse in the most common category: "Kicked, bit or hit you, or threw something at you"
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:53 AM
8

"1 in 5 men, will attack! if provoked"
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:18 AM
1

Stupid Archie, always choosing the crazy brunette. #bettyisbetter
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:26 AM
7

You did the same thing as jake: He does know that he's rich DOES .. DOES know You think president Trump doesn't know he is rich? What? Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:23 AM
7

He does know that he's rich .. read that again He DOES know that he's rich .. You're telling me the man [..] doesn't know he's rich? Erm.. no, he's telling you EXACT OPPOSITE of that. Maybe read the comment you are replying to before spouting vitriolic nonsense and calling them pathetic.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:21 AM
0

[youtube are] pro-forced diversity Forced diversity, I haven't heard that before, its good term for it. Stealing
/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter