TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

confirmedpenguin Archive

View 3 posts and 29 comments by confirmedpenguin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I would both agree and disagree with you on this. It was brought to my attention that not all colleges have this large of a bias. The best tech school such as the ones listed above are the most notable but in general there is a bias of a few percentage points against men in most schools. The trend is greatly minimized and in many cases even reversed against females in humanities and liberal arts colleges. Swarthmore and William and Mary being notable for having larger biases against females. How…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 09:26 AM
1

women are more selective in making applications, and only apply to universities where there is a good chance of gaining admission At colleges like MIT, Caltech, and HMC, no applicant has a good chance of being admitted. Some better than others but since the applicant pool is so qualified some admissions officers have even gone as far to say the selection process is random. Also according to admissions officers I have spoken with, majority of the applicants to these colleges are well qualified. S…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 09:19 AM
1

I looked up the graduation and retention rates at MIT and the evidence shows that women have a higher graduation rate after 6 years than men. http://web.mit.edu/ir/pop/students/graduation_rates.html
/r/MensRights19/01/16 09:09 AM
1

The point isn't comparing the national average to the best. The point is that the national average and standard deviation show that there are more males that have scores at the extreme ends, both higher and lower than female scores. My point in saying this is to disprove your point that the female applicant pool was stronger than the male applicant pool. If males are earning equal or higher scores than females but females have twice the acceptance rate, then it's not a matter of qualification bu…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 08:58 AM
1

The information didn't come from a guy I know. It was from a Stanford admissions rep that came to my school. Also as /u/cmumford said it would require the university to publish SAT scores and applications which would be a breech in privacy. The closest I can offer is the national score distribution by gender. SAT Table 2 Males have an average of 1512 with a standard deviation of 117 while females have an average of 1486 with a standard deviation of 112. Although the averages are pretty much the …
/r/MensRights19/01/16 05:10 AM
1

For the most selective schools only the most qualified applicants even bother to apply. I've heard from an admissions officer 80% of people who applied were qualified in terms of test scores, gpa, etc and it was just a matter of "who would fit". The statistics for test scores and GPA is also feely available if you want to check it out.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 12:35 AM
1

Mentioning test scores is kind of a moot point because for the most selective colleges, only applicants who know they're qualified bother to applying. I've heard from an admissions rep that 80% of people who apply already qualify in terms of scores and GPA. So for the few that got in, male and female, they were definitely well qualified.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 12:29 AM
6

Unfortunately, CDS Initiative doesn't publish all of the data so the data available is published independently by each school. So I guess it is a generalization to say "colleges across the board", but according to the CDS for the colleges I have found, there is definitely a trend of several percentage points of bias against men with major discrepancies being listed above. Generally research universities and tech oriented schools have the bigger biases against males. Liberal arts and humanities o…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:00 PM
1

Well that's the thing. There is no male equivalent.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 07:20 AM
1

Well for the first counter you could just replace that woman with another woman so it wouldn't cost you anymore. As for the second it kind of brings us in circle to the whole reason of why the wage gap doesn't hold up against reason. Feminist use the wage gap as a way of saying women are discriminated against in a worker's perspective yet they don't take into account the employer's perspective. Why would any employer want to pay anyone more? When you look at it as a man gets paid $1.30 to a wome…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:05 AM
2

Try this simple thought experiment. If women were paid 77 cents to a man's dollar then why are companies still hiring men? If a male and a female candidates are equally qualified and have equal credentials, work experience, education, etc why don't employers just take a slice of the pie and hire only women and pay them 77% of a man's paycheck?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:10 AM
4

Would you support a government that holds election and was created by the people? Congratulations! You support the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea). That's what I got out of it.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:12 AM
5

She's allowed to have those views. We've gotten to the point where if you support gender roles then you're a bad person. Who are you to disabuse her of that notion somewhat more... forcefully? A lot of guys want to take on masculine roles. That's perfectly fine. A lot of guys want take on more feminine roles. That's fine too. A lot of guys want to be in between. That's just fine. Same goes for girls. They're living their lives the way the want to. Traditional gender roles aren't the problem. It'…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 02:12 PM
1

Has there ever been one? It tries to correct men to women.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:56 PM
1

So hate your country's government = being smarter? We had it all wrong guys. The conspiracy theorists were right all along. 9/11 was an inside job and the world is run by lizard people.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:30 PM
3

I've got a video idea. Someone walks down an alleyway with a dumpster in it. A crying baby can be heard. The person peers over the lid to see where the baby is and they see a huge mirror. The opposite wall of the dumpster reads "This is what a baby killer could look like." The screen fades to black. Then it reads: x% of child murders were committed by the mother. Anyone is capable of killing kids: Friend, Neighbor, Doctor, Wife, Female oriented job, Female oriented job, Teacher, Lawyer, Female o…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 08:07 AM
1

That's a good point but it sounds like its fighting sexism with sexism. You say girls aren't going into code? Well let's put money into girl's coding programs. You say men aren't becoming nurses? Let's put money into men's nursing programs. If people have a genuine interest then the fact that a field is male of female dominated should make no difference. Also it honestly doesn't matter which gender dominates the field. If 90% of programmers were women but they were doing a hell of a job then tha…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:15 AM
2

I think Google should have encouraged people regardless of gender to make a step towards STEM fields. It's not a matter of getting enough of both sexes involved. It should be about teaching those who want to learn.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:44 AM
1

I actually think that most of these are pretty reasonable. It's not what girls should expect from guys, it's what people should expect from people. There's no problem in a girl wanting a a guy to leave cute notes for her. A lot of guys would find the gesture sweet if their girlfriends left them a note. A lot of this stuff is just basic courtesy. I honestly don't think there's a problem in girls wanting anything in this list, except for a few things, because a lot of guys would like it too.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 08:28 AM
1

I don't think that's necessarily true. I think Men have primarily headed society because men take initiative to lead more often. Also it'd be helpful to show how a matriarchy would be worse than a patriarchy rather than just justifying a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:54 AM
1

No. Do you care that there are both genders inventing machines or running research facilities? I sure don't. I don't care that the laptop I'm typing this on had women and men involved in its production. Do you care if whatever device your typing you response on has had either gender working on it? If you do then you shouldn't. Please enlighten me. I don't understand what is so incorrect about this statement that it would warrant an insult rather than a reply.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 05:04 AM
1

I don't think that a lack of women in tech fields is necessarily a good or bad thing. I don't think people give a damn who draws up the plans for a new computer or is in charge of a research lab. Unless they were clearly and overly misogynistic, probably no one has said I won't buy this product because a women was involved in making it. Education on the other hand is providing role models for our children. If at a young age we taught all children that the female standard for character was the no…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:30 PM
1

Holy shit I never thought about that. But right now it just makes so much sense. Have you ever said that to someone else and gotten back a response? What did they say?
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:56 AM
1

I don't think there are many but I think married couple have lower tax rates. I'm not sure if this is for married couples or couples living together.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:44 AM
1

Your post says his joke got a good laugh from everyone nearby including her. But was there another confrontation afterwards that caused her to become offended? If she thought it was funny there would be no reason to report it. Maybe there was another exchange following the groping that made her uncomfortable so she decided it was best to report all of the encounters.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:35 AM
1

Women have undoubtedly been oppressed throughout the centuries and she's right about that. I think if you wanted to take the contrary route the best you could do is say the oppression women faced wasn't as bad as people talk it up to be today. I think the best argument to make should have been women have been oppressed not at the hands of men but at the hands of people with power. You should have argued it was never men vs women but it was always people with power vs the masses. It was the peopl…
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:16 AM
1

To be honest I think this is a case of Confirmation Bias. You see discrimination against men here because you want to see discrimination of men to argue a point. I'm not saying that this isn't a case of discrimination but judging from the comments some people don't get it or have their own opinions as to why they need a key which makes me think that you would have to be conditioned to see discrimination against men in order to see it here.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:54 AM
1

I know I didn't cover the civil rights movements but the focus of the question was more about this new wave of complaining feminists vs the lack of media coverage on complaining minorities. I know black people have complained but I was pointing out the lack of its coverage by the media today.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:33 AM
1

Well most famous revolutionaries lived during the civil rights movement. They did commendable work but minorities still love in conditions worse than most feminists. There are also a lot of famous suffragettes like Pankhurst and feminists like Woolf. Sorry but I don't see how your response answers the question. I don't see how famous racial revolutionaries vs no famous feminists answers why black people don't as entitled a feminists. My first reply was deleted. This is more or less the same thin…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 12:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter