TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

confrey Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by confrey on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you want to be an ass on top of being sexist that's all you man. But let's get back to this coverture. What version of it would be acceptable to you?
/r/MensRights27/10/19 04:11 PM
1

Alright first of all, if you're gonna make a claim about anything, it's on you to provide the background info if you're asked to do so. Second, coverture seems like a practice that's been largely changed/eliminated to ensure that married women have basic rights and that their legal existence isn't simply absorbed into the husband's. This is more of a practice and has since been overruled by laws in the US. Which version of coverture would you prefer to see? And to go off on your bit about spouse…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 03:49 PM
2

Username is more fitting for OP
/r/MensRights27/10/19 02:34 PM
1

I'll bite. I'd be very interested in seeing what laws say that a married couple is one person.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 02:33 PM
1

It's not a anyone's rights issue. OP is just wildly sexist and wants to find ways to control women. Man's giving all these hypotheticals like "why should I have to share money with a woman who didn't take my name" as if someone will actually marry him when he explains why it's so important to him that they do take his name.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 02:31 PM
3

Get your backwards 200BC views out of here. If people want to keep their pre-marriage names, let them. It's not your concern how they live their lives.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 02:10 PM
3

What exactly is the issue here? That a fictional couple doesn't share the same last name after marriage?
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:40 PM
6

Not to mention a lot of the top comments begin with saying "gentle YTA" or something along those lines. And some of them bring up good points asking if a gang member happened to come from another town, is there a chance his tattoos would be recognized? Just from that risk alone I think should be enough for him to decide that he needs to find a way to cover or remove them for the safety of his family.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 02:05 PM
8

Honestly it's probably not even real so there's no need for anyone to think much of it. How in the hell is someone gonna stand for 6 hours on a flight. If you've been on one you'll know that flight attendants sometimes don't even like you getting up to go to the bathroom much less stand in the aisle for hours at a time. That's sounds like a huge safety violation for them to allow that.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 11:42 PM
2

This is an unfair comparison. In the post where the woman does not want to wear the dress, she offers an alternative that still matches the formal theme of the wedding. In the other post, it did not sound like he was willing to consider any sort of alternative (such as just a shirt and slacks) and if he wore jeans to his own wedding (which is fine cause they both didn't care what he wore), I don't imagine he'd wear anything beyond that to another person's wedding. She is prepared to still be for…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:22 PM
3

OP, I respect that you feel strongly on the abortion issue even if I don't agree with your position. However, posting without understanding the context behind a quote is not the way to go about this. It's lazy, deceitful, and does nothing to further the dialogue around abortion in any constructive way. It immediately invalidates your position if you disregard context and only serves to embolden those who disagree with you.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:11 PM
5

Not to mention that the "joke" he's quoting def comes off as more satire than a serious joke at the expense of the guy who was forcibly catheterized. Like there's legitimate ways to bring attention to the problem, but he seems like the guy who reads articles from The Onion and shares them online thinking they're real
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:41 PM
-1

Plenty share it, they just don't bother bothering with people ignorant enough to believe that higher education is some kind of play to force some political ideology onto our country's youth if what they choose to study isn't directly STEM related. And even then I'm sure plenty of those people will find some way to get upset over having to learn series in Calc 2 or some other nonsense. Maybe they won't like having to share the class with other students, maybe the scary sigma symbol is actually a …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:55 AM
-1

Those classes are taken by plenty of people of all kinds of majors. That's the whole point of general education credits. It gives students the opportunity to delve into a topic they may be interested in regardless if it's their career path or not. I did biochem but took a couple courses on mythology cause we learned a little in high school and I wanted to know more. I now pick up on more references in modern media because of it, learned about another culture, and have interesting stories to shar…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:52 AM
2

It's anti white if you're an individual who doesn't like hearing about the issues other demographics face because you can't be bothered to empathize with those who don't look like you. So really it's anti white if you're anti everything that ISN'T white. Unless the guy who tweeted this is gonna upload the actual curriculum showing that these courses are as sexist and racist as he wants us to believe, I'm gonna stand firm in thinking he's just a barely closeted racist.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:23 PM
3

Look at his other posts. Dude takes way too much issue with people complimenting others on their physical appearance like their face. OP has some problems he needs to work out cause thinking women should date the people they're worried about is deeply concerning and I don't believe for a minute that he would date a not so good looking overweight woman who complains about certain types of men.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 08:32 AM
2

It's neither cause this is painfully fake.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 10:53 PM
-2

Spoilers for the show since idk how to indicate on mobile. The four main female characters went through shit too. Sansa was raped after being married into the family that killed hers. Arya was forced to live as a runaway and go through some brutal stuff for a teenager. Cersei lost all three of her children. Say what you want about her, but Cersei felt genuine love for her children and losing them is traumatic as hell. Dany lost her husband and child to some crazy witchcraft which is again trauma…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:57 AM
5

I think the post just got locked.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 04:50 PM
8

Likely isn't any at all lol. Harry Potter was a phenomenon for a lot of people growing up and even a lot of people who were adults by the time the series ended. It's easy to read, delves nicely into the background of the world it creates (if you read the books, harder to do that with movies), and the movies were made fairly well when you consider the track record of book based movies. In my experience, anyone who makes fun of the franchise is really just looking for an excuse to try to look cool…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/19 10:02 AM
5

I feel like you're just proving my point but ok?
/r/MensRights02/05/19 12:20 AM
7

Does it really make sense for you to say that he's coming from a place of emotion when your response was just a knee-jerk low effort insult?
/r/MensRights01/05/19 11:24 PM
21

Not to mention that kids are pretty creative with bullying other kids. If they can't bully you for one thing, they'll just find something else.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:56 PM
2

Additionally, could an argument be made that by sending multiple humans to the moon, we can learn more about how the human body is affected by being on anything that isn't the Earth? Like at the very least it might be worth doing to see if there are any surprises we need to be aware of (idk what they'd be I'm not a scientist). Plus we'd have to do it anyway if humanity aims to go beyond Earth one day I'd imagine.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 12:53 AM
3

Y'all, OP is trash and should be treated as such until they stop being trash. OP out here tryna hide their sexist comments smh.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 06:52 PM
1

You COULDN'T care less is the phrase, indicating that it isn't possible for you give any fewer than 0 fucks about said topic.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:17 PM
31

OP is the first commenter, so I'm assuming that they were trying to say that men can't come forward and say that they're victims of DV, but the user at the bottom who's disagreeing seems to have read it as OP believes that men can never be a victim of DV for whatever reason. It's pretty open to interpretation just looking at the comment alone though, so maybe those who did downvote misinterpreted as well, but no way to know for sure I guess.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 04:33 AM
2

Nothing here is sexist lol. They're just pointing out that women have certain interactions with other women that men probably don't experience. Men have positive interactions with other men that most women will likely not get to experience too. Let's focus on the real issues please rather than trying to find problems where none really exist.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:06 AM
1

I'm personally also on board with finding a way to give equal reproductive rights to men while also being pro choice. I don't see why we can't have both personally. I think that if the unplanned pregnancy happens, if the woman wants to keep the baby, the father should not be under legal obligation to pay child support. If he chooses to be involved, it is his choice. Likewise, if the woman is ready and willing to be a mother, that is her choice, but it should be made knowing that she will likely …
/r/MensRights24/03/19 07:17 PM
1

I think the biggest concern I have with that bill is that the possibility of a woman not even being aware she's pregnant until that window is over. I'm a guy, and I don't know nearly enough about pregnancy medically as I maybe should, so I don't know how likely it is for a woman to only find out she's pregnant after the heartbeat can be heard. But, from the information I have currently, I can't personally get on board with this if a woman finds out too late and can't get an abortion before she k…
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:26 PM
2

It seems like Mississippi literally just did that. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2019/03/22/mississippi-fetal-heartbeat-law-bans-abortions-after-weeks/ If I misunderstood this article please let me know. But from what I gather, it seems that as soon as you can hear the heartbeat, abortion becomes illegal which apparently can happen relatively early on in pregnancy.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 02:45 PM
5

Basic rundown. The guy in the picture is Judge Brett Kavanaugh who was nominated to the US Supreme Court by President Trump. During the nomination process in which he's pretty much being interviewed for the job, a woman comes forward saying that he assaulted her back in high school and now a couple more women have come forward with more claims of sexual assault by Kavanaugh. Of course with the timing of the allegations, there's the concern that these are false accusations with intent to derail t…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 10:08 PM
2

Yeah in this case I ultimately believe Serena deserved the second and third calls since it's by the book, I don't think calling sexism is a valid way to excuse it. If anything we should use it as a reason to examine the umpire's collectively and try to compare similar situations as much as possible to try to determine a trend, if any. Also I think as far as coaching, I kind of think her coach should suffer more than she does especially because I think that from her perspective she didn't get coa…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:17 AM
-3

It's down voted because it casts possible doubt on Ramos bias or lack thereof. It's a shame that it's being down voted since it just weakens the argument that Ramos didn't do anything wrong in the Serena v Osaka match.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:30 AM
4

I think this is a fair point to consider. Particularly for verbal abuse. One group might get more warnings about their abuse than the other which could possibly explain why the women have such significantly lower verbal penalties. It's still possible that Ramos has a tendency to come down harder on the men, but the level of the verbal abuse is important too I think.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:27 AM
5

You got a direct link to the specific post? Sifting through the top 100 can be pretty ridiculous if we don't know exactly what to search for. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:17 AM
2

Not familiar with Westworld, but I like to think I'm fairly familiar with GoT. SPOILERS ABOUND FOR GoT. Considering the time period the universe of GoT is based upon, it makes sense that a lot of the men in the story are typically in combat roles at some point in the story. So it stands to reason that a good portion of them are injured or killed as a result of it (Stannis, Oberyn, Jeor Mormont, Ramsay, Tyrion is injured, Ned was injured). It just makes sense that they are. As for women, there's …
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:33 PM
1

Also that last line... Jeez... Yeah he didn't even try to hide the hate for women. This is why we can't have nice things
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:04 PM
3

Agreed. This feels more like nice guys or incel complaining than an actual discussion of rights. The low key shaming of women choosing whether or not to be sexually active with multiple people is a pretty clear sign of it.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 02:54 PM
2

Forreal. Everyone in these comments acting like this man is some hero when personally I think he's even worse than the OP in that post. OP is wrong for having cheated, but it takes a sadistic level of hate to do what Jared did. Yes she fucked up their 4 year relationship, but his actions spiraled and affected people who don't seem to have done anything to him and it has affected them all negatively. I'm all for getting revenge, but it should never go beyond the person you're getting back at.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/18 05:12 PM
1

I agree. People like to paint a group they don't particularly understand with a single brush. But the second people try it with a group they belong to, they're so quick to act like it's bad to generalize and will throw out counter arguments.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:25 PM
1

I think you might have confused which person I was talking about. I'm talking about the person who claims the Muslim apologist brigade or something is here.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:22 PM
1

I can't imagine why someone would be so willing to lie about Islam and it's followers to portray them as an all around bad thing. /s
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:56 PM
2

I'm curious to know why you think the person who did the asking out should have to pay
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:47 PM
3

So the idea behind this is that if two people of both sound mind and body willingly have sex with one another, a week later, one of them can decide they no longer consent to the sex that took place a week ago and it now qualifies as sexual assault/rape?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:15 PM
1

I would argue that one can argue that something is the wrong approach while not knowing the correct approach.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 03:56 AM
3

If there's no proof, it would be very difficult to get anything done about this situation. I think at the very least reporting this behavior to the department might be worth it just in case previous complaints have been made, but beyond that you might be shit out of luck.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:39 PM
6

Appearance is completely subjective and when we're considering something as personal as someone's penis, how it looks should be completely up to them. You can always have the procedure performed later on in life if you decide that a circumcised penis looks better to you. But it's important that it be your choice and yours alone. And the cleanliness is not an issue if you just teach your child how to properly take a bath. What health benefits come from circumcision that are so crucial that we nee…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:11 AM
4

It's disturbing that one of your main reasons for cutting skin off the genitals of an infant just so they might have a better sex life with women. What about situations in which the infant grows up with no sexual interest in women? That reason goes completely out the window and you're left with the very very marginal medical benefits (if any) and that's supposed to justify taking a knife to an infant's genitals?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:51 AM
2

The way I see it, if you decide to eat at a restaurant just because it's owned by a woman, it does end up hurting another business that arguably is more deserving of your money based on their quality of service and food. If that business happens to be owned by a man, then yes it would hurt men because you're not gonna buy your lunch twice in a single day. This is not me saying that because it might hurt men, you shouldn't eat at a place owned by a woman. Rather, you should eat at a place whose s…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 03:56 AM
11

I think the article mentions that he's not comfortable kissing someone he isn't in a relationship with and that he planned on saving the first kiss for someone very special to him. That should be plenty for someone to realize a surprise kiss would be an unwelcome advance. If I happen to have misunderstood what the article said, someone jump in and correct me and I'll edit this comment, but if that's what happened, what Katy did could absolutely be seen as sexual assault especially considering if…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 03:40 AM
27

She should lose her job because it's too political to say that you shouldn't generalize a demographic that makes up roughly half the world's population?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 04:03 AM
2

I think it's not a bad concept because it's really just meant to highlight how many people (both men and women) face/have faced some form of sexual harassment in their lifetime. However, I have two concerns over it. My first is that, I've been noticing a portion of my friends who have been sharing the hashtag only mention women as being victims of sexual harassment. There's a noticeable amount of people who include parts about both sexes experiencing sexual harassment though (at least on my feed…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:35 PM
3

I feel like this isn't that uncommon of an issue in marriages when one spouse stays at home with the child. I know my parents had that once or twice when I was younger, and I think your reaction is justified. It's just a matter of discussing the stresses both spouses experience, and trying to figure out what you guys can do to better help each other out. I'm not saying that you need to assign roles in the household like she cleans the kitchen while you're responsible for grocery or anything. How…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:38 PM
1

Absolutely irrelevant to this sub. This is just a picture describing a woman who got concerned over her partner possibly cheating on her over a misunderstanding. Nothing to do with men's rights in any capacity.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 03:48 PM
5

I think that's a reach considering how little information may be available. There are so many factors involved such as the reason for the actual divorce, the other parent's behavior, etc. Sure the man in this situation could have had numerous affairs and arguably doesn't deserve to be in contact with his family, but the mother could also have divorced him for very selfish reasons, and convinced the children from a very young age that the father was to blame for the divorce when that might not be…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:21 AM
4

This has nothing to do with the values of this sub. Posts like this from people like you only add to the hate. We don't need that.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 03:00 PM
2

What part of a high suicide rate (even if relative) is an any way a good thing for any demographic? How can you say that people thinking that they have literally nothing left that is worth living for because they've struggled with their emotions, stress, etc, is a good thing? That just seems like you lack a basic sense of empathy towards others.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:18 AM
2

Well it's not like keeping quiet about it will work either. Some people just don't see it as an issue unless someone explains why it can be considered unfair. If you want them to see it the way you do, just simply stating so is the first step isn't it?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:30 PM
2

I find it interesting how quick some people are to generalize another group of people, but when generalizations are made against their own, it's not ok. I'm not saying that it's specific to any one group though, just seems to be a common occurrence. Regardless, of course there are women who expect the man to pay on date (s). But there's also plenty now that have the means and the will to chip in their own contribution; they might expect the man to pay, but they may also be willing to contribute …
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:36 PM
1

Oh definitely. Honest communication has to be present.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:43 AM
1

That's fair as well as long as the person paying is completely comfortable with the idea. My issue is that the other guy was advocating to just surprise them with splitting the bill. That just seems like such a rude thing to do to a person you have interest in. If you are the type of person who thinks that the bill should be split the first date, just say so. You save time and any potential complication that way.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:33 AM
6

Why not just either agree to split the bill beforehand instead of trying to catch them off guard with it if you're going for a meal? At the very least you'll know where the both of you stand on the idea and it doesn't seem like a trap.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:50 AM
2

Call it what you want man, but you're rather aggressive over things that don't really have much of an impact on your life, and you seem to hate that it's different from what makes you comfortable; it comes across as very hateful. But hey, you do you I guess.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 05:54 AM
4

So you're just a hateful individual. Got it.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:00 PM
-1

Are you implying that being a gay man is somehow not being a "regular" man? I'd like to know what kind of distinction you're trying to make here, if any.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter