TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

congenital_derpes Archive

View 2 posts and 16 comments by congenital_derpes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

“A guy needs somebody―to be near him. A guy goes nuts if he ain't got nobody. Don't make no difference who the guy is, long's he's with you. I tell ya, I tell ya a guy gets too lonely an' he gets sick.”
/r/MensRights21/09/19 01:30 PM
71

This right here is a fucking epidemic in our culture. Nobody understands analogy as a reasoning tool anymore, it's bizarre. I see this everywhere. Basically any hypothetical that is presented is not understood. Look at this example, she didn't merely read the analogy, consider it, and then fail to be swayed by it. She literally did not understand what the man was saying. She didn't comprehend the connection between his analogy and the case in question. There was no connective tissue between them…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:08 PM
1

Thank you, this is great.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 04:21 PM
1

Thanks, awesome.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 04:21 PM
2

Thank you, this is fantastic.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 04:18 PM
2

Please go to the police. It's not about them doing anything right now. It's about them getting it on record incase this happens again. Establish the history officially.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 11:25 AM
2

Did you actually just say that the arts are worthless to society?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:04 AM
1

If this is indeed required by law then that needs to change immediately. If it is simply a policy implemented by individual doctors before they are willing to perform a procedure, then I disagree with it, but the doctor should have every right to do so. Nobody has a right to a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:03 PM
2

I think all is required by any individual (at least at a minimum to make sure you aren't implicitly participating in the problem) is to voice that you disagree with sexist views when they are presented to you. In fact, I think this is a good baseline for any issue. People aren't morally obligated to stand up and give speeches all the time, or to initiate movements behind a given cause (although they are certainly welcome to if they feel the need). But the moral requirement is to express that you…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:06 AM
1

Come study in Canada. Our schools don't do any of this bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:06 PM
0

Whoa. The level to which your comments are consistent with the irrationally defensive, ad hominem, and overly aggressive rhetoric that feminists have become known for, based on assumptions and preconceived hostilities, is very psychologically interesting. I made no comments regarding the validity of the MRA movement, nor did I state that MRAs are inherently inconsistent or misogynistic. The basis for your harsh (and needlessly abusive and defensive) remarks exists solely in your own fabricated i…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:05 AM
-1

So, the violence was completely uncalled for. At the same time, if you don't want to get into an altercation, don't attend a sporting event and be an asshole. Does that justify the altercation? No. Should we set a higher benchmark by avoiding behaviours that lead to such altercations in the first place? Obviously.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:28 AM
0

It depends on what you are referring to as segregation. Should any government agency or service be segregated? Such as schools? No, of course not. But should it be legal for a private individual to make choices regarding their own private property based on race? Yes, I think they should. I passionately disagree with anyone who does that. I would refuse to purchase their service or product, and may even take awareness-spreading action. But I don't believe that that personal disdain that I have fo…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:24 PM
0

To cut right to the point I'll address your first questions. Yes, it is currently illegal to turn away a patron simply because of the persons skin color. It shouldn't be, and we should do away with that bit of legislation. I don't accept your personal understanding of what is "fair" (or anyone's for that matter) as a claim on my life or property. We are disagreeing due to a fundamental difference in our understanding of individual rights.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:50 PM
0

Your presupposing that you have any right to prevent those institutions from existing, simply because you personally dislike their practices. You don't. Scale has absolutely nothing to do with the effectiveness of a Boycott. The same principle applies. The problem you are highlighting isn't of the limitations of Boycotts, it's of the difficulty to persuade people. We must also differentiate between organizational practices that violate individual rights, and those that are simply found distastef…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:24 PM
0

I have no idea whether its legal or not, but it should be. Regardless of whether I approve of the tactic or not, I support the bar owners right to charge whatever he wants to whomever he wants. The public has a powerful, non-legslative, way to influence such practices if they regard them as unacceptable. Don't give them your business.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter