TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

connor1003 Archive

View 0 posts and 128 comments by connor1003 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you had actually read the articles I'm talking about, you'd know that "dual mating strategy" refers to the notion that women look for two primary things in a mate: 1) good genes and 2) provisioning potential. Given that satisfying both needs in one man is a tough challenge for most women, a significant portion of women pursue one man for good genes (sex) and another man for provisioning potential. In other words, AFBB. See Pillsworth & Haselton, Women's Sexual Strategies: The Evolution of Lon…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 09:58 PM
1

If you're really interested in conversing in good faith, look up and read one of the peer-reviewed articles on "dual mating strategy".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 03:17 PM
2

Manquiring*
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 03:03 PM
3

no one cares what you're going to do. it's irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/16 03:42 AM
5

How would one get "burned" by having sex with a hot yet bitchy woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 03:44 PM
1

Yeah the old axiom. "Women enter marriage expecting their men to change, and they don't; men enter marriage expecting their woman not to change and they do."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 11:58 PM
2

Yeah. xxFP's typically care about hurting people's feelings far more than do xxTJ's.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 10:44 PM
2

I think blues are predominantly xxFP and reds are predominantly xxTJ (INTJ reporting in). Almost every xxFP I know thinks it's "marginalizing" and therefore "problematic" or "wrong" to reduce human behavior to exploitable generalizations, especially in the realm of sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 02:11 PM
4

No, plate and FWB are interchangeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/16 01:24 PM
1

Only if the wife displays sexual attraction to the husband - mere beta provider status is typically sexually repulsive to other women. According to the theory, at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 07:21 PM
2

Hypocrisy: judging other people for doing something you do yourself The red pill doesn't care what women do. It's just advice for men that want to optimize their sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 07:43 PM
1

"All guns are loaded"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 07:29 PM
5

This slippery slope fallacy you're displaying is ridiculous. What is so wrong with laveyan satanism? It's an interesting and useful ideology. I for one see obvious parallels between it and TRP. TRP broke the Overton Window a long long time ago, what's the issue? The fact that it's at odds with judeo-Christian philosophy?
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 03:33 PM
1

I would say, for me, 5-10% are not disqualified for marriage based on looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 05:02 AM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 01:30 PM
1

The RP is to treat it as literal if you want to optimize your sexual strategy. Act as if it is literal. Believe as you like. If that makes it "effectively literal" than yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 11:37 PM
1

Jesus Christ I can't believe everyone is still talking about this. No it's not literal. There are exceptions but they are rare enough to be inconsequential.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 11:13 PM
1

INTJ?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 05:33 AM
1

You do that sweetie
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 01:13 PM
1

Good thing you're not
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 01:11 PM
1

They're not "asking" for anything. They don't care what you do. They're theorizing and strategizing so that they may someday get the type of relationship they want. They don't care if you don't want to be submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 01:10 PM
2

There is no "should" in RP. If you think TRP wants you personally to act a certain way then you're misled.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 01:08 PM
1

Blue pill is the belief that generalizations about men and women am cannot be drawn accurately, and that even if they could be, it is pointless/immoral/stupid/(insert pejorative) to try and apply them toward any sort of sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 02:31 PM
1

No humans have voluntarily overridden their biologically ingrained tendencies. Only millions of years of evolving in different conditions can do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 02:12 PM
5

No, the fact that many other women displayed willingness to expend biological resources on him (sex) is an indicator of his high reproductive and genetic fitness. He had to consistently display high survival and reproductive fitness to get so many women to give up their precious biological resources and sleep with him. Because the optimal reproductive strategy for men is polygyny, most men evolved to desire sexual variety and a high N checks that box for them. The same is not true the other way …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:59 PM
1

A troll enthusiast
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 03:34 PM
1

7/10 I've seen better trolling
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:37 PM
1

Why is marriage for those who can "handle" relationships? What is the benefit to marrying instead of lifelong cohabitative LTR?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:32 PM
1

Mind producing those studies? Never seen them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:30 PM
4

It's because compound lifting (squat, bench, deadlift) breaks down so much muscle at once that your body scrambles to convert its cholestrol into testosterone so that it may repair itself. When your body is flooded with twice as much testosterone as before, your whole body, mind, and ultimately life will change. You will be more prone to 'righteous' anger, more decisive, calmer, less anxious, more confident, and ultimately more attractive. Other activities don't break down muscle to the same deg…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 01:47 PM
1

You're still straw manning...only anger phasers think women are inferior. The core of RP theory simply paints women as different from men with competing biological imperatives. It highlights the true humanity of women and men. Blue pullers are the ones ignoring the humanity of women. Relationships are the game of relating to the opposite sex romantically and sexually. If you don't see how it is a game to be played, sucks - you'll never feel the sexual and romantic agency of a self actualized RP-…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 01:43 PM
1

1) you are straw manning. I believe in RP theory and do not think women are subhuman. 2) I am not having trouble relating to women anymore thanks to TRP. It highlighted the real game so that I could play it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 01:26 PM
2

Wow. What a non-answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 12:53 PM
2

Strong social conditioning
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 12:51 PM
1

1) I don't think women are subhuman 2) that doesn't make sense, one can think women are subhuman without blaming them for anything. even if I did think women were subhuman I wouldn't be blaming them for my problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 12:42 PM
1

Ephebophiliac polygynous. This is also not pejorative.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 12:40 PM
1

Hypergamous with a dual mating strategy. This is not pejorative.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 04:38 AM
1

Trp got me a couple happy relationships. I'm stoked on life. Love women. Any personal or relationship failings are my fault and mine alone. You gonna tell me I don't actually believe in the ideology?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 04:37 AM
2

Every one of the definitions of sexism in this thread is wrong so far. The correct definition is "factually unsupported discrimination based on sex". None of those statements fit that label and thus they aren't sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:23 AM
2

What do you mean by "valid"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:21 AM
1

It's only tenuously related to a woman's ability to produce healthy offspring so it has a negligible impact on her sexual attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 02:54 AM
2

No, it just becomes a different "wave" a la second-wave v original feminism. Third wave feminists are not representative of second-wave feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 06:54 PM
5

It does not matter how big the group is, they are simply not representative of the idea because they are wrong about the idea. It is unfortunate, but an undeniable reality that the majority of people contributing to what was originally a useful conversation are simply derailing it and defecating everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 04:31 PM
2

I agree. Which is why I think it is important for everyone to keep a keen eye focused on theory versus practice, and not to toss aside what may be a useful and pragmatic theory because it has been diluted and bastardized in practice. Socialism/communism is a perfect example of (in my opinion) an amazing theory that simply has not been realized fully in practice and may never be.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 04:29 PM
4

Thanks. I see this same misconception EVERYWHERE in PPD and it seems to be what causes 85% of the rustled jimmies.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 03:00 PM
10

Whoever does those things is an idiot and is not representative of RP ideology. The only thing RP is concerned about is helping men apply their individual sexual strategy through describing the SMP. If there are exceptions to the general RP principles (and there are, it's designed to fit most and not all women - awalt is a heuristic) and a woman doesn't exhibit dual mating strategy as prominently or prefers to be dominant, no red piller who isn't an idiot would care about that. He would simply s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 02:32 PM
2

Dual mating strategy in women. They're open to dating short guys because short guys may still be able to fulfill their provisioning and comfort needs (BB). What these women don't realize is that they seek one set of traits for dating purposes and another set for sex purposes, and they end up conflating the two desires in themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 02:09 PM
0

TRP doesn't prescribe anything for "society" at all. It's just about what men tend to like in relationships. If you don't want to be submissive to a man then don't. No red piller cares if you don't want to play that role.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 07:46 AM
4

I have never seen anyone straw man the red pill as hard as I've seen you do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 05:26 AM
4

You are fooling yourself if you think this is analogous to the red pill. No one is calling for womanicide and anyone who did would be downvoted into oblivion
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 05:23 AM
11

It's not the fact that they play video games and talk about quantum mechanics that makes them unattractive. It's the fact that they sit in their mom's basement surrounded by empty bags of Cheetos browsing 4chan.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 05:19 AM
1

Glad to see that the true GayLubeOil persona is more magnanimous than initially projected.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/16 02:52 PM
2

Commitment is what women want. A high volume of sex is what men want. Marriage 1.0 was a compromise. Marriage 2.0 is unilaterally fulfilling women's biological imperative while neglecting men's.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 02:40 PM
0

Why are 'bang' 'nail' and 'fuck' offensive? They seem pretty neutral to me. Slut is arguable. Last two are pejorative. Offense at the other four is more a reflection of the person taking offense than the person saying the words
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 01:31 AM
1

I don't see why a guy who says "I like to bang sluts once in a while" necessarily has a low opinion of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 12:12 AM
2

It's just a generalization and not an absolute rule. Generally marriage is not in the best interest of men but of course there will be variation based on individual preferences. RP merely seeks to provide information with which people can make informed decisions according to their personal goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 11:00 PM
1

Talk to people. If what you're saying is uninteresting but people still listen to you, your SMV is high.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 10:50 PM
6

A RP man in a successful marriage wouldn't reject the notion that "don't get married" is good entry level red pill advice. Once a man is well-versed in RP principles, though, he may be able to pull off a marriage that actually ends up being in his best interest instead of getting deadbedroomed and divorce raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 10:48 PM
9

"Sexual success" varies based on the individual. The point of the red pill since its inception has been to give accurate advice to males so they may implement their own individualized strategy most efficiently. Some men may simply decide that monogamy or marriage is how they would like to live their life and RP has no qualms with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 10:32 PM
2

You're making a big deal out of nothing. It's chill. That's the solution to anger phase
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 10:15 PM
1

Climate change is actually the more scientifically accurate term though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 03:28 PM
2

Red Pillers believe that gender/sex is biologically - not socially - constructed, and that there are generalizations one can make about men and women that are both factually true and useful in implementing an optimal sexual strategy. They base these generalizations on evolutionary psychology. For example, "women evolved to be socially manipulative because it gave them the best chance of surviving and reproducing in a harsh natural environment." Thus, if you are unaware of these generalizations o…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 05:43 AM
4

Yup. Because those women have high SMV (looks/tits/ass) and low RMV (unreliable, histrionic, dumb, promiscuous, etc.) Just like a man can have high SMV (social status, muscles, promiscuity) but low RMV (promiscuity).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 09:48 PM
3

Women do outwardly disapprove of male promiscuity because of the reasons you mention. However, there is a competing biological interest in gender relations for women - the need to secure the best genes for her offspring. One of the best 'tells' for great genes is high promiscuity, as it shows other women have judged him worthy of biological resource expenditure and therefore he must have good genes. This is why RPers say something like "watch what women do, not what they say": women will outward…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 07:33 PM
1

It can be tough to tell. A big problem is that a large percentage of RPers are really stupid and mess up the message.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:48 PM
2

I would say you are straw manning, but it is an understandable straw man considering RPers tend to use hyperbolic language just to be un-PC and offensive on principle and to make their points stronger. Unfortunately their conversational habits confuse some of the noobs, who actually leave TRP believing that the message is "the key to getting women is viewing and treating them like objectively inferior beings."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:13 PM
1

Why would someone decide that "because the bible says so" is a sufficient reason for making distinctions between right and wrong? Other than their 'feelings' or 'opinion'. And what makes "because the bible says so" "worse" than any other reason for distinguishing between right and wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:06 PM
3

You're misstating RP theory. It is not at all necessary for an RP man to think his wife is a dumb cunt. An RP man can have nothing but the utmost respect and reverence for his wife, it's just that he believes evopsych is valid and each gender has a natural "role" in a relationship, from which deviation is likely to cause emotional harm and an unsuccessful relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:41 PM
4

You forget that the evolutionary sexual strategies of men in general conflict with that of women (I.e. Men want to fornicate with as many young nubile women as possible and women want commitment from the best male possible) RP theory dictates that men in general prefer ephebophiliac polygyny and women prefer hypergamy. These two strategies are incompatible and if one party gets what they want, the other necessarily doesn't. It's not just about pairing off and having a kid - it's about each party…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:39 PM
1

I don't see "one must give reasons for distinguishing between right and wrong" in the definition of morality. Nor was I aware that distinctions always require reasons. People usually make distinctions between right and wrong based on an arbitrary emotional impulse, and their "reasons" for defining right wrong are completely arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:29 PM
1

You're misstating the definition. The morals themselves are "principles" for distinguishing between right and wrong. There is no mention of any "reason" requirement for those principles under the definition. Also, why must a moral principle necessarily be "defended" simply because it affects the world outside one's head? Do any courses of action that entail interaction with the world require justification? If so, I can't fathom why that would be the case. Seems like a random axiom pulled out of …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 07:34 AM
1

Why's that? Not sure where you're getting that idea. Most people's moral principles are derived from actions that benefit the collective rather than the individual, and they act like this is "rational" but in reality it's a completely arbitrary choice. There is no objectively compelling reason to choose an altruistic set of morals over an egoistic one. Just like there's no objectively compelling reason to choose one flavor of ice cream.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 01:39 PM
1

And why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 03:04 AM
1

Yeah but you're debating about morals which is like trying to convince someone to switch to a new preference in ice cream flavors
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 02:48 PM
1

This is incorrect, their views are compatible. The difference is that RPW is a place to discuss optimal female sexual strategy in today's world and TRP is the place to discuss optimal male sexual strategy in today's world. Men and women are different so their strategies are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 02:16 PM
1

I feel like I had this a year ago, at age 23. I am a naturally futuristic thinker (INTJ) so I plan pretty far ahead in my own life. There came a moment when I was fixated on where my life would lead, and all I could see was a bunch of meaningless, arbitrary, and unsatisfying sensory experiences culminating in a death. Achievements didn't matter, gathering experiences didn't matter , nothing mattered when taken in the context of the great gaping maw of entropy and death enveloping our realm. Just…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 03:11 PM
1

I make sure my legs are spread as wide as possible on buses in order to breathe into my balls and oppress women
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 03:44 PM
1

That's incorrect. Fix your misunderstanding before attempting to contribute to the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 10:02 PM
2

Lots of past sexless LTR's.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 03:27 PM
1

This is so true. The more time you spend consciously attempting to unravel your own indoctrination and think HARD about why you feel you do, the more self-aware and attuned one becomes. The emotions themselves start to become malleable once you realize how truly arbitrary they are. Pretty soon you're getting pleasurable dopamine rushes from things you wouldn't have thought possible in the past, due to your mental and emotional hangups that were fucking your life. Deadlifting 400 pounds is exciti…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 12:54 AM
2

And men don't force them on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 12:45 AM
2

Poor posture can be caused by a number of things unrelated to weak muscles. Chronic injury, myofascial trigger points, shortened muscles from years of bad posture, anything. You're oversimplifying the problem and as a result, giving advice that is likely to cause harm to people. Stop.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 05:35 AM
1

No, doctors are not a good place to start. Their job is to give advice that is likely to help the general public - I.e. People with terrible thoracic kyphosis or lordosis or some other structural inefficiency who should not be doing any "basic lifting program" lest they irreversibly fuck up their shoulders/back. That's why GP's tell people not to lift. Your advice is dangerous and will hurt someone who hasn't already corrected their postural problems and inflexibilities.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 04:56 AM
1

Fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 06:13 AM
1

It's true that it's marketed toward individuals who don't need it, and it's true that supraphysiological levels of testosterone are correlated with cardiac events, but to say it "does nothing" is untrue. Turning a reading of 200 ng/DL of testosterone into an 800 ng/DL one through testosterone injection is likely to have nothing but positive effects on one's life assuming diet and exercise are in check.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 01:31 AM
1

As a male who has experienced what low testosterone feels like and remedied it through intramuscular testosterone injection,your comment is so egregiously false it's hilarious you'd even try to say something like that with a straight face.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 10:40 PM
1

Valueless TO THEM in the context of a relationship because they personally are looking for a pretty woman to fuck. Not valueless objectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 09:16 AM
1

You are falsely equating relationship value to men with worth as a human being...in nearly every one of your comments in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 10:56 PM
4

All actions are ultimately self interested - even ones that arise from "ethical principles" which are really just tools to help develop a pragmatic social persona.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 03:59 PM
3

Level 2. I believe that to be the actual highest point of moral development.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 03:41 PM
3

He doesn't have a problem with a result of 50/50 split across genders as long as the candidates are selected based on qualification. What he does have a problem with, however, is declaring a selection process invalid if it doesn't yield a result of 50/50 men/women. I don't see what's so hard to understand about this. If the best candidates are selected, and the result is 14 women and two men, that's fine. If the result Is 16 men and 0 women, fine. What's not fine is yielding a result of 12 women…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 11:02 PM
5

That's not his automatic viewpoint - read his comment again. He is simply saying he wants to select based on qualification and not by sex. He'd be fine if the top twelve were six men and six women as long as they were the top 12 in qualification.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:33 PM
1

I'm 6' 2" and good looking. Women do not approach me because women typically do not approach men in general and that's just the system in place for relationships these days. You can either practice approaching and eventually (after years of practice) get a few of the women you actually want, or whine about how women won't approach you and die an incel virgin. Your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 06:05 PM
1

Assuming arguendo that there exists a patriarchy, men control society. If men control society, they are responsible for societal phenomena. Therefore, if feminism arises in a patriarchy, men are responsible for feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 04:47 PM
1

These traits evolved over millions of years - a healthy body and a good hip-waist ratio (i.e. Being hot) have historically been the traits that led women to the greatest survival and reproductive success possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 03:10 PM
1

It is the mere fact that the men are in the top 4% that makes them attractive, not the fact that only the top 4% are sufficiently attractive for women. If those top 4% reproduced en masse, women would still only prefer the apex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 07:20 PM
1

No. This is an incredibly myopic thing to say. The fact that men and women are behaviorally, hormonally, physically, mentally different is well supported by the scientific literature. TRP reasons from this to "men and women are different and have different optimal reproductive strategies and different criteria for evolutionary success". Then from that, they reason to "different standards should be applied to men and women in evaluating their survival and reproductive fitness." Which makes sense.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 09:12 PM
1

If the post is made by a contributor who knows what he is talking about, then no, the post doesn't imply a moral judgment regarding women who cheat. Any moralizing about it is irrelevant to TRP discourse and should be censored, just like moralizing about male cheating should be censored for irrelevance. Plenty of the posters on TRP express strong moral sentiments against cheating, both on the part of men and women. All of them are talking about things irrelevant to TRP, which is a forum devoted …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:36 AM
2

The answer is that TRP censors posts that are irrelevant to the discussion. TRP is about the "can" be done, not the "should" be done. Incendiary posts about the "inferiority of women", while stupid, address topics crucial to the formation of effective sexual strategy. One would need to know whether women are inferior beings or not in determining the best way to seduce them. Incendiary posts are therefore relevant to the discourse and should not be censored. On the other hand, conversations about…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 03:16 AM
2

Actually, reasoning by analogy is considered the strongest method of argument (I'm in law school) as long as the analogy is on point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 03:21 PM
2

RP would agree with this. A key that can't open many locks is a shitty key. I.e. A man who can't get laid has demonstrated evolutionary failure in the sexual marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 03:20 PM
1

I getcha. On a tangentially related note, sometimes I think this sub disparages women too hard for emotional thinking - i think an emotional attunement is crucial for living a fulfilled life. Definitely should be kept the hell out of politics though. Can't feel your way through societal ills.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 01:50 PM
1

Not really. If you're a fat, lazy basement dwelling fuck, the only thing you need to do to turn into someone who consistently eats right, works out hard, and looks great is consistently eat right and work out hard. Which is exactly what TRP will tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 02:52 AM
11

You can't honestly believe that all women are liberal and all men are conservative.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 12:46 AM
3

What if they sincerely want to change their lifestyle so they can reap the social benefits of being fitter?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 12:11 AM
1

I don't see how it's "pretending" if the person openly admits to being motivated by social validation in pursuit of fitness.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 12:10 AM
3

Okay, so let's say a man is socially ostracized because of his morbid obesity. Is he not genuine if this motivates him to become fit?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 08:04 PM
1

Why? What's wrong with someone desiring fitness for the social benefits? Most things people do are for the purpose of achieving some end. Is a property manager not "genuine" because he manages properties for the purpose of making money and not because he enjoys managing properties?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 08:03 PM
1

So making a lifestyle change for the purpose of getting fitter is pointless? You make no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 07:28 PM
3

What? That's silly. Of course someone can have a change of heart and become more ambitious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 07:27 PM
1

Would it better serve her self-interest to behave in another manner?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 10:48 PM
1

That is exactly his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 02:15 PM
2

Is this a joke? Pity is the correct spelling.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 02:36 PM
1

The degree to which you are missing the point of this thread is astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 01:56 PM
1

This is the best-executed troll account I have ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 04:47 PM
0

Why not just try gambling using your life savings? A bunch of people keep saying stupid shit like "you'll ruin your future" and "gambling is a bad deal" but why would I just run away from the opportunity staring me in the face? Don't you all want to man up, do it right, and triple your life savings instead??
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 06:57 PM
1

Fine by me. I'll just get jacked and tan, learn game and raise my SMV manually.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:39 PM
3

I used to say that the definition of sexism is "discrimination based on sex" but then I realized that this would encompass any distinction made between sexes. A supermarket selling tampons in a "women's" section but not a men's is discrimination based on sex and would thus be sexist under this definition. I think a more workable definition of sexism would be "factually unjustified sexual discrimination", e.g. discrimination based on sex without any factual basis for doing so. Under this definiti…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/15 03:06 AM
3

Well, given that "to be moral" means "to do what one should do," the question of "why be moral" is nonsensical. You're really asking whether one should adhere to deontologist (engage in morally sound actions because they're morally sound) ethics as opposed to consequentialist ethics (act in ways that bring about the best consequences).
/r/AlreadyRed06/02/15 02:30 PM
1

Even still, the fact that about half of US citizens are below the world average doesn't really reflect much stupidity on the part of US citizens.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 10:39 PM
6

Well... That would be true no matter how smart/stupid people are. 100 is, by definition, the average score.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 04:11 PM
1

Necrophagist certainly gives me tingles, though. Gotta love The Stillborn One.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 03:10 PM
0

I'm not an expert, but TRP uses arguments based on evolutionary psychology to account for this double-standard. Promiscuity among men increases men's reproductive potential, while promiscuity among women diminishes women's reproductive potential. The argument is that humans have evolved in ways that make them favor behaviors that increase survival and reproductive capacity, which is why promiscuous men are seen as attractive and promiscuous women are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 01:24 PM
1

If he's the second greatest, who's the greatest? Hegel?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 02:21 PM
1

Racetams are cool, just remember to wean yourself off the cycle rather than quit cold turkey once you stop. Made that mistake once, never again.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 04:52 AM
2

right there with you on the yoga - have you heard of Ashtanga Primary Series? Most RP style of yoga ever. No room for deluding yourself regarding your own physical capability.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 02:28 PM
1

This seems absurd, is this sarcasm?
/r/seduction15/10/12 04:09 AM
2

INTJ here. Woop woop.
/r/seduction12/04/11 02:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter