TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

continuousQ Archive

View 1 post and 90 comments by continuousQ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

It's not new, it's ancient. People are not born identical, born into predetermined roles in society. Yes, there are statistical differences between the genders. And there are still plenty of individuals who don't fit in with the norm.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 09:45 AM
1

Language, math, critical thinking skills. Either you group everyone, or you're going to be putting some people in a less suitable group by making changes for people only based on their gender.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 02:53 AM
2

People are different. If we're going to separate people based on what suits them better, it should be based on individual traits.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 05:35 PM
1

Sort of, because he was out of office almost immediately, there wasn't a lot of back and forth.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:19 AM
2

Ultimately I'd like to see the advertising industry done away with. Because they're always going to be dishonest, and looking for new ways to manipulate people into doing something they wouldn't do otherwise. With ever increasing amounts of personal information being collected, and with AI tech looming, I'm not expecting ad content/behavior to get any better over time.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:33 PM
2

Depends on how much you like food.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/17 05:13 PM
3

Always spay or neuter.
/r/MGTOW13/02/17 07:16 AM
1

Seems more like an inventory/stacking issue, than anything else.
/r/MGTOW28/10/16 09:01 AM
3

How are the nearby washrooms labeled?
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:54 PM
0

Yeah, this goes beyond gender issues (though not to defend people at the same place and position working different amounts for the same compensation. Instead that's probably something that contributes to worse motivation for those observing that). We seem to value people staying at work more than we do the actual work and results. With long hours people have to take breaks throughout the day to be able to keep somewhat the same level of pace, but even with that it's unlikely you'll be able to ke…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 06:31 AM
1

I think abortion is a good thing, and that we'd be worse off not having that option. Having a need for abortion in the first place, that's what's bad.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:13 PM
5

Not so sure about that one. Women are "pro-life" too. Otherwise, they are the slight majority of voters, and if all women were for the right to choose, they would have it. A lot of things would be different if men gave birth. Especially if that meant humans were like seahorses. But this is not just about people voting against the rights of people in another category from themselves. Or, biology might not be at all as big of a factor as wealth or religion.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:11 PM
3

some people are bad people and need to be locked away from the rest of society. This is what happens in Norway, too. And sure, reducing crime rates and recidivism is about more than their treatment in prison. You have to have some quality of life outside of prison, social safety nets, a high standard of public education, job opportunities. But if the general attitude towards prison is that people should expect to be raped and be laughed at for it, you've given up on rehabilitation from the start…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:31 PM
5

Not necessarily struggling more. But what there is now is lots of cheap modern technology to keep the average person entertained, while the rich get ever more power and control.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:14 PM
1

So is there also a needle exchange program for men, or is this it? Not sure why you'd need start out with sex discrimination here. I could see maybe some specific cases of PTSD leading to persons not being able to be around persons of a certain gender, but that only means you need to figure out how to accommodate them, not how to exclude anyone else.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:48 PM
1

I notice winter sport athletes tend to hook up with each other. But maybe that's because those sports are more alike for men and women, in particular for being held at the same times and places, so they hang around each other more. Their training schedule (and locations) through the year might be quite similar, too.
/r/MGTOW17/03/16 03:47 PM
4

If there's an abortion in month 8, that's most likely a severe medical event, and something that should've been covered by universal healthcare regardless. Not that it isn't worth it for the tax payers to pay for abortions rather than what may be an entire childhood in poverty, otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:17 AM
1

Which it doesn't necessarily do, either. It costs money to force someone to do something they don't want to do. And sometimes can't do.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:12 AM
1

Yes, it's about making sure the child is taken care of. But that can be accomplished through government benefits just as easily as saying that one specific person has to be responsible because they happened to have had one particular instance of sex.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:07 AM
3

I think the prison sentence should be extended as far as necessary. Once they're out they're out. The crime of rape should be punished like the crime it is, which may include paying monetary compensation to the victim of the crime. But making them pay child support is to treat them as any other parent, and that's not what they are.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:03 AM
1

There are effective ways to do that, there is no excuse to have an "accidental" or unwanted child. There are several. Including organizations and politicians purposefully ensuring that kids are not taught about the most effective ways of preventing pregnancy, and even instead are subject to claims like condoms increasing the risk of STIs. Sex education is highly insufficient in many schools in the US, and healthcare clinics that help people get access to contraceptives are being systematically r…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:20 PM
1

My take on it is that we as a society have a responsibility for those who are members of it, which is why we come together to pay for infrastructure, police, healthcare, education, etc. And we should be looking for the best policies and practices, including how to best raise and protect children. I think giving government benefits to those with limited resources who want to raise children, is preferable to forcing unwilling persons to be parents. And they might not always have the resources anyw…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:17 PM
2

I don't think this would open up for any worse fraud than what's already going on. Instead it might make for less paternal fraud, as it's no longer enough to trick someone into thinking that they're the father, or have the state declare that someone is the father without requiring genetic proof. And aside of fraud, it could make for less of having babies to trap someone, when they can't be trapped that way. Which is good for children as much as anyone else, they shouldn't be a means to control s…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:00 PM
2

In short this argument rests on two facts that have rapidly changed over the past 50 years. 1) That the medical risks of any form of childbirth are greater than legal medical abortions; Not sure that has changed much in relative terms. Childbirth is more dangerous than abortion today, but was that ever the other way around? Childbirth without modern medicine or modern hygiene is very dangerous.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 03:22 AM
3

Or the abortion could be covered by universal healthcare. Which is the case in Sweden, for the most part.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 03:11 AM
3

By this definition a brain-dead human has no rights. Why would they? If their brain is dead, they are no more. The only thing that's left is honoring their wishes, as they declared them before their passing. Someone who has never had a functioning brain will have made no wishes.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 03:03 AM
8

assuming there is absolutely no unusual health concerns for the mother. Unusual is an unfair qualifier here. Pregnancy is a significant health risk, no unusual circumstances required. And anyone who wants a child, and qualifies to be a parent, can adopt. Or they can find someone who wants to reproduce with them. Some people have children with many different partners. Depending on how important it is for someone to replicate ~50% of their genes, there should be plenty of options around. Including…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 02:31 AM
1

Sex is a social tool more than it is anything else. People have sex all the time. Even without contraceptives, humans have sex far more times than they have number of children. And people also want to have sex far more than they want to have children. Usually they'll want children much later in life than they start wanting sex (some never want them), and pregnancy is a risk they fear.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 02:28 AM
0

We also found a nurse who was under intense pressure by her husband to have her newborn son circumcised, and she was willing to have her son to be the subject of the study. This "study" sounds quite unethical. At the very least I'd expect this to involve someone whose parents was going to have surgery performed on them anyway, not a parent opposed to it but then sacrificing their child.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 11:07 AM
2

It's unfortunate she wasn't charged and sentenced. With time served she'd have a much better case coming back out into society. The death threats aren't appropriate, but she has shown herself to be a dangerous individual, and someone for people to be wary of.
/r/MGTOW07/02/16 09:50 PM
2

A blog post, a graded assignment dutifully submitted? I would've thought this would've at least been about someone yelling at the professor in person.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:59 AM
2

But men alone are to blame for the war on reproductive freedom.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:53 AM
2

Women get more help? The TL;DR of /u/snarky-'s comment.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:47 PM
1

They want the drama of having it fixed. So we give them that. It might also be because of the need/desire/demand to release ASAP rather than perfect.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:38 PM
1

Wrongful imprisonment compensations really need to be increased across the board. There should be a high federal minimum that places a significant cost on the systems that wrongfully imprison someone. Instead of the maximum compensations some states have. And maybe there needs to be a law concerning judges promoting themselves based on conviction rate.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:31 PM
1

If there is systematic discrimination and misogyny in society, it's not about boys. They're not the ones who create and run the system. The very best you can hope to achieve with a pledge like this is to distract people from the real causes and the individuals with real responsibility. This general attitude is what made me wary of feminism from the start. When you're a kid growing up, and someone indicates that you are responsible for the wrongs in society, just because of your gender (or pretty…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:12 PM
3

Seems like they're showing why there needs to be a men's rights group at that university.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:46 PM
1

Civil suit.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:56 PM
6

I didn't even notice I was in /r/MensRights until your comment. Definitely a tragic story and something to make you question the justice system. Didn't see the MRA aspect.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:53 PM
2

All depends on your circumstances. Merely to have a relationship, you should be equally fine with or without the formality of marriage. And if you want to have a party, you can have that without getting legally married. But if you meet and love someone from another continent, or another country and you don't both live in the Schengen Area, or countries with similar treaties, then it may be required for you to become able to share a home.
/r/MGTOW22/10/15 10:22 AM
0

And Eddison's most famous invention wasn't really something he invented. I think our problem is we don't care to know the full process behind something. Having one name and pinning everything on that is good enough.
/r/MGTOW22/10/15 10:12 AM
15

Yeah, might be better to make your own drawings for this, or at least stick a huge disclaimer on it explaining this is an altered comic and linking the original.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 12:47 PM
1

Why no porn? To instigate homosexual experimentation?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 09:10 PM
30

He said the word of the week, chivalry, is part of the monthlong theme in September of “respect,” and as part of this week’s lesson, boys are “strongly encouraged” to remain standing at lunch until all of the girls at the table are seated. So they're training the boys to be servants. Nothing to do with respect. Just happen to have the wrong genitalia, so you get to be inferior. And they're probably prepared to bully anyone who distinguishes themselves from the group by not participating in what'…
/r/MGTOW03/10/15 10:11 PM
1

A key part of vaccination is to have as many as possible potential carriers vaccinated, to stop the spread, and not just stop an individual from getting it. An individual who may not always get protection from their vaccination, and rely on herd immunity instead. If HPV doesn't spread between and affect human females exclusively, why would this policy arise? Reading the article it almost sounds like an anti-gay male policy. "We've vaccinated this group of people for you to have sex with. Not tha…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:17 AM
2

I hope she's at least blatantly opposed to marriage. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2733365/Stick-marriage-says-Helen-Mirren-Actress-says-couples-quick-it.html Oh.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:48 PM
8

This all started when Marotta donated his sperm to the lesbian couple in 2009 after seeing their post on craigslist. Seems they just went the wrong way about it. But you'd think there would be some legal route that's still open to them, if he wants to sign away his parental rights and the second woman wants to take on parental rights and responsibility.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:18 PM
2

Where's the link to the study?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:29 PM
2

We need more focus on them as regular people for the sake of giving them the treatment they deserve, and less idolizing for the sake of recruitment and warmongering.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:08 PM
10

IMO sperm donation shows why simply having a direct genetic descendant shouldn't entail any legal responsibility. It should be about intention, or possibly extend that to some level of significant negligence. But having sex is just having sex (while this isn't even that), not committing to parenthood. It shouldn't bind a man anymore than it binds a woman (who of course should have the legal right to terminate any pregnancy). It should be up to people whether they want to be legally responsible f…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 02:47 PM
1

My impression has been that school uniforms and dresscodes are primarily about authoritarianism and teaching obedience. You can't wear that. Why? Because those are the rules.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 09:00 AM
3

I wondered why so many subs came back so soon. I could've missed the whole thing if I didn't check reddit briefly this morning, save for the posts saying "earlier today some people couldn't use this subreddit".
/r/MensRights03/07/15 09:39 PM
2

Those are the two core options. Legal marriage for all or legal marriage for none. I think this decision should be seen as a boon to all sides, because this settles one of the major debates about marriage and allows more attention to be paid to other aspects of it. Or maybe even allows less attention to be paid to marriage overall, for those who think it should just be ignored.
/r/MGTOW27/06/15 09:20 AM
6

Well, this is equality of the very rich. Difficult to make sense of in any case. For the part of the money that was concerning the children, shouldn't that money at least go to the children, or to a fund managed by a government appointee (who obviously should have others overseeing them to ensure proper management) in place of parents capable of parenting together?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:07 PM
1

The thing is that terrorism is a minor issue in Western countries. So a lot of things should be taken much more seriously or have a lot more resources devoted towards dealing with them. And why compare an actual act of something, to threats of something? The main problem here is that terrorism is severely hyped up, and that it's used as an excuse by authorities and politicians to get away with abusing public funds and violating the people they are supposed to represent and work purely in the int…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:41 AM
2

They probably only blurred the article image after the link to it was submitted here.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:28 AM
1

It's actually just a sign that says "no entry" in a very convoluted way.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 10:11 PM
4

Right, it should make more sense to make paternal leave universal and equal to maternal leave (maybe excluding however much time is needed for strictly medical reasons, for birth givers specifically), so women aren't the only ones expected to be home with newborns. Of course the US still needs to make maternity leave universal. But make parental leave as gender neutral as possible.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:34 PM
2

Like most couples creating embryos, we signed a legal-binding contract giving us equal rights to the embryos; it also stipulated that, if either party wanted to use the embryos, both parties would need to agree. I always thought of this concept in terms of freezing eggs and sperm separately, something people could do for their own sake, preserving their own genetic material in case they needed/wanted it for later. And in light of stories like this one, freezing embryos seems like a significant l…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 05:20 PM
3

There was just recently a story with reversed sexes. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/30/opinion/sofiavergaras-ex-fiance-our-frozen-embryos-have-a-right-to-live.html Most of the responses to that from what I gathered were basically "Tough.". Edit: And that one is actually linked to from this article, I see now.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 04:28 PM
40

It makes sense on some level, if you have one person working and one staying at home, that you can evaluate how much the one staying at home is contributing towards allowing the person working to be able to do the work that they do. Which could vary from nothing up to whatever team of people you'd have to hire to get the same result. But there has to be a ceiling on how much the value of providing for someone at home can possibly add up to. Edit: And apparently she already got half of everything…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:01 PM
9

What about men who are more comfortable around women than they are men, and vice versa? I don't think it can be fair unless it's up to each individual to decide where to go (which would be the environment most suited to their particular preferences), rather than having it decided for them because of their gender.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:07 PM
5

How about; be nice to others, and they might find it worthwhile to be nice too?
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:22 PM
7

If you kept them from printing more, that wouldn't be okay. But if they made a good chunk of money selling books the first time around, maybe then they'd just release it on ebook for free if they wanted to make sure it was known to the world.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:58 PM
47

Right. You buy a copy of a book, that's basically yours to do with what you want. Same with flags. It might be a waste of material to destroy it as a part of speech and expression, but it's not going to register compared to the waste already built into our societies in transport and replacing slightly out of date furniture and clothing, and throwing away otherwise perfectly healthy food. And massively overwatering crops.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:44 PM
73

I would say burning a book is fine, as long as it's your book, and you're not creating a fire hazard or spreading smoke in a confined area. Vandalizing and damaging other people's property, and physically assaulting other people, is not fine.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:12 PM
15

The way to preserve the peace would be to make paternity tests routine and something everyone does, so no one has to make a fuss over asking for it, and nobody gives it a second thought, except in the hopefully rare cases where there's a mismatch.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:50 PM
5

Not at all. With surrogacy it's the same deal as with regular pregnancy, and you might as well ask a random woman if they want to incubate a child and hand it over to you. The only difference is the genetic relationships.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:45 AM
4

Been waiting for this for a while. I can't imagine why anyone would want to undergo a pregnancy, if they didn't have to. Well, okay, some people might want to go that natural route (and then probably get drugged up anyway). But for most people, if they want a kid, if they want it to be of their genetic material, and they can avoid all the traditional personal health risks and bodily burdens, it seems an obvious choice. And anyone anywhere arguing for banning abortions, should be relegated to adv…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:40 AM
1

I think Bill Maher's main problem, is that he lacks critical thinking skills, and only goes as far as to form an opinion on something, and then that's going to be his opinion from there on. He's been anti-medical science for a while. If he doesn't initially understand it, to him it could just as well be made up. From vaccines to restless leg syndrome.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 08:39 PM
1

Or just a sad state of affairs. I don't see the point to subreddits that don't allow for disagreement. Might as well have a blog without comments enabled.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:37 PM
4

You could say that about pretty much anything, though. Just exercise the muscles you want to grow, eat what they need to grow, easy.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:00 PM
0

Fair point. Formally, more could be done to clarify the meaning or lack of meaning of the name upfront, if not changing the name. But I think the inclusivity of their rule #1 still outweighs what can be derived from the name, and they have dealt with it in the FAQ.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:28 AM
1

It does bring them to the front page for those who have yet to login, and that can still be a significant share of all who browse reddit.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 08:27 AM
1

I honestly don't think that's true. I regularly see people comment on how they wish their name didn't specify the number of X chromsomes. There might be some transphobes, as in any community, but I've seen more welcoming responses than I have hostile ones.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 08:24 AM
1

Kvinner og menn har samme rettigheter og plikter. Statens myndigheter skal legge forholdene til rette for at særlig kvinner kan utøve sine rettigheter. The fuck? And why again are transpersons left out? We need to eliminate gender as any sort of qualifier, if our honest goal is true equality. Instead this seems like misdirection. At the very most, something like this could be implemented as a timelimited temporary measure, in an area where there was a complete lack of women's rights, for example…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:04 PM
11

What if you're a man who generally feels more comfortable around women than around men, and vice versa? This is what is wrong with gender based discrimination, being of one gender doesn't mean you have to be one certain way as an individual.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:03 AM
8

But, if the potential mother knows there isn't a father ahead of time, she could decide not to have a child. Of course we tend to solve the biological inequality with law, and force the sperm dispenser to be financially or personally involved, as a way to ensure care. We could consider what alternatives there might be, if our main concern is that children are taken care of. Roping in the one person who happened to have been involved in one single instance of sex that led to fertilization, doesn'…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:34 PM
1

No, it doesn't. It applies in either case. Whether you see the fetus as an independent entity, or as only a part of the body its within. If it's only a part of that body, obviously there is no way there could be an issue. But if it's its own independent entity, then there are two bodies, and the fetus is within another body. If everyone has the right to control what goes on within their own bodies, then the fetus has to have permission to remain within someone else's body.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:21 PM
1

If a man were pregnant, he should have the right to an abortion, as in he should have the right to control what happens with his body. The issue with forced parenthood for men is a little different. Personally I think that in an ideal world there should be no such thing, for anyone who hasn't previously actively, consciously committed to it. But with the state of bodily rights in large parts of the USA and many other countries, that might be unreasonable to have as a primary focus, for what chan…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:30 AM
2

But they'll still have to wait in line for the baby changers and disabled persons. And, it's not always just peeing. If anyone can use either bathroom, there's a greater likelyhood that one will be available. I wouldn't necessarily look at this from a sexism perspective, it's more about efficiency.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:18 AM
2

It'd probably be a better movie if they just hired a mob guy to kill him.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:54 PM
3

I don't think it's necessarily different for women being abused vs. men. In the long run it's not about who can take who. If they're physically being oppressed, most victims would be able to contact the police as soon as they were by themselves. But their circumstances might make them unable or unwilling to see that as a solution. Maybe they hope they'll be able to fix things eventually, and it'll all be right again. Or maybe they've convinced themselves that that's just how it has to be, and th…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:28 PM
3

I'm not a regular here, but I am concerned that there are some people who think that males never suffer gender based discrimination, and that based on that presupposition they are lead to ignore or deny it when it does happen. Others again seem to think that because there are people who care about discrimination against males, it means they deny that gender based discrimination against females happens. My position is that of course neither should happen, and that we need to be aware of what is g…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 08:08 PM
1

Yes, they fall in love. And yes, they marry. And no one thinks the slightest thing is untoward about a man of 37 marrying a girl of 19 There has to be a line somewhere. If not, you could just keep going one step and one step further, and argue that you're just going that one step further. Why not allow infants to join the army, we already allowed the 4 year olds, because we already allowed the 4 and a half year olds, etc. At 18 it's generally accepted that humans have grown mature enough to hand…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:05 AM
1

Dresses, heels, and makeup, is there actually something inherently gendered there? It seems to be all cultural. Some thousands of years ago, none of it existed. And going from culture to culture today, the cultural bias can flip. Not sure about the heels, but certainly there are tribes where men use makeup. And for dresses, that depends on where you draw the lines for what you'd call a dress. Traditional attires of male Scots, Catholics, and wizards could qualify. And what's the big deal about a…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:33 PM
3

Generally I agree with keeping the accusers anonymous in such cases, but I don't see why that shouldn't be applied to the accused equally. Legally libelous or not, if you don't have a solid case to put forward, if you go this route instead, it makes it seem like your goal is defamation, rather than justice. And if you have a solid case, go that route.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:30 AM
2

I had TMNT dolls action figures as a kid. Still waiting for the gene tech to live up to that.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:23 AM
1

Sure, but what I maybe should said is that beyond the training, it is voluntary, essentially a career. Short of domestic war, probably.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 03:59 PM
3

It's moving towards gender neutral conscription now, as multiple parties have made it part of their program this year. One party seems to be more interested in removing conscription, and personally I would rather see all volunteer forces, as they don't take in everyone anyway. Might as well pick from the ones who desire it. And to be clear, it's not conscription into combat (e.g. NATO operations), but into a year of training.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter