TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

contrafagotto Archive

View 3 posts and 100 comments by contrafagotto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Regardless of what you might have meant, what you actually said — "This is, in short, a homosexual manifesto" — was right on the mark. To get through all the horse wash, it's necessary to see through, and dump, three things: Radical feminism Homophobia, replacing homophobia with an understanding of human sexuality informed by anthropology Puritan religion, such as Christianity. Red Pill is doomed to fail until it absorbs what is known about human sexuality through anthropology and sociology, and…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 10:08 PM
2

Yes ... It's all about getting the price of pussy down. It's not that all men have to go gay. But the more men learn to get off quick and easy with other men (as was the case in pretty much all pre-Christian cultures), the more the price of pussy comes down because of the competition. What most straight guys fail to see about the economics is that homophobia, and the monopoly it gives to women, is probably the No. 1 factor that inflates the price of pussy. Breaking the female monopoly and taking…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 06:01 PM
1

Just because you say so, and because you have heard it said all your life? You know nothing.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 05:37 PM
0

I can guarantee you that superior people are not dead, nor are they weak.'
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 05:36 PM
1

Yours (and mine, down-voted, of course) are the most insightful comments in this thread. Straight men are blinded, controlled, warped, and whipped by pussy. All of them, pretty much by definition. And even after years of reading their own Red Pill posts, they've made no progress toward becoming conscious of that fact.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 02:51 PM
1

You know nothing about human history — except that Christians did in fact kill a lot of people. That's what it takes to impose such a thing on people. You also apparently don't realize that the Christian religion is rapidly returning to the dung pile of history, where it belongs. Only the very lowest, least productive, and dumbest of humans are still in it.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 02:44 PM
-1

There is some good stuff here, and the good stuff sent me to the web site to do some reading. But I strongly disagree with an article at the web site that is not referenced in this post, Issue #48: Promiscuity & Civilization. His pronouncements are nothing more than unquestioned religious dogma wound around with fallacious reasoning. For example, he builds an elaborate slippery slope fallacy. Civilization itself, we are told, is threatened by promiscuity, because families are the building blocks…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 12:47 PM
1

I lived in San Francisco for 20 years, dip shit.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/18 03:44 PM
-1

You right-wing sociopaths sure do hate (and downvote) inconvenient truths, don't you?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/18 03:42 PM
-1

You're pathologizing introversion. I think you may be confusing introversion with being in somewhere on the mild side of the autism spectrum. For example, introverts often have superior social skills, simply because they pay attention to things, including social feedback. The failure to read social feedback is a feature of autism, not introversion.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/18 02:09 PM
29

I'm a gay liberal, and I lurk in this group to extend my cultural awareness. The lesbian totally deserved that rebuke after her "mansplaining" snark. Fair is fair. Highly amusing, too.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/17 12:13 AM
1

Who said anything about Sharia law? I'd rather live in a country with secular constitution, you dimwitted dolt. Again and again I encounter true-believing lightweights like you who have never encountered an actual intelligent liberal. You buy into the caricature of liberals sold by the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity, and O'Reilly. You think we're mere snowflakes who go down whimpering at the first little snicker-snack of your mighty talking points. I've engaged you for long enough to expose you for …
/r/TheRedPill04/12/17 11:31 PM
1

Insofar as the U.S. is a Christian country, it's our Constitution that keeps the church off our backs. Muslim countries don't seem to have that sort of firewall. Christians are doing their best to tear that firewall down. Did I mention that you are a compete idiot? Can you come up with anything that can't be dismissed with the flick of non-Christian finger? Do you know any fucking history?
/r/TheRedPill04/12/17 10:59 PM
1

You're a type, you know, and that's why I'm persisting in taking you down. Like many of your ilk, you project your own inferiority onto others. And like many of the guys in this group, you think you've found some sort of occult, arcane knowledge that has enlightened you and set you high above the rest of us. I'm telling you that you're an arrogant, self-deceiving, transparent little twit.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/17 10:38 PM
1

Pakistan and Africa, sure. I've also been in India and Thailand. Not to mention Denmark. And Paris. And rural Mexico. And lots of other places. As I see it, there are three religions on the planet that are pretty much equally trashy and utterly degrading to human beings — Islam, Hinduism, and Christianity. Hinduism, in spite of the human degradation it supports, at least is not a proselytizing religion like Islam and Christianity. The pathetic texts of Christianity are childish in their primitiv…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/17 10:29 PM
1

It's funny how how your delusions are so clear to you.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/17 12:38 PM
1

Empty words. I can tell you that my white Christian Republican neighbors are the vilest, most ignorant, and most hateful people I've ever encountered. The preachers are the worst.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 12:43 PM
1

Having spent a great deal of time in Europe, on the American coasts, and in the American South, it's obvious to me that the more Christian a place is, the more vile, hateful, hypocritical, mean, ignorant, and self-righteous it is.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/17 12:32 PM
0

Strange that you would be able to see feminization in Christianity but not its other absurdities. Read Tertullian, then Augustine — some of the most depraved lunatics in human history came up with it all. Because it's all around us and normalized doesn't make it any less sick or any less ridiculous.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 01:21 PM
1

You need to get out of Alabama and see the world.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 12:05 PM
4

Christian conservatism?? That's 96 percent of how you got where you are, buddy. It never ceases to amaze me how people blindly cling, as though for dear life, to the very thing that is dragging them under.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/17 12:15 PM
7

That is just about the dumbest statement about Islam and Christianity that I've heard yet.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/17 12:13 PM
-5

Because they were Christian, a shit religion second only to Islam in its shittiness.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/17 01:07 AM
4

Yes, yes, yes. And don't forget that stoicism is a pagan philosophy, with its roots in classical Greece. All too often, puritan notions based on revealed religion rather than rational philosophy (think Augustine of Hippo) are jammed into this group and passed off as wisdom (no-fap, for example). To keep it short and sweet, everything between Constantine and the Enlightenment was shit, except for a few heretics who were ahead of their time and who usually got burned for it.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 10:07 PM
1

As I said, you are a complete idiot. You know nothing. You are too stupid to be aware of how little you know. You think that your mental efforts are valid and can be projected onto the world outside your little bubble. And you even think that you have something to teach the rest of us. I am expressing my total contempt for you and for the notions that arise inside your little head.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 08:49 PM
0

Like I said, you need to work on your reasoning skills and how to recognize a fallacy. You make up something out of your own ugly imagination. Then you say that I'm "completely retarded" if I believe it. As for what cultures actually are like, you know nothing. It really disturbing, actually, that people as stupid as you exist.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 06:48 PM
0

For your self-improvement, I'd suggest that you get outside your ugly little bubble and find those cultures yourself. You might also work for 10 or 12 years on your reasoning skills before you throw around words like "proof" and "obvious." You know nothing, and one of the most important things you don't know about yourself is that you know nothing.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 12:58 PM
0

All traditional cultures restricted sex? When do you start the clock, buddy? I've got news to you. "Traditional cultures" didn't start 1,600 years ago with diseased minds like that of Augustine of Hippo. I guess they didn't offer anthropology 101 in the dinky little Bible college you went to. Prudes and puritans always and always, in every era, think that they are on the cutting edge of social progress and enlightened thinking. And you think you are so enlightened and so entitled that you'd even…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 12:22 PM
5

Isn't it becoming clear to everyone that TRP is in a tailspin? Every dimwitted jerk believes he is a sage.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/17 10:59 PM
0

NoFap is just one of the many ways in which TRP recycles Victorian thinking as cutting edge. NoFap is the new hair on your palms.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 01:55 PM
3

I don't dismiss Jung at all, when interpreted sensibly. I was replying to the comment about Jews.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/17 02:21 PM
7

The jackboots in this group are even more depraved and fascist than I had imagined.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/17 02:10 PM
0

Your questions are totally irrelevant. As I pointed out earlier, all you know is ideology. If someone argues with you, your knee jerks, you mouth starts flapping, and you automatically assume that that person is just ideological as you and is arguing black to your white. You are a dumbass knee-jerk right-winger, and you are a dime a dozen.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 11:57 AM
1

Sorry, I'm not going to read all that.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 11:30 PM
0

You are just another dumb-ass ideologue who assumed knee-jerkedly, because you are irrational and ideological, that I was merely advocating for the opposite of your right-wing ideology. What I said was that it's complicated, that reason and evidence matter and that your right-wing ideology does not matter. Do you get that?
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 11:28 PM
1

You somehow got the idea that I'm a socialist, which is not the case. I only said that Venezuela's situation is complicated. I could name Denmark (where I have spent a good bit of time), but that's complicated, too, and you don't do complicated. Don't bother with any knee-jerk statements about how the Denmark model won't adapt to the U.S., because as I said it's complicated, and I already understand that. You reveal your ideological blinders by immediately assuming that, because I think you're a…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 11:06 AM
1

I'm not young. And it would be nice if things were as simple as you think they are and as easy to explain with the one all-purpose ideological notion that you have at your disposal.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 10:53 AM
-4

I get great satisfaction in insulting the daylights out of clueless right-wingers after they show their asses and their ignorance. But I would have to point out that so far you've shown lots of bile in insulting a liberal, but you haven't brought any information to the subject of the post. The glare and hysteria are in the glazed ideological eyes of G_Petronius.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 12:31 PM
-5

See what I mean about ideology? It must be awfully nice to live in a black and white world like yours. You are just like your right-wing mentors taught you to be — extremely low on information, but full of bile and insults. Nothing in my being liberal requires me to be nice or respectful to people like you. Therefore, up yours.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 12:06 PM
-5

Venezuela? Some responses to this post simply blame Venezuela's problems on socialism, case closed. But it's far more complicated than that. It's about corruption, government paralysis, lawless attempts by the opposition to effect regime change, the collapse of the price of oil, an undiversified economy, international sanctions (including by the U.S.), and more. Far from actual socialism, private assets in Venezuela actually have risen in the past 15 years, from 65 to 71 percent, as money and co…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 11:35 AM
-1

You mean the same way war is not collective but is a just toolbox for the autonomous individual to use as he sees fit? You need to burn your Ayn Rand books. There are times when people must work together, with an agenda.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 07:38 PM
7

This is a brilliant insight. It's also a sure sign that you're paying way too high a price for pussy. The currency with which you're paying is time. My straight housemate used to gloat about the free (or at least bargain-priced) pussy to be had on Tinder. But before you know it, he's roped into boyfriend duties, consenting to spending entire weekends and as much as half of the week doing girly things and paying the pussy bill. You red pill guys still don't have a coherent strategy for working to…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 02:53 PM
1

Older guys (think near 80), particularly those with military experience, before the days when male-male sex immediately meant being saddled with the gay identity, often testify that jacking each other off was the usual thing. I believe that circle jerks were a real thing.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/17 01:50 PM
6

It's really amusing when this comes up, seeing so many brave manly-men squealing like Mormon girls and bitching like feminists the moment a gay guy hits on you. You're meat, guys. Letting other guys admire you and get you off is part of your male birthright. Until you understand this and comprehend that it's the only thing that will break the female monopoly on men and therefore bring down the price of pussy to where it was before Judeo-Christian purity-and-property rules and the romantic myth, …
/r/TheRedPill28/04/17 01:08 PM
1

What would you know about the progressive zeitgeist from inside your right-wing bubble? "Cultural censorships creeping into all forms of media that seek not to debate, but to silence all forms of dissent and criticism of the narrative?" That is pure horse shit, a right-wing nightmare. If any such censorship and silencing actually existed, a lying, pluperfect idiot with a false narrative would not have been elected to the U.S presidency last November, and the American ignorati would not believe a…
/r/TheRedPill26/03/17 11:23 AM
-4

I'm sure I'd agree with you about 1984, but I think you may be confused in how you extrapolate 1984 to 2017. As a leftist, I'm well aware that there are some silly radicals on the left who go too far, but nobody pays much attention to them. The truth remains that it's privilege and racism in particular that are the corrosives that are killing us, though the right wing has been incredibly successful at blaming the exploited for their own exploitation . A few noisy "social justice warriors" are no…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 02:22 PM
-37

It's a strange, strange mind that would see justice and its advocates as a cancer. Why don't you consider jamming it.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 12:58 PM
2

This post is pure bunk and something that happens often in this forum — the repackaging of Augustinian anti-sex horsewash as some sort of great wisdom. Why don't you read some anthropology and evolutionary biology and go jack off. Or go to church. Whatever.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/16 11:29 AM
1

That's what they said in 1845, too.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/16 06:19 PM
0

Why does this keep coming up? It is nothing but recycled Augustinian prudishness masquerading as newfound wisdom.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 09:49 PM
3

Winston Graham wrote a fine series of historical novels, the Poldark series, set in late 18th century Cornwall. The books were made into a TV series in the 1970s that very much retained the spirit in the books. And then last year, another TV series was made, this time with a female screenwriter. The female touched turned the new TV series into sentimental bodice ripper, embarrassing to watch. Clearly the idea was to feminize the Poldark novels and capitalize on the success of Outlander, the shit…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 12:41 PM
8

You are completely clueless and have bought into a raft of religious distortion and revisionism. Start with E.O. Wilson, and then you might be able to handle the Greeks in 15 or 20 more years after you reach an adult level of emotional maturity.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 11:49 AM
8

As a gay man, I can tell you this: Hell hath no fury like a straight woman who finds out that her man is having any kind of close relationship with a gay man. I'm a masculine gay man, and I have had a good many close (and sometimes covertly sexual) relationships with straight men. One of the things I observe is the stunning degree to which women police the behavior of their man. They snoop through his email. They interrogate him. If a woman discovers that a gay man is too close to her property, …
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 11:27 AM
2

Just listen to y'all ... a bunch of fucking prudish pussies squealing like girls if a guy wants you to put out. "I can't do that! It would ruin my reputation! How would I face myself in the morning! I'm not that kind of girl!" This may be a troll post, but he certainly showed you up for the bunch of strutting ninnies that you are. Why is there only one sexual thing in the world that you're afraid of? Where did you learn it? (Hint: Abrahamic religions after Rome. Read some Augustine of Hippo and …
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 11:59 PM
2

Please pardon me for underestimating you. You are more complex than I realized. At least you recognize your anger. We are constantly taught that to be angry is a moral failing. I don't think that. There is just too much to be angry about. There is nothing about Red Pill theory that should override decent principles of moral philosophy. You are a smart person, so I suggest that the next book you might want to read is John Rawls' "A Theory of Justice." No movement is sustainable, or worth supporti…
/r/altTRP11/08/15 04:25 PM
3

There are two kinds of people in the world. Those who take pleasure in rejection even to the point of boasting about it, and those who feel at least a bit of someone else's pain. One of the traps of Red Pill thinking is that it is virtuous to be a jerk. It may get you sex -- at least during your younger years -- but it won't get you much of anything else, should you ever need it. Eventually this is its own punishment as you discover whether anyone wants to be around you when you 50, 55, 60, 65 .…
/r/altTRP11/08/15 12:44 PM
3

I don't really have time for a long exposition. I'll just say look at the pre-Christian cultures, or recent cultures that have not been fucked up by the Abrahamic pathologies. I'll also say that you may have received some misconceptions around the idea of "a gender you're not attracted to." Male sexuality is much, much more complicated than that. A good way to start would be to have some relationships with straight-identified guys and just listen to what they say.
/r/altTRP24/05/15 11:23 PM
8

As I see it, the main point is to reclaim the right of all men to have sex with each other. The idea that gay men should "stick to their own kind" could have come into existence only in a post-Puritan, urbanized world. If you accept the ideas of, say, E.O. Wilson on how gay male sexuality evolved, it's clear that the 2 percent or so of men whom we identify as "gay" today would always have been interacting sexually with the larger male population during the long track of human history. Only stigm…
/r/altTRP24/05/15 02:16 PM
3

I think you are reacting to feminist spin on the Nature article, not the Nature article itself. Please see my other comment.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 12:05 AM
4

I think some of you are misinterpreting this article. I read it as an indictment of Puritan morality and Roman one-man one-woman marriage. If I read it correctly, it's only saying that nature favors sexual reproduction because species do best when alpha males reproduce a lot and beta males not very much. It's Red Pill research.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 12:02 AM
6

You're missing some factor. Character and intelligence are the first possibilities that come to mind. That's just one possibility, but guys who are very smart and who use their intelligence to lift others up rather than put others down can do very, very well. I speak from experience, because I'm an 8 who always had 10 boyfriends, some of them straight. There is a Socratic element in gay culture (and male culture in general) that, as far as I can tell, is totally absent in straight culture.
/r/altTRP22/03/15 09:23 PM
51

Student debt is another biggy. The wife of a friend of mine never mentioned her $40,000 in student debt until after they were married. That was after she "accidentally" got pregnant and pressured him into marriage.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 07:26 PM
20

I think that one thing every man has to do is carefully design his own "persona." That's how we package and present ourselves to the world. Our persona must come across as authentic, but only the naive would think that we can show our true selves (whatever that might be) to the world or wear everything on our shirtsleeves. We also may have multiple personas -- one for the office, one for social settings, etc. When we have multiple personas, they must be consistent for the sake of authenticity. I…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 01:33 PM
2

Homosexual behavior (what an ugly phrase) comes in multiple flavors. Of course your sexual orientation is not a choice. No reasonable person would question that you are exclusively attracted to women. But are you sexually attracted to your right hand? How much sex have you had with your right hand? In cultures in which homosexuality is not stigmatized, to straight men it is just an alternative and secondary way of getting off. It also comes with some fringe benefits, because it promotes male bon…
/r/altTRP20/01/15 12:43 AM
2

That's fascinating about the monastic orders. Could you give a source or some other hints about how I might research that?
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 12:15 AM
14

The poor are obese not because they eat well but because they eat the cheapest industrialized foods -- all carbs and no nutrition -- and lack the education to do better. If the rich weren't exempt from justice, Dimon and his ilk would be in prison. Besides, the poor are managed by the rich with bread and circuses and TV and don't even know who Jamie Dimon is, let alone that his head belongs on a spike. It's an ugly world that right-wingers live in.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 11:26 PM
22

I think you interpret the experiment the way you're ideologically disposed to interpret it. Do the rich and super-rich not talk loud and consume everything? Have you read Picketty? Who is it who demands cheap labor and therefore immigration? There's an awful lot of low-information, high-ideology, loud-talking right-wingery in this sub.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 10:42 PM
0

No its not. It's just that life is too short to try to reason with every dumb-ass little newbie to the Randroid religion. These days I just tell them they're full of shit and move on.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 01:56 AM
2

Good fucking grief. Grow up. Go ahead and call me out for an ad hominem reply, but you'll find the higher-end pushback all over the Internet. Ayn Rand was a fucking hack, a fucking hypocrite, a fucking bitch, and a fucking idiot.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 10:58 PM
2

No, I'm not a feminist. I'm too smart to be a feminist, and too smart to be a right-winger. The way you get to a high debt ratio is by 20 years of rotten GDP and a classic liquidity trap without a clue what to do about it. You are responding out of pure brain-dead right-wing ideology without the slightest reference to reality. You are an idiot and need to be reminded of it as often as possible.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 05:22 PM
1

This is total horse shit. Keynesianism had nothing to do with it. An asset bubble burst, leading to a severe collapse in asset prices and a deflationary spiral that has lasted 20 years. I'd say that a bubble and its bursting is a common failure of capitalism. The Bank of Japan didn't have a clue what to do and didn't see the deflation coming. As for national debt, the gross debt actually has steadily declined for almost 20 years. As a ratio to GDP, the number looks terrible because there have be…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 01:35 PM
1

Narcissistic personality disorder. Run for your life.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 12:16 PM
-1

I think there's a lot you don't know about men. Deal with it.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/14 04:00 PM
1

Someone has been reading too much Ayn Rand and not enough Machiavelli.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/14 03:40 PM
19

Campus rape is a classic moral panic. It has many features in common with the moral panic over satanic abuse in nursery schools that peaked in the late 1980s. In the New York Times story on Rolling Stone backing down, there is a chilling quote from a rape activist: "... We still need to believe survivors." A motto of the crazies during the nursery school panic was "Believe the children." The motto later became the name of an moral panic advocacy organization. Sex panics are a continuing feature …
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 10:14 PM
-10

Someone has been listening to too much Rush Limbaugh.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/14 12:46 PM
2

This will greatly alter the sexual economy and bring down the price of pussy. It's much more humane and civilized than the Iron Age solution (slaves and prostitutes) or the Victorian solution (prostitutes). Male-male sex also is an important check historically on the price of pussy, though it has dried up in the last 50 years with the invention of the dreaded gay identity. One of the reasons feminism has been able to flourish is that the forces of prudery have driven out the factors that kept do…
/r/TheRedPill23/11/14 11:19 PM
2

You make some interesting points, but when you refer to working class culture, I think you're not going back in history as far as I am. I'm an essentialist, I guess. In my view, straight guys have their own natural, essential motivations toward same-sex sex that are as old as our species, though social constructions appropriate to the period may be layered on top of those natural motivations. For social reasons, today's straight guys are going to need rationalizations for same-sex sex that make …
/r/altTRP20/11/14 01:57 PM
3

You should brush on on the concept of metaphor.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 02:07 AM
3

There is so much useless crap here about fucking women, as though that is the whole point of existence. There is more to life than fucking women and begetting offspring. Or, think of it this way: There is more than one kind of DNA to bring into the world and leave behind you when you die. There is intellectual DNA, cultural DNA, the DNA of knowledge, or of reform, building things, creating things, and so on. Even mentoring other men's children leaves your intellectual DNA in the world. If men pu…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/14 10:53 PM
5

That is one of the biggest horse-shit memes out there — argument by the definition of "straight." I assure you that straight guys have sex with guys all the time. I also assure you (though it should be self-evident) that we gay guys know a great deal more about this than you do. People like you would be the last to know about it. I've often thought that this is related to why so many people want to ostracize gay people and keep them silent and in the closet — we know the secrets of straight soci…
/r/altTRP11/11/14 12:57 PM
2

I totally agree that the creation of the gay/straight identity is the biggest backfire in our history. Old guys testify that (in the military, etc.) before they were aware of the identity thing, casual sexual contact was a regular thing. Guys jacked off together, jacked each other off, etc. Apparently they really did have circle jacks. One old guy once told me, "We didn't think it was gay. We just thought it was fun." The gay identity put an end to anything so casual. One can argue that the gay …
/r/altTRP22/10/14 12:32 PM
2

Guys are notoriously flaky online or in pickup places and tend to automatically devalue anyone encountered thus (except for the hottest .2 percent). Since you mention common interests, I'm guessing that you're looking for something more than a one-shot experience. I'd suggest looking for ways to meet compatible guys in non-pickup out-and-about situations that give you a chance to show your most desirable qualities. People treat each other with much more respect then. Be prepared to deal with the…
/r/altTRP20/10/14 08:42 PM
2

Hitting on straight guys is disrespectful. Horse shit.
/r/altTRP20/10/14 12:40 PM
10

My father was emotionally absent when I was a boy. Not until I was much older did I understand that he was having constant affairs and constantly chasing pussy. Even after he divorced my mother (he dumped her, in this case), his only hobby seemed to be chasing pussy. Plus he had to do the maintenance on his pussy supply du jour. He grew up in a matriarchal family, by the way, with six sisters and no brothers. I believe that he was so emotionally unavailable because he was throwing everything at …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 11:04 AM
3

In my experience, some sort of unspoken agreement occurs between two dominant guys who are becoming friends. This agreement includes backing each other up and looking out for each other rather than competing. Cooperation between males is as wired into us by evolution as is competition, I think. There may still be hierarchical components, but that should not be a problem. Sometimes one friend may defer to the other, but that need not involve any loss of face or status. Confidence is important her…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 11:22 AM
2

I think that what you're saying was particularly true of the Greeks and Romans. However, as a gay heretic in this sub, I am obliged to point out what the Christianization (and therefore the Puritanization) of our culture forces us to sweep under the rug. That is that, in those ancient cultures, women were not granted a monopoly on the male orgasm, and a significant percentage of male orgasms were obtained with other men. This Puritan-enabled female monopolization of male orgasms is closely relat…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 01:49 AM
1

Do you have to buy into the whole raft of vicious right-wing horseshit to be RedPill?
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 11:19 PM
3

Hmm. I'd say that it's because I'm as intelligent as they are, I listen, and I don't need to dominate them. It's a Socratic thing, I think, nicely modeled in Plato's dialogues. Before I retired, a savvy executive once complimented me on my management style and said that few people could pull it off. I encouraged the guys who reported to me to sass me and speak their minds. I tried to set the standard, then they were in charge of themselves. I'd sometimes play a little game with them during a rou…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 01:31 AM
31

I am 65. I have mentored a good many young men over the years. One of the most important things they get from me, I think, is a spirit of rebellion. We talk about the great rebels and heretics, including, strangely enough, a female heretic, Joan of Arc, who feminists today sweep under the rug. A rebel, of course, needs a cause. An important part of mentoring is a sort of Socratic process of helping young rebels get their cause into focus -- their own cause, not mine. Then we think about strategi…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 12:12 PM
1

In dealing with other men, there are three very different modes. The first mode is leadership, which requires competence, some charisma, and role-playing. The second mode is subversion and threat, which requires knowing one's Machiavelli. The third is team mode, working together or being together as co-equals. Half the trick is always knowing which mode you're in. For example, to attempt leadership with Machiavellian tactics will soon lead to disaster. One needs skill and experience in all three…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 11:57 AM
1

I'm using the word "puritan" pretty loosely to talk about Christian attitudes toward sex that started in antiquity with Paul of Tarsus and were very well codified by the theologian Augustine in the 4th century A.D.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 08:21 PM
1

One more comment here. With the Celts, insofar as anyone still understands them, it was not so much that men ruled. It's that there was a workable balance. Feminist writers often choose the old Celtic cultures as a setting, because women were empowered in a way they were not empowered in Greece or Rome. But as I understand that period, women didn't control men's sex lives or love lives. It was more a natural, and probably quite stable, balance. Men don't hate women. They just don't want to be ru…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 03:43 PM
1

It's interesting that you should ask. I don't know of such a book. So I had to undertake to write it myself. I recently published a book in novel form, as science fiction. I'm not going to do any self-promotion here, nor do I want to give up my anonymity, but if you message me privately I will give you the name of the book. However, this first book is just a start. It's set in the here and now. Not until book 2 will I be able to get into the alternatives, which are clear enough if one does the h…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 03:34 PM
13

I have been watching the men's movement for years. I read Warren Farrell's Myth of Male Power when it first came out in 1993. I read Camille Paglia in 1990. I recognized feminism's roots in puritanism long ago. I lived in San Francisco for 18 years and was around a lot of open-minded men with few hangups. But I kept waiting for a real movement to form. I couldn't understand why men weren't pushing back against the obvious hypocrisy and disguised swindles of feminism. Heck, even women like Camill…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 03:04 PM
4

You're quite right -- I wanted physical relationships, but I also was able to sublimate it and be a gentleman because I valued the friendship. Else my friendships couldn't have lasted for so many years. As for the gay shaming, I of course acknowledge that I can't know what was in the women's minds. But, knowing these men better than the women did, I can't really think of anything else powerful enough to destroy a longstanding friendship.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 02:38 PM
11

But, in my opinion, this is as least partly because women require that gay guys "stick to their own kind," which is a good definition of gay marriage. I think it's a no-brainer that if straight people can marry, gay people also should be able to marry. But I don't see it as a liberation. I see it as a new and modern extension of the Puritan yoke. Very few people other than serious gay historians realize that the whole idea of gay marriage was developed and promoted (starting the 1990s) by gay ar…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 02:27 PM
1

Brilliant and insightful. Thank you.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 02:23 PM
32

Frankly, it does feel like a blessing. I tease my straight housemate about having to contort himself for female sexuality. But he's an alpha and will only bend so much.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 02:21 PM
21

Women may be more accepting than men until their man is involved. Think of it this way: How would the average woman explain, to her girlfriends, her man's close friendship with a gay man? What advice are her girlfriends likely to give her?
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 02:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter