TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cookieblue2 Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by cookieblue2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This will continue to be an issue and a problem until the media gives full coverage to female pedophiles and child abusers and dispels the fiction that men are the majority of child molesters. But I don't think the media will pick up that memo until after the courts and judges start prosecuting female abusers and molesters as aggressively as they do males.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:31 AM

Calling it a debt default implies that the debt claimed by the federal reserve bank is legitimate. It clearly is not legitimate and the domestic debt is a fiction created to funnel the nation's money into a small cartel of financiers who create nothing and profit endlessly.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:28 AM
2

I think those are cases in which a target's relative strength was underestimated, really.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:30 AM

Sent
/r/MensRights14/01/15 04:09 AM

I used to process paperwork for a statewide agency that collected data on car accidents, injury and non-injury, with listing for at-fault or not-determined, as well as the degree of injury or vehicle damage and of what type. I had access to hundreds of thousands of reports. Men are not more likely to be in an accident, nor are they more likely to be the guilty party in an accident. Not at any age or condition. The myth that men get in more accidents than women comes from the determination of fau…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:38 AM
1

Pretty much my thoughts on the matter. When you abandon the preconceived notion of feminism as a progressive movement and actually look at what it does and says, it really is a very conservative group.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:05 AM
3

Equality is when you give me more, she says. More, and more. Always more. Never stop.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:02 AM
13

This crap will only stop when every woman that strikes a man is charged to the fullest extent of the law, without fail. .. but then the goddamned feminists will just claim that we're using the criminal justice system to oppress them. God that'd be some irony.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 12:48 AM
14

I've considered many times making this point. If she does it consensually, it's legal. if she's drunk, it's theft. If she gets drunk and gives a bum ten bucks, will she regret it when she sobers up and have him arrested for theft? If she buys a lottery ticket and it doesn't win, should she sue the store that sold it because she regretted that transaction? The standards they are trying to apply are unworkable with any kind of justice. But then, they're not really concerned with justice, are they?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 04:32 AM
1

Economic Left/Right: -6.50 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15 I'm surprised it didn't label me as even more left and more libertarian than that. By most people's standards, I'm loopy liberal. Huh.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 11:15 PM
7

I have never been this excited about reverse psychology before. I gotta give this a test run and see if it works.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:09 AM
14

That would be hilarious. Can we make this a thing? Can we have people go to the Women's clubs and Feminist clubs and ask them to sign up along with the men of the school?
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:49 AM
2

Not one, but two instances of people saying mean things about women! This means that clearly every man must immediately stop what ever he may be doing and sign this petition, boycott these companies, alienate his friends, and aggressively re-educate any younger male relatives or offspring he may have. And it's really the best thing you could do for him! Says a man whose entire livelihood depends on pandering to the dominant paradigm of male-female relations and the legal distinctions of emotiona…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:43 AM
12

No part of this surprises me at all. This is completely predictable drawing from past observations and extrapolating to new events. Feminists only care about statistics when they've got the more shocking information to reveal. And they will cling to it as hard as they can for as long as they can, no matter how noncredible or how specious it may be. But numbers that don't serve them ...First they deny, then they claim bias, then they ignore it. Look for the quick shift to move the goalposts and r…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:35 AM
2

I powered through it and read the rest. You didn't miss anything.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:20 AM

The difference between theory and practice is that, in theory, there's no difference.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:06 AM
1

Have you ever run across a men's rights initiative to ban a word? To tell people that they can't say a particular thing? To engage in actual censorship? And yes, control of dialogue is necessarily a bad thing. Having discretion over your own message is acceptable. Veto power over someone else's message is wrong. Do you mean when you compared men to dogs? I gotta tell you, I'm not surprised that got people a bit riled up. Comparisons like that have a lot of history to them. People are not 'tone p…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 12:51 AM
3

Maybe you're naive. Maybe you walked in here and said, "shucks, I'll bet these guys would be much better off if they just sat down and -really- -listened- to each other." Okay, let me pop that bubble: it's been tried. It's been done to death. For decades. The pattern is clear: they demand room to speak, then they shout us down. They pull fire alarms. They barricade meeting rooms. They doxx us, swat us, the accuse us of vast and horrifying crimes, they get gag orders and restraining orders on tru…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:45 AM
5

Of course the 'counterparts' have agreed to those terms. Those are their terms. Not ours. They want to ban words: we don't. They want to control dialogue: we don't. They want to claim offense at jokes: we don't. They want to mandate tact and deference: we prefer straight speech and clear definitions. They want to demand that we police our own to their satisfaction, and police their own to their own satisfaction. They want to talk about personal experiences, that's all they've got. We prefer fals…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:16 AM
1

I wouldn't disregard your chances off the bat. After all, the National Organization of Women has only male in their present leadership. And he's in charge of technical affairs. Woman-owned or feminist-inclined does not often mean that they won't ask men to take care of the work-work.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:45 AM
2

Also, the "women are wonderful" effect. It's pretty well-documented. The majority of people are raised by women more than men, and are socialized by women more than men, and are educated by women more than men. It's a rare person whose formative years inclined them to prefer the company and perspective of adult males over adult females.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:41 AM
1

You make a strong argument that women are developing a socialist state-within-a-state fueled and supported by men's capitalism.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 02:36 AM
2

Honestly, I'd throw this rule out entirely. As personal anecdotes and "lived experience" have no place in any formal discussion or symposia. It's great for gab-time at the coffee klatsch, but in any environment that allows structured debate or redress of ideological difference, you need to keep the topic focused on statistical truths, widespread trends, and the larger populations. Otherwise, two things will happen. (1) Your entire conversation will get bogged down as the more petty elements use …
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter